Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States: A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis

Accuracy and Prognostic Impact of Nodal Status on Preoperative Imaging for Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study

BACKGROUND

We sought to define the accuracy of preoperative imaging to detect lymph node metastasis (LNM) among patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), as well as characterize the impact of preoperative imaging nodal status on survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pNETs between 2000 and 2020 were identified from eight centers. Sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and OctreoScan for LNM were evaluated. The impact of preoperative lymph node status on lymphadenectomy (LND), as well as overall and recurrence-free survival was defined.

RESULTS

Among 852 patients, 235 (27.6%) individuals had LNM on final histologic examination (hN1). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 12.4%, 98.1%, 71.8%, and 74.4% for CT, 6.3%, 100%, 100%, and 80.1% for MRI, 9.5%, 100%, 100%, and 58.7% for PET, 11.3%, 97.5%, 66.7%, and 70.8% for OctreoScan, respectively. Among patients with any combination of these imaging modalities, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 14.9%, 97.9%, 72.9%, and 75.1%, respectively. Preoperative N1 on imaging (iN1) was associated with a higher number of LND (iN1 13 vs. iN0 9, p = 0.003) and a higher frequency of final hN1 versus preoperative iN0 (iN1 72.9% vs. iN0 24.9%, p < 0.001). Preoperative iN1 was associated with a higher risk of recurrence versus preoperative iN0 (median recurrence-free survival, iN1→hN1 47.5 vs. iN0→hN1 92.7 months, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 4% of patients with LNM on final pathologic examine had preoperative imaging that was suspicious for LNM. Traditional imaging modalities had low sensitivity to determine nodal status among patients with pNETs.

[Enucleation of pancreatic tumors: a multiple-center study]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the immediate results of enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The results of enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) were analyzed in 95 patients between 2016 and 2021. Functioning tumors (mean size 16.8 mm) were found in 70 patients, non-functioning (mean size 25 mm) - in 25 patients. Intraparenchymal tumors were found in 48 people, extraorganic lesion - in 47 patients.

RESULTS

There were 262 patients with pNETs who underwent various surgeries between 2016 and 2021. Various resections were performed in 167 (63.8%) cases, enucleations - in 95 (36.2%) patients. Traditional surgical approach was used in 65 patients. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 21 patients (type B - 17, type C - 4), while arrosive bleeding occurred in 6 patients with unfavorable outcomes in 2 cases. Minimally invasive surgeries were performed in 30 patients. Eight patients with intraparenchymal tumors required conversion to open surgery. Type B pancreatic fistula occurred in 5 patients that led to arrosive bleeding in 2 cases (hemostasis was provided by endovascular method). Comparison of intraparenchymal and extraorgan tumors regarding the incidence of pancreatic fistula revealed odds ratio 5.26 (95% CI 1.5355; 18.0323, p=0.0041). Postoperative mortality was 2.1%.

CONCLUSION

Enucleation is advisable for highly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors up to 2 cm. Minimally invasive enucleation is indicated for extraorgan tumors. Intraparenchymal tumors significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications.

Characteristics of small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and risk factors for invasion and metastasis

BACKGROUND

The number of people with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) (tumors with a diameter less than or equal to 2 cm) is gradually increasing, but the selection of treatment strategy is still controversial. Our aim was to characterize small pNETs with a poor prognosis and to define the impact of aggressive small pNETs on survival and the risk factors for the development of invasive disease.

METHODS

Patients with pNETs diagnosed between 2004 and 2019 and a tumor diameter of 2 cm or less were selected from the SEER Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to identify the factors affecting patient survival, and binary logistic regression was used to identify the associated risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 3261 patients with pNETs were enrolled in the study. Both older and younger patients benefited from surgery. Regional invasion occurred in 10% of the patients, and distant metastases occurred in 9% of the patients, but in both categories, those who underwent surgery had better survival outcomes than those who did not. There was no difference in survival between patients with a tumor diameter of 1-2 cm and those with a tumor diameter of less than 1 cm, and there was no difference in survival between patients with functional and nonfunctional small pNETs. However, the survival of patients with pNETs in the head of the pancreas was worse than that of patients with tumors in other parts of the pancreas. Survival was worse in elderly patients and in those with poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors. Lymphatic metastasis, regional invasion, and distant metastasis all worsened the prognosis of patients. The presence or absence of neuroendocrine function, the degree of tumor differentiation, and the location of the tumor were associated with the risk of lymphatic metastasis and regional invasion; the risk factors for distant metastasis were associated with the degree of differentiation and tumor location.

CONCLUSION

The pNETs ≤ 2 cm in diameter could be still aggressive, and patient prognosis worsens after invasive disease develops. Attention to the characteristics of aggressive tumors can improve patient survival.

The role of oncologic resection and enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is variable. Patients may undergo formal oncologic resection, encompassing regional lymphadenectomy, or enucleation. This study's aim was to understand if enucleation is adequate treatment for PNETs <2 cm METHODS: The US National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2016 was used to identify patients who underwent oncologic resection or enucleation for PNETs <2 cm. Fisher's exact test, log-rank, and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

Of 4083 patients, 75.6% underwent oncologic resection with a median (range) number of 8 (0-99) lymph nodes examined, and 24.1% underwent enucleation. Five-year overall survival rate was 89.7% in node-negative patients versus 82.1% in node-positive patients (p < 0.001). No survival difference existed between patients who underwent enucleation versus oncologic resection (5-yr OS of 88.5% vs 88.2%, p = 0.064). According to AJCC classification, 3776 patients were clinically-staged with evidence of node-negative disease. Of these, 75.1% underwent oncologic resection, of which 9.9% had node-positive disease after resection. Tumor grade and size independently predicted nodal upstaging after oncologic resection.

CONCLUSION

One-tenth of patients with clinically node-negative disease were node-positive after surgery. Although this was not reflected in overall survival, patients who receive enucleation with higher grade and larger size may benefit from enhanced surveillance for locoregional recurrence.

Survival Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection Among Elderly Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy is the main curative therapeutic option for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Given the indolent behavior of pNETs and the relatively limited lifetime of elderly patients, the impact of primary site surgery (PSS) of pNETs on long-term outcomes among older patients has been a topic of debate.

METHODS

Patients aged 70 or older with pNETs were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and the End Results (SEER) database from 1998 to 2016. Propensity score matching was used to compare overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients who did versus did not undergo PSS.

RESULTS

Among 2,319 elderly patients with pNETs, 942 patients (40.6%) underwent PSS, while 1,377 (59.4%) did not undergo PSS (non-PSS: NPSS). After propensity score matching (n = 433 in each group), PSS group had improved survival compared with the NPSS group (5-year OS: 53.4% vs. 37.3%; 5-year CSS: 77.2% vs. 58.1%, both p < 0.001). In contrast, subgroup analysis of individuals aged ≥ 80 revealed no difference in 5-year CSS (PSS: 69.2% vs. NPSS: 67.4%, p = 0.27). A subgroup analysis among patients who had small (≤ 2 cm) non-functional (NF) pNETs noted comparable long-term outcomes among patients who underwent PSS versus NPSS patients (5-year OS: 73.1% vs. 66.5%, p = 0.19; 5-year CSS: 98.5% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 2 in 5 elderly patients with pNETs underwent PSS. While PSS was generally associated with prolonged OS and CSS among older patients, PSS was not associated with improved CSS among a subset of patients aged 80 or older, as well as among patients age ≥ 70 years with NF-pNET less than 2 cm.

Identifying Risk Factors and Patterns for Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study

Simple Summary

Approximately 30% of patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) will develop metastases. Curative-intent treatment largely involves resection. Identifying patients with early recurrence (ER) following resection might help tailor adjuvant therapies and the surveillance intensity. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine an evidence-based cut-off value for ER, and to explore risk factors associated with ER. ER was identified 18 months after surgery. Tumor size (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05–1.37, p = 0.007) and positive lymph nodes (OR 4.69, 95%CI 1.41–15.58, p = 0.01) were independently associated with ER. Patients with ER had lower post-recurrence free survival and overall survival than patients with late recurrence. These data support intensive follow-up shortly after surgery, and adjuvant therapy may help improve survival in pNET patients with ER after surgery.

Abstract

Background: Identifying patients at risk for early recurrence (ER) following resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) might help to tailor adjuvant therapies and surveillance intensity in the post-operative setting. Methods: Patients undergoing surgical resection for pNETs between 1998–2018 were identified using a multi-institutional database. Using a minimum p-value approach, optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined based on the difference in post-recurrence survival (PRS). Risk factors for early recurrence were identified. Results: Among 807 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pNETs, the optimal length of RFS to define ER was identified at 18 months (lowest p-value of 0.019). Median RFS was 11.0 months (95% 8.5–12.60) among ER patients (n = 49) versus 41.0 months (95% CI: 35.0–45.9) among non-ER patients (n = 77). Median PRS was worse among ER patients compared with non-ER patients (42.6 months vs. 81.5 months, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, tumor size (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05–1.37, p = 0.007) and positive lymph nodes (OR: 4.69, 95% CI: 1.41–15.58, p = 0.01) were independently associated with ER. Conclusion: An evidence-based cut-off value for ER after surgery for pNET was defined at 18 months. These data emphasized the importance of close follow-up in the first two years after surgery.

Recurrence of Non-functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Curative Resection: A Tumor Burden-Based Prediction Model

BACKGROUND

Patients can experience recurrence following curative-intent resection of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). We sought to develop a nomogram to risk stratify patients relative to recurrence following resection of NF-pNETs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for NF-pNETs between 1997 and 2016 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impact of clinicopathologic factors, including tumor burden score (TBS) (TBS² = (maximum tumor diameter)² + (number of tumors)²), was assessed relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS), and a nomogram was developed and internally validated.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 31.0 months (IQR 11.3-56.6 months), 66 (15.8%) out of 416 patients in the cohort experienced tumor recurrence. Overall, 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS following curative-intent resection was 83.2%, 74.0%, and 44.7%, respectively. Several factors were associated with risk of recurrence including tumor grade (referent G1: G2, HR 4.07, 95% CI 2.29-7.26, p < 0.001; G3, HR 10.83, 95% CI 3.72-31.53, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (HR 4.71, 95% CI 2.69-8.26, p < 0.001), as well as TBS (referent low: medium, HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.06-9.24, p < 0.001; high, HR 6.04, 95% CI 2.96-12.31, p < 0.001). A weighted nomogram including tumor grade (G1 0, G2 54.19, G3 100), LNM (N0 0, N1 42.06), and TBS (low 0, medium 44.07, high 56.48) was developed. The discriminatory power of the nomogram was very good with a C-index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.79) in the training cohort and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) in the validation cohort. In addition, the nomogram performed better than the current 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging system, which had a C-index of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram that incorporated tumor grade, LNM, and TBS was established that had good discrimination and calibration. The nomogram may be an effective tool to stratify patients relative to recurrence risk following resection of NF-pNETs.

Indications and outcomes of enucleation versus formal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common procedures for patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). Nevertheless, certain patients may benefit from a pancreas-preserving resection such as enucleation (EN). The aim of this study was to define the indications and differences in long-term outcomes among patients undergoing EN and PD/DP.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection of a pNET between 1992 and 2016 were identified. Indications and outcomes were evaluated, and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to compare long-term outcomes between patients who underwent EN versus PD/DP.

RESULTS

Among 1034 patients, 143 (13.8%) underwent EN, 304 (29.4%) PD, and 587 (56.8%) DP. Indications for EN were small size (1.5 cm, IQR:1.0-1.9), functional tumors (58.0%) that were mainly insulinomas (51.7%). After PSM (n = 109 per group), incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C was higher after EN (24.5%) compared with PD/DP (14.0%) (p = 0.049). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was comparable among patients who underwent EN (47 months, 95% CI:23-71) versus PD/DP (37 months, 95% CI: 33-47, p = 0.480).

CONCLUSION

Comparable long-term outcomes were noted among patients who underwent EN versus PD/DP for pNET. The incidence of clinically significant POPF was higher after EN.

Prognosis analysis of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after surgical resection and the application of enucleation

Objective

To investigate the prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs) after surgical resection, and to analyze the value of enucleation for pNETs without distant metastasis that are well-differentiated (G1) and have a diameter ≤ 4 cm.

Methods

Data from pNET patients undergoing surgical resection between 2004 and 2017 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank testing were used for the survival comparisons. Adjusted HRs with 95% CIs were calculated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to estimate the prognostic factors. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

This study found that female, cases diagnosed after 2010, and pancreatic body/tail tumors were protective factors for good survival, while histological grade G3, a larger tumor size, distant metastasis, AJCC 8th stage III-IV and age over 60 were independent prognostic factors for a worse OS/CSS. For the pNETs that were well-differentiated (G1) and had a tumor diameter ≤ 4 cm, the type of surgery was an independent factor for the long-term prognosis of this group. Compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy, patients who were accepted enucleation had better OS/CSS.

Conclusion

For pNETs patients undergoing surgical resection, sex, year of diagnosis, tumor location, pathological grade, tumor size, distant metastasis, race, and age were independent prognostic factors associated with the OS/CSS of patients. For pNETs patients with G1 and a tumor diameter less than 4 cm, if the tumor was located over 3 mm from the pancreatic duct, enucleation may be a wise choice.

The Landmark Series: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from pancreatic islet cells that remain relatively rare but are increasing in incidence worldwide. While significant advances have been made in recent years with regard to systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease, surgical resection remains the standard of care for most patients with localized tumors. Although formal pancreatectomy with regional lymphadenectomy is the standard approach for most PNETs, pancreas-preserving approaches without formal lymphadenectomy are acceptable for smaller tumors at low risk for lymph node metastases. Furthermore, observation of small, asymptomatic, low-grade PNETs is a safe, initial strategy and is generally recommended for tumors < 1 cm in size. In this Landmark Series review, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of PNETs.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is unknown. However, current guidelines recommend a watch-and-wait strategy for small nonfunctional PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk stratification and prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of PNETs to guide decision-making for lymphadenectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies reporting either risk factors of LNM in resected PNETs or survival of patients with LNM. The weighted average incidence of LNM was calculated according to tumor characteristics. Random-effects metaanalyses were performed, and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the impact of LNM on overall survival (OS). In subgroup analyses, NF-PNETs were assessed.

RESULTS

From a total of 5883 articles, 98 retrospective studies with 13,374 patients undergoing resection for PNET were included. In all PNETs, the weighted median rates of LNM were 11.5% for small (≤ 2 cm) PNETs and 15.8% for G1 PNETs. In NF-PNETs, the rates were 11.2% for small PNETs and 10.3% for G1 PNETs. LNM of all PNETs (HR 3.87, 95% CI 3.00-4.99, P < 0.001) and NF-PNETs (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.81-8.83, P < 0.001) was associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM is potentially prevalent even in small and well-differentiated PNETs and is associated with worse prognosis. A watch-and-wait strategy for small NF-PNETs should be reappraised, and oncologic resection with lymphadenectomy can be considered. Prospective and controlled studies are needed in the future.

Head and body/tail pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors have different biological characteristics and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) has continued to increase, but for pNETs, there is still no distinction between treatments based on anatomical location. We aim to determine whether NETs located at the head and body/tail of the pancreas are different.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016), we focused on pNETs patients with comprehensive information. The patients were divided into two groups based on tumors' location. We compared the characteristics of the two groups and assessed the risk factors for lymphatic metastasis. Survival analysis was performed based on the biological characteristics of the tumor.

RESULTS

In all 3011 patients, pNETs were more common in the body/tail (62.94%) than in the head (37.06%) of the pancreas. The risk factors for lymph node metastasis in the two groups were different. Nonmetastatic, low-grade pancreatic body/tail NETs had the best prognosis (p < 0.001). For low-grade tumors (G1-G2), lymphatic metastasis did not significantly affect the prognosis of patients with pancreatic head NETs (p = 0.098) but affected the overall survival of patients with pancreatic body/tail NETs (p < 0.001). The tumors at the pancreatic head were larger (p = 0.001), more likely to have positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001) and more prone to locally advanced and distant invasion (p < 0.001). The prognosis of pancreatic head NETs 21-40 mm was worse than that of body/tail pNETs (p < 0.001). For non-functional NETs, the overall survival of pancreatic body/tail tumors was better (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The pancreatic head and pancreatic body/tail NETs have different biological characteristics and clinical outcomes and they should be treated differently.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are increasingly recognized entities, whose incidence has dramatically grown during the last two decades. Surgery plays a pivotal role in their management as it represents the only chance of cure. Since PanNENs display a wide range of aggressiveness, their surgical management needs to be tailored on tumor's and patient's characteristics. Currently, there are several open questions and burning issues in the field of PanNEN, such as the management of asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) ≤ 2 cm. An active surveillance of these small lesions has been demonstrated to be safe although the available evidences are only based on retrospective studies. On the other hand, formal pancreatic resection associated with lymphadenectomy represents the gold standard for patients with localized NF-PanNEN > 2 cm or NF-PanNEN ≤ 2 cm in the presence of symptoms, dilation of the main pancreatic duct or suspicion of nodal metastases. Surgery plays also an important role in the setting of metastatic disease. In particular, surgery is generally recommended in the presence of low-grade, resectable, metastatic disease, but several series have reported also a survival benefit of palliative primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The role of surgery in PanNEN G3 is still controversial. Indeed, surgery is associated with an improved survival in patients with well-differentiated PanNET G3, whereas there is almost no survival benefit in case of poorly differentiated lesions.

Dedicated Cancer Centers are More Likely to Achieve a Textbook Outcome Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study is to assess rates of textbook outcome (TO) among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatopancreatic (HP) surgery for cancer at dedicated cancer centers (DCCs) and National Cancer Institute affiliated cancer centers (NCI-CCs) versus non-DCC non-NCI hospitals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files were utilized to identify patients undergoing HP surgery between 2013 and 2017. TO was defined as no postoperative surgical complications, no 90-day mortality, no prolonged length of hospital stay, and no 90-day readmission after discharge.

RESULTS

Among 21,234 Medicare patients, 8.2% patients underwent surgery at DCCs whereas 32.1% underwent surgery at NCI-CCs and 59.7% underwent an operation at neither DCCs nor NCI-CCs. Although DCCs more often cared for patients with severe comorbidities [Charlson score > 5: DCCs, 1195 (68.9%), NCI-CCs, 3687 (54.1%), others, 3970 (31.3%); p < 0.001], DCCs achieved higher rates of TO compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals. Interestingly, DCCs were more likely to perform surgery with a minimally invasive approach versus NCI-CCs and other US hospitals (17.0%, n = 295, vs. 12.6%, n = 856 vs. 11.9%, n = 1504, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing liver surgery at DCCs had 31% and 36% higher odds of achieving TO compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals, respectively. Medicare expenditure was substantially lower for patients achieving TO at DCCs compared with patients who achieved a TO at NCI-CCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though DCCs more frequently took care of patients with high comorbidity burden, the likelihood of achieving TO for HP surgery at DCCs was higher compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals. The data suggest that DCCs provide higher-value surgical care for patients with HP malignancies.