Kinematic Sequence Classification and the Relationship to Pitching Limb Torques

Waveform Analysis To Identify Biomechanical Relationships and Differences Between Softball Pitchers With and Without Pain

BACKGROUND

Softball pitchers accrue high rates of injury. Research suggests certain mechanics at discrete pitch events are related with pain. Here, we examine relationships between peak throwing shoulder kinetics and trunk/pelvis kinematics and compare trunk/pelvis kinematics between pitchers who were healthy and those currently experiencing pain.

HYPOTHESIS

(1) Peak shoulder kinetics would be positively related to greater trunk and pelvis flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation; and (2) pitchers in pain would exhibit greater trunk and pelvis flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation during the pitch than those who were pain-free.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A total of 42 high school pitchers (height, 1.71 ± 0.06 m; weight, 75.0 ± 15.9 kg; age, 16 ± 2 years) were separated into 2 groups based on presence or absence of pain. Peak kinetic data from 3 pitches per pitcher were averaged and used as dependent variables. Kinematic data were averaged across 3 trials, and time normalized to 101 datapoints between foot contact and follow-through of the pitch. Statistical parametric mapping regressions were used to assess the relationships between peak shoulder kinetics and waveform of trunk and pelvis kinematics.

RESULTS

Pelvic lateral tilt significantly predicted peak throwing shoulder superior (P = 0.05) and lateral (P = 0.04) force. Pelvis rotation predicted peak superior force (P = 0.02). Waveform analyses revealed no waveform differences between healthy pitchers and those currently experiencing pain.

CONCLUSION

Peak shoulder kinetic variables are related with pelvic positioning during the pitch; however, trunk and pelvis kinematics do not differ according to presence of pain.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Pitchers in pain do not adopt specific trunk and pelvic alterations during the pitch, potentially concealing the effects of pain from visual identification. Coaches and clinicians need to discuss health status with pitchers versus relying on visual observations to understand pain and injury risk.

A Comparison of Throwing Arm Kinetics and Ball Velocity in High School Pitchers With Overall Fast and Overall Slow Cumulative Joint and Segment Velocities

BACKGROUND

Individual maximum joint and segment angular velocities have shown positive associations with throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in baseball pitchers.

PURPOSE

To observe how cumulative maximum joint and segment angular velocities, irrespective of sequence, affect ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school pitchers.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

High school (n = 55) pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximum joint and segment angular velocities (lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, trunk rotation, shoulder internal rotation, and forearm pronation) were calculated for each pitcher. Pitchers were classified as overall fast, overall slow, or high velocity for each joint or segment velocity subcategory, or as population, with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared among the various subgroups using t tests with post hoc regressions and multivariable regression models created to predict throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity, respectively.

RESULTS

The lead knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity subgroups achieved significantly higher normalized elbow varus torque (P = .016) and elbow flexion torque (P = .018) compared with population, with equivalent ball velocity (P = .118). For every 1-SD increase in maximum pelvis rotation velocity (87 deg/s), the normalized elbow distractive force increased by 4.7% body weight (BW) (B = 0.054; β = 0.290; P = .013). The overall fast group was older (mean ± standard deviation, 16.9 ± 1.4 vs 15.4 ± 0.9 years; P = .007), had 8.9-mph faster ball velocity (32.7 ± 3.1 vs 28.7 ± 2.3 m/s; P = .002), and had significantly higher shoulder internal rotation torque (63.1 ± 17.4 vs 43.6 ± 12.0 Nm; P = .005), elbow varus torque (61.8 ± 16.4 vs 41.6 ± 11.4 Nm; P = .002), and elbow flexion torque (46.4 ± 12.0 vs 29.5 ± 6.8 Nm; P < .001) compared with the overall slow group. A multiregression model for ball velocity based on maximum joint and segment angular velocities and anthropometrics predicted 53.0% of variance.

CONCLUSION

High school pitchers with higher maximum joint and segment velocities, irrespective of sequence, demonstrated older age and faster ball velocity at the cost of increased throwing shoulder and elbow kinetics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Pitchers and coaching staff should consider this trade-off between faster ball velocity and increasing throwing arm kinetics, an established risk factor for elbow injury.

An Analysis of Intrapitch Variation in Joint and Segment Velocities With Throwing Arm Kinetics in High School and Professional Baseball Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Improper sequencing order of maximal joint and segment velocities has been identified as an important predictor for both throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity.

PURPOSE

To investigate the intrapitcher variation of maximal segment velocities and the relationship to throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in high school (HS) and professional (PRO) pitchers.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

HS (n = 59) and PRO (n = 338) pitchers, instructed to throw 8 to 12 fastball pitches, were evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximal joint and segment velocities were calculated for each pitch, and the standard deviation of the maxima was calculated per pitcher. These standard deviations were used to classify pitchers as "low variance" or "high variance" for each segmental velocity subgroup, "overall low variance" or "overall high variance" based on cumulative segment velocity variation, or "population," with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Maximal velocities and throwing arm kinetics were compared among the various subgroups.

RESULTS

The HS low-variance shoulder internal rotation velocity subgroup (4949 ± 642 deg/s) had significantly lower maximal shoulder internal rotation velocity compared with HS population (5774 ± 1057 deg/s) (P < .001); similar findings were observed for PROs (5269 ± 835 vs 5824 ± 1076 deg/s; P < .001), as well as lower shoulder superior force compared with the PRO population (14.8% ± 8.8% vs 17.8% ± 8.8% body weight; P = .001). The PRO low-variance lead knee extension velocity subgroup had significantly lower maximal lead knee extension velocity (216 ± 135 vs 258 ± 125 deg/s; P = .001) and shoulder distractive force (111.5% ± 14.4% vs 115.6% ± 15.9% body weight; P = .003) compared with the PRO population. The PRO overall low-variance subgroup had significantly lower shoulder distractive force (111.8% ± 14.1% vs 119.6% ± 15.5% body weight; P = .008) and elbow anterior force (40.6% ± 5.0% vs 43.6% ± 6.2% body weight; P = .008) compared with the PRO overall high-variance subgroup.

CONCLUSION

HS and PRO pitchers with low variance for joint and segment velocities achieved significantly lower maximal velocities in the subgroup of interest, while preserving ball velocity. PRO pitchers with overall low variance among multiple maximal joint and segment velocities demonstrated decreased shoulder distractive and elbow anterior force.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PRO pitchers with low intrapitch variation in maximal joint and segment velocities may be viewed as kinetically conservative throwers. These pitchers with similarly maintained mechanics between pitches may have an increasingly regimented form that preserves kinetic forces about the throwing arm. The opposite may be true for PRO pitchers with increased variability in segmental velocities during their pitching motion, as they showed increased throwing arm kinetics including shoulder distractive and elbow anterior force compared with the overall low-variance group, theoretically increasing their risk of injury.

Relationship Between Arm Path, Ball Velocity, and Elbow Varus Torque in Professional Baseball Pitchers

Background

Currently, most pitching instructors suggest a shorter arm path-the total distance the arm travels during pitching. Theoretically, this combination allows for better body segment sequencing, a more efficient energy transfer through the kinetic chain, and increased ball velocity, while limiting elbow varus torque.

Hypothesis

Shorter arm paths would be associated with increased ball velocity and decreased elbow varus torque.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 182 professional pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while evaluated by 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). The arm path was calculated as the total distance the hand marker traveled during the pitch. The pitch was divided into early, late, and total arm paths. A linear regression model assessed the interpitcher relationship between arm path, elbow varus torque, and ball velocity. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts assessed intrapitcher relationships.

Results

Interpitcher comparison showed that total arm path weakly correlated with greater elbow varus torque (P = .025). Strong correlations were found between ball velocity and early (R2 = 0.788; P < .001), late (R2 = 0.787; P = .024), and total arm paths (R2 = 0.792; P < .001). Strong positive intrapitcher correlations were found between elbow varus torque and early (R2 = 0.962; P < .001) and total arm path (R2 = 0.964; P < .001). For individual pitchers, there was a large variation in the early (30.1 ± 15.7 cm) and late (21.4 ± 12.1 cm) arm path. For every 30-cm (11.8-inch) increase in early arm path (the mean range for an individual pitcher), there was a 1.29-N (β = 0.0429) increase in elbow varus torque and a 0.354 m/s (0.79 mph) (β = 0.0118) increase in ball velocity.

Conclusion

A shorter arm path correlated with decreased elbow varus torque and decreased ball velocity in intrapitcher comparisons. Determining the individual mechanics that decrease elbow varus torque may help coaches and trainers correct these patterns.

Clinical Significance

A shorter arm path during the pitch can decrease elbow varus torque, which limits the load on the medial elbow but also has a detrimental effect on ball velocity. An improved understanding of the impact of shortening arm paths on stresses on the throwing arm may help minimize injury risk.

Characteristics of upper limb mass, muscle CSA and stiffness in adolescent baseball players with and without elbow injury

Since elbow injuries are common in adolescent baseball players, this study aimed to determine the relationship between musculoskeletal status and elbow injuries in 47 baseball players aged 12-14 years. Participants answered a questionnaire and had their general body measurements taken. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate muscle cross sectional areas (CSA) of the upper arm flexor and extensor muscles, and x-ray absorptiometry was used to determine the mass of the upper arm and the total mass of the forearm and hand. Shear wave elastography was used to determine muscle stiffness of the biceps brachii, brachialis, pronator teres, and brachioradialis. An orthopedic surgeon performed a clinical assessment and elbow ultrasonography for each participant to diagnose elbow injuries. The measured values were compared between the elbow injury and control groups using two-sample t-tests. The elbow injury group had significantly higher muscle stiffness in the brachialis (p < 0.001) and brachioradialis (p = 0.004) muscles and greater elbow flexor CSA of the distal upper arm (p = 0.004) than the control group. The total mass of the forearm and hand and the mass ratio of the forearm and hand to the upper arm were significantly greater in the elbow injury group than in the control group (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Thus, it may be necessary to increase flexibility of the brachialis and brachioradialis flexible by stretching and massaging in addition to evaluating the mass distal to the elbow and the elbow flexor muscle size of the distal upper arm to manage elbow injury in youth baseball players. Characteristics of Upper Limb Mass, Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Stiffness in Adolescent Baseball Players with and without Elbow Injury.

Role of Pelvis and Trunk Biomechanics in Generating Ball Velocity in Baseball Pitching

ABSTRACT

Orishimo, KF, Kremenic, IJ, Mullaney, MJ, Fukunaga, T, Serio, N, and McHugh, MP. Role of pelvis and trunk biomechanics in generating ball velocity in baseball pitching. J Strength Cond Res 37(3): 623-628, 2023-The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of pelvis rotation velocity, trunk rotation velocity, and hip-shoulder separation on ball velocity during baseball pitching. Fastball pitching kinematics were recorded in 29 male pitchers (age 17 ± 2 years, 23 high school, 6 college). Pelvis and trunk angular velocities and hip-shoulder separation were calculated and averaged for the 3 fastest pitches. Associations between peak pelvis velocity, peak trunk velocity, hip-shoulder separation at foot contact, and ball velocity were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression. The average ball velocity was 33.5 ± 2.8 m·s -1 . The average hip-shoulder separation at foot contact was 50 ± 12°. The peak pelvis velocity (596 ± 88°·s -1 ) occurred at 12 ± 11% of the time from stride foot contact to ball release, with the peak trunk velocity (959 ± 120°·s -1 ) occurring at 36 ± 11%. Peak trunk velocity was predictive of ball velocity ( p = 0.002), with 25% of the variability in ball velocity explained. No combination of factors further explained ball velocity. Hip-shoulder separation at foot contact (17%, p = 0.027), peak pelvis velocity (23%, p = 0.008), and the timing of peak pelvis velocity (16%, p = 0.031) individually predicted peak trunk velocity. The combination of peak pelvis velocity, hip-shoulder separation at foot contact, and the timing of peak trunk velocity explained 55% of the variability in trunk rotation velocity ( p < 0.001). These data highlight the importance of interactions between pelvis and trunk for maximizing velocity in pitching. Training to improve pelvis-trunk axial dissociation may increase maximal trunk rotation velocity and thereby increase ball velocity without increasing training load on the shoulder and elbow.

Disabled Throwing Shoulder 2021 Update: Part 1-Anatomy and Mechanics

The purpose of this article is to provide updated information for sports health care specialists regarding the Disabled Throwing Shoulder (DTS). A panel of experts, recognized for their experience and expertise in this field, was assembled to address and provide updated information on several topics that have been identified as key areas in creating the DTS spectrum. Each panel member submitted a concise presentation on one of the topics within these areas, each of which were then edited and sent back to the group for their comments and consensus agreement in each area. Part 1 presents the following consensus conclusions and summary findings regarding anatomy and mechanics, including: 1) The current understanding of the DTS identifies internal impingement, resulting from a combination of causative factors, as the final common pathway for the great majority of the labral pathoanatomy; 2) intact labral anatomy is pivotal for glenohumeral stability, but its structure does not control or adapt well to shear or translational loads; 3) the biceps plays an active role in dynamic glenohumeral stability by potentiating "concavity compression" of the glenohumeral joint; 4) the ultimate function of the kinetic chain is to optimize the launch window, the precise biomechanical time, and position for ball release to most effectively allow the ball to be thrown with maximum speed and accuracy, and kinetic chain function is most efficient when stride length is optimized; 5) overhead throwing athletes demonstrate adaptive bony, capsular, and muscular changes in the shoulder with repetitive throwing, and precise measurement of shoulder range of motion in internal rotation, external rotation, and external rotation with forearm pronation is essential to identify harmful and/or progressive deficits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Joint and segment sequencing and its relationship to ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in professional pitchers

BACKGROUND

Temporal variations during the pitch have demonstrated significant impacts on the kinetic chain, and as such, have implications in injury risk.

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of varying chronological orders of maximum joint and segment velocities on ball velocity and upper extremity kinetics.

METHODS

Professional baseball pitchers (n = 287) were assessed with 3D-motion capture (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitches were categorized into one of the following groups dependent on the first maximum joint or segment velocity achieved out of chronological order in an inferior to superior direction: knee extension (DscK), pelvis rotation (DscP), trunk rotation (DscT), shoulder rotation (DscS), forearm pronation (DscF), and Proper (for pitchers with the correct temporal sequence), and Total Population, for all pitchers. Ten normalized throwing arm kinetic variables were compared among groups. Regression analysis was conducted on the timing of maximum velocities with ball velocity.

RESULTS

The majority of pitches were in the DscK group (64.5%). The DscK group had a significantly slower maximum lead knee extension velocity compared with the Proper group (253°/s vs. 316°/s, P = .017). The Proper group had a significantly faster ball velocity compared with the Total Population (39.0 ± 1.9 m/s vs. 38.3 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .013). The DscP group had a significantly slower maximum pelvis rotation velocity compared with the Proper group (596°/s vs. 698°/s, P < .001). The Proper group had no significant difference in kinetics relative to the population. For every 1 standard deviation delay in attaining maximum lead knee extension velocity, ball velocity increased by 0.38 m/s (B = 3.5, β = 0.18, P < .001). For every 1 standard deviation delay in timing to achieve maximum pelvis rotation velocity, maximum pelvis rotation velocity and ball velocity increased by 22.5°/s (B = 1107.0, β = 0.23, P < .001) and 0.48 m/s (B = 23.4, β = 0.23, P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pitchers with a discordant sequence of knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity timing had significantly slower corresponding segment/joint velocities. Conversely, pitchers with a proper sequence had the fastest ball velocity with minimal differences in throwing arm kinetics. To maximize ball velocity, professional pitchers should consider achieving maximal velocities in an inferior to superior chronological sequence, with a particular focus on the knee and pelvis.

Rotational Medicine Ball Throw Velocity Relates to NCAA Division III College Baseball Player Bat Swing, Batted Baseball, and Pitching Velocity

ABSTRACT

Taniyama, D, Matsuno, J, Yoshida, K, Pyle, B, and Nyland, J. Rotational medicine ball throw velocity relates to NCAA Division III college baseball player bat swing, batted baseball, and pitching velocity. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3414-3419, 2021-Previous studies have evaluated relationships between baseball batting or pitching and whole-body power tests such as rotational medicine ball throw velocity (RMBTV) (transverse plane), lateral-to-medial hop for distance (frontal plane), and two-legged standing broad jump for distance (sagittal plane). However, no previous report has evaluated all 3 whole-body power tests in the same study to determine their relationship to bat swing velocity or pitching velocity. The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine correlational relationship strength between bat swing velocity, batted baseball velocity, and throwing velocity with 2-legged standing broad jump for distance, lateral-to-medial jump for distance, and RMBTV whole-body power tests in collegiate baseball players. Thirty-five NCAA Division III players (15 pitchers and 23 hitters; 3 players played pitcher and other positions) participated in this study. An alpha value of p < 0.05 was selected to indicate statistical significance. Moderate relationships were observed between bat swing velocity and RMBTV (r = 0.65, p = 0.003), explaining 39% of the variance, and between pitching velocity and RMBTV (r = 0.62, p = 0.02), explaining 38% of the variance. A moderate correlation was also observed between batted baseball velocity and RMBTV (r = 0.53, p = 0.02), explaining 28% of the variance. Only the RMBTV whole-body power test displayed significant relationships with bat swing velocity, batted baseball velocity, and pitching velocity. Significant relationships were not identified for either the two-legged standing broad jump for distance or the lateral-to-medial jump for distance whole-body power tests and bat swing velocity or pitching velocity. Further studies should evaluate whether the coordination developed during RMBTV movements can decrease baseball shoulder and elbow injuries associated with repetitive, poorly timed, sequential lower extremity-trunk-upper extremity whole-body movements.

Increased Shoulder Distraction Force and Shoulder Horizontal Abduction in Professional Baseball Pitchers With Discordant Torso Rotation Order

BACKGROUND

Inefficient energy transfer from the pelvis and trunk has been shown to increase compensation at the level of the shoulder. Kinetic chain sequencing of the core segments is underexamined in professional baseball pitchers, especially as it relates to changes in upper extremity kinetics.

PURPOSE

To evaluate elbow and shoulder kinetics in a cohort of professional pitchers differentiated by instances of discordant pelvic to upper torso sequencing during the pitch.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

285 professional baseball pitchers were evaluated using 3D motion capture (480 Hz). Pitchers were divided into "chronological" and "discordant" groups based on whether maximum pelvic rotation velocity occurred before (chronological) or after (discordant) maximum upper torso rotation velocity during the pitch motion. Pelvic, upper torso, and shoulder kinematic parameters, shoulder distraction force, shoulder internal rotation torque, and pitch efficiency (PE) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Pitchers with discordant torso sequencing (n = 30; 110 pitches) had greater shoulder horizontal adduction at maximum external rotation (mean difference, 3.6°; 95% CI, -5.2° to -2.0°; t = -4.5; P < .001) and greater maximum shoulder external rotation (mean difference, 3.7°; 95% CI, 5.7° to 1.5°; t = -3.5; P < .001) than chronological pitchers (n = 255; 2974 pitches). PE did not differ between groups (P = .856), whereas ball velocity was significantly faster in the discordant group (mean difference, 0.6 m/s; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.3 m/s; t = -3.3; P = .0012). Chronological pitchers had significantly reduced shoulder distraction force (mean difference, -4.7% body weight (BW); 95% CI, -7.9% to -1.5% BW; t = -2.9; P = .004) with no difference in shoulder internal rotation torque (P = .160). These kinematic and kinetic differences were not observed when accounting for interpitcher variability.

CONCLUSION

Between pitchers, those who had a discordant pelvic to upper torso sequence experienced significantly greater shoulder distraction forces, potentially compensating by increasing maximum shoulder external rotation and horizontal abduction. Achieving maximal pelvic rotation velocity before maximal rotation velocity may be advantageous in preventing compensation at the upper extremity and excessive throwing arm loading.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Identifying risk factors for increased upper extremity forces has potential implications in injury prevention. Specifically, mitigating shoulder distraction forces may be beneficial in reducing risk of injury.

Predicting Shoulder Force to Prevent Injury: Body Fat Mass Increases Shoulder Stress among Pitchers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between whole body and throwing arm composition and length with throwing shoulder distraction and anterior force. While literature shows a relationship between shoulder force and pain, as well as between body mass and pain, it was hypothesized that pitchers with greater body fat mass would display increased throwing shoulder force during the acceleration phase of the softball pitch.

METHODS

Thirty-eight high school softball pitchers from southern United States agreed to participate (1.69 ± .07 m, 74.71 ± 16.36 kg, 15.2 ± 1.1 years). All procedures were completed within one visit. Pitchers underwent a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan then threw fastballs at regulation distance while motion was measured using an electromagnetic motion capture system. Data from the three fastest pitches were averaged and analyzed. Peak shoulder distraction and anterior force during the acceleration phase of the softball pitch were extracted and used as dependent variables in two separate regression analyses. Whole body and throwing arm fat mass and lean mass, as well as throwing arm length were entered as independent variables into both regression equations.

RESULTS

The first regression equation was statistically significant, F(5,37) = 13.28, p < .001 and explained approximately 62% of the variance in peak shoulder distraction force (R2 = .675, Adj. R2 = .624). Increased whole body fat mass (B = 13.76, SE = 5.39, Beta = .91, t = 2.553, p = .016) significantly predicted peak throwing shoulder distraction force. The second regression equation predicting peak anterior force was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Increased fat mass may exacerbate the high force observed at the throwing shoulder and further increase injury susceptibility to pitchers.

Association of Pitch Timing and Throwing Arm Kinetics in High School and Professional Pitchers

BACKGROUND

Understanding the relationship between the temporal phases of the baseball pitch and subsequent joint loading may improve our understanding of optimal pitching mechanics and contribute to injury prevention in baseball pitchers.

PURPOSE

To investigate the temporal phases of the pitching motion and their associations with ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school (HS) and professional (PRO) baseball pitchers.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

PRO (n = 317) and HS (n = 54) baseball pitchers were evaluated throwing 8 to 12 fastball pitches using 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Four distinct phases of the pitching motion were evaluated based on timing of angular velocities: (1) Foot-Pelvis, (2) Pelvis-Torso, (3) Torso-Elbow, and (4) Elbow-Ball. Peak elbow varus torque, shoulder internal rotation torque, and shoulder distraction force were also calculated and compared between playing levels using 2-sample t tests. Linear mixed-effect models with compound symmetry covariance structures were used to correlate pitch velocity and throwing arm kinetics with the distinct temporal phases of the pitching motion.

RESULTS

PRO pitchers had greater weight and height, and faster ball velocities than HS pitchers (P < .001). There was no difference in total pitch time between groups (P = .670). PRO pitchers spent less time in the Foot-Pelvis (P = .010) and more time in the Pelvis-Torso (P < .001) phase comparatively. Shorter time spent in the earlier phases of the pitching motion was significantly associated with greater ball velocity for both PRO and HS pitchers (Foot-Pelvis: B = -6.4 and B = -11.06, respectively; Pelvis-Torso: B = -6.4 and B = -11.4, respectively), while also associated with increased shoulder proximal force (Pelvis-Torso: B = -76.4 and B = -77.5, respectively). Decreased time in the Elbow-Ball phase correlated with greater shoulder proximal force for both cohorts (B = -1150 and B = -645, respectively) with no significant correlation found for ball velocity.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in temporal phases exist between PRO and HS pitchers. For all pitchers, increased time spent in the final phase of the pitching motion has the potential to decrease shoulder distraction force with no significant loss in ball velocity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Identifying risk factors for increased shoulder and elbow kinetics, acting as a surrogate for loading at the respective joints, has potential implications in injury prevention.

Comparison of Kinematic Sequences During Curveball and Fastball Baseball Pitches

Performance of a sequential proximal-to-distal transfer of segmental angular velocity (or Kinematic Sequence) is reported to reduce stress on musculoskeletal structures and thus the probability of injury while also maximizing ball velocity. However, there is limited investigation regarding the Kinematic Sequence of the five body segments (Pelvis, Trunk, Arm, Forearm, and Hand) among baseball pitchers. Some biomechanical and epidemiology studies have reported an association of the curveball with increased risk for elbow injury among youth pitchers. Kinematic Sequences with altered distal upper extremity (forearm and hand) sequences have been associated with greater elbow valgus and shoulder external rotation torques compared to other Kinematic Sequences. Identifying Kinematic Sequence patterns during curveball pitches may lead to improved understanding of injury susceptibility. This study investigated the Kinematic Sequence patterns (and their variability) during curveball pitching and compared them to the sequences identified during fastball pitches. Using 3D motion analyses, 14 baseball pitchers (four high school, eight college, and two professional) performed 5–6 curveball pitches and 12 pitchers also threw fastball pitches in a simulated bullpen session. Eleven different curveball Kinematic Sequences were identified and 8 fastball Kinematic Sequences. There was no significant variability in the number of Kinematic Sequences performed between the two pitch types, (Z = −0.431, p = 0.67). The median number of KSs performed by each group was 2.5. The most frequently used Kinematic Sequences for both pitch types were due to alteration in the sequence of the distal segments. The total percentage of Kinematic Sequences with altered distal segment sequencing for the curveball pitches was 49% and 43% for fastball pitches. Identifying the frequency of Kinematic Sequences with altered timing of hand and forearm peak velocities across pitch types may lead to a better understanding of the stresses that individual pitchers incur.