Visual grading evaluation of commercially available metal artefact reduction techniques in hip prosthesis computed tomography

Imaging approach to prosthetic joint infection

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging, despite multiple available laboratory tests for both serum and synovial fluid analysis. The clinical symptoms of PJI are not always characteristic, particularly in the chronic phase, and there is often significant overlap in symptoms with non-infectious forms of arthroplasty failure. Further exacerbating this challenge is lack of a universally accepted definition for PJI, with publications from multiple professional societies citing different diagnostic criteria. While not included in many of the major societies' guidelines for diagnosis of PJI, diagnostic imaging can play an important role in the workup of suspected PJI. In this article, we will review an approach to diagnostic imaging modalities (radiography, ultrasound, CT, MRI) in the workup of suspected PJI, with special attention to the limitations and benefits of each modality. We will also discuss the role that image-guided interventions play in the workup of these patients, through ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided joint aspirations. While there is no standard imaging algorithm that can universally applied to all patients with suspected PJI, we will discuss a general approach to diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention in this clinical scenario.

PET/CT and SPECT/CT for Infection in Joints and Bones: An Overview and Future Directions

Infections of the bones and joints, if misdiagnosed, may result in serious morbidity and even mortality. A prompt diagnosis followed by appropriate management may reduce the socioeconomic impact of bone and joint infections. Morphologic imaging such as ultrasound and plain radiographs form the first line investigations, however, in early infections findings may be negative or nonspecific. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques play a complementary role to morphologic imaging in the diagnosis of bone and joint infections. The availability of hybrid systems (SPECT/CT, SPECT/MRI, PET/CT or PET/MRI) offers improved specificity with ability to assess the extent of infection. Bone scans are useful as a gatekeeper wherein negative scans rule out sepsis with a good accuracy, however positive scans are nondiagnostic and more specific tracers should be considered. These include the use of labeled white blood cells and antigranulocyte antibodies. Various qualitative and quantitative interpretation criteria have been suggested to improve the specificity of the scans. PET has better image resolution and 18F-FDG is the major tracer for PET imaging with applications in oncology and inflammatory/infective disorders. It has demonstrated improved sensitivity over the SPECT based tracers, however, still suffers from lack of specificity. 18F-FDG PET has been used to monitor therapy in bone and joint infections. Other less studied, noncommercialized SPECT and PET tracers such as 111In-Biotin, 99mTc-Ubiquicidin, 18F-Na-Fluoride, 18F-labeled white blood cells and 124I-Fialuridine to name a few have shown great promise, however, their role in various bone and joint infections has not been established. Hybrid imaging with PET or PET/MRI offers huge potential for improving diagnostics in infections of the joints and bones.

Image quality and metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty CT: deep learning-based algorithm versus virtual monoenergetic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

BACKGROUND

To compare image quality, metal artifacts, and diagnostic confidence of conventional computed tomography (CT) images of unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients (THA) with deep learning-based metal artifact reduction (DL-MAR) to conventional CT and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR).

METHODS

Conventional CT and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without O-MAR and DL-MAR images of 28 unilateral THA patients were reconstructed. Image quality, metal artifacts, and diagnostic confidence in bone, pelvic organs, and soft tissue adjacent to the prosthesis were jointly scored by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between bladder and fat and muscle and fat were measured. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction were used.

RESULTS

Significantly higher image quality, higher diagnostic confidence, and less severe metal artifacts were observed on DL-MAR and images with O-MAR compared to images without O-MAR (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Higher image quality, higher diagnostic confidence for bone and soft tissue adjacent to the prosthesis, and less severe metal artifacts were observed on DL-MAR when compared to conventional images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with O-MAR (p ≤ 0.014). CNRs were higher for DL-MAR and images with O-MAR compared to images without O-MAR (p < 0.001). Higher CNRs were observed on DL-MAR images compared to conventional images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with O-MAR (p ≤ 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

DL-MAR showed higher image quality, diagnostic confidence, and superior metal artifact reduction compared to conventional CT images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without O-MAR in unilateral THA patients.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

DL-MAR resulted into improved image quality, stronger reduction of metal artifacts, and improved diagnostic confidence compared to conventional and virtual monoenergetic images with and without metal artifact reduction, bringing DL-based metal artifact reduction closer to clinical application.

KEY POINTS

• Metal artifacts introduced by total hip arthroplasty hamper radiologic assessment on CT. • A deep-learning algorithm (DL-MAR) was compared to dual-layer CT images with O-MAR. • DL-MAR showed best image quality and diagnostic confidence. • Highest contrast-to-noise ratios were observed on the DL-MAR images.

Spectral photon-counting CT: Image quality evaluation using a metal-containing bovine bone specimen

PURPOSE

To find the optimal imaging parameters for a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and to compare it to an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in terms of image quality and metal artefact severity using a metal-containing bovine knee specimen.

METHODS

A bovine knee with a stainless-steel plate and screws was imaged in a whole-body research PCD-CT at 120 kV and 140 kV and in an EID dual-source CT (DSCT) at Sn150 kV and 80/Sn150 kV. PCD-CT virtual monoenergetic 72 and 150 keV images and EID-CT images processed with and without metal artefact reduction algorithms (iMAR) were compared. Four radiologists rated the visualisation of bony structures and metal artefact severity. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni's correction were used. P-values of ≤ 0.0001 were considered statistically significant. Distributions of HU values of regions of interest (ROIs) in artefact-affected areas were analysed.

RESULTS

PCD-CT 140 kV 150 keV images received the highest scores and were significantly better than EID-CT Sn150 kV images. PCD-CT 72 keV images were rated significantly lower than all the others. HU-value variation was larger in the 120 kV and the 72 keV images. The ROI analysis revealed no large difference between scanners regarding artefact severity.

CONCLUSION

PCD-CT 140 kV 150 keV images of a metal-containing bovine knee specimen provided the best image quality. They were superior to, or as good as, the best EID-CT images; even without the presumed advantage of tin filter and metal artefact reduction algorithms. PCD-CT is a promising method for reducing metal artefacts.

Personalization of thoracoabdominal CT examinations using scanner integrated clinical decision support systems - Impact on the acquisition technique, scan range, and reconstruction type

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the impact of a scanner-integrated, customized clinical decision support system (CDSS) on the acquisition technique, scan range, and reconstruction in thoracoabdominal CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We applied CDSS in contrast-enhanced examinations of the trunk with various clinical indications on a recent scanner with the capability of dual-energy CT (DECT), anatomic landmark detection (ALD), and iterative metal-artifact reduction (MAR). Simple and comprehensive questions about the patient's breath hold capability, the anatomical region of interest, and metal implants can be answered after the localizer. The acquisition technique (single energy, SECT, or dual energy), scan range (chest-abdomen-pelvis or chest-abdomen), and reconstruction technique (with or without MAR) were then automatically adapted in the examination protocols in coherence with these selections. Retrospectively, we compared the usage rates for these techniques in 624 examinations on the study scanner with 740 examinations on a comparable scanner without CDSS. Subgroup analysis of effective dose (ED), scan duration, and image quality (IQ) was performed in the study group.

RESULTS

CDSS leads to an increased usage rate of DECT (64.4% vs. 2.8%) and MAR (75.4% vs. 44.0%). All scan range adaptations by ALD were successful. The resulting subjective IQ between single energy and DECT acquisitions was comparable (all p > 0.05). Scan duration was significantly longer in DECT than in SECT (16.9 s vs. 6.5 s; p < 0.001). However, the objective IQ was significantly higher in DECT (CNRD 2.1 vs. 1.8; p < 0.01), and the ED significantly lower (6.7 mSv vs. 7.6 mSv; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

CDSS for thoracoabdominal CT leads to a substantially increased usage rate of innovative techniques during acquisition and reconstruction. Patients with adapted protocols benefit from improved image quality and increased post-processing options at lower radiation doses.

Metal implants on abdominal CT: does split-filter dual-energy CT provide additional value over iterative metal artifact reduction?

PURPOSE

To assess image quality and metal artifact reduction in split-filter dual-energy CT (sfDECT) of the abdomen with hip or spinal implants using virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) and iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (iMAR).

METHODS

102 portal-venous abdominal sfDECTs of patients with hip (n = 71) or spinal implants (n = 31) were included in this study. Images were reconstructed as 120kVp-equivalent images (Mixed) and VMI (40-190 keV), with and without iMAR. Quantitative artifact and image noise was measured using 12 different ROIs. Subjective image quality was rated by two readers using a five-point Likert-scale in six categories, including overall image quality and vascular contrast.

RESULTS

Lowest quantitative artifact in both hip and spinal implants was measured in VMI_190keV-iMAR. However, it was not significantly lower than in Mixed_iMAR (for all ROIs, p = 1.00), which were rated best for overall image quality (hip: 1.00 [IQR: 1.00-2.00], spine: 3.00 [IQR:2.00-3.00]). VMI_50keV-iMAR was rated best for vascular contrast (hip: 1.00 [IQR: 1.00-2.00], spine: 2.00 [IQR: 1.00-2.00]), which was significantly better than Mixed (both, p < 0.001). VMI_50keV-iMAR provided superior overall image quality compared to Mixed for hip (1.00 vs 2.00, p < 0.001) and similar diagnostic image quality for spinal implants (2.00 vs 2.00, p = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

For abdominal sfDECT with hip or spinal implants Mixed_iMAR images should be used. High keV VMI do not further improve image quality. IMAR allows the use of low keV images (VMI_50keV) to improve vascular contrast, compared to Mixed images.

Reduction of metal artifacts from knee tumor prostheses on CT images: value of the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm

Background

To evaluate the effect of the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm with a multidetector CT (MDCT) for knee tumor prostheses.

Methods

First, a phantom of knee tumor prosthesis underwent a MDCT scan. The raw data was reconstructed by iterative reconstruction (IR) alone and IR plus SEMAR. The mean value of the CT number and the image noise were measured around the prosthesis at the stem level and articular level. Second, 95 consecutive patients with knee tumor prostheses underwent MDCT scans. The raw data were also reconstructed by the two methods. Periprosthetic structures were selected at the similar two levels. Four radiologists visually graded the image quality on a scale from 0 to 5. Additionally, the readers also assessed the presence of prosthetic complication and tumor recurrence on a same scale.

Results

In the phantom, when the SEMAR was used, the CT numbers were closer to normal value and the noise of images using soft and sharper kernel were respectively reduced by up to 77.1% and 43.4% at the stem level, and by up to 82.2% and 64.5% at the articular level. The subjective scores increased 1 ~ 3 points and 1 ~ 4 points at the two levels, respectively. Prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence were diagnosed in 66 patients. And the SEMAR increased the diagnostic confidence of prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence (4 ~ 5 vs. 1 ~ 1.5).

Conclusions

The SEMAR algorithm can significantly reduce the metal artifacts and increase diagnostic confidence of prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence in patients with knee tumor prostheses.

Quantitative analysis of metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty using virtual monochromatic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction, a phantom study

Objective

To quantify metal artifact reduction using 130 keV virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) with and without orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) in total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

Conventional polychromatic images and 130 keV VMI of a phantom with pellets representing bone with unilateral or bilateral prostheses were reconstructed with and without O-MAR on a dual-layer CT. Pellets were categorized as unaffected, mildly affected and severely affected.

Results

When 130 keV VMI with O-MAR was compared to conventional imaging with O-MAR, a relative metal artifact reduction in CT values, contrast-to-noise (CNR), signal-to-noise (SNR) and noise in mildly affected pellets (67%, 74%, 48%, 68%, respectively; p < 0.05) was observed but no significant relative metal artifact reduction in severely affected pellets. Comparison between 130 keV VMI without O-MAR and conventional imaging with O-MAR showed relative metal artifact reduction in CT values, CNR, SNR and noise in mildly affected pellets (92%, 72%, 38%, 51%, respectively; p < 0.05) but negative relative metal artifact reduction in CT values and noise in severely affected pellets (− 331% and -223%, respectively; p < 0.05), indicating aggravation of metal artifacts.

Conclusion

Overall, VMI of 130 keV with O-MAR provided the strongest metal artifact reduction.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-021-01111-5.

Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual-energy CT

Over the past decade, spectral or dual‐energy CT has gained relevancy, especially in oncological radiology. Nonetheless, its use in the radiotherapy (RT) clinic remains limited. This review article aims to give an overview of the current state of spectral CT and to explore opportunities for applications in RT.

In this article, three groups of benefits of spectral CT over conventional CT in RT are recognized. Firstly, spectral CT provides more information of physical properties of the body, which can improve dose calculation. Furthermore, it improves the visibility of tumors, for a wide variety of malignancies as well as organs‐at‐risk OARs, which could reduce treatment uncertainty. And finally, spectral CT provides quantitative physiological information, which can be used to personalize and quantify treatment.

Metal Artifact Reduction in Head CT Performed for Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: Effectiveness of a Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Deep brain stimulation electrodes induce massive artifacts on CT images, deteriorating the diagnostic value of examinations. We aimed to investigate the usefulness and potential limitations of a single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in head CT performed in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with deep brain stimulation (bilateral, n = 28) who underwent head CT on a 320-detector row scanner and whose images were reconstructed with and without single-energy metal artifact reduction at the examinations were retrospectively included. The severity of artifacts around electrodes was assessed objectively using SDs and an artifact index. Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the severity of artifacts from electrodes, the visibility of electrode localization and surrounding structures, and overall diagnostic confidence on 4-point scales. Background image quality (GM-WM contrast and image noise) was subjectively and objectively assessed. The presence and location of artifacts newly produced by single-energy metal artifact reduction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Single-energy metal artifact reduction provided lower objective and subjective metal artifacts and improved visualization of electrode localization and surrounding structures and diagnostic confidence compared with non-single-energy metal artifact reduction images, with statistical significance (all, P < .01). No significant differences were observed in GM-WM contrast and image noise (all, P ≥ .11). The new artifacts from single-energy metal artifact reduction were prominently observed in patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation at high convexity, possibly induced by deep brain stimulation leads placed under the parietal scalp.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-energy metal artifact reduction substantially reduces the metal artifacts from deep brain stimulation electrodes and improves the visibility of intracranial structures without affecting background image quality. However, non-single-energy metal artifact reduction images should be simultaneously reviewed to accurately assess the entire intracranial area, particularly in patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation.

Comparison of quantitative measurements of four manufacturer's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging with a self-made acrylic phantom

BACKGROUND

Metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques can improve metal artifacts of computed tomography (CT) images.

OBJECTIVE

This work focused on conducting a quantitative analysis to compare the effectiveness of four commercial MAR techniques on three types of metal implants (hip implant, spinal implant, and dental filling) with a self-made acrylic phantom.

METHODS

A cylindrical phantom was made from acrylic with a groove in the middle, and then three types of metal implants were placed in the groove. The phantom was scanned by four CT scanners and four commercialized MAR techniques were used to analyze the images. The techniques used were single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR, Canon), smart metal artifact reduction software (Smart-MAR, GE), iterative metal artifact reduction (IMAR, Siemens), and metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (OMAR, Philips). Quantitative analysis methods included objective and subjective analysis.

RESULTS

The expected value of SEMAR, Smart-MAR, IMAR, and OMAR were 36.6, 37.8, 5.0, and 2.3, respectively. SEMAR and Smart-MAR achieved optimal results.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully evaluated the effects of four commercial MAR techniques on three types of metal implants in a phantom. All MAR techniques effectively reduced metal artifacts, but the effect was not significant with dental fillings due to high-density material.

Quantitative assessment of three vendor's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging using a customized phantom

A metal implant was placed in an acrylic phantom to enable quantitative analysis of the metal artifact reduction techniques used in computed tomography (CT) scanners from three manufacturers. Two titanium rods were placed in a groove in a cylindrical phantom made by acrylic, after which the groove was filled with water. The phantom was scanned using three CT scanners (Toshiba, GE, Siemens) under the abdomen CT setting. CT number accuracy, contrast-to-noise ratio, area of the metal rods in the images, and fraction of affected pixel area of water were measured using ImageJ. Different iterative reconstruction, dual energy, and metal artifact reduction techniques were compared within three vendors. The highest contrast-to-noise ratio of three scanners were 85.7 ± 8.4 (Toshiba), 85.9 ± 11.7 (GE), and 55.0 ± 14.8 (Siemens); and the most correct results of metal area were 157.1 ± 1.4 mm² (Toshiba), 155.0 ± 1.0 (GE), and 170.6 ± 5.3 (Siemens). The fraction of affected pixel area obtained using single-energy metal artifact reduction of Toshiba scanner was 2.2% ± 0.7%, which is more favorable than 4.1% ± 0.7% obtained using metal artifact reduction software of GE scanner (p = 0.002). Among all quantitative results, the estimations with fraction of affected pixel areas matched the effect of metal artifact reduction in the actual images. Therefore, the single-energy metal artifact reduction technique of Toshiba scanner had a desirable effect. The metal artifact reduction software of GE scanner effectively reduced the effect of metal artifacts; however, it underestimated the size of the metal rods. The monoenergetic and dual energy composition techniques of Siemens scanner could not effectively reduce metal artifacts.

New diagnostic tools for prosthetic joint infection

The diagnosis of peri-prosthetic bone and joint infections relies on converging information from clinical, laboratory and imaging assessments. Clinical findings alone may suffice: a sinus tract is a major criterion that establishes the diagnosis of infection. Identifying the causative organism is crucial and requires the early collection of high-quality samples from sites in contact with the prosthetic material. The bacteriological samples may be obtained by aspiration or open surgery. Imaging techniques have undergone remarkable improvements over the last two decades. Ultrasonography can be performed early and can be used to guide a needle biopsy if appropriate. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging shows the extent of bone and/or soft-tissue involvement, provided effective artefact-suppression techniques are applied. Nuclear medicine methods have an undefined place in the diagnostic strategy and their possible role must be evaluated during a multidisciplinary discussion. The array of new laboratory methods introduced in recent years includes microbiological culture techniques, molecular biology tests, antigen and antibody assays and tests for immune markers in blood and/or joint fluid. When the first-line investigations fail to provide a definitive diagnosis, a multidisciplinary discussion at a referral centre for complex osteo-articular infections makes a major contribution to defining the subsequent diagnostic strategy. This lecture focusses on the following six questions: does the clinical assessment still have diagnostic relevance? What is the diagnostic contribution of imaging studies? Must the infection be documented pre-operatively and if so, how? Which microbiological techniques should be used? Which non-microbiological investigations help to diagnosis peri-prosthetic bone and joint infections? What role do referral centres for complex bone and joint infections play in the diagnostic strategy?

Combined application of virtual monoenergetic high keV images and the orthopedic metal artifact reduction algorithm (O-MAR): effect on image quality

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is any additional metal artifact reduction when virtual monochromatic images (VMI) and metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) are applied together compared to their separate application in both phantom and clinical abdominopelvic CT studies.

METHODS

An agar phantom containing a spinal prosthesis was scanned using a dual-layer, energy CT scanner (IQon, Philips Healthcare), and reconstructed with the filtered back-projection algorithm without O-MAR (FBP), filtered back-projection algorithm with O-MAR (O-MAR), VMI₁₄₀ without O-MAR (VMI₁₄₀), and VMI₁₄₀ with O-MAR (VMI₁₄₀ + O-MAR). Abdominopelvic CT images of 47 patients with metallic prostheses were also reconstructed in the same manner for clinical study. Noise measured as the standard deviation of CT Hounsfield units was compared between the four reconstruction methods in both phantom and clinical studies. Improvements in metal artifact reduction, image quality, and diagnostic improvement were further analyzed in the clinical study.

RESULTS

Noise was significantly decreased when both VMI and O-MAR were applied in conjunction compared to their separate application in both phantom (16.3 HU vs. 25.0 and 26.4 HU) and clinical studies (15.8 HU vs. 19.2 and 26.2 HU). In the clinical study, the qualitative degree of artifacts was also significantly reduced with VMI₁₄₀ + O-MAR (2.85 and 2.87) compared to VMI₁₄₀ (2.36 and 2.26) or O-MAR (2.13 and 2.04) alone for both reviewers (P < 0.001) and improvements in image quality were observed in all 47 patients, with actual diagnostic improvements observed in three.

CONCLUSIONS

Metal artifacts can be additionally reduced by applying O-MAR and VMI in conjunction, compared to their separate application, thereby improving diagnostic performance.

Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants

Background Metal implants may introduce severe artifacts in computed tomography (CT) images. Over the last few years dedicated algorithms have been developed in order to reduce metal artifacts in CT images. Purpose To investigate and compare metal artifact reduction algorithms (MARs) from four different CT vendors when imaging three different orthopedic metal implants. Material and Methods Three clinical metal implants were attached to the leg of an anthropomorphic phantom: cobalt-chrome; stainless steel; and titanium. Four commercial MARs were investigated: SmartMAR (GE); O-MAR (Philips); iMAR (Siemens); and SEMAR (Toshiba). The images were evaluated subjectively by three observers and analyzed objectively by calculating the fraction of pixels with CT number above 500 HU in a region of interest around the metal. The average CT number and image noise were also measured. Results Both subjective evaluation and objective analysis showed that MARs reduced metal artifacts and improved the image quality for CT images containing metal implants of steel and cobalt-chrome. When using MARs on titanium, all MARs introduced new visible artifacts. Conclusion The effect of MARs varied between CT vendors and different metal implants used in orthopedic surgery. Both in subjective evaluation and objective analysis the effect of applying MARs was most obvious on steel and cobalt-chrome implants when using SEMAR from Toshiba followed by SmartMAR from GE. However, MARs may also introduce new image artifacts especially when used on titanium implants. Therefore, it is important to reconstruct all CT images containing metal with and without MARs.

Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists

Artifacts caused by metallic implants appear as dark and bright streaks at computed tomography (CT), which severely degrade the image quality and decrease the diagnostic value of the examination. When x-rays pass through a metal object, depending on its size and composition, different physical effects negatively affect the measurements in the detector, most notably the effects of photon starvation and beam hardening. To improve image quality and recover information about underlying structures, several artifact reduction methods have been introduced in modern CT systems. Projection-based metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms act in projection space and replace corrupted projections caused by metal with interpolation from neighboring uncorrupted projections. MAR algorithms primarily suppress artifacts that are due to photon starvation. The dual-energy CT technique is characterized by data acquisition at two different energy spectra. Dual-energy CT provides synthesized virtual monochromatic images at different photon energy (kiloelectron volt) levels, and virtual monochromatic images obtained at high kiloelectron volt levels are known to reduce the effects of beam hardening. In clinical practice, although MAR algorithms can be applied after image acquisition, the decision whether to apply dual-energy CT for the patient usually needs to be made before image acquisition. Radiologists should be more familiar with the clinical and technical features of each method and should be able to choose the optimal method according to the clinical situation. ^©RSNA, 2018.

Single-energy metal artifact reduction technique for reducing metallic coil artifacts on post-interventional cerebral CT and CT angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of the single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm on image quality of cerebral CT and CT angiography (CTA) for patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm coiling.

METHODS

Twenty patients underwent cerebral CT and CTA using a 320-detector row CT after intracranial aneurysm coiling. Images with and without application of the SEMAR algorithm (SEMAR CT and standard CT images, respectively) were reconstructed for each patient. The images were qualitatively assessed by two independent radiologists in a blinded manner for the depiction of anatomical structures around the coil, delineation of the arteries around the coil, and the depiction of the status of coiled aneurysms. Artifact strength was quantitatively assessed by measuring the standard deviation of attenuation values around the coil.

RESULTS

The strength of artifacts measured in SEMAR CT images was significantly lower than that in standard CT images (25.7 ± 10.2 H.U. vs. 80.4 ± 67.2 H.U., p < 0.01, Student's paired t test). SEMAR CT images were significantly improved compared with standard CT images in the depiction of anatomical structures around the coil (p < 0.01, the sign test), delineation of the arteries around the coil (p < 0.01), and the depiction of the status of coiled aneurysms (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The SEMAR algorithm significantly reduces metal artifacts from intracranial aneurysm coiling and improves visualization of anatomical structures and arteries around the coil, and depiction of the status of coiled aneurysms on post-interventional cerebral CT.