Feasibility of patient immobilization for conventional cranial irradiation with a relocatable stereotactic frame

Clinical Implementation of Adaptive Helical Tomotherapy: A Unique Approach to Image-Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Image-guided IMRT is a revolutionary concept whose clinical implementation is rapidly evolving. Methods of executing beam intensity modulation have included individually designed compensators, static multi-leaf collimators (MLC), dynamic MLC, and sequential (serial) tomotherapy. We have developed helical tomotherapy as an innovative solution to overcome some of the limitations of other IMRT systems. The unique physical design of helical tomotherapy allows the realization of the concepts of adaptive radiotherapy and conformal avoidance. In principle, these advances should improve normal tissue sparing and permit dose reconstruction and verification, thereby allowing significant biologically effective dose escalation.

Recent radiobiological findings can be translated into altered fractionation schemes that aim to improve the local control and long-term survival. This strategy is being tested at the University of Wisconsin using helical tomotherapy with its highly precise delivery and verification system along with meticulous and practical forms of immobilization. Innovative techniques such optical guidance, respiratory gating, and ultrasound assessments are being designed and tailored for helical tomotherapy use. The intrinsic capability of helical tomotherapy for megavoltage CT (MVCT) imaging for IMRT image-guidance is being optimized.

The unique features of helical tomotherapy might allow implementation of image-guided IMRT that was previously impossible or impractical. Here we review the technological, physical, and radiobiological rationale for the ongoing and upcoming clinical trials that will use image-guided IMRT in the form of helical tomotherapy; and we describe our plans for testing our hypotheses in a rigorous prospective fashion.

Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for optic nerve sheath meningiomas

AIMS

To assess visual outcome, tumour control and treatment-related morbidity in patients with optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSMs) treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 45 patients (13 men and 32 women, median age 46 years) with ONSMs (51 optic nerves involved) treated in a single institution between 1997 and 2010 was carried out. FSRT was delivered to a dose of 50 Gy in 30 or 33 fractions as primary treatment in 39 patients and after surgery in six patients.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1-13 years), the tumour control in 41 evaluable patients (four were lost to follow-up) was 100% at 5 years with no subsequent local or distant recurrence. Of the 46 evaluable optic nerves treated, 41 had residual vision (38 with impaired vision) before radiotherapy and five were blind in one eye. There was no recovery of vision in any of the blind eyes. Of 41 optic nerves with residual vision, 13 had improvement, 24 remained stable and four deteriorated; two patients (4%) developed radiation retinopathy. One patient developed a central retinal artery occlusion in the untreated eye 10 years after treatment.

CONCLUSION

FSRT is highly effective at controlling the growth of ONSMs with improvement or stabilisation of visual deficit in 89% of the optic nerves retaining some vision, albeit with a small risk of radiation-induced retinopathy. The results support the use of FSRT as an effective approach in the management of ONSM. The lack of functional benefit in patients with severe visual impairment would argue for earlier institution of treatment before complete visual loss is established.

Clinical results of a pilot study on stereovision-guided stereotactic radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy

Real-time stereovision-guidance has been introduced for efficient and convenient fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) and image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This first pilot study is to clinically evaluate its accuracy and precision as well as impact on treatment doses. Sixty-one FSR patients wearing stereotactic masks (SMs) and nine IMRT patients wearing flexible masks (FMs), were accrued. Daily target reposition was initially based-on biplane-radiographs and then adjusted in six degrees of freedom under real-time stereovision guidance. Mean and standard deviation of the head displacements measured the accuracy and precision. Head positions during beam-on times were measured with real-time stereovisions and used for determination of delivered doses. Accuracy ± ± precision in direction with the largest errors shows improvement from 0.4 ± 2.3 mm to 0.0 ± 1.0 mm in the inferior-to-superior direction for patients wearing SM or from 0.8 ± 4.3 mm to 0.4 ± 1.7 mm in the posterior-to-anterior direction for patients wearing FM. The image-guidance increases target volume coverage by >30% for small lesions. Over half of head position errors could be removed from the stereovision-guidance. Importantly, the technique allows us to check head position during beam-on time and makes it possible for having frameless head refixation without tight masks.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for skull base tumors: analysis of treatment accuracy using a stereotactic mask fixation system

Background

To assess the accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) using a stereotactic mask fixation system.

Patients and Methods

Sixteen patients treated with FSRT were involved in the study. A commercial stereotactic mask fixation system (BrainLAB AG) was used for patient immobilization. Serial CT scans obtained before and during FSRT were used to assess the accuracy of patient immobilization by comparing the isocenter position. Daily portal imaging were acquired to establish day to day patient position variation. Displacement errors along the different directions were calculated as combination of systematic and random errors.

Results

The mean isocenter displacements based on localization and verification CT imaging were 0.1 mm (SD 0.3 mm) in the lateral direction, 0.1 mm (SD 0.4 mm) in the anteroposterior, and 0.3 mm (SD 0.4 mm) in craniocaudal direction. The mean 3D displacement was 0.5 mm (SD 0.4 mm), being maximum 1.4 mm. No significant differences were found during the treatment (P = 0.4). The overall isocenter displacement as calculated by 456 anterior and lateral portal images were 0.3 mm (SD 0.9 mm) in the mediolateral direction, -0.2 mm (SD 1 mm) in the anteroposterior direction, and 0.2 mm (SD 1.1 mm) in the craniocaudal direction. The largest displacement of 2.7 mm was seen in the cranio-caudal direction, with 95% of displacements < 2 mm in any direction.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the setup error of the presented mask system evaluated by CT verification scans and portal imaging are minimal. Reproducibility of the isocenter position is in the best range of positioning reproducibility reported for other stereotactic systems.

The reproducibility of a HeadFix relocatable fixation system: analysis using the stereotactic coordinates of bilateral incus and the top of the crista galli obtained from a serial CT scan

We analysed the repositioning accuracy of bite-plate fixations from serial QA-CT (quality-assurance CT) taken during the course of stereotactic radiotherapy. A total of 72 series of CT examinations from 15 consecutive patients, who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy for various intracranial tumours, were examined. Three or four CT scans were obtained for the purpose of QA for the right and left incus, as well as the crista galli. The stereotactic coordinates of the centres of the incus and the top of the crista galli were semi-automatically obtained for each QA-CT scan. Positional displacements for these anatomical reference points and the centre of the points were obtained. The mean displacements for these points in the 3D directions ranged from -0.10 to 0.08 mm (standard deviations: 0.44-0.94). The absolute positional displacement ranged from 0.93 to 1.09 mm (standard deviations: 0.52-0.88 mm). The rotations of the head were 0.49+/-0.36 degrees. Our 3D measurement technique using anatomical landmarks revealed excellent stability of the mouthpiece fixation system in terms of translational and rotational displacements. This technique can also be used as a QA method for other fixation devices.

Report on a randomized trial comparing two forms of immobilization of the head for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) requires accurate and reproducible immobilization of the patient's head. This randomized study compared the efficacy of two commonly used forms of immobilization used for SRT. Two routinely used methods of immobilization, which differ in their approach to reproduce the head position from day to day, are the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame and the BrainLab thermoplastic mask. The GTC frame fixates on the patient's upper dentition and thus is in direct mechanical contact with the cranium. The BrainLab mask is a two-part masking system custom fitted to the front and back of the patient's head. After patients signed an IRB-approved informed consent form, eligible patients were randomized to either GTC frame or mask for their course of SRT. Patients were treated as per standard procedure; however, prior to each treatment a set of digital kilovolt images (ExacTrac, BrainLabAB, Germany) was taken. These images were fused with reference digitally reconstructed radiographs obtained from treatment planning CT to yield lateral, longitudinal, and vertical deviations of isocenter and head rotations about respective axes. The primary end point of the study was to compare the two systems with respect to mean and standard deviations using the distance to isocenter measure. A total of 84 patients were enrolled (69 patients evaluable with detailed positioning data). A mixed-effect linear regression and two-tiled t test were used to compare the distance measure for both the systems. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference between mean distances for these systems, suggesting that the GTC frame was more accurate. The mean 3D displacement and standard deviations were 3.17+1.95 mm for mask and 2.00+1.04 mm for frame. Both immobilization techniques were highly effective, but the GTC frame was more accurate. To optimize the accuracy of SRT, daily kilovolt image guidance is recommended with either immobilization system.

Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy following conservative surgery in the control of craniopharyngiomas

PURPOSE

To describe the technique and results of stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients with craniopharyngioma after conservative surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-nine patients with craniopharyngioma aged 3-68 years (median age 18 years) were treated with SCRT between June 1994 and January 2003. All patients were referred for radiotherapy after undergoing one or more surgical procedures. Treatment was delivered in 30-33 daily fractions over 6-6.5 weeks to a total dose of 50 Gy using 6 MV photons. Outcome was assessed prospectively.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 40 months (range 3-88 months) the 3- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 97% and 92%, and 3- and 5-year survival 100%. Two patients required further debulking surgery for progressive disease 8 and 41 months after radiotherapy. Twelve patients (30%) had acute clinical deterioration due to cystic enlargement of craniopharyngioma following SCRT and required cyst aspiration. One patient with severe visual impairment prior to radiotherapy had visual deterioration following SCRT. Seven out of 10 patients with a normal pituitary function before SCRT had no endocrine deficits following treatment.

CONCLUSION

SCRT as a high-precision technique of localized RT is suitable for the treatment of incompletely excised craniopharyngioma. The local control, toxicity and survival outcomes are comparable to results reported following conventional external beam RT. Longer follow-up is required to assess long-term efficacy and toxicity, particularly in terms of potential reduction in treatment related late toxicity.

Rotational and translational reproducibility of newly developed Leksell frame-based relocatable fixation system

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate three-dimensional movement of the cranium in a relocatable frame using positions of anatomical landmarks obtained from repeated quality-assurance (QA) computed tomography (CT) studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 17 series of QA-CT data representing five patients who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of acoustic neurinoma. Helical-CT scans with 1-mm collimation were obtained at the time of treatment planning and during the course of treatment. The right and left short processes of the incus and the top of the crista galli were used as the three anatomical reference points.

RESULTS

Fluctuations in distance among the reference points were all <1 mm. The translational displacements for these points were <2 mm, with standard deviations (SD) of <2 mm. A plane that included all three reference points was defined as the reference plane. To investigate the direction of cranial rotation for each QA-CT scan, unit normal vectors of the reference plane were obtained. Three-dimensional analyses indicated that cranial rotation was greatest along the X-axis, followed by the Y-axis, with the least rotation along the Z-axis.

CONCLUSION

The result suggested that movement of the craniocaudal axis in the sagittal plane was a major factor behind displacement of the cranium.

Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for secreting and nonsecreting pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the medium-term outcome in a cohort of patients with residual or recurrent pituitary adenoma treated with fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients (median age 50 years) with a residual or recurrent nonfunctioning (67) or a secreting (25) pituitary adenoma were treated between 1995 and 2003. Eighteen patients had a GH-secreting, five PRL-secreting and two an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Vision was impaired in 39 patients, with visual field deficit (35) and/or reduced visual acuity (25). Sixty-four patients had partial or complete hypopituitarism before SCRT. The treatment was delivered stereotactically by four noncoplanar conformal fixed fields using a 6-MV linear accelerator to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 32 months (range 4-108) the 1, 3 and 5 years actuarial progression-free survival is 99%, 98% and 98%, and overall survival is 98%. Three patients recurred 5 months, 1 year and 9 years after SCRT requiring surgery. In secreting adenomas, hormone levels declined progressively, becoming normal in more than a third of patients with GH-secreting and PRL-secreting pituitary tumours. 50% of baseline GH level was achieved in just under 2 years. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal acute toxicity. Hypopituitarism was the most common long-term effect; 22% of patients had worsening of pituitary function. One patient developed unilateral quadrantopia without tumour progression.

CONCLUSION

SCRT as a high-precision technique of localized irradiation achieves tumour and hormone control of pituitary adenomas comparable with previously published data on the efficacy of conventional radiotherapy. Despite the potential advantage of reducing the volume of normal brain irradiated, the theoretical benefit over conventional radiotherapy in terms of the reduction in long-term morbidity has not yet been demonstrated and requires longer follow-up. Potential effect on long-term cognitive function has not been tested.

Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 68

Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems (ISPSs) are used to position patients prior to precise radiation treatment of localized lesions of the brain. Often, the lesion is located in close proximity to critical anatomic features whose functions should be maintained. Many types of ISPSs have been described in the literature and are commercially available. These are briefly reviewed. ISPS systems provide two critical functions. The first is to establish a coordinate system upon which a guided therapy can be applied. The second is to provide a method to reapply the coordinate system to the patient such that the coordinates assigned to the patient's anatomy are identical from application to application. Without limiting this study to any particular approach to ISPSs, this report introduces nomenclature and suggests performance tests to quantify both the stability of the ISPS to map diagnostic data to a coordinate system, as well as the ISPS's ability to be realigned to the patient's anatomy. For users who desire to develop a new ISPS system, it may be necessary for the clinical team to establish the accuracy and precision of each of these functions. For commercially available systems that have demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy and precision, the clinical team may need to demonstrate local ability to apply the system in a manner consistent with that employed during the published testing. The level of accuracy and precision required of an individual ISPS system is dependent upon the clinical protocol (e.g., fractionation, margin, pathology, etc.). Each clinical team should provide routine quality assurance procedures that are sufficient to support the assumptions of accuracy and precision used during the planning process. The testing of ISPS systems can be grouped into two broad categories, type testing, which occurs prior to general commercialization, and site testing, performed when a commercial system is installed at a clinic. Guidelines to help select the appropriate tests as well as recommendations to help establish the required frequency of testing are provided. Because of the broad scope of different systems, it is important that both the manufacturer and user rigorously critique the system and set QA tests appropriate to the particular device and its possible weaknesses. Major recommendations of the Task Group include: introduction of a new nomenclature for reporting repositioning accuracy; comprehensive analysis of patient characteristics that might adversely affect positioning accuracy; performance of testing immediately before each treatment to establish that there are no gross positioning errors; a general request to the Medical Physics community for improved QA tools; implementation of weekly portal imaging (perhaps cone beam CT in the future) as a method of tracking fractionated patients (as per TG 40); and periodic routine reviews of positioning accuracy.

Treatment accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the geometric accuracy of the delivery of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for brain tumours using the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) relocatable frame. Accuracy of treatment delivery was measured via portal images acquired with an amorphous silicon based electronic portal imager (EPI). Results were used to assess the existing verification process and to review the current margins used for the expansion of clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were immobilized in a GTC frame. Target volume definition was performed on localization CT and MRI scans and a CTV to PTV margin of 5mm (based on initial experience) was introduced in 3D. A Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) fiducial system was used for stereotactic coordinate definition. The existing verification process consisted of an intercomparison of the coordinates of the isocentres and anatomy between the localization and verification CT scans. Treatment was delivered with 6 MV photons using four fixed non-coplanar conformal fields using a multi-leaf collimator. Portal imaging verification consisted of the acquisition of orthogonal images centred through the treatment isocentre. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) created from the CT localization scans were used as reference images. Semi-automated matching software was used to quantify set up deviations (displacements and rotations) between reference and portal images.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty six anterior and 123 lateral portal images were available for analysis for set up deviations. For displacements, the total errors in the cranial/caudal direction were shown to have the largest SD's of 1.2 mm, while systematic and random errors reached SD's of 1.0 and 0.7 mm, respectively, in the cranial/caudal direction. The corresponding data for rotational errors (the largest deviation was found in the sagittal plane) was 0.7 degrees SD (total error), 0.5 degrees (systematic) and 0.5 degrees (random). The total 3D displacement was 1.8 mm (mean), 0.8 mm (SD) with a range of 0.3-3.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal imaging has shown that the existing verification and treatment delivery techniques currently in use result in highly reproducible setups. Random and systematic errors in the treatment planning and delivery chain will always occur, but monitoring and minimising them is an essential component of quality control. Portal imaging provides fast and accurate facility for monitoring patients on treatment and the results of this study have shown that a reduction in CTV to PTV margin from 5 to 4 mm (resulting in a considerable increase in the volume of normal tissue sparing) could be made.

Commissioning and clinical results utilizing the Gildenberg-Laitinen Adapter Device for X-ray in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The Gildenberg-Laitinen Adapter Device for X-Ray (GLAD-X/LS) frame is a positioning device that allows the use of the same fiducial points as the Brown-Robert-Wells (BRW) system. Thus it permits treatment planning to be accomplished by the Radionics X-knife Radiosurgery Program. We investigated the commissioning and clinical benefits of the GLAD-X/LS for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients who were unable to tolerate the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Commissioning of the GLAD-X/LS system was done via use of a Rando Phantom. A target volume of 2 x 2 x 2 cm was drilled into the phantom head. An ion chamber and thermoluminescence dosimetric chips (TLDs) were implanted in the target. A simulated treatment course consisting of 5 stereotactic radiotherapy fractions (300 cGy, 30 mm collimator) was delivered to the phantom head. A total of 27 patients who could not tolerate the GTC frame were treated using the GLAD-X/LS system. A total of 35 isocenters were used; the median number of treatment fractions was eight. Reproducibility of the x, y, and z coordinates was examined and correlated to the same determined using orthogonal port films. Relocation accuracy and reproducibility were further assessed comparing the x, y, and z coordinates of the target center with multiplanar reconstructed coronal and sagittal images. Patient tolerance of the device was also evaluated daily throughout the treatment.

RESULTS

The measured TLD and ion chamber doses were within 3% of the prescribed dose at the isocenter. The same dose accuracy was also found at incremental distances of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm from the isocenter. All patients tolerated the treatment and the device well. Six patients experienced mild ear canal pain, and softer or smaller earpieces were substituted. The mean relocation accuracy was 1.5 mm +/- 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

The GLAD-X/LS system has excellent accuracy and reproducibility with the mean relocation accuracy of 1.5 mm +/- 0.8. The device is well-tolerated by patients, with no significant complications. Larger scale studies are necessary before routine use can be recommended for the administration of FSRT.

Isocenter accuracy in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy using implanted fiducials

PURPOSE

The stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) system verifies isocenter accuracy in patient space. In this study, we evaluate isocenter accuracy in frameless SRT using implanted cranial gold markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed frameless SRT on 43 intracranial tumor patients between August 1997 and December 2000. The treatment technique was determined by the tumor shape and volume, and by the location of critical organs. The coordinates of anterior-posterior and lateral port film were inputted to ISOLOC software, which calculated (1) the couch moves translation distance required to bring the target point to the isocenter, and (2) the intermarker distance comparisons between the CT study and the treatment machine films. We evaluated the isocenter deviation based on the error between orthogonal film target coordinates and isocenter coordinates.

RESULTS

The mean treatment isocenter deviations (x, y, z) were -0.03, 0.14, and -0.04 mm, respectively. The systematic component isocenter standard deviations were 0.28, 0.31, and 0.35 mm (1 SD), respectively, and the random component isocenter standard deviations were 0.53, 0.52, and 0.50 mm (1 SD), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The isocenter accuracy in the frameless SRT-implanted fiducial system is highly reliable and is comparable to that of other stereotactic radiosurgery systems.

Quantitative analysis of errors in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) offers a technique to minimize the absorbed dose to normal tissues; therefore, quality assurance is essential for these procedures. In this study, quality assurance for FSRT of 58 cases, between August 1995 and August 1997 are described, and the errors for each step and overall accuracy were estimated. Some of the important items for FSRT procedures are: accuracy in CT localization, transferred image distortion, laser alignment, isocentric accuracy of linear accelerator, head frame movement, portal verification, and various human errors. A geometric phantom, that has known coordinates was used to estimate the accuracy of CT localization. A treatment planning computer was used for checking the transferred image distortion. The mechanical isocenter standard (MIS), rectilinear phantom pointer: (RLPP), and laser target localizer frame (LTLF) were used for laser alignment and target coordinates setting. Head-frame stability check was performed by a depth confirmation helmet (DCH). A film test was done to check isocentric accuracy and portal verification. All measured data for the 58 patients were recorded and analyzed for each item. 4-MV x-rays from a linear accelerator, were used for FSRT, along with homemade circular cones with diameters from 20 to 70 mm (interval: 5 mm). The accuracy in CT localization was 1.2+/-0.5 mm. The isocentric accuracy of the linear accelerator, including laser alignment, was 0.5+/-0.2 mm. The reproducibility of the head frame was 1.1+/-0.6 mm. The overall accuracy was 1.7+/-0.7 mm, excluding human errors.

Accuracy of a relocatable stereotactic radiotherapy head frame evaluated by use of a depth helmet

In high precision radiotherapy, the more accurately the patient can be relocated, the smaller the clinical to planning target volume margin can be, with reduction in the volume of normal tissue irradiated. The Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) relocatable stereotactic head frame provides immobilization of the patient which is highly reproducible. A depth helmet and measuring probe were used to confirm the accuracy of relocation of 31 patients treated in the GTC frame. The measurements were processed in a spreadsheet developed to calculate the size of the patient's displacement as a vector. Twenty-seven patients received fractionated stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy, and 4 single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery, amounting to 564 measurement episodes. The accuracy was extremely good, and considerably more accurate than standard thermoplastic head shells. Ninety-two percent of the displacement vectors were less than 2 mm, and 97% less than 2.5 mm. Considering each dimension separately, the largest mean displacement was 0.4 mm in the superior-inferior direction. Accuracy was constant through a fractionated course for most patients, but prediction based on measurements from the first few fractions was not reliable. Results were dependent on patient selection, with worse reproducibility in patients with neurological deficits, or difficulty cooperating. The depth helmet measurements detected a loosened mouth bite in one patient and allowed repositioning to be verified without the need for the simulator. Total treatment time, including use of the depth helmet to verify treatment position, is quicker (mean 15.7 min) than using portal films. The depth helmet, used in conjunction with the vector displacement spreadsheet, provides a simple way to define the CTV-PTV margin. For fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy we use a 3 mm CTV-PTV margin. This system could assist technology transfer to centres starting stereotactic radiotherapy using the GTC frame.

Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans show radiation dose distribution that is highly conformal to the target volume. The successful clinical implementation of these radiotherapy modalities requires precise positioning of the target to avoid a geographical miss. Effective reduction in target positional inaccuracies can be achieved with the proper use of immobilization devices. This paper reviews some of the immobilization devices that have been used and/or have the potential of being used for IMRT. The immobilization devices being reviewed include stereotactic frame, Talon system, thermoplastic molds, Alpha Cradles, and Vac-Lok system. The implementation of these devices at various anatomical sites is discussed.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment planning and delivery for low- and intermediate-grade gliomas

Three-Dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT) planning and delivery is an external beam radiation therapy modality that has the general goal of conforming the shape of a prescribed dose volume to the shape of a 3-dimensional target volume, simultaneously limiting dose to critical normal structures. 3-Dimensional conformal therapy should include at least one volumetric imaging study of the patient. This image should be obtained in the treatment position for visualizing the target and normal anatomic structures that are potentially within the irradiated volume. Most often, computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used; however, recently, other imaging modalities such as functional MRI, MR spectroscopy, and positron emission tomography (PET) scans have been used to visualize the clinically relevant volumes. This article will address the clinically relevant issues with regard to low- and intermediate-grade gliomas and the role of 3D-CRT planning. Specific issues that will be addressed will include normal tissue tolerance, target definition, treatment field design in regard to isodose curves and dose-volume histograms, and immobilization.

Comparison of the accuracy of positioning devices for radiation therapy of canine and feline head tumors

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the repositioning accuracy of different positioning devices in order to determine their applicability for potential use in conformal radiation therapy for animals. Forty-four animals with spontaneous tumors of the head were included. The animals were divided into 3 groups determined according to the positioning device used. Group 1 animals were positioned using a thermoplastic mask. Group 2 animals were positioned using a head holder. Group 3 animals were positioned using the head holder and an inflatable pillow. The time of presentation determined which position device was used. Port films of the 44 patients were reviewed retrospectively, and the repositioning precision was recorded by measurements in three orthogonal planes. Groups 2 and 3 had significantly better repositioning accuracy (P < or = 0.05) compared to Group 1. The position variation was not significantly different (P < or = 0.05) between Groups 2 and 3 in the lateral and longitudinal direction. Group 3 had a median reposition variation of 0.5 to 1.0 mm, with a standard deviation of 1.0 to 1.5 mm.

Stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: technique and preliminary experience

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) is a high precision technique of fractionated radiotherapy which ensures accurate delivery of radiation with reduction in the volume of normal tissue irradiated as compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy. We describe the technique and preliminary experience of SCRT in patients with residual and recurrent pituitary adenomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1995 and March 1999, 22 patients (mean age: 45.3, range: 20-67 years) with residual or recurrent pituitary adenomas (13 nonfunctioning, nine secretory) were treated with SCRT. All were immobilized in a relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame and tumour was localized on a postcontrast planning computerized tomography (CT) and MRI scan. The gross tumour volume (GTV) and the critical structures were outlined on contiguous 2-3 mm separated slices. A margin of 5 mm (12 patients) to 10 mm (10 patients) was grown around GTV in three-dimensions (3-D) to generate the planning target volume (PTV). The treatment was delivered by three (five patients) and four (17 patients) maximally separated conformal fixed fields with each field conformed to the shape of the tumour using customized lead alloy blocks (19 patients) or multileaf collimator (three patients). The patients were treated on a 6-MV linear accelerator to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions (18 patients) and 50 Gy in 30 fractions (four patients).

RESULTS

The technique of SCRT has become a part of the routine work of the radiotherapy department. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal acute toxicity. One patient developed transient quadrantanopia 2 weeks after treatment with full recovery after a short course of corticosteroids. One patient had a transient visual deterioration 7 months after treatment due to cystic degeneration of the tumour which fully recovered following surgical decompression. Nine of the 15 patients presenting with visual impairment had improvement after treatment and the visual status remained stable in all others. One patient with acromegaly and one with a prolactinoma achieved normalization of elevated hormonal abnormality four and 10 months after SCRT, respectively. The remaining seven patients with a secretory adenoma had declining hormone levels at last follow-up. Newly initiated hormone replacement therapy was required in five patients. At a median follow-up of 9 months (range 1-44 months), the 1 and 2 year actuarial progression free and overall survival were 100%.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic conformal radiotherapy is a high precision technique suitable for the treatment of pituitary adenomas requiring radiotherapy. Preliminary results suggest effective tumour control and low toxicity within the range expected for conventional external beam radiotherapy. While the technique is of potential benefit in reducing the volume of normal brain irradiated, the advantages in terms of sustained tumour control and reduced toxicity over conventional radiotherapy need to be demonstrated in long-term prospective studies.

Optimization of stereotactically-guided conformal treatment planning of sellar and parasellar tumors, based on normal brain dose volume histograms

PURPOSE

To investigate the optimal treatment plan for stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) of sellar and parasellar lesions, with respect to sparing normal brain tissue, in the context of routine treatment delivery, based on dose volume histogram analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Computed tomography (CT) data sets for 8 patients with sellar- and parasellar-based tumors (6 pituitary adenomas and 2 meningiomas) have been used in this study. Treatment plans were prepared for 3-coplanar and 3-, 4-, 6-, and 30-noncoplanar-field arrangements to obtain 95% isodose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) for each plan. Conformal shaping was achieved by customized blocks generated with the beams eye view (BEV) facility. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were calculated for the normal brain (excluding the PTV), and comparisons made for normal tissue sparing for all treatment plans at > or =80%, > or =60%, and > or =40% of the prescribed dose.

RESULTS

The mean volume of normal brain receiving > or =80% and > or =60% of the prescribed dose decreased by 22.3% (range 14.8-35.1%, standard deviation sigma = 7.5%) and 47.6% (range 25.8-69.1%, sigma = 13.2%), respectively, with a 4-field noncoplanar technique when compared with a conventional 3-field coplanar technique. Adding 2 further fields, from 4-noncoplanar to 6-noncoplanar fields reduced the mean normal brain volume receiving > or =80% of the prescribed dose by a further 4.1% (range -6.5-11.8%, sigma = 6.4%), and the volume receiving > or =60% by 3.3% (range -5.5-12.2%, sigma = 5.4%), neither of which were statistically significant. Each case must be considered individually however, as a wide range is seen in the volume spared when increasing the number of fields from 4 to 6. Comparing the 4- and 6-field noncoplanar techniques to a 30-field conformal field approach (simulating a dynamic arc plan) revealed near-equivalent normal tissue sparing.

CONCLUSION

Four to six widely spaced, fixed-conformal fields provide the optimum class solution for the treatment of sellar and parasellar lesions, both in terms of normal brain tissue sparing and providing a relatively straightforward patient setup. Increasing the number of fields did not result in further significant sparing, with no clear benefit from techniques approaching dynamic conformal radiotherapy in the cases examined.

Daily positioning accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiation therapy with a fusion of computed tomography and linear accelerator (focal) unit: evaluation of z-axis with a z-marker

To evaluate quantitative positioning errors of frameless stereotactic radiation therapy with a fusion of computed tomography (CT) and linear accelerator unit, Z-type CT markers were attached to patients, and CT images were obtained before and after daily treatment. In 40 verification tests, geometrical errors were never more than 1 mm.

Stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy for meningiomas

PURPOSE

Stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy, (SCRT) is a high precision technique of conformal radiotherapy (RT) which reduces the volume of normal tissue irradiated compared to conventional RT and may lead to a reduction in long-term toxicity We describe the technique and the preliminary results in patients with inoperable, residual or recurrent meningiomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From July 1993 to November 1997, 24 patients (median age: 56 years, range: 28-72) with base of skull (n = 21). falx or upper skull (n = 3) meningiomas were treated with SCRT. The technique employed immobilization in a Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame and CT localization with a Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) fiducial system for stereotactic space definition. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as gross tumour volume (GTV) and a 0.5-1 cm margin. Treatment was delivered with three (12 patients) or four non-coplanar conformal fixed fields (12 patients) Conformal blocking was achieved either with lead alloy blocks (n = 11) or with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) (n = 13). Patients were treated on a 6 MV linear accelerator to doses of 50-55 Gy, in 30-33 daily fractions. The treatments were carried out as part of a routine work of a busy radiotherapy department.

RESULTS

Median GTV for 24 meningiomas was 21.7 cm3 (range: 4.4-183 cm3). SCRT was well tolerated with minimal toxicity Three months after the end of radiotherapy, seven of 15 patients with neurological deficit had an improvement and eight remained unchanged. Two patients experienced early side effects (one VII nerve palsy, one Addisonian state). At a median follow-up of 13-months (range: 3-43) the 1 year progression free survival and overall survival are 100%. which is within the range expected for conventional fractionated radiotherapy for meningiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

SCRT is a feasible technique of high precision conformal RT for patients with meningiomas. Potential advantages in tumour control, survival and toxicity over conventional RT, require evaluation in long-term prospective studies.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: rationale and methods

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a widely accepted technique for the treatment intracranial neoplasms. Combined with modern imaging modalities, SRS has established its efficacy in a variety of indications. From the outset, however, it was recognized that the delivery of a single large dose of radiation was essentially "bad biology made better by good physics." To achieve the accuracy required to compensate for this biological shortcoming, the application of SRS has required that a neurosurgical head frame of some sort be rigidly attached to the patients head. Historically, this prerequisite has, primarily for practical reasons, precluded the delivery of multiple fractions over multiple days. With recent improvements in immobilization and repeat fixation, the good biology of fractionated delivery has been realized. This technique, which has come to be known as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has significantly expanded the efficacy of the technique through the use of accurate physical targeting coupled with the basic radiobiological principles gleaned from decades of clinical experience.

[Technical evolution of irradiation in stereotactic conditions: dose fractionation]

The development of non-invasive head fixation systems, allowing 3D determination of the target coordinates, has lead to the increased use of fractionated stereotactic irradiation. These systems have been checked for accuracy and the mean precision of repositioning has been evaluated to +/- 1 mm. With the mean geometrical accuracy set at +/- 1 mm, a 2 mm safety margin is usually added to the clinical target volume in order to define the planning target volume. Quality assurance procedures must conform to the required precision of the technique while remaining realistic in day-to-day use relative to planned conventional treatments. Biologically different from single dose irradiation, the fractionated stereotactic irradiation completes the range of techniques used in the treatment of intra-cerebral lesions.

CT simulation in stereotactic brain radiotherapy--analysis of isocenter reproducibility with mask fixation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

CT verification and measurement of isocenter deviation using repeated mask fixation in linac-based stereotactic high dose radiotherapy of brain metastases were performed in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases a commercial head mask fixation device based on thermoplastic materials (BrainLAB) was used. A two-step planning-treatment procedure was performed. Immediately before treatment the patient was relocated in the mask and a verification CT scan of the radiopaque marked isocenter was performed and if necessary its position was corrected. The verification procedure is described in detail. Twenty-two CT verifications in 16 patients were analyzed. Deviations were measured separately for each direction. A 3D-deviation vector was calculated. Additionally the average amount of deviation in each of the three dimensions was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean deviation and standard deviation (SD) of the isocenter was 0.4 mm (SD 1.5 mm) in the longitudinal direction, -0.1 mm (SD 1.8 mm) in the lateral direction and 0.1 mm (SD 1.2 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction. The mean three-dimensional distance (3D-vector) between the verified and the corrected isocenter was 2.4 mm (SD 1.3 mm). The average deviation (without consideration of direction) was 1.1 mm (SD 1.1 mm), 1.3 mm (SD 1.3 mm) and 0.8 mm (SD 0.9 mm) in the longitudinal, lateral and sagittal directions, respectively. No correlation was found between 3D-deviation and the distance of the isocenter from the reference plane nor between deviation and the position of metastases in the brain (central versus peripheral or between different lobes), or the date of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Reproducibility of the isocenter using the presented mask fixation is in the range of positioning reproducibility reported for other non-invasive fixation devices for stereotactic brain treatment. Our results underline the importance of CT verification as a quality assurance method in stereotactic radiotherapy. Under the condition of a preceding CT verification the mask can be used for single dose stereotactic radiotherapy. For fractionated stereotactic irradiation of small target volumes we recommend repeated CT verifications to assure reproducibility.

Radiosurgery/stereotactic external beam radiotherapy for malignant brain tumours: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience

SRT is a high-precision technique of radiotherapy which delivers focused irradiation to small target volumes. In the context of external beam radiotherapy it can be described as stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy. As the technique originated from neurosurgical technology, it has initially been limited to single fraction treatment. However, with the use of relocatable fixation devices the way ahead particularly in its application in the treatment of brain tumours is in fractionated SRT. Currently, single fraction SRT/radiosurgery is of proven value only in the treatment of small inoperable arteriovenous malformations. It is being exploited in the management of brain tumours but so far remains as experimental treatment. We have demonstrated that fractionated SRT in patients with gliomas is a non-invasive equivalent to brachytherapy and in patients with solitary metastases a non-invasive alternative to surgical excision. However, the treatment is not without side effects, and the long-term effectiveness and toxicity of SRT, particularly with the use of unconventional fractionation, is not defined. The future use of SRT in the treatment of brain tumours should not be guided simply by the technical possibilities but by a rational appraisal of all treatment options to achieve the best disease control, survival and toxicity. Although there is potential for benefit in a number of small tumours, SRT cannot at present be recommended as the primary treatment in any tumour. In addition, its use should be discouraged in the treatment of unbiopsied brain lesions and as the major form of treatment of pineal germinomas. The technology of stereotactic radiotherapy is evolving, and it is likely that SRT will be integrated into conventional radiotherapy practice to become simply a high-precision technique of radiotherapy delivery in everyday use.