Cilostazol increases tissue blood flow in contracting rabbit gastrocnemius muscle

The impact of phosphodiesterase inhibition on neurobehavioral outcomes in preclinical models of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Study design

Systematic review.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors on neurobehavioral outcomes in preclinical models of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019150639). Searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact of PDE inhibitors on neurobehavioral outcomes in preclinical models of traumatic or non-traumatic SCI. Data were extracted from relevant studies, including sample characteristics, injury model, and neurobehavioral assessment and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE checklist.

Results

The search yielded a total of 1,679 studies, of which 22 met inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 11 to 144 animals. PDE inhibitors used include rolipram (n = 16), cilostazol (n = 4), roflumilast (n = 1), and PDE4-I (n = 1). The injury models used were traumatic SCI (n = 18), spinal cord ischemia (n = 3), and degenerative cervical myelopathy (n = 1). The most commonly assessed outcome measures were Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor score (n = 13), and grid walking (n = 7). Of the 22 papers that met the final inclusion criteria, 12 showed a significant improvement in neurobehavioral outcomes following the use of PDE inhibitors, four papers had mixed findings and six found PDE inhibitors to be ineffective in improving neurobehavioral recovery following an SCI. Notably, these findings were broadly consistent across different PDE inhibitors and spinal cord injury models.

Conclusion

In preclinical models of traumatic and non-traumatic SCI, the administration of PDE inhibitors appeared to be associated with statistically significant improvements in neurobehavioral outcomes in a majority of included studies. However, the evidence was inconsistent with a high risk of bias. This review provides a foundation to aid the interpretation of subsequent clinical trials of PDE inhibitors in spinal cord injury.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=150639, identifier: CRD42019150639.

Cilostazol increases adenosine plasma concentration in patients with acute coronary syndrome

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Cilostazol is a specific and strong inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE) type III which can suppress the platelet aggregation by increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels. The clinical benefit of cilostazol in ACS patients suggested that the drug may have non-platelet-directed properties. Some in vitro and animal studies also indicated that the 'pleiotropic' properties of cilostazol might be related to the interaction with adenosine metabolism. Adenosine is an important regulatory metabolite and an inhibitor of platelet activation. However, no human study has been conducted to determine whether cilostazol could increase the adenosine plasma concentration in vivo. As a result, this study aimed to investigate the impact of cilostazol on adenosine plasma concentration (APC) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

METHODS

We prospectively analysed 149 ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. The included patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (cilostazol group, n = 64) or absence (aspirin group, n = 85) of aspirin intolerance. The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), APC and cAMP concentration was measured. Patient characteristics, medications and 30-day clinical outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Patients receiving cilostazol had a significantly higher adenosine and cAMP plasma concentration than patients receiving aspirin (3.00 ± 0.67 vs 2.56 ± 0.74 mol/L, P < .001; 28.10 ± 14.74 vs 20.48 ± 11.35 pmol/mL, P = .0014). Cilostazol was associated with a higher inhibition rate of ADP induced platelet aggregation than aspirin (63.35 ± 26.71 vs 52.2 ± 28.35, P = .036). The plasma levels of adenosine and cAMP showed a positive correlation with ADP induced platelet aggregation.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Cilostazol increases adenosine concentration compared with aspirin. Its potent antiplatelet effect in ACS patients may be partly mediated by adenosine.

Adenosine-Related Mechanisms in Non-Adenosine Receptor Drugs

Many ligands directly target adenosine receptors (ARs). Here we review the effects of noncanonical AR drugs on adenosinergic signaling. Non-AR mechanisms include raising adenosine levels by inhibiting adenosine transport (e.g., ticagrelor, ethanol, and cannabidiol), affecting intracellular metabolic pathways (e.g., methotrexate, nicotinamide riboside, salicylate, and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside), or undetermined means (e.g., acupuncture). However, other compounds bind ARs in addition to their canonical ‘on-target’ activity (e.g., mefloquine). The strength of experimental support for an adenosine-related role in a drug’s effects varies widely. AR knockout mice are the ‘gold standard’ method for investigating an AR role, but few drugs have been tested on these mice. Given the interest in AR modulation for treatment of cancer, CNS, immune, metabolic, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal conditions, it is informative to consider AR and non-AR adenosinergic effects of approved drugs and conventional treatments.

The protective effect of cilostazol on transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in rats

OBJECTIVE

Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is commonly used in breast reconstruction. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effects of cilostazol on TRAM flap viability in a rat TRAM model.

METHODS

Twenty-four Wistar rats were used. They were divided into four groups. Rats in Group 1 were applied TRAM flap. In Group 2, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered to rats via oral gavage 3 hours before the flap surgery. After the flap surgery, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered via oral gavage twice a day for 7 days. In Group 3 before the flap surgery, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered via oral gavage twice a day for 7 days, and treatment continued for 7 more days after the flap surgery. In Group 4 before the flap surgery, cilostazol 30 mg/kg was administered via oral gavage twice a day for 7 days and treatment was discontinued after the flap surgery.

RESULT

The mean necrosis rate in Group 1 was 41.69%, in Group 2 it was 27.0%, in Group 3 it was 6.66%, and in Group 4 it was 11.2%. The necrosis rate in Group 1 was found to be statistically significantly higher than other groups (p < .01), the necrosis rate in Group 2 was found to be statistically significant higher than Groups 3 and 4 (p < .01), and the necrosis rate in Group 4 was found to be statistically significant higher than Group 3 (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Cilostazol treatment seemed to increase the viability of TRAM flap, especially when administered as adjuvant therapy.

Differential effect of phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitors on sympathetic hyperinnervation in healed rat infarcts

BACKGROUND

The effect of phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE-3) inhibitors on arrhythmia remains controversial, so the purpose of this study was to determine their differential effects on sympathetic hyperinnervation and the involved mechanisms in a rat model of myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After ligating the coronary artery, male Wistar rats were randomized to cilostazol or milrinone, chemically unrelated inhibitors of PDE-3, or vehicle for 4 weeks. The postinfarction period was associated with increased myocardial norepinephrine levels and oxidant release, as measured by myocardial superoxide level and dihydroethidine fluorescence staining. Infarcted rats in the milrinone- and cilostazol-treated groups had favorable ventricular remodeling with similar potency. Compared with milrinone, cilostazol significantly increased interstitial adenosine levels and reduced the production of myocardial cAMP and superoxide. Cilostazol significantly blunted sympathetic hyperinnervation, as assessed by immunofluorescent analysis of sympathetic innervation, and western blotting and real-time quantitative RT-PCR of nerve growth factor. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of cilostazol on nerve growth factor was reversed by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, a selective A1 receptor antagonist, and enhanced by tempol administration. In spite of similar arrhythmic vulnerability during programmed stimulation in both the vehicle-and cilostazol-treated groups, cilostazol did not have proarrhythmic effects compared with milrinone.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike milrinone, cilostazol has therapeutic neutrality in arrhythmias because of adenosine uptake inhibition, which antagonizes the PDE-3-induced increase of sympathetic reinnervation via mediation of an adenosine A1 receptor-mediated antioxidation. 

The protective effect of cilostazol on isolated rabbit femoral arteries under conditions of ischemia and reperfusion: the role of the nitric oxide pathway

OBJECTIVES

The clinical significance of ischemia/reperfusion of the lower extremities demands further investigation to enable the development of more effective therapeutic alternatives. This study investigated the changes in the vascular reactivity of the rabbit femoral artery and nitric oxide metabolites under partial ischemia/ reperfusion conditions following cilostazol administration.

METHODS

Ischemia was induced using infrarenal aortic clamping. The animals were randomly divided into seven groups: Control 90 minutes, Ischemia/Reperfusion 90/60 minutes, Control 120 minutes, Ischemia/Reperfusion 120/90 minutes, Cilostazol, Cilostazol before Ischemia/Reperfusion 120/90 minutes, and Ischemia 120 minutes/Cilostazol/ Reperfusion 90 minutes. Dose-response curves for sodium nitroprusside, acetylcholine, and the calcium ionophore A23187 were obtained in isolated femoral arteries. The levels of nitrites and nitrates in the plasma and skeletal muscle were determined using chemiluminescence.

RESULTS

Acetylcholine-and A23187-induced relaxation was reduced in the Ischemia/Reperfusion 120/90 group, and treatment with cilostazol partially prevented this ischemia/reperfusion-induced endothelium impairment. Only cilostazol treatment increased plasma levels of nitrites and nitrates. An elevation in the levels of nitrites and nitrates was observed in muscle tissues in the Ischemia/Reperfusion 120/90, Cilostazol/Ischemia/Reperfusion, and Ischemia/ Cilostazol/Reperfusion groups.

CONCLUSION

Hind limb ischemia/reperfusion yielded an impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation of the femoral artery. Furthermore, cilostazol administration prior to ischemia exerted a protective effect on endothelium-dependent vascular reactivity under ischemia/reperfusion conditions.

Phosphodiesterases as targets for intermittent claudication

Intermittent claudication (IC) is one of the most frequent forms of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is most commonly caused by arterial atherosclerosis. Its clinical manifestation includes fatigue, discomfort, or pain occurring in limb muscles due to exercise-induced ischemia, thus limiting the ability of IC patients to walk and exercise. In addition to lifestyle changes (diet, exercise, and smoking cessation), pharmacological treatments are needed. Pathologically, atherosclerotic lesions cause a mismatch in oxygen supply and metabolic demand in the leg muscles during walking/exercise. This subjects the muscles to repeated ischemia and reperfusion injury that can alter structure and oxidative metabolism, resulting in insufficient utilization of oxygen supply. Despite extensive research efforts, cilostazol and pentoxifylline are the only drugs indicated for relieving the symptoms of IC, with cilostazol demonstrating significant improvement in walking distance and quality of life in these patients. Originally developed as a PDE3 inhibitor, cilostazol was later found to have several other pharmacological actions, and its success has been attributed to its multifactorial actions on platelets, endothelium, smooth muscle, and lipid profiles. Using cilostazol as an example, we discuss the rationales and pitfalls of targeting PDEs in IC, and potential strategies for the development of new and more effective pharmacological treatments.