Omission of Right Hemicolectomy May be Safe for Some Appendiceal Goblet Cell Adenocarcinomas: A Survival Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Predictors of Recurrence in Nonmetastatic Appendiceal Epithelial Cancers: An Updated Single-Center Experience Over 25 Years

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal epithelial tumors are rare and encompass a broad set of adenocarcinoma histologies, including mucinous (mAC), colonic-type (cAC), and goblet cell (GCA) adenocarcinomas. It has previously been reported that nodal disease predicted recurrence in patients with nonmetastatic appendiceal adenocarcinomas, supporting diagnostic laparoscopy with right hemicolectomy for staging and assessment for risk of recurrence. In this update, we sought to identify predictors of nodal disease on initial diagnostic pathology in nonmetastatic adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Patients with nonmetastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 1994 to 2020 were included. Clinicopathologic characteristics that predict recurrence and lymph node metastasis were analyzed. Workup included staging laparoscopy with right hemicolectomy, seriel imaging and biochemical monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with mAC (18%), cAC (22%), and GCAs (59%) were included. After median follow-up of 53 months, 23 (16%) patients recurred, most commonly in the peritoneal cavity (17/23, 74%). Recurrence rates were higher among node-positive patients (59% vs. 5%, P < 0.001). Nodal disease was more common in mAC (27%) and cAC (37%) than in GCA (11%); however, adenocarcinoma grade was not associated with nodal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal metastasis was more common in mAC and cAC compared with GCA and was the only significant predictor of recurrence in appendix cancer.

The Optimal Approach to Surgical Management of Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the Appendix: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) is a rare and poorly understood appendiceal neoplasm, exhibiting mixed histological and aggressive clinical features. Current guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy in all cases, although there is conflicting evidence that appendicectomy alone may be sufficient. This review aims to identify the optimal surgical management for appendiceal GCC.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies or large case series (>5 patients) reporting clinical outcomes for patients undergoing surgical management of GCC of the appendix were included. Outcomes extracted included participant and tumour characteristics, type of surgery and survival data.

RESULTS

A total of 1341 studies were retrieved. After duplicate removal, 796 titles were screened for relevance prior to abstract and full text review. A total of six studies were included for analysis, comprising 3177 patients-1629 females and 1548 males. The median age ranged from 51 to 72 years. A total of 2329 patients underwent right hemicolectomy, while 824 were treated with appendicectomy only. Overall, the included studies report increased survival in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy compared to appendicectomy alone. A meta-analysis was not possible due to insufficient data reported in the published literature to date.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical management of appendiceal GCC, as outcomes-based data comparing surgical interventions are lacking. It is possible that some patients with favourable features are overtreated. The absence of robust evidence to support a more conservative approach means that right hemicolectomy remains the standard of care for all patients, in keeping with current international guidelines. The rarity of this condition and limited data in the published studies remain barriers to evidence-based best clinical practice.

Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma with perineural invasion extending into the ileocecal lesion

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) is a rare subtype of primary appendiceal adenocarcinoma with an incidence of 1-5 per 10,000,000 people per year. Appendiceal tumors are often diagnosed after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Notably, however, there is currently no standard treatment strategy for GCA, including additional resection. We report a case of appendiceal GCA with perineural extension into the cecum, in which ileal resection was considered effective.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 41-year-old man was diagnosed with acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy. Histopathological findings revealed GCA (T3, Pn1). He was referred to our hospital for additional resection. Preoperative examination indicated a diagnosis of GCA cT3N0M0. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection and D3 lymph node dissection were performed 2 months after initial appendectomy. The patient had a good postoperative course and was discharged 8 days after surgery. Histopathological findings showed a GCA invading the cecum, despite an intact appendiceal stump, no lymph node metastasis, no vascular invasion, and no horizontal extension into the submucosa. Direct invasion of the tumor through the serosa was not observed, but perineural extension was conspicuous in the cecum, suggesting that the GCA extended into the cecum via perineural invasion. The resection margins were negative. The patient has survived free of recurrence for a year after ileocecal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The current patient was diagnosed with appendiceal GCA following appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Despite intact of appendiceal stump and no evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis, he underwent laparoscopic ileocecal resection and D3 lymph node dissection 2 months after initial appendectomy, with a favorable outcome. Despite the detection of perineural invasion, the patient declined adjuvant therapy. This case suggests that extensive resection may be required in patients with appendiceal GCA, but the role of adjuvant therapy remains unclear.

Bowel pseudo-obstruction caused by goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix is a rare diagnosis with features of both adenocarcinomas and carcinoid tumors. Commonly presenting with chronic abdominal pain, appendicitis, or abdominal distention, it can also be incidentally discovered during appendectomies.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year-old man with right lower abdominal pain was admitted to our hospital, which is a critical care center. A computed tomography(CT) scan showed ileal narrowing, but endoscopy found no strictures. He was admitted with suspected bowel obstruction and improved with an ileal tube. Laparoscopic surgery revealed a tumor of the appendix. Histologically, he was diagnosed goblet cell adenocarcinoma, suggesting tumor infiltration of nerve fibers impairing peristalsis.

DISCUSSION

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix has unique histology and a poor prognosis. Treatment typically involves surgery and chemotherapy. This case highlights challenges in preoperative diagnosis, with the tumor causing bowel pseudo-obstruction by invading the intestinal wall and nerve plexus. Extensive infiltration of Auerbach's plexus was observed, consistent with the length of intestinal stenosis.

CONCLUSION

This case describes goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix leading to bowel pseudo-obstruction due to ileal end stenosis. It emphasizes the importance of considering this diagnosis in cases of bowel obstruction without an obvious mass.

Right Hemicolectomy and Appendicectomy as Treatments for Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Two Large National Databases

INTRODUCTION

Right hemicolectomy (RHC) remains the treatment standard for goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA), despite limited evidence supporting survival benefit. This study aims to explore factors influencing surgical management and survival outcomes among patients treated with RHC or appendicectomy using NCRAS (UK) and SEER (USA) data.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using 998 (NCRAS) and 1703 (SEER) cases. Factors influencing procedure type were explored using logistic regression analyses. Overall survival (OS) probabilities and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots were generated using KM analysis and the log-rank test compared survival between groups. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess hazard ratios.

RESULTS

The NCRAS analysis revealed that age and regional stage disease were determinants of undergoing RHC, with all age groups showing similar odds of receiving RHC, excluding the 75+ age group. The SEER analysis revealed tumour size > 2 cm, and receipt of chemotherapy were determinants of undergoing RHC, unlike the distant stage, which was associated with appendicectomy. Surgery type was not a significant predictor of OS in both analyses. In NCRAS, age and stage were significant predictors of OS. In SEER, age, stage, and Black race were significant predictors of worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows variations in the surgical management of GCA, with limited evidence to support a widespread recommendation for RHC.

Case report: A rare case of coexistence of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasia and goblet cell adenocarcinoma in the appendix

Background

Primary appendiceal tumors are rare. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasia (LAMN) and goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) account for 20% and 14% of primary appendiceal tumors, respectively. The coexistence of LAMN and GCA is an extremely rare event. This report presents a case of an elderly male patient with an appendiceal tumor composed of LAMN and GCA in the same appendix.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old male patient was admitted to our institution presenting with a history of abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant for two months. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a large dilated thickened cystic mass in the appendix, along with a small duodenal diverticulum. Laboratory tests indicated elevated levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA19-9) markers. The patient underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and exploration of the duodenal diverticulum, and there was no finding of perforation of the duodenal diverticulum. Focal positivity for chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin (Syn) was observed in the tumor cells of GCA. The final pathological diagnosis revealed the coexistence of LAMN staged pT4a and grade 1 GCA staged pT3 in the appendix. Unfortunately, the patient died due to severe septic shock and circulatory failure secondary to a perforated duodenal diverticulum.

Conclusions

The coexistence of LAMN and GCA are extremely rare in the appendix and may result from the proliferation of two independent cellular lines. The coexistence of distinct neoplasms poses diagnostic and management challenges. Multidisciplinary team discussion may be essential in the effective management of these patients.

Role of colectomy in the management of appendiceal tumors: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal tumors represent a range of histologies that vary in behavior. Recommendations for treatment with appendectomy versus right hemicolectomy (RHC) for different tumor types are evolving and sometimes conflicting. This study sought to characterize variation in the United States around surgical treatment of major appendiceal tumor types over time and describe differences in outcomes based on procedure.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA), mucinous adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN), or non-mucinous adenocarcinoma from 2004-2017 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Trends in RHC over time and predictors of RHC were identified. Surgical outcomes for each histologic type and stage were compared.

RESULTS

Of 18,216 patients, 11% had GCAs, 34% mucinous adenocarcinoma, 31% NENs, and 24% non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. Rate of RHC for NEN decreased from 68% in 2004 to 40% in 2017 (p = 0.008) but remained constant around 60-75% for other tumor types. Higher stage was associated with increased odds of RHC for all tumor types. RHC was associated with higher rate of unplanned readmission (5% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and longer postoperative hospital stay (median 5 days vs. 3 days, p < 0.001). On risk-adjusted analysis, RHC was significantly associated with increased survival versus appendectomy for stage 2 disease of all tumor types (HRs 0.43 to 0.63) and for stage 1 non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with appendiceal tumors undergo RHC, which is associated with increased readmission, longer length of stay, and improved survival for stage 2 disease of all types. RHC should be offered selectively for appendiceal tumors.

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix: an update and practical approach to diagnosis and grading

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma is a rare appendiceal tumour with amphicrine differentiation that has distinct morphologic and clinical features compared to carcinomas seen elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors have engendered considerable confusion in the literature regarding their classification, and they have been described under several different names including goblet cell carcinoid, adenocarcinoid, and adenocarcinoma, among others. In the recent fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Digestive System Tumors, goblet cell adenocarcinoma is the preferred diagnosis because of the increasing recognition of a frequent co-existing high-grade adenocarcinoma component. This review will present the clinicopathologic, molecular, and immunohistochemical features of goblet cell adenocarcinoma and discuss the current challenges in diagnosis, grading, and clinical management.

Surgical indication for right hemicolectomy in goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix

We have read with interest the article by Pérez Montiel CA et al., in which goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) is described as a cause of acute appendicitis. Although the article is brilliant in terms of histopathological description of the appendiceal GCA, the surgical indication for right hemicolectomy should be analyzed in depth due to the great controversy that exists in the scientific literature.