Endothelin ETA and ETB receptors mediate endothelin-1-induced apamin-sensitive relaxation in the guinea pig ileum

Actions of endothelin and corticotropin releasing factor in the guinea-pig ileum: no evidence for an interaction with capsaicin-sensitive neurons

Both endothelins and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) appear in capsaicin-sensitive neurons. We have investigated the effects of human endothelin-1 (ET-1) and CRF in the guinea-pig ileum longitudinal and circular preparations and sought for ways of specific antagonism. With the aid of tachyphylaxis to capsaicin (i.e., rendering capsaicin-sensitive neurons functionally impaired) it was tested if these neurons played a mediating role in the effects of ET-1 or CRF. We also tried to find out whether endogenous endothelin or CRF plays a role in the excitatory and inhibitory effects of capsaicin in the ileum. In preparations at basal tone, both exogenous ET-1 (1-100 nM) and CRF (3-100 nM) caused contraction. These responses were not influenced by capsaicin tachyphylaxis. The contractile effect of ET-1 was not affected by tetrodotoxin (1 microM), atropine (1 microM), methysergide (100 nM), chloropyramine (100 nM) or SR140333 (100 nM) but was significantly inhibited or even abolished by the receptor antagonist BQ123 (3 microM) or BQ788 (3 microM). CRF caused contraction that was fully sensitive to tetrodotoxin (1 microM), tachyphylaxis to CRF or to atropine (1 microM) plus the tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist SR140333 (200 nM). Atropine alone had a weak inhibitory effect on the contractile action of CRF. Neither the antagonist BQ123 (3 microM) nor CRF tachyphylaxis inhibited the contractile action of capsaicin (2 microM), even in the presence of a mixture of GR82334 (3 microM) and SR142801 (100 nM), for blocking tachykinin NK1 and NK3 receptors, respectively--a treatment that by itself significantly reduced the effect of capsaicin. Exogenous ET-1 (0.3-5 nM), but not CRF (30-100 nM), caused relaxation of the atropine-treated, histamine-precontracted ileum. This effect of ET-1 was significantly inhibited or abolished by BQ123 (10 microM), or BQ788 (3 microM), but was not influenced by capsaicin tachyphylaxis. Likewise, relaxation of the atropine-treated, histamine-precontracted ileum in response to capsaicin was not influenced by the endothelin receptor antagonist BQ788 (3 microM) or BQ788 (3 microM) plus BQ123 (3 microM). Apamin (300 nM) was also without effect on the capsaicin-induced relaxation. In circular muscle strips ET-1 inhibited the indomethacin-induced spontaneous activity. This effect was abolished by BQ123 (3 microM) or BQ788 (3 microM). CRF caused a stimulation of the circular muscle. This stimulatory effect was not influenced by atropine (1 microM) alone, but was inhibited by atropine plus tachykinin NK1 and NK2 receptor antagonists (SR140333 (200 nM) and SR48968 (200 nM)) and also by tetrodotoxin (1 microM). It is concluded that capsaicin-sensitive neurons do not play a role in the effects of exogenous ET-1 or CRF in the guinea-pig ileum. ET-1 can both contract and relax the ileal longitudinal smooth muscle directly, probably via both ETA and ETB receptors. CRF acts by specifically stimulating excitatory (but not inhibitory) neurons of the myenteric plexus. Neither endogenous ET-1 nor CRF seems to play a role in the excitatory or inhibitory effects of capsaicin.

Regulation of guinea pig intestinal peristalsis by endogenous endothelin acting at ET(B) receptors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endothelins are expressed in many enteric neurons of the gut. Because activation of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors is known to alter intestinal muscle activity, the effect of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor agonists and antagonists on propulsive peristalsis was examined.

METHODS

Repetitive peristalsis in fluid-perfused segments of the guinea pig isolated small intestine was elicited by a rise of the intraluminal pressure and recorded via the pressure changes generated by the peristaltic waves.

RESULTS

Endothelin 1 (0.3-10 nmol/L added to the organ bath) stimulated peristalsis as shown by a decrease in the pressure threshold at which peristaltic waves were triggered, whereas the endothelin analog sarafotoxin 6c (0.3-10 nmol/L) inhibited peristalsis as reflected by an increase in the pressure threshold. The ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ-123 (3 micromol/L) converted the properistaltic action of endothelin 1 to an antiperistaltic action, whereas the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (3 micromol/L) prevented the antiperistaltic action of sarafotoxin 6c. BQ-788, but not BQ-123, facilitated peristalsis on its own. Additional experiments indicated that the properistaltic action of endothelin 1 is mediated by enteric neurons, whereas the peristaltic motor effects of sarafotoxin 6c and BQ-788 are caused by a direct action on the muscle.

CONCLUSIONS

ET(A) receptor activation stimulates, whereas ET(B) receptor activation inhibits, intestinal peristalsis. The ability of BQ-788 to facilitate peristalsis per se points to a physiologic role of ET(B) receptors in peristaltic motor regulation.

Effects of endothelin ET(B) receptor agonists and antagonists on the biphasic response in the ileum

In the guinea-pig ileum, both sarafotoxin S6c and IRL1620 (Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]endothelin-1-(8-21) induced a concentration-dependent biphasic effect (relaxation and contraction), but distinct tachyphylaxis of the tissue. Cross-tachyphylaxis and additivity experiments evidenced distinct receptors for these agonists. BQ-123 (cyclo[D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]), an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, did not affect the response induced by either agonist. PD145065 [Ac-(D-Bhg-Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp) (D-Bhg = 5H-dibenzyl[a,d]cycloheptene-10,11-dihydroglycine)], an endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, inhibited the contractions induced by IRL1620 and sarafotoxin S6c in competitive and noncompetitive manner, respectively. RES-701-1 [cyclic(Gly1-Asp9)(Gly-Asn-Trp-His-Gly-Thr-Ala-Pro-Asp-Trp-P he-Phe-Asn-Tyr-Tyr-Trp)], an endothelin ET(B1) receptor antagonist, inhibited both components of the response induced by IRL1620, whereas it inhibited mainly the relaxation induced by low sarafotoxin S6c doses. Apamin and suramin had different effects towards the agonists. Our results suggest that two endothelin ET(B) receptors with distinct signal transduction mechanism mediate the biphasic response: (1) the endothelin ET(B1) receptor: sensitive to RES-701-1 and PD145065 and (2) the endothelin ET(B2) receptor: less sensitive to RES-701-1 and PD145065.

Pharmacological characterization of endothelin-induced contraction in the guinea-pig oesophageal muscularis mucosae

1. In the oesophageal muscularis mucosae, we examined the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelin-2 (ET-2), endothelin-3 (ET-3) and sarafotoxin S6c (SX6c) as agonists, and FR139317, BQ-123 and RES-701-1 as endothelin receptor antagonists. 2. All of the endothelins produced tonic contractions which were frequently superimposed on rhythmic motility in a concentration-dependent manner. The order of potency (-log EC50) was ET-1 (8.61)=SX6c (8.65)>ET-2 (8.40)>ET-3 (8.18). 3. FR139317 (1-3 microM) and BQ-123 (1 microM) caused parallel rightward shifts of the concentration-response curve to ET-1, but at higher concentrations caused no further shift. RES-701-1 (3 microM) caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to ET-1, while RES-701-1 (10 microM) had no additional effect. RES-701-1 (0.1-1 microM) concentration-dependently caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to SX6c. The contraction to ET-1 (10 nM) in preparations desensitized to the actions of SX6c was greatly inhibited by pretreatment with FR139317 (10 microM). 4. Modulation of the Ca2+ concentration in the Krebs solution caused the concentration-response curve to ET-1 or SX6c to shift to the right and downward as external Ca2+ concentrations decreased. Verapamil (30 microM) abolished rhythmic motility induced by ET-1 or SX6c. Ni2+ (0.1 mM) weakly inhibited ET-1- or SX6c-induced tonic contraction. SK&F 96365 (60 microM) completely inhibited ET-1-induced contractions. 5. We conclude that there are two types of ET-receptors, excitatory ET(A)- and ET(B)-receptors in the oesophageal muscularis mucosae. These receptors mediate tonic contractions predominantly by opening receptor-operated Ca2+ channels (ROCs) and partly by opening T-type Ca2+ channels, and mediate rhythmic motility by opening L-type Ca2+ channels.