1
|
Lapi SE, Scott PJH, Scott AM, Windhorst AD, Zeglis BM, Abdel-Wahab M, Baum RP, Buatti JM, Giammarile F, Kiess AP, Jalilian A, Knoll P, Korde A, Kunikowska J, Lee ST, Paez D, Urbain JL, Zhang J, Lewis JS. Recent advances and impending challenges for the radiopharmaceutical sciences in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e236-e249. [PMID: 38821098 PMCID: PMC11340123 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00030-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
This paper is the first of a Series on theranostics that summarises the current landscape of the radiopharmaceutical sciences as they pertain to oncology. In this Series paper, we describe exciting developments in radiochemistry and the production of radionuclides, the development and translation of theranostics, and the application of artificial intelligence to our field. These developments are catalysing growth in the use of radiopharmaceuticals to the benefit of patients worldwide. We also highlight some of the key issues to be addressed in the coming years to realise the full potential of radiopharmaceuticals to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne E Lapi
- Departments of Radiology and Chemistry, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peter J H Scott
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brian M Zeglis
- Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard P Baum
- Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik (DKD Helios Klinik) Wiesbaden, Curanosticum MVZ Wiesbaden-Frankfurt, Center for Advanced Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Germany
| | - John M Buatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria; Centre Leon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Ana P Kiess
- Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amirreza Jalilian
- Radiochemistry and Radiotechnology Section, Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Knoll
- Dosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aruna Korde
- Radiochemistry and Radiotechnology Section, Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jolanta Kunikowska
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Diana Paez
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-Luc Urbain
- Department of Radiology-Nuclear Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jason S Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Franco M, Zanoni L, Fortunati E, Fanti S, Ambrosini V. Radionuclide Theranostics in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Update. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:538-550. [PMID: 38581469 PMCID: PMC11063107 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01526-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper aims to address the latest findings in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) theranostics, focusing on new evidence and future directions of combined diagnosis with positron emission tomography (PET) and treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). RECENT FINDINGS Following NETTER-1 trial, PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE was approved by FDA and EMA and is routinely employed in advanced G1 and G2 SST (somatostatin receptor)-expressing NET. Different approaches have been proposed so far to improve the PRRT therapeutic index, encompassing re-treatment protocols, combinations with other therapies and novel indications. Molecular imaging holds a potential added value in characterizing disease biology and heterogeneity using different radiopharmaceuticals (e.g., SST and FDG) and may provide predictive and prognostic parameters. Response assessment criteria are still an unmet need and new theranostic pairs showed preliminary encouraging results. PRRT for NET has become a paradigm of modern theranostics. PRRT holds a favorable toxicity profile, and it is associated with a prolonged time to progression, reduction of symptoms, and improved patients' quality of life. In light of further optimization, different new strategies have been investigated, along with the development of new radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Di Franco
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Lucia Zanoni
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emilia Fortunati
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ebbers SC, Barentsz MW, de Vries-Huizing DMV, Versleijen MWJ, Klompenhouwer EG, Tesselaar MET, Stokkel MPM, Brabander T, Hofland J, Moelker A, van Leeuwaarde RS, Smits MLJ, Braat AJAT, Lam MGEH. Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1121-1132. [PMID: 37897617 PMCID: PMC10881701 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06467-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity. METHODS Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test. FINDINGS After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle. CONCLUSION Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C Ebbers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - M W Barentsz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - D M V de Vries-Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E G Klompenhouwer
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E T Tesselaar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R S van Leeuwaarde
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Puranik AD, Rangarajan V, Shetty NS, Gala K, Kulkarni S, Mohite A, Marotkar M, Gawale Y, Dev ID, Shrikhande SV, Chaudhari V, Bhandare M, Agrawal A, Shah S, Purandare NC, Ghosh S, Choudhury S. Intra-arterial PRRT with Lu-177 DOTATATE in Liver-dominant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Early Assessment of Efficacy and Toxicity. Indian J Nucl Med 2024; 39:71-76. [PMID: 38989301 PMCID: PMC11232720 DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_7_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose We proposed to administer Lu-177-DOTATATE in intra-arterial (IA) mode for higher first-pass localization to somatostatin receptors, higher residence time in liver metastases, and more radiation to tumor. This study aimed at assessing early hematological, renal and hepatotoxicity; and objective response to IA peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Materials and Methods Fourteen patients (4 females and 10 males) were prospectively assessed. 5/14 patients underwent 2 cycles, whereas 3/14 underwent 3 cycles, and 6/14 received 1 cycle of IA PRRT. 200 mCi of Lu-177-DOTATATE was administered in 15-20 min by IA route under angiographic guidance. Patients were asked to follow-up at 4 and 8 weeks with hematological, liver, and renal functional parameters, and Ga-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after 8 weeks. Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 and EORTC PET criteria. Results Safety: 2/14 patients had high total and direct bilirubin, which reverted to normal after IA PRRT. Three patients had low albumin, which improved after 1 cycle. Nine patients showed no worsening of liver function. Two patients showed Grade 1 hematotoxicity which reverted to normal. Five patients showed high creatinine, but preserved glomerular filtration rate and EC clearance. On follow-up at 8 weeks, serum creatinine reverted to normal. Efficacy: In five patients who underwent 2 cycles of IA PRRT, 3 showed partial response (PR) on RECIST 1.1 and partial metabolic response (PMR) on EORTC criteria, whereas 2 showed stable disease (SD). In patients who underwent 3 cycles, 1 showed SD, whereas other patient showed PMR on DOTANOC PET/CT, with PR in size. Among the remaining seven patients, 5 showed PMR, whereas the other 2 showed SD. Thus 9/14 patients showed PR, whereas 5 showed SD on metabolic and size criteria. Conclusions IA PRRT is a safe and efficacious approach for the treatment of liver dominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya D Puranik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Venkatesh Rangarajan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nitin Sudhakar Shetty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal Gala
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ashish Mohite
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mandar Marotkar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Yogesh Gawale
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Indraja D Dev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikram Chaudhari
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Manish Bhandare
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Archi Agrawal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sneha Shah
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nilendu C Purandare
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suchismita Ghosh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sayak Choudhury
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khanjyan MV, Fidelman N. Intra-arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Hepatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases: Hope or Hype? Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:11-15. [PMID: 38495261 PMCID: PMC10940035 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) confers significant progression-free survival advantage for patients with small bowel grade 1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NET). PRRT may also be clinically beneficial for patients with NET of pancreatic, bronchial, and other sites of origin; patients with paragangliomas; as well as for patients with well-differentiated grade 3 NET. Direct intra-arterial (IA) administration of PRRT into the hepatic artery for patients with NET liver metastases may result in higher radiopharmaceutical dose and longer dwell time in the liver tumors while relatively sparing non-tumor liver tissue and other organs such as the kidneys and bone marrow when compared with intravenous (IV) administration. This review summarizes currently available data on IA and IV PRRT dose distribution, reports safety and efficacy of IA PRRT, and proposes future research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael V Khanjyan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Nicholas Fidelman
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nautiyal A, Jha AK, Konuparamban A, Mithun S, Srichandan T, Puranik A, Gala K, Shetty N, Kulkarni S, Rangarajan V. A dosimetric comparison of systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and intra-arterial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with liver dominant gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:585-595. [PMID: 37038926 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intra-arterial radionuclide therapy (IART) treatment allows direct delivery of 177 Lu-DOTATATE to the overexpressed somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine liver metastases, which led to higher tumour concentration compared with systemic radionuclide therapy (SRT). The aim was to evaluate and compare the absorbed doses of both IART and SRT to organs and hepatic metastatic sites. METHODS A total of 48 patients received SRT and IART. In SRT, activity was administered intravenously, whereas in IART, activity was administered directly into hepatic arteries. The sequential whole-body images were acquired at 2, 4, 24, 72 and 160 h. The reconstructed whole-body planar and single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography images were processed using the Dosimetry Toolkit for the estimation of normalized cumulated activity in the organs and tumour lesions. The absorbed dose was computed using OLINDA EXM 2.0 software. RESULTS The median absorbed dose (mGy/MBq) of kidneys and spleen in IART was compared with SRT and found to be decreased by 30.7% ( P = 0.03) and 37.5% ( P = 0.08), whereas it was found to be increased by 40% ( P = 0.26) and 8.1% ( P = 0.28) in the liver and lungs. The median dose (mGy/MBq) of tumours determined in IART was found to be increased by 62.2% ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSION IART with 177 Lu-DOTATATE significantly increases tumour dose while reducing overall systemic toxicity in comparison to SRT treatment. After considering the maximum tolerance limit of kidneys in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, the number of treatment cycles and injected activity can be optimized further with IART for better response and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Nautiyal
- Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
| | - Ashish K Jha
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Acsah Konuparamban
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Sneha Mithun
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | - Ameya Puranik
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Kunal Gala
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nithin Shetty
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Venkatesh Rangarajan
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kauffman N, Morrison J, O’Brien K, Fan J, Zinn KR. Intra-Arterial Delivery of Radiopharmaceuticals in Oncology: Current Trends and the Future of Alpha-Particle Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041138. [PMID: 37111624 PMCID: PMC10144492 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A paradigm shift is underway in cancer diagnosis and therapy using radioactivity-based agents called radiopharmaceuticals. In the new strategy, diagnostic imaging measures the tumor uptake of radioactive agent “X” in a patient’s specific cancer, and if uptake metrics are realized, the patient can be selected for therapy with radioactive agent “Y”. The X and Y represent different radioisotopes that are optimized for each application. X–Y pairs are known as radiotheranostics, with the currently approved route of therapy being intravenous administration. The field is now evaluating the potential of intra-arterial dosing of radiotheranostics. In this manner, a higher initial concentration can be achieved at the cancer site, which could potentially enhance tumor-to-background targeting and lead to improved imaging and therapy. Numerous clinical trials are underway to evaluate these new therapeutic approaches that can be performed via interventional radiology. Of further interest is changing the therapeutic radioisotope that provides radiation therapy by β- emission to radioisotopes that also decay by α-particle emissions. Alpha (α)-particle emissions provide high energy transfer to the tumors and have distinct advantages. This review discusses the current landscape of intra-arterially delivered radiopharmaceuticals and the future of α-particle therapy with short-lived radioisotopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Kauffman
- Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - James Morrison
- Advanced Radiology Services, 3264 N Evergreen Dr, Grand Rapids, MI 49525, USA
| | - Kevin O’Brien
- Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Jinda Fan
- Departments of Radiology and Chemistry, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Kurt R. Zinn
- Departments of Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hofland J, Brabander T, Verburg FA, Feelders RA, de Herder WW. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:3199-3208. [PMID: 36198028 PMCID: PMC9693835 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The concept of using a targeting molecule labeled with a diagnostic radionuclide for using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography imaging with the potential to demonstrate that tumoricidal radiation can be delivered to tumoral sites by administration of the same or a similar targeting molecule labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide termed "theranostics." Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is a well-established second/third-line theranostic treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated (neuro-)endocrine neoplasms (NENs). PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE was approved by the regulatory authorities in 2017 and 2018 for selected patients with low-grade well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs. It improves progression-free survival as well as quality of life of GEP NEN patients. Favorable symptomatic and biochemical responses using PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE have also been reported in patients with functioning metastatic GEP NENs like metastatic insulinomas, Verner Morrison syndromes (VIPomas), glucagonomas, and gastrinomas and patients with carcinoid syndrome. This therapy might also become a valuable therapeutic option for inoperable low-grade bronchopulmonary NENs, inoperable or progressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and medullary thyroid carcinomas. First-line PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE and combinations of this therapy with cytotoxic drugs are currently under investigation. New radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands include SSAs coupled with alpha radiation emitting radionuclides and somatostatin receptor antagonists coupled with radionuclides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik A Verburg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard A Feelders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- Correspondence: Wouter W. de Herder, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lewandowski RJ, Toskich BB, Brown DB, El-Haddad G, Padia SA. Role of Radioembolization in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1590-1598. [PMID: 35918431 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03206-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The liver is the most common site of metastasis for neuroendocrine tumors originating from the gastrointestinal tract. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) portend a worsening clinical course, making local management important. Local treatment options include surgery, thermal ablation, and trans-catheter intra-arterial therapies, such as radioembolization. Radioembolization is generally preferred over other embolotherapies in patients with colonized biliary systems. Current best practice involves personalized treatment planning, optimizing tumor radiation absorbed dose and minimizing radiation to the normal hepatic parenchyma. As part of a multidisciplinary approach, radioembolization is a versatile embolotherapy offering neoadjuvant, palliative, and ablative treatment options for patients with NELMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel B Brown
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Siddharth A Padia
- Division of Interventional Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Roytman M, Kim S, Glynn S, Thomas C, Lin E, Feltus W, Magge RS, Liechty B, Schwartz TH, Ramakrishna R, Karakatsanis NA, Pannullo SC, Osborne JR, Knisely JPS, Ivanidze J. PET/MR Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor Expression and Tumor Vascularity in Meningioma: Implications for Pathophysiology and Tumor Outcomes. Front Oncol 2022; 11:820287. [PMID: 35155210 PMCID: PMC8832502 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.820287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial tumor, are vascular neoplasms that express somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate if a relationship exists between tumor vascularity and SSTR2 expression, which may play a role in meningioma prognostication and clinical management. Materials and Methods Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion was prospectively performed. Clinical and demographic patient characteristics were recorded. Tumor volumes were segmented and superimposed onto parametric DCE maps including flux rate constant (Kep), transfer constant (Ktrans), extravascular volume fraction (Ve), and plasma volume fraction (Vp). Meningioma PET standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUV ratio to superior sagittal sinus (SUVRSSS) were recorded. Pearson correlation analyses were performed. In a random subset, analysis was repeated by a second investigator, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were determined. Results Thirty-six patients with 60 meningiomas (20 WHO-1, 27 WHO-2, and 13 WHO-3) were included. Mean Kep demonstrated a strong significant positive correlation with SUV (r = 0.84, p < 0.0001) and SUVRSSS (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001). When stratifying by WHO grade, this correlation persisted in WHO-2 (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) and WHO-3 (r = 0.92, p = 0.0029) but not WHO-1 (r = 0.26, p = 0.4, SUVRSSS). ICC was excellent (0.97–0.99). Conclusion DOTATATE PET/MRI demonstrated a strong significant correlation between tumor vascularity and SSTR2 expression in WHO-2 and WHO-3, but not WHO-1 meningiomas, suggesting biological differences in the relationship between tumor vascularity and SSTR2 expression in higher-grade meningiomas, the predictive value of which will be tested in future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Roytman
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sean Kim
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shannon Glynn
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Charlene Thomas
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eaton Lin
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Whitney Feltus
- Departments of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rajiv S. Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Benjamin Liechty
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Theodore H. Schwartz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nicolas A. Karakatsanis
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Susan C. Pannullo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joseph R. Osborne
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan P. S. Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Jana Ivanidze,
| |
Collapse
|