Comparison of Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin Added to Heart Failure Treatment in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

New-onset syncope in diabetic patients treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a Chinese population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Syncope is a symptom that poses an important diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, and generates significant cost for the healthcare system. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated beneficial cardiovascular effects, but their possible effects on incident syncope have not been fully investigated. This study compared the effects of SGLT2i and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) on new-onset syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective, territory-wide cohort study enrolling type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients treated with SGLT2i or DPP4i between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020, in Hong Kong, China. The outcomes were hospitalization of new-onset syncope, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression and different approaches using the propensity score were applied to evaluate the association between SGLT2i and DPP4i with incident syncope and mortality. After matching, a total of 37 502 patients with T2DM were included (18 751 SGLT2i users vs. 18 751 DPP4i users). During a median follow-up of 5.56 years, 907 patients were hospitalized for new-onset syncope (2.41%), and 2346 patients died from any cause (6.26%), among which 471 deaths (1.26%) were associated with cardiovascular causes. Compared with DPP4i users, SGLT2i therapy was associated with a 51% lower risk of new-onset syncope [HR 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.57; P < 0.001], 65% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.26-0.46; P < 0.001), and a 70% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.26-0.34; P < 0.001) in the fully adjusted model. Similar associations with syncope were observed for dapagliflozin (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58-0.85; P < 0.001), canagliflozin (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.36-0.63; P < 0.001), and ertugliflozin (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.68; P < 0.001), but were attenuated for empagliflozin (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.59-1.05; P = 0.100) after adjusting for potential confounders. The subgroup analyses suggested that, compared with DPP4i, SGLT2i was associated with a significantly decreased risk of incident syncope among T2DM patients, regardless of gender, age, glucose control status, Charlson comorbidity index, and the association remained constant amongst those with common cardiovascular drugs and most antidiabetic drugs at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Compared with DPP4i, SGLT2i was associated with a significantly lower risk of new-onset syncope in patients with T2DM, regardless of gender, age, degree of glycaemic control, and comorbidity burden.

Differing Efficacy of Dapagliflozin Versus Empagliflozin on the Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Observation Using a Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses of large clinical trials investigating SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors have suggested their protective effects against atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the results were predominantly driven from trials involving dapagliflozin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used a nationwide, population-based cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin between May 2016 and December 2018. An active-comparator, new-user design was used, and the 2 groups of patients were matched using propensity scores. The primary outcome was incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, which was analyzed using both the main intention-to-treat and sensitivity analysis that censored patients who skipped their medications for ≥30 days. Men ≥55 years of age and women ≥60 years of age with ≥1 traditional risk factor or those with established cardiovascular disease were categorized as high cardiovascular risk group. Patients not included in the high-risk group were categorized as low risk. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, a total of 137 928 patients (mean age, 55 years; 58% men) were included and followed up for 2.2±0.6 years. The risk of incident atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the dapagliflozin group in both the main (hazard ratio [HR], 0.885 [95% CI, 0.789-0.992]) and sensitivity analyses (HR, 0.835 [95% CI, 0.719-0.970]). Notably, this was consistent in both the low and high cardiovascular risk groups. There was no effect modification by age, sex, body mass index, duration of diabetes, or renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world, population-based study demonstrates that patients with type 2 diabetes using dapagliflozin may have a lower risk of developing nonvalvular atrial fibrillation than those using empagliflozin.

Comparative cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients taking dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin: a nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors displayed cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetes mellitus in previous studies; however, there were some heterogeneities regarding respective cardiovascular outcomes within the class. Furthermore, their efficacies in Asians, females, and those with low cardiovascular risks were under-represented. Thus, we compared the cardiovascular outcomes between new users of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in a broad range of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a nationwide population-based real-world cohort from Korea.

METHODS

Korean National Health Insurance registry data between May 2016 and December 2018 were extracted, and an active-comparator new-user design was applied. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF)-related events (i.e., hospitalization for HF and HF-related death), myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. The secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 366,031 new users of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin were identified. After 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching, 72,752 individuals (mean age approximately 56 years, 42% women) from each group were included in the final analysis, with a follow-up of 150,000 ~ person-years. Approximately 40% of the patients included in the study had type 2 diabetes mellitus as their sole cardiovascular risk factor, with no other risk factors. The risk of the primary outcome was not different significantly between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin users (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.855-1.006). The risks of secondary outcomes were also similar, with the exception of the risks of HF-related events (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.714-0.989) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.618-0.921), which were significantly lower in the dapagliflozin users.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale nationwide population-based real-world cohort study revealed no significant difference in composite cardiovascular outcomes between new users of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin. However, dapagliflozin might be associated with lower risks of hospitalization or death due to HF and cardiovascular death than empagliflozin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Potential favorable action of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on sudden cardiac death: a brief overview

The primary pharmacological action of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors is to inhibit the reabsorption of glucose and sodium ions from the proximal tubules of the kidney and to promote urinary glucose excretion. Notably, several clinical trials have recently demonstrated potent protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD), regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes. However, the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on sudden cardiac death (SCD) or fatal ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the pathophysiology of which is partly similar to that of HF and CKD, remains undetermined. The cardiorenal protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors have been reported to include hemodynamic improvement, reverse remodeling of the failing heart, amelioration of sympathetic hyperactivity, correction of anemia and impaired iron metabolism, antioxidative effects, correction of serum electrolyte abnormalities, and antifibrotic effects, which may lead to prevent SCD and/or VAs. Recently, as possible direct cardiac effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, not only inhibition of Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger (NHE) activity, but also suppression of late Na⁺ current have been focused on. In addition to the indirect cardioprotective mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors, suppression of aberrantly increased late Na⁺ current may contribute to preventing SCD and/or VAs via restoration of the prolonged repolarization phase in the failing heart. This review summarizes the results of previous clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors for prevention of SCD, their impact on the indices of electrocardiogram, and the possible molecular mechanisms of their anti-arrhythmic effects.

Angiotensin pathways under therapy with empagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure

AIMS

Large outcome studies demonstrated a reduction of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a key player in fluid and sodium regulation. The classic angiotensin-converting enzyme-angiotensin II-angiotensin-1 receptor axis (Ang I-ACE-Ang II receptor axis) is predominantly angiotensin II (Ang-II) induced and promotes vasoconstriction. In contrast, the angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2-angiotensin-(1-7)-Mas axis (Mas-axis) is mediated by the metabolites angiotensin-1-7 (Ang-(1-7)) and angtiotensin-1-5 (Ang-(1-5)) and exerts cardioprotective effects.

METHODS

We previously investigated the effect of empagliflozin on the systemic haemodynamic in patients with stable CHF (NYHA II-III) in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial 'Analysing the Effect of Empagliflozin on Reduction of Tissue Sodium Content in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (ELSI)'. In a post hoc analysis, we now analysed whether empagliflozin has an effect on the RAS by measuring detailed RAS profiles (LC-MS/MS-based approach) in 72 patients from ELSI. We compared RAS parameters after 1-month and 3-months treatment with empagliflozin or placebo to baseline. The secondary goal was to analyse whether the effect of empagliflozin on RAS parameters was dependent on angiotensin-receptor-blocking (ARB) or angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor (ACEI) co-medication.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin medication induced a significant rise in Ang-II [68.5 pmol/L (21.3-324.2) vs. 131.5 pmol/L (34.9-564.0), P = 0.001], angiotensin-I (Ang-I) [78.7 pmol/L (21.5-236.6) vs. 125.9 pmol/L (52.6-512.9), P < 0.001], Ang-(1-7) [3.0 pmol/L (3.0-15.0) vs. 10.1 pmol/L (3.0-31.3), P = 0.006], and Ang-(1-5) [5.4 pmol/L (2.0-22.9) vs. 9.9 pmol/L (2.8-36.4), P = 0.004], which was not observed in the placebo group (baseline to 3-months treatment). A significant rise in Ang-II (206.4 pmol/L (64.2-750.6) vs. 568.2 pmol/L (164.7-1616.4), P = 0.001), Ang-(1-7) (3.0 pmol/L (3.0-14.1) vs. 15.0 pmol/L (3.0-31.3), P = 0.017), and Ang-(1-5) [12.2 pmol/L (3.8-46.6) vs. 36.4 pmol/L (11.1-90.7), P = 0.001] under empagliflozin treatment was only seen in the subgroup of patients with ARB co-medication, whereas no change of Ang-II (16.7 pmol/L (2.0-60.8) vs. 26.4 pmol/L (10.7-63.4), P = 0.469), Ang-(1-7) (6.6 pmol/L (3.0-20.7) vs. 10.5 pmol/L (3.0-50.5), P = 0.221), and Ang-(1-5) (2.7 pmol/L (2.0-8.4) vs. 2.8 pmol/L (2.0-6.9), P = 0.851) was observed in patients with empagliflozin that were on ACEI co-medication (baseline to 3-months treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that empagliflozin might lead to an activation of both the Ang I-ACE-Ang II receptor axis and the Mas-axis pathway. Activation of the Ang I-ACE-Ang II receptor axis and the protective Mas-axis pathway after initiating treatment with empagliflozin was only seen in patients with ARB co-medication, in contrast to co-medication with ACEI.

Kidney outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus did not differ between individual sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors

Data comparing kidney outcomes between individual sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are limited. Here, we aimed to compare the subsequent risk of developing kidney outcomes between individual inhibitors. This would be the first study to compare kidney outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus who were newly treated with individual SGLT2 inhibitors using a large-scale real-world dataset. To do this, we analyzed results from 12,100 patients with diabetes mellitus who were taking different SGLT2 inhibitors (2,573 with empagliflozin; 2,214 with dapagliflozin; 2,100 with canagliflozin; and 5,213 with other such inhibitors). The primary outcome was the rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline as assessed using a linear mixed-effects model with an unstructured covariance. The median age of the patients was 53 years, and 84.4% of the patients were men. The median fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels were 147 (interquartile range 126-178) mg/dL and 7.5 (6.9-8.4)%, respectively. The median eGFR was 78 mL/min/1.73 m² (interquartile range 68-90). The mean follow-up period was 773 days. The annual eGFR slopes of empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and other SGLT2 inhibitors were -1.15 (95% confidence interval, -1.33 to -0.96), -1.14 (-1.32 to -0.96), -1.24 (-1.44 to -1.04), and -1.06 (-1.18 to -0.94) ml/min/1.73 m², respectively. No significant interaction was detected between the SGLT2 inhibitors and time using a linear mixed-effects model. A multitude of sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our primary results. Thus, we found that there was no significant difference in the annual eGFR decline slopes between patients taking different SGLT2 inhibitors.

Comparison of cardiovascular and renal outcomes between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes without prior cardiovascular or renal disease

Background

Cardiovascular and renal benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been clearly demonstrated. However, studies comparing the effects of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin are scarce. In addition, relatively few studies have analyzed the effects of SGLT2i in diabetic patients without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or heart failure (HF), and current guidelines recommend SGLT2i and other antidiabetic drugs equally in this population. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in patients with type 2 diabetes without prior ASCVD, CKD, or HF.

Methods

Using a propensity-score matching method, we retrospectively analyzed 921 patients treated with dapagliflozin, 921 patients treated with empagliflozin, and 1842 patients treated with DPP4i (control group). Study outcomes comprised composite coronary events (acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularization), composite ischemic events (coronary events and stroke), and composite heart failure and renal events.

Results

During follow up (median, 43.4 months), the incidence of composite coronary events was significantly lower in the SGLT2i groups than in the control group, and the incidence of composite ischemic events was lower in the dapagliflozin group than in the control group. Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin both demonstrated significant benefits in terms of HF and renal outcomes, supported by renoprotective effects, as assessed by the change in glomerular filtration rate. At 24–36 months of treatment, the empagliflozin group had higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and lower glycated hemoglobin levels, compared to those in the dapagliflozin and control groups.

Conclusion

SGLT2i use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of ASCVD, HF hospitalization, and renal events, compared to that with DPP4i use among diabetic patients without prior ASCVD, CKD, or HF. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, supporting a SGLT2i class effect.

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are oral diabetes medications that enhance the excretion of glucose by preventing the renal proximal tubules from reabsorbing glucose, which lowers glucose levels in plasma. Currently, studies have shown that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial impacts on cardiovascular outcomes, but their effect varies between the individual SGLT2 inhibitors. Thus, the current meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in preventing cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. A search of studies comparing cardiovascular events between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes published up to 1 July 2022 was done by two reviewers independently on PubMed, Embase and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHIL). The pre-specified primary endpoints were cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Overall four studies were included in this meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in the incidence of myocardial infarction (risk ratio (RR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-1.09), heart failure (RR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.56-1.04), cardiovascular mortality (RR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.18-1.20) and stroke (RR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.84-1.38) between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin. Results have shown that the risk of developing stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death were not significantly different in the two groups.

Short-Term Treatment with Empagliflozin Resulted in Dehydration and Cardiac Arrest in an Elderly Patient with Specific Complications: A Case Report and Literature Review

Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor widely used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Our case study involved a 68-year-old patient who was admitted to the hospital because of a cerebral infarction. The patient was simultaneously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and heart failure, for which empagliflozin was initiated. However, food and fluid intake were reduced due to poor appetite. In addition to the side effects of empagliflozin, the patient developed severe dehydration and cardiac arrest. Careful assessment of dehydration and preventive water intake is recommended in elderly patients and those with neurological deficits, especially when receiving empagliflozin.

Responders to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Improving Left Ventricular Function

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i)-incorporated medical therapy is associated with cardiac function improvement in patients with heart failure. However, the factors associated with such an improvement remain unknown.This study included patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus who received SGLT2i-incorporated medical therapy in our institute. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at baseline and 3-18 months later. The factors associated with cardiac function improvement were investigated.A total of 47 patients (median age, 69 years old; 35 men) were included in this study. SGLT2i was administered for median 284 days (range: 86-730 days). The left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 39.0% to 54.0% (P < 0.001), and the E/e' ratio decreased from 14.0 to 10.4 (P = 0.002). Younger age, higher serum albumin level, and lower serum sodium level were independently associated with an improvement in systolic function, defined as an increase in the ejection fraction of ≥ 35% among patients with systolic heart failure (P = 0.018). Male sex and impaired renal function tended to be associated with an improvement in diastolic function, defined as a decrease in the E/e' ratio of ≥ 20% among the overall cohort.Several factors were associated with improvements in systolic and diastolic functions during the SGLT2i-incorporated medical therapy.

SGLT2 inhibitors in acute decompensated heart failure, what do we know?

The current worldwide prevalence of heart failure is growing, while its combination with cardiovascular and other conditions determines a poor prognosis in these patients. Furthermore, acute decompensated heart failure is associated with a low survival rate mostly caused by target organ damage. The effects of early administration of SGLT2 inhibitors on renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure are being studied to determine the possibility of improving response to treatment, as well as partial or complete recovery of renal function. The goal of the review was to synthesize currently available evidence for the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. A systematic search for studies published from 2018 to 2021 and their analysis was carried out in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE.

Comparison of cardiovascular outcomes between SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus

Background

There have been scarce data comparing cardiovascular outcomes between individual sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. We aimed to compare the subsequent cardiovascular risk between individual SGLT2 inhibitors.

Methods

We analyzed 25,315 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) newly taking SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin: 5302, dapagliflozin: 4681, canagliflozin: 4411, other SGLT2 inhibitors: 10,921). We compared the risks of developing heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), angina pectoris (AP), stroke, and atrial fibrillation (AF) between individual SGLT2 inhibitors.

Results

Median age was 52 years, and 82.5% were men. The median fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels were 149 (Q1-Q3:127–182) mg/dL and 7.5 (Q1-Q3:6.9–8.6) %. During a mean follow-up of 814 ± 591 days, 855 HF, 143 MI, 815 AP, 340 stroke, and 139 AF events were recorded. Compared with empagliflozin, the risk of developing HF, MI, AP, stroke, and AF was not significantly different in dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and other SGLT inhibitors. For developing HF, compared with empagliflozin, hazard ratios of dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and other SGLT2 inhibitors were 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–1.27), 1.08 (95% CI 0.87–1.35), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.73–1.07), respectively. Wald tests showed that there was no significant difference in the risk of developing HF, MI, AP, stroke, and AF among individual SGLT2 inhibitors. We confirmed the robustness of these results through a multitude of sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

The risks for subsequent development of HF, MI, AP, stroke, and AF were comparable between individual SGLT2 inhibitors. This is the first study comparing the wide-range cardiovascular outcomes of patients with DM treated with individual SGLT2 inhibitors using large-scale real-world data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-022-01508-6.

Differences in outcomes of hospitalizations for heart failure after SGLT2 inhibitor treatment: effect modification by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Background

The treatment effects on hospitalization for heart failure (hHF) from sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may vary among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients depending on whether or not they have established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). We aimed to examine differences in hHF outcomes after dapagliflozin or empagliflozin use between T2D patients with and without a history of established ASCVD.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study in Taiwan. We included T2D patients newly receiving dapagliflozin or empagliflozin during 2016–2019, and followed them up until December 31, 2020. We implemented 1:1 propensity score matching to create homogenous groups for comparisons. We generated Cox proportional hazard models to compare the risk of hHF between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (reference group). We included interaction terms of SGLT2 inhibitor and ASCVD history in the regression models to examine effect modification by ASCVD.

Results

We included a total cohort of 9,586 dapagliflozin new users and 9,586 matched empagliflozin new users. The overall hHF risks were similar for dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (HR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.74–1.09). However, differential hHF risks between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin were observed only in the subgroup without ASCVD (HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.49–0.90), while not in the subgroup with ASCVD (HR: 1.12, 95% 0.87–1.45), and the p-value for examining interaction was 0.0097.

Conclusion

In this study, history of established ASCVD was associated with different hHF risks among SGLT2 inhibitors. For T2D patients without ASCVD, dapagliflozin may offer a more favorable hHF reduction effect, compared to empagliflozin, in clinical practice. Future prospective studies should be conducted to validate our findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-021-01406-3.

The Effect of Dapagliflozin on Platelet Function Testing Profiles in Diabetic Patients: The EDGE Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

This prospective pharmacodynamic (PD) study assessed the effect of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), dapagliflozin, on platelet reactivity.

METHODS

Patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (n = 27) who were on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin 81 mg daily, and clopidogrel 75 mg daily were recruited. Platelet function was evaluated with the VerifyNow™ P2Y₁₂ assay (Werfen, Bedford, MA, USA) and assessed prior to initiation of and after 10 days of treatment with dapagliflozin 10 mg once-daily dose regimen. Results were compared with a paired t test.

RESULTS

Treatment with dapagliflozin significantly decreased P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) by 20%, (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5-32.6%, p value 0.002). The mean difference in PRU was 36.70 (95% CI 16.66-56.75). No patients experienced any serious adverse events (SAEs).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly diminished platelet reactivity was observed on dapagliflozin as compared to without dapagliflozin. This dedicated pharmacodynamic study could be potentially informative and applicable for Trinidadian stable CAD patients with T2DM on DAPT. Further studies are required to confirm these exploratory findings.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EDGE ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04400760.

Efficacy of Continuing SGLT2 Inhibitors on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, the clinical implication of SGLT2i therapy in patients with acute decompensated HF remains uncertain. We prospectively studied 86 type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients (71.8 ± 12.1 years, 55 men) who were hospitalized for acute decompensated HF and received SGLT2i during the index hospitalization. Among the patients, 56 continued SGLT2i at discharge and 30 did not. The continued group experienced fewer HF re-hospitalizations than the discontinued group (24% versus 39%, P = 0.008) with a hazard ratio of 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.10-0.85) adjusted for other significant potential confounders. In conclusion, long-term SGLT2i therapy might prevent unplanned HF re-hospitalization in patients with T2DM and acute decompensated HF.

Relationship Between HbA1c Level and Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The DAPA-HF trial demonstrated that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduced worsening heart failure (HF) events in chronic HF patients with or without type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM). However, it remains unclear whether the effectiveness of SGLT2i is also observed in patients with decompensated HF irrespective of HbA1c level. Eighty-one T2DM patients hospitalized due to decompensated HF were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to their HbA1c levels (group H, HbA1c 6.9-13.0%, n = 41; group L, HbA1c < 6.9%, n = 40). After the initial management of HF, one of the SGLT2i (canagliflozin 100 mg/day or dapagliflozin 5 mg/day or empagliflozin 10 mg/day) was non-randomly administered, and clinical parameters associating with HF and T2DM were followed for 7 days. No symptomatic hypoglycemia was observed in any patient. In both groups, urine glucose excretion was increased significantly after the administration of SGLT2i. However, its amount was greater in group H than group L. Urine volume was increased significantly at day 1 in both groups. Urine volume returned to the baseline after one week in group L. In contrast, the increase in urine volume persisted at least for one week in group H. Of note, a decrease in B-type natriuretic peptide levels after the initiation of SGLT2i was observed in both groups similarly despite differences in urine output and excretion of urine glucose. In conclusion, SGLT2i can improve decompensated HF in patients with T2DM irrespective of the HbA1c level.