Roles of histamine receptors in pain perception: A study using receptors gene knockout mice

Efficacy and Safety of Non-brain Penetrating H1-Antihistamines for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

H₁ receptor antagonists, known as H₁-antihistamines (AHs), inactivate the histamine H₁-receptor thereby preventing histamine causing the primary symptoms of allergic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, pollinosis, food allergies, and urticaria. AHs, which are classified into first-generation (fgAHs) and second-generation (sgAHs) antihistamines, are the first line of treatment for allergic diseases. Although fgAHs are effective, they cause adverse reactions such as potent sedating effects, including drowsiness, lassitude, and cognitive impairment; anticholinergic effects, including thirst and tachycardia. Consequently, the use of fgAHs is not recommended for allergic diseases. Today, sgAHs, which are minimally sedating and, therefore, may be used at more effective doses, are the first-line treatment for alleviating the symptoms of allergic diseases. Pharmacologically, the use of sedating fgAHs is limited to antiemetics, anti-motion sickness drugs, and antivertigo drugs. The use of histamine H₁-receptor occupancy (H₁RO) based on positron emission tomography (PET) has been developed for the evaluation of brain penetrability. Based on the results of the H₁RO-PET studies, non-brain-penetrating AHs (nbpAHs) have recently been reclassified among sgAHs. The nbpAHs are rapidly acting and exhibit minimal adverse reactions and, thus, are considered first-line drugs for allergic diseases. In this review, we will introduce recent topics on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of AHs and make recommendations for the use of nbpAHs as first-line treatment options for allergic diseases.

Contribution of Histamine to Nociceptive Behaviors Induced by Intrathecally Administered Cholecystokinin-8

The involvement of spinal release of histamine in the nociceptive behaviors induced by cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8) was investigated in mice. Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of CCK-8 elicited the nociceptive behaviors consisting of biting and licking. The nociceptive behaviors induced by i.t. treatment with CCK-8 showed two bell-shaped patterns. The histamine H₃ receptor antagonist significantly promoted the nociceptive behaviors induced by CCK-8 at doses of 1–100 fmol and 100 pmol. The nociceptive behaviors elicited by CCK-8 was inhibited by i.t. administration of the CCK-B receptor antagonist in a dose-dependent manner, but not by the CCK-A receptor antagonist. The nociceptive behaviors induced by CCK-8 were markedly suppressed by i.t. pretreatment with antiserum against histamine and were abolished in histidine decarboxylase-deleted gene mice. In histamine H₁ receptor-deleted gene mice, the nociceptive behaviors induced at both 10 amol and 10 pmol of CCK-8 were not affected. The tachykinin neurokinin-1 (NK₁) receptor antagonists inhibited CCK-8 (10 pmol)-induced nociceptive behaviors in a dose-dependent manner. CCK-8 (10 amol)-induced nociceptive behaviors was not antagonized by co-administration with the tachykinin NK₁ receptor antagonists. The nociceptive behaviors elicited by CCK-8 were inhibited by i.t. administration of the antagonist for the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in a dose-dependent manner. Our results suggest that the nociceptive behaviors induced by i.t. administration of CCK-8 (10 pmol) are mediated through the spinal release of histamine and are elicited via activation of the tachykinin NK₁ and NMDA receptors, whereas the nociceptive behaviors induced by i.t. administration of CCK-8 (10 amol) are mediated through the spinal release of histamine and elicited via NMDA receptor activation.

Molecular and cellular mechanisms that initiate pain and itch

Somatosensory neurons mediate our sense of touch. They are critically involved in transducing pain and itch sensations under physiological and pathological conditions, along with other skin-resident cells. Tissue damage and inflammation can produce a localized or systemic sensitization of our senses of pain and itch, which can facilitate our detection of threats in the environment. Although acute pain and itch protect us from further damage, persistent pain and itch are debilitating. Recent exciting discoveries have significantly advanced our knowledge of the roles of membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels in the encoding of information leading to pain and itch sensations. This review focuses on molecular and cellular events that are important in early stages of the biological processing that culminates in our senses of pain and itch.

Evaluating the Anti-nociceptive and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Ketotifen and Fexofenadine in Rats

PURPOSE

As H1 and H3 receptors' roles has been defined in peripheral pains in some papers and because histamine is known for its role in inflammatory responses; this study investigated the possible analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of ketotifen and fexofenadine as relatively safe long acting anti histamines in both chronic chemical pain and acute inflammation in rats.

METHODS

In this study, male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 225-250 grams were used. In order to evaluate the chemical chronic pain, sub-plantar injection of formalin applied and the pain scores were recorded every 15 seconds during 60 minutes. Carrageenan injection to the right hind paw was used for induction of acute inflammation and the paw edema was measured every 60 minutes for 4 hours.

RESULTS

Based on the results, both ketotifen and fexofenadine were able to significantly diminish chemical acute and chronic pain as well as inflammation in comparison with the control group and the effects were acceptable according to the standard treatment. Both effects for fexofenadine started later than those of ketotifen.

CONCLUSION

According to the outcomes of the study, ketotifen and fexofenadine demonstrated significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory characteristics in both models of chemical pain and acute inflammation in laboratory animals.

Two histamine H2 receptor antagonists, zolantidine and cimetidine, modulate nociception in cholestatic rats

Cholestasis is associated with analgesia. The histamine H(2) receptors control pain perception. The involvement of histamine H(2) receptors on modulation of nociception in a model of elevated endogenous opioid tone, cholestasis, was investigated in this study using zolantidine and cimetidine as two H(2) receptor antagonists and dimaprit as a selective H(2) receptor agonist. Cholestasis was induced by ligation of the main bile duct using two ligatures and transsection of the duct at the midpoint between them. A significant increase in tail-flick latencies was observed in cholestatic rats compared to non-cholestatic rats. Administration of zolantidine (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) and cimetidine (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) in the cholestatic group significantly increased tail-flick latencies while dimaprit (10 and 20 mg/kg) injection in the cholestatic group decreased tail-flick latencies compared to the saline treated cholestatic group. Antinociception produced by injection of zolantidine and cimetidine in cholestatic rats was attenuated by co-administration of naloxone. Drug injection in non-cholestatic rats did not alter tail-flick latencies compared to the saline treated rats at any of the doses. At the doses used here, none of the drugs impaired motor coordination as revealed by the rota rod test. These data show that the histamine H(2) receptor system may be involved in the regulation of nociception during cholestasis. According to the hypothesis that increasing the nociception threshold in cholestasis may lead to a decrease in the perception of pruritus, the provision of the drugs that increase the threshold to nociception may be a novel approach to the treatment of cholestatic pruritus.

Differential responding of autonomic function to histamine H₁ antagonism in irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

The role of histamine in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is largely unknown. Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in IBS patients is also not fully confirmed. We hypothesized that blockade of histamine H₁ receptors affects ANS responses differently between IBS subjects and controls.

METHODS

Subjects were 12 IBS subjects and 12 age- and sex-matched controls. Either 100 μg kg⁻¹ chlorphenamine or the same amount of saline was administered on different days. The rectum was stimulated with electrical currents of 0 mA (sham) or 30 mA. Autonomic nervous system function was measured using mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), high frequency (HF) component of HR variability, low frequency/high frequency ratio (LF/HF ratio) and plasma catecholamines and histamine. Subjective perceived stress during the examination was evaluated on an ordinate scale.

KEY RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure showed significant effects of diagnosis (P < 0.05) and drug × diagnosis interaction (P < 0.05). The MAP significantly increased after chlorphenamine administration in IBS subjects, but not in controls. Heart rate revealed a significant drug effect (P < 0.001), which decreased after chlorphenamine administration in controls, but not in IBS subjects. Perceived stress significantly increased by rectal stimulation (P < 0.001) and a significant stimulus × diagnosis interaction (P < 0.05) was revealed, indicating greater reduction in IBS subjects by chlorphenamine.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

Sympathetic vasomotor tone in IBS subjects differentially responded on administration of a histamine H₁ antagonist to that of controls. These findings suggest an increased histaminergic activity in IBS subjects.

Enhanced antinociceptive effects of morphine in histamine H2 receptor gene knockout mice

We have previously shown that antinociceptive effects of morphine are enhanced in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout mice. In the present study, involvement of supraspinal histamine H2 receptor in antinociception by morphine was examined using histamine H2 receptor gene knockout (H2KO) mice and histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Antinociception was evaluated by assays for thermal (hot-plate, tail-flick and paw-withdrawal tests), mechanical (tail-pressure test) and chemical (formalin and capsaicin tests) stimuli. Thresholds for pain perception in H2KO mice were higher than wild-type mice. Antinociceptive effects of intracerebroventricularly administered morphine were enhanced in the H2KO mice compared to wild-type mice. Intracerebroventricular co-administration of morphine and cimetidine produced significant antinociceptive effects in the wild-type mice when compared to morphine or cimetidine alone. Furthermore, zolantidine, a selective and hydrophobic H2 receptor antagonist, enhanced the effects of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. These results suggest that histamine exerts inhibitory effects on morphine-induced antinociception through H2 receptors at the supraspinal level. Our present and previous studies suggest that H1 and H2 receptors cooperatively function to modulate pain perception in the central nervous system.

Enhanced antinociception by intracerebroventricularly administered orexin A in histamine H1 or H2 receptor gene knockout mice

Orexins are neuropeptides that are mostly expressed in the posterior and lateral hypothalamus, and related to the central control of appetite, arousal, and antinociception. Orexin neurons projected to the tuberomammillary nucleus and orexins may release histamine from the histamine neurons in this nucleus. Histamine is known to cause hypernociception. The roles of histamine H1 and H2 receptors in the orexin A-induced antinociception, however, have not been clarified yet. Here we studied the effects of histamine H1 and H2 receptors on orexin A-produced antinociception using histamine receptor knockout mice in four assays of nociception; the hot-plate, the tail-flick, the tail-pressure and the capsaicin tests. Furthermore we studied effects of histamine H1 and H2 receptor antagonists on orexin A-produced antinociception in C57BL/6 mice. The antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. orexin A were greater in histamine H1 receptor or H2 receptor knockout mice than in the wild-type mice in all four assays of pain. Furthermore, treatment of C57BL/6 mice with a combination of i.c.v. orexin A and d-chlorpheniramine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist) or cimetidine (a histamine H2 receptor antagonist) showed a greater antinociception than i.c.v. orexin A alone in all four assays. These findings suggest the possibility that orexin A may activate H1 and H2 receptors in the supraspinal levels through the release of histamine from neurons, which might attenuate the antinociceptive effects of orexin A. Thus, the blocking of the histamine H1 or H2 receptor may produce antinociception and enhance the orexin A-induced antinociception.