Inhibitory effect of epinastine on superoxide generation by rat neutrophils

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a severe allergic eye disease with remodeling changes

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an unusually severe sight-threatening allergic eye disease, occurring mainly in children. Conventional therapy for allergic conjunctivitis is generally not adequate for VKC. Pediatricians and allergists are often not familiar with the severe clinical symptoms and signs of VKC. As untreated VKC can lead to permanent visual loss, pediatric allergists should be aware of the management and therapeutic options for this disease to allow patients to enter clinical remission with the least side effects and sequelae. Children with VKC present with severe ocular symptoms, that is, severe eye itching and irritation, constant tearing, red eye, eye discharge, and photophobia. On examination, giant papillae are frequently observed on the upper tarsal conjunctiva (cobblestoning appearance), with some developing gelatinous infiltrations around the limbus surrounding the cornea (Horner-Trantas dot). Conjunctival injections are mostly severe with thick mucus ropy discharge. Eosinophils are the predominant cells found in the tears and eye discharge. Common therapies include topical antihistamines and dual-acting agents, such as lodoxamide and olopatadine. These are infrequently sufficient and topical corticosteroids are often required for the treatment of flare ups. Ocular surface remodeling leads to severe suffering and complications, such as corneal ulcers/scars. Other complications include side effects from chronic topical steroids use, such as increased intraocular pressure, glaucoma, cataract and infections. Alternative therapies for VKC include immunomodulators, such as cyclosporine A and tacrolimus. Surgery is reserved for those with complications and should be handled by ophthalmologists with special expertise. Newer research on the pathogenesis of VKC is reviewed in this article. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis is a very important allergic eye disease in children. Complications and remodeling changes are unique and can lead to blindness. Understanding of pathogenesis of VKC may lead to better therapy for these unfortunate patients.

Opposite effect of mast cell stabilizers ketotifen and tranilast on the vasoconstrictor response to electrical field stimulation in rat mesenteric artery

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed whether mast cell stabilization by either ketotifen or tranilast could alter either sympathetic or nitrergic innervation function in rat mesenteric arteries.

METHODS

Electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contraction was analyzed in mesenteric segments from 6-month-old Wistar rats in three experimental groups: control, 3-hour ketotifen incubated (0.1 αmol/L), and 3-hour tranilast incubated (0.1 mmol/L). To assess the possible participation of nitrergic or sympathetic innervation, EFS contraction was analyzed in the presence of non-selective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME (0.1 mmol/L), α-adrenergic receptor antagonist phentolamine (0.1 µmol/L), or the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, 1.46 mmol/L). Nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide anion (O2.(-) levels were measured, as were vasomotor responses to noradrenaline (NA) and to NO donor DEA-NO, in the presence and absence of 0.1 mmol/L tempol. Phosphorylated neuronal NOS (P-nNOS) expression was also analyzed.

RESULTS

EFS-induced contraction was increased by ketotifen and decreased by tranilast. L-NAME increased the vasoconstrictor response to EFS only in control segments. The vasodilator response to DEA-NO was higher in ketotifen- and tranilast-incubated segments, while tempol increased vasodilator response to DEA-NO only in control segments. Both NO and O2(-) release, and P-nNOS expression were diminished by ketotifen and by tranilast treatment. The decrease in EFS-induced contraction produced by phentolamine was lower in tranilast-incubated segments. NA vasomotor response was decreased only by tranilast. The remnant vasoconstriction observed in control and ketotifen-incubated segments was abolished by 6-OHDA.

CONCLUSION

While both ketotifen and tranilast diminish nitrergic innervation function, only tranilast diminishes sympathetic innnervation function, thus they alter the vasoconstrictor response to EFS in opposing manners.

Effect of epinastine hydrochloride on murine self-scratching behavior after skin-scratching stimulation

The itch-scratch cycle aggravates chronic inflammatory skin diseases. We have previously reported that mice begin to scratch themselves within several minutes after skin-scratching stimulation. This is associated with an increase in release of substance P (SP) from sensory nerve fibers in the skin, and the self-scratching behavior is suppressed by neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) antagonist. Thus, SP may play a pivotal role in self-scratching behavior. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of second-generation histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists on self-scratching behavior in mice. After oral administration of epinastine hydrochloride (epinastine) (total dose 50 +/- 5 mg/kg for 7 days) or the vehicle only to ICR mice for 7 days, skin-scratching stimulation was administered to the dorsal skin for 10 min. Self-scratching behavior was recorded by video camera for 10 min. Twenty-four hours later, skin tissue was harvested and stained with toluidine blue. Immunohistochemical staining for SP was performed, and SP and nerve growth factor (NGF) concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Self-scratching behavior, mast cell degranulation, and NGF concentration decreased, and the length of SP-positive nerve fibers and SP concentrations increased significantly in the epinastine-treated group, when compared with the vehicle control group. We conclude that epinastine inhibits mast cell degranulation by attenuating SP release from sensory nerve fibers, which results in inhibition of self-scratching behavior. These results suggest that second-generation histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists might efficaciously control itch-scratch cycle-related skin diseases.

Antiallergic drugs, azelastine hydrochloride and epinastine hydrochloride, inhibit ongoing IgE secretion of rat IgE-producing hybridoma FE-3 cells

We asked whether or not antiallergic drugs, azelastine hydrochloride and epinastine hydrochloride, inhibit IgE secretion from IgE-producing hybridoma FE-3 cells. FE-3 cells were cultured in the presence of azelastine or epinastine for 24 h, washed in phosphate-buffered saline , and then recultured in the medium in the absence of the antiallergic drugs. IgE levels in the cultured medium as well as those in the cytoplasm of FE-3 cells were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. mRNA levels of Cepsilon, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), XBP-1, and Bip were estimated by northern blot or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. The activities of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) were analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Phosphorylation of I kappa B alpha (IkappaBalpha) was analyzed by immunoprecipitation followed by western blot analysis. IgE levels in the cultured medium and in the microsome fraction were lower on the treatment with 10(-5) M azelastine or epinastine than those on the treatment with vehicle. Cepsilon and AID mRNA levels were lower on the treatment with 10(-5) M azelastine than those on the treatment with vehicle, but were not decreased on the treatment with 10(-5) M epinastine. XBP-1 and Bip mRNA levels were not altered following treatment of the antiallergic drugs. Azelastine at 10(-5) M, but not epinastine, reduced DNA binding activity of NF-kappaB and also diminished IkappaBalpha phosphorylation, leading to sustaining IkappaBalpha protein levels. These findings suggest that azelastine exerts its inhibitory effect on the IgE secretion from FE-3 cells through the inhibition of Cepsilon mRNA expression, and that the inhibitory effect of epinastine is, at least in part, due to suppression of IgE synthesis at the post-transcriptional level.

Caffeic Acid Inhibits Compound 48/80-Induced Allergic Symptoms in Mice

The effect of caffeic acid on scratching behavior and vascular permeability changes induced by compound 48/80 in ICR mice were investigated. An oral dose of 500 mg/kg of caffeic acid significantly inhibited scratching behavior and vascular permeability induced by compound 48/80. The inhibitory effects of daily administration of lower doses of caffeic acid, 100 and 200 mg/kg, were also investigated; and it was found that 200 mg/kg significantly inhibited compound 48/80-induced scratching behavior after the second week of consecutive administration. The effect of 200 mg/kg of caffeic acid on scratching behavior was observed up to the third week of the treatment. The decrease in histamine content induced by compound 48/80 was significantly antagonized by 200 mg/kg. The findings suggest that caffeic acid may be effective for treating itch and edema in allergic dermatitis.

Effect of Lo Han Kuo (Siraitia grosvenori Swingle) on nasal rubbing and scratching behavior in ICR mice

We studied the effect of Lo Han Kuo (Siraitia grosvenori Swingle) on histamine-induced nasal rubbing and compound 48/80-induced skin scratching behavior in ICR mice. An extract and glycoside (a complex of sweet components) of Lo Han Kuo were used in the study. Both the extract and glycoside caused no significant effect on nasal rubbing or scratching behavior, even at a dose of 1000 mg/kg when administered in a single dose. However, the effect of Lo Han Kuo became clear after repeated administration, and 300 and 1000 mg/kg of both extract and glycoside significantly inhibited nasal rubbing and skin scratching behavior after consecutive treatment for 4 weeks. Both the extract and glycoside inhibited the histamine release induced by compound 48/80 at concentrations of 300 and 1000 microg/ml. From these results, it is assumed that the inhibition of nasal rubbing and skin scratching behavior induced by Lo Han Kuo occurs through a mast cell-dependent mechanism.

Efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine: a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, active- and vehicle-controlled environmental trial in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

BACKGROUND

Epinastine hydrochloride is an antihistamine with mast cell-stabilizing and anti-inflammatory activity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) exposed to environmental allergens.

METHODS

This randomized (age-stratified), double-masked, parallel-group, active- and vehicle-controlled, environmental, Phase III clinical trial was conducted at 6 ophthalmology clinics in the United States. Patients aged >or=9 years diagnosed with SAC and who had a positive reaction in a conjunctival allergen challenge were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive 1 drop/eye BID of epinastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution, levocabastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic suspension, or vehicle of epinastine, respectively, for 8 weeks. The primary end point was ocular itching, and secondary end points included ocular hyperemia, chemosis, ocular mucous discharge (all assessed on a 5-point scale), eyelid swelling (assessed on a 4-point scale), and tearing (present or absent). Efficacy analyses used assessments from the two 1-week periods with the highest pollen counts. For tolerability assessment slit-lamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity examinations were conducted at each study visit (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8).

RESULTS

Two-hundred ninety-eight patients (159 females, 139 males; mean [SD] age, 32.7 [14.6] years [range, 9-71 years]) entered the study; 118 received epinastine, 118 received levocabastine, and 62 received vehicle. Epinastine-treated patients reported significantly less ocular itching than those receiving vehicle (P=0.045); scores for hyperemia were similar between these 2 groups. Ocular itching and hyperemia scores were similar between the epinastine and levocabastine groups. No clinically or statistically significant between-group differences were seen in slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings, changes in visual acuity from baseline, or the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with SAC, ophthalmic epinastine instilled twice daily was more effective than vehicle for the control of ocular itching and was similar in efficacy to levocabastine for control of ocular itching and hyperemia. Epinastine was well tolerated.

Antihistamines in late-phase clinical development for allergic disease

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health concern and shares a high comorbidity with asthma. Recent research suggests that different allergic diseases, such as AR, asthma, allergic conjunctivitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), are evoked by common pathological mechanisms characterised by the release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators. Although H(1) receptor antagonists are the mainstay of therapy for allergic disease, the unacceptably high incidence of anticholinergic and CNS-related side effects of first-generation H(1) antagonists led to the search for improved second-generation H(1) antagonists. While many of these agents were largely devoid of CNS side effects, their tendency for drug-drug interactions (e.g., terfenadine and astemizole) resulted in an increased incidence of cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, second-generation H(1) antagonists exhibited weak anti-inflammatory properties and had no effect on nasal congestion. These observations emphasised the need for newer anti-allergic agents with a broader spectrum of activity and an improved safety profile. Among the newer H(1) antagonists currently in clinical development, desloratadine and mizolastine are the most widely studied. Both have a rapid onset of action, and desloratadine has demonstrated clinical efficacy in AR, CIU and seasonal asthma. Desloratadine has several advantages over other H(1) antagonists in that it has proven decongestant activity, a sparing effect on the use of bronchodilators (beta(2)-agonists) and a low potential for drug interactions. The broad anti-inflammatory properties of desloratadine and mizolastine, which distinguish these agents from other H(1) antagonists in clinical development (e.g., norastemizole and levocetirizine), suggest they may have a more profound impact on the underlying disease in patients suffering from different forms of allergy. The lack of clinical efficacy and safety data on rupatadine and HSR-609, both novel H(1) antagonists, precludes an accurate assessment of their potential for treating allergic disease. Epinastine and efletirizine are being developed exclusively for topical application and are unlikely to play a significant role in the management of allergic diseases as a whole.

New insights into the second generation antihistamines

Second generation antihistamines are recognised as being highly effective treatments for allergy-based disease and are among the most frequently prescribed and safest drugs in the world. However, consideration of the therapeutic index or the benefit/risk ratio of the H1 receptor antagonists is of paramount importance when prescribing this class of compounds as they are used to treat non-life threatening conditions. There are many second generation antihistamines available and at first examination these appear to be comparable in terms of safety and efficacy. However, the newer antihistamines in fact represent a heterogeneous group of compounds, having markedly differing chemical structures, adverse effects, half-life, tissue distribution and metabolism, spectrum of antihistaminic properties, and varying degrees of anti-inflammatory effects. With regard to the latter, there is growing awareness that some of these compounds might represent useful adjunct medications in asthma therapy. In terms of safety issues, the current second generation grouping includes compounds with proven cardiotoxic effects and others with the potential for adverse drug interactions. Moreover, some of the second generation H1 antagonists have given cause for concern regarding their potential to cause a degree of somnolence in some individuals. It can be argued, therefore, that the present second generation grouping is too large and indistinct since this was based primarily on the concept of separating the first generation sedating compounds from nonsedating H1 antagonists. Although it is too early to talk about a third generation grouping of antihistamines, future membership of such a classification could be based on a low volume of distribution coupled with a lack of sedating effects, drug interactions and cardiotoxicity.

Effects of tannins and related polyphenols on superoxide-induced histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells

The effects of tannins and related polyphenols on KO2- and compound 48/80-induced histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells were examined. Pretreatment with hydrolyzable tannins (1-100 microM) significantly inhibited KO2-induced histamine release. Dimeric ellagitannins, which have hexahydroxydiphenoyl (HHDP) and valoneoyl residues and/or a valoneoyl-related acyl unit in the molecule, showed more potent inhibitory effects than monomeric hydrolyzable tannins. The most effective inhibition was exhibited by agrimoniin and euphorbin C (IC50 0.68 and 0.80 microM), which have dehydrodigalloyl and euphorbinoyl groups, respectively, as well as the HHDP group. However, procyanidins, flavonoids and related polyphenols with small molecular weights, except for epigallocatechin gallate, exhibited negligible effects. Although clinically used antiallergic drugs, azelastine, astemizole, ketotifen and epinastine have been shown to prevent KO2-induced histamine release, their potencies were all less than those of ellagitannins. An inhibitory effect on compound 48/80-induced histamine release was also exhibited by higher molecular weight tannins. The inhibitory effect on histamine release caused by different stimulants suggested that ellagitannins act as cell membrane stabilizers as well as radical scavengers.

Effects of epinastine hydrochloride on cholinergic neuro-effector transmission in canine tracheal smooth muscle

We determined the effects of epinastine hydrochloride, an anti-asthmatic drug, on cholinergic neuro-effector transmission in canine trachea. Isometric tension of tracheal strips was measured in the presence of indomethacin and propranolol. Epinastine (10(-6) M) significantly suppressed the contraction evoked by electrical field stimulation, but had no effect on the acetylcholine-evoked contraction. An L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, nicardipine, did not suppress the electrical field stimulation-induced smooth muscle contraction and did not alter the inhibitory effect of epinastine. An N-type Ca2+ channel blocker, omega-conotoxin, suppressed the electrical field stimulation-induced contraction in a dose-dependent manner, and in a subthreshold/intermediate concentration abolished the inhibitory effect of epinastine. These findings indicate that epinastine exerts prejunctional inhibitory effects on airway smooth muscle of dogs, presumably by inhibiting acetylcholine release from vagal nerve terminals, and suggest that this effect is mediated by N-type Ca2+ channels.

Characterization of antihistamines using biphasic cutaneous reaction in BALB/c mice

Effects of 11 histamine H1 receptor antagonists on IgE-mediated biphasic cutaneous reaction in mice were examined. The immediate phase reaction (IPR) assessed at 1 hour after antigen application was significantly inhibited by all antihistamines examined. The inhibition of IPR by cetirizine and mequitazine were potent, but those by cyproheptadine and diphenhydramine were weak. The later phase reaction (LPR) assessed at 24 hours after antigen application was inhibited by chlorpheniramine, oxatomide, ketotifen, mequitazine, emedastine, terfenadine and azelastine. The inhibition of LPR by emedastine was potent, but those by ketotifen and terfenadine were only partial. Emedastine inhibited both IPR and LPR comparably. Present results indicate that H1 receptor activation is involved in the IPR of the biphasic cutaneous reaction, and that the blockade of H1 receptors at IPR does not contribute to the attenuation of following LPR. Histamine H1 receptor antagonists inhibiting the LPR have a property distinct from H1 receptor antagonism, which may have an additional benefit for the treatment of allergic diseases.