1
|
Kondo Y, Ishikawa T, Shimura M, Yamada K, Ukaji T, Tamura Y, Arai M, Mori K, Takeyama T, Hori Y, Hisauchi I, Nakahara S, Itabashi Y, Kobayashi S, Taguchi I. Cardiovascular Outcomes after Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1481. [PMID: 38592314 PMCID: PMC10934935 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the feasibility of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for de novo lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by comparing with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. Methods: By a systematic literature search, nine (five randomized controlled, two retrospective propensity-score matched, and two retrospective baseline-balanced) studies comparing the midterm clinical and angiographic outcomes after PCB angioplasty and DES placement were included, yielding 974 and 1130 ACS cases in PCB and DES groups, respectively. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiac mortality (CM), all-cause mortality (ACM), myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Late luminal loss (LLL) and bleeding events (BLD) were also estimated. Results: The frequencies of MACE in PCB and DES groups were 8.42% and 10.62%, respectively. PCB angioplasty had no significant impacts on all of MACE (risk ratio: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.68-1.18, p = 0.44), CM, ACM, MI, TVR, TLR, BLD, and LLL, compared to DES placement in random-effects model. Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed the feasibility of PCB angioplasty for the de novo lesions in patients with ACS in comparison with DES placement by the emergent procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tetsuya Ishikawa
- Department of Cardiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya 343-8555, Saitama, Japan; (Y.K.); (M.S.); (K.Y.); (T.U.); (Y.T.); (M.A.); (K.M.); (T.T.); (Y.H.); (I.H.); (S.N.); (Y.I.); (S.K.); (I.T.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sciahbasi A, Mazza TM, Pidone C, Samperi S, Cittadini E, Granatelli A. A New Frontier for Drug-Coated Balloons: Treatment of "De Novo" Stenosis in Large Vessel Coronary Artery Disease. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1320. [PMID: 38592181 PMCID: PMC10931954 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are a well-established option for treating in-stent restenosis endorsed by European Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. However, in recent years, a strategy of "leaving nothing behind" with DCB in de novo coronary stenosis has emerged as an appealing approach. Methods: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the current literature on the use of drug-coated balloons in the treatment of de novo stenosis in large vessel disease. Results: Observational studies, as well as randomized studies, demonstrated the safety of DCB percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in large vessel disease. The rate of major adverse cardiac events is even lower compared to drug-eluting stents in stable coronary artery disease. Conclusions: DCB PCI is feasible in large vessel disease, and future large, randomized studies are ongoing to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tiziano Maria Mazza
- Interventional Cardiology, Sandro Pertini Hospital-ASL RM2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Pidone
- Interventional Cardiology, Sandro Pertini Hospital-ASL RM2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Samperi
- Interventional Cardiology, Sandro Pertini Hospital-ASL RM2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Cittadini
- Interventional Cardiology, Sandro Pertini Hospital-ASL RM2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonino Granatelli
- Interventional Cardiology, Sandro Pertini Hospital-ASL RM2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang JL, Huang QJ, Chen MH. Efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon for de novo lesions of large coronary arteries: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon 2024; 10:e25264. [PMID: 38333846 PMCID: PMC10850513 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a novel approach to avoiding stent-related complications and has proven effective for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and small vessels. However, its role in the treatment of de novo lesions in large vessels is less settled. Aims To estimate the efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon versus stent in the treatment of de novo lesions in large coronary arteries. Methods We searched the literature until April 2023. We judged the safety of DCB based on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiac death, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and bleeding event; and efficacy according to late lumen loss (LLL), minimum lumen diameter (MLD). We conducted subgroup analyses according to stent type and whether urgent PCI was required. Results A total of 10 RCTs were included. Overall, LLL (mean difference (MD) = -0.19, 95 % confidence interval (CI): -0.32 to -0.06, P = 0.003) was lower in the DCB group than in the Stent arm. This effect was consistent in subgroup analysis regardless of stent type and disease type. In terms of safety indicators, there were no significant differences between DCB and stent. The subgroup analyses found that safety indicators showed no significant differences between DCB and drug-eluting stent (DES), but TLR was lower in the DCB than in the bare metal stent (BMS). Moreover, in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), safety indicators and LLL showed no significant differences between DCB and DES, but MLD in the DCB was smaller. While in patients with excluded STEMI, MACE and TLR was lower in the DCB compared with the overall stent. Conclusions DCB could be a promising alternative for treating de novo lesions in large coronary arteries with satisfactory efficacy and low risk, superior to BMS and not inferior to DES, with a trend toward lower late lumen loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Li Jiang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530007, China
| | - Qiao-Juan Huang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530007, China
| | - Meng-Hua Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530007, China
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530007, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lazar FL, Onea HL, Olinic DM, Cortese B. A 2024 scientific update on the clinical performance of drug-coated balloons. ASIAINTERVENTION 2024; 10:15-25. [PMID: 38425817 PMCID: PMC10900242 DOI: 10.4244/aij-d-23-00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Continuous advances in the field of interventional cardiology have led to the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB). These represent a promising device for overcoming the well-known limitations of traditional metallic stents, which are associated with a persistent yearly increased risk of adverse events. This technology has the ability to homogeneously transfer the drug into the vessel wall in the absence of a permanent prosthesis implanted in the coronary vessel. Robust data support the use of DCB for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but there is also currently growing evidence from long-term follow-up of large randomised clinical trials regarding the use of these devices in other scenarios, such as de novo small and large vessel disease, complex bifurcations, and diffuse coronary disease. Other critical clinical settings such as diabetes mellitus, high bleeding risk patients and acute coronary syndromes could be approached in the upcoming future by using DCB, alone or as part of a blended strategy in combination with drug-eluting stents. There have been important scientific and technical advances in the DCB field in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to review the most current data regarding the use of DCB, including the mid- and long-term follow-up reports on the safety and efficacy of this novel strategy in different clinical and angiographic scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florin-Leontin Lazar
- Iuiliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 5th Department, Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic No. 1, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Horea-Laurentiu Onea
- Iuiliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 5th Department, Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic No. 1, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Dan-Mircea Olinic
- Iuiliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 5th Department, Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic No. 1, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bernardo Cortese
- Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare, Milan, Italy
- DCB Academy, Milan, Italy
- CardioParc, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma Z, Liu K, Hu Y, Hu X, Wang B, Li Z. Comparison Between Drug-Coated Balloon and Stents in Large De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCT Data. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2024:10.1007/s10557-024-07548-2. [PMID: 38270690 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-024-07548-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although a number of studies involving small-vessel de novo coronary disease showed clinical benefits of drug-coated balloons (DCB), the role of DCB in large vessel lesions is still unclear. METHODS We searched main electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCB with stents for large vessel de novo coronary artery disease. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), composite cardiovascular death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS This study included 7 RCTs with 770 participants. DCB were associated with a marked risk reduction in MACE [Risk Ratio (RR): 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.04], TLR (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.14; P = 0.10), and late lumen loss [standard mean difference (SMD): -0.57; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.05; P = 0.03] as compared with stents. There is no significant difference in MI (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.54; P = 0.27), CD (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.78; P = 0.19), and minimal lumen diameter (SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.05; P = 0.08) between groups. In subgroup analyses, the risk reduction of MACE persisted in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.89; P = 0.03), and patients receiving DCB vs. bare metal stent (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.73; P = 0.01). In addition, there was no significant difference between the DCB group and the drug eluting stent group for MACE (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.60; P = 0.38). CONCLUSION DCB may be an effective therapeutic option in patients with large vessel de novo coronary artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Ma
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Kanling Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanhui Hu
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiwen Hu
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Binyu Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengyi Li
- Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abdelaziz A, Hafez A, Atta K, Elsayed H, Abdelaziz M, Elaraby A, Kadhim H, Mechi A, Ezzat M, Fadel A, Nasr A, Bakr A, Ghaith HS. Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2023; 23:605. [PMID: 38066453 PMCID: PMC10709955 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03633-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are an established strategy for coronary artery disease. However, the new generation drug-eluting stent (DES) is recommended for patients with Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for coronary artery revascularization. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the efficacy of DCBs in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. METHODS We searched the WOS, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL till March 2023, for studies that compared DCBs versus DES in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. We used a random-effects model to compare major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, Late lumen Loss (LLL), and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) between the two groups. RESULTS Thirteen studies comprising 2644 patients were included. The pooled OR showed non-inferiority of DCB over DES in terms of MACE (OR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.57 to 1.40], p = 0.63). When we defined MACE as a composite of cardiac death, MI, and TLR; the pooled OR favored DCB over DES (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.28 to 0.9], p = 0.02). Moreover, DCB was not inferior to DES in terms of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.8, p = 0.73), cardiac mortality, (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.56, p = 0.29), MI (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.34 to 2.29, p = 0.79), stent thrombosis (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.35 to 4.23, p = 0.76), TLR (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.93, p = 0.8), LLL (MD = -0.6, 95% CI: -0.3 to 0.19, p = 0.64), or MLD (MD = -0.4, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.25, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis indicated that DCB intervention was not inferior to DES in the PCI setting in patients with AMI, and can be recommended as a feasible strategy in AMI. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42023412757.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abdelaziz
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Abdelrahman Hafez
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Institute of Medicine, National Research Mordovia State University, Saransk, Russia
| | - Karim Atta
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Institute of Medicine, National Research Mordovia State University, Saransk, Russia
| | - Hanaa Elsayed
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt.
- Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
| | - Mohamed Abdelaziz
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Elaraby
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hallas Kadhim
- Al Muthanna University College of Medicine, Samawah, Iraq
| | - Ahmed Mechi
- Medicine College, Internal Medicine Department, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
| | - Mahmoud Ezzat
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Fadel
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Nasr
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt
| | - Ali Bakr
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hazem S Ghaith
- Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Cairo, Egypt
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun B, Zhang XT, Chen RR. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions in Large Vessels: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2023:10.1007/s10557-023-07526-0. [PMID: 37999833 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-023-07526-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-coated balloons (DCB) can be used as an alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with de novo small vessel coronary artery disease. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of solely using DCB versus DES in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo coronary lesions in large vessels. METHOD A database search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and http://Clinicaltrials.gov for trials comparing DCB only with DES in treating de novo coronary lesions in large vessels. Efficacy outcomes included coronary angiography (CAG), follow-up minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and late luminal loss (LLL). Safety outcomes included target lesion failure [TLF: cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR)] and their individual components. RESULTS We included seven randomized control trials (RCTs) with 816 patients, of which 422 and 394 patients were in the DCB and DES groups, respectively. MLD measured during the 6-12 months follow-up in the DCB group was statistically significantly smaller than in the DES group (MD -0.21, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.07, P = 0.003, I2 = 52%). LLL measured at 6-12 months follow-up was statistically significantly lower in the DCB group than in the DES group (MD -0.13, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.05, P = 0.003, I2 = 60%). TLF, cardiac death, MI, and TLR, were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION Use of DCB was associated with less LLL at 6-12 months than DES and was not associated with any increase in adverse clinical events. This data suggests DCB are as effective in treating de novo coronary lesions in large vessels as DES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Xi Jing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Xu Tong Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Xi Jing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Shaanxi, China
| | - Rui Rui Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Tang Du Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|