1
|
Adam DP, Grudzinski JJ, Marsh IR, Hill PM, Cho SY, Bradshaw TJ, Longcor J, Burr A, Bruce JY, Harari PM, Bednarz BP. Voxel-Level Dosimetry for Combined Iodine 131 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Paradigms for Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1275-1284. [PMID: 38367914 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) shows promise as a method to increase tumor control and mitigate potential high-grade toxicities associated with re-treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. This work establishes a patient-specific dosimetry framework that combines Monte Carlo-based dosimetry from the 2 radiation modalities at the voxel level using deformable image registration (DIR) and radiobiological constructs for patients enrolled in a phase 1 clinical trial combining EBRT and RPT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Serial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) patient scans were performed at approximately 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours postinjection of 577.2 MBq/m2 (15.6 mCi/m2) CLR 131, an iodine 131-containing RPT agent. Using RayStation, clinical EBRT treatment plans were created with a treatment planning CT (TPCT). SPECT/CT images were deformably registered to the TPCT using the Elastix DIR module in 3D Slicer software and assessed by measuring mean activity concentrations and absorbed doses. Monte Carlo EBRT dosimetry was computed using EGSnrc. RPT dosimetry was conducted using RAPID, a GEANT4-based RPT dosimetry platform. Radiobiological metrics (biologically effective dose and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions) were used to combine the 2 radiation modalities. RESULTS The DIR method provided good agreement for the activity concentrations and calculated absorbed dose in the tumor volumes for the SPECT/CT and TPCT images, with a maximum mean absorbed dose difference of -11.2%. Based on the RPT absorbed dose calculations, 2 to 4 EBRT fractions were removed from patient EBRT treatments. For the combined treatment, the absorbed dose to target volumes ranged from 57.14 to 75.02 Gy. When partial volume corrections were included, the mean equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions to the planning target volume from EBRT + RPT differed -3.11% to 1.40% compared with EBRT alone. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates the clinical feasibility of performing combined EBRT + RPT dosimetry on TPCT scans. Dosimetry guides treatment decisions for EBRT, and this work provides a bridge for the same paradigm to be implemented within the rapidly emerging clinical RPT space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Adam
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph J Grudzinski
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Ian R Marsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Steve Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Tyler J Bradshaw
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Adam Burr
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Justine Y Bruce
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Paul M Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Bryan P Bednarz
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giraudet AL. [Combination of internal and external beam radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:754-758. [PMID: 37953187 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy and internal vectorized radiation therapy are two types of radiotherapy that can be used to treat cancer. They differ in the way they are administered, and the type of radiation used. Although they can be effective in treating cancer, they each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and their combination could be synergistic. Preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy have mainly used radiolabelled antibodies, whose bone marrow toxicity remains the limiting factor in increasing the administered activities. The use of small radioligands in clinical trials has shown to be better tolerated and more effective, which explains their rapid development. The results of preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy appear heterogeneous, making it impossible to determine an ideal therapeutic sequencing scheme, and complicating the transposition to clinical studies. The few clinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy available to date have demonstrated feasibility and tolerability. More work remains to be done in the fields of dosimetry and radiobiology, as well as in the sequencing of these two irradiation modalities to optimize their combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-L Giraudet
- Centre Léon-Bérard, 15, rue Gabriel-Sarrazin, 69008 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Sar ECA, Braat AJAT, van der Voort-van Zyp JRN, van der Veen BS, van Leeuwen PJ, de Vries-Huizing DMV, Hendrikx JMA, Lam MGEH, Vogel WV. Tolerability of concurrent external beam radiotherapy and [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for node-positive prostate cancer in treatment naïve patients, phase I study (PROQURE-I trial). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:268. [PMID: 36959540 PMCID: PMC10035228 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10725-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer patients with locoregional lymph node disease at diagnosis (N1M0) still have a limited prognosis despite the improvements provided by aggressive curative intent multimodal locoregional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with systemic androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Although some patients can be cured and the majority of patients have a long survival, the 5-year biochemical failure rate is currently 29-47%. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 has shown impressive clinical and biochemical responses with low toxicity in salvage setting in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This study aims to explore the combination of standard EBRT and ADT complemented with a single administration of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in curative intent treatment for N1M0 prostate cancer. Hypothetically, this combined approach will enhance EBRT to better control macroscopic tumour localizations, and treat undetected microscopic disease locations inside and outside EBRT fields. METHODS The PROQURE-I study is a multicenter prospective phase I study investigating standard of care treatment (7 weeks EBRT and 3 years ADT) complemented with one concurrent cycle (three, six, or nine GBq) of systemic [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 administered in week two of EBRT. A maximum of 18 patients with PSMA-positive N1M0 prostate cancer will be included. The tolerability of adding [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 will be evaluated using a Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) dose-escalation design. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a single cycle [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 when given concurrent with EBRT + ADT, defined as the occurrence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5.0 grade three or higher acute toxicity. Secondary objectives include: late toxicity at 6 months, dosimetric assessment, preliminary biochemical efficacy at 6 months, quality of life questionnaires, and pharmacokinetic modelling of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. DISCUSSION This is the first prospective study to combine EBRT and ADT with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in treatment naïve men with N1M0 prostate cancer, and thereby explores the novel application of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in curative intent treatment. It is considered likely that this study will confirm tolerability as the combined toxicity of these treatments is expected to be limited. Increased efficacy is considered likely since both individual treatments have proven high anti-tumour effect as mono-treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials, NCT05162573 . Registered 7 October 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée C A van der Sar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Betty S van der Veen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M A Hendrikx
- Department Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Verma P, Shukla N, Kumari S, Ansari M, Gautam NK, Patel GK. Cancer stem cell in prostate cancer progression, metastasis and therapy resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2023; 1878:188887. [PMID: 36997008 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most diagnosed malignancy in the men worldwide. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are the sub-population of cells present in the tumor which possess unique properties of self-renewal and multilineage differentiation thus thought to be major cause of therapy resistance, disease relapse, and mortality in several malignancies including PCa. CSCs have also been shown positive for the common stem cells markers such as ALDH EZH2, OCT4, SOX2, c-MYC, Nanog etc. Therefore, isolation and characterization of CSCs specific markers which may discriminate CSCs and normal stem cells are critical to selectively eliminate CSCs. Rapid advances in the field offers a theoretical explanation for many of the enduring uncertainties encompassing the etiology and an optimism for the identification of new stem-cell targets, development of reliable and efficient therapies in the future. The emerging reports have also provided unprecedented insights into CSCs plasticity, quiescence, renewal, and therapeutic response. In this review, we discuss the identification of PCa stem cells, their unique properties, stemness-driving pathways, new diagnostics, and therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hou C, Wu Q, Xu L, Cui R, Ou R, Li D, Xu Y. Exploiting the potential of extracellular vesicles as delivery vehicles for the treatment of melanoma. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:1054324. [DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1054324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma, the most aggressive skin cancer that originated from genetic mutations in the melanocytes, is still a troublesome medical problem under the current therapeutic approaches, which include surgical resection, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, immunotherapy, biochemotherapy and targeted therapy. Nanotechnology has significantly contributed to the development of cancer treatment in the past few years, among which extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized lipid bilayer vesicles secreted from almost all cells that play essential roles in many physiological and pathological processes. In terms of melanoma therapy, the unique physicochemical properties of EVs make them promising nanocarriers for drug transportation compared to other synthetic nanocarriers. Moreover, EVs can be further engineered to maximize their drug delivery potential. Herein, in this minireview, we gave a brief overview of EV-based drug delivery strategies for melanoma therapy, in which different therapeutics delivered via EVs were summarized. We also highlighted the current progress of the EV-based delivery platform for melanoma therapy in clinical trials. The obstacles to applying exosomes in clinical practice toward further translation of EVs melanoma therapy were also discussed at the end. In summary, EVs offer promising prospects for melanoma therapy, whilst the ways for unlocking EVs’ full potential in melanoma therapies should be further investigated by solving relevant issues which hamper EVs-based melanoma therapy translation in the future.
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang KCY, Chiang SF, Chang HY, Chen WTL, Yang PC, Chen TW, Liang JA, Shiau AC, Ke TW, Clifford Chao KS. Engineered sTRAIL-armed MSCs overcome STING deficiency to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy for immune checkpoint blockade. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:610. [PMID: 35835756 PMCID: PMC9283452 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05069-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) mainly elicits antitumor immunity via the cGAS/STING axis for type I interferon (IFN) production. However, dysregulation of cGAS/STING constrains radiotherapy-induced antitumor immunity and type I IFN-dependent cell death and is associated with shorter survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Due to their tumor tropism, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown the potential to deliver therapeutic genes for cancer therapy. Here, we showed that MSCs enhance the sensitivity to RT by inducing TRAIL-dependent cell death and remodel the tumor microenvironment by recruiting CD8+ immune cells to upregulate PD-L1 in the tumor. By engineering MSCs to express CRC-specific soluble TRAIL via adenovirus-associated virus 2 (AAV2), we found that the therapeutic activity of MSC-sTRAIL was superior to that of MSCs alone when combined with RT. Combined treatment with MSC-sTRAIL and RT significantly reduced cell viability and increased apoptosis by inducing TRAIL-dependent cell death in STING-deficient colorectal cancer cells. MSC-sTRAIL directly triggered TRAIL-dependent cell death to overcome the deficiency of the cGAS/STING axis. Moreover, these combination treatments of MSC-sTRAIL and RT significantly remodeled the tumor microenvironment, which was more suitable for anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. Taken together, this therapeutic strategy represents a novel targeted treatment option for patients with colorectal cancer, especially cGAS/STING-deficient patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Chih-Yang Huang
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
- Translation Research Core, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
| | - Shu-Fen Chiang
- Lab of Precision Medicine, Feng-Yuan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taichung, 42055, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yu Chang
- Translation Research Core, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
- Proton Therapy and Science Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - William Tzu-Liang Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University HsinChu Hospital, China Medical University, HsinChu, 302, Taiwan, Taiwan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Chen Yang
- Proton Therapy and Science Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Wei Chen
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Pathology, Asia University Hospital, Asia University, Taichung, 41354, Taiwan
| | - Ji-An Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - An-Cheng Shiau
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tao-Wei Ke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine & Graduate Institute of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - K S Clifford Chao
- Proton Therapy and Science Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Graves SA, Martin M, Tiwari A, Merrick MJ, Sunderland JJ. SIR-Spheres activity measurements reveal systematic miscalibration. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1131-1135. [PMID: 34992155 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate dosimetry-guided radiopharmaceutical therapy fundamentally relies on knowledge of the quantity of radioactivity administered to patients. The purpose of this work was to perform an independent and NIST-traceable activity measurement of 90Y SIR-Spheres®. Methods: Gamma spectroscopic measurements of the 90Y internal pair production decay mode were made using a high-purity germanium detector. Un-modified patient SIR-Spheres® vials were placed within a high-density polyethylene source holder positioned at a distance of 210 cm from the detector, with acquisition durations of 3 - 6 hours. Measured annihilation radiation detection rates were corrected for radioactive decay during acquisition, dead time, source attenuation, and source geometry effects. Detection efficiency was determined by two independent and NIST-traceable methods. Resulting 90Y activity measurements were compared against the manufacturer activity calibration. Results: Measured SIR-Sphere® vials (n = 5) were found to contain more activity than specified by the manufacturer calibration - on average the ratio of measured activity to calibrated was 1.233 ± 0.030. Activity measurements made using two distinct efficiency calibration methods were found to agree within 1%. Uncertainty in individual measurements was dominated by counting statistical uncertainty (~2.5%), uncertainty in the internal pair production branching ratio of 90Y (1.5%), and efficiency calibration (1.2% - 1.9%). Conclusion: The primary SIR-Spheres® activity calibration appears to be a significant underestimate of true activity. This mis-calibration has likely been consistent for as long as the SIR-Sphere® product has been available. This finding should be independently verified, and steps should be taken by the manufacturer to establish an accurate and traceable activity standard.
Collapse
|
8
|
Freudenberg R, Hartmann H, Andreeff M, Oehme L, Leichtner T, Fischer A, Paulus T, Krause M, Kotzerke J. [Treatment Planning and Dose Verification for Combined Internal and External Radiotherapy (CIERT)]. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 61:49-57. [PMID: 34844272 DOI: 10.1055/a-1650-9428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
AIM The combined internal and external radiotherapy (CIERT) take advantage of the benefits from radionuclide therapy and external beam irradiation. These include steep dose gradients and a low toxicity to normal tissue due to the use of unsealed radioisotopes as well as homogeneous dose distribution within the tumor due to external beam irradiation. For a combined irradiation planning, an infrastructure has to be developed that takes into account the dose contributions from both modalities. A physical verification of the absorbed dose distribution should follow by measurements using OSL detectors. METHOD Internal irradiation was performed using Re-188 in a cylindrical phantom with three inserts. SPECT images were acquired to calculate the internal dose using the software STRATOS. The dose distribution was exported as DICOM-RT data and imported in the software Pinnacle. Based on the internal dose distribution the external irradiation using 6 MV photons was planned. The dose contributions of both modalities separately as well as for combined irradiation was measured using OSL detectors made out of Beryllium oxide. RESULTS The planed doses of combined irradiation (1 Gy, 2 Gy, 4 Gy) could be verified within the uncertainty of the detectors. The mean energy response to Re-188 was (88.6 ± 2.4) % with respect to the calibration with 200 kV X-ray irradiation. The energy response to 6 MV photons was (146.0 ± 4.9) %. CONCLUSION A workflow for the treatment planning of combined internal and external radiotherapy has been developed and tested. Measurements verified the calculated doses. Therefore, the physical and technical basis for the dosimetry of combined irradiation were worked out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Freudenberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Holger Hartmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Andreeff
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Liane Oehme
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Leichtner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Timo Paulus
- Philips Technologie GmbH Innovative Technologies, Aachen, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,partner site Dresden, German Cancer Consortium, Dresden, Germany.,partner site Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,partner site Dresden, German Cancer Consortium, Dresden, Germany.,partner site Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rassamegevanon T, Feindt L, Koi L, Müller J, Freudenberg R, Löck S, Sihver W, Çevik E, Kühn AC, von Neubeck C, Linge A, Pietzsch HJ, Kotzerke J, Baumann M, Krause M, Dietrich A. Molecular Response to Combined Molecular- and External Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225595. [PMID: 34830750 PMCID: PMC8615625 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Our previous preclinical trial in a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) xenograft model showed a high potential for the improvement of curative treatment outcome upon the combination treatment of a radiolabeled (Yttrium-90) anti-EGFR antibody (Cetuximab) and external radiotherapy. We aim to elucidate the molecular response of HNSCC tumors upon this combination. Here, we show that the combination treatment leads to an increasing number and complexity of DNA double strand breaks. The upregulation of p21cip1/waf1 expression and cleaved caspase-3 suggest a blockage of cell cycle transition and an induction of programmed cell death. Collectively, a complex interplay between molecular mechanisms involved in cell death induction, cell cycle arrest, and DNA double strand break repair accounts for the beneficial potential using Yttrium-90-Cetuximab in combination with external radiotherapy. Abstract Combination treatment of molecular targeted and external radiotherapy is a promising strategy and was shown to improve local tumor control in a HNSCC xenograft model. To enhance the therapeutic value of this approach, this study investigated the underlying molecular response. Subcutaneous HNSCC FaDuDD xenografts were treated with single or combination therapy (X-ray: 0, 2, 4 Gy; anti-EGFR antibody (Cetuximab) (un-)labeled with Yttrium-90 (90Y)). Tumors were excised 24 h post respective treatment. Residual DNA double strand breaks (DSB), mRNA expression of DNA damage response related genes, immunoblotting, tumor histology, and immunohistological staining were analyzed. An increase in number and complexity of residual DNA DSB was observed in FaDuDD tumors exposed to the combination treatment of external irradiation and 90Y-Cetuximab relative to controls. The increase was observed in a low oxygenated area, suggesting the expansion of DNA DSB damages. Upregulation of genes encoding p21cip1/waf1 (CDKN1A) and GADD45α (GADD45A) was determined in the combination treatment group, and immunoblotting as well as immunohistochemistry confirmed the upregulation of p21cip1/waf1. The increase in residual γH2AX foci leads to the blockage of cell cycle transition and subsequently to cell death, which could be observed in the upregulation of p21cip1/waf1 expression and an elevated number of cleaved caspase-3 positive cells. Overall, a complex interplay between DNA damage repair and programmed cell death accounts for the potential benefit of the combination therapy using 90Y-Cetuximab and external radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Treewut Rassamegevanon
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (S.L.); (C.v.N.); (A.L.); (M.K.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
| | - Louis Feindt
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Lydia Koi
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Müller
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Robert Freudenberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.)
| | - Steffen Löck
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (S.L.); (C.v.N.); (A.L.); (M.K.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sihver
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany; (W.S.); (H.-J.P.)
| | - Enes Çevik
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
| | - Ariane Christel Kühn
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- B CUBE—Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (S.L.); (C.v.N.); (A.L.); (M.K.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (S.L.); (C.v.N.); (A.L.); (M.K.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Pietzsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany; (W.S.); (H.-J.P.)
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.)
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (S.L.); (C.v.N.); (A.L.); (M.K.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Antje Dietrich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (S.L.); (C.v.N.); (A.L.); (M.K.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69192 Heidelberg, Germany;
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (L.F.); (L.K.); (J.M.); (E.Ç.); (A.C.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-351-458-7404
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mao Y, Qamar M, Qamar SA, Khan MI, Bilal M, Iqbal HM. Insight of nanomedicine strategies for a targeted delivery of nanotherapeutic cues to cope with the resistant types of cancer stem cells. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
11
|
Suman SK, Subramanian S, Mukherjee A. Combination radionuclide therapy: A new paradigm. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 98-99:40-58. [PMID: 34029984 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Targeted molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) has shown its potential for the treatment of cancers of multiple origins. A combination therapy strategy employing two or more distinct therapeutic approaches in cancer management is aimed at circumventing tumor resistance by simultaneously targeting compensatory signaling pathways or bypassing survival selection mutations acquired in response to individual monotherapies. Combination radionuclide therapy (CRT) is a newer application of the concept, utilizing a combination of radiolabeled molecular targeting agents with chemotherapy and beam radiation therapy for enhanced therapeutic index. Encouraging results are reported with chemotherapeutic agents in combination with radiolabeled targeting molecules for cancer therapy. With increasing awareness of the various survival and stress response pathways activated after radionuclide therapy, different holistic combinations of MRT agents with radiosensitizers targeting such pathways have also been explored. MRT has also been studied in combination with beam radiotherapy modalities such as external beam radiation therapy and carbon ion radiation therapy to enhance the anti-tumor response. Nanotechnology aids in CRT by bringing together multiple monotherapies on a single nanostructure platform for treating cancers in a more precise or personalized way. CRT will be a key player in managing cancers if correctly tailored to the individual patient profile. The success of CRT lies in an in-depth understanding of the radiobiological principles and pathways activated in response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shishu Kant Suman
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Suresh Subramanian
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Archana Mukherjee
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dietrich A, Andreeff M, Koi L, Bergmann R, Schubert M, Schreiner L, Löck S, Sihver W, Freudenberg R, Hering S, Pietzsch HJ, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, Baumann M, Krause M. In reply to the Letter to the Editor by Chen and Lui regarding "Radiotherapy enhances uptake and efficacy of 90Y-cetuximab: A preclinical trial" by A Dietrich et al. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:261-262. [PMID: 34119587 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antje Dietrich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, TU, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Michael Andreeff
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lydia Koi
- OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, TU, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ralf Bergmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maik Schubert
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lena Schreiner
- OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, TU, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sihver
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Robert Freudenberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sandra Hering
- Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Pietzsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Steinbach
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany; Institute for Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany; Department of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, TU, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, TU, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, TU, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Damiana TST, Dalm SU. Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13050674. [PMID: 34067215 PMCID: PMC8151894 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.
Collapse
|
14
|
Radiotherapy enhances uptake and efficacy of 90Y-cetuximab: A preclinical trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 155:285-292. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
15
|
Herrmann K, Schwaiger M, Lewis JS, Solomon SB, McNeil BJ, Baumann M, Gambhir SS, Hricak H, Weissleder R. Radiotheranostics: a roadmap for future development. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e146-e156. [PMID: 32135118 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30821-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotheranostics, injectable radiopharmaceuticals with antitumour effects, have seen rapid development over the past decade. Although some formulations are already approved for human use, more radiopharmaceuticals will enter clinical practice in the next 5 years, potentially introducing new therapeutic choices for patients. Despite these advances, several challenges remain, including logistics, supply chain, regulatory issues, and education and training. By highlighting active developments in the field, this Review aims to alert practitioners to the value of radiotheranostics and to outline a roadmap for future development. Multidisciplinary approaches in clinical trial design and therapeutic administration will become essential to the continued progress of this evolving therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Herrmann
- Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jason S Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Barbara J McNeil
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Ralph Weissleder
- Department of Radiology, and Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Malcolm J, Falzone N, Lee BQ, Vallis KA. Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: New Advances for Improvement of Patient Management and Response. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E268. [PMID: 30823564 PMCID: PMC6406485 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Compared to external beam radiotherapy, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) allows for systemic radiation treatment of metastatic lesions. Published work on recent strategies to improve patient management and response to TRT through individualising patient treatment, modifying treatment pharmacokinetics and increasing anticancer potency are discussed in this review, with a special focus on the application of clinically evaluated radiolabelled ligands and peptides in the treatment of neuroendocrine and prostate cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javian Malcolm
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX37DQ, UK.
| | - Nadia Falzone
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX37DQ, UK.
| | - Boon Q Lee
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX37DQ, UK.
| | - Katherine A Vallis
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX37DQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Besemer AE, Grudzinski JJ, Weichert JP, Hall LT, Bednarz BP. Pretreatment CLR 124 Positron Emission Tomography Accurately Predicts CLR 131 Three-Dimensional Dosimetry in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2018; 34:13-23. [PMID: 30351218 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2018.2568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CLR1404 is a theranostic molecular agent that can be radiolabeled with 124I (CLR 124) for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, or 131I (CLR 131) for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy. This pilot study evaluated a pretreatment dosimetry methodology in a triple-negative breast cancer patient who was uniquely enrolled in both a CLR 124 PET imaging clinical trial and a CLR 131 therapeutic dose escalation clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three-dimensional PET/CT images were acquired at 1, 3, 24, 48, and 120 h postinjection of 178 MBq CLR 124. One month later, pretherapy 2D whole-body planar images were acquired at 0.25, 5, 24, 48, and 144 h postinjection of 370 MBq CLR 131. Following the therapeutic administration of 1990 MBq CLR 131, 3D SPECT/CT images were acquired at 74, 147, 334, and 505 h postinjection. The therapeutic CLR 131 voxel-level absorbed dose was estimated from PET (RAPID PET) and SPECT (RAPID SPECT) images using a Geant4-based Monte Carlo dosimetry platform called RAPID (Radiopharmaceutical Assessment Platform for Internal Dosimetry), and region of interest (ROI) mean doses were also estimated using the OLINDA/EXM software based on PET (OLINDA PET), SPECT (OLINDA SPECT), and planar (OLINDA planar) images. RESULTS The RAPID PET and OLINDA PET tracer-predicted ROI mean doses correlated well (m ≥ 0.631, R2 ≥ 0.694, p ≤ 0.01) with both the RAPID SPECT and OLINDA SPECT therapeutic mean doses. The 2D planar images did not have any significant correlations. The ROI mean doses differed by -4% to -43% between RAPID and OLINDA/EXM, and by -19% to 29% between PET and SPECT. The 3D dose distributions and dose volume histograms calculated with RAPID were similar for the PET/CT and SPECT/CT. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated that CLR 124 pretreatment PET images can be used to predict CLR 131 3D therapeutic dosimetry better than CLR 131 2D planar images. In addition, unlike OLINDA/EXM, Monte Carlo dosimetry methods were capable of accurately predicting dose heterogeneity, which is important for predicting dose-response relationships and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail E Besemer
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,2 Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Joseph J Grudzinski
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jamey P Weichert
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,4 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,5 Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Lance T Hall
- 4 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.,5 Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Bryan P Bednarz
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
de Araujo Farias V, O’Valle F, Serrano-Saenz S, Anderson P, Andrés E, López-Peñalver J, Tovar I, Nieto A, Santos A, Martín F, Expósito J, Oliver FJ, de Almodóvar JMR. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells enhance radiotherapy-induced cell death in tumor and metastatic tumor foci. Mol Cancer 2018; 17:122. [PMID: 30111323 PMCID: PMC6094906 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-018-0867-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have recently shown that radiotherapy may not only be a successful local and regional treatment but, when combined with MSCs, may also be a novel systemic cancer therapy. This study aimed to investigate the role of exosomes derived from irradiated MSCs in the delay of tumor growth and metastasis after treatment with MSC + radiotherapy (RT). METHODS We have measured tumor growth and metastasis formation, of subcutaneous human melanoma A375 xenografts on NOD/SCID-gamma mice, and the response of tumors to treatment with radiotherapy (2 Gy), mesenchymal cells (MSC), mesenchymal cells plus radiotherapy, and without any treatment. Using proteomic analysis, we studied the cargo of the exosomes released by the MSC treated with 2 Gy, compared with the cargo of exosomes released by MSC without treatment. RESULTS The tumor cell loss rates found after treatment with the combination of MSC and RT and for exclusive RT, were: 44.4% % and 12,1%, respectively. Concomitant and adjuvant use of RT and MSC, increased the mice surviving time 22,5% in this group, with regard to the group of mice treated with exclusive RT and in a 45,3% respect control group. Moreover, the number of metastatic foci found in the internal organs of the mice treated with MSC + RT was 60% less than the mice group treated with RT alone. We reasoned that the exosome secreted by the MSC, could be implicated in tumor growth delay and metastasis control after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that exosomes derived form MSCs, combined with radiotherapy, are determinant in the enhancement of radiation effects observed in the control of metastatic spread of melanoma cells and suggest that exosome-derived factors could be involved in the bystander, and abscopal effects found after treatment of the tumors with RT plus MSC. Radiotherapy itself may not be systemic, although it might contribute to a systemic effect when used in combination with mesenchymal stem cells owing the ability of irradiated MSCs-derived exosomes to increase the control of tumor growth and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virgínea de Araujo Farias
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, PTS Granada and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina “López Neyra”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, PTS Granada, 18016 and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Granada, Spain
| | - Francisco O’Valle
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, PTS Granada and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Santiago Serrano-Saenz
- Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina “López Neyra”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, PTS Granada, 18016 and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Granada, Spain
| | - Per Anderson
- GENYO, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research, Pfizer/Universidad de Granada/Junta de Andalucía, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Eduardo Andrés
- Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina “López Neyra”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, PTS Granada, 18016 and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Granada, Spain
| | - Jesús López-Peñalver
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, PTS Granada and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Unidad de radiología experimental, Centro de Instrumentación Científica, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Isabel Tovar
- Complejo Hospitalario de Granada, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Ana Nieto
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, PTS Granada and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Unidad de experimentación animal, Centro de Instrumentación Científica, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Ana Santos
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, PTS Granada and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Unidad de microscopia, Centro de Instrumentación Científica, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Francisco Martín
- GENYO, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research, Pfizer/Universidad de Granada/Junta de Andalucía, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - José Expósito
- Complejo Hospitalario de Granada, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - F. Javier Oliver
- Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina “López Neyra”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, PTS Granada, 18016 and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Granada, Spain
| | - José Mariano Ruiz de Almodóvar
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, PTS Granada and CIBERONC (Instituto de Salud Carlos III), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Complejo Hospitalario de Granada, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Song X, Liang C, Feng L, Yang K, Liu Z. Iodine-131-labeled, transferrin-capped polypyrrole nanoparticles for tumor-targeted synergistic photothermal-radioisotope therapy. Biomater Sci 2018; 5:1828-1835. [PMID: 28660918 DOI: 10.1039/c7bm00409e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Combining different therapeutic functions within single tumor-targeted nanoscale delivery systems is promising to overcome the limitations of conventional cancer therapies. Herein, transferrin that recognizes transferrin receptors up-regulated on tumor cells is pre-labeled with iodine-131 (131I) and then utilized as the stabilizer in the fabrication of polypyrrole (PPy) nanoparticles. The obtained transferrin-capped PPy@Tf-131I nanoparticles could be used for tumor-targeted radioisotope therapy (RIT) and photothermal therapy (PTT), by employing beta-emission from 131I and the intrinsic high near-infrared (NIR) absorbance of PPy, respectively. Owing to the transferrin-mediated tumor targeting, PPy@Tf-131I nanoparticles exhibit obviously enhanced in vitro cancer cell binding and in vivo tumor uptake compared to its non-targeting counterpart. The combined RIT and PTT based on PPy@Tf-131I nanoparticles is then conducted, achieving a remarkable synergistic therapeutic effect. This work thus demonstrates a rather simple one-step approach to fabricate tumor-targeting nanoparticles based on protein-capped conjugated polymers, promising for combination cancer therapy with great efficacy and high safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejiao Song
- Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Corroyer-Dulmont A, Falzone N, Kersemans V, Thompson J, Allen DP, Able S, Kartsonaki C, Malcolm J, Kinchesh P, Hill MA, Vojnovic B, Smart SC, Gaze MN, Vallis KA. Improved outcome of 131I-mIBG treatment through combination with external beam radiotherapy in the SK-N-SH mouse model of neuroblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:488-495. [PMID: 28595752 PMCID: PMC5636618 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of different schedules for combining external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with molecular radiotherapy (MRT) using 131I-mIBG in the management of neuroblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS BALB/c nu/nu mice bearing SK-N-SH neuroblastoma xenografts were assigned to five treatment groups: 131I-mIBG 24h after EBRT, EBRT 6days after 131I-mIBG, EBRT alone, 131I-mIBG alone and control (untreated). A total of 56 mice were assigned to 3 studies. Study 1: Vessel permeability was evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI (n=3). Study 2: Tumour uptake of 131I-mIBG in excised lesions was evaluated by γ-counting and autoradiography (n=28). Study 3: Tumour volume was assessed by longitudinal MR imaging and survival was analysed (n=25). Tumour dosimetry was performed using Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed fractions with the radiation transport code PENELOPE. RESULTS Given alone, both 131I-mIBG and EBRT resulted in a seven-day delay in tumour regrowth. Following EBRT, vessel permeability was evaluated by DCE-MRI and showed an increase at 24h post irradiation that correlated with an increase in 131I-mIBG tumour uptake, absorbed dose and overall survival in the case of combined treatment. Similarly, EBRT administered seven days after MRT to coincide with tumour regrowth, significantly decreased the tumour volume and increased overall survival. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that combining EBRT and MRT has an enhanced therapeutic effect and emphasizes the importance of treatment scheduling according to pathophysiological criteria such as tumour vessel permeability and tumour growth kinetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nadia Falzone
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Veerle Kersemans
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - James Thompson
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Danny P Allen
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Sarah Able
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | | | - Javian Malcolm
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Paul Kinchesh
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Mark A Hill
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Boris Vojnovic
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Sean C Smart
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katherine A Vallis
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Oxford University, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gill MR, Falzone N, Du Y, Vallis KA. Targeted radionuclide therapy in combined-modality regimens. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e414-e423. [PMID: 28677577 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30379-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a branch of cancer medicine concerned with the use of radioisotopes, radiolabelled molecules, nanoparticles, or microparticles that either naturally accumulate in or are designed to target tumours. TRT combines the specificity of molecular and sometimes physical targeting with the potent cytotoxicity of ionising radiation. Targeting vectors for TRT include antibodies, antibody fragments, proteins, peptides, and small molecules. The diversity of available carrier molecules, together with the large panel of suitable radioisotopes with unique physicochemical properties, allows vector-radionuclide pairings to be matched to the molecular, pathological, and physical characteristics of a tumour. Some pairings are designed for dual therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Use of TRT is increasing with the adoption into practice of radium-223 dichloride for the treatment of bone metastases and with the ongoing clinical development of, among others, 177Lu-dodecanetetraacetic acid tyrosine-3-octreotate (DOTATATE) for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours and 90Y-microspheres for the treatment of hepatic tumours. The increasing use of TRT raises the question of how best to integrate TRT into multimodality protocols. Achievements in this area and the future prospects of TRT are evaluated in this Review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R Gill
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nadia Falzone
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yong Du
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Katherine A Vallis
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krause M, Dubrovska A, Linge A, Baumann M. Cancer stem cells: Radioresistance, prediction of radiotherapy outcome and specific targets for combined treatments. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; 109:63-73. [PMID: 26877102 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 206] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Revised: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Inactivation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is of utmost importance for tumor cure after radiotherapy. An increasing body of evidence complies with a higher radioresistance of CSCs compared to the mass of tumor cells, supporting the use of CSC related biomarkers for prediction of radiotherapy outcome. Treatment individualization strategies for patient groups with vastly different risk of recurrence will most likely require application of more than one biomarker. Specifically, inclusion of established biomarkers like tumor size for primary radio(chemo)therapy or human papilloma virus (HPV) infection status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma seems to be of very high relevance. The high heterogeneity of CSC subclones along with changes of the functional behavior of individual tumors under treatment underlines the importance of the selection of the optimal timepoint(s) of biomarker evaluation, but also provides a potential therapeutic target for combined treatment approaches with irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany; OncoRay, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Corroyer-Dulmont A, Falzone N, Kersemans V, Thompson J, Hill M, Allen PD, Beech J, Gilchrist S, Kinchesh P, Vojnovic B, Tullis I, Gaze MN, Smart S, Vallis KA. MRI-guided radiotherapy of the SK-N-SH neuroblastoma xenograft model using a small animal radiation research platform. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160427. [PMID: 27524406 PMCID: PMC5605018 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Revised: 08/06/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neuroblastoma has one of the lowest survival rates of all childhood cancers, despite the use of intensive treatment regimens. Preclinical models of neuroblastoma are essential for testing new multimodality protocols, including those that involve radiotherapy (RT). The aim of this study was to develop a robust method for RT planning and tumour response monitoring based on combined MRI and cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging and to apply it to a widely studied mouse xenograft model of neuroblastoma, SK-N-SH. METHODS As part of a tumour growth inhibition study, SK-N-SH xenografts were generated in BALB/c nu/nu mice. Mice (n = 8) were placed in a printed MR- and CT-compatible plastic cradle, imaged using a 4.7-T MRI scanner and then transferred to a small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) irradiator with on-board CBCT. MRI/CBCT co-registration was performed to enable RT planning using the soft-tissue contrast afforded by MRI prior to delivery of RT (5 Gy). Tumour response was assessed by serial MRI and calliper measurements. RESULTS SK-N-SH xenografts formed soft, deformable tumours that could not be differentiated from surrounding normal tissues using CBCT. MR images, which allowed clear delineation of tumours, were successfully co-registered with CBCT images, allowing conformal RT to be delivered. MRI measurements of tumour volume 4 days after RT correlated strongly with length of survival time. CONCLUSION MRI allowed precision RT of SK-N-SH tumours and provided an accurate means of measuring tumour response. Advances in knowledge: MRI-based RT planning of murine tumours is feasible using an SARRP irradiator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nadia Falzone
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Veerle Kersemans
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Thompson
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Hill
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Danny Allen
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Beech
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stuart Gilchrist
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Kinchesh
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Boris Vojnovic
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Iain Tullis
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sean Smart
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katherine A Vallis
- CR-UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zukotynski K, Jadvar H, Capala J, Fahey F. Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Practical Applications and Future Prospects. BIOMARKERS IN CANCER 2016; 8:35-8. [PMID: 27226737 PMCID: PMC4874742 DOI: 10.4137/bic.s31804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2015] [Revised: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 10/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a proliferation in the development of targeted radionuclide cancer therapy. It is now possible to use baseline clinical and imaging assessments to determine the most effective therapy and to tailor this therapy during the course of treatment based on radiation dosimetry and tumor response. Although this personalized approach to medicine has the advantage of maximizing therapeutic effect while limiting toxicity, it can be challenging to implement and expensive. Further, in order to use targeted radionuclide therapy effectively, there is a need for multidisciplinary awareness, education, and collaboration across the scientific, industrial, and medical communities. Even more important, there is a growing understanding that combining radiopharmaceuticals with conventional treatment such as chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy may limit patient morbidity while improving survival. Developments in radiopharmaceuticals as biomarkers capable of predicting therapeutic response and targeting disease are playing a central role in medical research. Adoption of a practical approach to manufacturing and delivering radiopharmaceuticals, assessing patient eligibility, optimizing post-therapy follow-up, and addressing reimbursement issues will be essential for their success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Zukotynski
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Hossein Jadvar
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacek Capala
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Frederic Fahey
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
von Neubeck C, Seidlitz A, Kitzler HH, Beuthien-Baumann B, Krause M. Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150354. [PMID: 26159214 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults. The standard therapy for GBM is maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). In spite of the extensive treatment, the disease is associated with poor clinical outcome. Further intensification of the standard treatment is limited by the infiltrating growth of the GBM in normal brain areas, the expected neurological toxicities with radiation doses >60 Gy and the dose-limiting toxicities induced by systemic therapy. To improve the outcome of patients with GBM, alternative treatment modalities which add low or no additional toxicities to the standard treatment are needed. Many Phase II trials on new chemotherapeutics or targeted drugs have indicated potential efficacy but failed to improve the overall or progression-free survival in Phase III clinical trials. In this review, we will discuss contemporary issues related to recent technical developments and new metabolic strategies for patients with GBM including MR (spectroscopy) imaging, (amino acid) positron emission tomography (PET), amino acid PET, surgery, radiogenomics, particle therapy, radioimmunotherapy and diets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C von Neubeck
- 1 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - A Seidlitz
- 2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - H H Kitzler
- 4 Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - B Beuthien-Baumann
- 2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,6 Helmholtz-Zentrum, Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), PET Centre, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Krause
- 1 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,2 OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,7 Helmholtz-Zentrum, Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|