Ecological Validity of Prolonged Sitting Studies: How Well Do They Represent Real-Life Sedentary Patterns? A Pilot Study

The effect of cardiorespiratory fitness and habitual physical activity on cardiovascular responses to 2 h of uninterrupted sitting

Prolonged uninterrupted sitting of >3 h has been shown to acutely cause central and peripheral cardiovascular dysfunction. However, individuals rarely sit uninterrupted for >2 h, and the cardiovascular response to this time is currently unknown. In addition, while increased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and habitual physical activity (HPA) are independently associated with improvements in central and peripheral cardiovascular function, it remains unclear whether they influence the response to uninterrupted sitting. This study sought to 1) determine whether 2 h of uninterrupted sitting acutely impairs carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), femoral ankle PWV (faPWV), and central and peripheral blood pressure and 2) investigate the associations between CRF and HPA versus PWV changes during uninterrupted sitting. Following 2 h of uninterrupted sitting, faPWV significantly increased [mean difference (MD) = 0.26 m·s-1, standard error (SE) = 0.10, P = 0.013] as did diastolic blood pressure (MD = 2.83 mmHg, SE = 1.08, P = 0.014), however, cfPWV did not significantly change. Although our study shows 2 h of uninterrupted sitting significantly impairs faPWV, neither CRF (r = 0.105, P = 0.595) nor HPA (r = -0.228, P = 0.253) was associated with the increases.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that neither cardiorespiratory fitness nor habitual physical activity influence central and peripheral cardiovascular responses to a 2-h bout of uninterrupted sitting in healthy young adults.

Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease risk: An evolutionary perspective

A ubiquitous aspect of contemporary societies is sedentary behavior (SB), defined as low intensity activities in a seated, reclined, or supine posture. Leading public health agencies, including the World Health Organization, have recognized the strong association between SB and poor health outcomes, particularly cardiovascular disease. However, while public health agencies have begun to advocate for “reductions” in SB, the current US guidelines are typically vague and non-specific. There is good reasoning behind this non-committal advocacy—there is limited mechanistic and clinical evidence to support policy development. To guide SB policy development, it is important to first consider the origins and evolution of SB, including the following: 1) is SB really a novel/contemporary behavior? i.e., how has this behavior evolved? 2) how did our ancestors sit and in what contexts? 3) how does SB interact with 24-hour activity behaviors, including physical activity and sleep? 4) what other historical and contemporary facets of life interact with SB? and 5) in what context do these behaviors occur and how might they provide different evolutionarily novel stressors? This perspective article will synthesize the available evidence that addresses these questions and stimulate discussion pertaining to the lessons that we can learn from an historical and evolutionary perspective. Last, it will outline the gaps in current SB interruption literature that are hindering development of feasible SB reduction policy.

What is the impact of aerobic fitness and movement interventions on low-flow-mediated vasoconstriction? A systematic review of observational and intervention studies

The cardiovascular benefits of physical exercise are well established. The vasoreactivity that occurs during reductions in local arterial blood flow, termed low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC), is a measure of endothelial-dependent vasoconstrictor function. It is unclear whether aerobic fitness and movement (or lack thereof) influences L-FMC. We systematically reviewed studies examining the impact of physical behaviours on L-FMC. To be included, cross-sectional and interventional studies had to examine the impact of a physical behaviour on L-FMC in adults. There were no language or date of publication restrictions. Sources were searched in May, 2021 and included Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools were used. Fourteen studies (15 arms; 313 participants; 398 total observations from four arteries) met the inclusion criteria. The study quality varied from four out of 14 (controlled intervention scoring) to nine out of 12 (longitudinal intervention with no control group scoring) with the total points dependent upon the study design. Conflicting results were reported for acute prolonged sitting studies (attenuated L-FMC: n = 1; no change: n = 1) and resistance exercise (increased L-FMC: n = 2; no change: n = 2). Most observational studies examining aerobic fitness (3/4 studies) and aerobic exercise interventions (4/5 studies) observed a favourable effect on L-FMC. Overall, the included studies support that higher aerobic fitness and engaging in aerobic exercise training may augment L-FMC responses. Our systematic review highlights the heterogeneity between studies and identifies current gaps and future directions to better our understanding of (in)activity, exercise, and posture on endothelial vasoconstrictor function. PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021248241.