1
|
Wach MM, Nunns G, Hamed A, Derby J, Jelinek M, Tatsuoka C, Holtzman MP, Zureikat AH, Bartlett DL, Ahrendt SA, Pingpank JF, Choudry MHA, Ongchin M. Normal CEA Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion Predict Improved Survival from Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2391-2400. [PMID: 38270826 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14901-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Normal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (≤ 2.5 ng/ml) after resection of localized colorectal cancer or liver metastases are associated with improved survival, however, these trends are understudied for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-institution study of patients with CRPM undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS/HIPEC) with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). CEA was measured before and after NACT and within 3 months after CRS/HIPEC. RESULTS A total of 253 patients (mean age 55.3 years) with CRPM undergoing CRS/HIPEC had complete CEA data and 191 also underwent NACT with complete data. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index score (PCI) of the overall cohort was 12 and 82.7% of patients had complete cytoreduction (CC0). In total, 64 (33.5%) patients had normal CEA levels after NACT with a median overall survival (OS) of 45.2 months compared with those with an elevated CEA (26.4 months, p = 0.004). Patients with normal CEA after NACT had a lower PCI found at the time of surgery than those with elevated CEA (10 versus 14, p < 0.001), 68 (26.9%) patients with an elevated preoperative CEA level experienced normalization after CRS/HIPEC, and 118 (46.6%) patients had elevated CEA after CRS/HIPEC. Patients who experienced normalization demonstrated similar OS to patients that had normal CEA levels pre- and post-surgery and improved OS compared with those with elevated postop CEA (median 41.9 versus 47 months versus 17.1 months, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Normal CEA levels after NACT and/or CRS/HIPEC are associated with improved survival for patients with CRPM. Patients that normalize CEA levels after surgery have similar survival to those with normal preoperative levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Wach
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Geoffrey Nunns
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ahmed Hamed
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Derby
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark Jelinek
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Curtis Tatsuoka
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - James F Pingpank
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grange R, Rousset P, Williet N, Guesnon M, Milot L, Passot G, Phelip JM, Le Roy B, Glehen O, Kepenekian V. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2378-2390. [PMID: 38170409 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14840-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selection of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant peritoneal (PM) and liver metastases (LM) for radical treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), including liver resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), needs improvement. This retrospective, monocentric study was designed to evaluate the predictive factors for early recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in such patients treated in a referral center. METHODS Consecutive colorectal cancer patients with concomitant LM and PM treated with curative intent with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, simultaneous complete CRS, liver resection, and HIPEC in 2011-2022 were included. Clinical, radiological (before and after preoperative chemotherapy), surgical, and pathological data were investigated, along with long-term oncologic outcomes. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence (diagnosed <6 months after surgery), DFS, and OS. RESULTS Of more than 61 patients included, 31 (47.1%) had pT4 and 27 (40.9%) had pN2 primary tumors. Before preoperative chemotherapy, the median number of LM was 2 (1-4). The median surgical PCI (peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was 3 (5-8.5). The median DFS and OS were 8.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-10.1) and 34.1 months (95% CI 28.1-53.5), respectively. In multivariate analysis, pT4 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.14 [1.2-16.78], p = 0.032]) and pN2 (OR = 3.7 [1.08-13.86], p = 0.042) status were independently associated with an early recurrence, whereas retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 39 [8.67-175.44], p < 0.001) was independently associated with poor OS. CONCLUSIONS In colorectal cancer patients with concomitant PM and LM, an advanced primary tumor (pT4 and/or pN2) was associated with a higher risk of early recurrence following a radical multimodal treatment, whereas RLN metastases was strongly detrimental for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Grange
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CICLY EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Mathias Guesnon
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Vahan Kepenekian
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France.
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flood MP, Jain A, Mitchell C, Hewitt C, Ramsay R, Michael M, Heriot AG, Tie J. The impact of molecular and mismatch repair status on the survival outcomes of surgically treated patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2218-2225. [PMID: 35750576 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stratification of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) using RAS/BRAF mutational status may refine patient selection for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This study aimed to analyse the association of RAS/BRAF status and their variants, with clinicopathological variables and survival outcomes in patients who have undergone CRS ± HIPEC. METHODS A single centre, peritonectomy database was interrogated for patients with CRPM who underwent peritonectomy procedures between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS During the study period, 174 patients were included. Molecular status was obtained on 169 patients, with 68 (40.5%) KRAS, 25 (14.8%) BRAF and 6 (3.6%) NRAS mutations detected. Patients with BRAF mutations were more likely to be mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) (BRAF 20%, KRAS 4.4%, wild type 8.6%, p = 0.015). Most common BRAF and KRAS variants were, V600E (80%) and G12D (39.7%), respectively. BRAF V600E was independently associated with worse overall (median: 28 months, multivariate: HR 2.29, p = 0.026) and disease-free survival (median: 8 months, multivariate: HR 1.8, p = 0.047). KRAS G12V was a strong prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival (median: 9 months, HR 2.63, p = 0.016). dMMR patients (14/161, 8.7%) exhibited worse median overall survival compared to those with proficient MMR (dMMR 27 months, pMMR 29 months p = 0.025). CONCLUSION This study highlights the importance of molecular analysis in CRPM stratification. BRAF V600E mutations predict poor outcomes post CRS and HIPEC and may help refine patient selection for this procedure. Molecular analysis should be performed preoperatively to characterise prognosis and guide perioperative therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Flood
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Anshini Jain
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Mitchell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Molecular Pathology, Australia
| | - Chelsee Hewitt
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Molecular Pathology, Australia
| | - Robert Ramsay
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van de Vlasakker VCJ, Lurvink RJ, Cashin PH, Ceelen W, Deraco M, Goéré D, González-Moreno S, Lehmann K, Li Y, Moran B, Morris DL, Piso P, Quadros CA, Rau B, Somashekhar SP, Sommariva A, van der Speeten K, Spiliotis J, Sugarbaker PH, Teo MCC, Verwaal VJ, Yonemura Y, Glehen O, de Hingh IHJT. The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Eur J Surg Oncol 2021:S0748-7983(21)00499-6. [PMID: 34020808 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The PRODIGE 7-trial investigated the additional value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The results of PRODIGE 7 were presented at the 2018 ASCO meeting showing that 30 min oxaliplatin-based HIPEC did not improve overall survival. The current study investigated the impact of PRODIGE 7 on the worldwide practice of CRS and HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS CRS-HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning the current CRS-HIPEC practice in their hospital and country, and were asked to appraise the effect of PRODIGE 7. RESULTS The survey was completed by 18/19 experts. Although their personal opinions of CRS-HIPEC were barely influenced by PRODIGE 7, they reported a substantial impact on daily practice. This included a switch towards Mitomycin-C based HIPEC-regimens and prolongation of HIPEC perfusion time, a reduction in the number of referrals from non-HIPEC centers, a reduction in national consensus, the removal of HIPEC from national guidelines, and a reduced reimbursement rate. CONCLUSION The PRODIGE 7 has had a major impact on the practice of CRS-HIPEC for CPM worldwide. HIPEC remains an attractive option with potential for control and eradication of disease and further studies into the optimal HIPEC-regimen are urgently needed. Meanwhile, given the complexity of the treatment of patients with CPM, and the proven benefits of optimal CRS, referral of patients with potentially resectable CPM to expert centers is recommended whilst the precise role of HIPEC is further evaluated.
Collapse
|
5
|
Engbersen MP, Rijsemus CJV, Nederend J, Aalbers AGJ, de Hingh IHJT, Retel V, Lambregts DMJ, Van der Hoeven EJRJ, Boerma D, Wiezer MJ, De Vries M, Madsen EVE, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Van Koeverden S, De Reuver PR, Beets-Tan RGH, Kok NFM, Lahaye MJ. Dedicated MRI staging versus surgical staging of peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer patients considered for CRS-HIPEC; the DISCO randomized multicenter trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:464. [PMID: 33902498 PMCID: PMC8077799 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Selecting patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCPM) who might benefit from cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is challenging. Computed tomography generally underestimates the peritoneal tumor load. Diagnostic laparoscopy is often used to determine whether patients are amenable for surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown to be accurate in predicting completeness of CRS. The aim of this study is to determine whether MRI can effectively reduce the need for surgical staging. Methods The study is designed as a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of colorectal cancer patients who are deemed eligible for CRS-HIPEC after conventional CT staging. Patients are randomly assigned to either MRI based staging (arm A) or to standard surgical staging with or without laparoscopy (arm B). In arm A, MRI assessment will determine whether patients are eligible for CRS-HIPEC. In borderline cases, an additional diagnostic laparoscopy is advised. The primary outcome is the number of unnecessary surgical procedures in both arms defined as: all surgeries in patients with definitely inoperable disease (PCI > 24) or explorative surgeries in patients with limited disease (PCI < 15). Secondary outcomes include correlations between surgical findings and MRI findings, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life (QOL) analysis. Conclusion This randomized trial determines whether MRI can effectively replace surgical staging in patients with CRCPM considered for CRS-HIPEC. Trial registration Registered in the clinical trials registry of U.S. National Library of Medicine under NCT04231175.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - C J V Rijsemus
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - V Retel
- Department of Psychosocial research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E J R J Van der Hoeven
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M De Vries
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E V E Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Van Koeverden
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - P R De Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sutton PA, O'Dwyer ST, Barriuso J, Aziz O, Selvasekar CR, Renehan AG, Wilson MS. Indications and outcomes for repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intra-peritoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101572. [PMID: 33915487 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is offered in specialist centres as a treatment for peritoneal surface tumours. Despite its demonstrated efficacy, intra-abdominal recurrence occurs in 31-57% of patients. The aim of this study is to review the early and long-term outcomes in patients who undergo repeat CRS/HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who had undergone repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal neoplasms and colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) from 2003 to 2019 was performed at a single specialist centre. Data pertaining to both short term outcomes and survival were evaluated. RESULTS Of 1259 patients who had undergone CRS/HIPEC, 84(6.7%) underwent repeat surgery: 45(53.6%) had pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) secondary to low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN), 21(25.0%) had appendix carcinoma and 18(21.4%) had CRPM. Demographics, intra-operative findings and short-term outcomes were comparable across tumour types and between procedures. Median (95% CI) interval between procedures was 22.7(18.9-26.6) months and was comparable between tumour types. Median (95%CI) overall survival was not reached for the cohort overall or for those with PMP, but was 61.0(32.6-89.4) months for those with appendix cancer and 76.9(47.4-106.4) months for CRPM (p=<0.001). Survival was favourable in the PMP group (HR [95%CI] 0.044 [0.008-0.262]; p = 0.000) and unfavourable in the CC2-3 at index CRS procedure group (HR [95%CI] 25.612 [2.703-242.703]; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that repeat cytoredutive surgery with HIPEC can result in favourable survival, especially for patients with PMP when complete cytoreduction is achieved at index operation. We recommend that detailed patient assessment is performed through an expert multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Sutton
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK.
| | - S T O'Dwyer
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - J Barriuso
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK
| | - O Aziz
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK
| | - C R Selvasekar
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK
| | - A G Renehan
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M S Wilson
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Flood MP, Waters PS, Kelly ME, Shields C, Conneely J, Ramsay R, Michael M, Loveday B, Warrier SK, Mulsow J, Heriot AG. Outcomes following synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study. Surg Oncol 2021; 37:101553. [PMID: 33839444 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres. METHOD This bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV). RESULTS Twenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0-22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4-54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months. CONCLUSION Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.
Collapse
|
8
|
Flood M, Narasimhan V, Waters P, Ramsay R, Michael M, Warrier S, Heriot A. Survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A systematic review and discussion of latest controversies. Surgeon. 2020;. [PMID: 33023847 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal metastases confer the worst survival amongst all sites of metastatic colorectal cancer. The adoption of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become an option for patients with isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following CRS and HIPEC for CRPM from published high volume cohort studies and to highlight the latest controversies and future directions of CRPM treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was performed on published studies on the treatment outcomes of CRS and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. RESULTS Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The median survival for all patients ranged from 14.6 to 60.1 months. The 5-year overall survival ranged from 23.4% to 52%. For patients with complete cytoreduction, the median survival was 25 to 49 months. Major morbidity and mortality ranged from 15.1% to 47.2% and 0% to 4.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION CRS and HIPEC for the treatment of CRPM is safe and current evidence suggests it improves both median and disease-free survival. However, the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, in particular oxaliplatin, has recently come under scrutiny. Accordingly, higher quality evidence is urgently required to contribute to multidisciplinary and international consensus on CRPM treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
9
|
Narasimhan V, Warrier S, Michael M, Ramsay R, Heriot A. Oxaliplatin versus Mitomycin C following complete cytoreduction for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:2104-2112. [PMID: 31745907 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04447-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can offer selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) a favorable long-term survival. While cytoreductive techniques are standardized, there remains great variability in HIPEC drugs with mitomycin C or oxaliplatin use based largely on institute preference. In this study, we compared outcomes based on mitomycin C or oxaliplatin use after complete cytoreduction. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis over a 7-year period of all patients undergoing complete cytoreduction with HIPEC. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients underwent complete cytoreduction with HIPEC during this time. Forty-six patients received oxaliplatin as HIPEC, and 32 received mitomycin C. There was no difference in patient characteristics, resections, or major morbidity between the two groups. Superficial wound infections were higher in the mitomycin C group (37.5% v 15.2%, p = 0.02). Median overall and disease-free survival for the entire cohort was 40 and 14 months, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between the two HIPEC groups (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.11-2.28). CONCLUSION Complete cytoreduction and HIPEC can offer selected patients a favorable survival. The choice of mitomycin C or oxaliplatin for HIPEC had no influence on survival. Prospective studies are needed to explore this important issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh Narasimhan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Satish Warrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robert Ramsay
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kepenekian V, Glehen O. Peritoneal metastases management: Towards the era of prospective randomized trials? Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:1-3. [PMID: 32576480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vahan Kepenekian
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EMR 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EMR 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wong JSM, Tan GHC, Chia CS, Ong J, Ng WY, Teo MCC. The importance of synchronicity in the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:10. [PMID: 31931817 PMCID: PMC6958608 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-1784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) occur in up to 13% of patients with colorectal cancer, presenting either synchronously or metachronously. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) have been increasingly utilised for selected CPM patients with favourable outcomes, though its benefits may differ for synchronous (s-CPM) and metachronous CPM (m-CPM). Methods A retrospective analysis of CPM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore over 15 years was performed. In the s-CPM group, CPM was diagnosed at primary presentation with CRS and HIPEC performed at the time of or within 6 months from primary surgery. In the m-CPM group, patients developed CPM > 6 months after primary curative surgery. Results One hundred two patients with CPM were treated with CRS and HIPEC. Twenty (19.6%) patients had s-CPM and 82 (80.4%) had m-CPM. Recurrences occurred in 45% of s-CPM and in 54% of m-CPM (p = 0.619). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged in patients with m-CPM (45.2 versus 26.9 months, p = 0.025). In a subset of m-CPM patients with limited PCI in whom ICU stay was not required, a survival advantage was seen (p = 0.031). Conclusion A survival advantage was seen a subset of m-CPM patients, possibly representing differences in disease biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolene Si Min Wong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Johnny Ong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Wai Yee Ng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Melissa Ching Ching Teo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 9 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hentzen JEKR, van der Plas WY, Kuipers H, Ramcharan S, Been LB, Hoogwater FJH, van Ginkel RJ, van Dam GM, Hemmer PHJ, Kruijff S. Delta peritoneal cancer index (ΔPCI): A new dynamic prognostic parameter for survival in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:590-9. [PMID: 31806520 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) calculated during exploratory laparotomy is a strong prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) who undergo cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). Progression of the PCI between diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) and potential CRS + HIPEC (ΔPCI) might be a more dynamic prognostic factor for OS after CRS + HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2012 and 2018, all colorectal PM patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy for potential CRS + HIPEC after DLS were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into stable disease (ΔPCI 0-3), mild progression (ΔPCI 4-9), or severe progression (ΔPCI ≥10). Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox regression were performed. RESULTS Eighty-four patients (ΔPCI 0-3, n = 35; ΔPCI 4-9, n = 34; and ΔPCI ≥10, n = 15) were analysed. Median OS after CRS + HIPEC was significantly decreased in patients with a ΔPCI of 4-9 (35.1 [95% CI 25.5-44.6]) or ΔPCI ≥10 (24.1 [95% CI 11.7-36.5]) compared to patients with a ΔPCI of 0-3 (47.9 [95% CI 40.0-55.7], p = 0.004). In multivariate regression analysis, ΔPCI remained an independent risk factor for OS: ΔPCI 4-9 HR 3.1 (95% CI 1.4-7.2, p = 0.007) and ΔPCI ≥10 HR 4.4 (95% CI 1.5-13.1, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION A high ΔPCI is an independent dynamic prognostic factor for OS and might reflect a more aggressive tumour biology in patients with colorectal PM. HIPEC surgeons should be aware of a high-ΔPCI-associated diminished prognosis and should reconsider CRS + HIPEC when confronted with a ΔPCI ≥10.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bushati M, Rovers KP, Sommariva A, Sugarbaker PH, Morris DL, Yonemura Y, Quadros CA, Somashekhar SP, Ceelen W, Dubé P, Li Y, Verwaal VJ, Glehen O, Piso P, Spiliotis J, Teo MCC, González-Moreno S, Cashin PH, Lehmann K, Deraco M, Moran B, de Hingh IHJT. The current practice of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: Results of a worldwide web-based survey of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1942-8. [PMID: 30075978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, selected patients with resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) are increasingly treated with a combination therapy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study was to investigate the current worldwide practice. METHODS HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning their personal expertise and current hospital and countrywide practice. RESULTS It is estimated that currently more than 3800 patients with CRC-PM (synchronous and metachronous) are annually treated with CRS and HIPEC in 430 centers. Integration of CRS and HIPEC in national guidelines varies, resulting in large treatment disparities between countries. Amongst the experts, there was general agreement on issues related to indication, surgical technique and follow up but less on systemic chemotherapy or proactive strategies. CONCLUSION This international survey demonstrates that CRS and HIPEC is now performed on a large scale for CRC-PM patients. Variation in treatment may result in heterogeneity in surgical and oncological outcomes, emphasising the necessity to reach consensus on several issues of this comprehensive procedure. Future initiatives directed at achieving an international consensus statement are needed.
Collapse
|