1
|
Molecular characterization of colorectal cancer related peritoneal metastatic disease. Nat Commun 2022; 13:4443. [PMID: 35927254 PMCID: PMC9352687 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32198-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A significant proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients develop peritoneal metastases (PM) in the course of their disease. PMs are associated with a poor quality of life, significant morbidity and dismal disease outcome. To improve care for this patient group, a better understanding of the molecular characteristics of CRC-PM is required. Here we present a comprehensive molecular characterization of a cohort of 52 patients. This reveals that CRC-PM represent a distinct CRC molecular subtype, CMS4, but can be further divided in three separate categories, each presenting with unique features. We uncover that the CMS4-associated structural protein Moesin plays a key role in peritoneal dissemination. Finally, we define specific evolutionary features of CRC-PM which indicate that polyclonal metastatic seeding underlies these lesions. Together our results suggest that CRC-PM should be perceived as a distinct disease entity. Colorectal cancer can lead to the development of peritoneal metastases, which are associated with worse disease outcome. Here, the authors characterize peritoneal metastases from 52 patients using RNA-seq and mutational sequencing and show a distinct molecular subtype.
Collapse
|
2
|
García-Fadrique A, Estevan Estevan R, Sabater Ortí L. Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:188-202. [PMID: 34435297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standardization of surgical outcomes throughout surgical procedures is mandatory. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) should provide proficient oncological and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant quality indicators and their quality standard, and to determine their acceptable quality limit. A systematic review on cytoreductive results from 2000 to 2018 was performed focusing on clinical guidelines, consensus conferences, and publications. After the selection of quality indicators, a systematic review of indexed references was performed in order to calculate the quality standard for each indicator. STUDY SELECTION Unicentric/multicentric series, comparative studies, and clinical trials. Studies were to include outcomes after cytoreduction of colorectal origin and series with more than 50 patients. Quality indicators with at least 10 series were mandatory and objective measurements were also mandatory for inclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Quality indicators selected were 1- to 5-year survival, overall disease-free survival, 1- to 5-year disease-free survival, complete surgical resection, duration of surgery, length of stay, overall morbimortality, major morbidity, re-intervention, postoperative hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, postoperative medical complications, overall recurrence, and failure to rescue. RESULTS The most relevant quality indicators and critical quality limits were overall disease-free survival and 5-year overall disease-free survival (14 months and <10 months, and 14% and <4%, respectively), completeness of surgical resection (89% and <80%, respectively), overall mortality (3% and >8%, respectively), overall morbidity (47% and >63%, respectively), failure to rescue (12% and <30%, respectively), reintervention (13 and <22%, respectively), anastomotic leakage (6% and <13%, respectively), and overall recurrence (60% and <74%, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the first study to assess quality standards in CRS + HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The current data are of particular relevance for future studies to control the variability of this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Sabater Ortí
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Direct surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:2865-2872. [PMID: 34116900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, but there is little scientific evidence for this approach. This study aimed to study survival in patients treated with direct surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), i.e. without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with histopathologically confirmed peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer that underwent first-time CRS-HIPEC with complete cytoreduction (CC0 or 1) at Karolinska University Hospital 2012-2019 were included. Patients with synchronous extraperitoneal metastases were excluded if not treated before end of follow-up. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. The multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, synchronous/metachronous peritoneal metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), extraperitoneal metastases and the pathological tumor (T) and lymph node (N) stage of the primary tumor. RESULTS In all, 131 patients underwent complete CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median OS and DFS were 40.3 months and 12.5 months, respectively, in patients treated with direct surgery. In the multivariable model, PCI≥16 was the only variable associated with decreased OS, whereas elevated PCI, metachronous development of peritoneal metastases and synchronous extraperitoneal metastases were associated with decreased DFS. Age was not associated with an impaired prognosis. CONCLUSION Patients who underwent direct surgery with CRS-HIPEC had a good prognosis, with a median OS of more than 3 years. The results from this study question the need of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all patients eligible for CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou S, Jiang Y, Liang J, Pei W, Zhou Z. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis: a retrospective study of its safety and efficacy. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:151. [PMID: 34001125 PMCID: PMC8130121 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02255-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are effective routine treatments for colorectal peritoneal metastasis (PM). However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before CRS+HIPEC are poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the perioperative safety and long-term efficacy of NAC prior to CRS+HIPEC for patients with synchronous colorectal PM. Methods Patients with synchronous colorectal PM who received NAC prior to CRS+HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. The clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative parameters, and survival rates of patients who underwent CRS+HIPEC with NAC (NAC group) and patients who underwent CRS+HIPEC without NAC (non-NAC group) were compared. Results The study enrolled 52 patients, with 20 patients in the NAC group and 32 in the non-NAC group. In the NAC group, the proportion of patients with a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score < 12 was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (80.0% vs 50.0%, P = 0.031), and more patients achieved complete cytoreduction (80.0% vs 46.9%, P = 0.018). The two groups had comparable grade III/IV complications and similar reoperation and mortality rates (P > 0.05). However, patients who received NAC had lower platelet counts (151.9 vs 197.7 × 109/L, P = 0.036) and neutrophil counts (4.7 vs 7.2 × 109/L, P = 0.030) on postoperative day 1. More patients survived for 2 years in the NAC group than in the non-NAC group (67.4% vs 32.2%, respectively, P = 0.044). However, the completeness of cytoreduction score (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.14–7.84; P = 0.026), rather than NAC, was independently associated with overall survival (OS) in the multivariate analysis after controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion NAC administration before CRS+HIPEC can be regarded as safe and feasible for patients with colorectal PM with comparably low mortality rates and acceptable morbidity rates. Nevertheless, large-sample randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm whether the administration of NAC before CRS+HIPEC confers a survival benefit to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yujuan Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cashin P, Sugarbaker PH. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal and appendiceal peritoneal metastases: lessons learned from PRODIGE 7. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S120-S128. [PMID: 33968432 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-2020-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment for peritoneal metastases from appendiceal, colon and rectal cancer (MO1) has relied on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) to remove all visible evidence of disease plus a perioperative chemotherapy for the entire abdomen to eliminate microscopic residual disease. Using the results obtained from the PRODIGE 7 randomized controlled trial, methodological issues were discussed and possible improvements to the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with oxaliplatin were sought. Possible methodological and pharmacologic flaws were identified. Several methodological flaws included the sample size, cross-over option, neoadjuvant chemotherapy use and timing of the peritoneal disease evaluation. The sample size issue raised the question of what the minimal clinically relevant benefit we want in future trials. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX may have induced acquired drug resistance to oxaliplatin. Several pharmacological issues were identified including limited 5-fluorouracil exposure as well as limited oxaliplatin peritoneal exposure time. Insufficient 5-fluorouracil accompanied the oxaliplatin as only a bolus dose was used and continuous 5-FU infusion has previously been an integral part of oxaliplatin treatment. Finally, only approximately one-half of the oxaliplatin entered body tissues or tumor. Three suggestions from the lessons learned from a critique of PRODIGE 7 were offered as adjustments to the HIPEC protocol. The Efficacy of HIPEC, a perioperative FOLFOX or a return to HIPEC with mitomycin C were described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul H Sugarbaker
- Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Effect and safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy on patients suffering from colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:84. [PMID: 33752702 PMCID: PMC7986417 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02197-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most commonly diagnosed malignant carcinoma and the third most common cause of carcinoma-related mortality, continues to be a major international health problem. And approximately 33% of patients suffer from recurrence after radical surgery. Free malignant cell implanting in the peritoneum is generally accepted as one of the main reasons of such outcome. We did this present clinical study with the aim of evaluating the effects and safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IOC) on patients suffering from colorectal cancer, with hoping to find a novel, effective, and available approach to deal with malignant cell implanting during surgeries. Methods In total, 391 patients who went through colorectal radical surgery were considered eligible between June 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. 220 patients were treated with surgery without IOC, while other 171 patients received surgery plus IOC. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, postoperative short-term outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between these above 2 groups in the selected population. Result The present research included 391 patients (251 men and 140 women) who underwent surgery without IOC (n = 171) or surgery plus IOC (n = 220), with a mean (SD) age of 60.4 (9.7) years in the surgery without IOC group and 60.6 (8.7) in the surgery plus IOC group (P=.85). No significant differences were witnessed between the two groups in surgery-related information and postoperative complications. It is worth noting that IOC independent of other factors was associated with a favor prognosis in CRC patients with stage II/III (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30–0.82, P=.006). Moreover, for patients with stage II colorectal carcinoma, DFS did not differ between two groups (P=.553, Kaplan-Meier log-rank), and OS was no exception. In stage III CRC patients, the estimated DFS rate for patients receiving IOC was 82.2% and patients without IOC was 66.4% after 3 years, which demonstrated that IOC was associated with a favorable prognosis in stage III patients (P=.012, Kaplan-Meier log-rank). Furthermore, the differences were still remained between the two groups when considering the influence about postoperative chemotherapy (P=.014, Kaplan-Meier log-rank). IOC can also significantly improve patients’ overall survival whether they get treatment with POC (P=.006, Kaplan-Meier log-rank; P=.025, Kaplan-Meier log-rank). Conclusions In the present study, we have found that surgery plus IOC generated a favorable prognosis for stage III CRC patients but not stage II without any side-effects when the dosage of lobaplatin was 0.1g/L. As a new, safe, and simple procedure, IOC therapy is easily performed—and does not require any special devices or techniques. Thus, IOC is a promising and exciting therapeutic strategy for patients with CRC.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou S, Feng Q, Zhang J, Zhou H, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Chen H, Wang Z, Liang J, Pei W, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Wang X. High-grade postoperative complications affect survival outcomes of patients with colorectal Cancer peritoneal metastases treated with Cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:41. [PMID: 33413223 PMCID: PMC7791857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07756-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) arising from colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods Patients with PM arising from CRC treated with CRS and HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. High-grade complications that occurred within 30 days were defined as grade 3 to 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models for overall survival were created. Predictors of high-grade postoperative complications were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results In all, 86 consecutive cases were included in this study. Forty-one patients (47.7%) developed postoperative complications, while 22 patients (25.6%) experienced high-grade complications. No mortality occurred during the postoperative period. The median survival of all patients was 25 months, and the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 35.0%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, a high peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score (HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 1.01–1.14; P=0.015) and grade 3–4 postoperative complications (HR, 1.86, 95% CI, 1.22–3.51; P=0.044) correlated with worse overall survival. High estimated blood loss (OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; P< 0.001) was identified as an independent risk factor for developing high-grade complications. Conclusion Careful patient selection, high levels of technical skill and improved perioperative management are crucial to ensure patient survival benefits after CRS+HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qiang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Huanxing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, 100122, China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhaoxu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Haipeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Narasimhan V, Tan S, Kong J, Pham T, Michael M, Ramsay R, Warrier S, Heriot A. Prognostic factors influencing survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1482-1495. [PMID: 32027455 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer confer the worst survival among all metastatic sites. The adoption of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can offer selected patients with isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) a favourable long-term survival. There are numerous factors postulated to influence survival in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. The aim of this study was to identify the key perioperative prognostic factors that influence survival in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for isolated CRPM. METHOD A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate prognostic factors influencing survival in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for isolated CRPM. RESULTS Thirty-three studies fitted the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, with 25 studies included in the meta-analysis. On pooled analysis, incomplete cytoreduction, increasing peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) and lymph node involvement were significantly associated with a worse survival. Additionally, a rectal primary [hazard ratio (HR) 1.93, 95% CI 1.10-3.37], adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.93) and perioperative grade III/IV morbidity (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17-2.16) were also found to significantly influence survival. Notably, tumour differentiation and signet ring cell histology did not influence survival on pooled analysis. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis confirms that in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for isolated CRPM, incomplete cytoreduction, high PCI and lymph node involvement have a negative influence on survival. In addition, a rectal primary, adjuvant chemotherapy use and grade III/IV morbidity are important factors that also significantly influence survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Narasimhan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Tan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Kong
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Pham
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Ramsay
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Warrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Heriot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nagourney RA, Evans S, Tran PH, Nagourney AJ, Sugarbaker PH. Colorectal cancer cells from patients treated with FOLFOX or CAPOX are resistant to oxaliplatin. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:738-742. [PMID: 33004272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have suggested benefit for heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colon cancer. However, the PRODIGE 7 trial that randomized 265 colon cancer patients to surgery plus HIPEC vs. surgery alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) did not confirm benefit. These data were published as an abstract and not as a peer-reviewed manuscript. One concern is that prior drug exposure may select for drug resistance and blunt HIPEC efficacy. METHODS A database query identified colon cancer specimens evaluated for chemotherapy sensitivity by ex-vivo analysis of programmed cell death (EVA/PCD), a primary culture platform that examines drug-induced cell death (apoptotic & non-apoptotic) by morphologic, metabolic and histologic endpoints. RESULTS Of 87 fresh colon cancer specimens, 54 (62%) were untreated and 33 (38%) had received prior folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX). In an apoptosis assay, the lethal concentration of 50% (LC50) in untreated patients was significantly lower than in patients treated by FOLFOX (p = 0.002). Then to approximate PRODIGE 7, treated patients were separated by having received oxaliplatin treatment less than or greater than 2 months before EVA/PCD analysis. The degree of resistance increasing significantly for patients who received treatment less than 2 months prior to EVA/PCD (p < 0.002). Activity for mitomycin and irinotecan was not significantly different for untreated vs. treated patients, but 5-FU was more resistant (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS The failure of PRODIGE 7 to improve survival with surgery plus HIPEC following NACT may reflect diminished oxaliplatin cytotoxicity in patients whose residual disease has been selected for oxaliplatin and 5-FU resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Paul H Sugarbaker
- Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Narasimhan V, Flood M, Warrier S, Heriot A. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: still a necessity? ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:1541-1542. [PMID: 32924302 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh Narasimhan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Flood
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish Warrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beagan JJ, Sluiter NR, Bach S, Eijk PP, Vlek SL, Heideman DAM, Kusters M, Pegtel DM, Kazemier G, van Grieken NCT, Ylstra B, Tuynman JB. Circulating Tumor DNA as a Preoperative Marker of Recurrence in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Cancer: A Clinical Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061738. [PMID: 32512811 PMCID: PMC7357031 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) may be curative for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases (PMs) but it has a high rate of morbidity. Accurate preoperative patient selection is therefore imperative, but is constrained by the limitations of current imaging techniques. In this pilot study, we explored the feasibility of circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis to select patients for CRS-HIPEC. Thirty patients eligible for CRS-HIPEC provided blood samples preoperatively and during follow-up if the procedure was completed. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of DNA from PMs was used to identify bespoke mutations that were subsequently tested in corresponding plasma cell-free (cf) DNA samples using droplet digital (dd) PCR. CtDNA was detected preoperatively in cfDNA samples from 33% of patients and was associated with a reduced disease-free survival (DFS) after CRS-HIPEC (median 6.0 months vs median not reached, p = 0.016). This association could indicate the presence of undiagnosed systemic metastases or an increased metastatic potential of the tumors. We demonstrate the feasibility of ctDNA to serve as a preoperative marker of recurrence in patients with PMs of colorectal cancer using a highly sensitive technique. A more appropriate treatment for patients with preoperative ctDNA detection may be systemic chemotherapy in addition to, or instead of, CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie J. Beagan
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.J.B.); (P.P.E.); (D.A.M.H.); (D.M.P.); (N.C.T.v.G.)
| | - Nina R. Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (N.R.S.); (S.B.); (S.L.V.); (M.K.); (G.K.); (J.B.T.)
| | - Sander Bach
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (N.R.S.); (S.B.); (S.L.V.); (M.K.); (G.K.); (J.B.T.)
| | - Paul P. Eijk
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.J.B.); (P.P.E.); (D.A.M.H.); (D.M.P.); (N.C.T.v.G.)
| | - Stijn L. Vlek
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (N.R.S.); (S.B.); (S.L.V.); (M.K.); (G.K.); (J.B.T.)
| | - Daniëlle A. M. Heideman
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.J.B.); (P.P.E.); (D.A.M.H.); (D.M.P.); (N.C.T.v.G.)
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (N.R.S.); (S.B.); (S.L.V.); (M.K.); (G.K.); (J.B.T.)
| | - D. Michiel Pegtel
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.J.B.); (P.P.E.); (D.A.M.H.); (D.M.P.); (N.C.T.v.G.)
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (N.R.S.); (S.B.); (S.L.V.); (M.K.); (G.K.); (J.B.T.)
| | - Nicole C. T. van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.J.B.); (P.P.E.); (D.A.M.H.); (D.M.P.); (N.C.T.v.G.)
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.J.B.); (P.P.E.); (D.A.M.H.); (D.M.P.); (N.C.T.v.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-(0)20-4442-495
| | - Jurriaan B. Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (N.R.S.); (S.B.); (S.L.V.); (M.K.); (G.K.); (J.B.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong JSM, Tan GHC, Chia CS, Ong J, Ng WY, Teo MCC. The importance of synchronicity in the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:10. [PMID: 31931817 PMCID: PMC6958608 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-1784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) occur in up to 13% of patients with colorectal cancer, presenting either synchronously or metachronously. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) have been increasingly utilised for selected CPM patients with favourable outcomes, though its benefits may differ for synchronous (s-CPM) and metachronous CPM (m-CPM). Methods A retrospective analysis of CPM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore over 15 years was performed. In the s-CPM group, CPM was diagnosed at primary presentation with CRS and HIPEC performed at the time of or within 6 months from primary surgery. In the m-CPM group, patients developed CPM > 6 months after primary curative surgery. Results One hundred two patients with CPM were treated with CRS and HIPEC. Twenty (19.6%) patients had s-CPM and 82 (80.4%) had m-CPM. Recurrences occurred in 45% of s-CPM and in 54% of m-CPM (p = 0.619). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged in patients with m-CPM (45.2 versus 26.9 months, p = 0.025). In a subset of m-CPM patients with limited PCI in whom ICU stay was not required, a survival advantage was seen (p = 0.031). Conclusion A survival advantage was seen a subset of m-CPM patients, possibly representing differences in disease biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolene Si Min Wong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Johnny Ong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Wai Yee Ng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Melissa Ching Ching Teo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhatt A, Kammar P, Mehta S, Damodaran D, Zaveri S, Patel MD, Sinukumar S, Ray M, Seshadri R. Chasing Rainbows? the Possibility of "Cure" in Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC-a Retrospective Study by INDEPSO. Indian J Surg Oncol 2019; 10:49-56. [PMID: 30886494 PMCID: PMC6397129 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00879-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC results in a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 12-15 months, overall survival (OS) of 23-63 months, and cure in around 15% of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The wide variation in OS may largely be attributed to different criteria for patient selection employed by different investigators. To evaluate outcomes of CRS and HIPEC for CPM in patients enrolled in the Indian HIPEC registry. A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the registry since its inception in March 2016 was performed. The impact of various prognostic factors on DFS and OS was evaluated. From Jan 2013 to Dec 2017, 68 patients underwent CRS with HIPEC at six Indian centers. The median PCI was nine [range 3-35]. Twenty-two (32.3%) had mucinous tumors. A CC-0 resection was performed in 53 (77.9%) and CC-1 in 14 (20.5%). The median DFS was 12 months [95% CI 11.037-12.963 months] and the median OS 25 months [95% CI 18.718-31.282]. The DFS was inferior in patients with right upper quadrant involvement (p = 0.02) and 90-day major morbidity (p = 0.002) and OS inferior in those with 90-day major morbidity (p < 0.001) and mucinous tumors with a PCI > 20. The DFS compares well with results obtained by pioneering teams but we have no "cured" patients. Better patient selection and utilization of systemic therapies could in the future improve the OS. There is a compelling need to identify subgroups of CPM that benefit from the addition of HIPEC to CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Zydus Hospital Road, SG Highway, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Praveen Kammar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sanket Mehta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Dileep Damodaran
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MVR Cancer Centre and Research Institute, Calicut, India
| | - Shabber Zaveri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Mahesh D. Patel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Zydus Hospital Road, SG Highway, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Snita Sinukumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Mukurdipi Ray
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sluiter NR, Tuynman JB. ASO Author Reflections: Advanced Imaging Allows Better Detection of Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:165-166. [PMID: 30474765 PMCID: PMC6338702 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7083-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Roelie Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurriaan Benjamin Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sluiter NR, Tuynman JB. ASO Author Reflections: Toward Improved Selection of Patients for Cytoreduction and HIPEC: Identification of Prognostic Factors for Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:840-841. [PMID: 30302638 PMCID: PMC6329718 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6842-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|