Epicardial Ablation With Cooled Tip Catheter Close to the Coronary Arteries is Effective and Safe in the Porcine Heart if the Ventricular Potential is Being Monitored in the Epicardium and Endocardium

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmia Originating From the Cardiac Crux or Inferior Septum

Background—

Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (VA) can arise from the epicardium near the posteroseptal region (cardiac crux). There are only 2 prior reports describing idiopathic VA from the cardiac crux. The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical and the electrocardiographic features of idiopathic crux VA.

Methods and Results—

Crux VA was identified in 18 patients undergoing catheter ablation. We divided patients into 2 groups, those with VA originating from the apical crux (n=9) and the basal crux (n=9). We described the clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics of crux VA as well as the ablation results. Furthermore, we compared clinical features of crux VA with other sites of idiopathic VA. Fifteen crux VA patients (83%) had sustained ventricular tachycardia and 3 patients required implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation because of syncope. All patients had a left superior axis and 16 patients had R>S wave in V2. In apical crux VA, all patients had a deep S wave in V6 and 8 patients (89%) had R>S wave in aVR. All apical crux patients underwent attempted ablation in the middle cardiac vein without success. In 4 of these patients, epicardial ablation with subxiphoid approach was performed successfully. All basal crux VA patients had either negative or isoelectric pattern in V1 and had R>S in V6. Patients had successful ablation within the middle cardiac vein.

Conclusions—

Apical versus basal crux VA is identified as a new category of idiopathic VA with distinctive electrocardiographic characteristics; ablation via the middle cardiac vein is effective for eliminating basal crux VA, whereas apical crux VA often requires a subxiphoid epicardial approach.

How to Learn Epicardial Intervention Techniques in Electrophysiology

This article outlines an approach to begin an epicardial ablation program in the electrophysiology laboratory. There are some logistical hurdles in getting this program up and running, so this is a good opportunity to review the indications, the risks that are inherent in the procedure, and the infrastructure necessary in the electrophysiology laboratory and institution to perform the procedure safely and effectively.