Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Minimally Invasive Surgical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer: An International Propensity Score-Matched Study

Risk factor analysis and nomogram construction of postoperative complications for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy

Introduction

The combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NICT) has become a common treatment regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the safety and efficacy of radical gastrectomy following NICT (NICT-G) remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors influencing postoperative complications (POCs) after NICT-G. Additionally, it aimed to construct a nomogram to provide a clinical reference for predicting POCs.

Methods

This study included 177 patients who received NICT-G at the Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center from January 2020 to January 2024. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the risk factors influencing POCs, and a nomogram model was constructed. To evaluate the discrimination and accuracy of the nomogram model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration curve were measured.

Results

In 177 patients who received NICT-G, the pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were 15.8% and 45.2%, respectively, whereas the rates of the overall and severe treatment-related adverse events were 71.8% and 15.8%, respectively. In addition, 43 (24.3%) patients developed overall POCs (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ II). Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses showed that age ≥70 years, greater estimated blood loss, platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≤196, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >1.33, non-R0 resection, and body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 were independent risk factors for overall POCs (p < 0.05). The nomogram model developed using the abovementioned variables showed that the AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.808 (95% CI): 0.731-0.885 in predicting the POC risk. The calibration curves showed that the prediction curve of the nomogram was a good fit for the actual POCs (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 5.76, P = 0.451).

Conclusion

The independent risk factors for overall POCs in the NICT-G were age ≥ 70 years, greater estimated blood loss, PLR ≤ 196, NLR > 1.33, non-R0 resection, and BMI < 18.5 kg/m2. The nomogram model developed based on the abovementioned indicators showed better accuracy in predicting the POC risk.

Distal Versus Total D2-Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Secondary Analysis of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes Including Quality of Life in the Multicenter Randomized LOGICA-Trial

BACKGROUND

Distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer can cause less morbidity than total gastrectomy (TG), but may compromise radicality. No prospective studies administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and few assessed quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

The multicenter LOGICA-trial randomized laparoscopic versus open D2-gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0) in 10 Dutch hospitals. This secondary LOGICA-analysis compared surgical and oncological outcomes after DG versus TG. DG was performed for non-proximal tumors if R0-resection was deemed achievable, TG for other tumors. Postoperative complications, mortality, hospitalization, radicality, nodal yield, 1-year survival, and EORTC-QoL-questionnaires were analyzed using Χ2-/Fisher's exact tests and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2018, 211 patients underwent DG (n = 122) or TG (n = 89), and 75% of patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DG-patients were older, had more comorbidities, less diffuse type tumors, and lower cT-stage than TG-patients (p < 0.05). DG-patients experienced fewer overall complications (34% versus 57%; p < 0.001), also after correcting for baseline differences, lower anastomotic leakage (3% versus 19%), pneumonia (4% versus 22%), atrial fibrillation (3% versus 14%), and Clavien-Dindo grading compared to TG-patients (p < 0.05), and demonstrated shorter median hospital stay (6 versus 8 days; p < 0.001). QoL was better after DG (statistically significant and clinically relevant) in most 1-year postoperative time points. DG-patients showed 98% R0-resections, and similar 30-/90-day mortality, nodal yield (28 versus 30 nodes; p = 0.490), and 1-year survival after correcting for baseline differences (p = 0.084) compared to TG-patients.

CONCLUSIONS

If oncologically feasible, DG should be preferred over TG due to less complications, faster postoperative recovery, and better QoL while achieving equivalent oncological effectiveness. Distal D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer resulted in less complications, shorter hospitalization, quicker recovery and better quality of life compared to total D2-gastrectomy, whereas radicality, nodal yield and survival were similar.

Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach-D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence by conducting a comprehensive literature review and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. The analysis includes studies, clinical trials, and systematic reviews that assess survival outcomes, morbidity, and quality of life. The selected studies revealed different outcomes associated with D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy, including lymph node harvest, disease control, recurrence rates, and overall survival. Postoperative complications also varied between the two techniques. These findings highlight the complex considerations involved in selecting the most suitable lymphadenectomy approach for individual patients. Therefore, the decision requires an individualized assessment that considers the potential benefits and risks of D1 and D2 techniques. A collaborative approach involving interdisciplinary teams is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans that optimize both oncological outcomes and postoperative quality of life.

A Novel ypTLM Staging System Based on LODDS for Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Multicenter and Large-Sample Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of the eighth AJCC ypTNM staging system on the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is controversial. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel staging system using the log odds of positive lymph nodes scheme (LODDS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 606 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy was conducted as the development cohort. (Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital (n = 183), Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital (n = 169), Mayo Clinic (n = 236), Lanzhou University First Hospital (n = 18)). The validation cohort came from the SEER database (n = 1701). A novel ypTLoddsS (ypTLM) staging system was established using the 3-year overall survival. The predictive performance of two systems was compared.

RESULTS

Two-step multivariate Cox regression analysis in both cohorts showed that ypTLM was an independent predictor of overall survival of GC patients after neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.30-1.88, p < 0.001). In the development cohort, ypTLM had better discrimination ability than ypTNM (C-index: 0.663 vs 0.633, p < 0.001), better prediction homogeneity (LR: 97.7 vs. 70.9), and better prediction accuracy (BIC: 3067.01 vs 3093.82; NRI: 0.36). In the validation cohort, ypTLM had a better prognostic predictive ability (C-index: 0.614 vs 0.588, p < 0.001; LR: 11,909.05 vs. 11,975.75; BIC: 13,263.71 vs 13,328.24; NRI: 0.22). The time-dependent ROC curve shows that the predictive performance of ypTLM is better than ypTNM, and the analysis of the decision curve shows that ypTLM achieved better net benefits.

CONCLUSION

A LODDS-based ypTLM staging system based on multicenter data was established and validated. The predictive performance was superior to the eighth AJCC ypTNM staging system.

MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL AFTER PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN GASTRIC CANCER: A STUDY USING THE BECKER'S CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The multimodal approach with perioperative chemotherapy is currently the recommended treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. This treatment induces a histopathological response expressed either through the degree of regression of the primary tumor or of the lymph nodes or through yTNM staging. Despite its advantages, there are still doubts regarding the effects of chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality.

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the impact of perioperative chemotherapy and its effect on anatomopathological results and postoperative morbidity and on patient survival.

METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study on 134 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and curative radical surgery. The degree of histological regression of the primary tumor was evaluated according to Becker's criteria; the proportion of regressed lymph nodes was determined, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival times were compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Mantel-Cox log-rank test.

RESULTS

In all, 22.3% of the patients were classified as good responders and 75.9% as poor responders. This variable was not correlated with operative morbidity (p=1.68); 64.2% of patients had invaded lymph nodes and 46.3% had regressed lymph nodes; and 49.4% had no lymphatic invasion and 61.9% had no signs of venous invasion. Postoperative complications occurred in 30.6% of the patients. The group of good responders had an average survival of 56.0 months and the group of poor responders had 34.0 months (p=0.17).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative chemotherapy induces regression in both the primary tumor and lymph nodes. The results of the operative morbidity were similar to those described in the literature. However, although the group of good responders showed better survival, this value was not significant. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate the importance of the degree of lymph node regression and its impact on the survival of these patients.

Preoperative chemotherapy combined with para-aortic lymph node dissection has clinical value in the treatment of gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastases

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastases often occur in advanced gastric cancer, with some patients presenting with metastases in the para-aortic lymph nodes. There are persistent Controversies about the benefit of para-aortic lymph node dissection (PAND). Our purpose is to probe whether PAND following preoperative chemotherapy had any clinical significance in individuals with PALNs in gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 86 gastric cancer patients (40 in the D2 + PAND group and 46 in the D2 group) who attended the abdominal surgery department of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between September 1, 2008, and July 30, 2018.

RESULTS

In the D2 + PAND group (40 cases), the average number of lymph nodes cleared per case was 4.3 in group 16 (16a2, 16b1), and the postoperative pathology confirmed lymph node positivity in 16 cases, with a metastasis rate of 40%. The median overall survival times were 63 and 34 months for the patients in the D2 + PAND group and D2 group, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) compared to the D2 group (D2 + PAND 69.1% vs. D2 50%, P = 0.012) and a statistically significant difference in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (D2 + PAND 69.6% vs. D2 38.3%, P = 0.007). Lymph node dissection extent and recurrence of para-aortic lymph nodes were independent prognostic variables for the patients. The recurrence rate was reduced in the D2 + PAND group compared to the D2 group (D2 + PAND 7.5% vs. D2 26.1%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with gastric cancer whose imaging suggests metastasis in the para-aortic lymph nodes, preoperative chemotherapy combined with PAND is an effective and safe treatment that may benefit patient survival.

Treatments for resectable esophageal cancer: from traditional systemic therapy to immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer (EC) has a high incidence and poor prognosis. The two major histological types, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, differ in their epidemiology and treatment options. Patients with locally advanced EC benefit from multimodal therapy concepts including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy. Currently, immunotherapy for the solid tumor is a hot spot. Treatment with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is the first immunotherapy for resectable EC listed in the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for the Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers. Recent clinical trials have established ICIs for three treatment models of resectable EC. Their short-term results demonstrated ideal efficacy and tolerable toxicity, though some concerns remain. This review summarizes the novel data on the ICIs for resectable EC and lists the registered related clinical trials. Hopefully, this review can provide a reference for ongoing research on the treatment options for resectable EC.

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review is to identify patient-related, perioperative and technical risk factors for esophago-jejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases was performed. Studies providing factors predictive of EJAL by uni- and multivariate analysis or an estimate of association between EJAL and related risk factors were included. All studies were assessed for methodological quality, and a narrative synthesis of the results was performed. A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 42,489 patients who underwent gastrectomy with esophago-jejunal anastomosis. Age, BMI, impaired respiratory function, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), alcohol consumption, chronic renal failure, diabetes and mixed-type histology were identified as patient-related risk factors for EJAL at multivariate analysis. Likewise, among operative factors, laparoscopic approach, anastomosis type, additional organ resection, blood loss, intraoperative time and surgeon experience were found to be predictive factors for the development of EJAL. In clinical setting, we are able to identify several risk factors for EJAL. This can improve the recognition of higher-risk patients and their outcomes.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical curative effects and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer compared to those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy were performed in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Results

Seven RCTs were included (601 patients; 302 in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 299 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group). The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group had an increased number of patients with a complete response [odds ratio (OR) = 3.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68–8.54, p = 0.001] and improved objective response rate (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.69–4.57, p < 0.0001), 1-year (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.40–8.81, p = 0.007) and 3-year (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.30–3.50, p = 0.003) survival rates, R0 resection rate (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.39–3.50, p = 0.0008), and complete pathologic response (OR = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.59–12.14, p = 0.004). Regarding the incidence of adverse effects after neoadjuvant therapy, only the occurrence rate of gastrointestinal reaction in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group was higher than that in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.09–2.85, p = 0.02), and there was no significant difference in other adverse effects. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer has several advantages in terms of efficacy and safety compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has great potential as an effective therapy for resectable gastric cancers.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0164, registration number INPLASY202230164.

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy followed by laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in Western population: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched study

Background and Objectives

In the setting of a minimally invasive approach, we aimed to compare short and long‐term postoperative outcomes of patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) + surgery or upfront surgery in Western population.

Methods

All consecutive patients from six Italian and one Serbian center with locally advanced gastric cancer who had undergone laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were selected between 2005 and 2019. After propensity score‐matching, postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes were investigated.

Results

After matching, 97 patients were allocated in each cohort with a mean age of 69.4 and 70.5 years. The two groups showed no difference in operative details except for a higher conversion rate in the NAT group (p = 0.038). The overall postoperative complications rate significantly differed between NAT + surgery (38.1%) and US (21.6%) group (p = 0.019). NAT was found to be related to a higher risk of postoperative morbidity in patients older than 60 years old (p = 0.013) but not in patients younger (p = 0.620). Conversely, no difference in overall survival (p = 0.41) and disease‐free‐survival (p = 0.34) was found between groups.

Conclusions

NAT appears to be related to a higher postoperative complication rate and equivalent oncological outcomes when compared with surgery alone. However, poor short‐term outcomes are more evident in patients over 60 years old receiving NAT.

Could neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase postoperative complication risk of laparoscopic total gastrectomy? A mono-institutional propensity score-matched study in China

BACKGROUND

The potential survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in patients with advanced gastric cancer has been widely recognized. With the development of minimally invasive surgery, which is represented by laparoscopy, the effect of NC on the safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy remains to be further explored.

AIM

To compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) after NC (NC-LTG) with LTG alone.

METHODS

A total of 92 patients who underwent NC-LTG and 381 patients who received LTG alone at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between September 2015 and September 2020 were retrospectively included in our study. We used propensity-score matching (PSM) to balance baseline bias. After 1:1 PSM, 73 patients were included in each group with no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The NC-LTG group exhibited a longer operation time (244.10 ± 48.13 min vs 225.74 ± 45.33 min, P = 0.019) and increased intraoperative blood loss [150 (100-300) mL vs 100 (100-200) mL, P = 0.011] compared to the LTG group. The 30-d postoperative morbidity of the NC-LTG group was 20.5% (15/73), and that of the LTG group was 13.7% (10/73). There were no significant differences in 30-d severe complication rates or anastomotic leakage rates. Subgroup analysis showed that the patients with pTNM (pathological tumor-node-metastasis classification) T0N0-II in the NC-LTG group underwent a longer operation than the LTG group, while no significant difference was found in any perioperative index for the pTNM III patients. A multivariate analysis showed that an operation time longer than 240 min was an independent risk factor (odds ratio = 3.021, 95% confidence interval: 1.160-7.868, P = 0.024), while NC was not an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in LTG.

CONCLUSION

Despite a longer operation time and more blood loss after NC-LTG, which indicate surgical difficulty, NC-LTG exhibits acceptable short-term outcomes compared to LTG, suggesting the safety and feasibility of NC-LTG.

Perioperative Safety and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Therapy with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel Plus Apatinib in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Purpose

The trend in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is to use more drugs or therapies in combination. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) plus apatinib in the treatment of LAGC.

Patients and Methods

We collected clinical data from patients with LAGC who received neoadjuvant FLOT and apatinib therapy and underwent surgery from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients were divided into either the FLOT group (in which patients received FLOT neoadjuvant therapy and surgery) or the FLOTA group (in which patients received FLOT plus apatinib neoadjuvant therapy and surgery).

Results

The FLOT and FLOTA groups contained 44 and 31 patients, respectively. There were significant differences between the FLOT and FLOTA groups in the objective response rate (50.00% vs. 80.65%, respectively, p = 0.008) and average change from baseline in the target lesion size (−26.16 ± 34.61 vs. −54.32 ± 36.11, respectively, p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the pretreatment clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) and post treatment cTNM stages for the FLOT group (p = 0.001) and for the FLOTA group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the FLOT and FLOTA groups in post neoadjuvant therapy cTNM stages (p = 0.525), R0 rate (p = 0.397), tumor regression grade (p = 0.397), or post treatment pathological TNM stage (p = 0.180). Some neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse events occurred significantly more frequently in the FLOTA group, including diarrhea (all grades), pain (all grades), oral mucositis (all grades), and hand-foot syndrome (all grades).

Conclusion

The FLOTA regimen can achieve better perioperative efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with that of the FLOT regimen in neoadjuvant treatment of LAGC. The FLOTA regimen for neoadjuvant therapy for LAGC merits further study.