Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging-state of the art

In patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging combined with coronary CT angiography (CTA) has become a comprehensive diagnostic examination technique resulting in both anatomical and quantitative functional information on myocardial blood flow, and the presence and grading of stenosis. Recently, CTP imaging has been proven to have good diagnostic accuracy for detecting myocardial ischemia, comparable to stress magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography perfusion, while being superior to single photon emission computed tomography. Dynamic CTP accompanied by coronary CTA can serve as a gatekeeper for invasive workup, as it reduces unnecessary diagnostic invasive coronary angiography. Dynamic CTP also has good prognostic value for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events. In this article, we will provide an overview of dynamic CTP, including the basics of coronary blood flow physiology, applications and technical aspects including protocols, image acquisition and reconstruction, future perspectives, and scientific challenges. KEY POINTS: • Stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion combined with coronary CTA is a comprehensive diagnostic examination technique resulting in both anatomical and quantitative functional information. • Dynamic CTP imaging has good diagnostic accuracy for detecting myocardial ischemia comparable to stress MRI and PET perfusion. • Dynamic CTP accompanied by coronary CTA may serve as a gatekeeper for invasive workup and can guide treatment in obstructive coronary artery disease.

Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Single-center studies indicated a high diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVES

This prospective multicenter study determined the diagnostic performance of combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CTP for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

Seven centers enrolled 174 patients with suspected or known CAD who were clinically referred for ICA. CTA and dynamic CTP were performed using dual-source CT before ICA. FFR was done as part of ICA in the case of 26% to 90% coronary diameter stenosis. Hemodynamically significant stenosis was defined as FFR of <0.8 or >90% stenosis on ICA.

RESULTS

The study protocol was completed in 157 participants, and hemodynamically significant stenosis was detected in 76 of 157 patients (48%) and 112 of 442 vessels (25%). According to receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, adding dynamic CTP to CTA significantly increased the area under the curve from 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.72) to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.81; P = 0.011) on the patient level, with decreased sensitivity (93% vs 72%; P < 0.001), improved specificity (36% vs 75%; P < 0.001), and improved overall accuracy (64% vs 74%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective multicenter study on dynamic CTP, the combination of anatomic assessment with coronary CTA and functional evaluation with dynamic CTP allowed more accurate identification of hemodynamically significant CAD compared with CTA alone. However, the clinical significance of this approach needs to be further investigated, including its usefulness in improving prognosis. (Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Linked to Infarction and Fibrosis Explored With Dual-Source CT [AMPLIFiED]; UMIN000016353).

Clinical Validation of the Accuracy of Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification with Dual-Source CT Using 15O-Water PET

PURPOSE

To determine the fitting equation that can correct for the underestimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement by using dynamic CT perfusion (CTP) with dual-source CT (MBFCT), using MBF with oxygen 15-labeled water (15O-water) PET (MBFPET) as a reference, and to determine the accuracy of corrected MBFCT (MBFCT-corrected) compared with MBFPET in a separate set of participants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study (reference no. 2466), 34 participants (mean age, 70 years ± 8 [standard deviation]; 27 men) known or suspected to have coronary artery disease underwent dynamic stress CTP and stress 15O-water PET between January 2014 and December 2018. The participants were randomly assigned to either a pilot group (n = 17), to determine the fitting equation on the basis of the generalized Renkin-Crone model that can explain the relation between MBFCT and MBFPET, or to a validation group (n = 17), to validate MBFCT-corrected compared with MBFPET. The agreement between MBFCT-corrected and MBFPET was evaluated by intraclass correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In the pilot group, MBFCT was lower than MBFPET (1.24 mL/min/g ± 0.28 vs 2.51 mL/min/g ± 0.89, P < .001) at the segment level. The relationship between MBFCT and MBFCT-corrected was represented as MBFCT = MBFCT-corrected × {1-exp[-(0.11 × MBFCT-corrected + 1.54)/MBFCT-corrected]}. In the validation group, MBFCT-corrected was 2.66 mL/min/g ± 1.93, and MBFPET was 2.68 mL/min/g ± 1.87 at the vessel level. MBFCT-corrected showed an excellent agreement with MBFPET (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.96]). The measurement bias of MBFCT-corrected and MBFPET was -0.02 mL/min/g ± 0.74.

CONCLUSION

Underestimation of MBF by CT was successfully corrected with a correction method that was based on contrast kinetics in the myocardium.Keywords: CT, CT-Perfusion, PET, Cardiac, Heart Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia

Cardiac imaging has a pivotal role in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic heart disease. SPECT is most commonly used for clinical myocardial perfusion imaging, whereas PET is the clinical reference standard for the quantification of myocardial perfusion. MRI does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation, similar to echocardiography, which can be performed at the bedside. CT perfusion imaging is not frequently used but CT offers coronary angiography data, and invasive catheter-based methods can measure coronary flow and pressure. Technical improvements to the quantification of pathophysiological parameters of myocardial ischaemia can be achieved. Clinical consensus recommendations on the appropriateness of each technique were derived following a European quantitative cardiac imaging meeting and using a real-time Delphi process. SPECT using new detectors allows the quantification of myocardial blood flow and is now also suited to patients with a high BMI. PET is well suited to patients with multivessel disease to confirm or exclude balanced ischaemia. MRI allows the evaluation of patients with complex disease who would benefit from imaging of function and fibrosis in addition to perfusion. Echocardiography remains the preferred technique for assessing ischaemia in bedside situations, whereas CT has the greatest value for combined quantification of stenosis and characterization of atherosclerosis in relation to myocardial ischaemia. In patients with a high probability of needing invasive treatment, invasive coronary flow and pressure measurement is well suited to guide treatment decisions. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses as well as the future technological potential of each imaging modality.

Myocardial Coverage and Radiation Dose in Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Third-Generation Dual-Source CT

OBJECTIVE

Third-generation dual-source computed tomography (3rd-DSCT) allows dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging (dynamic CTP) with a 10.5-cm z-axis coverage. Although the increased radiation exposure associated with the 50% wider scan range compared to second-generation DSCT (2nd-DSCT) may be suppressed by using a tube voltage of 70 kV, it remains unclear whether image quality and the ability to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) can be maintained under these conditions. This study aimed to compare the image quality, estimated MBF, and radiation dose of dynamic CTP between 2nd-DSCT and 3rd-DSCT and to evaluate whether a 10.5-cm coverage is suitable for dynamic CTP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients who underwent dynamic CTP using 2nd-DSCT at 80 kV (n = 54) or 3rd-DSCT at 70 kV (n = 53). Image quality, estimated MBF, radiation dose, and coverage of left ventricular (LV) myocardium were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between 3rd-DSCT and 2nd-DSCT in contrast-to-noise ratio (37.4 ± 11.4 vs. 35.5 ± 11.2, p = 0.396). Effective radiation dose was lower with 3rd-DSCT (3.97 ± 0.92 mSv with a conversion factor of 0.017 mSv/mGy·cm) compared to 2nd-DSCT (5.49 ± 1.36 mSv, p < 0.001). Incomplete coverage was more frequent with 2nd-DSCT than with 3rd-DSCT (1.9% [1/53] vs. 56% [30/54], p < 0.001). In propensity score-matched cohorts, MBF was comparable between 3rd-DSCT and 2nd-DSCT in non-ischemic (146.2 ± 26.5 vs. 157.5 ± 34.9 mL/min/100 g, p = 0.137) as well as ischemic myocardium (92.7 ± 21.1 vs. 90.9 ± 29.7 mL/min/100 g, p = 0.876).

CONCLUSION

The radiation increase inherent to the widened z-axis coverage in 3rd-DSCT can be balanced by using a tube voltage of 70 kV without compromising image quality or MBF quantification. In dynamic CTP, a z-axis coverage of 10.5 cm is sufficient to achieve complete coverage of the LV myocardium in most patients.

[The Optimal Start Timing of Helical Scan for Coronary CT Angiography and CT Myocardial Perfusion Scan Using 64-MDCT]

PURPOSE

Ichihara et al. (Fujita Med J 2015; 1(1): 9-14) developed a method to simultaneously obtain both coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) using 64-multi detector CT (MDCT). An input-function (time enhancement curve, TEC) of the ascending aorta (Ao) and myocardial CT density are necessary to calculate absolute myocardial blood flow (ml/g/min) using a two-compartment model. Helical scan starting timing is important to capture the peak (P) of Ao time enhancement curve (TEC). The purpose is to search the optimal timing of starting helical scan to capture the P.

METHODS

We performed 14 CTPs using Definition AS+ (SIEMENS). A dynamic scan at the Ao level was started at 7 s after contrast injection and helical scan was started at various trigger on bolus tracking. Definition AS+ needs 2 s (other scanner may need 4 s) for changing from a dynamic to helical scan mode. We created TECs of pulmonary artery (PA) and Ao using the fifth function fitting. We measured the time from trigger point to the P (t200, t250, t300 and tCP).

RESULTS

Mean t200, t250, t300 and tCP were 9.1±1.9, 7.9±2.0, 6.6±1.9 and 3.9±1.2 s, respectively. In additional other 16 CTP studies using the cross point method, we can capture the P in all (100%) examinations.

CONCLUSION

Scan starting at the cross point is best for Definition AS+, and the Ao=300 HU may be best for other scanner that needs 4 s for changing scan mode to obtain a fine input function for calculating absolute myocardial blood flow.

Coronary artery stenosis-related perfusion ratio using dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a pilot for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the stenosis-related quantitative perfusion ratio (QPR) for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Twenty-seven patients were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) before invasive coronary angiography (ICA) measuring the fractional flow reserve (FFR). Coronary lesions with FFR ≤ 0.8 were defined as hemodynamically significant CAD. The myocardial blood flow (MBF) was calculated using dynamic CTP data, and CT-QPR was calculated as the CT-MBF relative to the reference CT-MBF. The stenosis-related CT-MBF and QPR were calculated using Voronoi diagram-based myocardial segmentation from coronary CTA data. The relationships between FFR and stenosis-related CT-MBF or QPR and the diagnostic performance of the stenosis-related CT-MBF and QPR were evaluated. Of 81 vessels, FFR was measured in 39 vessels, and 20 vessels (51%) in 15 patients were diagnosed as hemodynamically significant CAD. The stenosis-related CT-QPR showed better correlation (r = 0.70, p < 0.05) than CT-MBF (r = 0.56, p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD were 95% and 58% for CT-MBF, and 95% and 90% for CT-QPR, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CT-QPR was significantly higher than that for the CT-MBF (0.94 vs. 0.79; p < 0.05). The stenosis-related CT-QPR derived from dynamic myocardial CTP and coronary CTA showed a better correlation with FFR and a higher diagnostic performance for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD than the stenosis-related CT-MBF.