Comparison Between Healthcare-Associated and Community-Acquired Infective Endocarditis at Tertiary Care Hospitals in Japan

Simultaneous Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Infective Endocarditis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Presentation

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) and periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) occur due to hematogenous bacterial spread, theoretically increasing the risk for concurrent infections. There is a scarcity of literature investigating this specific association. We aimed to assess the prevalence, comorbidities, and clinical presentation of patients who have simultaneous PJI and IE.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 655 patients (321 men, 334 women; 382 total hip arthroplasty, 273 total knee arthroplasty) who developed a PJI from July 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, at one institution. There were two groups created: patients diagnosed with PJI with IE (PJI + IE) and PJI patients who did not have IE (PJI). We analyzed clinical outcomes and comorbidities.

RESULTS

There were nine patients who had PJI with IE (1.4% of PJI patients). The C-reactive protein (170.9 versus 78, P = 0.026), Elixhauser comorbidity score (P = 0.002), length of hospital stay (LOS) (10.9 versus 5.7 days, P = 0.043), and the two-year post-discharge mortality rate (55.6 versus 9.0%, P = 0.0007) were significantly greater in the PJI+IE group. Comorbidities such as iron deficiency anemia (P = 0.03), coagulopathy (P = 0.02), complicated diabetes mellitus (P = 0.02), electrolyte disorders (P = 0.01), neurological disease (P = 0.004), paralysis (P = 0.04), renal failure (P = 0.0001), and valvular disease (P = 0.0008) occurred more frequently in the PJI + IE group. Modified Duke's criteria were met for possible or definite IE in 8 of the 9 patients (88.9%).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent PJIs and IE, although rare, are a potentially devastating disease state with increased LOS and two-year mortality rates. This emphasizes the need for appropriate IE workups in patients who have a PJI. The modified Duke's criteria is effective in establishing a diagnosis for IE in this scenario.

Epidemiological differences, clinical aspects, and short-term prognosis of patients with healthcare-associated and community-acquired infective endocarditis

Background

The prevalence of healthcare-associated infective endocarditis in Brazil is poorly known.

Aim

To analyze the epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics, and the prognosis of healthcare-associated infective endocarditis (HAIE) compared with community-acquired infective endocarditis (CIE) and identify the associated factors with hospital mortality.

Method

A historical cohort study was carried out, with a data collection period from January 2009 to December 2019 at the Federal University of São Paulo. Data were collected from medical records of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) hospitalized during the study period. Patients were classified into three groups: CIE, non-nosocomial HAIE (NN-HAIE) and nosocomial HAIE (NHAIE).

Results

A total of 204 patients with IE were included; of these, 127 (62.3%) were cases of HAIE, of which 83 (40.7%) were NN-HAIE and 44 (21.6%) were NHAIE. Staphylococcus spp. Were the main causative agents, especially in HAIE groups (P<0.001). Streptococcus spp. were more prevalent in the CIE group (P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was 44.6%, with no differences between groups. Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio (OR): 6.742), septic shock (OR 5.264), stroke (OR 3.576), heart failure (OR 7.296), and Intensive Care Unit admission (OR 7.768).

Conclusion

HAIE accounted for most cases in this cohort, with a higher prevalence of non-nosocomial infections. Staphylococcus spp. were the main causative agents. Hospital mortality was high, 44.6%, with no difference between groups.

Novel Diagnostic Methods for Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a dangerous disease and continues to have a high mortality rate. Unfortunately, despite continuous improvements in diagnostic methods, in many cases, blood cultures remain negative, and the pathogen causing endocarditis is unknown. This makes targeted therapy and the selection of appropriate antibiotics impossible. Therefore, we present what methods can be used to identify the pathogen in infective endocarditis. These are mainly molecular methods, including PCR and MGS, as well as imaging methods using radiotracers, which offer more possibilities for diagnosing IE. However, they are still not widely used in the diagnosis of IE. The article summarizes in which cases we should choose them and what we are most hopeful about in further research into the diagnosis of IE. In addition, registered clinical trials that are currently underway for the diagnosis of IE are also presented.

Non-nosocomial Healthcare-Associated Infective Endocarditis: A Distinct Entity? Data From the GAMES Series (2008-2021)

Background

Patients who acquire infective endocarditis (IE) following contact with the healthcare system, but outside the hospital, are classified as having non-nosocomial healthcare-associated IE (HCIE). Our aim was to characterize HCIE and establish whether its etiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach suggest it should be considered a distinct entity.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzes data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort including consecutive cases of IE at 45 hospitals across Spain from 2008 to 2021. HCIE was defined as IE detected in patients in close contact with the healthcare system (eg, patients receiving intravenous treatment, hemodialysis, or institutionalized). The prevalence and main characteristics of HCIE were examined and compared with those of community-acquired IE (CIE) and nosocomial IE (NIE) and with literature data.

Results

IE was diagnosed in 4520 cases, of which 2854 (63%) were classified as CIE, 1209 (27%) as NIE, and 457 (10%) as HCIE. Patients with HCIE showed a high burden of comorbidities, a high presence of intravascular catheters, and a predominant staphylococcal etiology, Staphylococcus aureus being identified as the most frequent causative agent (35%). They also experienced more persistent bacteremia, underwent fewer surgeries, and showed a higher mortality rate than those with CIE (32.4% vs 22.6%). However, mortality in this group was similar to that recorded for NIE (32.4% vs 34.9%, respectively, P = .40).

Conclusions

Our data do not support considering HCIE as a distinct entity. HCIE affects a substantial number of patients, is associated with a high mortality, and shares many characteristics with NIE.

Healthcare-Associated Infective Endocarditis—Surgical Perspectives

Health-care-associated infective endocarditis (HCA-IE), a disease with a poor prognosis, has become increasingly important. As surgical treatment is frequently required, this review aims to outline surgical perspectives on HCA-IE. We searched PubMed to identify publications from January 1980 to March 2022. Reports were evaluated by the authors against a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies reporting on surgical treatment of HCA-IE including outcome were selected. Currently, HCA-IE accounts for up to 47% of IE cases. Advanced age, cardiac implants, and comorbidity are important predispositions, and intravascular catheters or frequent vascular access are significant sources of infection. Staphylococci and enterococci are the leading causative microorganisms. Surgery, although frequently indicated, is rejected in 24–69% because of prohibitive risk. In-hospital mortality is significant after surgery (29–50%) but highest in patients rejected for operation (52–83%). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay is prolonged. With aging populations, age-dependent morbidity, increasing use of cardiac implants, and growing healthcare utilization, HCA-IE is anticipated to gain further importance. A better understanding of pathogenesis, clinical profile, and outcomes is paramount. Further research on surgical treatment is needed to provide more comprehensive information for defining the most suitable treatment option, finding the optimal time for surgery, and reducing morbidity and mortality.

Surgical treatment for infective endocarditis in the ageing society: a nationwide retrospective study in Japan

Objective

The current status of surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) among very elderly people is unclear.

Methods

We extracted data on patients in Japan with community-acquired IE who were admitted and discharged between April 2010 and February 2018 using a nationwide inpatient, the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We divided patients into three groups: non-elderly (<65 years), elderly (65–79 years) and very elderly (≥80 years). A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to compare proportions of surgical treatment and in-hospital mortality among the groups.

Results

We identified 20 667 eligible patients (median age 70 years, 61.0% men). The proportion of very elderly patients significantly increased (19.1% in 2010 to 29.7% in 2018). The proportion of surgical treatment was significantly lower, and in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in very elderly patients. This tendency was more pronounced among patients with in-hospital complications such as heart failure, stroke or embolism. Surgical treatment was significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality even in very elderly patients, both in an unmatched (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78) and a propensity score matched cohort (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.85).

Conclusions

The proportion of very elderly patients with IE was increasing, and very elderly patients had higher in-hospital mortality. The proportion of surgical treatment for IE among very elderly patients was low, but it was associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal strategy for IE among very elderly patients.