Pharmacological Significance of the Blocking Action of the Intravenous General Anesthetic Propofol on the Slow Component of Cardiac Delayed Rectifier K+ Current

Comparison of the effects of propofol and alfaxalone on the electrocardiogram of dogs, with particular reference to QT interval

Cardiac electrical activity is often altered by administration of anesthetic drugs. While the effects of propofol in this regard have previously been described in dogs, to date, there are no reports of the effect of alfaxalone. This study investigated the impact of both propofol and alfaxalone on the ECG of 60 dogs, after premedication with acepromazine and methadone. Heart rate increased significantly in both groups. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly increased following propofol while with alfaxalone the QRS duration was significantly increased and ST segment depression was observed. The QT and JT interval were significantly shorter following induction with alfaxalone, but, when corrected (c) for heart rate, QTc and JTc in both groups were significantly greater following induction. When comparing the magnitude of change between groups, the change in RR interval was greater in the alfaxalone group. The change in both QT and JT intervals were significantly greater following alfaxalone, but when QTc and JTc intervals were compared, there were no significant differences between the two drugs. The similarly increased QTc produced by both drugs may suggest comparable proarrhythmic effects.

Prediction of anesthetic torsadogenicity using a human ventricular cell model

This simulation study was designed to predict the torsadogenicity of sevoflurane and propofol in healthy control, as well as type 1 and type 2 long QT syndrome (LQT1 and LQT2, respectively), using the O'Hara-Rudy dynamic model. LQT1 and LQT2 models were simulated by decreasing the conductances of slowly and rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ currents (IKs and IKr, respectively) by 50%, respectively. Action potential duration at 50% repolarization level (APD50) and diastolic intracellular Ca2+ concentration were measured in epicardial cell during administration of sevoflurane (1 ~ 5%) and propofol (1 ~ 10 μM). Torsadogenicity can be predicted from the relationship between APD50 and diastolic intracellular Ca2+ concentration, which is classified by the decision boundary. Whereas the relationships in control and LQT1 models were distributed on nontorsadogenic side in the presence of sevoflurane at all tested concentrations, those in LQT2 models were shifted to torsadogenic side by concentrations of ≥ 2%. In all three models, propofol shifted the relationships in a direction away from the decision boundary on nontorsadogenic side. Our findings suggest that sevoflurane, but not propofol, exerts torsadogenicity in patients with reduced IKr, such as LQT2 patients. Caution should be paid to the occurrence of arrhythmia during sevoflurane anesthesia in patients with reduced IKr.

Propofol in ICU Settings: Understanding and Managing Anti-Arrhythmic, Pro-Arrhythmic Effects, and Propofol Infusion Syndrome

Propofol has revolutionized anesthesia and intensive care medicine owing to its favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, fast onset, and short duration of action. This drug has been shown to be remarkably effective in numerous clinical scenarios. In addition, propofol has maintained an overwhelmingly favorable safety profile; however, it has been associated with both antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects. This review concisely summarizes the dual arrhythmic cardiovascular effects of propofol and a rare but serious complication, propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS). We also discuss the need for careful patient evaluation, compliance with recommended infusion rates, and vigilant monitoring.

Elevation of propofol sensitivity of cardiac IKs channel by KCNE1 polymorphism D85N

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The slowly activating delayed rectifier K⁺ channel (I_Ks ), composed of pore-forming KCNQ1 α-subunits and ancillary KCNE1 β-subunits, regulates ventricular repolarization in human heart. Propofol, at clinically used concentrations, modestly inhibits the intact (wild-type) I_Ks channels and is therefore unlikely to appreciably prolong QT interval in ECG during anaesthesia. However, little information is available concerning the inhibitory effect of propofol on I_Ks channel associated with its gene variants implicated in QT prolongation. The KCNE1 single nucleotide polymorphism leading to D85N is associated with drug-induced QT prolongation and therefore regarded as a clinically important genetic variant. This study examined whether KCNE1-D85N affects the sensitivity of I_Ks to inhibition by propofol.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Whole-cell patch-clamp and immunostaining experiments were conducted in HEK293 cells and/or mouse cardiomyocyte-derived HL-1 cells, transfected with wild-type KCNQ1, wild-type or variant KCNE1 cDNAs.

KEY RESULTS

Propofol inhibited KCNQ1/KCNE1-D85N current more potently than KCNQ1/KCNE1 current in HEK293 cells and HL-1 cells. Immunostaining experiments in HEK293 cells revealed that pretreatment with propofol (10 μM) did not appreciably affect cell membrane expression of KCNQ1 and KCNE1 proteins in KCNQ1/KCNE1 and KCNQ1/KCNE1-D85N channels.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The KCNE1 polymorphism D85N significantly elevates the sensitivity of I_Ks to inhibition by propofol. This study detects a functionally important role of KCNE1-D85N polymorphism in conferring genetic susceptibility to propofol-induced QT prolongation and further suggests the possibility that the inhibitory action of anaesthetics on ionic currents becomes exaggerated in patients carrying variants in genes encoding ion channels.

An Overview of Analytical Methods for the Estimation of Propofol in Pharmaceutical Formulations, Biological Matrices, and Hair Marker

Propofol (PFL) owing to its excellent inhibitory property of neurotransmitters in CNS by positive modulation of ligand gated ion channels to an integrated chloride channeled GABA_A thereby acts as a general anesthetic. It differs from other general anesthetics chemically and pharmacologically as it has lesser side effects compared to other general anesthetics and is most commonly used. The present review focuses on two aspects (a) various analytical methods used in quantification of Propofol in pharmaceutical formulations and (b) various analytical methods used to determine Propofol in biological matrices and some biological markers like hair and end tidal nasal air for forensic purpose to estimate drug concentration in suspected cases. Here the various analytical methods are developed using different parameters and validation of employed methods are discussed. Estimated parameters like the linearity, LOQ (Limit of quantification), % recovery, slope, intercept, validation are discussed for the individual method. The critical quality attributes like the wavelength of detection, columns, flow rate, gas flow, and the sample preparation methods for the determination of PFL by bioanalytical methods are also discussed. Type of electrode, mechanism involved and the potential voltage applied for a particular electrochemical method are also discussed.

Effects of HCN Channels in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Contribute to the Cardiovascular Effects of Propofol

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels were reported to express in the well-known vasomotor region, rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), and can be inhibited by propofol. However, whether HCN channels in RVLM contribute to propofol-induced cardiovascular depression remains unclear. We recorded the hemodynamic changes when either continuous intravenous infusions or microinjections of propofol and ZD-7288 (4-ethylphenylamino-1,2-dimethyl-6-methylaminopyrimidinium chloride; HCN channel blocker) in RVLM. Expressions of HCN channels in RVLM neurons of mice of different ages were examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. The effects of propofol and ZD-7288 on HCN channels and the excitability of RVLM neurons were examined by electrophysiological recording. Propofol (1.25, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg/kg per minute, i.v., 10 minutes) decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in a concentration-dependent manner in wild-type mice that were markedly attenuated in HCN1 knockout mice. Bilateral microinjection of propofol (1%, 0.1 μl) in RVLM caused a sharp and pronounced drop in MAP and HR values, which were abated by pretreatment with ZD-7288. In electrophysiological recording, propofol (5, 10, and 20 μM) concentration-dependently inhibited HCN current, increased input resistance, decreased firing rate, and caused membrane hyperpolarization in RVLM neurons. These actions of propofol were attenuated by ZD-7288 pretreatment. The mRNA and protein level of HCN channels increased in an age-dependent manner, which may contribute to the age-dependent increase in the sensitivity to propofol. Our results indicated that the inhibition of HCN channels in RVLM neurons may contribute to propofol-induced cardiovascular inhibition.

The effects of intravenous anesthetics on QT interval during anesthetic induction with desflurane

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the effects of the interaction between intravenous anesthetics and desflurane on the QT interval.

Methods

Fifty patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery were included. The patients received 3 μg/kg fentanyl and were randomly divided into two groups: group P patients received 1.5 mg/kg propofol and group T patients received 5 mg/kg thiamylal 2 min after fentanyl injection. All patients received rocuronium and desflurane (6% inhaled concentration) after loss of consciousness. Tracheal intubation was performed 3 min after rocuronium injection. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), bispectral index score (BIS), and the heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval on a 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded before fentanyl injection (T1), 2 min after fentanyl injection (T2), 1 min after propofol or thiamylal injection (T3), immediately before intubation (T4), and 2 min after intubation (T5).

Results

There were no significant intergroup differences in patient characteristics. BIS and MAP decreased after anesthesia induction in both groups. MAP values at T3, T4, and T5 in group T were higher than those in group P. HR did not change over time or differ between the groups. The QTc intervals at T4 and T5 in group T were longer than those at T1. In group P, the QTc interval at T3 was significantly shorter than that at T1. The QTc intervals at T3, T4, and T5 in group T were significantly longer than those in group P.

Conclusions

A propofol injection could counteract the QTc interval prolongation during desflurane anesthesia induction.

Trial registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry database reference number: UMIN000023707. This study was registered on August 21, 2016.

Propofol inhibits hERG K+ channels and enhances the inhibition effects on its mutations in HEK293 cells

QT interval prolongation, a potential risk for arrhythmias, may result from gene polymorphisms relevant to cardiomyocyte repolarization. Another noted cause of QT interval prolongation is the administration of chemical compounds such as anesthetics, which may affect a specific type of cardiac K⁺ channel encoded by the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG). hERG K⁺ current was recorded using whole-cell patch clamp in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells expressing wild type (WT) or mutated hERG channels. Expression of hERG K⁺ channel proteins was evaluated using western blot and confirmed by fluorescent staining and imaging. Computational modeling was adopted to identify the possible binding site(s) of propofol with hERG K⁺ channels. Propofol had a significant inhibitory effect on WT hERG K⁺ currents in a concentration-dependent manner, with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of 60.9±6.4μM. Mutations in drug-binding sites (Y652A or F656C) of the hERG channel were found to attenuate hERG current blockage by propofol. However, propofol did not inhibit the trafficking of hERG protein to the cell membrane. Meanwhile, for the three selective hERG K⁺ channel mutant heterozygotes WT/Q738X-hERG, WT/A422T-hERG, and WT/H562P-hERG, the IC₅₀ of propofol was calculated as 14.2±2.8μM, 3.3±1.2μM, and 5.9±1.9μM, respectively, which were much lower than that for the wild type. These findings indicate that propofol may potentially increase QT interval prolongation risk in patients via direct inhibition of the hERG K⁺ channel, especially in those with other concurrent triggering factors such as hERG gene mutations.

Propofol-induced Inhibition of Catecholamine Release Is Reversed by Maintaining Calcium Influx

BACKGROUND

Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is one of the most frequently used anesthetic agents. One of the main side effects of propofol is to reduce blood pressure, which is thought to occur by inhibiting the release of catecholamines from sympathetic neurons. Here, the authors hypothesized that propofol-induced hypotension is not simply the result of suppression of the release mechanisms for catecholamines.

METHODS

The authors simultaneously compared the effects of propofol on the release of norepinephrine triggered by high K-induced depolarization, as well as ionomycin, by using neuroendocrine PC12 cells and synaptosomes. Ionomycin, a Ca ionophore, directly induces Ca influx, thus bypassing the effect of ion channel modulation by propofol.

RESULTS

Propofol decreased depolarization (high K)-triggered norepinephrine release, whereas it increased ionomycin-triggered release from both PC12 cells and synaptosomes. The propofol (30 μM)-induced increase in norepinephrine release triggered by ionomycin was dependent on both the presence and the concentration of extracellular Ca (0.3 to 10 mM; n = 6). The enhancement of norepinephrine release by propofol was observed in all tested concentrations of ionomycin (0.1 to 5 μM; n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol at clinically relevant concentrations promotes the catecholamine release as long as Ca influx is supported. This unexpected finding will allow for a better understanding in preventing propofol-induced hypotension.

Intravenous Anesthetic Propofol Inhibits Multiple Human Cardiac Potassium Channels

Background:

Propofol is widely used clinically for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Clinical case reports have shown that propofol has an antiatrial tachycardia/fibrillation effect; however, the related ionic mechanisms are not fully understood. The current study investigates the effects of propofol on human cardiac potassium channels.

Methods:

The whole cell patch voltage clamp technique was used to record transient outward potassium current (Ito) and ultrarapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKur) in human atrial myocytes and hKv1.5, human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG), and hKCNQ1/hKCNE1 channels stably expressed in HEK 293 cells. Current clamp mode was used to record action potentials in human atrial myocytes.

Results:

In human atrial myocytes, propofol inhibited Ito in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50 = 33.5 ± 2.0 μM for peak current, n = 6) by blocking open channels without affecting the voltage-dependent kinetics or the recovery time constant; propofol decreased IKur (IC50 = 35.3 ± 1.9 μM, n = 6) in human atrial myocytes and inhibited hKv1.5 current expressed in HEK 293 cells by preferentially binding to the open channels. Action potential duration at 90% repolarization was slightly prolonged by 30 μM propofol in human atrial myocytes. In addition, propofol also suppressed hERG and hKCNQ1/hKCNE1 channels expressed in HEK 293 cells.

Conclusion:

Propofol inhibits multiple human cardiac potassium channels, including human atrial Ito and IKur, as well as hKv1.5, hERG, and hKCNQ1/hKCNE1 channels stably expressed in HEK 293 cells, and slightly prolongs human atrial action potential duration, which may contribute to the antiatrial tachycardia/fibrillation effects observed in patients who receive propofol.

[Cardiac arrest secondary to pacemaker dysfunction during general anesthesia in a young adult patient]

The number of patients with cardiac pacemaker is continuously increasing. The anesthetic management of these patients is often trivialized, particularly during minor surgery. However there is always a potential risk of dysfunction during anesthesia. Perioperative management of these patients must be careful and standardized to avoid accidents. We report a case of cardiac arrest during general anesthesia for a day-surgery secondary to pacemaker dysfunction by increasing pacing thresholds in a young adult patient. Rapid onset after induction, without any surgical stimulation, has raised the question of the involvement of anesthetic drugs like propofol.

Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on QT interval during anesthetic induction

There have been conflicting reports on whether propofol prolongs, shortens, or does not change QT interval. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol on heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval during anesthetic induction. We examined 50 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Patients received 3 μg/kg of fentanyl and were randomly allocated to one of the following 2 groups. Group S patients received 5 mg/kg of thiamylal followed by sevoflurane, 5 % at the inhaled concentration. Group P patients received propofol using TCI system at 5 μg/mL for 2 min followed by 3 μg/mL. Tracheal intubation was performed after vecuronium administration. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), bispectral index score (BIS), and QTc interval in 12-lead electrocardiogram were recorded at the following time points: just before fentanyl administration (T1), 2 min after fentanyl injection (T2), 1 min after thiamylal injection or 2 min after the start of TCI (T3), just before intubation (T4), and 2 min after intubation (T5). BIS and MAP significantly decreased after anesthetic induction in both groups. HR decreased after anesthetic induction and recovered after tracheal intubation in group P, whereas it did changed in group S throughout the study period. QTc interval was shortened at T3 and T4 in group P, but prolonged at T3, T4, and T5 in group S, as compared with T1. Propofol TCI shortens QTc interval, whereas sevoflurane prolongs QTc interval during anesthetic induction.

Role of ion channels in sepsis-induced atrial tachyarrhythmias in guinea pigs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, are occasionally observed in patients suffering from sepsis. Modulation of cardiac ion channel function and expression by sepsis may have a role in the genesis of tachyarrhythmias.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Sepsis was induced by LPS (i.p.; 300 µg·kg(-1) ) in guinea pigs. Membrane potentials and ionic currents were measured in atrial myocytes isolated from guinea pigs 10 h after LPS, using whole cell patch-clamp methods.

KEY RESULTS

In atrial cells from LPS-treated animals, action potential duration (APD) was significantly shortened. It was associated with a reduced L-type Ca(2+) current and an increased delayed rectifier K(+) current. These electrophysiological changes were eliminated when N(G) -nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) or S-ethylisothiourea was given together with LPS. In atrial tissues from LPS-treated animals, Ca(2+) channel subunits (Ca(v) 1.2 and Ca(v) 1.3) decreased and delayed rectifier K(+) channel subunits (K(v) 11.1 and K(v) 7.1) increased. However, L-NAME treatment did not substantially reverse such changes in atrial expression in LPS-treated animals, with the exception that K(v) 11.1 subunits returned to control levels. After LPS injection, inducible NOS in atrial tissues was up-regulated, and atrial NO production clearly increased.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In atrial myocytes from guinea pigs with sepsis, APD was significantly shortened. This may reflect nitration of the ion channels which would alter channel functions, rather than changes in atrial expression of the channels. Shortening of APD could serve as one of the mechanisms underlying atrial tachyarrhythmia in sepsis.

Propofol and arrhythmias: two sides of the coin

The hypnotic agent propofol is effective for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, recent studies have shown that propofol administration is related to arrhythmias. Propofol displays both pro- and anti-arrhythmic effects in a concentration-dependent manner. Data indicate that propofol can convert supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia and may inhibit the conduction system of the heart. The mechanism of the cardiac effects remains poorly defined and may involve ion channels, the autonomic nervous system and cardiac gap junctions. Specifically, sodium, calcium and potassium currents in cardiac cells are suppressed by clinically relevant concentrations of propofol. Propofol shortens the action potential duration (APD) but lessens the ischemia-induced decrease in the APD. Furthermore, propofol suppresses both sympathetic and parasympathetic tone and preserves gap junctions during ischemia. All of these effects cumulatively contribute to the antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic properties of propofol.