Myocardial protective effects of nicorandil during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina

Effect of Perioperative Nicorandil on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Retrospective Study

Background

The potential myocardial protective effect of nicorandil (NICD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention has been established. However, its efficacy in the context of cardiac surgery remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the myocardial protective effect of perioperative NICD use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods

We retrospectively gathered data from patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery between 12/2018 and 04/2021 in Fuwai Hospital. Subsequently, the patients were divided into two groups, NICD group and non-nicorandil (non-NICD) group. A 1, 3 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of myocardial injury. The secondary outcomes included the mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, duration of chest drainage, the drainage volume, the total cost, the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the incidence of acute liver injury (ALI). Subsequently, we divided the entire population into two distinct subgroups based on their administration of NICD, and performed a comprehensive subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 2406 patients were ultimately included in the study. After PSM, 250 patients in NICD group and 750 patients in non-NICD group were included in the analysis. Perioperative NICD reduced the incidence of myocardial injury (47.2% versus 38.8%, P=0.025). Our subgroup analysis revealed that preoperative NICD administration not only provided myocardial protection benefits (45.7% vs 35.8%, OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.45-0.97], P=0.041), but also demonstrated statistically significant reduction in ALI, the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The perioperative NICD administration may confer myocardial protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Furthermore, the preoperative utilization of NICD has the potential to mitigate the incidence of postoperative ALI, a reduction in the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage.

Cardioprotective and Antianginal Efficacy of Nicorandil: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT

Angina pectoris remains a significant burden despite advances in medical therapy and coronary revascularization. Many patients (up to 30%) with angina have normal coronary arteries, with coronary microvascular disease and/or coronary artery vasospasm being major drivers of the myocardial demand-supply mismatch. Even among patients revascularized for symptomatic epicardial coronary stenosis, recurrent angina remains highly prevalent. Medical therapy for angina currently centers around 2 disparate goals, viz secondary prevention of hard clinical outcomes and symptom control. Vasodilators, such as nitrates, have been first-line antianginal agents for decades, along with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers. However, efficacy in symptoms control is heterogenous, depending on underlying mechanism(s) of angina in an individual patient, often necessitating multiple agents. Nicorandil (NCO) is an antianginal agent first discovered in the late 1970s with a uniquely dual mechanism of action. Like a typical nitrate, it mediates medium-large vessel vasodilation through nitric oxide. In addition, NCO has adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent potassium channel agonist activity (K ATP ), mediating microvascular dilatation. Hence, it has proven effective in both coronary artery vasospasm and coronary microvascular disease, typically challenging patient populations. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that cardiomyocyte protection against ischemia through ischemic preconditioning may be mediated through K ATP agonism. Finally, there is now fairly firm evidence in favor of NCO in terms of hard event reduction among patients with stable coronary artery disease, following myocardial infarction, and perhaps even among patients with congestive heart failure. This review aims to summarize the mechanism of action of NCO, its efficacy as an antianginal, and current evidence behind its impact on hard outcomes. Finally, we review other cardiac and emerging noncardiac indications for NCO use.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nicorandil for periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing PCI through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods

We analyzed the clinical data of patients including the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) from selected articles. RCTs were retrieved from medical literature databases. RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the endpoints.

Results

In total, 15 articles (16 trial comparisons) were retrieved which contained 2221 patients. In general, 1130 patients (50.9%) were randomized to the experimental group, whereas 1091 patients (49.1%) were randomized to the control group. The result showed that nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI and MACE after PCI compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Overall, early use of nicorandil in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with a significant reduction of PMI and MACE.

Nicorandil for Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials

The clinical outcomes of nicorandil in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are conflicting. We sought to evaluate the effects of nicorandil on periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) in elective PCI. Eligible studies that reported the effect of nicorandil on PMI in elective PCI were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (up to October 28, 2019). The outcomes were PMI and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Ten randomized controlled trials with 1304 patients undergoing elective PCI were evaluated. Nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; P = .0003); however, there was no significant difference in MACCEs (OR = 0.80; P = .45) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses showed that nicorandil significantly lowered the PMI risk when only patients with stable coronary artery disease (OR = 0.41; P = .0008) were considered and when nicorandil was administered intravenously (OR = 0.41; P = .0007) or orally (OR = 0.33; P = .0001). This meta-analysis suggests that nicorandil could reduce the incidence of PMI without increasing the occurrence of MACCEs in elective PCI. The effect of nicorandil in lowering the PMI risk is associated with the diagnosis of the patients and the route of nicorandil administration.

Effects of nicorandil infusion on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris and percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is effective in treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but is associated with some serious complications. Nicorandil is an anti‐anginal agent acting to improve microvascular circulation and to increase coronary blood flow. The objective of this article is to evaluate the effects of intracoronary injection followed with continuous intravenous injection of nicorandil on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UA) undergoing PCI.

Methods

A single‐center, self‐controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between January 2019 and April 2019. Sixty‐three consecutive patients with UA who received coronary angiography and selective PCI were enrolled. ECG was recorded and analyzed before and 24 hr after nicorandil infusion.

Results

Patients were divided into three groups: control group (n = 23, aged 63.43 ± 12.55 years), short‐term, and prolonged use with nicorandil group (n = 20 and 20, aged 66.45 ± 8.06 years and 65.80 ± 9.49 years, respectively). Clinical characteristics and ECG parameters were similar before PCI among three groups (p > .05). In nicorandil treatment groups, intervals of QTd and Tp‐e in patients post‐PCI were significantly shorter than that in control and pre‐PCI (p < .05).

Conclusions

Nicorandil infusion reduces QTd and Tp‐e interval in patients with UA. Further studies will be needed to determine whether these electrophysiological changes are associated with a reduction of ventricular arrhythmias and improved outcomes.

Nicorandil effects on platelet function, Hs-CRP, MMP-9 and myocardial antioxidation in patients with unstable angina

Nicorandil effects on platelet activation and myocardial antioxidant function in patients with unstable angina were studied. A total of 157 patients with unstable angina in the First People's Hospital of Foshan were selected and divided into experimental and control group. Patients in experimental group were treated with conventional drugs and nicorandil (15 min/day), t.i.d., for 21 days as one course of treatment, while those in control group were treated with conventional drugs. After treatment, serum indexes were detected and compared between the two groups of patients. Compared with that in control group, the platelet function of patients in the experimental group was significantly improved, and there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Serum anti-oxidation factors in both groups were increased after treatment, and they were increased more significantly in experimental group (P<0.05). Serum inflammatory factors, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and matrix metalloproteinase-9, also declined significantly in the experimental group. Nicorandil reduces inflammatory response and promotes stability of myocardial function in the treatment of unstable angina.

Meta-analysis of Nicorandil effectiveness on myocardial protection after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Using the current meta-analysis as well as systematic review, to determine the curative effect of Nicorandil in comparison of no Nicorandil after elective percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) on patients.

METHODS

Published literatures were identified via a computerized literature search of CENTRAL, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase Databases of Systematic Reviews. A set of randomized trials evaluating Nicorandil in comparison of no Nicorandil administered following PCI in patients harboring coronary artery disease were included. Outcomes were revealed based on the following parameters: peak creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) value, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), peak troponin I (cTnI), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) per randomized patients.

RESULTS

We included a total of 14 RCTs involving 1864 subjects in the present review. According to this meta-analysis, LVEF was significantly improved in Nicorandil group; the peak CK-MB level and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events were remarkably lower in Nicorandil group. Nicorandil and no Nicorandil administered group appeared to be equivalent with regards to cTnI.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicorandil is effective for patients undergoing elective PCI with coronary artery disease in terms of reducing the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events as well as improving heart function. Nicorandil may exert potential role as a valid and adjunctive therapy accompanied with PCI.

Efficacy and safety of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the PENMIPCI trial

Background

Previous studies have indicated that nicorandil can reduce perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ePCI), but this conclusion is still controversial. Additionally, studies reporting on the safety of nicorandil are lacking. Therefore, we performed this prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nicorandil on PMI in patients undergoing ePCI.

Methods

One hundred and forty-six patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) scheduled to undergo ePCI were randomly assigned to the nicorandil group (n=74) or control group (n=72). The primary outcomes were the change in cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) at 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, new heart failure or coronary revascularization.

Results

There was no difference in age (54.76±5.93 vs 56.35±5.22) between the nicorandil group and the control group. In addition, no differences were observed in the cTnT and CK-MB levels between the two groups at admission (all P⩾0.05). Compared with those in the control group, the cTnT (0.15±0.12 vs 0.12±0.10 at 12 hours and 0.17±0.12 vs 0.13±0.10 at 24 hours) and CK-MB (15.35±8.23 vs 12.31±7.93 at 12 hours and 13.63±8.87 vs 11.13±5.71 at 24 hours) levels in the nicorandil group were significantly decreased after surgery (all P⩽0.05). Furthermore, nicorandil did not increase the incidence of MACE in the nicorandil group compared with the control group (12.16% vs 12.50%).

Conclusions

Nicorandil can reduce PMI in patients undergoing ePCI and does not increase the incidence of MACE.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-17012056.

Effect of nicorandil on QT dispersion in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective angioplasty: A triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Background

Nicorandil leads to the relaxation of fine vascular smooth muscle, and thus causes vasodilatation of major epicardial. Also, it has anti-arrhythmic and cardio-protective effects by improving reperfusion, and ultimately leads to a reduction in microvascular damage caused by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of nicorandil on QT interval dispersion (QTd) in patients with stable angina pectoris during elective angioplasty.

Methods

This triple-blind and randomized clinical trial was performed on patients with stable angina pectoris, candidates for elective angiography referred to Imam Reza and Ghaem hospitals in Mashhad, Iran, between January and October 2016. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving nicorandil (60 mg as 20 mg before and 40 mg after PCI) and placebo. All the patients underwent electrocardiography 12 hours before and 12 hours after PCI. The values of maximal corrected QT interval (QTc max) and QTd in these intervals, and the levels of changes in the QTd (QTd difference before angiography and after PCI) were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed statistically using SPSS version 18 software via Chi-square and Independent-samples t-test.

Results

This study was performed on 90 patients (55 males and 35 females) with a mean age of 58.6±10.8 years, on two groups of 45 people. The two groups were matched for age, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors and baseline testing. The QTd before angiography had no statistically significant difference between the patients of both groups (control: 77.7±17.1 vs. nicorandil: 80.7±14.2 ms; p=0.371). The QTd after PCI in the nicorandil group was lower than the control group (48.1±14.2 vs. 59.2±15.6 ms; p=0.000). The decrease rate in QTd had a statistically significant difference between the two groups (control: 18.9±11.0 vs. nicorandil: 33.5±9.5 ms; p=0.000).

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that oral administration of nicorandil around the PCI could further reduce QTd following PCI, compared to the control group.

Trial registration

The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir) with the Irct ID: IRCT2016120631159N1

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Cardioprotective Effects of Nicorandil on Coronary Heart Disease Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Nicorandil is a nicotinamide ester commonly prescribed for treatment of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). In the present study, we aimed to explore the cardioprotective effects of nicorandil on CHD patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Material/Methods

One hundred patients with CHD undergoing PCI were randomly divided into a control group (n=48) and a nicorandil group (n=52). Patients in the control group received traditional therapy, and while patients in the nicorandil group received nicorandil before PCI in addition to the traditional therapy. After PCI, all patients underwent coronary angiogram, and TIMI frame count (TFC) was calculated. Plasma levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were determined before and at 6, 18, and 24 h after PCI. Moreover, systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) were recorded before and 3 months after PCI.

Results

There was a significant difference in the rate of no-reflow (P=0.036) between the 2 groups. The blood frames and levels of cTnI, CK-MB, MPO, and MDA in the nicorandil group were significantly decreased compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Moreover, administration of nicorandil markedly decreased SBP, MBP, and HR, but obviously increased LVEF at 3 months after PCI (P<0.05 or P<0.01).

Conclusions

Nicorandil exerts cardioprotective effects on CHD patients undergoing elective PCI by decreasing PCI-related myocardial injury and rate of no-reflow and improvement of LVEF.

The clinical effect of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Many scholars have studied the effect of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but results are inconsistent. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis. Finally, 16 articles, including 1616 patients, were included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that: (1) Nicorandil can reduce the level of CK-MB after PCI, including at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours. (2) Nicorandil can reduce the level of TnT after PCI, including at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours. (3) Nicorandil can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions after PCI. (4) Nicorandil cannot reduce the level of MVP after PCI, including at 12 hours and 24 hours. (5) Subgroup analysis showed that nicorandil can reduce CK-MB and TnT level at 24 hours after PCI for Chinese's population (P < 0.05), but can not reduce CK-MB and TnT level at 24 hours after PCI for non Chinese's population (P > 0.05). Our meta-analysis indicate that nicorandil can reduce myocardial injury and reduce the incidence of adverse reaction caused by PCI for Chinese's population, but is not obvious for non Chinese's population. However, this conclusion still needs to be confirmed in the future.

Nicorandil protects mesenchymal stem cells against hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis

Nicorandil, an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channel opener, has been shown to exert a significant protective effect against ischemic heart injury. In the present study, we investigated the anti-apoptotic effects of nicorandil on rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) subjected to hypoxia and serum deprivation (H/SD), as well as the potential underlying mechanisms. Apoptosis was induced in the MSCs by exposure to H/SD, and the apoptotic rates and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were determined by flow cytometry. The mitochondrial inner membrane potential was measured using the membrane-permeable dye, JC-1. Western blot analysis was used to measure the levels of Akt, Bcl-2, Bax, cytochrome c and cleaved caspase-3. The cell proliferative ability was assessed using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. The results revealed that H/SD-induced apoptosis was significantly attenuated by treatment with nicorandil in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, nicorandil markedly reduced the levels of ROS which were induced by exposure to H/SD, and increased the stability of mitochondrial membrane potential and the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, while it concomitantly decreased the H/SD-induced cleavage of caspase-3 and the release of cytochrome c. Treatment with the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, LY294002, abolished the beneficial effects of nicorandil on the MSCs. In conclusion, the findings of the present study indicate that nicorandil exerts protective effects against MSC apoptosis induced by H/SD and that these effects are mediated through the PI3K/Akt, mitochondrial and ROS signaling pathways.

Cardioprotective effects of oral nicorandil use in diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the cardioprotective role of oral nicorandil (a hybrid between the nitrates and adenosine triphosphate [ATP] sensitive potassium channel activators) in diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury commonly occurs during PCI. Several agents that mimic ischemic preconditioning could help minimize this phenomenon.

METHODS

One hundred diabetic patients with stable angina were prospectively enrolled, then randomly assigned to receive oral nicorandil: 20 mg once daily (group A, 50 patients) or placebo (group B, 50 patients) 1 week before and 6 months after PCI. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels were measured before and 6, 12, and 24 hours post-PCI.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study cohort was 59.8 ± 5.8 years (males = 68%). cTnI level was significantly lower in group A (6 hours: 7.3 ± 0.3 vs. 14.5 ± 0.4 pg/mL; 12 hours: 12.7 ± 0.7 vs. 25.3 ± 0.5 pg/mL; and 24 hours: 7.7 ± 0.5 vs. 15.0 ± 0.4 pg/mL, P < 0.001). After 6 months, the same group showed significantly higher left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF%), that is, 63.5 ± 7.7% versus 56.5 ± 8.3% (P < 0.05), with a trend toward lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

CONCLUSION

In diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI, nicorandil intake was associated with decreased incidence of PCI-related myocardial injury and improvement of LVEF% after 6 months.

All-cause mortality and cardiovascular events with nicorandil in patients with IHD: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Nicorandil is able to protect the cardiomyocytes from ischemic damage, but clear benefits of nicorandil in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events were not consistently reported in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

MATERIALS AND RESULTS

Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI and Wangfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Data on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events were collected. Nicorandil groups were pooled to perform a comparison with control groups and to get the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, relative risks (RRs), and associated 95% CIs for cardiovascular events. STATA 11.0 software was used for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events statistics. We retrieved 17 randomized controlled studies enrolling a total of 7305 patients. The addition of nicorandil treatment significantly reduced cardiovascular events (13.83% versus 18.01%; RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.86). No differences in all-cause mortality (3.83% versus 4.70%; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.02), and repeat revascularization rate (13.06% versus 13.54%; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.29) were observed. There was a weak linear association between cardiovascular events and nicorandil in IHD with diabetes (P=0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that nicorandil as an adjunct therapy to IHD is associated with reduced cardiovascular events in patients with IHD.

Cardioprotective effects of single oral dose of nicorandil before selective percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective:

Nicorandil, an opener of ATP-sensitive K+ channels, was used to treat angina in patients with coronary artery disease. In this study, we aim to investigate the cardioprotective effects of single oral dose of nicorandil in patients undergoing selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods:

One hundred and thirty-eight patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI from July 2011 to October 2012 were randomly divided into control group (group 1, n=47), 10 mg oral nicorandil group (group 2, n=45), and 20 mg oral nicorandil group (group 3, n=46) about 2 hours before procedure, respectively. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were determined at 20 ~ 24 hours after PCI.

Results:

There was a significant difference in the rate of any cTnI elevation among the three groups (group 1: 36.17%, group 2: 20.00%, group 3: 15.22%, p=0.0176). With respect to the frequency of cTnI elevation ≥3 and 5×the upper limit of normal (ULN), there also had statistical difference among the three groups (17.02% in group 1, 8.89% in group 2, and 4.35% in group 3, respectively for cTnI elevation ≥3× ULN, p=0.0428; 12.77% in group 1, 6.67% in group 2, and 2.17% in group 3, respectively, for cTnI elevation ≥5× ULN, p=0.0487). Logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF (OR=0.915, 95% CI=0.853-0.981) and the use of nicorandil (OR=0.516, 95% CI=0.267-0.996) before PCI were independent protective factors of myocardial injury.

Conclusion:

Single oral dose of nicorandil (10 mg, 20 mg) 2 hours before the PCI procedure could decrease the incidence of peri-procedure myocardial injury and PCI-related myocardial infarction.

The effect of nicorandil on small intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in a canine model

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that nicorandil, which has both ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel opener-like and nitrate-like properties, has an organ-protective effect in ischemia-reperfusion injury in several experimental animal models.

AIMS

We evaluate the effectiveness of nicorandil on warm ischemia-reperfusion injury of the small intestine in a canine model.

METHODS

Eighteen beagle dogs were divided into three groups: the control group (n=6); the nicorandil group (n=6), to which nicorandil was injected intravenously before the ischemia; and the glibenclamide group (n=6), to which glibenclamide, which closes the KATP channel and does not suppress the nitrate effect of nicorandil, was orally administered, and then nicorandil was injected in the same manner as in the nicorandil group. Both the superior mesenteric artery and vein were clamped for 2 h. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow, small intestinal mucosal tissue blood flow, intramucosal pH, and histopathological analyses were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Superior mesenteric artery blood flow, mucosal tissue blood flow and pHi after reperfusion were significantly maintained in the nicorandil in comparison with the control and the glibenclamide groups. The histopathological findings showed less severe mucosal damage after reperfusion in the nicorandil group compared with the other two groups. Between the control group and the glibenclamide group, no significant differences were observed in all those parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that nicorandil has a protective effect on small intestinal IR injury, and activation of KATP channels plays an important role in inhibiting small intestinal IR injury.

Nicorandil improves post-ischemic myocardial dysfunction in association with opening the mitochondrial K(ATP) channels and decreasing hydroxyl radicals in isolated rat hearts

BACKGROUND

Nicorandil has been reported to induce cardioprotection by opening the mitochondrial K(ATP) channels. However, whether nicorandil affects reactive oxygen species is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The hearts of male Sprague-Dawley rats were excised and perfused on a Langendorff apparatus with Krebs-Henseleit solution with a gas mixture of 95% O(2) and 5% CO(2). 1 mmol/L of nicorandil was given 10 min before ischemia. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP, mmHg), +/-dP/dt (mmHg/s) and coronary flow (ml/min) were continuously monitored. All hearts were perfused for a total of 120 min consisting of a 30 min pre-ischemic period, followed by a 30 min global ischemia and 60 min reperfusion with and without 5-hydroxydecanoic acid sodium salt (5-HD), a mitochondrial K(ATP) channel blocker. The concentrations of 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,3-DHBA), an indicator of hydroxyl radicals, in the perfusate during reperfusion period were also measured. Nicorandil significantly improved LVDP and +/-dP/dt, and increased coronary flow during reperfusion. Pretreatment with 5-HD abolished the improvement of LVDP and +/-dP/dt, and the increase in coronary flow induced by nicorandil. Nicorandil significantly attenuated the concentrations of 2,3-DHBA during reperfusion, which were restored by 5-HD.

CONCLUSION

Nicorandil is protective against post-ischemic left ventricular dysfunction in association with opening the mitochondrial K(ATP) channels, decreasing hydroxyl radicals and increasing coronary flow in the isolated rat heart.

Double-Blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered Nicorandil in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris in China

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of nicorandil were evaluated in Chinese patients with stable angina pectoris (AP) in a double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After a 2-week washout period, 232 patients with stable AP were randomized to receive either nicorandil (5 mg tid; 115 patients) or isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN: 20 mg bid; 117 patients) for 2 weeks. Exercise capacity, number of weekly anginal attacks, nitroglycerin (NTG) consumption, and safety were evaluated. Nicorandil and ISMN significantly prolonged the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression in an exercise tolerance test. Both drugs improved the total exercise time and the time to onset of chest pain. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Nicorandil significantly decreased the number of anginal attacks and NTG consumption. ISMN decreased the number of anginal attacks significantly; however, there was no significance in NTG consumption, and the ratio of anginal attack reduction was at least 50% was significantly higher with nicorandil. Nicorandil was well tolerated and there was no safety profile difference compared with ISMN. Thus, nicorandil may have equivalent or better antianginal effect than ISMN.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicorandil is beneficial as treatment for AP.

Nicorandil administration shows cardioprotective effects in patients with poor TIMI and collateral flow as well as good flow after AMI

BACKGROUND

Nicorandil (NCR) has been reported to have cardioprotective effects in patients with AMI. And collateral flow and TIMI flow are also important determinants of final salvaged myocardium in patients with AMI. There is no evidence as to whether TIMI or collateral flow modifies the cardioprotective effects of NCR in patients with AMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 68 initial AMI patients without restenosis which was defined as 50% diameter reduction of the intervention site in the chronic period. On initial CAG, 41 patients with poor flow (collateral: Rentrop 0 or 1 and TIMI 0 or 1) were NCR/Non-NCR = 20/21. Twenty-seven patients with good flow (collateral: Rentrop 2 or 3 or TIMI 2 or 3) were NCR/Non-NCR = 13/14. NCR was administered intravenously (4 mg) via intracoronary injection (2 mg) or continuously (4 mg/h). 99mTc-tetrofosmin (TF) and 123I-BMIPP SPECT were performed in the subacute and chronic (6 Mo) periods. In 20 SPECT segments, summed defect scores (TDS) and regional wall motion (WMS: -1=dyskinesis -4 = normal) of AMI segments using TF-QGS were estimated. In poor flow patients, the following values for NCR patients were higher (p < 0.05) than for Non-NCR patients in the improvement degree of TDS (BMIPP) (NCR: 6.5 +/- 3.9 vs. Non-NCR: 4.0 +/- 3.4), the improvement degree of TDS (TF) (NCR: 5.7 +/- 4.6 vs. Non-NCR: 2.2 +/- 4.6), and delta WMS (NCR: 1.4 +/- 1.1 vs. Non-NCR: 0.9 +/- 1.0). In good flow patients, the following values for NCR patients were better (p < 0.05) than for Non-NCR patients in TDS (BMIPP) (subacute) (NCR: 9.9 +/- 5.2 vs. Non-NCR: 16.5 +/- 10.4) and (chronic) (NCR: 5.1 +/- 5.2 vs. Non-NCR: 12.4 +/- 8.5), WMS (subacute) (NCR: 1.7 +/- 1.3 vs. Non-NCR: 1.0 +/- 1.0), and WMS (chronic) (NCR: 3.0 +/- 1.5 vs. Non-NCR: 2.1 +/- 1.3).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the cardioprotective effects of nicorandil administration are observable in both AMI patients with poor collateral and TIMI flow and good flow before reperfusion therapy.

Cardiac troponins as biomarkers of drug- and toxin-induced cardiac toxicity and cardioprotection

Cardiac troponin T and I (cTnT, cTnI) are sensitive biochemical markers of myocardial cell necrosis and have been adopted as the gold standard tests for acute myocardial infarction. Subtle elevations in cTn above the detection limits of the currently available commercial assays confers poor prognosis. These markers are superior to classical enzyme markers of necrosis due to their cardiospecificity. The diagnosis of drug-induced cardiac toxicity using the classical enzymes is problematic due to the high elevations of these markers in skeletal muscle necrosis. cTnT and cTnI are now being adopted as sensitive biomarkers of drug-induced cardiac toxicity.