Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban in Japanese Patients With Venous Thromboembolism in Clinical Practice - A Post-Marketing Surveillance

Efficacy and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Japanese Patients With Venous Thromboembolism - The Primary Results From the KUROSIO Study

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as the first-choice anticoagulation therapy in the acute phase of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is limited real-world data for Japanese VTE patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The KUROSIO study (UMIN000023747) was a prospective long-term observational study comprising 1,017 patients with concurrent acute symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism and proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or isolated calf DVT initially treated with DOACs. After excluding 24 patients, 993 (mean age, 66.3±15.1 years; 58.6% females) were analyzed. The incidences of recurrent symptomatic VTE and major bleeding for up to 52 weeks after diagnosis were 3.2% and 2.2%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed chemotherapy and anemia as significant risk factors associated with recurrent symptomatic VTE and major bleeding, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of DOACs in Japanese patients with VTE were determined in this real-world observational study.

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with venous thromboembolism and active cancer: A subanalysis of the J'xactly study

BACKGROUND

Data on the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and active cancer are limited in the Japanese real-world setting.

METHODS

In this subanalysis of the J'xactly study, which was a multicenter, prospective, observational study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE and active cancer (n = 193) versus those without active cancer (n = 823).

RESULTS

Compared with patients without active cancer, those with active cancer demonstrated a significantly different age distribution, with fewer aged <65 and ≥75 years; a lower proportion of women; a lower mean body mass index; and a lower proportion of physical inactivity, injury, thrombophilia, and heart failure. There was no difference in the initial dose distribution of rivaroxaban between patients with and without active cancer. The incidences of recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding were not significantly different [VTE: 1.44 % vs. 2.80 % per patient-year, hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.18-1.39, p = 0.172; major bleeding: 4.49 % vs. 2.55 % per patient-year, HR 1.80, 95 % CI 0.82-3.95, p = 0.137]. Approximately 10 % of patients with active cancer died at 6 months, with a significantly higher cumulative all-cause mortality rate than those without active cancer (23.29 % vs. 2.03 % per patient-year, HR 11.31, 95 % CI 7.30-17.53, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with VTE and active cancer, rivaroxaban showed acceptable effectiveness, although clinically significant bleeding remains a concern.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000025072.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety Among 3 Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism - A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, are administered for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japan. However, only a few reports have compared the effectiveness and safety of these DOACs. Methods and Results: We retrospectively enrolled 702 patients who received DOACs for VTE treatment between September 2014 and March 2020. We investigated patient demographics, VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and mortality until March 2021, and compared them among the 3 DOACs. Most patients (~70%; n=496) were prescribed edoxaban, followed by apixaban (n=107) and rivaroxaban (n=99). Age, body mass index, renal function, and the proportion of cancer patients did not differ significantly among the DOACs. Edoxaban was administered relatively more in women with low body weight and anemia. The rate of pulmonary embolism was significantly lower among patients receiving edoxaban than apixaban or rivaroxaban (24.4% vs. 41.1% and 53.5%, respectively). VTE reoccurred in 2 patients administered apixaban and 1 patient administered edoxaban. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding at 1 year was 11.7%, 18.5%, and 9.0% in the edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of major bleeding and all-cause death, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, among the DOACs (log-rank P=0.316 and 0.722, respectively). Conclusions: The safety of the 3 DOACs did not differ significantly in clinical settings, despite differences in patient demographics.

Rivaroxaban Treatment for Patients With Unprovoked or Provoked Venous Thromboembolism ― Subanalysis of the J’xactly Study ―

Background: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain unclear.

Methods and Results: In this subanalysis of the J’xactly study, a multicenter prospective observational study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE according to unprovoked (n=388) or provoked (n=557) VTE status. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Compared with patients in the provoked group, patients in the unprovoked group were younger, less likely to be female, and had higher body weight. The incidence of symptomatic VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the unprovoked than provoked VTE group (3.54% vs. 1.77% per patient-year; P=0.032). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding events between rivaroxaban-treated patients with unprovoked and provoked VTE (2.31% vs. 3.75% per patient-year; P=0.289). Although the proportion of patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² who were non-users of antiplatelet agents was higher in the unprovoked VTE group, there was no interaction effect (BMI: 4.58% vs. 1.55% per patient-year [P=0.040; P for interaction=0.361]; concomitant antiplatelet agent non-users: 3.65% vs. 1.72% per patient-year [P=0.028; P for interaction=0.627]).

Conclusions: This subanalysis suggests the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE. In such patients, DOAC discontinuation should be considered carefully, particularly in those not using antiplatelet agents and those with a high BMI.