Colon cancer screening with CT colonography: logistics, cost-effectiveness, efficiency and progress

Colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Although the association between appendicitis and colorectal cancer in older patients has received attention, postoperative colorectal screening through endoscopy is not currently recommended. This study conducted a systematic review of the literature on colorectal screening following appendectomy in adult patients.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using online databases. Studies reporting colorectal surveillance after appendectomy in adult patients were retrieved for assessment.

RESULTS

Eight articles including a total of 3,995 patients were published between 2013 and 2023. An age of 40 years was the lower threshold in 6 of the 8 articles. Postoperative colorectal screening occurred in 771 patients (19.3%). Endoscopy was performed in 95.2% of cases and computed tomography-colonography in 4.8%. During endoscopic examinations, a lesion was discovered in 184 of 771 patients (24.0%), and an adenomatous polyp was found in 154 of 686 patients (22.5%). The overall cancer rate was 3.9% (30 of 771 patients). The tumor was located in the right-sided colon in 46.7% of the patients, in the cecum in 20.0%, in the rectum in 16.7%, in the left-sided colon in 10.0%, and in the sigmoid colon in 6.7%.

CONCLUSION

Performing post-appendectomy colorectal screening in patients >40 years of age could allow early detection of an underlying lesion.

Precision Metrics: A Narrative Review on Unlocking the Power of KPIs in Radiology for Enhanced Precision Medicine

(Background) Over the years, there has been increasing interest in adopting a quality approach in radiology, leading to the strategic pursuit of specific and key performance indicators (KPIs). These indicators in radiology can have significant impacts ranging from radiation protection to integration into digital healthcare. (Purpose) This study aimed to conduct a narrative review on the integration of key performance indicators (KPIs) in radiology with specific key questions. (Methods) This review utilized a standardized checklist for narrative reviews, including the ANDJ Narrative Checklist, to ensure thoroughness and consistency. Searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using a combination of keywords related to radiology and KPIs, with Boolean logic to refine results. From an initial yield of 211 studies, 127 were excluded due to a lack of focus on KPIs. The remaining 84 studies were assessed for clarity, design, and methodology, with 26 ultimately selected for detailed review. The evaluation process involved multiple assessors to minimize bias and ensure a rigorous analysis. (Results and Discussion) This overview highlights the following: KPIs are crucial for advancing radiology by supporting the evolution of imaging technologies (e.g., CT, MRI) and integrating emerging technologies like AI and AR/VR. They ensure high standards in diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and operational efficiency, enhancing diagnostic capabilities and streamlining workflows. KPIs are vital for radiological safety, measuring adherence to protocols that minimize radiation exposure and protect patients. The effective integration of KPIs into healthcare systems requires systematic development, validation, and standardization, supported by national and international initiatives. Addressing challenges like CAD-CAM technology and home-based radiology is essential. Developing specialized KPIs for new technologies will be key to continuous improvement in patient care and radiological practices. (Conclusions) In conclusion, KPIs are essential for advancing radiology, while future research should focus on improving data access and developing specialized KPIs to address emerging challenges. Future research should focus on expanding documentation sources, improving web search methods, and establishing direct connections with scientific associations.

Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of CT as Compared to MRI in Detecting Metastases in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a hospital in Najran, Saudi Arabia. A total of 51 patients with CRC were included in the study. The radiological findings of metastatic lesions and the diagnostic accuracy measures of CT compared to MRI were analyzed. The results showed that CT had a false negative rate of 7.8%, a false positive rate of 7.8%, a true negative rate of 27.5%, and a true positive rate of 56.9% in detecting metastases. Diagnostic accuracy measures varied based on the number of metastatic lesions, with higher sensitivity observed for cases with fewer lesions. Gender, timing of imaging in relation to surgical intervention, and administration of nonsurgical therapy showed significant associations with diagnosis mismatch between CT and MRI. The site of metastases and the site of the primary tumor in the colon also demonstrated significant associations with diagnosis mismatch. The size of the largest metastasis detected by MRI was significantly associated with diagnosis mismatch. The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting any metastases, compared to MRI as the reference standard, was estimated to have a sensitivity of 87.8%, a specificity of 77.8%, a positive predictive value of 87.8%, and a negative predictive value of 77.8%. This study provides valuable insights into the comparative diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in detecting metastases of CRC, highlighting the importance of considering patient characteristics, disease outcome, and tumor characteristics in the interpretation of imaging results.

Construction and verification of a histone deacetylases-related prognostic signature model for colon cancer

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) contribute significantly to the initiation, progression, and prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (COAD). Additionally, HDACs regulate the tumor microenvironment, immune escape, and tumor stem cells, and are closely linked to COAD prognosis. We developed a prognostic model for COAD that incorporates HDACs to evaluate their specific roles. The COAD dataset containing clinical and mutation data was collected using the TCGA and GEO databases to obtain genes associated with HDAC. LASSO analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine the presence of prognostic genes. Multivariate Cox analysis was also used to determine risk scores for HDAC-related features. Furthermore, genomic alterations, immune infiltration, and drug response were compared between high- and low-risk groups. Cellular experiments validated the potential regulatory role of BRD3 on COAD proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. The median risk scores, calculated based on the characteristics, demonstrated a more significant prognostic improvement in patients in the low-risk group. Furthermore, HDAC-related features were identified as important independent prognostic factors for patients with COAD. Additionally, genomic mutation status, immune infiltration, and function, as well as response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, were found to be associated with risk scores. Subgroup analyses indicate that anti-PD-1 therapy may be beneficial for patients in the low-risk group. Additionally, a decrease in risk score was associated with a decrease in immune infiltration. Finally, HCT116 and HT29 cells exhibited inhibition of BRD3 gene proliferation and migration, as well as promotion of apoptosis. In patients with COAD, HDAC-related characteristics may be useful in predicting survival and selecting treatment.

Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, being the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Despite the progress in screening, early diagnosis, and treatment, approximately 20%-25% of CRC patients still present with metastatic disease at the time of their initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the burden of disease is still expected to increase, especially in individuals younger than 50 years old, among whom early-onset CRC incidence has been increasing. Screening and early detection are pivotal to improve CRC-related outcomes. It is well established that CRC screening not only reduces incidence, but also decreases deaths from CRC. Diverse screening strategies have proven effective in decreasing both CRC incidence and mortality, though variations in efficacy have been reported across the literature. However, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal screening method, age intervals and periodicity. Moreover, adherence to CRC screening remains globally low. In recent years, emerging technologies, notably artificial intelligence, and non-invasive biomarkers, have been developed to overcome these barriers. However, controversy exists over the actual impact of some of the new discoveries on CRC-related outcomes and how to effectively integrate them into daily practice. In this review, we aim to cover the current evidence surrounding CRC screening. We will further critically assess novel approaches under investigation, in an effort to differentiate promising innovations from mere novelties.

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Literacy and Facilitators Related to a Free Screening Program in Thailand

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate CRC screening literacy and to determine the association between demographic characteristics and levels of CRC screening literacy and facilitators motivating participation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out with 1,272 Thai citizens aged 50-70 years consenting to complete the screening protocol. Data were collected at the final visit by a self-reported questionnaire which was developed and validated using I-CVI=1. Difficulty of CRC screening knowledge dimension was tested by KR20, Cronbach's alpha 0.49.

RESULTS

The majority of participants, 834 (65.6%) had sufficient CRC screening literacy and association between characteristics and levels of CRC screening literacy was not different. Comparing between characteristics and facilitators showed significant differences in trusting healthcare providers, perceiving harmless procedures, having constipation and time available. By married and own income participants exhibited lower trust in healthcare providers, 68% (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.14 - 0.73) and 59% (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.19 - 0.95), respectively. Married individuals perceived the procedures of screening involved higher harm, 32% (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.45 - 0.99). Female and age over 60 with constipation constituted higher screening, 1.9 fold (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.44 - 2.60) and 1.4 fold (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.09 - 1.90). Though time available, age over 60 was lower screening 56% (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.24 - 0.80), while own income and income more than 30,000 THB/month participants constituted higher screening 15 fold (OR 15.14, 95%CI 4.72 - 48.56) and 2.5 fold (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.50 - 4.18), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CRC screening literacy of participants was high. The association between characteristics and CRC screening literacy levels did not differ while characteristics and facilitators differed in some aspects. The free program promoted CRC screening equity; however, multilevel facilitators must be concerned, prioritized and intervened to motivate participation.

Progress and Perspectives in Colon Cancer Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatments

Worldwide, colon cancer is the third most frequent malignancy and the second most common cause of death. Although it can strike anybody at any age, colon cancer mostly affects the elderly. Small, non-cancerous cell clusters inside the colon, commonly known as polyps, are typically where colon cancer growth starts. But over time, if left untreated, these benign polyps may develop into malignant tissues and develop into colon cancer. For the diagnosis of colon cancer, with routine inspection of the colon region for polyps, several techniques, including colonoscopy and cancer scanning, are used. In the case identifying the polyps in the colon area, efforts are being taken to surgically remove the polyps as quickly as possible before they become malignant. If the polyps become malignant, then colon cancer treatment strategies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, are applied to the patients. Despite the recent improvements in diagnosis and prognosis, the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a challenging task. The objective of this review was to discuss how CRC is initiated, and its various developmental stages, pathophysiology, and risk factors, and also to explore the current state of colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment, as well as recent advancements in the field, such as new screening methods and targeted therapies. We examined the limitations of current methods and discussed the ongoing need for research and development in this area. While this topic may be serious and complex, we hope to engage and inform our audience on this important issue.

High Concordance of CT Colonography and Colonoscopy Allows for the Distinguishing and Diagnosing of Intestinal Diseases

(1) Although new imaging methods for examining the GIT with high diagnostic capabilities were introduced, the improvement and implementation of safe, efficient, and cost-effective approaches continue, and GIT diseases are still challenging to diagnose; (2) Methods: We aim to show the possibilities of computed tomography (CT) colonography for early diagnosis of colon diseases using a multidetector 32-channel CT scanner after appropriate preparation; (3) Results: After a colonoscopy was performed earlier, 140 patients were examined with CT colonography. Complete colonoscopy was performed in 80 patients (57.1%) out of 140 who underwent CT colonography. Incomplete colonoscopy was observed in 52 patients (37.2%); in 5 patients (3.6%), it was contraindicated, and in 3 patients (2.1%), it was not performed because of patients' refusal. We determined that in cases of complete FCS in 95% of patients, CT colonography established the same clinical diagnosis as FCS. In cases of incomplete, refused, or contraindicated FCS in 32.7% (17 patients), FCS failed to diagnose correctly. The main reasons for incomplete colonoscopy were: intraluminal obturation of tumor nature-17 patients (33%), extraluminal obturation (compression) from a tumor formation-4 patients (8%), stenotic changes of non-tumor nature-11 patients (21%), congenital diseases with changes in the length of the lumen of the intestinal loops-7 patients (13%), and subjective factors (pain, poor preparation, contraindications) in 13 patients (25%); (4) Conclusions: Our results confirmed that CT colonography is a method of choice in cases of negative FCS results accompanied by clinical data for the neoplastic process and in cases of incomplete and contraindicated FCS. Also, the insufflation system we developed optimizes the method by improving the quality of the obtained images and ensuring good patient tolerance.

Performance of different colorectal cancer screening strategies: a long-term passive follow-up population-based screening program in Beijing, China

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the performance of the risk assessment questionnaire and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program to provide timely evidence for tailored screening strategies in China.

METHODS

This analysis was conducted using data from Beijing Cancer Screening Prospective Cohort Study (BCSPCS). A risk assessment questionnaire and FIT were selected as the primary screening methods, and participants with any positive results were referred to undergo a diagnostic colonoscopy.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2020, 148,636 Beijing residents aged 40-69 years were invited from designated communities, with 147,807 finishing the risk assessment questionnaire and 115,606 (78.2%) completing the FIT. Among the 42,969 (29.1%) high-risk CRC participants, 23,824 (55.4%) underwent colonoscopy. One year after enrollment, all subjects were linked to the Beijing Cancer Registry (BCR) database and 241 cases of CRC were confirmed. The CRC incidence rate was 58.2/100,000 for the low-risk arm and 418.9/100,000 for the high-risk arm. For participants who underwent colonoscopy, 91 CRC cases were detected, with a detection rate of 91.9% and 63.7% of them were early-stage cases. Furthermore, the sensitivities of utilizing the risk assessment questionnaire alone, FIT alone, combined risk assessment questionnaire and FIT were 75.7%, 50.1%, and 95.1%, and the specificities were 75.3%, 87.3%, and 70.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Beijing CRC screening program can effectively detect early-onset CRC; however, the compliance with colonoscopy still needs to be improved.

Increasing the accuracy of colorectal cancer screening

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health issue, being responsible for nearly 10% of all cancer-related deaths. Since CRC is often an asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic disease until it reaches advanced stages, screening is crucial for the diagnosis of preneoplastic lesions or early CRC.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to summarize the literature evidence on currently available CRC screening tools, with their pros and cons, focusing on the level of accuracy reached by each test over time. We also provide an overview of novel technologies and scientific advances that are currently being investigated and that in the future may represent real game-changers in the field of CRC screening.

EXPERT OPINION

We suggest that best screening modalities are annual or biennial FIT and colonoscopy every 10 years. We believe that the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI)-tools in the CRC screening field could lead to a significant improvement of the screening efficacy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality in the future. More resources should be put into implementing CRC programmes and support research project to further increase accuracy of CRC screening tests and strategies.

Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients

The aim of this review is to investigate the literature pertaining to the potential risks of low-dose ionizing radiation to Lynch syndrome patients by use of computed tomography (CT), either diagnostic CT colonography (CTC), standard staging CT or CT surveillance. Furthermore, this review explores the potential risks of using radiotherapy for treatment of rectal cancer in these patients. No data or longitudinal observational studies of the impact of radiation exposure on humans with Lynch syndrome were identified. Limited experimental studies utilizing cell lines and primary cells exposed to both low and high radiation doses have been carried out to help determine radio-sensitivity associated with DNA mismatch repair gene deficiency, the defining feature of Lynch syndrome. On balance, these studies suggest that mismatch repair deficient cells may be relatively radio-resistant (particularly for low dose rate exposures) with higher mutation rates, albeit no firm conclusions can be drawn. Mouse model studies, though, showed an increased risk of developing colorectal tumors in mismatch repair deficient mice exposed to radiation doses around 2 Gy. With appropriate ethical approval, further studies investigating radiation risks associated with CT imaging and radiotherapy relevant doses using cells/tissues derived from confirmed Lynch patients or genetically modified animal models are urgently required for future clinical guidance.

Colorectal Carcinoma, Cyclooxygenases, and COX Inhibitors

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the most common of gastrointestinal cancers, the majority presenting with sporadic occurrence compared to the less frequently inherited syndromes. The increasing incidence, decreasing gender and age disparities, and the prevalent risk factors are concerning. The malignancy arising from benign precursor polyps transforms slowly over time. The adenoma variant polyps reported a marked upregulation of cyclooxygenases (COX), significantly COX-2 isoform, influenced by various determinants such as genetics, pathology, histology, and site of the carcinoma. These COX enzymes are responsible for prostaglandin synthesis and the consequent cascade of cell inflammation and proliferation. Therefore, COX inhibition by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) targeted against both the isoforms COX-1 and COX-2 have been studied for decades in anticipation of preventing the occurrence of colorectal carcinoma in high-risk populations. This article has collated and highlighted the overexpression of COX enzymes by the adenomatous polyps and provides corroborating evidence from multiple studies in favor of COX inhibition by NSAIDs. Aspirin and Sulindac were two drugs to be initially proven to halt the progression and cause regression of the polyps. Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor besides NSAIDs, was also used in experimental studies.

Lactate Metabolism-Associated lncRNA Pairs: A Prognostic Signature to Reveal the Immunological Landscape and Mediate Therapeutic Response in Patients With Colon Adenocarcinoma

Background

Lactate metabolism is critically involved in the tumor microenvironment (TME), as well as cancer progression. It is important to note, however, that lactate metabolism-related long non-coding RNAs (laRlncRNAs) remain incredibly understudied in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).

Methods

A gene expression profile was obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to identify laRlncRNA expression in COAD patients. A risk signature with prognostic value was identified from TCGA and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohort based on laRlncRNA pairs by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression analyses. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and functional experiments were carried out to verify the expression of laRlncRNAs in COAD. The relationship of laRlncRNA pairs with immune landscape as well as the sensitivity of different therapies was explored.

Results

In total, 2378 laRlncRNAs were identified, 1,120 pairs of which were studied to determine their prognostic validity, followed by a risk signature established based on the screened 5 laRlncRNA pairs. The laRlncRNA pairs-based signature provided a better overall survival (OS) prediction than other published signatures and functioned as a prognostic marker for COAD patients. According to the calculated optimal cut-off point, patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups. The OS of COAD patients in the high-risk group were significantly shorter than that of those in the low-risk group (P=4.252e-14 in the TCGA cohort and P=2.865-02 in the GEO cohort). Furthermore, it remained an effective predictor of survival in strata of gender, age, TNM stage, and its significance persisted after univariate and multivariate Cox regressions. Additionally, the risk signature was significantly correlated with immune cells infiltration, tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) as well as immunotherapeutic efficacy and chemotherapy sensitivity. Finally, one of the laRlncRNA, LINC01315, promotes proliferation and migration capacities of colon cancer cells.

Conclusion

The newly identified laRlncRNAs pairs-based signature exhibits potential effects in predicting prognosis, deciphering patients’ immune landscape, and mediating sensitivity to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Findings in our study may provide evidence for the role of laRlncRNAs pairs as novel prognostic biomarkers and potentially individualized therapy targets for COAD patients.

Integrative Proteo-Genomic Analysis for Recurrent Survival Prognosis in Colon Adenocarcinoma

Background

The survival prognosis is the hallmark of cancer progression. Here, we aimed to develop a recurrence-related gene signature to predict the prognosis of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).

Methods

The proteomic data from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) and genomic data from the cancer genomic maps [The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)] dataset were analyzed to identify co-differentially expressed genes (cDEGs) between recurrence samples and non-recurrence samples in COAD using limma package. Functional enrichment analysis, including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway was conducted. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were applied to identify the independent prognostic feature cDEGs and establish the signature whose performance was evaluated by Kaplan–Meier curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), and calibration curve. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC) and a nomogram were calculated to assess the predictive accuracy. GSE17538 and GSE39582 were used for external validation. Quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis were carried out to validate our findings.

Results

We identified 86 cDEGs in recurrence samples compared with non-recurrence samples. These genes were primarily enriched in the regulation of carbon metabolic process, fructose and mannose metabolism, and extracellular exosome. Then, an eight-gene-based signature (CA12, HBB, NCF1, KBTBD11, MMAA, DMBT1, AHNAK2, and FBLN2) was developed to separate patients into high- and low-risk groups. Patients in the low-risk group had significantly better prognosis than those in the high-risk group. Four prognostic clinical features, including pathological M, N, T, and RS model status, were screened for building the nomogram survival model. The PCR and Western blot analysis results suggested that CA12 and AHNAK2 were significantly upregulated, while MMAA and DMBT1 were downregulated in the tumor sample compared with adjacent tissues, and in non-recurrent samples compared with non-recurrent samples in COAD.

Conclusion

These identified recurrence-related gene signatures might provide an effective prognostic predictor and promising therapeutic targets for COAD patients.

Assessment of the Use of Preoperative CT Scan Image for Predicting Lymph Nodes for Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer that accounts for nearly 10% of the cancers, with 1.36 million people worldwide. Nodal status (N-stage) evaluation was inferior between observers, which considered CT scanning a good N-stage. We hypothesized that CRC patients’ preoperative CT scan imaging predicts the nodal and metastatic stage. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This noninterventional retrospective study was carried out using patients’ medical records, including medical history and results of diagnostic tests, and preoperative clinical and pathological stages. All direct identifiers have been removed from all patient data. This study included 96 patients who underwent resection curative surgery for CRC at the Tertiary Hospital, Sudan, between March 2009 and December 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median age was 69 years (47–74 years), and 49 (51.04%) were female. The tumor stage of the patients was 4, 11, 74, and 7 as T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. A total of 38 patients with a malignant spread in lymph nodes were observed, and the median lymph node count was 11 (range 4–52). Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy calculated for the malignant lymph nodes were 75.56% (95% CI: 60.46–87.12%), 45.10% (95% CI: 31.13–59.66%), 1.38 (95% CI: 1.02–1.86), 0.54 (95% CI: 0.30–0.98), 54.84% (95% CI: 47.38–62.09%), 67.65% (95% CI: 53.53–79.15%), and 59.38% (95% CI: 48.87–69.29%), respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The preoperative CT scan images were used to predict lymph nodes with a diagnostic accuracy of 59.38% for N-stage in patients with CRC.

Diagnosis of Nonperitonealized Colorectal Cancer with Computerized Tomography Image Features under Deep Learning

This study aimed to explore the value of abdominal computerized tomography (CT) three-dimensional reconstruction using the dense residual single-axis super-resolution algorithm in the diagnosis of nonperitonealized colorectal cancer (CC). 103 patients with nonperitonealized CC (the lesion was located in the ascending colon or descending colon) were taken as the research subjects. The imagological tumor (T) staging, the extramural depth (EMD) of the cancer tissues, and the extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) grading were analyzed. A dense residual single-axis super-resolution network model was also constructed for enhancing CT images. It was found that the CT images processed using the algorithm were clear, and the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) were 33.828 dB and 0.856, respectively. In the imagological T staging of CC patients, there were 17 cases in the T3 stage and 68 cases in the T4 stage. With the EMD increasing, the preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) highly increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stays of patients were also different with different grades of EMVI. The hospital stay of grade 1 patients (19.45 days) was much longer than that of grade 2 patients (13.19 days), grade 3 patients (15.36 days), and grade 4 patients (14.36 days); the differences were of statistical significance (P < 0.05). It was suggested that CT images under the deep learning algorithm had a high clinical value in the evaluation of T staging, EMD, and EMVI for the diagnosis of CC.

Value of multi-slice spiral computerized tomography for diagnosis of synchronous colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective study

Objective

To compare the accuracy of multi-slice spiral computerized tomography (MSCT) with colonoscopy for diagnosing synchronous colorectal carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients admitted to our institution with colorectal carcinoma between 19 September 2014 and 31 January 2020. Data on SCC patients who had undergone MSCT and colonoscopy were analyzed. Information on tumor location, tumor size, missed diagnosis by MSCT or colonoscopy, T stage, pathological type, and reasons for missed diagnosis was recorded and used to assess the diagnostic accuracies of MSCT and colonoscopy.

Results

Twenty-three cases met the inclusion criteria. MSCT plus colonoscopy had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (93.5%) than colonoscopy alone. There were significant differences in missed diagnosis rates of proximal cancer (34.8%) and distal cancer (4.3%) by colonoscopy. For MSCT, the missed diagnosis rate for tumors with a median long diameter of 1.25 cm (interquartile range 0.80, 1.50) was significantly lower than that for larger tumors (long diameter 4.00 cm; 3.00, 6.00).

Conclusions

MSCT is a valuable diagnostic tool for SCC that can effectively minimize the missed diagnosis rate of primary tumors when combined with colonoscopy.

Explaining the adoption and use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance image technologies in public hospitals

Objective

This article examines what the adoption and use of advanced medical technologies – computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – by public hospitals depend on and to what extent.

Methods

From a sample of panel data for all public hospitals in the health service of Galicia (a subregion of the Galicia-North of Portugal Euroregion) for the 2010–2017 period, we grouped explanatory variables into inputs (resources), outputs (activities) and socio-demographic variables. Factor analysis was used to reduce as much as possible the number of analysed variables, discriminant analysis to examine the technologies adoption decision, and multiple regression analysis to investigate their use.

Results

Factor analysis identified motivators on adoption and use of CT and MRI medical technologies as follows: hospital inputs/outputs (Factor 1); radiology studies and adoption of CT by public hospitals (Factor 2); research/teaching role and big-ticket diagnostic and therapeutic (lithotripsy) technologies (Factor 3); number of transplants (Factor 4); cancer diagnosis/treatment (Factor 5); and catchment area geographical dispersion (Factor 6). Cronbach’s alpha of 0.881 indicated an acceptable degree of reliability of the factor variables. Regarding adoption of these technologies, Factor 1 is the most influential, explaining 37% of the variance and showing adequate global internal consistency, whereas Factor 2 is limited to 13% of the variance. In the discriminant analysis, values for Box’s M test and canonical correlations such as Wilks’s lambda for the two technologies underpin the reliability and predictive capacity of the discriminant equations. Finally, and according to the regression analysis, the factor with the greatest influence on CT and MRI use is Factor 2, followed by Factors 1 and 3 in the case of CT use, and Factors 3 and 5 in the case of MRI use.

Conclusion

CT and MRI adoption by public hospitals is mainly determined by hospital inputs and outputs. However, the use of both medical technologies is mainly influenced by conventional radiology studies and CT adoption. These results suggest that both choices – adoption and use of advanced medical technology – may be separate decisions as they are taken possibly by different people (the former by managers and policymakers and the latter by physicians).

A Novel Cancer Stemness-Related Signature for Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Colon Adenocarcinoma

Objective

To explore the cancer stemness features and develop a novel cancer stemness-related prognostic signature for colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).

Methods

We downloaded the mRNA expression data and clinical data of COAD from TCGA database and GEO database. Stemness index, mRNAsi, was utilized to investigate cancer stemness features. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify cancer stemness-related genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to construct a prognostic risk cancer stemness-related signature. We then performed internal and external validation. The relationship between cancer stemness and COAD immune microenvironment was investigated.

Results

COAD patients with higher mRNAsi score or EREG-mRNAsi score have significant longer overall survival (OS). We identified 483 differently expressed genes (DEGs) between the high and low mRNAsi score groups. We developed a cancer stemness-related signature using fifteen genes (including RAB31, COL6A3, COL5A2, CCDC80, ADAM12, VGLL3, ECM2, POSTN, DPYSL3, PCDH7, CRISPLD2, COLEC12, NRP2, ISLR, and CCDC8) for prognosis prediction of COAD. Low-risk score was associated with significantly preferable OS in comparison with high-risk score, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for OS prediction was 0.705. The prognostic signature was an independent predictor for OS of COAD. Macrophages, mast cells, and T helper cells were the vital infiltration immune cells, and APC costimulation and type II IFN response were the vital immune pathways in COAD.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a novel cancer stemness-related prognostic signature for COAD, which would contribute to understanding of molecular mechanism in COAD.

Integrative analysis of ceRNA network reveals functional lncRNAs associated with independent recurrent prognosis in colon adenocarcinoma

Background

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), acting as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) have been reported to regulate the expression of targeted genes by sponging miRNA in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD).

Methods

However, their potential implications for recurrence free survival prognosis and functional roles remains largely unclear in COAD. In this study, we downloaded the TCGA dataset (training dataset) and GSE39582 (validation dataset) of COAD patients with prognostic information.

Results

A total of 411 differentially expressed genes (DElncRNAs: 12 downregulated and 43 upregulated), 18 DE miRNAs (9 downregulated and 9 upregulated) and 338 DEmRNAs (113 downregulated and 225 upregulated) were identified in recurrence samples compared with non-recurrence samples with the thresholds of FDR < 0.05 and |log₂FC|> 0.263. Based on six signature lncRNAs (LINC00899, LINC01503, PRKAG2-AS1, RAD21-AS1, SRRM2-AS1 and USP30-AS1), the risk score (RS) system was constructed. Two prognostic clinical features, including pathologic stage and RS model status were screened for building the nomogram survival model. Moreover, a recurrent-specific ceRNA network was successfully constructed with 2 signature lncRNAs, 4 miRNAs and 113 mRNAs. Furthermore, we further manifested that SRRM2-AS1 predicted a poor prognosis in COAD patients. Furthermore, knockdown of SRRM2-AS1 significantly suppressed cell proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT markers in HT-29 and SW1116 cells.

Conclusion

These identified novel lncRNA signature and ceRNA network associated with recurrence prognosis might provide promising therapeutic targets for COAD patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-021-02069-6.

Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is, besides breast, prostate, lung and skin cancers, the most common cancer worldwide and is suitable for screening. The incidence of CRC varies considerably in different parts of the world: in well-developed countries, the incidence is between 30 and 70 per 100 000 inhabitants, whereas in less-developed countries such as sub-Saharan Africa, it is 10-20/100 000 inhabitants. Women have a lower incidence of CRC, which is usually one-third of total incidence. Several studies have shown that it is possible to decrease mortality from CRC with about 20%, which is evidenced through the data from countries with screening programmes. Though the method of choice to identify blood samples in faecal matter is under debate, the most feasible way is to perform colonoscopy. Other methods include more advanced faecal analyses, testing for mutations from CRC, sigmoidoscopy, CT colonoscopy or optical colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is in most countries not available in sufficient amount and has to be carried out with great accuracy; otherwise, lesions will be missed to identify, thus leading to complications. Gender is an issue in CRC screening, as women have about 20% fewer colorectal adenomas and CRCs, but they also have more right-sided lesions, which are more difficult to detect with tests for faecal blood since they create less blood in faeces. Thus, other strategies may have to be developed for women in order for screening to have the same effect. It is essential to introduce colorectal cancer screening in all countries together with other clinical pieces of advice such as information on smoking, obesity and exercise in order to reduce one of the most dangerous cancers.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and women in the United States. CRC screening efforts are directed toward removal of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions and detection of early-stage CRC. The purpose of this article is to update the 2009 American College of Gastroenterology CRC screening guidelines. The guideline is framed around several key questions. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to include studies through October 2020. The inclusion criteria were studies of any design with men and women age 40 years and older. Detailed recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals and those with a family history of CRC are discussed. We also provide recommendations on the role of aspirin for chemoprevention, quality indicators for colonoscopy, approaches to organized CRC screening and improving adherence to CRC screening. CRC screening must be optimized to allow effective and sustained reduction of CRC incidence and mortality. This can be accomplished by achieving high rates of adherence, quality monitoring and improvement, following evidence-based guidelines, and removing barriers through the spectrum of care from noninvasive screening tests to screening and diagnostic colonoscopy. The development of cost-effective, highly accurate, noninvasive modalities associated with improved overall adherence to the screening process is also a desirable goal.

Bowel cancer screening workforce survey: developing the endoscopy workforce for 2025 and beyond

AIM

The demand for bowel cancer screening (BCS) is expected to increase significantly within the next decade. Little is known about the intentions of the workforce required to meet this demand. The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG), the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) developed the first BCS workforce survey. The aim was to assess endoscopist career intentions to aid in future workforce planning to meet the anticipated increase in BCS colonoscopy.

METHODS

A survey was developed by JAG, BSG and ACPGBI and disseminated to consultant, clinical and trainee endoscopists between February and April 2020. Descriptive and comparative analyses were undertaken, supported with BCS data.

RESULTS

There were 578 respondents. Screening consultants have a median of one programmed activity (PA) per week for screening, accounting for 40% of their current endoscopy workload. 38% of current screening consultants are considering giving up colonoscopy in the next 2-5 years. Retirement (58%) and pension issues (23%) are the principle reasons for this. Consultants would increase their screening PAs by 70% if able to do so. The top three activities that endoscopists would relinquish to further support screening were outpatient clinics, acute medical/surgical on call and ward cover. An extra 155 colonoscopists would be needed to fulfil increased demand and planned retirement at current PAs.

CONCLUSION

This survey has identified a serious potential shortfall in screening colonoscopists in the next 5-10 years due to an ageing workforce and job plan pressures of aspirant BCS colonoscopists. We have outlined potential mitigations including reviewing job plans, improving workforce resources and supporting accreditation and training.

Evaluation of vascular anatomy for colon cancer located in the splenic flexure using the preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography angiography with colonography

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to reveal the vascular branching variation in SFC (splenic flexure cancer) patients using the preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography angiography with colonography (3D-CTAC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with SFC who underwent preoperative 3D-CTAC between January 2014 and December 2019.

RESULTS

Among 1256 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, 96 (7.6%) manifested SFC. The arterial branching from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was classified into five patterns, as follows: (type 1A) the left branch of middle colic artery (LMCA) diverged from middle colic artery (MCA) (N = 47, 49.0%); (2A) the LMCA diverged from the MCA and the accessory middle colic artery (AMCA) (N = 26, 27.1%); (3A) the LMCA independently diverged from the SMA (N = 16, 16.7%); (4A) the LMCA independently diverged from the SMA and AMCA (N = 3, 3.1%); (5A) only the AMCA and the LMCA was absent (N = 4, 4.1%). Venous drainage was classified into four patterns, as follows: (type 1V) the SFV flows into the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) then back to the splenic vein (N = 50, 52.1%); (2V) the SFV flows into the IMV then back to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) (N = 19, 19.8%); (type 3V) the SFV independently flows into the splenic vein (N = 3, 3.1%); (type 4V) the SFV is absent (N = 24, 25.0%).

CONCLUSION

3D-CTAC could reveal accurate preoperative tumor localization and vascular branching. These classifications should be helpful in performing accurate complete mesocolic excision and central vessel ligation for SFC.

Cutoff of 25% for Ki67 expression is a good classification tool for prognosis in colorectal cancer in the AJCC‑8 stratification

Ki‑67 expression has been widely used in clinical practice as an index to evaluate the proliferative activity of tumor cells. The cutoff for Ki67 expression in order to increase the prognostic value of Ki67 expression in colorectal cancer varies. The present study assessed the relationship between the 25% cutoff for Ki67 expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer in the AJCC‑8 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 8 edition) stratification. The current trial included 1,090 colorectal cancer patients enrolled from 2006 to 2012 at Huzhou Central Hospital. Ki67 expression was classified according to 25% intervals, dividing the patients into four groups. Measurement data were analyzed by ANOVA, and count data by Crosstabs. Bivariate correlation analysis was performed to assess clinicopathological indicators based on Ki67 expression. Disease‑free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on Ki67 levels were analyzed by the Kaplan‑Meier method. A total of 1,090 patients of the 2,080 enrolled CRC cases were evaluated (52.4%). Invasive depth, tumor differentiation, tumor size, AJCC‑8, positive number of lymph nodes and chemotherapy status showed significant differences in the various Ki67 expression groups (all P<0.05), with significant correlations (Spearman rho: 0.170, 0.456, 0.22, 0.195, 0.514 and ‑0.201, respectively, all P<0.001). DFS and OS for the different Ki67 level groups based on AJCC‑8 stratification were analyzed, and no significance was found in stage IV (P=0.334). DFS and OS survival rates were assessed at different Ki67 expression levels, and no significant differences were found (all P>0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that invasive depth, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, AJCC‑8 and Ki67 were independent factors affecting colorectal cancer (P=0.030, all others P<0.001). In conclusion, a cutoff of 25% for Ki67 expression is a good classification tool. High Ki67 has a close association with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and independently predicts prognosis in the AJCC‑8 stratification.

A 6 lncRNA-Based Risk Score System for Predicting the Recurrence of Colon Adenocarcinoma Patients

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is a common type of colon cancer, and post-operative recurrence and metastasis may occur in COAD patients. This study is designed to build a risk score system for COAD patients. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset of COAD (the training set) was downloaded, and GSE17538 and GSE39582 (the validation sets) from Gene Expression Omnibus database were obtained. The differentially expressed RNAs (DERs) were analyzed by limma package. Using survival package, the independent prognosis-associated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were selected for constructing risk score system. After the independent clinical prognostic factors were screened out using survival package, a nomogram survival model was constructed using rms package. Furthermore, competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory network and enrichment analyses separately were performed using Cytoscape software and DAVID tool. Totally 404 DERs between recurrence and non-recurrence groups were identified. Based on the six independent prognosis-associated lncRNAs (including H19, KCNJ2-AS1, LINC00899, LINC01503, PRKAG2-AS1, and SRRM2-AS1), the risk score system was constructed. After the independent clinical prognostic factors (Pathologic M, pathologic T, and RS model status) were identified, the nomogram survival model was built. In the ceRNA regulatory network, there were three lncRNAs, four miRNAs, and 77 mRNAs. Additionally, PPAR signaling pathway and hedgehog signaling pathway were enriched for the mRNAs in the ceRNA regulatory network. The risk score system and the nomogram survival model might be used for predicting COAD recurrence. Besides, PPAR signaling pathway and hedgehog signaling pathway might affect the recurrence of COAD patients.

Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Robotic colonoscopy (RC) is a pneumatically-driven self-propelling platform (Endotics System®) able to investigate the colon, in order to reduce pain and discomfort.

AIMS

(1) to describe the progress in gaining experience and skills of a trainee in RC; (2) to show the clinical outcomes of RC.

METHODS

Pilot study. An experienced endoscopist started a training on RC whose progress was assessed comparing the results of 2 consecutive blocks of 27 (Group A) and 28 (Group B) procedures. CIR (Cecal Intubation Rate), CIT (Cecal Intubation Time) and Withdrawal Time (WT) were measured. Polyp Detection Rate (PDR), Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) and Advanced Neoplasia Detection Rate (ANDR) were calculated. Possible adverse events were recorded. At the end of the procedure all patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS) to measure their perceived pain during RC and reported their willingness to repeat RC.

RESULTS

General CIR was 92.7%, reaching 100% in Group B. Comparing the two groups, CIT significantly decreased from 55 to 22 min (p value 0.0007), whereas procedures with CIT ≤ 20 min increased (p value 0.037). WT significatively reduced from 21 to 16 min (p value 0.0186). PDR was 40% (males 62.5%, females 14.3%). ADR was 26.7% (males 27.5%, females 14.3%). Most of patients judged the procedure as mild or no distress, with high willingness-to-repeat the RC (92.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results about RC are encouraging as preliminary experience, with clear individual learning progress, accurate diagnosis in a painless or comfortable procedure and with possibility to remove polypoid lesions. Studies with larger populations are needed to confirm obtained results.

[Colorectal cancer: role of imaging in screening]

CLINICAL PROBLEM

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Most colorectal cancers derive from benign precursor lesions, so-called adenomatous polyps, over a long period of time. Colorectal cancer screening is based on the detection of precancerous polyps and early stage CRC in asymptomatic individuals to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. The protective effect of screening programs can be improved by increasing the screening rates.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Apart from the established examinations, CT colonography (CTC) has been proposed as an optional test for colorectal cancer screening. The detection rates of CTC for large polyps and cancer are similar to the ones of colonoscopy and superior to stool-based tests. CTC is therefore the radiological test of choice for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. It has replaced double contrast barium enema for almost all indications. As a minimally invasive procedure, CTC has a high safety profile and good patient acceptance. The evaluation of extracolonic organs in addition to the colon can increase examination efficacy. The option to choose CTC as a CRC screening test has the potential to increase the overall screening rates.