Induction of heart failure: haemodynamic comparison of three different canine models

Large and Small Animal Models of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) describes a heterogenous complex spectrum of pathological conditions that results in structural and functional remodeling leading to subsequent impairment of cardiac function, including either systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or both. Several factors chronically lead to HF, including cardiac volume and pressure overload that may result from hypertension, valvular lesions, acute, or chronic ischemic injuries. Major forms of HF include hypertrophic, dilated, and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The severity of cardiomyopathy can be impacted by other comorbidities such as diabetes or obesity and external stress factors. Age is another major contributor, and the number of patients with HF is rising worldwide in part due to an increase in the aged population. HF can occur with reduced ejection fraction (HF with reduced ejection fraction), that is, the overall cardiac function is compromised, and typically the left ventricular ejection fraction is lower than 40%. In some cases of HF, the ejection fraction is preserved (HF with preserved ejection fraction). Animal models play a critical role in facilitating the understanding of molecular mechanisms of how hearts fail. This review aims to summarize and describe the strengths, limitations, and outcomes of both small and large animal models of HF with reduced ejection fraction that are currently used in basic and translational research. The driving defect is a failure of the heart to adequately supply the tissues with blood due to impaired filling or pumping. An accurate model of HF with reduced ejection fraction would encompass the symptoms (fatigue, dyspnea, exercise intolerance, and edema) along with the pathology (collagen fibrosis, ventricular hypertrophy) and ultimately exhibit a decrease in cardiac output. Although countless experimental studies have been published, no model completely recapitulates the full human disease. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the strength and weakness of each animal model to allow better selection of what animal models to use to address the scientific question proposed.

Merits of non-invasive rat models of left ventricular heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is characterized as a limitation to cardiac output that prevents the heart from supplying tissues with adequate oxygen and predisposes individuals to pulmonary edema. Impaired cardiac function is secondary to either decreased contractility reducing ejection (systolic failure), diminished ventricular compliance preventing filling (diastolic failure), or both. To study HF etiology, many different techniques have been developed to elicit this condition in experimental animals, with varying degrees of success. Among rats, surgically induced HF models are the most prevalent, but they bear several shortcomings, including high mortality rates and limited recapitulation of the pathophysiology, etiology, and progression of human HF. Alternatively, a number of non-invasive HF induction methods avoid many of these pitfalls, and their merits in technical simplicity, reliability, survivability, and comparability to the pathophysiologic and pathogenic characteristics of HF are reviewed herein. In particular, this review focuses on the primary pathogenic mechanisms common to genetic strains (spontaneously hypertensive and spontaneously hypertensive heart failure), pharmacological models of toxic cardiomyopathy (doxorubicin and isoproterenol), and dietary salt models, all of which have been shown to induce left ventricular HF in the rat. Additional non-invasive techniques that may potentially enable the development of new HF models are also discussed.

Animal models of myocardial and vascular injury

Over the past century, numerous animal models have been developed in an attempt to understand myocardial and vascular injury. However, the successful translation of results observed in animals to human therapy remains low. To understand this problem, we present several animal models of cardiac and vascular injury that are of particular relevance to the cardiac or vascular surgeon. We also explore the potential clinical implications and limitations of each model with respect to the human disease state. Our results underscore the concept that animal research requires an in-depth understanding of the model, animal physiology, and the potential confounding factors. Future outcome analyses with standardized animal models may improve translation of animal research from the bench to the bedside.