1
|
Thomas AS, Belli A, Salceda J, López-Ben S, Lee SY, Kwon W, Pawlik TM, Kluger MD. Contemporary practice and perception of autologous blood salvage in hepato-pancreatico-biliary operations: an international survey. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00122-3. [PMID: 37117066 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess contemporary knowledge, attitudes and behaviors around transfusion of intraoperative salvaged blood (sRBCt) during hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) operations. Findings are meant to inform the design of future studies that address provider concerns to change behaviors and improve patient outcomes. METHODS A survey was designed and assessed for relevance, readability and content, and distributed to an international audience of surgeons performing HPB operations. RESULTS The 237 respondents were predominantly distributed across North America (37.55%), Europe (27.43%) and Asia (19.83%). Roughly one-half (52.74%) of respondents had used sRBCt in HPB surgery before. Transplantation surgeons were more likely than HPB surgeons to have previously used sRBCt [odds ratio = 5.18 (95% CI 1.89-14.20)]. More respondents believed sRBCt was safe for non-cancer versus cancer operations (68.57% vs. 24.17%, p < 0.0001). Less than half (45.71%) of respondents believed that sRBCt was safe in clean-contaminated fields. Most did not utilize preoperative strategies to avoid donor transfusion. CONCLUSION Practices related to sRBCt in HPB operations vary widely and there is no consensus on its use. Concerns seem primarily related to cancer-specific and infectious outcomes. While further studies are pursued, surgeons may increase their utilization of preoperative strategies to boost hemoglobin levels for at risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Thomas
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Herbert Irving Pavilion, 8th Floor, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Andrea Belli
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - Juan Salceda
- Department of Surgery, Ramon Santamarina Hospital, Gral. Paz 1406, B7000, Tandil, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Santiago López-Ben
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Avinguda de França, S/N, 17007, 168753, Girona, Spain
| | - Ser Y Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 31 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehak-ro Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, 395 W 12th Ave #670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Michael D Kluger
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Herbert Irving Pavilion, 8th Floor, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zuckerman J, Coburn N, Callum J, Mahar AL, Lin Y, Turgeon AF, McLeod R, Pearsall E, Martel G, Hallet J. Evaluating variation in perioperative red blood cell transfusion for patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Surgery 2023; 173:392-400. [PMID: 36336508 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery often receive packed red blood cell transfusions. Understanding practice variation is critical to support efforts working toward responsible transfusion use. We measured the extent and importance of variation in perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion use across physicians and hospitals among gastrointestinal cancer surgery patients. METHODS We identified patients who underwent elective gastrointestinal cancer resection between 2007 and 2019 using linked administrative health data sets in Ontario, Canada. We used funnel plots to describe variation in transfusion use, adjusted for patient case mix. Hierarchical regression models quantified patient-level, between-physician, and between-hospital variation in transfusion use with R2 measures, variance partition coefficients, and median odds ratios. RESULTS Of 59,964 included patients (median age 69 years; 43.2% female; 75.8% colorectal resections), 18.0% received perioperative packed red blood cell transfusions. Funnel plots showed variation in transfusion use among physicians and hospitals. Patient characteristics, such as age, comorbidity, and procedure type, combined to explain 12.8% of the variation. After adjusting for case mix, systematic between-physician and between-hospital differences were responsible for 2.8% and 2.1% of the variation, respectively. This translated to an approximately 30% difference in the odds of transfusion for 2 similar patients treated by distinct physicians (median odds ratio: 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.30-1.40) and hospitals (median odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.42). We observed comparable effects across procedure-type subgroups. CONCLUSION Transfusion provision is highly driven by patient factors. Yet the impact of the treating physician and hospital on variation relative to other factors is important and reflects opportunities to target modifiable processes of care to standardize perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Zuckerman
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeannie Callum
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyson L Mahar
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Yulia Lin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Université Laval, Québec City, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada
| | - Robin McLeod
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Julie Hallet
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Booth AT, Allen S, Simianu VV, Jensen CC, Schermerhorn ML, George VV, Curran T. Selective type & screen for elective colectomy based on a transfusion risk score may generate substantial cost savings. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8817-8824. [PMID: 35616730 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09307-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative type and screen are currently recommended for all patients undergoing colectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors for transfusion and define a low-risk cohort of patients undergoing colectomy in whom type and screen may be safely avoided. METHODS We identified all patients undergoing elective colectomy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Targeted Colectomy files from 2012 to 2016. Patients transfused preoperatively and those undergoing other concurrent major abdominal procedures were excluded. We compared patients who received blood transfusion on the day of surgery to those who did not. Half of the cohort was randomly selected for development of a points-based model predicting blood transfusion on the day of surgery. This model was then validated using the remaining patients. RESULTS Of 61,964 patients undergoing colectomy, 3128 (5%) patients were transfused with 1290 (2.1%) occurring on the day of surgery. Preoperative anemia was the strongest predictor of blood transfusion on the day of surgery. Among patients with hematocrit > 35%, day of surgery transfusion risk was 0.8%; 99% of patients with hematocrit > 35% had a score 20 or less. Selective type and screen for patients with score ≤ 20 or hematocrit > 35% would avoid type and screen in 91% and 81% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Transfusion following elective colectomy is rare and can be accurately predicted by preoperative patient characteristics. Selective type and screen based on these parameters have the potential to prevent operative delays and lower cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander T Booth
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, Suite 249, MSC 295, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Shelby Allen
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, Suite 249, MSC 295, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Vlad V Simianu
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Virgilio V George
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, Suite 249, MSC 295, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Thomas Curran
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, Suite 249, MSC 295, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rieser CJ, Alvikas J, Phelos H, Hall LB, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Failure to Thrive Following Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Causes and Consequences. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2630-2639. [PMID: 34988834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11100-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to thrive (FTT) is a complex syndrome of nutritional failure and functional decline. Readmission for FTT following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC) is common but underexamined. This study aims to determine features, risk factors, and prognostic significance of FTT following CRS HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent CRS HIPEC from 2010 to 2018 at our institution. Patients were categorized into no readmission, FTT readmission, and other readmission. FTT was determined by coding and chart review. We compared baseline characteristics, oncologic data, perioperative outcomes, and survival among the three cohorts. RESULTS Of 1068 discharges examined, 379 patients (36%) were readmitted within 90 days, of which 134 (12.5%) were labeled as FTT. Patients with FTT readmission had worse preoperative functional status, higher rates of malnutrition, more complex resections, longer hospital stays, and more postoperative complications (all p < 0.001). Ostomy creation [relative risk ratio (RRR) 4.06], in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE), discharge to nursing home (RRR 2.48), pre-CRS HIPEC chemotherapy (RRR 1.98), older age (RRR 1.84), and female gender (RRR 1.69) were all independent predictors for FTT readmission on multinomial regression (all p < 0.01). FTT readmission was associated with worse median overall survival on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.60, p < 0.001] after controlling for oncologic, perioperative, and baseline factors. CONCLUSIONS FTT is common following CRS HIPEC and appears to be associated with baseline patient characteristics, operative burden, and postoperative complications. Perioperative strategies for improving nutrition and activity, along with early recognition and intervention in FTT may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Jurgis Alvikas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather Phelos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Benefits of Robotic Surgery: Are They Technical or Molecular? J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:578-580. [PMID: 33409821 PMCID: PMC7904706 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04901-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
6
|
Warner SG. Transforming Perioperative Transfusion Rates in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Snapshot of Data-Driven Practice Change. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:4-6. [PMID: 33151507 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09296-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne G Warner
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|