Exercise responses following heart transplantation: 5 year follow-up

Exercise as a modality to improve heart transplantation-related functional impairments: An article review

Heart transplantation (HT), the treatment choice of advanced heart failure patients, is proven effective in increasing the survival and functional status of the recipients. However, compared to normal controls, functional status is lower in HT recipients. Exercise given in cardiac rehabilitation has been shown to improve exercise capacity as measured with peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) and muscle strength after completion of the program and cessation of exercise results in loss of exercise benefits. Several factors related to cardiac denervation and the use of immunosuppressive agents in HT recipients result in functional impairments including cardiovascular, pulmonary, exercise capacity, psychological, and quality of life (QoL) problems. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is the most common type of exercise used in HT recipients and given as a hospital-based program. Improvement of functional impairments was found to have occurred due to primarily musculoskeletal adaptations through improvement of muscle structure and aerobic capacity and cardiovascular adaptations. In general, exercise given after transplantation improved VO2 peak significantly and improvement was better in the HIIT group compared to moderate intensity continuous training or no-exercise groups. Improvement of QoL was ascribed to improvement of exercise capacity, symptoms, pulmonary function, physical capacity improvement, anxiety, and depression.

Early Cardiopulmonary Fitness after Heart Transplantation as a Determinant of Post-Transplant Survival

BACKGROUND

Decreased peak oxygen consumption during exercise (peak Vo₂) is a well-established prognostic marker for mortality in ambulatory heart failure. After heart transplantation, the utility of peak Vo₂ as a marker of post-transplant survival is not well established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult heart transplant recipients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing within a year of transplant between the years 2000 to 2011. Using time-to-event models, we analyzed the hazard of mortality over nearly two decades of follow-up as a function of post-transplant percent predicted peak Vo₂ (%Vo₂). A total of 235 patients met inclusion criteria. The median post-transplant %Vo₂ was 49% (IQR 42 to 60). Each standard deviation (±14%) increase in %Vo₂ was associated with a 32% decrease in mortality in adjusted models (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87, p = 0.002). A %Vo₂ below 29%, 64% and 88% predicted less than 80% survival at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant peak Vo₂ is a highly significant prognostic marker for long-term post-transplant survival. It remains to be seen whether decreased peak Vo₂ post-transplant is modifiable as a target to improve post-transplant longevity.

Impact of Exercise Modalities on Peripheral and Central Components of Cardiorespiratory Capacity in Heart Transplantation Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: To analyze the effects of aerobic, resistance, and combined training on peripheral and central components related to cardiorespiratory capacity after HTx. Materials and Methods: No time restriction was applied for study inclusion. MEDLINE/PubMed; EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PEDro databases were investigated. Studies reporting heart transplanted patients older than 19 years following aerobic, resistance, and combined training according. The outcomes included: V′O₂ peak, VE/V’CO₂ slope, heart rate (HR peak), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP peak), maximum repetition test(1RM), sit-to-stand test, and flow-mediated dilation (FMD). The studies were selected by consensus. Four hundred ninety-two studies initially met the selection criteria. Cochrane handbook was used for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Independent extraction by two observers was applied. Results: Isolated aerobic training leads to a greater increase in V′O₂ peak than combined training compared to the control group (p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). However, no significant differences were found in the subgroup comparison (p = 0.19, I2 = 42.1%). HR peak increased similarly after aerobic and combined training. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) was better than moderate continuous intensity to increase the V′O₂ after long term in HTx. Still, there is scarce evidence of HIIT on muscle strength and FMD. No change on VE/V’CO₂ slope, FMD, and SBP, DBP peak. 1RM and the sit-to-stand test increased after resistance training (p < 0.001, I2 = 70%) and CT (p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) when compared to control. Conclusions: Aerobic and combined training effectively improve VO₂ peak and muscle strength, respectively. HIIT seems the better choice for cardiorespiratory capacity improvements. More studies are needed to examine the impact of training modalities on VE/V’CO₂ slope and FMD.

Exercise training in heart transplantation

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard in the treatment of end-stage heart failure (HF). Heart transplantation patients present lower exercise capacity due to cardiovascular and musculoskeletal alterations leading thus to poor quality of life and reduction in the ability of daily self-service. Impaired vascular function and diastolic dysfunction cause lower cardiac output while decreased skeletal muscle oxidative fibers, enzymes and capillarity cause arteriovenous oxygen difference, leading thus to decreased peak oxygen uptake in heart transplant recipients. Exercise training improves exercise capacity, cardiac and vascular endothelial function in heart transplant recipients. Pre-rehabilitation regular aerobic or combined exercise is beneficial for patients with end-stage HF awaiting heart transplantation in order to maintain a higher fitness level and reduce complications afterwards like intensive care unit acquired weakness or cardiac cachexia. All hospitalized patients after heart transplantation should be referred to early mobilization of skeletal muscles through kinesiotherapy of the upper and lower limbs and respiratory physiotherapy in order to prevent infections of the respiratory system prior to hospital discharge. Moreover, all heart transplant recipients after hospital discharge who have not already participated in an early cardiac rehabilitation program should be referred to a rehabilitation center by their health care provider. Although high intensity interval training seems to have more benefits than moderate intensity continuous training, especially in stable transplant patients, individualized training based on the abilities and needs of each patient still remains the most appropriate approach. Cardiac rehabilitation appears to be safe in heart transplant patients. However, long-term follow-up data is incomplete and, therefore, further high quality and adequately-powered studies are needed to demonstrate the long-term benefits of exercise training in this population.

Diagnosis and management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

One of the main causes of death beyond the first year after heart transplantation is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). This review summarises the current understanding of its complex pathophysiology, detection and treatment, including the available data on non-invasive imaging modalities used for screening and diagnosis. A better understanding of this entity is crucial to improving the long-term outcomes of the growing population of patients with a heart transplant.

Prevalence of iron deficiency in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Optimal iron management is crucial to marginal patients such as heart transplant recipients. As inflammatory mechanisms are present in transplant recipients, the definition of iron deficiency used in the general population might not be appropriate.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and determinants of iron deficiency in Norwegian heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

We consecutively assessed iron parameters in all Norwegian heart transplant recipients at their annual follow-up. Several definitions of iron deficiency suggested in the literature were assessed: ferritin <100 µg/L, or ferritin 100-300 µg/L combined with transferrin saturation of <20% (ID_HF ); ferritin <100 µg/L (ID_F100 ); transferrin saturation of <20% (ID_Tsat ), and ferritin <30 µg/L (ID_F30 ).

RESULTS

179 of 378 heart transplant recipients (47%) had iron deficiency defined as ID_HF . 152 patients (40%) had ID_F100 , and 103 patients (27%) had ID_Tsat . 17 patients (5%) had ID_F30 . 88 patients (23%) had a C-reactive protein (CRP) >5.0 µg/L.

CONCLUSION

Iron deficiency defined as ID_HF , ID_F100, or ID_Tsat is prevalent in the heart transplant population, while ID_F30 is not. Further research is required to identify the mechanisms of iron homeostasis in heart transplant recipients and to establish a definition of iron deficiency suitable for this population.

Heart rate kinetics during standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing in heart transplant recipients: a longitudinal study

AIMS

Heart transplantation (HTx) results in complete autonomic denervation of the donor heart, causing resting tachycardia and abnormal heart rate (HR) responses to exercise. We determined the time course of suggestive cardiac reinnervation post HTx and investigated its clinical significance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Heart rate kinetics during standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 2.5-5 years after HTx was assessed in 58 patients. According to their HR increase 30 s after exercise onset, HTx recipients were classified as denervated (slow responders: <5 beats per minute [b.p.m.]) or potentially reinnervated (fast responders: ≥5 b.p.m.). Additionally, in 30 patients, longitudinal changes of maximal oxygen consumption and HR kinetics were assessed during the first 15 post-operative years. At 2.5-5 years post HTx, 38% of our study population was potentially reinnervated. Fast responders were significantly younger (41 ± 15 years) than slow responders (53 ± 13 years, P = 0.003) but did not differ with regard to donor age, immunosuppressive regime, cardiovascular risk factors, endomyocardial biopsy, or vasculopathy parameters. While HR reserve (56 ± 20 vs. 39 ± 15 b.p.m., P = 0.002) and HR recovery after 60 s (15 ± 11 vs. 5 ± 6 b.p.m., P < 0.001) were greater in fast responders, resting HR, peak HR of predicted, and peak oxygen consumption of predicted were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Signs of reinnervation occurred mainly in younger patients. Maximal oxygen consumption was independent of HR kinetics.

Cardiac rehabilitation program improves exercise capacity in heart transplantation recipients regardless of marginal donor factors

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended to improve exercise capacity after heart transplantation (HTx); however, the effects of marginal donor factors are unclear. Forty-one recipients participated in a 3-month CR program early after HTx (mean age 39 ± 14 years; 88% male). Patients were divided into marginal (≥ 2 marginal donor factors; n = 24) and control groups (< 2 marginal donor factors; n = 17). We examined donor and recipient factors related to change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂) during the CR program using multiple linear regression analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although the mean age was higher in the marginal group (43 ± 13 vs. 34 ± 14 years, p = 0.043). Peak VO₂ and knee extensor muscular strength (KEMS) improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05), but there were no observed inter-group differences. Multiple analysis revealed change in KEMS (β = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.023-1.01) as an independent predictor of change in peak VO₂ after adjustment for recipients' age, sex, and CR attendance frequency (adjusted R² = 0.25, p = 0.0084), whereas marginal donor factors were not a predictor (p = 0.76). The CR program improved exercise capacity in HTx recipients regardless of marginal donor factors, suggesting that recipients of marginal donor hearts should be referred to CR programs.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Following Heart Transplantation

Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is required in a subset of patients (∼10%) for sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block both early and late after heart transplantation. The incidence of PPM implantation has decreased to <5% with the advent of bicaval anastamosis transplantation surgery. Pacing dependence upon follow-up has been variably reported. An even smaller percentage of transplantation recipients (1.5% to 3.4%) undergo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Rigorous data are lacking for the use of ICDs in the transplantation population and is largely derived from cohort studies and case series. Sudden cardiac death occurs in approximately 10% of transplantation recipients, but multiple nonarrhythmic factors are believed to be responsible, including acute rejection, late graft failure with electromechanical dissociation, and ischemia due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the existing data regarding the role for PPMs and ICDs in this population, including leadless PPMs and subcutaneous ICDs, special considerations, and future directions.

Cardiopulmonary, biomarkers, and vascular responses to acute hypoxia following cardiac transplantation

Previous studies have suggested good adaptation of cardiac transplant (CTx) recipients to exposure to a high altitude. No studies have investigated the cardiopulmonary and biomarker responses to acute hypoxic challenges following CTx. Thirty-six CTx recipients and 17 age-matched healthy controls (HC) were recruited. Sixteen (16) patients (42%) had cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Cardiopulmonary responses to maximal and submaximal exercise at 21% O₂ , 20-minutes hypoxia (11.5% O₂ ), and following a 10-minute exposure to 11.5% O₂ using 30% of peak power output were completed. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) were measured at baseline and at peak stress. Endothelial peripheral function was assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy. Compared with HC, CTx presented a lesser O₂ desaturation both at rest (-19.4 ± 6.8 [CTx] vs -24.2 ± 6.0% O₂ [HC], P < 0.05) and following exercise (-23.2 ± 4.9 [CTx] vs -26.2 ± 4.7% O₂ [HC], P < 0.05). CTx patients exhibited a significant decrease in peak oxygen uptake. IL-6 and VEGF levels were significantly higher in CTx recipients in basal conditions but did not change in response to acute stress. CTx patients exhibit a favorable ventilatory and overall response to hypoxic stress. These data provide further insights on the good adaptability of CTx to exposure to high altitude.

Importance of physical capacity and the effects of exercise in heart transplant recipients

One of the most important prognostic factors in heart failure patients is physical capacity. Patients with very poor physical performance and otherwise eligible, may be listed as candidates for heart transplantation (HTx). After such surgery, life-long immunosuppression therapy is needed to prevent rejection of the new heart. The dark side of immunosuppression is the increased risk of infections, kidney failure, cancer and advanced atherosclerosis (cardiac allograft vasculopathy), with the two latter conditions as the main causes of later mortality. In a worldwide perspective, 50% of the HTx patients survive past 10 years. Poor aerobic capacity prior to graft deterioration is not only limited to the failing heart, but also caused by peripheral factors, such as limited function in the skeletal muscles and in the blood vessels walls. Exercise rehabilitation after HTx is of major importance in order to improve physical capacity and prognosis. Effects of high-intensity interval training (HIT) in HTx recipients is a growing field of research attracting worldwide focus and interest. Accumulating evidence has shown that HIT is safe and efficient in maintenance HTx recipients; with superior effects on physical capacity compared to conventional moderate exercise. This article generates further evidence to the field by summarizing results from a decade of research performed at our center supported by a broad, but not strict formal, literature review. In short, this article demonstrates a strong association between physical capacity measured after HTx and long-term survival. It describes the possible “HIT-effect” with increased levels of inflammatory mediators of angiogenesis. It also describes long-term effects of HIT; showing a positive effect in development of anxiety symptoms despite that the improved physical capacity was not sustained, due to downregulation of exercise and intensity. Finally, our results are linked to the ongoing HITTS study, which investigates safety and efficiency of HIT in de novo HTx recipients. Together with previous results, this study may have the potential to change existing guidelines and contribute to a better prognosis for the HTx population as a whole.

New therapy, new challenges: The effects of long-term continuous flow left ventricular assist device on inflammation

Surgically implanted continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are currently used in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). However, CF-LVAD therapy introduces a new set of complications and adverse events in these patients. Major adverse events with the CF-LVAD include right heart failure, vascular dysfunction, stroke, hepatic failure, and multi-organ failure, complications that may have inflammation as a common etiology. Our aim was to review the current evidence showing a relationship between these adverse events and elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers in CF-LVAD recipients.

Exercise after heart transplantation: An overview

While life expectancy is greatly improved after a heart transplant, survival is still limited, and compared to the general population, the exercise capacity and health-related quality of life of heart transplant recipients are reduced. Increased exercise capacity is associated with a better prognosis. However, although several studies have documented positive effects of exercise after heart transplantation (HTx), little is known about the type, frequency and intensity of exercise that provides the greatest health benefits. Moreover, the long-term effects of exercise on co-morbidities and survival are also unclear. Exercise restrictions apply to patients with a denervated heart, and for decades, it was believed that the transplanted heart remained denervated. This has since been largely disproved, but despite the new knowledge, the exercise restrictions have largely remained, and up-to-date guidelines on exercise prescription after HTx do not exist. High-intensity, interval based aerobic exercise has repeatedly been documented to have superior positive effects and health benefits compared to moderate exercise. This applies to both healthy subjects as well as in several patient groups, such as patients with metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease or heart failure. However, whether the effects of this type of exercise are also applicable to heart transplant populations has not yet been fully established. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the current knowledge about the exercise capacity and effect of exercise among heart transplant recipients and to discuss future exercise strategies.

Exercise limitation following transplantation

Organ transplantation is one of the medical miracles or the 20th century. It has the capacity to substantially improve exercise performance and quality of life in patients who are severely limited with chronic organ failure. We focus on the most commonly performed solid-organ transplants and describe peak exercise performance following recovery from transplantation. Across all of the common transplants, evaluated significant reduction in VO2peak is seen (typically renal and liver 65%-80% with heart and/or lung 50%-60% of predicted). Those with the lowest VO2peak pretransplant have the lowest VO2peak posttransplant. Overall very few patients have a VO2peak in the normal range. Investigation of the cause of the reduction of VO2peak has identified many factors pre- and posttransplant that may contribute. These include organ-specific factors in the otherwise well-functioning allograft (e.g., chronotropic incompetence in heart transplantation) as well as allograft dysfunction itself (e.g., chronic lung allograft dysfunction). However, looking across all transplants, a pattern emerges. A low muscle mass with qualitative change in large exercising skeletal muscle groups is seen pretransplant. Many factor posttransplant aggravate these changes or prevent them recovering, especially calcineurin antagonist drugs which are key immunosuppressing agents. This results in the reduction of VO2peak despite restoration of near normal function of the initially failing organ system. As such organ transplantation has provided an experiment of nature that has focused our attention on an important confounder of chronic organ failure-skeletal muscle dysfunction.

High-intensity interval training improves peak oxygen uptake and muscular exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients

Heart transplant (HTx) recipients usually have reduced exercise capacity with reported VO(2peak) levels of 50-70% predicted value. Our hypothesis was that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an applicable and safe form of exercise in HTx recipients and that it would markedly improve VO(2peak.) Secondarily, we wanted to evaluate central and peripheral mechanisms behind a potential VO(2peak) increase. Forty-eight clinically stable HTx recipients >18 years old and 1-8 years after HTx underwent maximal exercise testing on a treadmill and were randomized to either exercise group (a 1-year HIIT-program) or control group (usual care). The mean ± SD age was 51 ± 16 years, 71% were male and time from HTx was 4.1 ± 2.2 years. The mean VO(2peak) difference between groups at follow-up was 3.6 [2.0, 5.2] mL/kg/min (p < 0.001). The exercise group had 89.0 ± 17.5% of predicted VO(2peak) versus 82.5 ± 20.0 in the control group (p < 0.001). There were no changes in cardiac function measured by echocardiography. We have demonstrated that a long-term, partly supervised and community-based HIIT-program is an applicable, effective and safe way to improve VO(2peak) , muscular exercise capacity and general health in HTx recipients. The results indicate that HIIT should be more frequently used among stable HTx recipients in the future.

Muscular exercise capacity and body fat predict VO(2peak) in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant (HTx) recipients usually have reduced exercise capacity, with reported VO2peak levels of 50-70% of predicted values. This study aimed to evaluate central and peripheral factors predictive of VO2peak.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-one clinically stable HTx recipients >18 years old and 1-8 years after HTx, underwent maximal exercise testing on a treadmill. Clinical laboratory, haemodynamic and echocardiographic data, lung function, and isokinetic muscle strength and muscular exercise capacity were recorded. The mean ± SD age was 52 ± 16 years, 71% were male, and time from HTx was 4.1 ± 2.2 years. The patients were assigned to one of two groups: VO2peak ≤or >27.3 ml/kg/min, which was the median value, corresponding to 80% of predicted value. The group with the higher VO2peak had significantly lower body mass index, body fat, and triglycerides, and significantly higher body water, muscular exercise capacity, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, lung function, mitral annular velocity, peak ventilation, O2 pulse, and VE/VCO2 slope. Donor age, recipient age, sex, medication, ischaemic time, cardiac dimensions, systolic function, and chronotropic responses during exercise were similar. Multiple regression analysis showed that muscular exercise capacity and body fat were the strongest VO2peak predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronotropic incompetence is not a limiting factor for exercise capacity in a population of relatively fit HTx patients. The most significant predictors, representing only peripheral factors, are similar to those often determining VO2peak in healthy, non-athletic individuals. Our findings emphasize the importance of a low percentage of body fat and high muscular exercise capacity in order to attain a sufficient VO2peak level after HTx.

Chronotropic responses to exercise in heart transplant recipients: 1-yr follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Partial normalization of the heart rate (HR) response can take place some time after heart transplantation (HTx), but the extent to which this occurs, its time course, and functional significance remain unclear.

DESIGN

Seventy-seven heart transplantation patients underwent an exercise test at approximately 1, 6, and 12 mos after heart transplantation, consisting of a resting period, a submaximal exercise test, and a maximal exercise test with stair climbing, followed by a recovery period. An HR monitor was used for continuous surveillance of HR.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, HR at rest did not change, whereas all other HR parameters obtained during and after exercise improved, demonstrating a more rapid increase, a higher peak, and a more rapid decline in HR after stopping exercise. Age-predicted maximum HR at baseline was 73% ± 9%, improving to 83% ± 10% at 6 mos (P < 0.001) and to 90% ± 10% at 12 mos (P < 0.001), whereas the Chronotropic Response Index at baseline was 0.49 ± 0.15, improving to 0.67 ± 0.17 at 6 mos (P < 0.001) and to 0.81 ± 0.23 at 12 mos (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial normalization of HR was achieved by 71% of heart transplantation patients at 12 mos, with significant changes occurring within 6 mos in most subjects. These findings should contribute to reducing the exercise restrictions that apply to the denervated heart.

Availability, characteristics, and barriers of rehabilitation programs in organ transplant populations across Canada

Rehabilitation is receiving increasingly more attention from the medical community in the management of individuals' pre- and post-organ transplantation. A cross-sectional descriptive survey was administered to all known transplant programs across Canada to explore the availability, characteristics, and barriers of rehabilitation programs pre- and post-heart, lung, kidney, and liver transplantation. Of the 58 programs surveyed, 35 agreed to participate (nine heart, six lung, 13 kidney, seven liver), and six refused for a response rate of 71%. Twelve transplant programs that offered rehabilitation were identified (six heart, five lung, one liver). All rehabilitation programs identified included aerobic exercises, strength training, and education and involved a multidisciplinary team. The Six Minute Walk Test and the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 questionnaire were the most commonly used outcome measures. In kidney and liver transplant programs, over 50% of respondents from these programs cited lack of funding, shortage of health care personnel, and a low volume of patients in a centralized region as barriers to providing rehabilitation programs. Rehabilitation can play an integral role in pre- and post-transplantation management, and barriers to access and provision of rehabilitation for organ transplant populations should be examined further.

Exercise performance increases coincident to body weight over the first two years following cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

To determine whether exercise performance changed over time once patients stabilized after heart transplantation, metabolic stress testing was performed in patients one and two yr post-heart transplantation.

METHODS

The patient cohort includes those transplanted in our program who survived at least two yr and were able to perform metabolic stress tests during their one- and two-yr annual evaluations. Standard stress test parameters were assessed, including weight, body surface area, rest and exercise heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), exercise time, anaerobic threshold (AT), and maximum VO2 (MVO2). Ejection fraction by echo was also collected. Each patient served as their own control and data were compared using paired t-testing.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the cohort, 48 of whom were able to exercise to at least AT. Patient weight increased from year 1 to year 2 (82.4 ± 15.1 vs. 85.0 ± 17.0 kg, p = 0.035). Systolic BP increased approximately 40 mmHg with exercise with no change in diastolic BP, and there was no difference between years 1 and 2. HR increased approximately 25 bpm with exercise. There was no difference in resting HR but exercise HR increased significantly between yrs (148 ± 15 bpm vs. 154 ± 18 bpm, p = 0.017). Both VO2 at AT and MVO2 increased significantly from year 1 to year 2 (1116 ± 347 mL/min vs. 1192 ± 313 mL/min, p = 0.049 and 1523 ± 337 mL/min vs. 1599 ± 356 mL/min, p = 0.012, respectively) but when corrected for body weight, there were no differences (VO2-AT 13.6 ± 4.0 mL/kg/min vs. 14.0 ± 4.0 mL/kg/min; MVO2 18.7 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min vs. 18.8 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min). All other measured parameters were not different. There was a weak but statistically significant correlation between change in peak HR and change in VO2 at AT between one and two yr post-transplantation (r = 0.30, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that exercise performance as measured by VO2 can increase over time post-heart transplantation and in our cohort appears to be related to both an increase in body weight and an increase in HR from years 1 and 2.

Health-related quality of life and exercise tolerance in recipients of heart transplants and left ventricular assist devices: a prospective, comparative study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical exercise tolerance in patients after heart transplantation (HTx) or implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS

A prospective, comparative design was used to characterize changes over time in HRQoL (SF-36) and exercise tolerance in patients after HTx (n = 54) and during LVAD support (n = 36). Nine LVAD patients were lost for follow-up. The majority of patients in both groups were male (97%); the LVAD cohort tended to be younger (p = 0.06).

RESULTS

HRQoL improved significantly in HTx patients in the SF-36 physical (p = 0.02), but not in the psychosocial (p = 0.27) component score during follow-up. In the LVAD group, HRQoL showed improvements for both the SF-36 physical and psychosocial component scores (both p = 0.04). Between-group comparisons revealed better HRQoL for the HTx cohort than the LVAD cohort for 2 of 8 SF-36 subscales. Age-, gender- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted exercise tolerance (workload; VO(2max)) showed significant improvements for both HTx (p = 0.01) and LVAD (p = 0.01) patients. Adjusted maximum oxygen consumption was higher for HTx patients (p = 0.05) relative to LVAD patients at 8 ± 1 months after implant.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL and exercise capacity increased in both groups over the time-course of the study. After adjusting for relevant variables, HTx patients showed a higher exercise tolerance compared with the LVAD group during follow-up. Thus, future large-scale intervention studies should emphasize the specific needs of these patient cohorts.

Assessing exercise performance after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Heart transplantation improves the survival rate and quality of life in patients with severe symptoms of congestive heart failure and an ejection fraction of 20% or less. Despite marked symptomatic and clinical improvement in those who undergo heart transplantation, exercise capacity often remains reduced, and the factors limiting exercise performance during the post-transplantation period remain unclear. This study was performed to investigate the factors affecting exercise capacity in heart transplantation recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with cardiomyopathy were enrolled in this study. We measured peak exercise oxygen uptake (peak VO(2)) in seven patients (age range: 42 +/- 14 yr) 10-28 months after transplantation, in seven patients (age range: 33 +/- 18 yr) with dilated cardiomyopathy before heart transplantation, and in 14 healthy control subjects (age range: 44 +/- 12 yr). The left ventricular ejection fraction, Beck Depression Inventory score, Medical Outcome Health Survey Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) results, and immunosuppressive therapy administered were recorded in all patient groups.

RESULTS

All patients in the post-transplantation group terminated exercise testing before the anaerobic threshold because of general fatigue. All heart transplantation recipients exhibited a left ventricular ejection fraction within the normal range (mean +/- SD = 57% +/- 2%). The peak VO(2) mean values were significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.001). There were statistically significant correlations between the peak VO(2) values and the Beck Depression Inventory scores (r = -0.637, p = 0.01), between the peak VO(2) values and bodily pain (r = 0.717, p = 0.006), between the peak VO(2) values and general health perceptions (r = 0.706, p = 0.007), and between peak VO(2) values and postoperative duration (r = 0.843, p = 0.03) in all patient groups.

CONCLUSION

In the long-term treatment of heart transplant recipients, exercise training should be considered an important therapeutic tool that enables patients to achieve a good quality of life.