1
|
Rauwerdink P, van de Vlasakker VCJ, Wassenaar ECE, Rovers KP, Los M, Herbschleb KH, Creemers GJM, Thijs AMJ, Raicu MG, Huysentruyt CJR, van der Hoeven EJRJ, Nederend J, Peeters RYM, Deenen MJ, Elias SG, Fijneman RJA, Constantinides A, Kranenburg O, Burger PWA, Nienhuijs SW, Wiezer RJ, Lurvink RJ, de Hingh IHJT, Boerma D. First-line palliative systemic therapy alternated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: A single-arm phase II trial (CRC-PIPAC-II). EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108487. [PMID: 38905732 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative systemic therapy alternated with electrostatic precipitation oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) has never been prospectively investigated in patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The CRC-PIPAC-II study aimed to assess safety, feasibility and efficacy of such bidirectional therapy. METHODS This two-center, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients to undergo three treatment cycles, consisting of systemic therapy (CAPOX, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or FOLFOXIRI, all with bevacizumab) and oxaliplatin-based ePIPAC (92 mg/m2) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2). Primary outcome were major treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included minor events, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Twenty patients completed 52 treatment cycles. Fifteen major events occurred in 7 patients (35 %): 5 events (33 %) related to systemic therapy; 5 (33 %) related to ePIPAC; and 5 (33 %) were biochemical events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. All patients experienced minor events, mostly abdominal pain, nausea and peripheral sensory neuropathy. After treatment, radiological, pathological, cytological, and biochemical response was observed in 0 %, 88 %, 38 %, and 31 % of patients respectively. Curative surgery was achieved in one patient. Median PFS was 10.0 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 8.0-13.0) and median OS was 17.5 months (95 % CI 13.0-not reached). CONCLUSIONS Combining palliative systemic therapy with oxaliplatin-based ePIPAC in patients with unresectable CPM was feasible and showed an acceptable safety profile. Treatment-induced response and survival are promising, yet further research is required to determine the additional value of ePIPAC to systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Karin H Herbschleb
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mihaela G Raicu
- Department of Pathology DNA, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Rifka Y M Peeters
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Deenen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alexander Constantinides
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Lab Translational Oncology, Division Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Pim W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - René J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Detlefsen S, Burton M, Ainsworth AP, Fristrup C, Graversen M, Pfeiffer P, Tarpgaard LS, Mortensen MB. RNA expression profiling of peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2024; 9:79-91. [PMID: 38948326 PMCID: PMC11211652 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2024-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an experimental treatment option in peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer (PM-PC). Aims were to examine mRNA profile of fibrosis due to response after systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC (Regression) compared to treatment-naïve PM-PC and chronic cholecystitis-related peritoneal fibrosis (Controls). Methods Peritoneal biopsies (PBs) from PM-PC patients who had undergone systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC were evaluated with Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). We extracted RNA from PBs with Regression (PRGS 1, n=11), treatment-naïve PM-PC (n=10), and Controls (n=10). Profiling of 800 mRNAs was performed (NanoString nCounter, PanCancer Immuno-Oncology 360 (IO-360) and 30 additional stroma-related mRNAs). Results Regression vs. PM-PC identified six up-regulated and 197 down-regulated mRNAs (FDR≤0.05), linked to TNF-α signaling via NF-kB, G2M checkpoint, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, estrogen response, and coagulation. Regression vs. Controls identified 43 significantly up-regulated mRNAs, linked to interferon-α response, and down-regulation of 99 mRNAs, linked to TNF-α signaling via NF-kB, inflammatory response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, KRAS signaling, and hypoxia (FDR≤0.05). Conclusions In regressive fibrosis of PM-PC after systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC (Regression), downregulation of mRNAs related to key tumor biological pathways was identified. Regression also showed transcriptional differences from unspecific, benign fibrosis (Controls). Future studies should explore whether mRNA profiling of PBs with PM from PC or other primaries holds prognostic or predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sönke Detlefsen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mark Burton
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Genome Center, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alan P. Ainsworth
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI and HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus Fristrup
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI and HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI and HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN–Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark,Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Line S. Tarpgaard
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael B. Mortensen
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) and Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI and HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Ven RGFM, van den Heuvel TBM, Rovers KPB, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, van Grevenstein WMU, Hemmer PHJ, Kok NFM, Madsen EVE, de Reuver P, Tuynman JB, van Erning FN, de Hingh IHJT. Towards Equal Access to Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Isolated Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3758-3768. [PMID: 38453767 PMCID: PMC11076384 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15131-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before 2016, patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases (PMCRC) diagnosed in expert centers had a higher odds of undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) and better overall survival (OS) than those diagnosed in referring centers. Nationwide efforts were initiated to increase awareness and improve referral networks. METHODS This nationwide study aimed to evaluate whether the between-center differences in odds of undergoing CRS-HIPEC and OS have reduced since these national efforts were initiated. All patients with isolated synchronous PMCRC diagnosed between 2009 and 2021 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Associations between hospital of diagnosis and the odds of undergoing CRS-HIPEC, as well as OS, were assessed using multilevel multivariable regression analyses for two periods (2009-2015 and 2016-2021). RESULTS In total, 3948 patients were included. The percentage of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC increased from 17.2% in 2009-2015 (25.4% in expert centers, 16.5% in referring centers), to 23.4% in 2016-2021 (30.2% in expert centers, 22.6% in referring centers). In 2009-2015, compared with diagnosis in a referring center, diagnosis in a HIPEC center showed a higher odds of undergoing CRS-HIPEC (odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.67) and better survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96). In 2016-2021, there were no differences in the odds of undergoing CRS-HIPEC between patients diagnosed in HIPEC centers versus referring centers (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.76-2.13) and survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.32). CONCLUSION Previously observed differences in odds of undergoing CRS-HIPEC were no longer present. Increased awareness and the harmonization of treatment for PMCRC may have contributed to equal access to care and a similar chance of survival at a national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roos G F M van der Ven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Teun B M van den Heuvel
- Department of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P B Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bootsma S, Dings MPG, Kesselaar J, Helderman RFCPA, van Megesen K, Constantinides A, Moreno LF, Stelloo E, Scutigliani EM, Bokan B, Torang A, van Hooff SR, Zwijnenburg DA, Wouters VM, van de Vlasakker VCJ, Galanos LJK, Nijman LE, Logiantara A, Veenstra VL, Schlingemann S, van Piggelen S, van der Wel N, Krawczyk PM, Platteeuw JJ, Tuynman JB, de Hingh IH, Klomp JPG, Oubrie A, Snaebjornsson P, Medema JP, Oei AL, Kranenburg O, Elbers CC, Lenos KJ, Vermeulen L, Bijlsma MF. Exploiting a subtype-specific mitochondrial vulnerability for successful treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101523. [PMID: 38670098 PMCID: PMC11148637 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) respond poorly to treatment and are associated with unfavorable prognosis. For example, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery in resectable patients shows limited benefit, and novel treatments are urgently needed. The majority of CRC-PMs represent the CMS4 molecular subtype of CRC, and here we queried the vulnerabilities of this subtype in pharmacogenomic databases to identify novel therapies. This reveals the copper ionophore elesclomol (ES) as highly effective against CRC-PMs. ES exhibits rapid cytotoxicity against CMS4 cells by targeting mitochondria. We find that a markedly reduced mitochondrial content in CMS4 cells explains their vulnerability to ES. ES demonstrates efficacy in preclinical models of PMs, including CRC-PMs and ovarian cancer organoids, mouse models, and a HIPEC rat model of PMs. The above proposes ES as a promising candidate for the local treatment of CRC-PMs, with broader implications for other PM-prone cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Bootsma
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark P G Dings
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Job Kesselaar
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roxan F C P A Helderman
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kyah van Megesen
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Leandro Ferreira Moreno
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Stelloo
- Department of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Enzo M Scutigliani
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bella Bokan
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arezo Torang
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander R van Hooff
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danny A Zwijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Valérie M Wouters
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lisanne E Nijman
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adrian Logiantara
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Veronique L Veenstra
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sophie Schlingemann
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sterre van Piggelen
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole van der Wel
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Electron Microscopy Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Przemek M Krawczyk
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul Medema
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arlene L Oei
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Clara C Elbers
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kristiaan J Lenos
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van de Vlasakker VCJ, Guchelaar NAD, van den Heuvel TBM, Lurvink RJ, van Meerten E, Bax RJF, Creemers GJM, van Hellemond IEG, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Madsen EVE, Nederend J, Koolen SLW, Nienhuijs SW, Kranenburg O, de Hingh IHJT, Verhoef C, Mathijssen RHJ, Burger JWA. Intraperitoneal irinotecan with concomitant FOLFOX and bevacizumab for patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of the multicentre, open-label, phase II, INTERACT-II trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077667. [PMID: 38238055 PMCID: PMC10806681 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The peritoneum is the second most affected organ for the dissemination of colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) face a poor prognosis, despite the majority of patients being treated with palliative systemic therapy. The efficacy of palliative systemic therapy is limited due to the plasma-peritoneum barrier. The poor prognosis of unresectable CPM patients has resulted in the development of new treatment strategies where systemic therapy is combined with local, intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In the recently published phase I study, the maximum tolerated dose and thus the recommended phase II dose of intraperitoneal irinotecan was investigated and determined to be 75 mg. In the present study, the overall survival after treatment with 75 mg irinotecan with concomitant mFOLFOX4 and bevacizumab will be investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-arm phase II study in two Dutch tertiary referral centres, 85 patients are enrolled. Eligibility criteria are an adequate performance status and organ function, histologically confirmed microsatellite stable and unresectable CPM, no previous palliative therapy for CRC, no systemic therapy<6 months for CRC prior to enrolment and no previous cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC). Patients will undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy as standard work-up for CPM and if the peritoneal disease is considered unresectable (eg, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI)>20, too extensive small bowel involvement), a peritoneal access port and a port-a-cath are placed for administration of intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy, respectively. Patients may undergo up to 12 cycles of study treatment. Each cycle consists of intravenous mFOLFOX4 with bevacizumab and concomitant intraperitoneal irinotecan (75 mg), which is repeated every 2 weeks, with a maximum of 12 cycles. Modified FOLFOX-4 regimen consists of 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin plus 200 mg/m2 LV and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1 followed by 1600 mg/m2 5-FU as a 46 hours infusion. Study treatment ends after the 12th cycle, or earlier in case of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome is overall survival and key secondary outcomes are progression-free survival, safety (measured by the amount of grade ≥3 adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0)), patient-reported outcomes and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan. It is hypothesised that the trial treatment will lead to a 4 month increase in overall survival; from a median of 12.2 to 16.2 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is approved by the Dutch Authority (CCMO, the Hague, the Netherlands), by a central medical ethics committee (MEC-U, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands) and by the institutional research boards of both research centres. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented to patients and healthcare professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06003998.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ramon J F Bax
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun BJ, Lee B. Results of the First Phase I PIPAC Trial in the United States: Braving the Storm. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7923-7925. [PMID: 37770724 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14353-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice J Sun
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kryh-Jensen CG, Fristrup CW, Ainsworth AP, Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB, Pfeiffer P, Tarpgaard LS, Graversen M. What is long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancer? A study of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:147-155. [PMID: 38144215 PMCID: PMC10739291 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives A definition of long-term survival (LTS) in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC), pancreatic cancer (PC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with systemic chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is lacking. We aimed to define LTS and investigate characteristics and treatment response in patients who reached LTS in data from two prospective trials. Methods Retrospective study of patients with GC-, PC-, or CRC-PM from the prospective PIPAC-OPC1 and PIPAC-OPC2 studies. The definition of LTS was based on published systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. LTS was defined at the time point where 25 % of the patients were alive in these studies. Histology based response was evaluated by the mean Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) using biopsies obtained prior to PIPAC 3, and defined by a mean PRGS of ≤2.0 or a decrease of mean PRGS of ≥1, compared to baseline. Results LTS was defined at 21 (GC), 15 (PC), and 24 (CRC) months. Fifty-one (47.2 %) patients (nine GC, 17 PC, 25 CRC) reached LTS calculated from the date of PM diagnosis. All but one received palliative chemotherapy before PIPAC, and 37 % received bidirectional treatment. More than 90 % of the LTS patients had response according to PRGS. The mOS from PIPAC 1 was 23.3, 12.4, and 28.5 months for GC, PC, and CRC LTS patients. Conclusions Patients with PM from GC, PC, and CRC treated with systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC can reach LTS and most show histological response. Causality must be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte G. Kryh-Jensen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus W. Fristrup
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alan P. Ainsworth
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael B. Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Line S. Tarpgaard
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN – Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van de Vlasakker VCJ, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Rauwerdink P, Bakkers C, Rovers KP, Bonhof CS, Burger JWA, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, Mols F, de Hingh IHJT. Comparing patient reported abdominal pain between patients treated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) and primary colorectal cancer surgery. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20458. [PMID: 37993560 PMCID: PMC10665337 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) is an emerging palliative treatment for patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases. Previously, our study group reported that patients experienced abdominal pain for several weeks after PIPAC-OX. However, it is unknown how this compares to abdominal pain after regular colorectal cancer surgery. To provide some perspective, this study compared the presence of abdominal pain after PIPAC-OX to the presence of abdominal pain after primary tumor surgery. Patient reported abdominal pain scores (EORTC QLQ-CR-29), from two prospective, Dutch cohorts were used in this study. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, a higher score represents more abdominal pain. Abdominal pain at baseline and at four weeks after treatment were compared between the two groups. Twenty patients who underwent PIPAC-OX and 322 patients who underwent primary tumor surgery were included in the analysis. At baseline, there were no differences in abdominal pain between both groups (mean 20 vs. 18, respectively; p = 0.688). Four weeks after treatment, abdominal pain was significantly worse in the PIPAC group (39 vs 15, respectively; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.99). The differential effect over time for abdominal pain differed significantly between both groups (mean difference: 19 vs - 3, respectively; p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.88). PIPAC-OX resulted in significantly worse postoperative abdominal pain than primary tumor surgery. These results can be used for patient counseling and stress the need for adequate analgesia during and after PIPAC-OX. Further research is required to prevent or reduce abdominal pain after PIPAC-OX.Trial registration CRC-PIPAC: Clinicaltrails.gov NCT03246321 (01-10-2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent C J van de Vlasakker
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emma C Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien Rauwerdink
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia S Bonhof
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Centre of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Centre of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Daniel SK, Sun BJ, Lee B. PIPAC for Gastrointestinal Malignancies. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6799. [PMID: 37959264 PMCID: PMC10650315 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The peritoneum is a common site of metastases for gastrointestinal tumors that predicts a poor outcome. In addition to decreased survival, peritoneal metastases (PMs) can significantly impact quality of life from the resulting ascites and bowel obstructions. The peritoneum has been a target for regional therapies due to the unique properties of the blood-peritoneum barrier. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have become accepted treatments for limited-volume peritoneal disease in appendiceal, ovarian, and colorectal malignancies, but there are limitations. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) improves drug distribution and tissue penetration, allowing for a minimally invasive application for patients who are not CRS/HIPEC candidates based on high disease burden. PIPAC is an emerging treatment that may convert the patient to resectable disease, and may increase survival without major morbidity, as indicated by many small studies. In this review, we discuss the rationale and benefits of PIPAC, as well as sentinel papers describing its application for gastric, colorectal, appendiceal, and pancreatobiliary PMs. While no PIPAC device has yet met FDA approval, we discuss next steps needed to incorporate PIPAC into neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment paradigms, as well as palliative settings. Data on active clinical trials using PIPAC are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara K. Daniel
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heuvelings DJI, Wintjens AGWE, Jongen ACHM, Gielen MJCAM, Lenaerts K, Fransen PPKH, Gijbels MJ, van Almen GC, Dankers PYW, de Hingh IHJT, Bouvy ND. Evaluation of the Effect of an Intraperitoneal Cytostatic-Loaded Supramolecular Hydrogel on Intestinal Anastomotic Healing in an Animal Model. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2076. [PMID: 37895458 PMCID: PMC10608244 DOI: 10.3390/life13102076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases is very poor. Intraperitoneal drug delivery systems, like supramolecular hydrogels, are being developed to improve local delivery and intraperitoneal residence time of a cytostatic such as mitomycin C (MMC). In this study, we evaluate the effect of intraperitoneal hydrogel administration on anastomotic healing. Forty-two healthy Wistar rats received a colonic end-to-end anastomosis, after which 6 animals received an intraperitoneal injection with saline, 18 with unloaded hydrogel and 18 with MMC-loaded hydrogel. After 7 days, animals were euthanized, and the anastomotic adhesion and leakage score were measured as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were bursting pressure, histological anastomosis evaluation and body weight changes. Twenty-two rats completed the follow-up period (saline: n = 6, unloaded hydrogel: n = 10, MMC-loaded hydrogel: n = 6) and were included in the analysis. A trend towards significance was found for anastomotic leakage score between the rats receiving saline and unloaded hydrogel after multiple-comparison correction (p = 0.020, α = 0.0167). No significant differences were found for all other outcomes. The main reason for drop-out in this study was intestinal blood loss. Although the preliminary results suggest that MMC-loaded or unloaded hydrogel does not influence anastomotic healing, the intestinal blood loss observed in a considerable number of animals receiving unloaded and MMC-loaded hydrogel implies that the injection of the hydrogel under the studied conditions is not safe in the current rodent model and warrants further optimalisation of the hydrogel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique J. I. Heuvelings
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne G. W. E. Wintjens
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maurits J. C. A. M. Gielen
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kaatje Lenaerts
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marion J. Gijbels
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Experimental Vascular Biology, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Patricia Y. W. Dankers
- Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Chemical Engineering & Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of General Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole D. Bouvy
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ezanno AC, Malgras B, Pocard M. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:45-53. [PMID: 37304159 PMCID: PMC10249753 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including "PIPAC" and "pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy." Content Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC. Summary The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients' wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…). Outlook Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Cecile Ezanno
- Department of digestive surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Brice Malgras
- Department of digestive surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
- French Military health Service Academy, Ecole du Val de Grâce, Paris, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of digestive surgery, La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
- INSERM, U965 Cart unit, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Strating E, van de Loo A, Elias S, Lam M, Kranenburg O. Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor-PET Imaging in Colorectal Cancer. PET Clin 2023:S1556-8598(23)00016-0. [PMID: 37030984 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-PET imaging holds great promise for improving the clinical management of colorectal cancer. High fibroblast activation protein expression is particularly observed in lymph node metastases, in the aggressive Consensus Molecular Subtype 4, in peritoneal metastases, and in tumors that respond poorly to immunotherapy. We have defined six clinical dilemmas in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer, which FAPI-PET may help solve. Future clinical trials should include patients undergoing tumor resection, allowing correlation of FAPI-PET signals with in-depth histopathological, cellular, and molecular tissue analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Strating
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, Laboratory Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, G.04.2.28, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne van de Loo
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, Laboratory Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, G.04.2.28, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, STR.6.131, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, E.01.1.32, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Division of Imaging and Cancer, Laboratory Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, G.04.2.28, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1331-1341. [PMID: 36513815 PMCID: PMC9984350 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely monitored. METHODS We performed a prospective registry study for patients with PSMs. Cisplatin (C) (7.5 mg/m2 body surface) and doxorubicin (D) (1.5 mg/m2) were administered laparoscopically via PIPAC. RESULTS Between November 2015 and June 2020, we recorded data from 108 patients and 230 scheduled procedures. Tumor burden, patient fitness, quality of life, operating time and in-hospital stay remained stable over consecutive procedures. We recorded 21 non-access situations and 14 intraoperative complications (11 intestinal injuries, and three aspirations while inducing anesthesia). Three or more previous abdominal surgeries or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) were risk factors for non-access and intestinal injuries (χ2, p ≤ 0.01). Five Grade IV and three Grade V postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) occurred. Median overall survival was 264 days (interquartile range 108-586). Therapies were primarily discontinued because of death (34%), progressive (26%), or regressive (16%) disease. CONCLUSION PIPAC is effective in stabilizing PSMs and retaining quality of life in selected patients. Earlier abdominal surgeries and CRS with HIPEC should be considered when determining the indication for PIPAC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate PIPAC's therapeutic benefits compared to systemic chemotherapy (sCHT) alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03100708 (April 2017).
Collapse
|
14
|
Di Giorgio A, Macrì A, Ferracci F, Robella M, Visaloco M, De Manzoni G, Sammartino P, Sommariva A, Biacchi D, Roviello F, Pastorino R, Pires Marafon D, Rotolo S, Casella F, Vaira M. 10 Years of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041125. [PMID: 36831468 PMCID: PMC9954579 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel intraperitoneal drug delivery method of low-dose chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol in patients affected by peritoneal cancer of primary or secondary origin. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of assessing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PIPAC. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using Medline and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2011, to inception, to 31 December 2021. Data were independently extracted by two authors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality and risk of bias of studies. Meta-analysis was performed for pathological response, radiological response, PCI variation along treatment, and for patients undergoing three or more PIPAC. Pooled analyses were performed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, and 95% CIs were calculated using Clopper-Pearson exact CIs in all instances. RESULTS A total of 414 papers on PIPAC were identified, and 53 studies considering 4719 PIPAC procedure in 1990 patients were included for analysis. The non-access rate or inability to perform PIPAC pooled rate was 4% of the procedures performed. The overall proportion of patients who completed 3 or more cycles of PIPAC was 39%. Severe toxicities considering CTCAE 3-4 were 4% (0% to 38.5%). In total, 50 studies evaluated deaths within the first 30 postoperative days. In the included 1936 patients were registered 26 deaths (1.3%). The pooled analysis of all the studies reporting a pathological response was 68% (95% CI 0.61-0.73), with an acceptable heterogeneity (I2 28.41%, p = 0.09). In total, 10 papers reported data regarding the radiological response, with high heterogeneity and a weighted means of 15% (0% to 77.8%). PCI variation along PIPAC cycles were reported in 14 studies. PCI diminished, increased, or remained stable in eight, one and five studies, respectively, with high heterogeneity at pooled analysis. Regarding survival, there was high heterogeneity. The 12-month estimated survival from first PIPAC for colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, gynecological cancer and hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer were, respectively, 53%, 25%, 59% and 37%. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC may be a useful treatment option for selected patients with PM, with acceptable grade 3 and 4 toxicity and promising survival benefit. Meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity of data among up-to-date available studies. In a subset analysis per primary tumor origin, pathological tumor regression was documented in 68% of the studies with acceptable heterogeneity. Pathological regression seems, therefore, a reliable outcome for PIPAC activity and a potential surrogate endpoint of treatment response. We recommend uniform selection criteria for patients entering a PIPAC program and highlight the urgent need to standardize items for PIPAC reports and datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Macrì
- U.O.C.—P.S.G. con O.B.I. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “G. Martino”—Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Federica Ferracci
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +39-0630157255
| | - Manuela Robella
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO—IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Visaloco
- U.O.C.—P.S.G. con O.B.I. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “G. Martino”—Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Sammartino
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Sommariva
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Daniele Biacchi
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Roberta Pastorino
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health—Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Denise Pires Marafon
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Rotolo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Casella
- Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Vaira
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO—IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sullivan KM, Raoof M. Evaluating End Points of the Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Techniques Including PIPAC. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2578-2581. [PMID: 36746842 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13124-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Sullivan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Roensholdt S, Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB, Graversen M. Response Evaluation in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041289. [PMID: 36835824 PMCID: PMC9963217 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) directed therapy emerged as a treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) a decade ago. The response assessment of PIPAC is not uniform. This narrative review describes non-invasive and invasive methods for response evaluation of PIPAC and summarizes their current status. PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for eligible publications, and data were reported on an intention-to-treat basis. The peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) showed a response in 18-58% of patients after two PIPACs. Five studies showed a cytological response in ascites or peritoneal lavage fluid in 6-15% of the patients. The proportion of patients with malignant cytology decreased between the first and third PIPAC. A computed tomography showed stable or regressive disease following PIPAC in 15-78% of patients. The peritoneal cancer index was mainly used as a demographic variable, but prospective studies reported a response to treatment in 57-72% of patients. The role of serum biomarkers of cancer or inflammation in the selection of candidates for and responders to PIPAC is not fully evaluated. In conclusion, response evaluation after PIPAC in patients with PM remains difficult, but PRGS seems to be the most promising response evaluation modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Roensholdt
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 15, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Development of the Peritoneal Metastasis: A Review of Back-Grounds, Mechanisms, Treatments and Prospects. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010103. [PMID: 36614904 PMCID: PMC9821147 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis is a malignant disease which originated from several gastrointestinal and gynecological carcinomas and has been leading to a suffering condition in patients for decades. Currently, as people have gradually become more aware of the severity of peritoneal carcinomatosis, new molecular mechanisms for targeting and new treatments have been proposed. However, due to the uncertainty of influencing factors involved and a lack of a standardized procedure for this treatment, as well as a need for more clinical data for specific evaluation, more research is needed, both for preventing and treating. We aim to summarize backgrounds, mechanisms and treatments in this area and conclude limitations or new aspects for treatments.
Collapse
|
18
|
Küçükköse E, Heesters BA, Villaudy J, Verheem A, Cercel M, van Hal S, Boj SF, Borel Rinkes IHM, Punt CJA, Roodhart JML, Laoukili J, Koopman M, Spits H, Kranenburg O. Modeling resistance of colorectal peritoneal metastases to immune checkpoint blockade in humanized mice. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005345. [PMID: 36543378 PMCID: PMC9772695 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The immunogenic nature of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) underlies their responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, resistance to ICB is commonly observed, and is associated with the presence of peritoneal-metastases and ascites formation. The mechanisms underlying this site-specific benefit of ICB are unknown. METHODS We created a novel model for spontaneous multiorgan metastasis in MSI-H CRC tumors by transplanting patient-derived organoids (PDO) into the cecum of humanized mice. Anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocytes-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) ICB treatment effects were analyzed in relation to the immune context of primary tumors, liver metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Immune profiling was performed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing. The role of B cells was assessed by antibody-mediated depletion. Immunosuppressive cytokine levels (interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)b1, TGFb2, TGFb3) were determined in ascites and serum samples by ELISA. RESULTS PDO-initiated primary tumors spontaneously metastasized to the liver and the peritoneum. Peritoneal-metastasis formation was accompanied by the accumulation of ascites. ICB completely cleared liver metastases and reduced primary tumor mass but had no effect on peritoneal metastases. This mimics clinical observations. After therapy discontinuation, primary tumor masses progressively decreased, but peritoneal metastases displayed unabated growth. Therapy efficacy correlated with the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS)-containing B cells and juxtaposed T cells-and with expression of an interferon-γ signature together with the B cell chemoattractant CXCL13. B cell depletion prevented liver-metastasis clearance by anti-CTLA-4 treatment. Peritoneal metastases were devoid of B cells and TLS, while the T cells in these lesions displayed a dysfunctional phenotype. Ascites samples from patients with cancer with peritoneal metastases and from the mouse model contained significantly higher levels of IL-10, TGFb1, TGFb2 and TGFb3 than serum samples. CONCLUSIONS By combining organoid and humanized mouse technologies, we present a novel model for spontaneous multiorgan metastasis by MSI-H CRC, in which the clinically observed organ site-dependent benefit of ICB is recapitulated. Moreover, we provide empirical evidence for a critical role for B cells in the generation of site-dependent antitumor immunity following anti-CTLA-4 treatment. High levels of immunosuppressive cytokines in ascites may underlie the observed resistance of peritoneal metastases to ICB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Küçükköse
- Laboratory Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Balthasar A Heesters
- Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University Faculty of Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Julien Villaudy
- J&S Preclinical Solutions, Oss, The Netherlands,AIMM Therapeutics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André Verheem
- Laboratory Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sylvia F Boj
- Hubrecht Organoid Technology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Laboratory Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Laboratory Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jamila Laoukili
- Laboratory Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hergen Spits
- AIMM Therapeutics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Laboratory Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baggaley AE, Lafaurie GBRC, Tate SJ, Boshier PR, Case A, Prosser S, Torkington J, Jones SEF, Gwynne SH, Peters CJ. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): updated systematic review using the IDEAL framework. Br J Surg 2022; 110:10-18. [PMID: 36056893 PMCID: PMC10364525 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alice E Baggaley
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Sophia J Tate
- Department of Anaesthesia, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Piers R Boshier
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Amy Case
- Department of Cancer Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Susan Prosser
- Department of Library Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Jared Torkington
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sadie E F Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sarah H Gwynne
- Department of Cancer Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Christopher J Peters
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Raoof M, Sullivan KM, Frankel PH, Fakih M, Synold TW, Lim D, Woo Y, Paz IB, Fong Y, Thomas RM, Chang S, Eng M, Tinsley R, Whelan RL, Deperalta D, Reymond MA, Jones J, Merchea A, Dellinger TH. Multicenter dose-escalation Phase I trial of mitomycin C pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases: rationale and design. Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:169-177. [PMID: 36560966 PMCID: PMC9742457 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from appendiceal cancer or colorectal cancer (CRC) has significant morbidity and limited survival. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally invasive approach to treat PM. We aim to conduct a dose-escalation trial of mitomycin C (MMC)-PIPAC combined with systemic chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) in patients with PM from appendiceal cancer or CRC. Methods This is a multicenter Phase I study of MMC-PIPAC (NCT04329494). Inclusion criteria include treatment with at least 4 months of first- or second-line systemic chemotherapy with ineligibility for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Exclusion criteria are: progression on chemotherapy; extraperitoneal metastases; systemic chemotherapy intolerance; bowel obstruction; or poor performance status (ECOG>2). Escalating MMC-PIPAC doses (7-25 mg/m2) will be administered in combination with standard dose systemic FOLFIRI. Safety evaluation will be performed on 15 patients (dose escalation) and six expansion patients: 21 evaluable patients total. Results The primary endpoints are recommended MMC dose and safety of MMC-PIPAC with FOLFIRI. Secondary endpoints are assessment of response (by peritoneal regression grade score; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1], and peritoneal carcinomatosis index), progression free survival, overall survival, technical failure rate, surgical complications, conversion to curative-intent CRS-HIPEC, patient-reported outcomes, and functional status. Longitudinal blood and tissue specimens will be collected for translational correlatives including pharmacokinetics, circulating biomarkers, immune profiling, and single-cell transcriptomics. Conclusions This Phase I trial will establish the recommended dose of MMC-PIPAC in combination with FOLFIRI. Additionally, we expect to detect an early efficacy signal for further development of this therapeutic combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kevin M. Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Paul H. Frankel
- Department of Computation and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Timothy W. Synold
- Analytical Pharmacology Core, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Dean Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Isaac Benjamin Paz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Sue Chang
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Melissa Eng
- Office of Clinical Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Raechelle Tinsley
- Office of Clinical Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Richard L. Whelan
- Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Deperalta
- Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Marc A. Reymond
- Department of Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Jeremy Jones
- Department of Oncology (Medical), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Amit Merchea
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Thanh H. Dellinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mehta S, Kammar P, Patel A, Goswami G, Shaikh S, Sukumar V, Trivedi E, Bhatt A. Feasibility and Safety of Taxane-PIPAC in Patients with Peritoneal Malignancies-a Retrospective Bi-institutional Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 2022; 14:1-9. [PMID: 36091624 PMCID: PMC9451111 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01641-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Taxanes have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for intraperitoneal application. We report our initial experience with taxane-PIPAC (pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy) for unresectable peritoneal metastases from different primary sites in terms of safety, feasibility, response rate, and conversion to resectability. In this retrospective study, PIPAC was performed alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy. Paclitaxel was used as a single agent, whereas docetaxel was used in combination with cisplatin-adriamycin or oxaliplatin-adriamycin. From December 2019 to December 2021, 47 patients underwent 82 PIPAC procedures (1 PIPAC in 55.3%, 2 in 29.7%, 3 in 14.8%). The most common primary sites were ovarian cancer (31.9%), gastric cancer (23.4%), and colorectal cancer (21.2%). Docetaxel-cisplatin-adriamycin was used in 33 (70.2%) patients, docetaxel-oxaliplatin-adriamycin in 12 (25.5%), and paclitaxel alone in 2 (4.2%) patients. Grade 1-2 complications were observed in 24 (51%) and grade 3-4 complications in 6 (12.7%) patients (8.5% of 82 PIPACs). 16/47 (34.0%) patients had a clinical response to PIPAC. The mean PCI was 25.9 ± 9.2 for the first PIPACs and 22.4 ± 9 for the subsequent PIPACs with an average reduction of 3.6 points [change in PCI ranged from - 14 to + 8]. The PRGS was 1/2 in 4/47 (8.5%) patients (19.0% patients with > 1 PIPAC). A reduction in ascites was observed in 35.4% presenting with ascites. Nine (19.1%) patients had conversion to operability leading to a subsequent cytoreductive surgery in 8 (17%) patients. PIPAC with docetaxel is feasible and safe. The role of PIPAC with both docetaxel and paclitaxel either alone or in combination with other drugs should be investigated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanket Mehta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Praveen Kammar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ankita Patel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Gaurav Goswami
- Department of Radiology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sakina Shaikh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Vivek Sukumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Esha Trivedi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kepenekian V, Bhatt A, Péron J, Alyami M, Benzerdjeb N, Bakrin N, Falandry C, Passot G, Rousset P, Glehen O. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:698-718. [PMID: 36071285 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00675-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Nonetheless, in line with advances in the management of most abdominopelvic metastatic diseases, considerable progress has been made over the past decade. An improved understanding of disease biology has led to the more accurate prediction of neoplasia aggressiveness and the treatment response and has been reflected in the proposal of new classification systems. Achieving complete cytoreductive surgery remains the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment of PSMs. Alongside centralization in expert centres, enabling the delivery of multimodal and multidisciplinary strategies, preoperative management is a crucial step in order to select patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Depending on the specific PSM, the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and of perioperative systemic chemotherapy, in particular, in the neoadjuvant setting, is established in certain scenarios but questioned in several others, although more prospective data are required. In this Review, we describe advances in all aspects of the management of PSMs including disease biology, assessment and improvement of disease resectability, perioperative management, systemic therapy and pre-emptive management, and we speculate on future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahan Kepenekian
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Julien Péron
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.,Department of Pathology, Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Department of Onco-Geriatry, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.,Department of Radiology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France. .,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wintjens AGWE, Simkens GA, Fransen PPKH, Serafras N, Lenaerts K, Franssen GHLM, de Hingh IHJT, Dankers PYW, Bouvy ND, Peeters A. Intraperitoneal drug delivery systems releasing cytostatic agents to target gastro-intestinal peritoneal metastases in laboratory animals: a systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:541-579. [PMID: 35737252 PMCID: PMC9338897 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10173-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
For peritoneal metastases (PM), there are few curative treatment options, and they are only available for a select patient group. Recently, new therapies have been developed to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy for a prolonged period, suitable for a larger patient group. These drug delivery systems (DDSs) seem promising in the experimental setting. Many types of DDSs have been explored in a variety of animal models, using different cytostatics. This review aimed to provide an overview of animal studies using DDSs containing cytostatics for the treatment of gastro-intestinal PM and identify the most promising therapeutic combinations. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) guidelines. The 35 studies included revealed similar results: using a cytostatic-loaded DDS to treat PM resulted in a higher median survival time (MST) and a lower intraperitoneal tumor load compared to no treatment or treatment with a ‘free’ cytostatic or an unloaded DDS. In 65% of the studies, the MST was significantly longer and in 24% the tumor load was significantly lower in the animals treated with cytostatic-loaded DDS. The large variety of experimental setups made it impossible to identify the most promising DDS-cytostatic combination. In most studies, the risk of bias was unclear due to poor reporting. Future studies should focus more on improving the clinical relevance of the experiments, standardizing the experimental study setup, and improving their methodological quality and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne G W E Wintjens
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Narcis Serafras
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kaatje Lenaerts
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gregor H L M Franssen
- Department of Education, Content & Support, University Library, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Y W Dankers
- Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fallah M, Detlefsen S, Ainsworth AP, Fristrup CW, Mortensen MB, Pfeiffer P, Tarpgaard LS, Graversen M. Importance of biopsy site selection for peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) in peritoneal metastasis treated with repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:143-148. [PMID: 36159216 PMCID: PMC9467898 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The four-tiered peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) is used for histological response evaluation in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Four quadrant biopsies (QBs) from the parietal peritoneum should be assessed by PRGS, but consensus on biopsy site strategy for follow-up biopsies during repeated PIPACs is lacking. We aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference between PRGS in QBs from clips marked PM (QB-CM) compared to biopsies from PM with the visually most malignant features (worst biopsy, WB). Methods Prospective, descriptive study. During the first PIPAC, index QBs sites were marked with metal clips. During the second PIPAC, an independent surgical oncologist selected biopsy site for WB and biopsies were taken from QB-CM and WB. One blinded pathologist evaluated all biopsies according to PRGS. From each biopsy, three step sections were stained H&E, followed by an immunostained section, and another three step sections stained H&E. Results Thirty-four patients were included from March 2020 to May 2021. Median age 64 years. Maximum mean PRGS in QB-CM at PIPAC 1 was 3.3 (SD 1.2). Maximum mean PRGS in QB-CM at PIPAC 2 was 2.6 (SD 1.2), whereas mean PRGS in WB at PIPAC 2 was 2.4 (SD 1.3). At PIPAC 2, there was agreement between maximum PRGS from QB-CM and PRGS from WB in 21 patients. Maximum PRGS from QB-CM was higher in nine and lower in four patients, compared to PRGS from WB. Conclusions Biopsies from QB-CM did not overestimate treatment response compared to biopsies from WB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojib Fallah
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Pathology , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
| | - Alan P. Ainsworth
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
| | - Claus W. Fristrup
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Michael B. Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Oncology , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Line S. Tarpgaard
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Oncology , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
- Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN) , Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Taibi A, Sgarbura O, Hübner M, Bardet SM, Alyami M, Bakrin N, Durand Fontanier S, Eveno C, Gagniere J, Pache B, Pocard M, Quenet F, Teixeira Farinha H, Thibaudeau E, Dumont F, Glehen O. Feasibility and Safety of Oxaliplatin-Based Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy With or Without Intraoperative Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5243-5251. [PMID: 35318519 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11577-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective multicenter cohort study compared the feasibility and safety of oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-Ox) with or without intraoperative intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (L). METHODS Our study included consecutive patients with histologically proven unresectable and isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases (cPM) treated with PIPAC-Ox in seven tertiary referral centers between January 2015 and April 2020. Toxicity events and oncological outcomes (histological response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) were compared between patients who received intraoperative intravenous 5-FU/L (PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group) and patients who did not (PIPAC-Ox group). RESULTS In total, 101 patients (263 procedures) were included in the PIPAC-Ox group and 30 patients (80 procedures) were included in the PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grade 2 or higher adverse events occurred in 48 of 101 (47.5%) patients in the PIPAC-Ox group and in 13 of 30 (43.3%) patients in the PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group (p = 0.73). The complete histological response rates according to the peritoneal regression grading score were 27% for the PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L group and 18% for the PIPAC-Ox group (p = 0.74). No statistically significant differences were observed in overall or progression-free survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The safety and feasibility of PIPAC-Ox + 5-FU/L appears to be similar to the safety and feasibility of PIPAC-Ox alone in patients with unresectable cPM. Oncological outcomes must be evaluated in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelkader Taibi
- Digestive Surgery Department, Dupuytren Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France. .,CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, University Limoges, Limoges, France.
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Mohammed Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Pierre Benite, France.,Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Sylvaine Durand Fontanier
- Digestive Surgery Department, Dupuytren Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.,CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, University Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France
| | - Johan Gagniere
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Basile Pache
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marc Pocard
- INSERM U1275, CAP Paris-Tech, Carcinomatosis Peritoneum Paris Technology, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 7 -Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013, Paris, France
| | - François Quenet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Hugo Teixeira Farinha
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Thibaudeau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Frederic Dumont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Pierre Benite, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Strating E, Wassenaar E, Verhagen M, Rauwerdink P, van Schelven S, de Hingh I, Rinkes IB, Boerma D, Witkamp A, Lacle M, Fodde R, Volckmann R, Koster J, Stedingk K, Giesel F, de Roos R, Poot A, Bol G, Lam M, Elias S, Kranenburg O. Fibroblast activation protein identifies Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 in colorectal cancer and allows its detection by 68Ga-FAPI-PET imaging. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:145-155. [PMID: 35296803 PMCID: PMC9276750 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01748-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In colorectal cancer (CRC), the consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) is associated with therapy resistance and poor prognosis. Clinical diagnosis of CMS4 is hampered by locoregional and temporal variables influencing CMS classification. Diagnostic tools that comprehensively detect CMS4 are therefore urgently needed. Methods To identify targets for molecular CMS4 imaging, RNA sequencing data of 3232 primary CRC patients were explored. Heterogeneity of marker expression in relation to CMS4 status was assessed by analysing 3–5 tumour regions and 91.103 single-tumour cells (7 and 29 tumours, respectively). Candidate marker expression was validated in CMS4 peritoneal metastases (PM; n = 59). Molecular imaging was performed using the 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-46 PET tracer. Results Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) mRNA identified CMS4 with very high sensitivity and specificity (AUROC > 0.91), and was associated with significantly shorter relapse-free survival (P = 0.0038). Heterogeneous expression of FAP among and within tumour lesions correlated with CMS4 heterogeneity (AUROC = 1.00). FAP expression was homogeneously high in PM, a near-homogeneous CMS4 entity. FAPI-PET identified focal and diffuse PM that were missed using conventional imaging. Extra-peritoneal metastases displayed extensive heterogeneity of tracer uptake. Conclusion FAP expression identifies CMS4 CRC. FAPI-PET may have value in the comprehensive detection of CMS4 tumours in CRC. This is especially relevant in patients with PM, for whom effective imaging tools are currently lacking. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Strating
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Wassenaar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paulien Rauwerdink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van Schelven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Inne Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Witkamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Fodde
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Richard Volckmann
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Koster
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kris Stedingk
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Remmert de Roos
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Poot
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Guus Bol
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lab Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sgarbura O, Eveno C, Alyami M, Bakrin N, Guiral DC, Ceelen W, Delgadillo X, Dellinger T, Di Giorgio A, Kefleyesus A, Khomiakov V, Mortensen MB, Murphy J, Pocard M, Reymond M, Robella M, Rovers KP, So J, Somashekhar SP, Tempfer C, Van der Speeten K, Villeneuve L, Yong WP, Hübner M. Consensus statement for treatment protocols in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:1-7. [PMID: 35602919 PMCID: PMC9069497 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Safe implementation and thorough evaluation of new treatments require prospective data monitoring and standardization of treatments. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising alternative for the treatment of patients with peritoneal disease with an increasing number of suggested drug regimens. The aim was to reach expert consensus on current PIPAC treatment protocols and to define the most important research topics. Methods The expert panel included the most active PIPAC centers, organizers of PIPAC courses and principal investigators of prospective studies on PIPAC. A comprehensive literature review served as base for a two-day hybrid consensus meeting which was accompanied by a modified three-round Delphi process. Consensus bar was set at 70% for combined (strong and weak) positive or negative votes according to GRADE. Research questions were prioritized from 0 to 10 (highest importance). Results Twenty-two out of 26 invited experts completed the entire consensus process. Consensus was reached for 10/10 final questions. The combination of doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2) and cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2) was endorsed by 20/22 experts (90.9%). 16/22 (72.7%) supported oxaliplatin at 120 with potential reduction to 90 mg/m2 (frail patients), and 77.2% suggested PIPAC-Ox in combination with 5-FU. Mitomycin-C and Nab-paclitaxel were favoured as alternative regimens. The most important research questions concerned PIPAC conditions (n=3), standard (n=4) and alternative regimens (n=5) and efficacy of PIPAC treatment (n=2); 8/14 were given a priority of ≥8/10. Conclusions The current consensus should help to limit heterogeneity of treatment protocols but underlines the utmost importance of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology , Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier , Montpellier , France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194 , Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier , Montpellier , France
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery , University of Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital , Lille , France
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology , Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital , Najran , Saudi Arabia
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology , Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Pierre-Bénite , France
- Lyon University 1, EA 3738 CICLY , Lyon , France
| | - Delia Cortes Guiral
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology , Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital , Najran , Saudi Arabia
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of GI Surgery , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Xavier Delgadillo
- Centre Médico Chirurgical Volta , Unité Spécialisée de Chirurgie , La Chaux-de-Fonds , Switzerland
| | - Thanh Dellinger
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology , City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte , CA , USA
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Surgical Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Amaniel Kefleyesus
- Department of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology , Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Pierre-Bénite , France
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Vladimir Khomiakov
- P.A. Hertsen Moscow Research Oncological Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology , Moscow , Russia
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Surgery , Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) & Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Jamie Murphy
- Academic Surgical Unit , Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Marc Pocard
- Université de Paris, INSERM, U1275 CAP Paris-Tech , Paris , France
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation , Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP , Paris , France
| | - Marc Reymond
- Department of Surgery , University of Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Manuela Robella
- Unit of Surgical Oncology , Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS , Turin , Italy
| | - Koen P. Rovers
- Department of Surgery , Catharina Cancer Institute , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
| | - Jimmy So
- Division of Surgical Oncology , National University Cancer Institute , Singapore , Singapore
| | - S. P. Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical Oncology , Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Clemens Tempfer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis , Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Herne , Germany
| | | | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Lyon University 1, EA 3738 CICLY , Lyon , France
- Department of Public Health , Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Lyon , France
| | - Wei Peng Yong
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore , National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rotolo S, Di Giorgio A, Cintoni M, Rinninella E, Palombaro M, Pulcini G, Schena CA, Chiantera V, Vizzielli G, Gasbarrini A, Pacelli F, Mele MC. Body composition and immunonutritional status in patients treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for gastrointestinal peritoneal metastases: a prospective single-center analysis. Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:9-17. [PMID: 35602923 PMCID: PMC9069500 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug administration method with promising efficacy for the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of an immunonutritional assessment on the feasibility, safety, and survival in this setting.
Methods
Data of PM patients undergoing PIPAC between September 2018 and May 2020 were prospectively recorded. A CT scan-derived body composition assessment was performed for each patient.
Results
Fifty-one patients were enrolled, of which 30 (58%) underwent multiple PIPAC cycles, with a pathological response rate of 55%. Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocytes predicted completion of more than one PIPAC cycle, with a cut off of 36.5 and 4.8 respectively. Muscle attenuation and body fat tissues were associated with pathological response. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, only the presence of a low PNI (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.08–5.46) was significantly associated with a worse OS.
Conclusions
A pretreatment immunonutritional assessment may provide valuable information for PIPAC patients’ selection and survival, while body composition parameters are able to predict pathological response. Further larger studies are needed to validate the role of these biomarkers in tailoring the treatment and monitoring PM patients undergoing PIPAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Rotolo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
- Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.) , Università degli Studi di Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Marco Cintoni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Emanuele Rinninella
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Marta Palombaro
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Gabriele Pulcini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.) , Università degli Studi di Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica , UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale , Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mele
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale , Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Laoukili J, Constantinides A, Wassenaar ECE, Elias SG, Raats DAE, van Schelven SJ, van Wettum J, Volckmann R, Koster J, Huitema ADR, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT, Wiezer RJ, van Grevenstein HMU, Rinkes IHMB, Boerma D, Kranenburg O. Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer belong to Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 and are sensitised to oxaliplatin by inhibiting reducing capacity. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1824-1833. [PMID: 35194192 PMCID: PMC9174226 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01742-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Peritoneal metastases (PM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with therapy resistance and poor survival. Oxaliplatin monotherapy is widely applied in the intraperitoneal treatment of PM, but fails to yield clinical benefit. We aimed to identify the mechanism(s) underlying PM resistance to oxaliplatin and to develop strategies overcoming such resistance. Experimental design We generated a biobank consisting of 35 primary tumour regions and 59 paired PM from 12 patients. All samples were analysed by RNA sequencing. We also generated a series of PM-derived organoid (PMDO) cultures and used these to design and test strategies to overcome resistance to oxaliplatin. Results PM displayed various hallmarks of aggressive CRC biology. The vast majority of PM and paired primary tumours belonged to the Consensus Molecular Subtype 4 (CMS4). PMDO cultures were resistant to oxaliplatin and expressed high levels of glutamate-cysteine ligase (GCLC) causing detoxification of oxaliplatin through glutathione synthesis. Genetic or pharmacological targeting of GCLC sensitised PMDOs to a 1-h exposure to oxaliplatin, through increased platinum-DNA adduct formation. Conclusions These results link oxaliplatin resistance of colorectal PM to their CMS4 status and high reducing capacity. Inhibiting the reducing capacity of PM may be an effective strategy to overcome PM resistance to oxaliplatin. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamila Laoukili
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Emma C E Wassenaar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle A E Raats
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Susanne J van Schelven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jonathan van Wettum
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Volckmann
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Koster
- Department of Oncogenomics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - René J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lurvink RJ, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Bakkers C, Burger JWA, Creemers GJM, Los M, Mols F, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Patient-reported outcomes during repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (CRC-PIPAC). Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4486-4498. [PMID: 34757489 PMCID: PMC9085665 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08802-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CRC-PIPAC prospectively assessed repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) as a palliative monotherapy (i.e., without concomitant systemic therapy in between subsequent procedures) for unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The present study explored patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during trial treatment. METHODS In this single-arm phase 2 trial in two tertiary centers, patients with isolated unresectable CPM received 6-weekly PIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2). PROs (calculated from EQ-5D-5L, and EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29) were compared between baseline and 1 and 4 weeks after the first three procedures using linear mixed modeling with determination of clinical relevance (Cohen's D ≥ 0.50) of statistically significant differences. RESULTS Twenty patients underwent 59 procedures (median 3 [range 1-6]). Several PROs solely worsened 1 week after the first procedure (index value - 0.10, p < 0.001; physical functioning - 20, p < 0.001; role functioning - 27, p < 0.001; social functioning - 18, p < 0.001; C30 summary score - 16, p < 0.001; appetite loss + 15, p = 0.007; diarrhea + 15, p = 0.002; urinary frequency + 13, p = 0.004; flatulence + 13, p = 0.001). These PROs returned to baseline at subsequent time points. Other PROs worsened 1 week after the first procedure (fatigue + 23, p < 0.001; pain + 29, p < 0.001; abdominal pain + 32, p < 0.001), second procedure (fatigue + 20, p < 0.001; pain + 21, p < 0.001; abdominal pain + 20, p = 0.002), and third procedure (pain + 22, p < 0.001; abdominal pain + 22, p = 0.002). Except for appetite loss, all changes were clinically relevant. All analyzed PROs returned to baseline 4 weeks after the third procedure. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving repetitive PIPAC-OX monotherapy for unresectable CPM had clinically relevant but reversible worsening of several PROs, mainly 1 week after the first procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03246321; Netherlands trial register: NL6426.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin J. Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands ,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P. Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Emma C. E. Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W. A. Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M. Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J. Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W. Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands ,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Girardot-Miglierina A, Clerc D, Alyami M, Villeneuve L, Sgarbura O, Reymond MA, Hübner M. Consensus statement on safety measures for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Pleura Peritoneum 2021; 6:139-149. [PMID: 35071734 PMCID: PMC8719448 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising treatment for peritoneal cancer that entails, however, potential risks for the caregivers in the operating room (OR). This study aimed to reach a consensus within the PIPAC community on a comprehensive safety protocol. Methods Active PIPAC centers were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi process on 43 predefined items: concise summaries of the existing evidence were presented together with questions formulated using the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, the strength of recommendation was voted by panelists, accepting a consensus threshold of ≥50% of the agreement for any of the four grading options, or ≥70% in either direction. Results Forty-seven out of 66 invited panelists answered both rounds (response rate 76%). The consensus was reached for 41 out of 43 items (95.3%). Strong and weak recommendations were issued for 30 and 10 items, respectively. A positive consensual recommendation was issued to activate laminar airflow without specific strength, neither strong nor weak. No consensus was reached for systematic glove change for caregivers with a high risk of exposure and filtering facepiece mask class 3 for caregivers with low risk of exposure. Conclusions A high degree of consensus was reached for a comprehensive safety protocol for PIPAC, adapted to the risk of exposure for the different caregivers in the OR. This consensus can serve as a basis for education and help reach a high degree of adherence in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Girardot-Miglierina
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Daniel Clerc
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology , Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital , Najran , Saudi Arabia
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Public Health , Clinical Research and Epidemiological Unit, Lyon University Hospital , Lyon , France
- University of Lyon , Lyon , France
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology , Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM) , Montpellier , France
- University of Montpellier , Montpellier , France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier , Montpellier , France
| | - Marc-André Reymond
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery , University Hospital Tübingen and National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lurvink RJ, Rauwerdink P, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Deenen MJ, Nederend J, Huysentruyt CJR, van 't Erve I, Fijneman RJA, van der Hoeven EJRJ, Seldenrijk CA, Constantinides A, Kranenburg O, Los M, Herbschleb KH, Thijs AMJ, Creemers GJM, Burger JWA, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. First-line palliative systemic therapy alternated with electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (oxaliplatin) for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, single-arm, phase II study (CRC-PIPAC-II). BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044811. [PMID: 33785492 PMCID: PMC8011718 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite its increasing use, first-line palliative systemic therapy alternated with electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX), hereinafter referred to as first-line bidirectional therapy, has never been prospectively investigated in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). As a first step to address this evidence gap, the present study aims to assess the safety, feasibility, antitumour activity, patient-reported outcomes, costs and systemic pharmacokinetics of first-line bidirectional therapy in patients with isolated unresectable CPM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this single-arm, phase II study in two Dutch tertiary referral centres, 20 patients are enrolled. Key eligibility criteria are a good performance status, pathologically proven isolated unresectable CPM, no previous palliative systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, no (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy ≤6 months prior to enrolment and no previous pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Patients receive three cycles of bidirectional therapy. Each cycle consists of 6 weeks first-line palliative systemic therapy at the medical oncologists' decision (CAPOX-bevacizumab, FOLFOX-bevacizumab, FOLFIRI-bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab) followed by ePIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2) with an intraoperative bolus of intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2). Study treatment ends after the third ePIPAC-OX. The primary outcome is the number of patients with-and procedures leading to-grade ≥3 adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0) up to 4 weeks after the last procedure. Key secondary outcomes include the number of bidirectional cycles in each patient, treatment-related characteristics, grade ≤2 adverse events, tumour response (histopathological, cytological, radiological, biochemical, macroscopic and ascites), patient-reported outcomes, systemic pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin, costs, progression-free survival and overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is approved by the Dutch competent authority, a medical ethics committee and the institutional review boards of both study centres. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented to patients and healthcare professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL8303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien Rauwerdink
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Emma C E Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Deenen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris van 't Erve
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Imaging and Cancer, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Karin H Herbschleb
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M J Thijs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rovers KP, Lurvink RJ, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT. ASO Author Reflections: PIPAC for Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5327-5329. [PMID: 33469796 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09601-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. .,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|