1
|
Cannas S, Vollmer CM. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer-What Is Totality? JAMA Surg 2024; 159:828-829. [PMID: 38656533 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
This article discusses the meaning of the word total in relation to total neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Cannas
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dillon DL, Park JY, Mederos MA, Seo YJ, King J, Hines J, Donahue T, Girgis MD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved disease-free survival in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection. J Surg Oncol 2024; 130:72-82. [PMID: 38726668 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is becoming favored for all pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients with seemingly resectable disease infrequently still display vascular involvement intraoperatively. Outcomes following NAC versus upfront surgery in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with vascular resection are unknown. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of PDAC patients who underwent PD with vascular resection between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, within a single academic center. Clinicopathologic characteristics and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between NAC versus upfront surgery cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS Eighty-one patients who underwent PD with vascular resection for PDAC were included. Forty-six patients (56%) received NAC. The NAC cohort more often had pathologic N0 status (47.8% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001), had decreased vascular invasion (11% vs. 40%, p = 0.002), and completed chemotherapy (80% vs. 40%, p < 0.01). The NAC cohort demonstrated improved DFS (40.5 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.007). In multivariable analysis, NAC remained independently associated with increased DFS (HR = 0.48, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS NAC was associated with improved clinicopathologic outcomes and DFS in PD with vascular resection. These findings demonstrate the advantage of NAC in PDAC patients undergoing PD with vascular resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin L Dillon
- Department of Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joon Y Park
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael A Mederos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Young-Ji Seo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan King
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joe Hines
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Timothy Donahue
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mark D Girgis
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saúde-Conde R, El Ghali B, Navez J, Bouchart C, Van Laethem JL. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Is More Better? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2423. [PMID: 39001485 PMCID: PMC11240662 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Saúde-Conde
- Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Benjelloun El Ghali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (B.E.G.); (C.B.)
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (B.E.G.); (C.B.)
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stoop TF, Oba A, Wu YHA, Beaty LE, Colborn KL, Janssen BV, Al-Musawi MH, Franco SR, Sugawara T, Franklin O, Jain A, Saiura A, Sauvanet A, Coppola A, Javed AA, Groot Koerkamp B, Miller BN, Mack CE, Hashimoto D, Caputo D, Kleive D, Sereni E, Belfiori G, Ichida H, van Dam JL, Dembinski J, Akahoshi K, Roberts KJ, Tanaka K, Labori KJ, Falconi M, House MG, Sugimoto M, Tanabe M, Gotohda N, Krohn PS, Burkhart RA, Thakkar RG, Pande R, Dokmak S, Hirano S, Burgdorf SK, Crippa S, van Roessel S, Satoi S, White SA, Hackert T, Nguyen TK, Yamamoto T, Nakamura T, Bachu V, Burns WR, Inoue Y, Takahashi Y, Ushida Y, Aslami ZV, Verbeke CS, Fariña A, He J, Wilmink JW, Messersmith W, Verheij J, Kaplan J, Schulick RD, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M. Pathological Complete Response in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Preoperative Chemotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2417625. [PMID: 38888920 PMCID: PMC11185983 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy is increasingly used in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, leading to pathological complete response (pCR) in a small subset of patients. However, multicenter studies with in-depth data about pCR are lacking. Objective To investigate the incidence, outcome, and risk factors of pCR after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational, international, multicenter cohort study assessed all consecutive patients with pathology-proven localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) in 19 centers from 8 countries (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018). Data collection was performed from February 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, and analyses from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Median follow-up was 19 months. Exposures Preoperative chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) followed by resection. Main Outcomes and Measures The incidence of pCR (defined as absence of vital tumor cells in the sampled pancreas specimen after resection), its association with OS from surgery, and factors associated with pCR. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and pCR were investigated with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, respectively. Results Overall, 1758 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; 879 [50.0%] male) were studied. The rate of pCR was 4.8% (n = 85), and pCR was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.83). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95%, 82%, and 63% in patients with pCR vs 80%, 46%, and 30% in patients without pCR, respectively (P < .001). Factors associated with pCR included preoperative multiagent chemotherapy other than (m)FOLFIRINOX ([modified] leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.87), preoperative conventional radiotherapy (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.00-4.10), preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (OR, 8.91; 95% CI, 4.17-19.05), radiologic response (OR, 13.00; 95% CI, 7.02-24.08), and normal(ized) serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after preoperative therapy (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.79-7.89). Conclusions and Relevance This international, retrospective cohort study found that pCR occurred in 4.8% of patients with resected localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Although pCR does not reflect cure, it is associated with improved OS, with a doubled 5-year OS of 63% compared with 30% in patients without pCR. Factors associated with pCR related to preoperative chemo(radio)therapy regimens and anatomical and biological disease response features may have implications for treatment strategies that require validation in prospective studies because they may not universally apply to all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Stoop
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y. H. Andrew Wu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laurel E. Beaty
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Kathryn L. Colborn
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Boris V. Janssen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed H. Al-Musawi
- Clinical Trials of Office, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Salvador Rodriguez Franco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Oskar Franklin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ajay Jain
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Ammar A. Javed
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Braden N. Miller
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Claudia E. Mack
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Damiano Caputo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabetta Sereni
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Truty, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Hirofumi Ichida
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jacob L. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Keiichi Akahoshi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kimitaka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Knut J. Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Michael G. House
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Motokazu Sugimoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Paul S. Krohn
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rohan G. Thakkar
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rupaly Pande
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Stefan K. Burgdorf
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Stijn van Roessel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Trang K. Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Toru Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Vismaya Bachu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William R. Burns
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Ushida
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Zohra V. Aslami
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Caroline S. Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arantza Fariña
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Johanna W. Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wells Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Kaplan
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Richard D. Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ward EP, Vincent-Sheldon S, Tolat P, Kulkarni N, Aldakkak M, Budithi R, Clarke CN, Tsai S, Evans DB, Christians KK. Median arcuate ligament release at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Surgery 2024; 175:1386-1393. [PMID: 38413302 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Celiac artery compression can complicate the performance of pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy due to the need for ligation of the gastroduodenal artery. Median arcuate ligament release restores normal arterial flow to the liver, spleen, and stomach and may avoid complications related to poor perfusion of the foregut. METHODS All patients who underwent median arcuate ligament release for celiac artery compression at the time of pancreatectomy between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography was used to categorize celiac artery compression by the extent of compression (types A [<50%], B [50%-80%], and C [>80%]). RESULTS Of 695 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 22 (3%) had celiac artery compression, and a majority (17) were identified on preoperative imaging. Median celiac artery compression was 52% (interquartile range = 18); 8 (36%) patients had type A and 14 (64%) had type B compression with a median celiac artery compression of 39% (interquartile range = 18) and 59% (interquartile range = 14), respectively (P < .001). Postoperative imaging was available for 20 (90%) patients, and a reduction in the median celiac artery compression occurred in all patients: type A, 14%, and type B, 31%. Complications included 1 (5%) death after hospital discharge, 1 (5%) pancreatic fistula, 1 (5%) delayed gastric emptying, and 4 (18%) readmissions. No patient had evidence of a biliary leak or liver dysfunction. CONCLUSION Preoperative computed tomography allows accurate identification of celiac artery compression. Ligation of the gastroduodenal artery during pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy in the setting of celiac artery compression requires median arcuate ligament release to restore normal arterial flow to the foregut and avoid preventable complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin P Ward
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan Tsai
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davis CH, Augustinus S, de Graaf N, Wellner UF, Johansen K, Andersson B, Beane JD, Björnsson B, Busch OR, Gleeson EM, van Santvoort HC, Tingstedt B, Williamsson C, Keck T, Besselink MG, Koerkamp BG, Pitt HA. Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Transatlantic Trend and Postoperative Outcomes Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:613-621. [PMID: 38224148 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of modern chemotherapy a decade ago has led to increased use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A recent North American study demonstrated increased use of NAT and improved operative outcomes in patients with PDAC. The aims of this study were to compare the use of NAT and short-term outcomes in patients with PDAC undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) among registries from the US and Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. STUDY DESIGN Databases from 2 multicenter (voluntary) and 2 nationwide (mandatory) registries were queried from 2018 to 2020. Patients undergoing PD for PDAC were compared based on the use of upfront surgery vs NAT. Adoption of NAT was measured in each country over time. Thirty-day outcomes, including the composite measure (ideal outcomes), were compared by multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses of patients undergoing vascular resection were performed. RESULTS Overall, 11,402 patients underwent PD for PDAC with 33.7% of patients receiving NAT. The use of NAT increased steadily from 28.3% in 2018 to 38.5% in 2020 (p < 0.0001). However, use of NAT varied widely by country: the US (46.8%), the Netherlands (44.9%), Sweden (11.0%), and Germany (7.8%). On multivariable analysis, NAT was significantly (p < 0.01) associated with reduced rates of serious morbidity, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulae, reoperations, and increased ideal outcomes. These associations remained on sensitivity analysis of patients undergoing vascular resection. CONCLUSIONS NAT before PD for pancreatic cancer varied widely among 4 Western audits yet increased by 26% during 3 years. NAT was associated with improved short-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Davis
- From the Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX (Davis)
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Augustinus, de Graaf, Busch, Besselink)
| | - Nine de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Augustinus, de Graaf, Busch, Besselink)
| | - Ulrich F Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ/Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus, Lübeck, Germany (Wellner, Keck)
| | - Karin Johansen
- Departments of Surgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (Johansen, Björnsson, Tingstedt, Williamsson)
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (Andersson)
- Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (Andersson)
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (Beane)
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Departments of Surgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (Johansen, Björnsson, Tingstedt, Williamsson)
| | - Olivier R Busch
- From the Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX (Davis)
| | - Elizabeth M Gleeson
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (Gleeson)
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands (van Santvoort)
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Departments of Surgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (Johansen, Björnsson, Tingstedt, Williamsson)
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Departments of Surgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (Johansen, Björnsson, Tingstedt, Williamsson)
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ/Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus, Lübeck, Germany (Wellner, Keck)
| | - Marc G Besselink
- From the Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX (Davis)
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Koerkamp)
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Pitt)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clements HA, Underwood TJ, Petty RD. Total neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:9-18. [PMID: 37898721 PMCID: PMC10781745 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02458-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction represent a large burden of cancer death in the Western World with an increasing incidence. In the past two decades, the overall survival of patients on a potentially curative treatment pathway has more than doubled due to the addition of perioperative oncological therapies to surgery. However, patients often fail to respond to oncological treatment or struggle to complete their treatment after surgery. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for total neoadjuvant therapy and options for assessment of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hollie A Clements
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
| | - Tim J Underwood
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Russell D Petty
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Akahori T, Terai T, Nagai M, Nakamura K, Kohara Y, Yasuda S, Matsuo Y, Doi S, Sakata T, Sho M. Total neoadjuvant therapy improves survival of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial involvement. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:151-162. [PMID: 38250684 PMCID: PMC10797818 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial involvement (BR-A) pancreatic cancer. Methods We analyzed 81 patients initially diagnosed as BR-A who received initial treatments between 2007 and 2021. Among them, 18 patients who received upfront surgery were classified as the UFS group, while 30 patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were classified as the NACRT group. Furthermore, 33 patients who planned to receive a combination treatment of over 6 months of systemic chemotherapies followed by chemoradiotherapy before surgery were classified as the TNT group. Results There were no significant differences in the patients' backgrounds between the three groups at the time of initial treatment. The resection rates of the UFS, NACRT, and TNT groups were 89%, 77%, and 67%, respectively. NACRT had no impact on the prognosis compared to upfront surgery. In sharp contrast, the TNT group had a significantly better prognosis compared to the other groups, especially after pancreatic resection. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that TNT and resection were independent prognostic factors for the patients of BR-A. Conclusion TNT can be a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with BR-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Taichi Terai
- Department of SurgeryNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of SurgeryNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
| | - Kota Nakamura
- Department of SurgeryNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
| | | | | | - Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of SurgeryNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
| | - Shunsuke Doi
- Department of SurgeryNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
| | | | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of SurgeryNara Medical UniversityNaraJapan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kolbeinsson HM, Chandana S, Wright GP, Chung M. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Current Treatment and Novel Therapies. J INVEST SURG 2023; 36:2129884. [PMID: 36191926 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2129884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes for cancer-related deaths in the United States. Majority of patients present with unresectable or metastatic disease. For those that present with localized disease, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to maximize survival and optimize outcomes. The quality and safety of surgery for pancreatic cancer have improved in recent years with increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques and surgical adjuncts. Systemic chemotherapy has also evolved to impact survival. It is now increasingly being utilized in the neoadjuvant setting, often with concomitant radiation. Increased utilization of genomic testing in metastatic pancreatic cancer has led to better understanding of their biology, thereby allowing clinicians to consider potential targeted therapies. Similarly, targeted agents such as PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint- inhibitors have emerged with promising results. In summary, pancreatic cancer remains a disease with poor long-term survival. However, recent developments have led to improved outcomes and have changed practice in the past decade. This review summarizes current practices in pancreatic cancer treatment and the milestones that brought us to where we are today, along with emerging therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hordur Mar Kolbeinsson
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Sreenivasa Chandana
- Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Michigan, PC, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - G Paul Wright
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Mathew Chung
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dong X, Wang K, Yang H, Cheng R, Li Y, Hou Y, Chang J, Yuan L. The Nomogram predicting the overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiotherapy: a study based on the SEER database and a Chinese cohort. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1266318. [PMID: 37955009 PMCID: PMC10634587 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1266318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) have a poor prognosis. Radiotherapy (RT) is a standard palliative treatment in clinical practice, and there is no effective clinical prediction model to predict the prognosis of PC patients receiving radiotherapy. This study aimed to analyze PC's clinical characteristics, find the factors affecting PC patients' prognosis, and construct a visual Nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). Methods SEER*Stat software was used to collect clinical data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of 3570 patients treated with RT. At the same time, the relevant clinical data of 115 patients were collected from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The SEER database data were randomly divided into the training and internal validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio, with all patients at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University as the external validation cohort. The lasso regression was used to screen the relevant variables. All non-zero variables were included in the multivariate analysis. Multivariate Cox proportional risk regression analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic factors. The Kaplan-Meier(K-M) method was used to plot the survival curves for different treatments (surgery, RT, chemotherapy, and combination therapy) and calculate the median OS. The Nomogram was constructed to predict the survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years, and the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were plotted with the calculated curves. Calculate the area under the curve (AUC), the Bootstrap method was used to plot the calibration curve, and the clinical efficacy of the prediction model was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Results The median OS was 25.0, 18.0, 11.0, and 4.0 months in the surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), surgery combined with radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and RT alone cohorts, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age, N stage, M stage, chemotherapy, surgery, lymph node surgery, and Grade were independent prognostic factors for patients. Nomogram models were constructed to predict patients' OS. 1-, 3-, and 5-year Time-dependent ROC curves were plotted, and AUC values were calculated. The results suggested that the AUCs were 0.77, 0.79, and 0.79 for the training cohort, 0.79, 0.82, and 0.81 for the internal validation cohort, and 0.73, 0.93, and 0.88 for the external validation cohort. The calibration curves Show that the model prediction probability is in high agreement with the actual observation probability, and the DCA curve shows a high net return. Conclusion SCRT significantly improves the OS of PC patients. We developed and validated a Nomogram to predict the OS of PC patients receiving RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaotao Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Kunlun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Ruilan Cheng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Yanqi Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Jiali Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Ling Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagai M, Nakamura K, Terai T, Kohara Y, Yasuda S, Matsuo Y, Doi S, Sakata T, Sho M. Significance of multiple tumor markers measurements in conversion surgery for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2023; 23:721-728. [PMID: 37328387 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the significance of multiple tumor markers (TMs) measurements in determining the indications for conversion surgery (CS) in the management of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPC). METHODS A total of 103 patients with UR-LAPC, treated between 2008 and June 2021, were enrolled in this study. Three TMs, including carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and Duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2), were measured. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (24%) underwent CS. The median preoperative treatment period was 9.5 months. The median survival time (MST) from the initial treatment for patients with CS was significantly longer than that for patients without surgery (34.6 vs. 18.9 months, P < 0.001). The number of elevated TMs before CS was one in five patients and two in five patients, while 15 patients had normal levels of all three TMs. Notably, the MST from the initial treatment for patients with all three preoperative normal TMs levels was favorable for 70.5 months. In contrast, patients with one or two preoperatively elevated TMs levels had a significantly worse prognosis (25.4 and 21.0 months, respectively, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the relapse-free survival of patients with three preoperative normal TMs levels was significantly longer than those with one or two elevated TMs levels (21.9 vs. 11.3 or 3.0 months, respectively, P < 0.001). Non-normal values of all TMs before CS were identified as independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous measurement and assessment of the three TMs levels may help determine the surgical indications for UR-LAPC after systemic anticancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Kota Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Taichi Terai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Doi
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sakata
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schepis T, De Lucia SS, Pellegrino A, Del Gaudio A, Maresca R, Coppola G, Chiappetta MF, Gasbarrini A, Franceschi F, Candelli M, Nista EC. State-of-the-Art and Upcoming Innovations in Pancreatic Cancer Care: A Step Forward to Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3423. [PMID: 37444534 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains a social and medical burden despite the tremendous advances that medicine has made in the last two decades. The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing, and it continues to be associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. The difficulty of early diagnosis (the lack of specific symptoms and biomarkers at early stages), the aggressiveness of the disease, and its resistance to systemic therapies are the main factors for the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. The only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgery, but the vast majority of patients with pancreatic cancer have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Pancreatic surgery is among the most challenging surgical procedures, but recent improvements in surgical techniques, careful patient selection, and the availability of minimally invasive techniques (e.g., robotic surgery) have dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic surgery. Patients who are not candidates for surgery may benefit from locoregional and systemic therapy. In some cases (e.g., patients for whom marginal resection is feasible), systemic therapy may be considered a bridge to surgery to allow downstaging of the cancer; in other cases (e.g., metastatic disease), systemic therapy is considered the standard approach with the goal of prolonging patient survival. The complexity of patients with pancreatic cancer requires a personalized and multidisciplinary approach to choose the best treatment for each clinical situation. The aim of this article is to provide a literature review of the available treatments for the different stages of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Schepis
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Sofia De Lucia
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pellegrino
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Del Gaudio
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Maresca
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gaetano Coppola
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Francesco Chiappetta
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Promise, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- IBD-Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Franceschi
- Department of Emergency Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Universitaria Policlinico Agostino Gemelli di Roma, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Candelli
- Department of Emergency Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Universitaria Policlinico Agostino Gemelli di Roma, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Celestino Nista
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Słodkowski M, Wroński M, Karkocha D, Kraj L, Śmigielska K, Jachnis A. Current Approaches for the Curative-Intent Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092584. [PMID: 37174050 PMCID: PMC10177138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer. However, only up to 20% of patients are considered eligible for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis. Although upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy has become the gold standard of treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer there are numerous ongoing trials aiming to compare the clinical outcomes of various surgical strategies (e.g., upfront surgery or neoadjuvant treatment with subsequent resection). Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery is considered the best approach in borderline resectable pancreatic tumors. Individuals with locally advanced disease are now candidates for palliative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy; however, some patients may become eligible for resection during the course of such treatment. When metastases are found, the cancer is qualified as unresectable. It is possible to perform radical pancreatic resection with metastasectomy in selected cases of oligometastatic disease. The role of multi-visceral resection, which involves reconstruction of major mesenteric veins, is well known. Nonetheless, there are some controversies in terms of arterial resection and reconstruction. Researchers are also trying to introduce personalized treatments. The careful, preliminary selection of patients eligible for surgery and other therapies should be based on tumor biology, among other factors. Such selection may play a key role in improving survival rates in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Słodkowski
- Department of General, Gastroenterologic and Oncologic Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Jastrzębiec, Poland
| | - Marek Wroński
- Department of General, Gastroenterologic and Oncologic Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dominika Karkocha
- Department of General, Gastroenterologic and Oncologic Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Leszek Kraj
- Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Jastrzębiec, Poland
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kaja Śmigielska
- Department of General, Gastroenterologic and Oncologic Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aneta Jachnis
- Department of General, Gastroenterologic and Oncologic Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Scordilli M, Michelotti A, Zara D, Palmero L, Alberti M, Noto C, Totaro F, Foltran L, Guardascione M, Iacono D, Ongaro E, Fasola G, Puglisi F. Preoperative treatments in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current evidence and new perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:104013. [PMID: 37116817 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery is the only curative treatment for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but less than 20% of patients present a resectable disease at diagnosis. Treatment strategies and disease definition for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) vary in the different cancer centres. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care for both BRPC and LAPC patients, however literature data are still controversial concerning the type, dose and duration of the different CT regimens, as well as regarding the integration of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) in the therapeutic algorithm. In this unsettled debate, we aimed at focusing on the therapeutic regimens currently in use and relative literature data, to report international trials comparing the available therapeutic options or explore the introduction of new pharmacological agents, and to analyse possible new scenarios in microenvironment evaluation before and after neoadjuvant therapies or in patients' selection at a molecular level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco de Scordilli
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Anna Michelotti
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Diego Zara
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Lorenza Palmero
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Martina Alberti
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Claudia Noto
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Fabiana Totaro
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Luisa Foltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Michela Guardascione
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Donatella Iacono
- Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Elena Ongaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Gianpiero Fasola
- Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu HY, Li JW, Li JZ, Zhai QL, Ye JY, Zheng SY, Fang K. Comprehensive multimodal management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Current status and progress. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:142-162. [PMID: 36896309 PMCID: PMC9988647 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a complex clinical entity with specific biological features. Criteria for resectability need to be assessed in combination with tumor anatomy and oncology. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for BRPC patients is associated with additional survival benefits. Research is currently focused on exploring the optimal NAT regimen and more reliable ways of assessing response to NAT. More attention to management standards during NAT, including biliary drainage and nutritional support, is needed. Surgery remains the cornerstone of BRPC treatment and multidisciplinary teams can help to evaluate whether patients are suitable for surgery and provide individualized management during the perioperative period, including NAT responsiveness and the selection of surgical timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Yu Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jin-Wei Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou 545000, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Jin-Zheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Qi-Long Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jing-Yuan Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Si-Yuan Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Kun Fang
- Department of Surgery, Yinchuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yinchuan 750000, Ningxia, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hammad AY, Hodges JC, AlMasri S, Paniccia A, Lee KK, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Ellsworth SG, Aldakkak M, Evans DB, Tsai S, Zureikat A. Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Surgically Resected Pancreatic Carcinoma With Node-Negative Disease After Neoadjuvant Therapy. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:55-62. [PMID: 36416848 PMCID: PMC9685551 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is rarely associated with a complete histopathologic response in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but results in downstaging of regional nodal disease. Such nodal downstaging after NAT may have implications for the use of additional adjuvant therapy (AT). Objectives To examine the prognostic implications of AT in patients with node-negative (N0) disease after NAT and to identify factors associated with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective review was conducted using data from 2 high-volume, tertiary care academic centers (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the Medical College of Wisconsin). Prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer databases at both institutes were searched to identify patients with localized PDAC treated with preoperative therapy and subsequent surgical resection between 2010 and 2019, with N0 disease on final histopathology. Exposures Patients received NAT consisting of chemotherapy with or without concomitant neoadjuvant radiation (NART). For patients who received NART, chemotherapy regimens were gemcitabine or 5-fluoururacil based and included stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after all intended chemotherapy and approximately 4 to 5 weeks before anticipated surgery. Adjuvant therapy consisted of gemcitabine-based therapy or FOLFIRINOX; when used, adjuvant radiation was commonly administered as either SBRT or IMRT. Main Outcomes and Measures The association of AT with PFS and OS was evaluated in the overall cohort and in different subgroups. The interaction between AT and other clinicopathologic variables was examined on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results In this cohort study, 430 consecutive patients were treated between 2010 and 2019. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 65.2 (9.4) years, and 220 (51.2%) were women. The predominant NAT was gemcitabine based (196 patients [45.6%]), with a median duration of 2.7 cycles (IQR, 1.5-3.4). Neoadjuvant radiation was administered to 279 patients (64.9%). Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 310 patients (72.1%), and 160 (37.2%) required concomitant vascular resection. The median lymph node yield was 26 (IQR, 19-34); perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and residual positive margins (R1) were found in 254 (59.3%), 92 (22.0%), and 87 (21.1%) patients, respectively. The restricted mean OS was 5.2 years (95% CI, 4.8-5.7). On adjusted analysis, PNI, LVI, and poorly differentiated tumors were independently associated with worse PFS and OS in N0 disease after NAT, with hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 2.04 (1.43-2.92; P < .001) and 1.68 (1.14-2.48; P = .009), 1.47 (1.08-1.98; P = .01) and 1.54 (1.10-2.14; P = .01), and 1.90 (1.18-3.07; P = .008) and 1.98 (1.20-3.26; P = .008), respectively. Although AT was associated with prolonged survival in the overall cohort, the effect was reduced in patients who received NART and strengthened in patients with PNI (AT × PNI interaction: hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32-0.97]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest a survival benefit for AT in patients with N0 disease after NAT and surgical resection. This survival benefit may be most pronounced in patients with PNI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrahman Y Hammad
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacob C Hodges
- Wolff Center at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samer AlMasri
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan Bahary
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohammed Aldakkak
- LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Douglas B Evans
- LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Susan Tsai
- LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A review of the evidence. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2022; 67:102305. [PMID: 36223686 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy that carries a poor prognosis because the majority of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. However, even patients who are fortunate enough to present with resectable disease are often plagued by high recurrence rates. While adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence after surgery, post operative complications and poor performance status after surgery prevent up to 50% of patients from receiving it. Given the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with borderline resectable disease, it is understandable that neoadjuvant therapy has been steadily increasing in patients with resectable cancers as well. In this review paper, we highlight the rational and existing evidence of using neoadjuvant therapy in all patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
18
|
Barrak D, Villano AM, Moslim MA, Hopkins SE, Lefton MD, Ruth K, Reddy SS. Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Limited Lymph Node Yield but Improved Ratio. J Surg Res 2022; 280:543-550. [PMID: 36096019 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) of nodal metastases following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported as prognostic parameters in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, they have not been compared in the setting of various neoadjuvant therapy modalities. METHODS A single institutional retrospective study identified 134 patients diagnosed with resectable, BLR- and LA-PDAC who underwent PD at Fox Chase Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized based on first-line treatment as follows: surgery first (SF), total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and single modality neoadjuvant therapy (SMNT). The histopathological reports of the surgical specimens were examined to obtain LNY and determine the counts of lymph nodes with metastases. Subsequently, LNR was calculated as the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the number of lymph nodes examined. RESULTS Overall, 49, 38, 27, 12, and 8 patients underwent SF approach, SMNT, incomplete TNT, induction TNT, and consolidation TNT, respectively. There was no difference in R0 resection and vascular resection between the groups (P = 0.096 and 0.794, respectively). The median counts of LNY were 22, 15, 21, 11.5, and 10, respectively (P < 0.001). The average LNR was 0.16, 0.07, 0.03, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively (P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in overall survival in the TNT groups (log-rank test P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS PDAC patients who undergo the TNT modality exhibit lower LNY and improved LNR compared with the SF approach and SMNT neoadjuvant therapy groups. This is likely explained by the increased treatment response and lymph node obliteration associated with the TNT approach. Our results question the minimal requirement of 11-18 harvested lymph nodes for PD following TNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dany Barrak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony M Villano
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maitham A Moslim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven E Hopkins
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Max D Lefton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen Ruth
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sanjay S Reddy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been enthusiastically embraced for patients with operable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) in hopes of improving survival. However, the rapid integration of clinical trial data has made it difficult to discern optimal treatment strategies. The goal of this review is to summarize notable recent trials and their contributions to the field. RECENT FINDINGS The results of ESPAC-5F, NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113, SWOG1505, PREOPANC, HyperAcutePancreas, and ALLIANCE A021501 are reviewed in detail. These studies sequentially evaluate the different neoadjuvant treatment strategies, use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and immunotherapy in resectable, borderline-resectable, and locally advanced PDAC. Resection rate ranged from 24.4 to 95.7% (median 64.9%). These trials demonstrate median survival ranging from 14.9 to 41.0 months with progression-free survival ranging from 7.7 to 24.2 months. Survival results may be confounded by ability to reach resection, use of modern chemotherapy vs. gemcitabine monotherapy, and inclusion of locally advanced PDAC. Several upcoming trials will directly examine efficacy of NAT vs. adjuvant therapy, chemoradiation in the NAT setting, and molecular testing-driven chemotherapy selection. SUMMARY NAT is associated with improved survival for patients with borderline resectable PDAC but broader efficacy for resectable PDAC and optimal treatment strategy have yet to be defined.
Collapse
|
20
|
Villano AM, O’Halloran E, Goel N, Ruth K, Barrak D, Lefton M, Reddy SS. Total neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved overall survival and pathologic response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:502-512. [PMID: 35476892 PMCID: PMC9340441 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) compared with single modality neoadjuvant therapy (SMNT) or surgery first (SF) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS A single-institution retrospective review of PDAC patients who underwent pancreatectomy was conducted (1993-2019). Overall survival (OS) estimates from diagnosis and from surgery were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods; Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for covariates. RESULTS Surgery was performed upfront (SF) in 168 (46.9%), while 111 (31.0%) had chemotherapy or chemoradiation before resection (SMNT), and 79 (22.1%) underwent TNT (chemotherapy and chemoradiation). Resection margins were more frequently R0 in the TNT group (86.1%) compared with SMNT (64.0%) and SF (72%) (p < 0.001). Complete pathologic response was more common in the TNT group (10.1%) compared with SMNT (3.6%) or SF (0.6%) (p = 0.001), resulting in prolonged survival (median OS = 100.2 months). TNT patients demonstrated longer median OS from surgery (33.6 months) compared with SF (19.1 months) and SMNT (17.4 months) (p = 0.010), which persisted after controlling for covariates. CONCLUSIONS TNT is associated with more frequent complete pathologic response, a higher rate of margin negative resection, and prolonged OS as compared with SF or SMNT. Additional studies to identify subgroups that derive the greatest benefit are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M. Villano
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eileen O’Halloran
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Neha Goel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Karen Ruth
- Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dany Barrak
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Max Lefton
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sanjay S. Reddy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mickel TA, Kutlu OC, Silberfein EJ, Hsu C, Chai CY, Fisher WE, Van Buren G, Camp ER. Factors associated with inability to return to intended oncologic treatment in pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 2022; 224:635-640. [PMID: 35249728 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.02.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) has been proposed as a quality metric in the care of cancer patients. We sought to define factors associated with inability to RIOT in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. METHODS The NCDB was queried for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pathologic stage IB, IIA, or IIB PDAC from 2010 to 2016. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identified factors associated with failure to RIOT, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariable regression models demonstrated the impact of failure to RIOT on survival. RESULTS Increasing age (p < .001), Hispanic race (p = .002), pathological stage IB (p = .004) and IIA (p = .001) as compared to IIB, increasing hospital stay (p < .001), and open surgical approach (p = .024) were associated with increased risk of inability to RIOT. Male sex (p < .001), Charlson-Deyo scores of 0 (p < .001) and 1 (p = .001) as compared to >2, negative surgical margins (p = .048), receiving care at academic institutions (p = .001), and increasing institutional case volume (p = .001) were associated with improved odds of RIOT. CONCLUSIONS Patient features can impact RIOT and should be considered when designing multi-modality treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Alston Mickel
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Clinical Sciences Building Suite 420, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Onur C Kutlu
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14(th) St f4, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Eric J Silberfein
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St 7th Floor Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Cary Hsu
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St 7th Floor Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Christy Y Chai
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St 7th Floor Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - William E Fisher
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St 7th Floor Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - George Van Buren
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St 7th Floor Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - E Ramsay Camp
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St 7th Floor Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Turner KM, Delman AM, Kharofa JR, Smith MT, Choe KA, Olowokure O, Wilson GC, Patel SH, Sohal D, Ahmad SA. Radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A review. Surgery 2022; 172:284-290. [PMID: 35034793 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer constitutes a complex clinical entity, presenting the clinician with a locally aggressive disease that has a proclivity for distant spread. The benefits of radiation therapy, such as improved local control and improved survival, have been questioned. In this review we seek to summarize the existing evidence on radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and highlight future areas of research. METHODS A comprehensive review of PubMed for clinical studies reporting outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer was performed in June 2021, with an emphasis placed on prospective studies. RESULTS Radiologic "downstaging" in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a rare event, although some evidence shows increased clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over radiation therapy. Margin status seems to be equivalent between regimens that use neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and regimens that include neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Local control in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is likely improved with radiation therapy; however, the benefit of improved local control in a disease marked by systemic failure has been questioned. Although some studies have shown improved survival with radiation therapy, differences in the delivery and tolerance of chemotherapy between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting confound these results. When the evidence is evaluated as a whole, there is no clear survival benefit of radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Once considered a staple of therapy, the role of radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is evolving as systemic therapy regimens continues to improve. Increased clinical understanding of disease phenotype and response are needed to accurately tailor therapy for individual patients and to improve outcomes in this complex patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Aaron M Delman
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Jordan R Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Milton T Smith
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Kyuran A Choe
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Olugbenga Olowokure
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Davendra Sohal
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Labori KJ. Short-Course or Total Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer - Current Status and Future Perspectives. Front Surg 2022; 9:839339. [PMID: 35548190 PMCID: PMC9082635 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.839339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy improves overall survival compared with a surgery-first approach in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Evidence of higher quality is required to determine whether neoadjuvant therapy has potential benefits and improves survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored short-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SNT), but total neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TNT) is now the experimental arm of ongoing RCTs. This article reviews the current status of SNT and TNT in RPC and BRPC, and provides perspectives of future challenges and research directions in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Davis CH, Beane JD, Gazivoda VP, Grandhi MS, Greenbaum AA, Kennedy TJ, Langan RC, August DA, Alexander HR, Pitt HA. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Increased Use and Improved Optimal Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:436-443. [PMID: 35290262 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of more effective chemotherapy a decade ago has led to increased use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to assess the evolving use of NAT in individuals with PDAC undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and to compare their outcomes with patients undergoing upfront operation. STUDY DESIGN The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Procedure Targeted Pancreatectomy database was queried from 2014 to 2019. Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were evaluated based on the use of NAT versus upfront operation. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the effect of NAT on postoperative outcomes, including the composite measure optimal pancreatic surgery (OPS). Mann-Kendall trend tests were performed to assess the use of NAT and associated outcomes over time. RESULTS A total of 13,257 patients were identified who underwent PD for PDAC between 2014 and 2019. Overall, 33.6% of patients received NAT. The use of NAT increased steadily from 24.2% in 2014 to 42.7% in 2019 (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, NAT was associated with reduced serious morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 0.83, p < 0.001), clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (OR 0.52, p < 0.001), organ space infections (OR 0.74, p < 0.001), percutaneous drainage (OR 0.73, p < 0.001), reoperation (OR 0.76, p = 0.005), and prolonged length of stay (OR 0.63, p < 0.001). OPS was achieved more frequently in patients undergoing NAT (OR 1.433, p < 0.001) and improved over time in patients receiving NAT (50.7% to 56.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION NAT before pancreatoduodenectomy increased more than 3-fold over the past decade and was associated with improved optimal operative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Davis
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - Joal D Beane
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (Beane)
| | - Victor P Gazivoda
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - Miral S Grandhi
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - Alissa A Greenbaum
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - Timothy J Kennedy
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - Russell C Langan
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- the Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Livingston, NJ (Langan)
| | - David A August
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - H Richard Alexander
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| | - Henry A Pitt
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (Davis, Gazivoda, Grandhi, Greenbaum, Kennedy, Langan, August, Alexander, Pitt)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gemenetzis G, McKay S, Pathak S, Moir J, Laing R, Jamieson NB, Young AL, Chatzizacharias NA, Giovinazzo F, Roberts KJ. Surgical Management of Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in the United Kingdom: Results of a Nationwide Survey on Current Practice. Front Oncol 2021; 11:791946. [PMID: 35004314 PMCID: PMC8733562 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.791946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIt is presently unclear what clinical pathways are followed for patients with non-metastatic PDAC in specialised centres for pancreatic surgery across the United Kingdom (UK).MethodsBetween August 2019 and August 2020 an electronic survey was conducted aiming at a national cohort of pancreatic surgeons in the UK. Participants replied to a list of standardised questions and clinical vignettes, and data were collected and analysed focusing on management preferences, resectability criteria, and contraindications to surgery.ResultsWithin the study period, 65 pancreatic surgeons from 27 specialist centres in the UK (96%) completed the survey. Multidisciplinary team meetings are utilised universally for the management of patients with PDAC, however, different staging systems for resectability classification are being applied. In borderline resectable PDAC, most surgeons were keen to proceed with surgical exploration post NAT, but differences were noted in preferred chemotherapy regimens. Surgeons from standard volume institutions performed fewer vein resections annually and were more likely to deem patients with locally advanced PDAC as unresectable. Intra-institutional variability in patient management was also present and ranging between 20-80%.ConclusionsSignificant variability in the surgical management of non-metastatic PDAC was identified both on inter- and intra-institutional level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Hepatobiliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Keith J. Roberts, ; Georgios Gemenetzis,
| | - Siobhan McKay
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Samir Pathak
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - John Moir
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Laing
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel B. Jamieson
- West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair L. Young
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Keith J. Roberts, ; Georgios Gemenetzis,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ward EP, Zeh Iii HJ, Tsai S. Current Controversies in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:657-671. [PMID: 34511188 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Over the last two decades, there have been significant changes in the management of patients with localized pancreatic cancer. The rationale for an evolution toward a neoadjuvant approach and summary of relevant clinical trials is reviewed. Controversies in identifying optimal neoadjuvant therapeutic approaches are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin P Ward
- Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh Iii
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern (University of Texas), 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Susan Tsai
- Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tomasello G, Ghidini M, Ghidini A, Trevisan F, Celotti A, Russo A, Gambini D, Indini A, Rijavec E, Bareggi C, Galassi B, Petrelli F. Total neoadjuvant therapy for initially inoperable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review of phase 2-3 studies. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:13-19. [PMID: 34509562 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with initially inoperable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) have a poor prognosis, often similar to those with metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) plus concomitant or sequential radiotherapy (RT) may cause tumor shrinkage and allow for radical surgery. We pooled data of studies in which patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or borderline resectable PC were treated with a course of induction (or consolidation) CT followed or preceded by neoadjuvant CTRT regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched articles, including phase 2 or 3 studies, published in English from 2010 up to December 2020 in PubMed, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The primary outcomes were the pooled radical and R0 resection rates, median PFS and OS of included patients (those included in the intent to treat analysis). RESULTS A total of 28 studies were finally considered eligible for inclusion in quantitative analysis for a total of 2446 patients with locally advanced/borderline resectable PC. Overall the pooled rate of resection was 29.7% (95%CI 26.7-32.8%). In patients who completed the CT + CTRT program, the overall resection rate was 31.8% (95% 28.4-35.4%). After exclusion of studies that included resectable PCs, the overall resection rate was 19.9% (95%CI 17.3-22.7%). In studies were all patients had unresectable PC (n = 20 studies), the resection rate was 12.1% (95%CI 10-14.5%). In two studies that enrolled all borderline resectable PCs the resection rate was 59.2% (95%CI 48.9-68.8%). The pooled R0 resection rate was 68.7% (95%CI 64.7-72.3%). The median pooled OS was 15.7 months (95%CI 14-17.2 months) and the median pooled PFS was 10.7 (95%CI 9.3-12.1 months). CONCLUSIONS Surgery is a treatment option in about one third of patients with initially inoperable PC, following total neoadjuvant therapy. In unresectable cases the resection rate was 12%. Median OS and PFS rates were comparable with historical data of advanced PCs. Optimal integration and sequence of chemo- and radiotherapy in unresectable PC must still be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Tomasello
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy; GISCAD (Gruppo Italiano Studio Carcinomi Apparato Digerente)
| | | | - Andrea Celotti
- General Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Ospedale di Treviglio, Italy
| | - Alessandro Russo
- General Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Ospedale di Treviglio, Italy
| | - Donatella Gambini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Erika Rijavec
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Bareggi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Galassi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Ospedale di Treviglio, Italy; GISCAD (Gruppo Italiano Studio Carcinomi Apparato Digerente)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brown ZJ, Cloyd JM. Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent progress and future directions. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2021; 10:376-378. [PMID: 34159167 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J Brown
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Datta J, Merchant NB. Multimodality Therapy in Operable Pancreatic Cancer: Should We Sequence Surgery Last? Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:1884-1886. [PMID: 33454881 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09400-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jashodeep Datta
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nipun B Merchant
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Søreide K. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Operable Pancreatic Cancer: Both Honey and Milk (but No Bread?). Oncol Ther 2021; 9:1-12. [PMID: 33439449 PMCID: PMC8140001 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-020-00136-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis. Resection is the best option for cure, supported by multimodal therapy to treat the systemic disease. While adjuvant therapy has become standard in those who are fit and who can tolerate the given regimen, the concept of perioperative (neoadjuvant) therapy is building momentum. The concepts of “borderline” and “locally advanced” have changed the previous dichotomized “resectable/non-resectable” into subcategories for which new algorithms have emerged, with neoadjuvant therapy discussed both for upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, for those deemed borderline resectable, and as “induction or conversion” therapy for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this invited commentary is to discuss some of the changing paradigms in multimodal therapy for operable pancreatic cancer. The PREOPANC trial presented randomized data on the role of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline cancers, but new questions have emerged. The role of combination therapy in the preoperative setting is discussed in the light of this trial. FOLFIRINOX has emerged as the most potent treatment regimen in the metastatic and adjuvant setting, but with no level I data to support neoadjuvant use yet. Several trials are ongoing to arrive at the best answer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjetil Søreide
- -Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- Gastrointestinal Translation Research Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|