1
|
Leri F, Tremblay A, Sorge RE, Stewart J. Methadone maintenance reduces heroin- and cocaine-induced relapse without affecting stress-induced relapse in a rodent model of poly-drug use. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29:1312-20. [PMID: 15039768 DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Although it is well established that methadone can be an effective treatment for opiate addiction, it is not clear how methadone maintenance affects cocaine use and cravings in individuals who self-administer both opiates and cocaine. In our attempt to explore the effect of methadone maintenance on the effects of cocaine, we first assessed the locomotor stimulatory effects of cocaine in rats maintained on methadone (0, 10, 20, or 30 mg/kg/day, via osmotic minipumps). Chronic methadone elevated baseline locomotion in a dose-dependent manner and did not reduce the direct stimulatory effects of cocaine (5 mg/kg). We then investigated the effects of the highest methadone maintenance dose (30 mg/kg/day) on heroin and cocaine seeking in extinction, and when it was precipitated by exposure to heroin, cocaine, or foot-shock stress in rats trained to self-administer both drugs in the same experimental context (heroin 0.05 mg/kg/inf; cocaine 0.5 mg/kg/inf, eight 3-h sessions each). In tests of reinstatement, rats responded selectively on the appropriate drug-associated lever after priming injections of heroin (0.25 mg/kg) or cocaine (20 mg/kg). Methadone maintenance blocked both cocaine- and heroin-induced reinstatement, but not stress-induced reinstatement, which was not lever selective. These results suggest that although methadone maintenance may not reduce the direct stimulatory effects of cocaine, it has the potential to reduce both spontaneous and cocaine-primed cocaine-seeking behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Leri
- Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
We investigated whether chronic exposure to heroin alters responses to cocaine in ways that might explain the use of cocaine by opioid addicts. To this end, the effects of cocaine (5 and 20 mg/kg) were assessed on locomotor activity of rats chronically exposed to heroin (0.0, 3.5, 7.0, and 14.0 mg/kg/day, over 14 days, via osmotic mini-pumps), or withdrawn from heroin (1 day, acute withdrawal, and 14 days, protracted withdrawal). Chronic heroin exposure, in itself, dose dependently increased locomotion and acute cocaine administration further elevated locomotor activity in a dose-dependent and additive manner. During acute withdrawal, there was a dose-dependent decrease in locomotion that was reversed by cocaine in a dose-dependent manner. During protracted withdrawal, spontaneous locomotion normalized, but rats previously exposed to heroin displayed cross-sensitization to cocaine as indicated by small, but significant, enhanced locomotor response to 5 mg/kg of cocaine, and enhanced intravenous self-administration of low doses of cocaine (0.13 mg/kg/infusion). In a separate study, we measured extracellular dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens (Acb) using in vivo microdialysis before and after acute withdrawal from heroin. During chronic exposure to heroin, basal extracellular DA was elevated dose dependently, whereas in acute withdrawal, levels were not different from those in vehicle-treated rats. In response to cocaine, however, DA activity in the Acb was significantly lower in rats withdrawn from the highest dose of heroin.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The use of cocaine by heroin-dependent individuals, or by patients in methadone or buprenorphine maintenance treatment, is substantial and has negative consequences on health, social adjustment and outcome of opioid-addiction treatment. The pharmacological reasons for cocaine use in opioid-dependent individuals, however, are poorly understood and little is known about the patterns of heroin and cocaine co-use. We reviewed anecdotal evidence suggesting that cocaine is co-used with opioid drugs in a variety of different patterns, to achieve different goals. Clinical and preclinical experimental evidence indicates that the simultaneous administration of cocaine and heroin (i.e. 'speedball') does not induce a novel set of subjective effects, nor is it more reinforcing than either drug alone, especially when the doses of heroin and cocaine are high. There is mixed evidence that the subjective effects of cocaine are enhanced in individuals dependent on opioids, although it is clear that cocaine can alleviate the severity of symptoms of withdrawal from opioids. We also reviewed preclinical studies investigating possible neurobiological interactions between opioids and cocaine, but the results of these studies have been difficult to interpret mainly because the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the motivational effects of cocaine are modified by dependence on, and withdrawal from, opioid drugs. Our analysis encourages further systematic investigation of cocaine use patterns among opioid-dependent individuals and in laboratory animals. Once clearly identified, pharmacological and neuroanatomical methods can be employed in self-administering laboratory animals to uncover the neurobiological correlates of specific patterns of co-use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Leri
- Center for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lutfy K, Maidment NT. Sensitization does not develop to cocaine-induced potentiation of the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Brain Res Bull 2002; 58:7-12. [PMID: 12121806 DOI: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00787-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Repeated intermittent cocaine administration produces a progressive increase (sensitization) in the motor stimulatory action of cocaine. Previous studies have shown that cocaine produces antinociception and also enhances the antinociceptive effect of opioid analgesics. The present study was designed to investigate if sensitization to these effects of cocaine develops. In the first part of the study, we determined if acute cocaine administration (3, 10, 30 mg/kg, intraperitoneal [i.p.]) increases the antinociceptive effect of morphine (5 mg/kg, subcutaneous [s.c.]) in rats using the hot plate test. Cocaine (30 mg/kg, i.p.), alone, produced a small but significant antinociceptive effect at 15 min after drug administration. When administered 15 min prior to morphine, cocaine dose-dependently enhanced the effect of morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) at the time (45 min post-cocaine) when cocaine by itself did not significantly change the hot plate latency. In the second part of the study, we examined if sensitization develops to cocaine-induced antinociception and its ability to increase the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Naïve rats were injected with either saline or cocaine (30 mg/kg) once daily for 3 days and tested on the hot plate apparatus either 24 h or 1 wk after the last cocaine injection. Some of the rats from each group were also tested for motor stimulation induced by cocaine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) 24 h after the hot plate test to confirm that sensitization had occurred to the motor stimulatory action of the drug. Additional rats were treated with saline or cocaine for 3 days, but neither treated with morphine nor tested on the hot plate apparatus, and tested for behavioral sensitization to the motor stimulatory action of cocaine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) 24 h or 1 wk later. Sensitization developed to the motor stimulatory effect of cocaine in both groups, regardless of morphine treatment on the prior day. Sensitization also developed to the antinociceptive effect of cocaine 24 h but not 1 wk after the last cocaine injection. No sensitization was observed in the ability of cocaine to enhance the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Overall, our data suggest that while cocaine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine, sensitization did not develop to this action of cocaine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kabirullah Lutfy
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1579, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The antinociceptive effects of (-)cocaine, (+)cocaine, and cocaine methiodide administered alone and in combination with the mu-opioid agonist morphine were evaluated in rhesus monkeys. The shaved tails of four rhesus monkeys were exposed to warm water (42, 46, 50, and 54 degrees C), and tail-withdrawal latencies (20-s maximum) from each temperature were determined. (-)Cocaine (0.032-1.8 mg/kg, s.c.) produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects and enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine. Neither (+)cocaine nor cocaine methiodide (0.1-10 mg/kg, s.c.) produced antinociception or altered the effects of morphine. Pretreatment with the serotonin receptor antagonist mianserin (0.1-04).32 mg/kg, i.m.) produced dose-dependent rightward shifts in the dose-effect curve for (-)cocaine alone, and attenuated (-)cocaine-induced enhancement of the antinociceptive effects of morphine. However, mianserin (0.32 mg/kg, i.m.) did not alter the antinociceptive effects of morphine alone. These results suggest that in rhesus monkeys, the effects of cocaine on nociception may be stereoselective and centrally mediated. These findings further suggest that the antinociceptive effects of cocaine in primates may be mediated at least in part by cocaine's effects on serotonergic systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M B Gatch
- Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, McLean Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Preston KL, Sullivan JT, Strain EC, Bigelow GE. Enhancement of cocaine's abuse liability in methadone maintenance patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1996; 123:15-25. [PMID: 8741950 DOI: 10.1007/bf02246276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine whether methadone maintenance alters the pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of cocaine. Twenty-two current users of IV cocaine who were not seeking treatment for their illicit cocaine use participated while living on a research unit. Eleven were maintained on methadone 50 mg PO daily as treatment for their opioid abuse; 11 were opioid abusers who were not physically dependent on opioids and who provided opioid-free urines throughout the study. Each subject received acute cocaine challenge doses of 0, 12.5, 25, and 50 mg intravenously in random order under double-blind conditions in separate test sessions. Physiologic and subject-rated responses were measured before injection and for 2 h after. In the methadone maintenance group, cocaine challenge sessions occurred 15.5 h after the daily methadone dose. There were significant differences between the methadone-dependent and nondependent groups: 1) baseline differences related to chronic methadone administration and not associated with cocaine administration (lower respiration rates and pupil diameter; higher skin temperature) and 2) differences in response to cocaine administration; cocaine-induced increases in subject ratings of Drug Effect, Rush, Good Effects, Liking, and Desire for Cocaine and in heart rate were greater in the methadone maintenance patients compared to the non-dependent group. These results indicate that the positive subjective effects and some physiological effects of cocaine are enhanced in methadone-maintained individuals, suggesting a pharmacological basis for the high rates of cocaine abuse among methadone maintenance patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K L Preston
- NIDA Division of Intramural Research, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Derlet RW, Tseng CC, Tharratt RS, Albertson TE. The effect of morphine and naloxone on cocaine toxicity. Am J Med Sci 1992; 303:165-9. [PMID: 1595778 DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199203000-00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The effect of morphine and naloxone on acute cocaine toxicity was studied. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated intraperitoneally (ip) with saline, morphine sulfate 25 mg/kg, or naloxone 1.0 mg/kg 15 minutes prior to challenge by cocaine. After pretreatment, each group was challenged with one of three doses of cocaine (35, 50, or 75 mg/kg ip). Each of the nine drug combinations was tested on at least 10 animals. Animals were observed for behavior, seizures, and death. The animals pretreated with saline and challenged with cocaine (35, 50, or 75 mg/kg) had seizure incidences of 0%, 40%, and 100%, respectively, after increasing doses. Pretreatment with morphine resulted in cocaine-induced seizures of 20%, 80% and 100%, respectively (p less than or equal to 0.05 with cocaine 35 and 50 mg/kg). Time to seizures in these groups did not differ significantly compared to the saline groups. Pretreatment with naloxone resulted in cocaine-induced seizures of 0%, 50%, and 60% (p less than or equal to 0.05 at the 75 mg/kg dose). The incidence of death was significantly increased by pretreatment with morphine in animals that received cocaine 50 or 75 mg/kg. The time to death was not significantly different compared to saline controls. The death rate in naloxone pretreated animals was not significantly different from the saline groups. In additional studies, high-dose naloxone pretreatment (10 mg/kg) also failed to provide protection from acute cocaine toxicity. In conclusion, cocaine toxicity is potentiated by morphine and does not appear to be altered by naloxone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R W Derlet
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento 95817
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shyu BC, Kiritsy-Roy JA, Morrow TJ, Casey KL. Neurophysiological, pharmacological and behavioral evidence for medial thalamic mediation of cocaine-induced dopaminergic analgesia. Brain Res 1992; 572:216-23. [PMID: 1611515 DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90472-l] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
These studies examined the effects of cocaine on thalamic neurons that respond maximally either to noxious or to innocuous somatic stimulation. Cocaine attenuated high intensity electrically-evoked nociceptive responses of all 25 units studied in the parafascicular and central lateral nuclei of the medial thalamus. A dose of 1 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) suppressed medial thalamic unit discharge evoked by both noxious somatic stimulation (49.4 +/- 8.7% of control response) and spinal cord stimulation (76.2 +/- 6.6% of control response). The effect of cocaine on unit responses to noxious somatic stimulation was dose-related in the range of 0.3-3.5 mg/kg i.v. and was attenuated by eticlopride, a D-2 selective dopamine receptor antagonist. Morphine also suppressed noxious somatic evoked responses of medial thalamic units in a dose-dependent manner. Units in the lateral (ventrobasal) thalamus (n = 4) that responded only to innocuous stimuli were not affected by cocaine at doses up to 3.5 mg/kg i.v. Ibotenic acid lesions in the parafascicular nucleus of the medial thalamus attenuated the analgesic effect of cocaine in the formalin test. These results suggest that both cocaine and the parafascicular nucleus interact with dopaminergic mechanisms that attenuate nociceptive spinal projections to the medial thalamus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B C Shyu
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|