Patient dosimetry in interventional radiology using slow films

Efforts to optimize radiation protection in interventional fluoroscopy

While it has been known for more than a century that radiation presents risks to both the physician and the patient, skin injuries from fluoroscopy became increasingly rare after the 1930s, and radiation risk from fluoroscopy appeared to be adequately controlled. However, beginning in approximately 1975, new technologies and materials for interventional devices were developed. These enabled new procedures, and as these were instituted, skin injuries again occurred in patients. Four central issues were identified: equipment, quality management, operator training, and occupational radiation protection. Recognition that these were areas for improvement provoked changes in technology and practice that continue today.

ICRP PUBLICATION 120: Radiological protection in cardiology

Cardiac nuclear medicine, cardiac computed tomography (CT), interventional cardiology procedures, and electrophysiology procedures are increasing in number and account for an important share of patient radiation exposure in medicine. Complex percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiac electrophysiology procedures are associated with high radiation doses. These procedures can result in patient skin doses that are high enough to cause radiation injury and an increased risk of cancer. Treatment of congenital heart disease in children is of particular concern. Additionally, staff(1) in cardiac catheterisation laboratories may receive high doses of radiation if radiological protection tools are not used properly. The Commission provided recommendations for radiological protection during fluoroscopically guided interventions in Publication 85, for radiological protection in CT in Publications 87 and 102, and for training in radiological protection in Publication 113 (ICRP, 2000b,c, 2007a, 2009). This report is focused specifically on cardiology, and brings together information relevant to cardiology from the Commission's published documents. There is emphasis on those imaging procedures and interventions specific to cardiology. The material and recommendations in the current document have been updated to reflect the most recent recommendations of the Commission. This report provides guidance to assist the cardiologist with justification procedures and optimisation of protection in cardiac CT studies, cardiac nuclear medicine studies, and fluoroscopically guided cardiac interventions. It includes discussions of the biological effects of radiation, principles of radiological protection, protection of staff during fluoroscopically guided interventions, radiological protection training, and establishment of a quality assurance programme for cardiac imaging and intervention. As tissue injury, principally skin injury, is a risk for fluoroscopically guided interventions, particular attention is devoted to clinical examples of radiation-related skin injuries from cardiac interventions, methods to reduce patient radiation dose, training recommendations, and quality assurance programmes for interventional fluoroscopy.

Patient skin dose measurements during coronary interventional procedures using Gafchromic film

Interventional cardiology (IC) procedures are known to give high radiation doses to patients and cardiologists as they involve long fluoroscopy times and several cine runs. Patients' dose measurements were carried out at the cardiology department in a local hospital in Penang, Malaysia, using Gafchromic XR-RV2 films. The dosimetric properties of the Gafchromic film were first characterised. The film was energy and dose rate independent but dose dependent for the clinically used values. The film had reproducibility within ± 3% when irradiated on three different days and hence the same XR-RV2 dose-response calibration curve can be used to obtain patient entrance skin dose on different days. The increase in the response of the film post-irradiation was less than 4% over a period of 35 days. For patient dose measurements, the films were placed on the table underneath the patient for an under-couch tube position. This study included a total of 44 patients. Values of 35-2442 mGy for peak skin dose (PSD) and 10.9-344.4 Gy cm(2) for dose-area product (DAP) were obtained. DAP was found to be a poor indicator of PSD for PTCA procedures but there was a better correlation (R(2) = 0.7344) for CA + PTCA procedures. The highest PSD value in this study exceeded the threshold dose value of 2 Gy for early transient skin injury recommended by the Food and Drug Administration.

Radiation dose and radiation protection for patients and physicians during interventional procedure

Although the wide acceptance of interventional radiology (IVR) procedures has led to increasing numbers of interventions being performed, the radiation doses from IVR are higher. Increasing numbers of case reports of patient radiation injury resulting from IVR are being published. Therefore, radiation protection during IVR poses a very important problem. To protect against radiation injury, the evaluation of radiation dose is essential. The radiation dose must be evaluated for each IVR x-ray machine and each laboratory, because it varies greatly. To obtain this information easily, and to ensure practical use of the radiation information, good relationships between interventionists and medical physicists are essential.

Patient and staff doses for some complex x-ray examinations

The aim of this study was to measure patient and staff doses simultaneously for some complex x-ray examinations. Measurements of dose-area product (DAP) and entrance skin dose (ESD) were carried out in a sample of 107 adult patients who underwent different x-ray examinations such as double contrast barium enema (DCBE), single contrast barium enema (SCBE), barium swallow, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), and various orthopaedic surgical procedures. Dose measurements were made separately for each projection, and DAP, thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD), film dosimetry and tube output measurement techniques were used. Staff doses were measured simultaneously with patient doses for these examinations, with the exception of barium procedures. The measured mean DAP values were found to be 8.33, 90.24, 79.96 Gy cm(2) for barium swallow, SCBE and DCBE procedures with the fluoroscopy times of 3.1, 4.43 and 5.86 min, respectively. The calculated mean DAP was 26.33 Gy cm(2) for diagnostic and 89.76 Gy cm(2) therapeutic ERCP examinations with the average fluoroscopy times of 1.9 and 5.06 min respectively. Similarly, the calculated mean DAP was 97.53 Gy cm(2) with a corresponding fluoroscopy time of 6.1 min for PTC studies. The calculated mean entrance skin dose (ESD) was 172 mGy for the orthopaedic surgical studies. Maximum skin doses were measured as 324, 891, 1218, 750, 819 and 1397 mGy for barium swallow, SCBE, DCBE, ERCP, PTC and orthopaedic surgical procedures, respectively. The high number of radiographs taken during barium enema examinations, and the high x-ray outputs of the fluoroscopic units used in ERCP, were the main reasons for high doses, and some corrective actions were immediately taken.

Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog

Medical uses of radiation have grown very rapidly over the past decade, and, as of 2007, medical uses represent the largest source of exposure to the U.S. population. Most physicians have difficulty assessing the magnitude of exposure or potential risk. Effective dose provides an approximate indicator of potential detriment from ionizing radiation and should be used as one parameter in evaluating the appropriateness of examinations involving ionizing radiation. The purpose of this review is to provide a compilation of effective doses for radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures. Standard radiographic examinations have average effective doses that vary by over a factor of 1000 (0.01-10 mSv). Computed tomographic examinations tend to be in a more narrow range but have relatively high average effective doses (approximately 2-20 mSv), and average effective doses for interventional procedures usually range from 5-70 mSv. Average effective dose for most nuclear medicine procedures varies between 0.3 and 20 mSv. These doses can be compared with the average annual effective dose from background radiation of about 3 mSv.

Double stenting procedure and coil embolization in a patient with carotid stenosis and incidental ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm. A case report and dosimetric evaluation

We describe a case of incidental detection of an intracranial left ICA wide-necked aneurysm during digital subtraction angiography performed to assess a sub-occlusive and calcified stenosis in the extracranial portion of the same artery. Angioplasty and stenting of ICA stenosis, plus intracranial stent deployment across the aneurysm neck was performed during the same procedure. Aneurysm coil embolization was postponed to a further session one month later. The radiation dose and irradiated areas were also evaluated during endovascular procedures.

Patient and staff dosimetry in vertebroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Eleven vertebroplasty operations were studied in terms of radiation dose.

OBJECTIVE

Doses to patients and staff associated with vertebroplasty were measured. Occupational doses were compared with the annual dose limits, and the effectiveness of the used radiation protection means was estimated. Patient dose was estimated by means of both surface and effective dose, and the radiation-induced risk was evaluated.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebroplasty is a recent minimally invasive technique for the restoration of vertebral body fractures. It involves fluoroscopic exposure, and so, it demands dose measurements for both patient and staff exposed to radiation.

METHODS

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on the medical personnel and the effective dose was derived. Slow films were placed to patients' skin to measure entrance surface dose. Furthermore, a Rando phantom loaded with TLDs was irradiated under conditions simulating vertebroplasty, in order to estimate effective dose to the patient.

RESULTS

Mean fluoroscopy time was 27.7 minutes. Patient's mean skin dose was 688 mGy, while effective dose was calculated to be 34.45 mGy. It was estimated that the primary operator can perform about 150 vertebroplasty operations annually without exceeding the annual dose constraints, whereas occupational dose can be reduced by 76% using mobile shielding.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures have to be taken to reduce patient's skin dose, which, in extreme cases, may be close to deterministic effects threshold. The highest dose rates, recorded during the procedure, were found for primary operator's hands and chest when no shielding was used.

Kodak EDR2 film for patient skin dose assessment in cardiac catheterization procedures

Patient skin doses were measured using Kodak EDR2 film for 20 coronary angiography (CA) and 32 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures. For CA, all skin doses were well below 1 Gy. However, 23% of PTCA patients received skin doses of 1 Gy or more. Dose-area product (DAP) was also recorded and was found to be an inadequate indicator of maximum skin dose. Practical compliance with ICRP recommendations requires a robust method for skin dosimetry that is more accurate than DAP and is applicable over a wider dose range than EDR2 film.

Patient radiation exposure measurements during interventional procedures: a prospective study

This is a prospective study with the purpose of assessing patient radiation dose and stochastic risk (risk for fatal cancer) in a patient population undergoing interventional radiological (IR) procedures. Measurements were performed on 36 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA, n=18), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS, n=3), diagnostic angiography (DA, n=6), arterial embolization (AE, n=3), and hepatic neoplasm chemoembolization (HCE, n=6). Kerma area product (KAP) was used as a measure of x-ray exposure to the patient. Mean KAP value per procedure was 79+/-50 Gy cm for PTA, 139+/-55 Gy cm for TIPS, 110+/-44 Gy cm for DA, 325+/-145 Gy cm for AE, and 150+/-76 Gy cm for HCE. Forty-six percent of total KAP value was attributed to fluoroscopy. In conclusion, we showed that a linear correlation between effective dose and KAP was found (r=0.84), which could be used for estimating patient effective dose using KAP measurements. Small changes to the number of digital frames acquired result in substantial change of the total KAP in interventional radiological procedures. Stochastic risk from IR procedures is quite low for the patient. Measuring KAP is a simple and accurate method, which provides the interventional radiologist with a good estimation of the patient's relative risk for stochastic effects.

Six years experience in intracoronary brachytherapy procedures: patient doses from fluoroscopy

Typical patient dose levels during intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) procedures using beta sources were determined across a sample of 221 treatments. Dose-area product values, fluoroscopy time and number of frames per procedure, with median values of 62 Gy cm2, 17.0 min and 1493 images, respectively, resulted in a 20% to 50% increase in the values measured for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures in the same medical centre (median values 41 Gy cm2, 14.3 min and 1078 images). Likely reasons for this increase include the additional complexity of ICB, the need for recording and reporting every step of the treatment, getting the essential parameters for the volume determination of the lesion and therapeutic radiation dose calculation and, finally, the learning curve for this kind of procedure. A high concentration skin dose distribution during ICB procedures was measured and in 12% of the patients peak skin doses higher than 1.5 Gy were confirmed. 10 patients were submitted to clinical follow-up and skin injuries were not identified.

Patient-Specific Dose and Radiation Risk Estimation in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization

Background— Because of the higher radiosensitivity of infants and children compared with adults, there is a need to evaluate the doses delivered to pediatric patients who undergo interventional cardiac procedures. However, knowledge of the effective dose in pediatric interventional cardiology is very limited.

Methods and Results— For an accurate risk estimation, a patient-specific Monte Carlo simulation of the effective dose was set up in 60 patients with congenital heart disease who underwent diagnostic (n=28) or therapeutic (n=32) cardiac catheterization procedures. The dose-saving effect of using extra copper filtration in the x-ray beam was also investigated. For diagnostic cardiac catheterizations, a median effective dose of 4.6 mSv was found. Therapeutic procedures resulted in a higher median effective dose of 6.0 mSv because of the prolonged use of fluoroscopy. The overall effect of inserting extra copper filtration into the x-ray beam was a total effective dose reduction of 18% with no detrimental effect on image quality. An excellent correlation between the dose-area product and effective patient dose was found ( r =0.95). Hence, dose-area product is suitable for online estimation of the effective dose with good accuracy. With all procedures included, the resulting median lifetime risk for stochastic effects was 0.08%.

Conclusions— Because of the high radiation exposure, it is important to monitor patient dose by dose-area product instrumentation and to use additional beam filtration to keep the effective dose as low as possible in view of the sensitivity of the pediatric patients.

Retrospective evaluation of occurrence of skin injuries in interventional cardiac procedures

Interventional cardiology procedures can involve high doses to patients and, in particular, to patients' skin, the tissue at greatest risk of deterministic injuries. The evaluation of skin dose from interventional procedures is recommended, but difficult because of the amount of different X-ray fields and projections used in a procedure. For this reason, a retrospective follow-up study has been developed to identify skin injuries in patients submitted to one or more cardiac interventions in the Udine hospital between 1998 and 2002. Seventy-eight patients with a cumulative dose-area product >300 Gy cm2 were selected from 3332 patients, who underwent 5039 procedures. In this group the maximum skin dose was 6.7 Gy. The clinical follow-up, performed using the LENT-SOMA methodology, has not detected skin injuries and this result allows a frequency to be estimated for skin injuries in patients undergoing repeated cardiac procedures of <3 x 10(-4) in our centre.

Characteristics of dosemeter types for skin dose measurements in practice

A growing number of papers report deterministic effects in the skin of patients who have undergone interventional radiological procedures. Dose measurements, and especially skin dose measurements, are therefore increasingly important. Methods and acceptable dosemeters are, however, not clearly defined. This paper is the result of a literature overview with regard to assessing the entrance skin dose during radiological examinations by putting a dosemeter on the patient's skin. The relevant intrinsic characteristics, as well as some examples of clinical use of the different detector types, are presented. In this respect, thermoluminescence, scintillation, semiconductor and film dosemeters are discussed and compared with respect to their practical use.

Film dosimetry for fluoroscopic procedures: potential errors

Kodak EDR 2 film was calibrated across the range of beam qualities and exposure rates typically used in our cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Its dose-response curve was successfully modelled up to its saturation point of 1 Gy. The consistency of the film's response with film batch, time between exposure and processing processor and day-to-day variations in performance, was investigated. The effects of field size, exposure rate, beam quality and use of the dynamic wedge filter were quantified. The overall uncertainty in dose was estimated to be between -20% and +40%, at 160 mGy. This uncertainty increases as the film approaches its saturation point. In addition, some unusual artefacts were observed.

Evaluation of methods to estimate the patient dose in interventional radiology

Dosimetric methods used for interventional and diagnostic radiology are reviewed and evaluated, including terms, quantities, equipment, calibration and measurements. Measurement of local skin dose and estimation of maximum local skin dose are emphasised. Aspects related to dosimetry in computed tomography and to methods of determining organ and tissue doses are not considered.

Calibration of Kodak EDR2 film for patient skin dose assessment in cardiac catheterization procedures

Kodak EDR2 film has been calibrated across the range of exposure conditions encountered in our cardiac catheterization laboratory. Its dose-response function has been successfully modelled, up to the saturation point of 1 Gy. The most important factor affecting film sensitivity is the use of beam filtration. Spectral filtration and kVp together account for a variation in dose per optical density of -10% to +25%, at 160 mGy. The use of a dynamic wedge filter may cause doses to be underestimated by up to 6%. The film is relatively insensitive to variations in batch, field size, exposure rate, time to processing and day-to-day fluctuations in processor performance. Overall uncertainty in the calibration is estimated to be -20% to +40%, at 160 mGy. However, the uncertainty increases at higher doses, as the curve saturates. Artefacts were seen on a number of films, due to faults in the light-proofing of the film packets.

Suitability of resin-coated photographic paper for skin dose measurement during fluoroscopically-guided X-ray procedures

The need for mapping skin doses during fluoroscopically-guided X-ray procedures has been described by a number of institutions and experts. Different large photographic or X-ray films placed on the patient's skin have been found to be useful for recording doses up to 1.0-2.0 Gy - depending on the film - and up to 15 Gy using radiochromic films. Though the upper limit of the film sensitivity is seldom exceeded during interventional procedures, the main disadvantage of the X-ray films is still the excessive sensitivity for long, high dose procedures. Radiochromic films show poor definition for doses below 0.5 Gy and are expensive. The goal of the present paper is to analyse the possibilities of using common resin-coated photographic paper for this purpose. Sensitometric curves obtained with different paper types processed in conventional X-ray film automatic processors demonstrate that some of them can be used with better results than X-ray films at a very low cost. Doses from about 10 mGy to near 3.0 Gy can be measured with good accuracy using a variety of glossy photographic papers.

Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose

PURPOSE

To determine peak skin dose (PSD), a measure of the likelihood of radiation-induced skin effects, for a variety of common interventional radiology and interventional neuroradiology procedures, and to identify procedures associated with a PSD greater than 2 Gy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational study was conducted at seven academic medical centers in the United States. Sites prospectively contributed demographic and radiation dose data for subjects undergoing 21 specific procedures in a fluoroscopic suite equipped with built-in dosimetry capability. Comprehensive physics evaluations and periodic consistency checks were performed on each unit to verify the stability and consistency of the dosimeter. Seven of 12 fluoroscopic suites in the study were equipped with skin dose mapping software.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period, skin dose data were recorded for 800 instances of 21 interventional radiology procedures. Wide variation in PSD was observed for different instances of the same procedure. Some instances of each procedure we studied resulted in a PSD greater than 2 Gy, except for nephrostomy, pulmonary angiography, and inferior vena cava filter placement. Some instances of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation, renal/visceral angioplasty, and angiographic diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal hemorrhage produced PSDs greater than 3 Gy. Some instances of hepatic chemoembolization, other tumor embolization, and neuroembolization procedures in the head and spine produced PSDs greater than 5 Gy. In a subset of 709 instances of higher-dose procedures, there was good overall correlation between PSD and cumulative dose (r = 0.86; P <.000001) and between PSD and dose-area-product (r = 0.85, P <.000001), but there was wide variation in these relationships for individual instances.

CONCLUSIONS

There are substantial variations in PSD among instances of the same procedure and among different procedure types. Most of the procedures observed may produce a PSD sufficient to cause deterministic effects in skin. It is suggested that dose data be recorded routinely for TIPS creation, angioplasty in the abdomen or pelvis, all embolization procedures, and especially for head and spine embolization procedures. Measurement or estimation of PSD is the best method for determining the likelihood of radiation-induced skin effects. Skin dose mapping is preferable to a single-point measurement of PSD.

Short communication: Practical aspects for the evaluation of skin doses in interventional cardiology using a new slow film

Mapping skin doses in complex fluoroscopy interventions is useful to determine the probability of a possible injury, to detect areas of overlapping irradiation fields and to obtain a permanent register of the most exposed patient skin areas. To fulfil this task, large films with slow X-ray response can be used. Recently, Kodak has introduced a new radiotherapy verification film, named EDR2 (Extended Dose Range). The aim of this paper is to analyse the possibilities of using this new film for estimating skin dose distributions in interventions with potentially higher doses, such as complex percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), intravascular brachytherapy procedures (IVB) or cardiac ablations. The EDR2 film by Kodak is an improved option to be used in interventional cardiology to obtain maps of patient skin doses and to estimate maximum skin doses up to 1400 mGy. Film kVp dependence is negligible and the processor conditions can be standardized to obtain skin dose estimations. The linear range for accurate dose measurements is from 50 mGy to 500 mGy.

Skin dose and dose-area product values in patients undergoing intracoronary brachytherapy

Entrance skin doses, dose-area product (DAP) values, fluoroscopy times and digital cine acquisition data were measured for 86 patients undergoing intracoronary brachytherapy procedures with beta sources, to estimate risk of skin injuries. Interventions were carried out in three dedicated X-ray interventional cardiology rooms equipped with X-ray systems operating in pulsed modes, with high filtration and edge filter options. Skin dose distribution was analysed in detail in 56 patients using slow films and thermoluminescent dosimetry. Digital recording of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine cine images also allowed analysis of the technical parameters used throughout the procedures. A protocol for clinical follow-up of these patients at the cardiology service is also presented, which prescribes special attention when a threshold dose is reached. Median values for DAP, fluoroscopy time and number of frames were 81.2 Gy cm(2), 17.5 min and 1569 frames, respectively, and maximum values were 323.3 Gy cm(2), 46.2 min and 3213 frames, respectively. In two cases, maximum skin doses in a procedure reached 3.5 Gy and 4.6 Gy. Comparing median values in this study, intracoronary brachytherapy involved approximately two-fold the DAP used in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures performed during the same period in the same catheterization laboratories, as a consequence of the need to monitor the radioactive source location used for the treatment of stenoses and the intravascular ultrasound. Special care must be paid in those cases of high dose in relation to potential patient skin injuries and late effects.

Radiation injuries after fluoroscopic procedures

Fluoroscopically guided diagnostic and interventional procedures have become much more commonplace over the last decade. Current fluoroscopes are easily capable of producing dose rates in the range of 0.2 Gy (20 rads) per minute. The dose rate often changes dramatically with patient positioning and size. Most machines currently in use have no method to display approximate patient dose other than the rough surrogate of total fluoroscopy time. This does not include patient dose incurred during fluorography (serial imaging or cine runs), which can be considerably greater than dose during fluoroscopy. There have been over 100 cases of documented radiation skin and underlying tissue injury, a large portion of which resulted in dermal necrosis. The true number of injuries is undoubtedly much higher. The highest dose procedures are complex interventions such as those involving percutaneous angioplasties, stent placements, embolizations, and TIPS. In some cases skin doses have been in excess of 60 Gy (6000 rads). In many instances the procedures have been performed by physicians with little training in radiation effects, little appreciation of the radiation injuries that are possible or the strategies that could have been used to reduce both patient and staff doses. Almost all of the severe injuries that have occurred were avoidable.

X-ray dose and associated risks from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures

The objectives of this study were to quantify the ionizing radiation exposure to patient and operator during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation and to estimate the risks associated with this exposure. The study consisted of 50 RF ablation procedures, all performed in the same electrophysiology laboratory. Occupational dose to two cardiologists who performed the procedures was measured using film badges and extremity thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). Absorbed dose to the patients' skin was measured using TLDs. Dose-area product (DAP) was also measured. The effective dose to the cardiologists was less than 0.15 mSv per month. The mean equivalent dose to the cardiologists' left hand and forehead was 0.24 mSv and 0.05 mSv, respectively, per RF ablation procedure, which was more than twice the mean dose for the other cardiology procedures carried out in the centre. Yearly occupational dose to the cardiologists was much lower than the relevant statutory dose limits. The mean skin dose, fluoroscopy time and DAP to patients were 0.81 Gy, 67 min and 123 Gycm(2), respectively, with a maximum of 3.2 Gy, 164 minutes and 430 Gycm(2), respectively. Mean effective dose to patients was 17 mSv, from which the excess risk of developing fatal cancer is 0.1%. Six of the patients (12%) received a skin dose above the threshold dose for radiation skin injury (2 Gy), but no skin injuries were reported. Patient skin dose and DAP were closely correlated and this allows DAP to be used to monitor patient skin dose in real-time. DAP levels were locally adopted as diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) that provide an indication during a procedure that a patient is at risk of suffering deterministic skin injury.

Skin radiation injuries in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures

This study investigates the incidence of skin injuries and retrospectively estimates skin doses in a sample of patients who had multiple coronary angiographies and who underwent more than four percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs), performed primarily by the same team of cardiologists in a university hospital. A database of 7824 PTCAs performed during the last 14 years was analysed. Patients were selected and reviewed by a cardiologist and two radiotherapists with experience in radiation-induced skin injuries. A retrospective analysis of skin doses was performed using data from the patients' files and from the quality assurance (QA) programme of the hospital, which includes periodic patient dose measurements. 14 patients were included in the study. Each patient had undergone between 4 and 14 coronary angiographies and between 5 and 10 PTCAs, performed over a period of 2-10 years. The estimated mean dose-area product per procedure was 46 Gy cm(2) for coronary angiography and 82 Gy cm(2) for PTCA. Mean values of maximum skin dose per procedure were 217 mGy for the diagnostic studies and 391 mGy for the PTCAs. Only a slight radiation skin injury was clinically demonstrated in one patient with a history of 10 coronary angiographies and 10 PTCAs (estimated maximum skin dose 9.5 Gy). Another patient who underwent 14 coronary angiographies and 10 PTCAs (estimated maximum skin dose 7.3 Gy) showed a slight telangiectasia and discrete pigmentation. Another patient with a cutaneous lupus erythematosus showed pigmentation in the area of the radiation field following seven coronary angiographies and six PTCAs (estimated maximum skin dose 5.6 Gy), as expected bearing in mind that skin tolerance to high doses may be altered for patients with this pathology. Each of the remaining 11 patients with no skin injuries had undergone between 5 and 7 PTCAs and between 5 and 14 additional angiographies. None of the 14 patients reported acute skin injuries and no necrosis or radiodermatitis was observed.

Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures

Coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures performed in four different facilities were monitored in the present study by measuring maximum skin dose, dose-area product and other operational parameters. Radiographic slow film, thermoluminescent dosemeters and transmission ion chambers were used to measure dose related quantities. Values of 107-711 mGy for maximum skin dose and 27.3-370.6 Gy cm2 for dose-area product were found, together with cumulative skin dose estimates of 110-3706 mGy. A discussion of the relationship of measured dose-area product and skin dose values is made using a field concentration factor defined as a way to interpret the findings. No general correlation was observed between dose-area product and maximum skin dose. Cumulative skin dose estimates throughout a procedure should be discarded as a realistic method for assessing deterministic risk in cardiology procedures. Slow film in addition to thermoluminescent dosemeters for measurement of maximum skin dose is a good alternative, especially for complex interventional procedures. For repeated procedures, combining film and dose-area product monitoring favours optimization of radiation protection for the patient.

Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product

The use of X-rays in cardiac interventional radiology has the potential to induce deterministic radiation effects on the patient's skin. Guidelines published by official organizations encourage the recording of information to evaluate this risk, and the use of reference values in terms of the dose-area product (DAP). Skin dose measurements were made with thermoluminescent dosemeters placed at eight different locations on the body. In addition, DAP was recorded in 100 patients for four types of interventional radiology procedures. Mean, median and third quartile for these results are presented. Maximum skin dose values found were 412 mGy, 725 mGy, 760 mGy and 1800 mGy for coronary catheterization, coronary catheterization with left ventricle investigation, and percutaneous transluminal angiography without and with stenting, respectively. Median DAPs for these same procedures were, respectively, 5682 cGy cm2, 10,632 cGy cm2, 10,880 cGy cm2 and 13,161 cGy cm2. The relationship between DAP and skin dose was investigated. We found a poor correlation of DAP with maximum skin dose (r = 0.77) and skin dose indicator (r = 0.78). Using conversion factors derived from Monte Carlo simulations, skin dose distributions were calculated based on the measured DAPs. Agreement between the calculated skin dose distribution, using DAP values averaged over a group of patients who underwent coronary catheterization and left ventricle investigation, and the measured skin dose averaged over the same group of patients was very good. However, there were large differences between the calculated skin doses using the individual DAP data per patient and measured skin doses for individual patients (r = 0.66). Hence, calculation of individual skin doses based on the specific DAP data per patient is not reliable and therefore measuring skin dose is preferable.

Entrance skin dose estimates derived from dose-area product measurements in interventional radiological procedures

Patient skin doses resulting from interventional radiological procedures have the potential to exceed threshold doses for deterministic effects such as erythema and epilation. If the irradiation geometry is known, the entrance skin dose can be estimated from the measured dose-area product. For each of 10 non-coronary interventional procedures, a nominal geometry was identified. From a previous survey of patient dose-area products, the entrance skin doses were estimated under the assumption that all procedures were performed with the nominal geometry specific to it. An analysis of the uncertainties in these doses caused by realistic deviations from the nominal geometry was also performed and it was shown that the estimated entrance skin dose values are at least to within 40%, and generally to within about 30%, of those actually received. For example, the median estimated entrance skin doses for the posteroanterior and lateral projections of cerebral angiography were 100 and 110 mGy. respectively, and for hepatic angiography 425 mGy. The largest entrance skin dose estimate for a single projection was for the angiography component of a CT arterial portography procedure at 670 mGy. Comparisons between entrance skin dose estimates obtained from this study are made with data from other interventional radiology patient dose surveys.

Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology

The aim of this work has been to determine typical occupational dose levels in interventional radiology and cardiology installations and to relate doses to patient and occupational dosimetry through the dose-area product. An experimental correlation between environmental dosimetric records and dose-area products in the centres studied was established. The study covered a sample of 83 procedures performed by 10 specialists in six laboratories. The radiologists and cardiologists monitored wore nine thermoluminescent chips next to eyes, forehead, neck, hands, left shoulder, left forearm and left arm during each single procedure. In addition, direct reading electronic devices for environmental dosimetry were placed in the C-arm of the X-ray system, to estimate roughly the occupational radiation risk level. Typical shoulder doses derived from electronic dosimetry range between 300 and 500 muSv per procedure, assuming no lead protective screens were used. Using these values and patient dose-area data from two laboratories, averaged ratios of 84 and 120 muSv per 1000 cGy cm2 are obtained for cardiology procedures. Finally, occupational dose reductions of approximately 20% when using highly filtered X-ray beams with automatic tube potential (kV) reduction (available in some facilities), and by a factor of about three when using ceiling mounted screens, have been found.

Dosimetric and radiation protection considerations based on some cases of patient skin injuries in interventional cardiology

Recently, several cases of skin injuries have been detected in patients undergoing cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation. These procedures were performed on a biplane X-ray system used in a large Spanish hospital for interventional cardiology procedures. Interventional procedures performed and radiation lesions produced on patients are described. The radiation lesions were mainly erythematous lesions and chronic radiodermatitis. Results of the dosimetric evaluations and an analysis of the operational aspects of radiological protection are discussed. Poor image quality could have influenced the length of the procedures. Dose rate at the image intensifier entrance was within usual reported values in literature. However, the focus-to-skin distance for the horizontal X-ray beam was too short, resulting in a high skin dose rate. Additionally, X-ray beams are of fixed orientation, and accumulated skin dose in the patient's right side has been estimated as 11-15 Gy per procedure. In conclusion, practical radiation protection considerations to avoid further incidents of this sort are proposed, concerning the use of X-ray systems specially designed for interventional radiology, the improvement of cardiologists' training in radiation protection and routine patient dose measurements for complex interventional procedures.

A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures

Patient radiation doses received during interventional radiological procedures can be significant. To aid in the establishment of reference dose levels, a patient dose survey has been conducted of such procedures. A total of 288 non-coronary procedures (177 classified as diagnostic and 111 as therapeutic) were accrued into the study. For each procedure, the fluoroscopy screening time and the fluoroscopic and digital radiographic dose-area products were recorded in a computer database. For example, median dose-area product values (due to fluoroscopy and digital radiography combined) of 24.2, 27.9, 69.6 and 74.7 Gy cm2 were obtained for nephrostomy, biliary stent removal/insertion, cerebral angiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography procedures. While the effective dose is not an accurate measure of patient risk, it is convenient for comparing the radiological risks associated with various procedures. Effective doses were estimated from the total dose-area products. The respective median estimated effective dose values for the four procedures noted above were 3.9, 4.5, 7.0 and 12.0 mSv. While an infrequently performed procedure at this institution (n = 4 during this survey), the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure had the greatest median dose-area product and effective dose values: 347 Gy cm2 and 55.5 mSv, respectively. Excluding the extreme case of TIPS, it was found that among commonly-performed procedures, those that are categorized as therapeutic do not necessarily present a statistically significant greater radiation risk than those which are diagnostic. Comparisons between dose-area product values obtained from this study are made with data from other interventional radiology patient dose surveys and reasons for some differences noted are discussed.