V˙O2peak, Body Composition, and Neck Strength of Elite Motor Racing Drivers

Prompted hands-free drinking improves simulated race car driving in a hot environment

Race car drivers are often hypohydrated during a race. The FluidLogic drink system is a hands-free, prompted drinking system that is hypothesized to increase the likeliness of drivers' consuming fluids and thereby mitigating hypohydration. To test the hypothesis, 20 elite professional race car drivers participated in a 2-day cross-over study in which they drove on a race simulator in an environmental chamber that was heated to regulation cockpit temperature (38°C). Drivers used either the FluidLogic drink system or a standard in-car water bottle system (Control) on one of each testing day. The results indicated that there was consistent fluid consumption with the FluidLogic system, while the Control condition elicited fluid consumption in bolus doses. The Control condition was associated with moderate (0.5%) increased core body temperature (P < 0.05) and substantial (3.3%) increased urine-specific gravity (P < 0.001) as compared to the FluidLogic condition. Driving performance metrics indicated that lap times during the Control Condition were 5.1 ± 1.4 (4.1%) seconds slower (P < 0.05) than the FluidLogic Condition, due to driving errors that occurred in the high-speed corners. Based on these results, prompted hands-free drinking can mitigate hypohydration and performance loss in automobile racing drivers.

Application of a Reactive Agility Training Program Using Light-Based Stimuli to Enhance the Physical and Cognitive Performance of Car Racing Drivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

There is a need to develop strategies that could contribute to the physical and mental preparation of motorsport athletes. A common method used by experienced motorsport athlete physical trainers is flashing light devices to train or assess reactive agility, despite limited evidence. Therefore, in the present study, we determined the effects of a 6-week reactive agility training program using light-based stimuli on the physiological and cognitive abilities of car racing drivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CONSORT guidelines for randomized controlled trial were used. In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 24 car racing drivers (EXP, n = 12; CON, n = 12) performed a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests marketed specifically at motorsport athletes from Vienna test system (VTS) at rest or during moderate intensity exercise on a bicycle. Physiological abilities were determined via a maximal incremental cardio-respiratory treadmill test. Baseline and post-intervention tests were performed on three consecutive days. Participants in EXP underwent a 6-week intervention consisting of 60-min training sessions twice a week using the Witty SEM light stimulus.

RESULTS

Participants in EXP but not in CON performed some of the VTS cognitive tasks with higher accuracy and/or shorter reaction time after the intervention at rest and during exercise. Car racing drivers performed the STROOP word-reading condition more accurately when the task was performed during the exercise vs. rest, regardless of group. In addition, the intervention induced beneficial changes in peak heart rate (HR), HR at gas exchange threshold, ventilation, and relative maximal oxygen consumption (rVO₂ max). In contrast, body mass and fat mass increased, while peak HR and rVO₂ max decreased in CON. Finally, participants in EXP improved their reactive agility performance and reaction time throughout the training program.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the reactive agility training program using light-based stimuli appeared to be efficient to induce beneficial effects on some physiological and cognitive performance measures; therefore, it may have the potential to contribute to car racing drivers' physical and mental performance.

Responses of Driver-Athletes to Repeated Driving Stints

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine and quantify the effect of repeated driving stints on the physiologic, metabolic, and hormonal responses of three professional endurance driver-athletes.

METHODS

Core body temperature, HR, and physiological strain index were recorded during the Rolex 24 Hours of Daytona endurance race using the Equivital Life Monitor system. Blood glucose was monitored continuously during the event using a FreeStyle Libre Pro (Abbott, Alameda, CA). Alpha-amylase and cortisol were sampled immediately before the beginning of a stint and immediately after.

RESULTS

First-stint overall and individual driver-athlete responses were similar to those reported in the literature. Later-stint responses diverged from the literature. Reductions in initial core temperature, absence of increases in HR and physiological strain index, and altered glucose and hormonal responses were each observed in the later stint.

CONCLUSION

The data support previous research showing that motorsports has a measurable physiological, metabolic, and hormonal effect on the driver-athlete. This study also shows that multiple stints elicit responses that deviate from the published literature on single-stint events. This study is also particularly interesting in that it represents one of the first times that longitudinal data have been gathered on endurance racing driver-athletes.

Cockpit Temperature as an Indicator of Thermal Strain in Sports Car Competition

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between race car cockpit temperature and thermal strain indicators among race car drivers.

METHODS

Four male racing drivers' heart rate (HR), skin temperature (Tskin), and core temperature (Tcore) were measured continuously using the Equivital Life Monitor bio harness, and physiological strain index (PSI) was calculated during a hot (ambient temperature of 34.1°C ± 2.8°C) 6-h endurance race. Only data collected during green flag racing laps were analyzed.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional analyses showed that cockpit temperature did not have a significant relationship with percent of HRmax, Tskin, Tcore, or PSI (P > 0.05) during the race. Cockpit temperature decreased during driving time, whereas percent of HRmax, Tskin, Tcore, and PSI increased (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cockpit temperature does not correlate with measures of race car driver thermal strain. Therefore, metrics to determine driver thermal strain should include direct monitoring of the race car driver.

A Comparison of the Physiological Responses in Professional and Amateur Sports Car Racing Drivers

Purpose:Automobile racing is physically challenging, but there is no information related to experience level and physiological responses to racing. The aim of this study was to compare physiological responses of professional (PRO) and amateur (AM) sportscar drivers. Methods:Four male racing drivers (PRO n = 2, AM n = 2), completed a physical fitness assessment and had heart rate (HR), breathing rate 10 (BR), skin temperature (T_sk), core temperature (T_core), physiological strain index (PSI) and blood glucose (BG) measured continuously during six races. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate, and fluid loss were measured post-race. Results:AM had higher HR compared to PRO during driver changes (AM: 177 ± 12 beats·min^-1, PRO: 141 ± 16 beats·min^-1, p < .0001), pit stops (AM: 139 ± 14 beats·min^-1, PRO: 122 ± 1 beats·min^-1, p = .0381) and cautions (AM: 144 ± 13 beats·min^-1, PRO: 15 123 ± 11 beats·min^-1, p = .0059). During pit stops, PRO (26 ± 6 respirations·min^-1) displayed a significantly greater BR than AM (AM: 18 ± 7 respirations·min^-1, p = .0004). T_core was greater for PRO (38.4 ± 0.4°C) drivers while in the car during pit stops than AM (36.1 ± 2.5°C, p < .0001). AM displayed elevated PSI during cautions (AM: 5.5 ± 1.8, PRO: 3.2 ± 1.3, p < .0001) and pit stops (AM: 5.6 ± 1.4, PRO: 2.8 ± 1.1, p < .0001). BG was increased for AM versus PRO during pit stops (AM: 20 132.9 ± 20.2 mg·dl^-1, PRO: 106.5 ± 3.5 mg·dl^-1, p = .0015) and during racing (AM: 150.9 ± 34.6 mg·dl^-1, PRO: 124.9 ± 16.0 mg·dl^-1, p = .0018). AM (3.3 ± 1.7 mmol·dl^-1) had a higher blood lactate than PRO (1.7 ± 2.6 mmol·dl^-1, p = .0491) from pre to post-race. AM (1.90 ± 0.54 kg) lost more fluids over the race than PRO (1.36 ± 0.67 kg, p = .0271). Conclusions:Amateur drivers could fatigue faster in the car which results in a decreased driving performance.

The Physiology of Auto Racing

INTRODUCTION

Auto racing poses a unique set of physiologic challenges for athletes who compete in this sport. These challenges are not widely recognized due to the limited amount of original research in this field and the diffuse nature of this literature. The purpose of this article is to review the major physiologic challenges of auto racing and summarize what is currently known about athletes in this sport.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical stressors of either driving or servicing the race car are overlaid with particular environmental challenges associated with racing (e.g., thermal, noise, carbon monoxide exposure) that increase the physiological stress on motorsport athletes. Physical stress reflects the muscular work required for car control and control of posture during high gravitational (g) loads: factors that predispose athletes to fatigue. The physiologic effects of these stressors include cardiovascular stress as reflected by prolonged elevation of heart rate, cardiac output, and oxygen consumption in both driver and pit athletes during competition. Psychological stress is evident in autonomic and endocrine responses of athletes during competition. The thermal stress of having to compete wearing multilayer fire suits and closed helmets in ambient temperatures of 50°C to 60°C results in the ubiquitous risk of dehydration. Published data show that both drivers and pit crew members are accomplished athletes with distinct challenges and abilities. There are gaps in the literature, especially in regard to female, older adult, and child participants. Additionally, minimal literature is available on appropriate training programs to offset the physiological challenges of auto racing.