Safety, efficacy, and cost-performance of a simplified cryoballoon ablation procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The search for a less invasive and lower cost cryoballoon-based strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has resulted in a simplified procedure that may be suitable for cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Here, we compared procedural characteristics and outcomes between conventional CBA and simple CBA.

METHODS

We enrolled 628 consecutive patients who underwent initial CBA for AF (age, 69 ± 12 years; female, 263 (42%); paroxysmal AF, 576 (92%); CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, 2.7 ± 1.6 points). Simple CBA was characterized by the minimal procedure required to isolate pulmonary veins, including the following: (1) CBA was performed without guidance from a 3-D mapping system; (2) a coronary sinus electrode and esophageal temperature probe were not used; (3) a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation was not set; and AF induction by isoproterenol and atrial burst stimuli were not performed.

RESULTS

Simple CBA was performed in 240 (38%) patients. Procedural time (49 ± 18 versus 85 ± 27 min, p < 0.01) was shorter, and total procedural costs (20,699 ± 8,091 versus 30,350 ± 11,647 US dollars, p < 0.01) were lower with simple CBA than conventional CBA. Freedom from AF recurrence during the 12-month study period (79.8% versus 78.4%, p = 0.52) and complication rate (8.8% versus 13.1%, p = 0.09) were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional CBA, simple CBA reduced procedural time and procedural costs while providing comparable outcomes.

A Patient-Specific Hollow Three-Dimensional Model for Simulating Percutaneous Occlusion of Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Percutaneous catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is difficult when the ductus is large and long or shows calcification. We created a patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D) model for PDA, with which we simulated device deployment, thereby selecting the device/size in a patient-by-patient manner. We assessed whether this 3D model is effective for catheter PDA closure.The 3D model was created in this institute, requiring 3 days and 90 US dollars. After its introduction, 7 consecutive patients (the study group) with severe PDA underwent closure with the aid of the 3D model. The control group consisted of 4 patients before 3D-model introduction, with all having severe PDA: the requirement of computed tomography was considered a criterion of severe or difficult-procedure-requiring PDA.In all study group patients, the devices/sizes could be pre-selected based on the simulation, whereas devices were changed during the procedure in 2 of 4 in the control group. In the study group, compared with the control group, the fluoroscopic (median 31 [interquartile range of 16-42] versus 39 [19-71] minutes, respectively) and total procedural times (median 107 [interquartile range 67-114] versus 124 [78-184] minutes, respectively) were shorter. A questionnaire confirmed the doctors' understanding of the procedure.This 3D model may be effective for percutaneous catheter closure of PDA. This may be especially true in cases of severe or difficult-procedure-requiring PDA.

Minimal Increase in Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Procedural Time with the Use of a Novel Surgical Navigation Tool

Background

Computer-assisted navigation has proven effective at improving the accuracy of component placement during Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA); however, the material costs, line-of-site issues and potential for significant time increases have limited their widespread use.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of an imageless navigation device on surgical time, when compared with standard mechanical guides.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from 61 consecutive primary unilateral THA cases (posterior approach) performed by a single surgeon. Procedural time (incision to closure) for THA performed with (intervention) or without (control) a computer-assisted navigation system was compared. In the intervention group, the additional time associated with the use of the device was recorded. Mean times were compared using independent samples t-tests with statistical significance set a priori at p<0.05.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between procedural time in the intervention and control groups (102.3±28.3 mins vs. 99.1±14.7 mins, p=0.60). The installation and use of the navigation device accounted for an average of 2.9 mins (SD: 1.6) per procedure, of which device-related setup performed prior to skin incision accounted for 1.1 mins (SD: 1.1) and intra-operative tasks accounted for 1.6 mins (SD: 1.2).

Conclusion

In this series of 61 consecutive THAs performed by a single surgeon, the set-up and hands-on utilization of a novel surgical navigation tool required an additional 2.9 minutes per case. We suggest that the intraoperative benefits of this novel computer-assisted navigation platform outweigh the minimal operative time spent using this technology.