Pancreatic and cardiometabolic complications of severe hypertriglyceridaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review endeavours to explore the aetiopathogenesis and impact of severe hypertriglyceridemia (SHTG) and chylomicronaemia on cardiovascular, and pancreatic complications and summarizes the novel pharmacological options for management.

RECENT FINDINGS

SHTG, although rare, presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Familial chylomicronaemia syndrome (FCS), is the rare monogenic form of SHTG, associated with increased acute pancreatitis (AP) risk, whereas relatively common multifactorial chylomicronaemia syndrome (MCS) leans more towards cardiovascular complications. Despite the introduction and validation of the FCS Score, FCS continues to be underdiagnosed and diagnosis is often delayed. Longitudinal data on disease progression remains scant. SHTG-induced AP remains a life-threatening concern, with conservative treatment as the cornerstone while blood purification techniques offer limited additional benefit. Conventional lipid-lowering medications exhibit minimal efficacy, underscoring the growing interest in novel therapeutic avenues, that is, antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and short interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3) and angiopoietin-like protein 3 and/or 8 (ANGPTL3/8).

SUMMARY

Despite advancements in understanding the genetic basis and pathogenesis of SHTG, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges persist. The rarity of FCS and the heterogenous phenotype of MCS underscore the need for the development of predictive models for complications and tailored personalized treatment strategies. The establishment of national and international registries is advocated to augment disease comprehension and identify high-risk individuals.

Established and potential cardiovascular risk factors in metabolic syndrome: Effect of bariatric surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the role of novel biomarkers in metabolic syndrome, their association with cardiovascular risk and the impact of bariatric surgery on these biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Metabolic syndrome encompasses an intricate network of health problems, and its constituents extend beyond the components of its operational definition. Obesity-related dyslipidaemia not only leads to quantitative changes in lipoprotein concentration but also alteration in qualitative composition of various lipoprotein subfractions, including HDL particles, rendering them proatherogenic. This is compounded by the concurrent existence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which pave the common pathway to inflammation and oxidative stress culminating in heightened atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Bariatric surgery is an exceptional modality to reverse both conventional and less recognised aspects of metabolic syndrome. It reduces the burden of atherosclerosis by ameliorating the impact of obesity and its related complications (OSA, NAFLD) on quantitative and qualitative composition of lipoproteins, ultimately improving endothelial function and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

SUMMARY

Several novel biomarkers, which are not traditionally considered as components of metabolic syndrome play a crucial role in determining ASCVD risk in metabolic syndrome. Due to their independent association with ASCVD, it is imperative that these are addressed. Bariatric surgery is a widely recognized intervention to improve the conventional risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome; however, it also serves as an effective treatment to optimize novel biomarkers.

What should be the goal of cholesterol-lowering treatment? A quantitative evaluation dispelling guideline myths

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Guidelines for cholesterol-lowering treatment generally include extensive review of epidemiological and clinical trial evidence. However, the next logical step, the translation of evidence into clinical advice, occurs not entirely by reasoning, but by a form of consensus in which the prejudices and established beliefs of the societies with interests in cardiovascular disease convened to interpret the evidence are prominent. Methods, which are the subject of this review, have, however, been developed by which clinical trial evidence can be translated objectively into best practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Guidelines differ in their recommended goals for cholesterol-lowering treatment in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Proposed goals are LDL-cholesterol 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) or less in lower risk, LDL-cholesterol 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) or less in higher risk, non-HDL-cholesterol decrease of at least 40% or LDL-cholesterol 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) or less or decreased by at least 50% whichever is lower. Evidence from clinical trials of statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-inhibitors can be expressed in simple mathematical terms to compare the efficacy on ASCVD incidence of clinical guidance for the use of cholesterol-lowering medication. The target LDL-cholesterol of 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) is ineffective and lacks credibility. Cholesterol-lowering medication is most effective in high-risk people with raised LDL-cholesterol. The best overall therapeutic target is LDL-cholesterol 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) or less or decreased by at least 50% whichever is lower. The use of non-HDL-cholesterol as a therapeutic goal is less efficacious. Aiming for LDL-cholesterol 1.4 mmol/l (55 mg/dl) or less as opposed to 1.8 mmol/l produces only a small additional benefit. Evidence for apolipoprotein B targets in hypertriglyceridaemia and in very high ASCVD risk should be more prominent in future guidelines.

SUMMARY

The LDL-cholesterol goal of 2.6 mmol/l or less should be abandoned. Percentage decreases in LDL-cholesterol or non-HDL-cholesterol concentration are better in people with initial concentrations of less than 3.6 mmol/l. The LDL-cholesterol target of 1.8 mmol/l is most effective when initial LDL-cholesterol is more than 3.6 mmol/l in both primary and secondary prevention.

Diabetic dyslipidaemia

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an escalating pandemic and an established cardiovascular risk factor. An important aspect of the interaction between DM and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is diabetic dyslipidaemia, an atherogenic dyslipidaemia encompassing quantitative [hypertriglyceridaemia (hyperTG) and decreased high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)] and qualitative [increased small dense low density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL) particles, large very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL) subfraction (VLDL1) and dysfunctional HDL] modifications in lipoproteins. Much of the pathophysiology linking DM and dyslipidaemia has been elucidated. This paper aims to review the pathophysiology and management of diabetic dyslipidaemia with respect to ASCVD. Briefly, the influence of diabetic kidney disease on lipid profile and lipid changes causing type 2 diabetes mellitus are highlighted. Biomarkers of diabetic dyslipidaemia, including novel markers and clinical trials that have demonstrated that non-lipid and lipid lowering therapies can lower cardiovascular risk in diabetics are discussed. The stands of various international guidelines on lipid management in DM are emphasised. It is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of diabetic dyslipidaemia in order to develop new therapeutic strategies against dyslipidaemia and diabetes. The various international guidelines on lipid management can be used to tailor a holistic approach specific to each patient with diabetic dyslipidaemia.

Prevalence and pattern of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Zaria, Northwestern Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

Dyslipidemia confers excess atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, and this requires prompt identification and management to reduce morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the prevalence and pattern of dyslipidemia in type 2 DM patients in Zaria, Northwestern Nigeria.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of newly diagnosed type 2 DM patients at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTH), Zaria. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the case notes of eligible patients and analyzed using STATA version 14. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median and interquartile range (IQR) while categorical variables were as frequencies and percentages. Student t and chi-square tests were used to test for association at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 322 subjects (161 male, 161 female) with a mean age of 53.5 ± 10.8 years partook in the study. The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 69.3%. Mixed dyslipidemia of high triglyceride (TG) and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was present in 41.0%; high TG and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in 2.8%; and high LDL and low HDL in 2.5%. Atherogenic dyslipidemia, isolated hypercholesterolemia and isolated low HDL-cholesterol were present in 3.4%, 2.5% and 23.6% respectively. Dyslipidemia status was not associated with age, sex, duration of DM or hypertension, obesity, and mean fasting blood sugar (FBS) and 2-hour postprandial glucose.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of dyslipidemia is high in the newly diagnosed type 2 DM patients and therefore, initial management should incorporate measures to control dyslipidemia.

Non-HDL cholesterol should not generally replace LDL cholesterol in the management of hyperlipidaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Non-HDL cholesterol was originally conceived as a therapeutic target for statin treatment in hypertriglyceridaemia when apolipoprotein B100 assays were not widely available. Recently non-HDL cholesterol has been recommended to replace LDL cholesterol in the clinical management of dyslipidaemia routinely in general medical practice. This is misguided.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-HDL cholesterol is heterogeneous, constituting a mixture of triglyceride-rich VLDL, intermediate density lipoprotein and LDL in which small dense LDL is poorly represented and to which VLDL cholesterol contributes increasingly as triglyceride levels rise. This makes it unsuitable as a goal of lipid-lowering treatment or as an arbiter of who should receive such treatment. Results of trials designed to lower LDL cholesterol are not easily translated to non-HDL cholesterol. Fasting is no longer thought essential for screening the general population for raised LDL cholesterol. ApoB100 measurement also does not require fasting even in rarer more extreme lipoprotein disorders encountered in the Lipid Clinic, provides greater precision and specificity and overcomes the problems posed by LDL and non-HDL cholesterol. It is more easily interpreted both in diagnosis and as a therapeutic goal and it includes SD-LDL.

SUMMARY

If we are to discourage use of LDL cholesterol, it should be in favour of apoB100 not non-HDL cholesterol.

The importance of dyslipidaemia in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in people with diabetes

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular events are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in those with diabetes. A key contributor to the development of atherosclerosis in this population is the presence of a particularly atherogenic lipid profile often referred to as 'Diabetic Dyslipidemia'. This profile is characterized by elevated triglycerides, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, small dense LDL particles, and reduced HDL levels. This article reviews the underlying aetiology and pathophysiology of this dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis in those with diabetes, provides insights from epidemiological and genetic studies, and current cardiovascular risk reducing interventions including novel therapies such as PCSK-9 inhibitors.

Quantifying Atherogenic Lipoproteins: Current and Future Challenges in the Era of Personalized Medicine and Very Low Concentrations of LDL Cholesterol. A Consensus Statement from EAS and EFLM

BACKGROUND

The European Atherosclerosis Society-European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Consensus Panel aims to provide recommendations to optimize atherogenic lipoprotein quantification for cardiovascular risk management.

CONTENT

We critically examined LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B (apoB), and LDL particle number assays based on key criteria for medical application of biomarkers. (a) Analytical performance: Discordant LDL cholesterol quantification occurs when LDL cholesterol is measured or calculated with different assays, especially in patients with hypertriglyceridemia >175 mg/dL (2 mmol/L) and low LDL cholesterol concentrations <70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L). Increased lipoprotein(a) should be excluded in patients not achieving LDL cholesterol goals with treatment. Non-HDL cholesterol includes the atherogenic risk component of remnant cholesterol and can be calculated in a standard nonfasting lipid panel without additional expense. ApoB more accurately reflects LDL particle number. (b) Clinical performance: LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB are comparable predictors of cardiovascular events in prospective population studies and clinical trials; however, discordance analysis of the markers improves risk prediction by adding remnant cholesterol (included in non-HDL cholesterol) and LDL particle number (with apoB) risk components to LDL cholesterol testing. (c) Clinical and cost-effectiveness: There is no consistent evidence yet that non-HDL cholesterol-, apoB-, or LDL particle-targeted treatment reduces the number of cardiovascular events and healthcare-related costs than treatment targeted to LDL cholesterol.

SUMMARY

Follow-up of pre- and on-treatment (measured or calculated) LDL cholesterol concentration in a patient should ideally be performed with the same documented test method. Non-HDL cholesterol (or apoB) should be the secondary treatment target in patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia, in whom LDL cholesterol measurement or calculation is less accurate and often less predictive of cardiovascular risk. Laboratories should report non-HDL cholesterol in all standard lipid panels.

Chitosan oligosaccharides enhance lipid droplets via down-regulation of PCSK9 gene expression in HepG2 cells

Chitosan oligosaccharides (COS), linear polymers of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and deacetylated glucosamine, exhibit diverse pharmacological effects such as antimicrobial, antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Here, we explored their hypocholesterolemic effects in vivo and the molecular mechanisms of COS in hepatic cells. Our in vivo study of dyslipidemic ApoE^-/- male mice showed that COS treatment of 500 mg kg^-1 d^-1 for 4 weeks clearly reduced the lipid deposits in the aorta and significantly decreased the hepatic proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein levels versus HFD groups (p < 0.05). To elucidate the mechanisms behind these effects, the HepG2 cell line was treated with COS. We found that COS (200 μg/ml) increased the amount of cell-surface low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and enhanced the lipid droplets in HepG2 cells (p < 0.05). The mRNA levels of LDLR and HMG-CoA protein levels were not altered, and the mRNA levels of PCSK9 were down-regulated by COS treatment for 24 h. We also observed that the expression levels of SREBP-2 (125 kD) and HNF-1α were increased in total cell lysates, but nuclear SREBP-2 (nSREBP-2, 68 kD, the active subunit of SREBP-2) levels were decreased and FOXO3a levels increased in nuclear lysates after COS treatment for 24 h. We demonstrated that one of the reasons for regulation of lipid transfer with COS is that FOXO3a levels are up-regulated by COS, leading to a reduction in the PCSK9 promoter binding capacity of HNF-1α and thus suppressing PCSK9 gene expression, up-regulating LDLR levels, and enhancing the lipid droplets in HepG2 cells. In addition, decreased expression of the PCSK9 gene was also contributed to by down-regulation of SREBP-2 by COS. We further confirmed the effect of suppression of PCSK9 expression by COS by utilizing RNA interference to silence HNF-1α and SREBP-2. Finally, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate that PCSK9 expression and LDLR activity are synergistically changed by a combination of HNF-1α and SREBP-2 after COS treatment. Our findings indicate that COS may regulate PCSK9 to modulate hepatic LDLR abundance and activity.

A comparison of the effects of low- and high-dose atorvastatin on lipoprotein metabolism and inflammatory cytokines in type 2 diabetes: Results from the Protection Against Nephropathy in Diabetes with Atorvastatin (PANDA) randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy is recommended in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) although views on treatment intensity and therapeutic targets remain divided.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to compare the effects of high-intensity and moderate-intensity atorvastatin treatment on lipoprotein metabolism and inflammatory markers and how frequently treatment goals are met in high-risk T2DM patients.

METHODS

Patients with T2DM and albuminuria (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio >5 mg/mmol, total cholesterol <7 mmol/L, proteinuria <2 g/d, creatinine <200 μmol/L) were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 59) or 80 mg (n = 60) daily. Baseline and 1-year follow-up data are reported.

RESULTS

Patients were at high cardiovascular disease risk (observed combined mortality and nonfatal cardiovascular disease annual event rate 4.8%). The non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) goal of <2.6 mmol/L was achieved in 72% of participants receiving high-dose atorvastatin, but only in 40% on low-dose atorvastatin (P < .005). The proportion achieving apolipoprotein B (apoB) <0.8 g/L on high-dose and low-dose atorvastatin was 82% and 70%, respectively (NS). Total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-HDL-C, oxidized LDL, apoB, glyc-apoB, apolipoprotein E, and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 decreased significantly, more so in participants on high-dose atorvastatin. Adiponectin increased and serum amyloid A decreased without dose dependency. Neither dose produced significant changes in HDL-C, cholesterol efflux, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, glycated hemoglobin, serum paraoxonase-1, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase, or cholesteryl ester transfer protein.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose atorvastatin is more effective in achieving non-HDL-C therapeutic goals and in modifying LDL-related parameters. Recommended apoB treatment targets may require revision. Despite the increase in adiponectin and the decrease in serum amyloid A, HDL showed no change in functionality.

Efficacy and Safety of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia

PURPOSE

Evolocumab significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C); we investigated its effects on LDL-C lowering in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in hypercholesterolemic patients selected from the phase 2 and 3 trials who had fasting triglyceride levels ≥1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL elevated triglycerides) and <1.7 mmol/L (without elevated triglycerides). Fasting triglyceride level ≥ 4.5 mmol/L at screening was an exclusion criterion for these studies, but post-enrollment triglyceride levels may have exceeded 4.5 mmol/L (400 mg/dL). Efficacy was evaluated in four phase 3 randomized studies (n = 1148) and safety from the phase 2 and 3 studies (n = 2246) and their open-label extension studies (n = 1698). Efficacy analyses were based on 12-week studies, while safety analyses included data from all available studies. Treatment differences were calculated vs. placebo and ezetimibe after pooling dose frequencies.

RESULTS

Mean treatment difference in percentage change from baseline in LDL-C for participants with elevated triglycerides and those without elevated triglycerides (mean of weeks 10 and 12) with evolocumab was approximately -67 % vs. placebo and -42 % vs. ezetimibe (all P < 0.001) compared to −65 % vs. placebo and −39 % vs. ezetimibe, [corrected] respectively. Treatment differences for evolocumab vs. placebo and ezetimibe followed a similar pattern for non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B. Evolocumab was well tolerated, with balanced rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation of evolocumab vs. comparator (placebo and/or ezetimibe).

CONCLUSION

The significant reductions of atherogenic lipids including LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B seen with evolocumab are similar in patients with and without mixed hyperlipidemia.

Diabetic dyslipidaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose is to discuss recent developments in the understanding of lipoprotein metabolism in diabetes, the cardiovascular risk associated with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, recently published guidelines on the management of this risk, concerns over the use of statin treatment in diabetes, and other therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetic dyslipidaemia can be gross with massive hypertriglyceridemia, or subtle with a lipid profile which would be regarded as normal in a nondiabetic patient, but which hides underlying increases in atherogenic subfractions of LDL (e.g., small dense LDL, glycated LDL) and remnant lipoproteins. Statins can decrease these without the clinician being aware from routine biochemistry. In type 2 diabetes, HDL cholesterol levels are often reduced, whereas in type 1, insulin can raise HDL, but its antiatherogenic properties are compromised. Dyslipidaemia and hypertension predate the onset of glycaemia of diabetic proportions (metabolic syndrome). Obese people can thus die of diabetes before they develop it. Obesity should be prevented and treated. Statins decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetes or metabolic syndrome regardless of whether glycaemia worsens.

SUMMARY

One unassailable truth is that statin therapy is beneficial and should rarely, if ever, be withheld.

Diabetes Dyslipidemia

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a considerably increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Intensive glycemic control has essentially failed to significantly improve cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials. Dyslipidemia is common in diabetes and there is strong evidence that cholesterol lowering improves cardiovascular outcomes, even in patients with apparently unremarkable lipid profiles. Here, the authors review the pathophysiology and implications of the alterations in lipoproteins observed in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, the effect of medications commonly used in the management of diabetes on the lipid profile, the evidence for lifestyle and pharmaceutical interventions, and national and international recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia in patients with diabetes.

Effect of Extended-Release Niacin on High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Functionality, Lipoprotein Metabolism, and Mediators of Vascular Inflammation in Statin-Treated Patients

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the influence of extended-release niacin/laropiprant (ERN/LRP) versus placebo on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) antioxidant function, cholesterol efflux, apolipoprotein B100 (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, and mediators of vascular inflammation associated with 15% increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Study patients had persistent dyslipidemia despite receiving high-dose statin treatment.

Methods and Results

In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we compared the effect of ERN/LRP with placebo in 27 statin-treated dyslipidemic patients who had not achieved National Cholesterol Education Program-ATP III targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We measured fasting lipid profile, apolipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, paraoxonase 1 (PON1) activity, small dense LDL apoB (sdLDL-apoB), oxidized LDL (oxLDL), glycated apoB (glyc-apoB), lipoprotein phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), lysophosphatidyl choline (lyso-PC), macrophage chemoattractant protein (MCP1), serum amyloid A (SAA) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). We also examined the capacity of HDL to protect LDL from in vitro oxidation and the percentage cholesterol efflux mediated by apoB depleted serum. ERN/LRP was associated with an 18% increase in HDL-C levels compared to placebo (1.55 versus 1.31 mmol/L, P<0.0001). There were significant reductions in total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, total serum apoB, lipoprotein (a), CETP activity, oxLDL, Lp-PLA2, lyso-PC, MCP1, and SAA, but no significant changes in glyc-apoB or sdLDL-apoB concentration. There was a modest increase in cholesterol efflux function of HDL (19.5%, P=0.045), but no change in the antioxidant capacity of HDL in vitro or PON1 activity.

Conclusions

ERN/LRP reduces LDL-associated mediators of vascular inflammation, but has varied effects on HDL functionality and LDL quality, which may counter its HDL-C-raising effect.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01054508.

A multicentre analysis of four low-density lipoprotein cholesterol direct assays in samples with extreme high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations

BACKGROUND

Although LDL-C has been traditionally estimated using the Friedewald formula (FF), several direct homogeneous assays have been developed to overcome the limitations of this formula and the complicated manual procedure required in the reference method. However, several differences have been reported between these assays in certain situations.

METHODS

Two groups of 105 samples with extreme low and high HDL-C concentrations were processed, employing four different instruments and with the reagents for total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C and LDL-C provided by the distinct manufacturers.

RESULTS

Statistical tests indicated important differences between HDL-C and LDL-C homogeneous methods. Poor correlation, significant bias and high discrepancy in cardiovascular disease risk classification were observed for LDL-C direct assays in the low HDL-C group, whereas better results were obtained when comparing LDL-C levels estimated with the FF. In contrast, three of the four instruments generated LDL-C direct results with a good agreement in the high HDL-C group, even though an appreciable misclassification percentage in risk categories must be taken into account.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that extreme low or high HDL-C levels can represent a non-previously described source of variation between commercially available LDL-C homogeneous assays.