Deteriorative Effect of Smoking on Target Lesion Revascularization After Implantation of Coronary Stents With Diameter of 3.0 mm or Less

Impact of smoking status on cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Many military veterans in the United States with coronary artery disease continue to smoke despite undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies have described improved cardiovascular outcomes in smokers, the so-called "smokers' paradox." In this study, we examined the effects of smoking on cardiovascular outcomes following PCI.

HYPOTHESIS

Do patients who smoke have different post-PCI outcomes than nonsmokers?

METHODS

All patients who underwent PCI at a single US Veterans Administration hospital from 2004 to 2009 were followed. Outcomes of interest included myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary intervention, unplanned cardiac hospitalization, death, and a composite of events for 6 months after PCI. Changes in traditional risk factors were also assessed.

RESULTS

Unadjusted analysis revealed that in almost all categories, smokers had lower incidence of adverse events than nonsmokers. However, after adjusting for the older age of the nonsmokers, no favorable statistical trend toward smokers was seen. Significant improvement in blood pressure and lipid levels were seen in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for differences in age, there did not appear to be any protective effect of smoking on cardiovascular outcomes following PCI. Smokers achieved similar degrees of risk factor optimization during the follow-up period as their nonsmoker counterparts. Aggressive efforts to decrease the prevalence of smoking must be maintained.

Smoking status on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The effect of smoking on prognosis among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is controversial, and data on the importance of smoking cessation or reductions were lacking.

HYPOTHESIS

Smoking cessation or reductions could reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in patient after PCI.

METHODS

There were 19 506 consecutive patients who had undergone successful PCI between April 2004 and January 2010 followed. Extensive data, including self-reported smoking habits, were obtained at baseline and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared with post-PCI quitters and persistent smokers, the nonsmokers and pre-PCI quitters were older and had a higher prevalence of comorbid factors such as hypertension and impaired left ventricle function. The adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.92-3.30) for nonsmokers, 0.52 (95% CI: 0.32-0.84) for pre-PCI quitters, and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06-0.22) for post-PCI quitters, compared to persistent smokers. With respect to additional revascularizations, a higher risk was observed among the quitters (1.70 [95% CI: 1.40-2.08] for pre-PCI quitters and 1.59 [95% CI: 1.36-1.85] for post-PCI quitters) as well as the nonsmokers (1.40 [95% CI: 1.20-1.64]). Among persistent smokers, each reduction of 5 cigarettes/day was associated with a 72% decline in mortality risk (P < 0.001) but did not reach statistical significant for repeated revascularizations (0.80 [95% CI: 0.46-1.37], P = 0.4132).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher risk of revascularization, the cessation of smoking either before or after PCI is beneficial in all-cause mortality. The apparent smoker's paradox may be explained by the differences in baseline risk or the reduced sensitivity to adverse outcomes as well as the reluctance to seek medical help among smokers.

Impact of smoking on the outcome of patients treated with drug-eluting stents: 1-year results from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE)

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking strongly increases morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes, but the relevance of smoking in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown.

AIMS

To assess the impact of smoking on the presentation and outcome of patients treated with DES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed data from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE) and identified 1,122 patients who had never smoked and 1,052 patients who were current smokers. Smokers were younger (56.5 vs. 69.4 years, p < 0.0001), more often males, with less frequent diabetes and hypertension compared to non-smokers. Smokers presented more often with acute coronary syndromes. After a mean follow-up of 12.5 months, smokers had both higher mortality (4.6 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05) and myocardial infarction (MI) rates (4.9 vs. 3%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers in the rate of target vessel revascularization (9.8 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.26). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (defined as the composite of death, MI and stroke, MACCE) were higher in smokers (10.6 vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). Moreover, after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic variables, smoking continued to be a strong independent predictor for MACCE (OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.49-3.68). In a subgroup analysis, we found that the increased risk of smoking was most prominent in patients presenting with stable angina pectoris (OR = 3.71, 95% CI 1.24-2.57, p < 0.05). Smoking almost doubled the risk for MACCE in acute MI patients, though this did not reach statistical significance (adjusted OR = 1.91, 95% CI 0.93-3.94, p = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

This large multicentre DES registry provides evidence that smokers treated with DES, despite lower incidence of predisposing risk factors for atherosclerosis, experience higher rates of death and MI compared to non-smokers, particularly in the setting of stable coronary artery disease. Smoking has only marginal effects on target vessel revascularization rates in patients treated with DES.

Clinical and angiographic features of small vessel stenting in the drug-eluting stent era

HYPOTHESIS

This study was designed to investigate the clinical and angiographic features and procedural outcomes of small-vessel stenting in a real-world experience during the transition era between drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS).

METHODS

Using one of the largest single-institutional cohorts, this study evaluated all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2002 through 2005. Analysis was restricted to patients receiving a single stent or undergoing balloon-only angioplasty in a single anatomic site. Small-vessel stents (SVS) were defined as 2.00 to 2.75 mm and large-vessel stents (LVS) as 3.00 to 4.00 mm in diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 19,580 stents were placed in 10,396 patients. Of 6208 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, 1630 (26.3%) received SVS, and 4578 (73.7%) received LVS. The SVS group had more female (35.5% vs 26.3%, P < .001) and diabetic patients (27.9% vs 24.2%, P < .003) than the LVS group. Compared with LVS, SVS lesions were shorter (14.5 +/- 5.8 mm vs 15.7 +/- 6.4 mm, P < .0001) and more complex (66% vs 53% class B2/C lesions, P = .041). Indicators of procedural difficulty, including greater contrast volume, number of devices, total inflation time, and fluoroscopy time, were more commonly observed in the SVS group. After adjustment for confounding factors, the incidence of small treatment vessel diameter was significantly higher among the DES vs the BMS group (odds ratio [OR]: = 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-2.36).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to identifying distinct patient, lesion, and procedural performance characteristics, our study, one of the largest single-center experiences in small-vessel PCI, suggests that the availability of DES substantially increased the use of SVS, as opposed to balloon-only angioplasty, in this anatomically challenging setting.

Cigarette-Smoke-Induced Vasoconstriction of Peripheral Arteries Evaluation by Synchrotron Radiation Microangiography

BACKGROUND

Although cigarette smoking is thought to constrict peripheral vessels, details have not been clarified because of the limitation of spatial resolution in conventional X-ray angiography systems. Synchrotron radiation microangiography can identify small arteries down to 50 microm in diameter.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Male Wistar rats (n=9) were made to smoke a cigarette using the modified Griffith snout exposure system. Angiography of the rat hind limb was performed before, during, and 15 min after smoking. Arteries were classified into 3 groups based on the pre-smoking diameter: Group S: <100 microm, Group M 100-200 microm, Group L: >200 microm). In Groups M and L, arteries were constricted with smoking (mean diameter 140-106 microm; p<0.001, 260-162 microm; p<0.00001, respectively), whereas no constriction was noted in Group S (82-83 microm). Constricted arteries in Groups M and L returned to pre-smoking levels at 15 min after cessation of smoking.

CONCLUSION

The acute changes brought about by cigarette smoking in rat peripheral arteries could be identified by synchrotron radiation microangiography. Cigarette smoking exclusively constricted arteries greater than 100 mum in diameter, which means there is vessel-size dependency of the impairment.

Effectiveness of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (Cypher ) for Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis Inside a Bare Metal Stent

We estimated the benefit of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES, Cypher) for diffuse (> 10 mm) in-stent restenosis (ISR) inside bare metal stents (BMS) because the feasibility of the SES was not confirmed after its recent approval in Japan. Clinical and angiographic outcomes after SES implantation to 93 diffuse ISR were compared with those of 3 groups treated by plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA, (n = 54)), cutting balloon angioplasty (CB, (n = 24)), and BMS (n = 41) in a series of 153 patients whose follow-up quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) evaluated 3-9 months after the treatments was obtained from January 2003 through December 2005. For 33 lesions in the SES group, 12-month follow-up QCA results were obtained and compared with those at 6 months. Ticlopidine (200 mg/day) was prescribed for at least 12 weeks after SES implantation and for 2 weeks after BMS in addition to aspirin (81-100 mg/day). Patient characteristics and the characteristics of previous implanted BMS in the SES group were not significantly different from those in the other groups. Death from cardiac causes and nonfatal myocardial infarction did not occur in any group. Stent thrombosis was not observed in the BMS and SES groups. The incidence of repeat target lesion revascularization (re-TLR) in the SES group (3.23%) was significantly lower compared with that of the POBA (37.0%), CB (25.0%), and BMS (29.3%) groups (P < 0.001, respectively). Late loss in the SES group (0.44 +/- 0.41 mm) was significantly smaller than that in the BMS group (1.34 +/- 0.74 mm) (P < 0.05). The rate of recurrent ISR (re-ISR) in SES (5.38%) was significantly lower than that in POBA (46.3%), CB (41.7%), and BMS (46.3%) (P < 0.001, respectively). The QCA variables at 6 months in the SES group were not significantly different from those at 12 months. Thus, SES implantation for diffuse ISR was far superior since it markedly reduced the incidence of re-TLR with re-ISR at up to 6-months follow-up. In addition, this angiographic patency after SES implantation continued until 12 months.