Cholangiocarcinoma

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma relies on a thorough understanding of the tumor's location and proximity to critical vasculobiliary structures. Mid-common bile duct tumors may require hemihepatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy based on the status of the intraoperative frozen section. Distal common bile tumors are treated with pancreatoduodenectomy. When appropriate, volumetric assessment of the remnant liver should be performed to identify cases requiring preoperative liver augmentation strategies. A similar strategy should be employed for perihilar tumors, which require a right trisegmentectomy with bilioenteric reconstruction to achieve a negative margin. Adjuvant systemic therapy is recommended and increasing usage of neoadjuvant treatment is being incorporated into borderline resectable or regionally advanced cases.

Clinical Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Microsphere Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with First-Line Chemotherapy as the Initial Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination of drug-eluting microsphere (DEM) transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with those of chemotherapy in treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients diagnosed with unresectable ICC between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. Of these, 39 patients received DEM-TACE and first-line chemotherapy (TACE+Chemo group) and 31 received chemotherapy alone (Chemo group). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias between the TACE+Chemo and the Chemo groups. Differences in tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

The patients in the TACE+Chemo group had better median OS (18.6 vs 11.9 months; P = .018), median PFS (11.9 vs 6.9 months, P = .033), and objective response rates (56.8% vs 13.3%; P < .001) than those in the Chemo group. TRAEs showed a higher incidence of transient elevation of transaminase and abdominal pain in the TACE+Chemo group than in the Chemo group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with chemotherapy alone, DEM-TACE combined with first-line chemotherapy may be a viable and safe treatment option for unresectable ICC.

Intra-arterial locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the 2nd most common primary liver malignancy. For nonsurgical candidates, the primary treatment option is systemic chemotherapy, which can be combined with locoregional therapies to enhance local control. Common intra-arterial locoregional therapies include transarterial hepatic embolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres, and hepatic artery infusion. This article aims to review the latest literature on intra-arterial locoregional therapies for treating ICC.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed using keywords: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, intra-arterial locoregional therapy, embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, hepatic artery infusion, and immunotherapy. Articles from 2008 to 2024 were reviewed. Survival data from retrospective and prospective studies, meta-analyses, and clinical trials were evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Although no level I evidence supports the superiority of any specific intra-arterial therapy, there has been a shift toward favoring radioembolization. In our expert opinion, radioembolization may offer superior outcomes when performed by skilled operators with meticulous planning and personalized dosimetry, particularly for radiation segmentectomy or treating lobar/bilobar disease in appropriate candidates.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC), published in late 2022 were adapted in December 2023, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with BTC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with BTC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. Drug access and reimbursement in the different regions of Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with BTC across the different countries and regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices and molecular profiling, as well as age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional TACE (c-TACE) in the treatment of patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remained controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between c-TACE and DEB-TACE among patients with ICC.

METHOD

Between June 10, 2016 and November 19, 2022, consecutive patients with pathological diagnoses of ICC were divided into the DEB-TACE group and the c-TACE group based on the type of TACE treatment they received. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the characteristics between the c-TACE group and the DEB-TACE group.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were included in this study, with 64 patients in the c-TACE group and 68 patients in the DEB-TACE group. The median OS for c-TACE and DEB-TACE was 5 and 12 months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) for c-TACE and DEB-TACE was 0 % and 66.2 %, respectively; the disease control rate (DCR) was 37.5 % and 91.2 %. There were no significant differences between c-TACE and DEB-TACE among adverse effects at 3 months after treatment (P > 0.05). The results remained consistent after PSM. The Cox regression demonstrated that the DEB-TACE was an independent protective factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the DEB-TACE group had longer OS and higher ORR and DCR than those in the c-TACE group, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding adverse effects.

Development of machine learning models for patients in the high intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma incidence age group

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis and is understudied. Based on the clinical features of patients with ICC, we constructed machine learning models to understand their importance on survival and to accurately determine patient prognosis, aiming to develop reference values to guide physicians in developing more effective treatment plans.

METHODS

This study used machine learning (ML) algorithms to build prediction models using ICC data on 1,751 patients from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database and 58 hospital cases. The models' performances were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, C-index, and Brier scores.

RESULTS

A total of eight variables were used to construct the ML models. Our analysis identified the random survival forest model as the best for prognostic prediction. In the training cohort, its C-index, Brier score, and Area Under the Curve values were 0.76, 0.124, and 0.882, respectively, and it also performed well in the test cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the model could effectively determine patient prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to develop ML prognostic models for ICC in the high-incidence age group. Of the ML models, the random survival forest model was best at prognosis prediction.

Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines of the management of biliary tract cancers (BTC) (intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas) published in September 2023, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of BTC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C) according to the level of scientific evidence until August 2023.

RESULTS

BTC diagnosis and staging is mainly based on enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and (endoscopic) ultrasound-guided biopsy. Treatment strategy depends on BTC subtype and disease stage. Surgery followed by adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for localised disease. No neoadjuvant treatment is validated to date. Cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy combined to the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the first-line standard of care for advanced disease. Early systematic tumour molecular profiling is recommended to screen for actionable alterations (IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAFV600E mutation, MSI/dMMR status, etc.) and guide subsequent lines of treatment. In the absence of actionable alterations, FOLFOX chemotherapy is the only second-line standard-of-care. No third-line chemotherapy standard is validated to date.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice. Each individual BTC case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

Anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with radiotherapy as first-line therapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has a poor prognosis despite treatment with standard combination chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody in unresectable iCCA without distant metastases.

METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with histopathologically confirmed unresectable primary or postoperative recurrent iCCA without distant metastases were enrolled. Patients received external radiotherapy with a dose of ≥45 Gy (2-2.5 Gy per fraction), followed by anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (camrelizumab 200 mg once, every 3 weeks) initiated within 7 days after completion of radiotherapy as first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary end points included safety, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From December 2019 to March 2021, 36 patients completed radiotherapy and at least one cycle of immunotherapy and were included in efficacy and safety analyses. The median follow-up was 19.0 months (IQR 12.0-24.0), and the one-year PFS rate was 44.4% (95% CI, 30.8-64.0). The median PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-not estimable); the median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI, 15.0-not estimable). The ORR was 61.1% and the DCR was 86.1%. Seventeen of 36 (47.2%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) of any grade. The most common AE was reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (25.0%). Five (13.9%) patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, including decreased lymphocyte (5.6%), bullous dermatitis (2.8%), decreased platelet count (2.8%), and deep-vein thrombosis (2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

External radiotherapy plus camrelizumab, as first-line therapy, met its primary endpoint and showed antitumor activity and low toxicity levels in patients with unresectable iCCA without distant metastases, warranting further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03898895. Registered 2 April 2019.

Systemic chemotherapy plus transarterial chemoembolization versus systemic chemotherapy alone for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Systemic chemotherapy (SYS) is the first-line treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the survival benefit of SYS is still limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of patients with unresectable ICC treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus SYS to SYS alone.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years old with pathologically diagnosed ICC. Patients with unmeasurable lesions, not receiving SYS treatment, Child-Pugh grade C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 3 or higher, prior liver resection, incomplete medical information, or discontinuation of the first SYS treatment were excluded. Data collection was mainly from the hospital system, and the survival outcome of patients was obtained through follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbor matching algorithm was performed to reduce selection bias between the TACE plus SYS and SYS alone groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors associated with OS and to estimate their hazard ratios. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria were utilized to evaluate the response of tumors to therapy.

RESULTS

Between June 2016 and February 2023, 118 unresectable ICC patients from three hospitals were included in this study. Of them, 37 were in the TACE plus SYS group and 81 were in the SYS alone group. The median OS in the combination group was 11.3 months, longer than the 6.4 months in the SYS alone group (P = 0.011). A greater objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were observed in the combination group than in the SYS alone group (ORR, 48.65 vs. 6.17%, P < 0.001; DCR, 89.19 vs. 62.96%, P = 0.004). There were 16 patients in each group after matching, and the matched results remained consistent regarding OS and tumor response. Adverse events (AEs) were similar in the two groups after matching.

CONCLUSION

Compared to SYS alone, the combination treatment of TACE plus SYS was more effective than SYS alone in improving OS, ORR, and DCR without any significant increase in AEs. TACE plus SYS may be a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable ICC.

Evaluation of potential targets to enhance the sensitivity of cholangiocarcinoma cells to anticancer drugs

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly lethal cancer originated in the biliary tree. Available treatments for CCA are scarcely effective, partly due to mechanisms of chemoresistance, such as aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway and dysfunctional p53.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of enhancing the expression of negative regulators of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (AXIN1, AXIN2, and GSK3B) and the tumor suppressor gene TP53.

METHODS

Gene expression in paired samples of CCA and adjacent non-tumor liver tissue was determined by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Using lentiviral vectors, CCA cells were transduced with genes of interest to assess their impact on the resistome (TLDA), apoptosis (annexin V/propidium iodide), and decreased cell viability (MTT).

RESULTS

IHC revealed marked nuclear localization of β-catenin, consistent with Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation. In silico analysis with data from TCGA showed heterogeneous down-regulation of AXIN1, AXIN2, and GSK3B in CCA. Enhancing the expression of AXIN1, AXIN2, and GSK3B in CCA cells was not enough to block the activity of this signaling pathway or significantly modify resistance to 5-FU, gemcitabine, and platinated drugs. Consistent with impaired p53 function, CDKN1A was down-regulated in CCA. Forced TP53 expression induced p21 up-regulation and reduced cell proliferation. Moreover, the resistome was modified (FAS, BAX, TYMP, and CES2 up-regulation along with DHFR, RRM1, and BIRC5 down-regulation), which was accompanied by enhanced sensitivity to some antitumor drugs, mainly platinated drugs.

CONCLUSION

Enhancing TP53 expression, but not that of AXIN1, AXIN2, and GSK3B, in CCA cells may be a useful strategy to sensitize CCA to antitumor drugs.

Liver-Directed Therapy Combined with Systemic Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions

In the past several decades, major advances in both systemic and locoregional therapies have been made for many cancer patients. This has led to modern cancer treatment algorithms frequently calling for active interventions by multiple subspecialists at the same time. One of the areas where this can be clearly seen is the concomitant use of locoregional and systemic therapies in patients with primary or secondary cancers of the liver. These combined algorithms have gained favor over the last decade and are largely focused on the allure of the combined ability to control systemic disease while at the same time addressing refractory/resistant clonal populations. While the general concept has gained favor and is likely to only increase in popularity with the continued establishment of viable immunotherapy treatments, for many patients questions remain. Lingering concerns over the increase in toxicity when combining treatment methods, patient selection, and sequencing remain for multiple cancer patient populations. While further work remains, some of these questions have been addressed in the literature. This article reviews the available data on three commonly treated primary and secondary cancers of the liver, namely, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses are reviewed and future directions are discussed.

Current status and perspectives in the surgical and oncological management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver tumor after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Management depends on their resectability at the time of diagnosis. Two types can be distinguished by imaging: resectable ICCs amenable to surgery and locally advanced and/or metastatic ICCs, that are treated by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or loco-regional treatment (radioembolization, chemoembolization, intra-arterial chemotherapy and thermoablation). Over the last decade, the management strategy for these tumors has been modified by the appearance of loco-regional treatments as well as the introduction of immunotherapy that have shown their efficacy in the control of ICC. The aim of this review is to describe the current status of treatments for ICCs, as well as the different therapeutic strategies being assessed.

Holmium-166 Transarterial Radioembolization for the Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is used to treat primary and secondary malignancies in the liver that are not amenable to curative resection. Accumulating evidence demonstrates the efficacy and safety of TARE with yttrium-90 (90Y), which is the most widely used radionuclide for TARE, and later with holmium-166 (166Ho) for various indications. However, the safety and efficacy of 166Ho TARE in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains to be studied.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series study of seven consecutive patients with ICC who were treated with 166-Ho-TARE in our center. We recorded the clinical parameters and outcomes of the TARE procedures, the tumor response according to mRECIST, subsequent treatments, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Three out of the seven patients had a partial or complete response. Two patients had stable disease after the first TARE procedure, and two of the patients (one with a complete response, and one with stable disease) were alive at the time of analysis. No serious adverse events related to the procedure were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case series reporting the safety and tumor response outcomes of 166Ho-TARE for ICC. The treatment demonstrated its versatility, allowing for reaching a high tumor dose, which is important for improving tumor response and treating patients in a palliative setting, where safety and the preservation of quality of life are paramount.

Locoregional Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Treatment for Which Patient?

For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients.

A Practical Guide for the Systemic Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer in Canada

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare and aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. Radical surgery offers the best chance for cure; however, most patients present with unresectable disease, and among those receiving curative-intent surgery, recurrence rates remain high. While other locoregional therapies for unresectable disease may be considered, only select patients may be eligible. Consequently, systemic therapy plays a significant role in the treatment of BTC. In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine is recommended following curative-intent resection. In the neoadjuvant setting, systemic therapy has mostly been explored for downstaging in borderline resectable tumours, although evidence for its routine use is lacking. For advanced unresectable or metastatic disease, gemcitabine-cisplatin plus durvalumab has become the standard of care, while the addition of pembrolizumab to gemcitabine-cisplatin has also recently demonstrated improved survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Following progression on gemcitabine-cisplatin, several chemotherapy combinations and biomarker-driven targeted agents have been explored. However, the optimum regimen remains unclear, and access to targeted agents remains challenging in Canada. Overall, this article serves as a practical guide for the systemic treatment of BTC in Canada, providing valuable insights into the current and future treatment landscape for this challenging disease.

Role of genomics in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for liver-directed therapy

Only a minority of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are candidates for curative resection. Even those with disease limited to the liver may not be surgical candidates due to patient, liver, and tumor factors, including comorbidities, intrinsic liver disease, inability to establish a future liver remnant, and tumor multifocality. In addition, even after surgery, recurrence rates are high, with the liver being a predominant site of relapse. Lastly, tumor progression in the liver can sometimes result in demise for those with advanced disease. Therefore, it is not surprising that non-surgical, liver-directed therapies have emerged as both primary and complementary treatments for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for multiple stages. Liver-directed therapies can be performed directly into the tumor via thermal or non-thermal ablation, catheter-based infusion into the hepatic artery containing either cytotoxic chemotherapy or radioisotope bearing spheres/beads, or delivered via external beam radiation. Presently, these therapies' selection criteria have been based on tumor size, location, liver function, and referral to particular specialists. In recent years, molecular profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has revealed a high rate of actionable mutations, and several targeted therapies have been approved for treatment in the second-line metastatic setting. However, little is known about these alterations' role in localized disease treatments. Therefore, we will review the current molecular landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and how it has been applied to liver-directed therapy.

Update on Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocellular Carcinoma

Locoregional therapy options for CCA are used, in particular, for non-resectable tumors and aim to reduce tumor viability or delay tumor growth and ultimately prolong overall survival. In addition to local ablative procedures such as radiofrequency- or microwave-ablation, transarterial procedures such as transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), or selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) play a major role. In particular, in combination with advances in molecular medicine and immunotherapy, there has been a further development in the therapy of primary malignant liver tumors in recent years. In this review, we analyze data from recent studies and examine the implications for therapy of CCA, particularly with regard to the combination of locoregional therapies with modern systemic therapies.

New Challenges in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Liver Transplantation, Locoregional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a neoplasm with high mortality that represents 15% of all primary liver tumors. Its worldwide incidence is on the rise, and despite important advances in the knowledge of molecular mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment, overall survival has not substantially improved in the last decade. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone therapy for CCA. Unfortunately, complete resection is only possible in less than 15-35% of cases, with a risk of recurrence greater than 60%. Liver transplantation (LT) has been postulated as an effective therapeutic strategy in those intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) smaller than 3 cm. However, the low rate of early diagnosis in non-resectable patients justifies the low applicability in clinical practice. The evidence regarding LT in locally advanced iCCA is scarce and based on small, retrospective, and, in most cases, single-center case series. In this setting, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be useful in identifying a subgroup of patients with biologically less aggressive tumors in whom LT may be successful. The results of LT in pCCA are promising, however, we need a very careful selection of patients and adequate experience in the transplant center. Locoregional therapies may be relevant in unresectable, liver-only CCA. In iCCA smaller than 2 cm, particularly those arising in patients with advanced chronic liver disease in whom resection or LT may not be feasible, thermal ablation may become a reliable alternative. The greatest advances in the management of CCA occur in systemic treatment. Immunotherapy associated with chemotherapy has emerged as the gold standard in the first-line treatment. Likewise, the most encouraging results have been obtained with targeted therapies, where the use of personalized treatments has shown high rates of objective and durable tumor response, with clear signs of survival benefit. In conclusion, the future of CCA treatment seems to be marked by the development of new treatment strategies but high-quality, prospective studies that shed light on their use and applicability are mandatory.

DEB-TACE with irinotecan versus C-TACE for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective clinical study

Objectives: DEB-TACE with irinotecan and C-TACE were compared with regards to safety and efficacy for the therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: Institutional Review Board approved our trial and we registered it in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900022856). Forty patients with biopsy-confirmed ICC were randomised to either receive DEB-TACE or C-TACE treatment with 20 patients in each treatment arm. The primary endpoints objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) using the mRECIST to evaluate the tumours. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. The chi-square was used to analyse the data. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis were used to evaluate the survival data. Results: ORR (70% in DEB-TACE group vs. 20% in C-TACE, p = .001) at 1 month after therapy, ORR (50% vs. 15%, p = .018) at 3 months and DCR (70% vs. 30%, p = .011) at 6 months, while no difference was found in other groups. (all p > .05) The median PFS with DEB-TACE was longer than that with C-TACE (8.0 months vs. 3.0 months) (p = .042). Although the median OS was longer with DEB-TACE than with C-TACE (11.5 months vs. 9.0 months), the difference was not statistically significant (p = .280). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated that TACE sessions (p = .017) and low CA125 levels (p = .001) were independent favourable prognostic factors. The most frequent adverse event was elevated transaminase levels (20/20 in DEB-TACE group vs. 15/20 in C-TACE group) (p = .047). Conclusion: Our prospective study suggested better ORR and PFS with DEB-TACE with irinotecan as compared to C-TACE with irinotecan in the treatment of unresectable ICC.