Impact factors for safety, success, duration and radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions

Factors affecting radiation dose, radiation exposure time and procedural time in arterial embolization for active hemorrhage

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient and procedure-related factors contributing to the radiation dose, cumulative fluoroscopy time (CFT), and procedural time (PT) of Arterial Embolization (AE) for suspected active bleeding.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent AE for suspected bleeding was retrospectively gathered between January 2019 and April 2022. Data collected included the dependent variables consisting of dose-area product (DAP), CFT, PT, and independent variables consisting of demographic, bleeding-specific, and procedure-specific parameters. All statistical computations were performed in SPSS statistics. The alpha value was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 148 AE were collected with an average patient's age of 61.06 ± 21.57 years. Higher DAP was independently associated with male sex (p < 0.002), age ranges between 46 and 65 years (p = 0.019) and > 66 years (p = 0.027), BMI above 30 (p = 0.016), attending with less than 10 years of experience (p = 0.01), and bleeding in the abdomen and pelvis (p = 0.027). Longer CFT was independently associated with attending with less than 10 years of experience (p < 0.001), having 2 (p = 0.004) or > 3 (p = 0.005) foci of bleed, and age between 46 and 65 years (p = 0.007) and ≥ 66 years (p = 0.017). Longer PT was independently associated with attending with less than 10 years of experience (p < 0.001) and having 2 (p = 0.014) or > 3 (p = 0.005) foci of bleed.

CONCLUSION

The interventionist experience influenced radiation dose, CFT and PT. Dose was also affected by patients' sex, age, BMI, as well as bleeding location. CFT was also affected by patients' age, and both CFT and PT were also affected by the number of bleeding foci. These findings highlight the multifaceted factors that affect radiation dose and procedural time, emphasizing the importance of interventionist expertise, patient's age, sex, BMI, location and number of bleeds.

CT-guided percutaneous marking of small pulmonary nodules with [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb is very accurate and allows minimally invasive lung-sparing resection: a single-centre quality control

PURPOSE

The detection of small lung nodules in thoracoscopic procedure is difficult when the lesions are not located within the outer border of the lung. In the case of ground-glass opacities, it is often impossible to palpate the lesion. Marking lung nodules using a radiotracer is a known technique. We analysed the accuracy and safety of the technique and the potential benefits of operating in a hybrid operating room.

METHODS

57 patients, including 33 (58%) females with a median age of 67 years (range 21-82) were included. In 27 patients, we marked and resected the lesion in a hybrid room. In 30 patients, the lesion was marked at the department of radiology the day before resection. [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb (Pulmocis®) was used at an activity of 1 MBq in the hybrid room and at an activity of 3 MBq the day before to get technical feasible results. Radioactivity was detected using the Neoprobe® detection system.

RESULTS

Precise detection and resection of the nodules was possible in 95% of the lesions and in 93% of the patients. Complete thoracoscopic resection was possible in 90% of the patients. Total conversion rate was 10%, but conversion due to failure of the marking of the nodule was observed in only 5% of the patients. Histology revealed 28 (37%) primary lung cancers, 24 (32%) metastases and 21 (28%) benign lesions. In 13 (23%) patients, minor complications were observed. None of them required additional interventions.

CONCLUSION

The radio-guided detection of small pulmonary nodules is very accurate and safe after CT-guided injection of [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb. Performing the operation in a hybrid room has several logistic advantages and allows using lower technetium-99m activities. The technique allows minimally invasive lung sparing resection and prevents overtreatment of benign and metastatic lesions.

First experience of efficacy and radiation exposure in 320-detector row CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy and exposure to radiation in 320-detector row computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided (CTF-guided) interventions.

METHODS

We analysed 231 320-detector row CTF-guided interventions (207 patients over 2 years and 6 months) in terms of technical success rates, clinical success rates, complications, scanner settings, overall radiation doses (dose-length product, mGy*cm), patient doses of peri-interventional CT series, and interventional CT (including CTF), as a retrospective cohort study. The relationships between patient radiation dose and interventional factors were assessed using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall technical success rate was 98.7% (228/231). The technical success rates of biopsies, drainages, and aspirations were 98.7% (154/156), 98.5% (66/67), and 100% (8/8), respectively. The clinical success rate of biopsies was 93.5% (146/156). All three major complications occurred in chest biopsies. The median total radiation dose was 522.4 (393.4-819.8) mGy*cm. Of the total radiation dose, 87% was applied during the pre- and post-interventional CT series. Post-interventional CT accounted for 24.4% of the total radiation dose. Only 11.4% of the dose was applied by CTF-guided intervention. Multilinear regression demonstrated that male sex, body mass index, drainage, intervention time, and helical scan as post-interventional CT were significantly associated with higher dose.

CONCLUSION

The 320-detector row CTF interventions achieved a high success rate. Dose reduction in post-interventional CT provides patient dose reduction without decreasing the technical success rates.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first study on the relationship between various interventional outcomes and patient exposure to radiation in 320-detector row CTF-guided interventions, suggesting a new perspective on dose reduction.

Impact of interventionalist's experience and gender on radiation dose and procedural time in CT-guided interventions-a retrospective analysis of 4380 cases over 10 years

Objectives

To investigate the impact of the interventionalist’s experience and gender on radiation dose and procedural time in CT-guided interventions.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 4380 CT-guided interventions performed at our institution with the same CT scanner from 2009 until 2018, 1287 (29%) by female and 3093 (71%) by male interventionalists. Radiation dose, number of CT fluoroscopy images taken per intervention, total procedural time, type of intervention, and degree of difficulty were derived from the saved dose reports and images. All 16 interventionalists included in this analysis performed their first CT-guided interventions during the study period, and interventions performed by each interventionalist were counted to assess the level of experience for each intervention in terms of the number of prior interventions performed by her or him. The Mann-Whitney U test (MWU test), multivariate regression, and linear mixed model analysis were performed.

Results

Assessment of the impact of gender with the MWU test revealed that female interventionalists took a significantly smaller number of images (p < 0.0001) and achieved a lower dose-length product per intervention (p < 0.0001) while taking more time per intervention (p = 0.0001). This finding was confirmed for most types of interventions when additionally accounting for other possible impact factors in multivariate regression analysis. In linear mixed model analysis, we found that radiation dose, number of images taken per intervention, and procedural time decreased statistically significantly with interventionalist’s experience.

Conclusions

Radiation doses of CT-guided interventions are reduced by interventionalist’s experience and, for most types of interventions, when performed by female interventionalists.

Key Points

• Radiation doses in CT-guided interventions are lower when performed by female interventionalists.

• Procedural times of CT-guided interventions are longer when performed by female interventionalists.

• Radiation doses of CT-guided interventions decrease with the interventionalist’s experience.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07185-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.