Subcellular distribution of mouse mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase

Comparison of in vivo with in vitro pharmacokinetics of mercury between methylmercury chloride and methylmercury cysteine using rats and Caco2 cells

The in vivo and in vitro pharmacokinetics of mercury (Hg) were compared between methylmercury chloride (MeHg·Cl) and methylmercury cysteine (MeHg-Cys) using rats and Caco2 cells because humans can be exposed to MeHg compounds through dietary fish. The in vivo pharmacokinetics of Hg immediately after the digestion of MeHg compounds are still obscure. In Caco2 cells, membrane uptake and subcellular distribution of MeHg compounds were examined. When rats received it intravenously, MeHg·Cl showed 20-fold greater plasma and 2-fold greater blood concentrations of Hg than MeHg-Cys, indicating that their pharmacokinetic properties are different. One hour later, however, Hg concentrations in plasma and blood became virtually identical between MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys, although blood Hg concentrations were >100-fold greater than those in plasma. When administered into the closed rat's jejunum loop, MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys were rapidly and efficiently taken up by intestinal membranes, and Hg was retained in intestinal membranes for a relatively long time. When administered orally, no difference was observed in plasma and blood Hg concentrations between MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys: plasma and blood Hg concentrations increased gradually and reached steady levels at 8 h after administration. In Caco2 cells, uptake of MeHg-Cys was significantly suppressed by L-leucine, although this was not seen with MeHg·Cl. In Caco2 cells, 81 % of Hg was recovered from cytosol fractions and 13 % of Hg from nuclear fractions (including debris) after a 2-h incubation with MeHg-Cys. In conclusion, the mechanism of membrane uptake and volume of distribution in the initial distribution phase were clearly different between MeHg·Cl and MeHg-Cys. However, such pharmacokinetic differences between them disappeared 1 h after intravenous and after oral routes of administration, possibly due to the metabolism in the body.

Tissue distribution of mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase in guinea pig

We previously reported that mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase (MPD) is located in the cytosol and that MPD level in the liver is higher than in other rat tissues. In the present study, we further investigated the tissue distribution of MPD in guinea pigs by immunoblotting using anti-rat MPD antiserum. When immunoblot analysis was carried out using guinea pig brain, the antiserum reacted with 46-kDa protein as well as a substance with the same molecular weight of MPD in mice. Protein of 46-kDa detected in guinea pig liver treated with 0.1% pravastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor indicating a liver-specific effect, was increased 3-fold as compared with nontreated guinea pigs; however, 46-kDa protein in the brain treated with pravastatin was similar to that treated without pravastatin. When the subcellular distribution of MPD in the brain, liver, kidney, and testis, was examined by cell fractionation, MPD was mostly detected in the cytosol fraction of all tissues. From these data, the 46-kDa protein was identified as MPD. Next, when the tissue distribution of MPD was examined, MPD in the liver was higher than in other tissues. The relative amount of MPD in guinea pig kidney was higher than in rats and similar to in mice, as MPD in the liver of the same species was taken as 1. Furthermore, the correlation coefficient between guinea pigs and rats or mice in the tissue distribution of MPD was 0.69 or 0.72, respectively. These data indicate a relationship in tissue distribution between guinea pigs and rats or mice, although the tissue-specific regulator of MPD between species somewhat differed.

Phosphomevalonate kinase is a cytosolic protein in humans

In the past decade, a predominant peroxisomal localization has been reported for several enzymes functioning in the presqualene segment of the cholesterol/isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway. More recently, however, conflicting results have been reported raising doubts about the postulated role of peroxisomes in isoprenoid biosynthesis, at least in humans. In this study, we have determined the subcellular localization of human phosphomevalonate kinase using a variety of biochemical and microscopic techniques, including conventional subcellular fractionation studies, digitonin permeabilization studies, immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopy. We found an exclusive cytosolic localization of both endogenously expressed human phosphomevalonate kinase (in human fibroblasts, human liver, and HEK293 cells) and overexpressed human phosphomevalonate kinase (in human fibroblasts, HEK293 cells, and CV1 cells). No indication of a peroxisomal localization was obtained. Our results do not support a central role of peroxisomes in isoprenoid biosynthesis.

Human mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase is localized in the cytosol

In the past decade several reports have claimed that peroxisomes play a critical role in the isoprenoid/cholesterol biosynthetic pathway based on the finding of a predominant peroxisomal localization of several of the enzymes involved. Other reports, however, do not support the peroxisomal localization of these enzymes. In this study we have studied the subcellular localization of one of the enzymes, human mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase, by conventional subcellular fractionation and digitonin permeabilization studies, immunofluorescence microscopy, and immunoelectron microscopy. We found a cytosolic localization for both endogenous human mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase (in human fibroblasts, liver, CV1 and HEK293 cells) and overexpressed mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase (in human fibroblasts, HEK293 and CV1 cells) but no indication for a peroxisomal localization. Our results do not support a central role of peroxisomes in the isoprenoid/cholesterol biosynthetic pathway.

Mevalonate kinase is a cytosolic enzyme in humans

In the past decade several reports have appeared which suggest that peroxisomes play a central role in isoprenoid/cholesterol biosynthesis. These suggestions were based primarily on the reported finding of several of the enzymes of the presqualene segment of the biosynthetic pathway in peroxisomes. More recently, however, conflicting results have been reported raising doubt about the postulated role of peroxisomes in isoprenoid biosynthesis, at least in humans. In this study we have studied the subcellular localisation of human mevalonate kinase (MK) using a variety of biochemical and microscopical techniques. These include conventional subcellular fractionation studies, digitonin permeabilisation studies, immunofluorescence microscopy and immunocytochemistry. We exclusively found a cytosolic localisation of both endogenous human MK (human fibroblasts, liver and HEK293 cells) and overexpressed human MK (human fibroblasts, HEK293 cells and CV1 cells). No indication of a peroxisomal localisation was obtained. Our results do not support a central role for peroxisomes in isoprenoid biosynthesis.