Portal imaging

Assessing setup errors and shifting margins for planning target volume in head, neck, and breast cancer

Accurately calculating setup errors is crucial in ensuring quality assurance for patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the systematic, random, and planning target volume (PTV) margin errors for patients with head and neck cancer (n=48) and breast cancer (n=50). The treatment setup was performed using electronic portal imaging (EPIDs) and irradiated using Elekta linac. The errors were calculated using the van Herk formula. The systematic error for the head and neck was 0.89, 0.43, and 1.49 mm on the x, y, and z-axis, respectively, and 0.39, 0.74, 0.38 for the breast cases. The random error was 0.82, 0.68, 0.94 mm for the head and neck and 0.66, 0.72, 0.79 mm for the breast. The PTV margin shifting error for the head and neck were 2.79, 1.55, and 4.38 mm, while it was 1.43, 2.35, and 1.50 mm for the breast. The setup errors varied according to the tumor location. The study highlights the potential benefits of using EPIDs for reducing uncertainties in setup verification procedures.

Frequency-dependent optimal weighting approach for megavoltage multilayer imagers

Multi-layer imaging (MLI) devices improve the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) while maintaining the spatial resolution of conventional mega-voltage (MV) x-ray detectors for applications in radiotherapy. To date, only MLIs with identical detector layers have been explored. However, it may be possible to instead use different scintillation materials in each layer to improve the final image quality. To this end, we developed and validated a method for optimally combining the individual images from each layer of MLI devices that are built with heterogeneous layers. Two configurations were modeled within the GATE Monte Carlo package by stacking different layers of a terbium doped gadolinium oxysulfide Gd2O2S:Tb (GOS) phosphor and a LKH-5 glass scintillator. Detector response was characterized in terms of the modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and DQE. Spatial frequency-dependent weighting factors were then analytically derived for each layer such that the total DQE of the summed combination image would be maximized across all spatial modes. The final image is obtained as the weighted sum of the sub-images from each layer. Optimal weighting factors that maximize the DQE were found to be the quotient of MTF and NNPS of each layer in the heterogeneous MLI detector. Results validated the improvement of the DQE across the entire frequency domain. For the LKH-5 slab configuration, DQE(0) increases between 2%-3% (absolute), while the corresponding improvement for the LKH-5 pixelated configuration was 7%. The performance of the weighting method was quantitatively evaluated with respect to spatial resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of simulated planar images of phantoms at 2.5 and 6 MV. The line pair phantom acquisition exhibited a twofold increase in CNR and SNR, however MTF was degraded at spatial frequencies greater than 0.2 lp mm^-1. For the Las Vegas phantom, the weighting improved the CNR by around 30% depending on the contrast region while the SNR values are higher by a factor of 2.5. These results indicate that the imaging performance of MLI systems can be enhanced using the proposed frequency-dependent weighting scheme. The CNR and SNR of the weighted combined image are improved across all spatial scales independent of the detector combination or photon beam energy.

Evaluation of PTV margins in IMRT for head and neck cancer and prostate cancer

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to evaluate planning target volume (PTV) margins for two different locations using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to ensure that the correct radiation dose is delivered to the tumour when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods:

Setup data were collected from 40 patients treated with IMRT for head and neck cancer (HN) (20 patients) and prostate cancer (20 patients). Setup errors from 720 registration images were analysed to evaluate systematic and random errors. Thereafter, optimal PTV margins were calculated based on International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 62 (ICRU), Stroom and Parker formulas compared with the Van Herk’s recipe.

Results:

To calculate the margins around the PTV, several different formulas have been used. Setup margins ranged between 2–4·3, 2·2–4·6 and 2·1–4·7 mm in X, Y and Z directions, respectively, for HN cases. Similarly, for the prostate site, setup margins ranged between 3·7–8·3, 3·2–6·8 and 3·3–8·2 mm in X, Y and Z directions.

Conclusion:

To ensure better coverage of target volume, we adopted a PTV margin of 5 mm for HN PTVs and 10 mm for prostate PTVs in our department.

Contrast Enhancement for Portal Imaging in Nanoparticle-Enhanced Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Phantom Evaluation Using Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams

Our team evaluated contrast enhancement for portal imaging using Monte Carlo simulation in nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy. Dependencies of percentage contrast enhancement on flattening-filter (FF) and flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams were determined by varying the nanoparticle material (gold, platinum, iodine, silver, iron oxide), nanoparticle concentration (3–40 mg/mL) and photon beam energy (6 and 10 MV). Phase-space files and energy spectra of the 6 MV FF, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV FF and 10 MV FFF photon beams were generated based on a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. We found that gold and platinum nanoparticles (NP) produced the highest contrast enhancement for portal imaging, compared to other NP with lower atomic numbers. The maximum percentage contrast enhancements for the gold and platinum NP were 18.9% and 18.5% with a concentration equal to 40 mg/mL. The contrast enhancement was also found to increase with the nanoparticle concentration. The maximum rate of increase of contrast enhancement for the gold NP was equal to 0.29%/mg/mL. Using the 6 MV photon beams, the maximum contrast enhancements for the gold NP were 79% (FF) and 78% (FFF) higher than those using the 10 MV beams. For the FFF beams, the maximum contrast enhancements for the gold NP were 53.6% (6 MV) and 53.8% (10 MV) higher than those using the FF beams. It is concluded that contrast enhancement for portal imaging can be increased when a higher atomic number of NP, higher nanoparticle concentration, lower photon beam energy and no flattening filter of photon beam are used in nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy.

Evaluation of administered dose using portal images in craniospinal irradiation of pediatric patients

This study aimed to assess the administered dose based on portal imaging in craniospinal pediatric irradiation by evaluating cases in which portal images did or did not account for the total administered dose. We also intended to calculate the mean increase in total administered dose. Data were collected from General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón; we evaluated the total dose administered, total dose planned, number of portal images per treatment and corresponding monitor units of two different groups: one in which the dose from portal images is deducted from the total administered dose (D), and another in which it was not (N). We used descriptive statistics to analyze the collected data, including the mean and respective standard deviation. We used the Shapiro-Wilk and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests and estimated the linear regression coefficients. Patients in group D received a mean dose of 29.00 ± 10.28 cGy based on the verification portal images, a quantity that was deducted from the planned dose to match the total administered dose. Patients in group N received a mean dose of 41.50 ± 30.53 cGy, which was not deducted from the planned dose, evidencing a mean increase of 41.50 ± 30.55 cGy over the total administered dose. The acquisition of the set-up verification portal images, without their inclusion in the total administered dose, reflects an average increase in total dose for craniospinal irradiation of pediatric patients. Subtraction of the monitor units used to acquire the verification images is recommended.

Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery

As complex treatment techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) entail the modeling of rounded leaf-end transmission in the treatment planning system, it is important to accurately determine the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) value for a precise calculation of dose. The advancements in the application of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in quality assurance (QA) and dosimetry have facilitated the determination of DLG in this study. The DLG measurements were performed using both the ionization chamber (DLG_ion) and EPID (DLG_EPID) for sweeping gap fields of different widths. The DLG_ion values were found to be 1.133 mm and 1.120 mm for perpendicular and parallel orientations of the 0.125 cm³ ionization chamber, while the corresponding DLG_EPID values were 0.843 mm and 0.819 mm, respectively. It was found that the DLG was independent of volume and orientation of the ionization chamber, depth, source to surface distance (SSD), and the rate of dose delivery. Since the patient-specific QA tests showed comparable results between the IMRT plans based on the DLG_EPID and DLG_ion, it is concluded that the EPID can be a suitable alternative in the determination of DLG.

Phase contrast portal imaging using synchrotron radiation

Microbeam radiation therapy is an experimental form of radiation treatment with great potential to improve the treatment of many types of cancer. We applied a synchrotron radiation phase contrast technique to portal imaging to improve targeting accuracy for microbeam radiation therapy in experiments using small animals. An X-ray imaging detector was installed 6.0 m downstream from an object to produce a high-contrast edge enhancement effect in propagation-based phase contrast imaging. Images of a mouse head sample were obtained using therapeutic white synchrotron radiation with a mean beam energy of 130 keV. Compared to conventional portal images, remarkably clear images of bones surrounding the cerebrum were acquired in an air environment for positioning brain lesions with respect to the skull structure without confusion with overlapping surface structures.

Image quality improvements of electronic portal imaging devices by multi-level gain calibration and temperature correction

Amorphous silicon (aSi:H) flat panel detectors are prevalent in radiotherapy for megavoltage imaging tasks. Any clinical and dosimetrical application requires a well-defined dose response of the system to achieve meaningful results. Due to radiation damages, panels deteriorate and the linearity of pixel response to dose as well as the stability with regard to changing operating temperatures get worse with time. Using a single level gain correction can lead to an error of about 23% when irradiating a flood field image with 100 MU min(-1) on an old detector. A multi-level gain (MLG) correction is introduced, emending the nonlinearities and subpanel-related artifacts caused by insufficient radiation hardness of amplifiers in the read-out electronics. With rising temperature, offset values typically increase (up to 300 gray values) while the response at higher dose values per frame remain constant for a majority of pixels. To account for temperature-related image artifacts, two additional temperature correction methods have been developed. MLG in combination with temperature corrections can re-establish the aSi:H image quality to the performance required by reliable medical verification tools. Furthermore, the life span and recalibration intervals of these costly devices can be prolonged decisively.

Feasibility study of patient positioning verification in electron beam radiotherapy with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of verification and documentation in electron beam radiotherapy using the photon contamination detected with an electronic portal imaging device. For investigation of electron beam verification with an EPID, the portal images are acquired irradiating two different tissue equivalent phantoms at different electron energies. Measurements were performed on an Elekta SL 25 linear accelerator with an amorphous-Si electronic portal imaging device (EPID: iViewGT, Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK). As a measure of EPID image quality contrast (CR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are determined. For characterisation of the imaging of the EPID RW3 slabs and a Gammex 467 phantom with different material inserts are used. With increasing electron energy the intensity of photon contamination increases, yielding an increasing signal-to-noise ratio, but images are showing a decreasing contrast. As the signal-to-noise ratio saturates with increasing dose a minimum of 50 MUs is recommended. Even image quality depends on electron energy and diameter of the patient, the acquired results are mostly sufficient to assess the accuracy of beam positioning. In general, the online EPID acquisition has been demonstrated to be an effective electron beam verification and documentation method. The results are showing that this procedure can be recommended to be routinely and reliably done in patient treatment with electron beams.

A quality assurance phantom for electronic portal imaging devices

Electronic portal imaging device (EPID) plays an important role in radiation therapy portal imaging, geometric and dosimetric verification. Consistent image quality and stable radiation response is necessary for proper utilization that requires routine quality assurance (QA). A commercial ‘EPID QC’ phantom weighing 3.8 kg with a dimension of 25×25×4.8 cm3 is used for EPID QA. This device has five essential tools to measure the geometric accuracy, signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), dose linearity, and the low‐ and the high‐contrast resolutions. It is aligned with beam divergence to measure the imaging and geometric parameters in both X and Y directions, and can be used as a baseline check for routine QA. The low‐contrast tool consists of a series of holes with various diameters and depths in an aluminum slab, very similar to the Las Vegas phantom. The high‐resolution contrast tool provides the modulation transfer function (MTF) in both the x‐ and y‐dimensions to measure the focal spot of linear accelerator that is important for imaging and small field dosimetry. The device is tested in different institutions with various amorphous silicon imagers including Elekta, Siemens and Varian units. Images of the QA phantom were acquired at 95.2 cm source‐skin‐distance (SSD) in the range 1–15 MU for a 26×26 cm2 field and phantom surface is set normal to the beam direction when gantry is at 0° and 90°. The epidSoft is a software program provided with the EPID QA phantom for analysis of the data. The preliminary results using the phantom on the tested EPID showed very good low‐contrast resolution and high resolution, and an MTF (0.5) in the range of 0.3–0.4 lp/mm. All imagers also exhibit satisfactory geometric accuracy, dose linearity and SNR, and are independent of MU and spatial orientations. The epidSoft maintains an image analysis record and provides a graph of the temporal variations in imaging parameters. In conclusion, this device is simple to use and provides testing on basic and advanced imaging parameters for daily QA on any imager used in clinical practices.

PACS number: 87.57 C‐, 87.57 N‐

Verification of quality parameters for portal images in radiotherapy

Background

The purpose of the study was to verify different values of quality parameters of portal images in radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

We investigated image qualities of different field verification systems. Four EPIDs (Siemens OptiVue500aSi^®, Siemens BeamView Plus^®, Elekta iView^® and Varian PortalVision™) were investigated with the PTW EPID QC PHANTOM^® and compared with two portal film systems (Kodak X-OMAT^® cassette with Kodak X-OMAT V^® film and Kodak EC-L Lightweight^® cassette with Kodak Portal Localisation ReadyPack^® film).

Results

A comparison of the f50 and f25 values of the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) belonging to each of the systems revealed that the amorphous silicon EPIDs provided a slightly better high contrast resolution than the Kodak Portal Localisation ReadyPack^® film with the EC-L Lightweight^® cassette. The Kodak X-OMAT V^® film gave a poor low contrast resolution: from the existing 27 holes only 9 were detectable.

Conclusions

On the base of physical characteristics, measured in this work, the authors suggest the use of amorphous-silicon EPIDs producing the best image quality. Parameters of the EPIDs with scanning liquid ionisation chamber (SLIC) were very stable. The disadvantage of older versions of EPIDs like SLIC and VEPID is a poor DICOM implementation, and the modulation transfer function (MTF) values (f50 and f25) are less than that of aSi detectors.

Acurácia na reprodutibilidade do posicionamento diário de pacientes submetidos a radioterapia conformada (RT3D) para câncer de próstata

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a reprodutibilidade do posicionamento de pacientes com diagnóstico de câncer de próstata submetidos a radioterapia conformada. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 960 (posições anterior e lateral) filmes radiológicos, de um total de 120 pacientes que receberam radioterapia conformada na próstata com técnica isocêntrica. As imagens foram obtidas em acelerador linear de partículas 6 MV. Aplicou-se protocolo específico para planejamento e tratamento da próstata, com o paciente em posição supina, mãos colocadas sobre o tórax, pés apoiados em suporte apropriado. Diariamente, os pacientes foram posicionados conforme demarcações na pele, coincidentes com os lasers da sala. Os filmes radiológicos foram comparados com as radiografias reconstruídas digitalmente (digitally reconstructed radiography - DRR) em sistema de planejamento computadorizado Eclipse, a partir das tomografias. As radiografias de posicionamento foram realizadas no primeiro dia e após, semanalmente, até o término do tratamento. RESULTADOS: As médias dos deslocamentos observados foram de 1,99 ± 1,25 mm no sentido crânio-caudal, 1,37 ± 0,84 mm no látero-lateral e 1,94 ± 1,10 mm no ântero-posterior. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de protocolos específicos para posicionamento dos pacientes é possível na prática clínica, possibilita reprodutibilidade adequada e rápida correção dos possíveis erros.

Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers

The aim of this study is to present an efficient method to generate imager-specific Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose kernels for amorphous silicon-based electronic portal image device dose prediction and determine the effective backscattering thicknesses for such imagers. EPID field size-dependent responses were measured for five matched Varian accelerators from three institutions with 6 MV beams at the source to detector distance (SDD) of 105 cm. For two imagers, measurements were made with and without the imager mounted on the robotic supporting arm. Monoenergetic energy deposition kernels with 0-2.5 cm of water backscattering thicknesses were simultaneously computed by MC to a high precision. For each imager, the backscattering thickness required to match measured field size responses was determined. The monoenergetic kernel method was validated by comparing measured and predicted field size responses at 150 cm SDD, 10 x 10 cm2 multileaf collimator (MLC) sliding window fields created with 5, 10, 20, and 50 mm gaps, and a head-and-neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) patient field. Field size responses for the five different imagers deviated by up to 1.3%. When imagers were removed from the robotic arms, response deviations were reduced to 0.2%. All imager field size responses were captured by using between 1.0 and 1.6 cm backscatter. The predicted field size responses by the imager-specific kernels matched measurements for all involved imagers with the maximal deviation of 0.34%. The maximal deviation between the predicted and measured field size responses at 150 cm SDD is 0.39%. The maximal deviation between the predicted and measured MLC sliding window fields is 0.39%. For the patient field, gamma analysis yielded that 99.0% of the pixels have gamma < 1 by the 2%, 2 mm criteria with a 3% dose threshold. Tunable imager-specific kernels can be generated rapidly and accurately in a single MC simulation. The resultant kernels are imager position independent and are able to predict fields with varied incident energy spectra and a H&N IMRT patient field. The proposed adaptive EPID dose kernel method provides the necessary infrastructure to build reliable and accurate portal dosimetry systems.

Evaluation of Inter-fractional Setup Shifts for Site-specific Helical Tomotherapy Treatments

This paper proposes to summarize and analyze the daily patient setup shifts based on megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) image registration results for Helical TomoTherapy® (HT) treatment. One hundred and fifty-five consecutive treatment plans for a total of 137 patients delivered by the HT unit through one year were collected in this study. The patient data included pelvis (26%), abdomen (23%), lung (21%), head and neck (10%), prostate (8%), and others (12%). All the translational and roll rotational shifts made via auto MVCT and kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) image registration were recorded at each fraction. Manual fine-tuning was followed if automatic registration result was not satisfactory. The mean shift ± one standard deviation (1 SD) was calculated for each patient based on the entire treatment course. For each treatment site, the average shift was analyzed as well as displacement in 3D vector. Statistical tests were performed to analyze the relationship of patient-specific, tumor site-specific, and fraction number association with the patient setup shifts. For all the treatment sites, the largest average shift was found in the anterior-posterior direction. The population standard deviations were between 1.2 and 5.6 mm for the X, Y, and Z directions and ranged from 0.2 to 0.6 degrees for the roll rotational correction. The largest standard deviations of the setup reproducibility in X, Y, and Z directions were found in lung patients (4.2 mm), abdomen, lung and spine patients (4.4 mm), and prostate patients (5.6 mm), respectively. The maximum 3D displacement was 10.9 mm for prostate patients' setup. ANOVA tests demonstrated the setup shifts were statistically different between patients even for those that were treated at the same tumor site in the translational directions. No strong correlation between the setup and the fraction number was found. In conclusion, the MVCT guided function in the HT treatment enables us to generate relatively accurate daily setup through registration with KVCT data sets. Our results indicate that lung, prostate, and abdominal patients are more prone to setup uncertainty and should be carefully evaluated.

Early clinical experience with kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy for interfraction motion management

Interest in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) reflects the desire to minimize interfraction positioning variability. Using a kilovoltage (kV) imaging unit mounted to a traditional LINAC allows daily matching of kV images to planning digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). We quantify and evaluate the significance of calculated deviation from the intended isocenter. Since September 2004, 117 patients with various malignancies were treated using the On-Board Imaging (OBI) system, with 2088 treatment sessions. Patients were positioned by the treating therapist; orthogonal images were then obtained with the OBI unit. Couch shifts were made, aligning bony anatomy to the initial simulation image. Routine port films were performed weekly (after that day's OBI session). Ninety percent of all lateral, longitudinal, and vertical shifts were less than 0.8 cm, 0.6 cm, and 0.7 cm, respectively. The median vector shift for each anatomic site was: 0.42 cm for head and neck, 0.40 cm for CNS, 0.59 cm for GU/prostate, and 0.73 cm for breast; shift magnitude did not change with successive OBI sessions. The use of OBI effectively corrects setup variability. These shifts are typically small and random. The use of OBI likely can replace weekly port films for isocenter verification; however, OBI does not provide field shape verification.

An experimental study on using a diagnostic computed radiography system as a quality assurance tool in radiotherapy

The advent of improved digital imaging modalities in diagnostic and therapy is fast making conventional films a nonexistent entity. However, several radiotherapy centers still persist with film for performing quality assurance (QA) tests. This paper investigates the feasibility of using a diagnostic computed radiography (CR) system as a QA tool in radiotherapy. QA tests such as light field congruence, field size verification, determination of radiation isocentre size, multileaf collimator (MLC) check and determination of isocentric shift for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were performed and compared with film. The maximum variation observed between CR and film was 0.4 mm for field size verification, -0.13 mm for the radiation isocentre size check, 0.77 for MLC check and -0.1 mm for isocentric shift using the Winston Lutz test tool for SRS QA. From these results obtained with the CR it is concluded that a diagnostic CR system can be an excellent cost-effective digital alternative to therapy film as a tool for QA in radiotherapy.

A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been the preferred tools for verification of patient positioning for radiotherapy in recent decades. Since EPID images contain dose information, many groups have investigated their use for radiotherapy dose measurement. With the introduction of the amorphous-silicon EPIDs, the interest in EPID dosimetry has been accelerated because of the favourable characteristics such as fast image acquisition, high resolution, digital format, and potential for in vivo measurements and 3D dose verification. As a result, the number of publications dealing with EPID dosimetry has increased considerably over the past approximately 15 years. The purpose of this paper was to review the information provided in these publications. Information available in the literature included dosimetric characteristics and calibration procedures of various types of EPIDs, strategies to use EPIDs for dose verification, clinical approaches to EPID dosimetry, ranging from point dose to full 3D dose distribution verification, and current clinical experience. Quality control of a linear accelerator, pre-treatment dose verification and in vivo dosimetry using EPIDs are now routinely used in a growing number of clinics. The use of EPIDs for dosimetry purposes has matured and is now a reliable and accurate dose verification method that can be used in a large number of situations. Methods to integrate 3D in vivo dosimetry and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) procedures, such as the use of kV or MV cone-beam CT, are under development. It has been shown that EPID dosimetry can play an integral role in the total chain of verification procedures that are implemented in a radiotherapy department. It provides a safety net for simple to advanced treatments, as well as a full account of the dose delivered. Despite these favourable characteristics and the vast range of publications on the subject, there is still a lack of commercially available solutions for EPID dosimetry. As strategies evolve and commercial products become available, EPID dosimetry has the potential to become an accurate and efficient means of large-scale patient-specific IMRT dose verification for any radiotherapy department.

Anatomical imaging for radiotherapy

The goal of radiation therapy is to achieve maximal therapeutic benefit expressed in terms of a high probability of local control of disease with minimal side effects. Physically this often equates to the delivery of a high dose of radiation to the tumour or target region whilst maintaining an acceptably low dose to other tissues, particularly those adjacent to the target. Techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiosurgery and computer planned brachytherapy provide the means to calculate the radiation dose delivery to achieve the desired dose distribution. Imaging is an essential tool in all state of the art planning and delivery techniques: (i) to enable planning of the desired treatment, (ii) to verify the treatment is delivered as planned and (iii) to follow-up treatment outcome to monitor that the treatment has had the desired effect. Clinical imaging techniques can be loosely classified into anatomic methods which measure the basic physical characteristics of tissue such as their density and biological imaging techniques which measure functional characteristics such as metabolism. In this review we consider anatomical imaging techniques. Biological imaging is considered in another article. Anatomical imaging is generally used for goals (i) and (ii) above. Computed tomography (CT) has been the mainstay of anatomical treatment planning for many years, enabling some delineation of soft tissue as well as radiation attenuation estimation for dose prediction. Magnetic resonance imaging is fast becoming widespread alongside CT, enabling superior soft-tissue visualization. Traditionally scanning for treatment planning has relied on the use of a single snapshot scan. Recent years have seen the development of techniques such as 4D CT and adaptive radiotherapy (ART). In 4D CT raw data are encoded with phase information and reconstructed to yield a set of scans detailing motion through the breathing, or cardiac, cycle. In ART a set of scans is taken on different days. Both allow planning to account for variability intrinsic to the patient. Treatment verification has been carried out using a variety of technologies including: MV portal imaging, kV portal/fluoroscopy, MVCT, conebeam kVCT, ultrasound and optical surface imaging. The various methods have their pros and cons. The four x-ray methods involve an extra radiation dose to normal tissue. The portal methods may not generally be used to visualize soft tissue, consequently they are often used in conjunction with implanted fiducial markers. The two CT-based methods allow measurement of inter-fraction variation only. Ultrasound allows soft-tissue measurement with zero dose but requires skilled interpretation, and there is evidence of systematic differences between ultrasound and other data sources, perhaps due to the effects of the probe pressure. Optical imaging also involves zero dose but requires good correlation between the target and the external measurement and thus is often used in conjunction with an x-ray method. The use of anatomical imaging in radiotherapy allows treatment uncertainties to be determined. These include errors between the mean position at treatment and that at planning (the systematic error) and the day-to-day variation in treatment set-up (the random error). Positional variations may also be categorized in terms of inter- and intra-fraction errors. Various empirical treatment margin formulae and intervention approaches exist to determine the optimum strategies for treatment in the presence of these known errors. Other methods exist to try to minimize error margins drastically including the currently available breath-hold techniques and the tracking methods which are largely in development. This paper will review anatomical imaging techniques in radiotherapy and how they are used to boost the therapeutic benefit of the treatment.

Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors in conventional head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging device

Background

Set-up errors are an inherent part of radiation treatment process. Coverage of target volume is a direct function of set-up margins, which should be optimized to prevent inadvertent irradiation of adjacent normal tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) set-up errors and propose optimum margins for target volume coverage in head and neck radiotherapy.

Methods

The dataset consisted of 93 pairs of orthogonal simulator and corresponding portal images on which 558 point positions were measured to calculate translational displacement in 25 patients undergoing conventional head and neck radiotherapy with antero-lateral wedge pair technique. Mean displacements, population systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors and 3D vector of displacement was calculated. Set-up margins were calculated using published margin recipes.

Results

The mean displacement in antero-posterior (AP), medio-lateral (ML) and supero-inferior (SI) direction was -0.25 mm (-6.50 to +7.70 mm), -0.48 mm (-5.50 to +7.80 mm) and +0.45 mm (-7.30 to +7.40 mm) respectively. Ninety three percent of the displacements were within 5 mm in all three cardinal directions. Population systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) were 0.96, 0.98 and 1.20 mm and 1.94, 1.97 and 2.48 mm in AP, ML and SI direction respectively. The mean 3D vector of displacement was 3.84 cm. Using van Herk's formula, the clinical target volume to planning target volume margins were 3.76, 3.83 and 4.74 mm in AP, ML and SI direction respectively.

Conclusion

The present study report compares well with published set-up error data relevant to head and neck radiotherapy practice. The set-up margins were <5 mm in all directions. Caution is warranted against adopting generic margin recipes as different margin generating recipes lead to a different probability of target volume coverage.

Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs)

This study was carried out to investigate whether the electronic portal imaging (EPI) acquisition process could be optimized, and as a result tolerance and action levels be set for the PIPSPro QC-3V phantom image quality assessment. The aim of the optimization process was to reduce the dose delivered to the patient while maintaining a clinically acceptable image quality. This is of interest when images are acquired in addition to the planned patient treatment, rather than images being acquired using the treatment field during a patient's treatment. A series of phantoms were used to assess image quality for different acquisition settings relative to the baseline values obtained following acceptance testing. Eight Varian aS500 EPID systems on four matched Varian 600C/D linacs and four matched Varian 2100C/D linacs were compared for consistency of performance and images were acquired at the four main orthogonal gantry angles. Images were acquired using a 6 MV beam operating at 100 MU min(-1) and the low-dose acquisition mode. Doses used in the comparison were measured using a Farmer ionization chamber placed at d(max) in solid water. The results demonstrated that the number of reset frames did not have any influence on the image contrast, but the number of frame averages did. The expected increase in noise with corresponding decrease in contrast was also observed when reducing the number of frame averages. The optimal settings for the low-dose acquisition mode with respect to image quality and dose were found to be one reset frame and three frame averages. All patients at the Northern Ireland Cancer Centre are now imaged using one reset frame and three frame averages in the 6 MV 100 MU min(-1) low-dose acquisition mode. Routine EPID QC contrast tolerance (+/-10) and action (+/-20) levels using the PIPSPro phantom based around expected values of 190 (Varian 600C/D) and 225 (Varian 2100C/D) have been introduced. The dose at dmax from electronic portal imaging has been reduced by approximately 28%, and while the image quality has been reduced, the images produced are still clinically acceptable.

Validation des plans de radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité avec les images portales

The goal of this study was to show the feasibility of step and shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy pre-treatment quality control for patients using the electronic portal imaging device (iViewGT) fitted on a Sli+ linac (Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) instead of radiographic films. Since the beginning of intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments, the dosimetric quality control necessary before treating each new patient has been a time-consuming and therefore costly obligation. In order to fully develop this technique, it seems absolutely essential to reduce the cost of these controls, especially the linac time. Up to now, verification of the relative dosimetry field by field has been achieved by acquiring radiographic films in the isocenter plane and comparing them to the results of the XiO planning system (Computerized Medical Systems, Missouri, USA) using RIT113 v4.1 software (Radiological Imaging Technology, Colorado, USA). A qualitative and quantitative evaluation was realised for every field of every patient. A quick and simple procedure was put into place to be able to make the same verifications using portal images. This new technique is not a modification of the overall methodology of analysis. The results achieved by comparing the measurement with the electronic portal imaging device and the calculation with the treatment planning system were in line with those achieved with the films for all indicators we studied (isodoses, horizontal and vertical dose profiles and gamma index).

Dose optimisation during imaging in radiotherapy

The desire to increase the precision in radiotherapy delivery has led to the development of advanced imaging systems such as amorphous silicon (a-Si)-based electronic portal imaging, and kV and MV cone beam CT. These are used prior to the delivery of radiation to visualise the organ to be treated and to ensure that the patient setup and treatment delivery are accurate. However, little attention has been given to the dose received by adjacent normal tissues during these imaging procedures. Though these doses are very small compared to the dose delivered during radiotherapy, the involvement of normal tissues and the concern that these could increase the probability of stochastic effect, mainly the induction of secondary malignancy, cannot be ignored. This article reviews some work on the doses received during imaging in radiotherapy and the methods to optimise the same.

Developments in electronic portal imaging systems

Verification of geometric accuracy at the time of treatment delivery has always been a necessary part of the radiotherapy process. Since the introduction of conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the consequences of patient positioning errors are more serious. Portal imaging has played a large part in fulfilling the need for improved geometric accuracy. This review examines how portal imaging has progressed through the development and evolution of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). Changes in technology, including the current commercial systems, and how image quality has changed are presented. The clinical usage of EPIDs and the technological innovations being devised for further improvements in image quality and systems are considered.

Image registration and data fusion in radiation therapy

This paper provides an overview of image registration and data fusion techniques used in radiation therapy, and examples of their use. They are used at all stages of the patient management process; for initial diagnosis and staging, during treatment planning and delivery, and after therapy to help monitor the patients' response to treatment. Most treatment planning systems now support some form of interactive or automated image registration and provide tools for mapping information, such as tissue outlines and computed dose from one imaging study to another. To complement this, modern treatment delivery systems offer means for acquiring and registering 2D and 3D image data at the treatment unit to aid patient setup. Techniques for adapting and customizing treatments during the course of therapy using 3D and 4D anatomic and functional imaging data are currently being introduced into the clinic. These techniques require sophisticated image registration and data fusion technology to accumulate properly the delivered dose and to analyse possible physiological and anatomical changes during treatment. Finally, the correlation of radiological changes after therapy with delivered dose also requires the use of image registration and fusion techniques.

Performance optimization of the Varian aS500 EPID system

Today, electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are widely used as a replacement to portal films for patient position verification, but the image quality is not always optimal. The general aim of this study was to optimize the acquisition parameters of an amorphous silicon EPID commercially available for clinical use in radiation therapy with the view to avoid saturation of the system. Special attention was paid to selection of the parameter corresponding to the number of rows acquired between accelerator pulses (NRP) for various beam energies and dose rates. The image acquisition system (IAS2) has been studied, and portal image acquisition was found to be strongly dependent on the accelerator pulse frequency. This frequency is set for each “energy — dose rate” combination of the linear accelerator. For all combinations, the image acquisition parameters were systematically changed to determine their influence on the performances of the Varian aS500 EPID system. New parameters such as the maximum number of rows (MNR) and the number of pulses per frame (NPF) were introduced to explain portal image acquisition theory. Theoretical and experimental values of MNR and NPF were compared, and they were in good agreement. Other results showed that NRP had a major influence on detector saturation and dose per image. A rule of thumb was established to determine the optimum NRP value to be used. This practical application was illustrated by a clinical example in which the saturation of the aSi EPID was avoided by NRP optimization. Moreover, an additional study showed that image quality was relatively insensitive to this parameter.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Oq; 87.59.Jq

On the existence of low-energy photons (<150 keV) in the unflattened x-ray beam from an ordinary radiotherapeutic target in a medical linear accelerator

Low-energy photons (<150 keV) are essential for obtaining high quality x-ray radiographs. These photons are usually produced in the accelerator target, but are effectively absorbed by the flattening filter and, at least partially, by the target itself. Experimental proof is presented for the existence of low-energy photons in the unflattened x-ray beam produced by a 6 MeV electron beam normally incident on the thinner of the two existing ports of the all-Cu radiotherapeutic target of a Clinac 18 (Varian Associates) linear accelerator. A number of one-shot absorption measurements were carried out with 12 foils of Pb absorbers with thicknesses varying from 0.25 to 3 mm in steps of 0.25 mm arranged symmetrically around the central axis on a 7.2 cm radius circumference. A Kodak ECL film-screen-cassette combination was used as a detector in the absorption measurements, in which optical density was measured as a function of the thickness of the Pb absorbers. Two sets of absorption measurements were carried out: the first one with the Clinac 18 6 MV unflattened beam and the second one with the Clinac 600C 6 MV therapeutic counterpart beam. There is a striking difference between the two sets: the optical density versus Pb-absorber thickness curve shows a sharp increase in optical density at small absorber thicknesses in the case of the unflattened 6 MV x-ray beam as compared with a gently sloping dependence in the case of the 6 MV therapeutic beam. A semi-quantitative assessment of the low-energy photon contribution to the whole optical density/contrast is presented. A 0.85 mm thick Pb absorber intercepting the 6 MV unflattened x-ray beam eliminates almost totally the sharp peak in the optical density curve at small Pb-absorber thicknesses. This constitutes additional evidence for the existence of low-energy photons (<150 keV) in the unflattened 6 MV beam from the Cu therapeutic target.

Evaluation of intra- and inter-fraction motion in breast radiotherapy using electronic portal cine imaging

Breast irradiation is one of the most challenging problems in radiotherapy due to the complex shape of the target volume, proximity of radiation sensitive normal structures and breathing motion. It was the aim of the present study to use electronic portal imaging (EPI) during treatment to determine intra- and inter-fraction motion in patients undergoing radiotherapy and to correlate the magnitude of motion with patient specific parameters. EPI cine images were acquired from the medial tangential fields of twenty radiotherapy patients on a minimum of 5 days each over the course of their treatment. The treatments were administered using 10 MV X-rays and dynamic wedges on a Varian Clinac 2100CD linear accelerator. Depending on the incident dose and the angle of the wedge, between 4 and 16 images could be acquired in one session using an EPI device based on liquid ionization chambers (Varian). The border between lung and chest-wall could be easily detected in all images and quantitative measurements were taken for the amount of lung in the field and the distance of the breast tissue from the field edges. Inter-fraction variability was found to be about twice as large as intra-fraction variability. The largest variability was detected in cranio/caudal direction (intra-fraction: 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm; inter-fraction: 2.6 +/- 1.3 mm) while the lung involvement varied by 1.1 +/- 0.2 mm and 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm intra- and inter-fraction, respectively. This indicates that the effect of breathing motion on the amount of radiated lung was not of major concern in the patients studied. Of other patient specific parameters such as body weight, breast separation, field size and location of the target, only increasing age was significantly correlated with larger inter-fraction motion. Acquisition of EPI cine loops proved to be a quick and easy technique to establish the amount of patient movement during breast radiotherapy. The relatively small variability found in the present pilot study justifies considerations for more conformal dose delivery.

The utility of megavoltage computed tomography images from a helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of relatively low-dose megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) images from a clinical helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Cross-sectional kilovolt computed tomography (kVCT) images were obtained for treatment planning purposes on a diagnostic third-generation CT scanner, followed by MVCT images from a helical tomotherapy system in 8 pet dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors. The kVCT and MVCT images were aligned for setup verification purposes, allowing repositioning before treatment delivery.

RESULTS

Tumors are readily visualized on the MVCT images. At a dose of 2-3 cGy, the MVCT images are of sufficient quality for verification of treatment setup, but soft-tissue contrast is inferior to that with conventional kVCT. The MV and kVCT images were successfully aligned. When necessary, patients undergoing helical tomotherapy were repositioned before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Megavoltage CT image quality is sufficient for tumor identification and three-dimensional setup verification in dogs with spontaneous tumors. The MVCT images can be aligned with the planning kVCT to ensure proper patient registration before treatment. Image alignment was successful in these canine patients, despite no skin markings defining patient positioning between the two scans. MVCT images facilitate setup verification, and their tomographic nature offers improvements over conventional portal imaging.

Fast image acquisition and processing on a TV camera-based portal imaging system

The present paper describes the fast acquisition and processing of portal images directly from a TV camera-based portal imaging device (Siemens Beamview Plus). This approach employs not only hard- and software included in the standard package installed by the manufacturer (in particular the frame grabber card and the Matrox Intellicam interpreter software), but also a software tool developed in-house for further processing and analysis of the images. The technical details are presented, including the source code for the Matrox interpreter script that enables the image capturing process. With this method it is possible to obtain raw images directly from the frame grabber card at an acquisition rate of 15 images per second. The original configuration by the manufacturer allows the acquisition of only a few images over the course of a treatment session. The approach has a wide range of applications, such as quality assurance (QA) of the radiation beam, real-time imaging, real-time verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields, and generation of movies of the radiation field (fluoroscopy mode).

Assessment of effective dose from concomitant exposures required in verification of the target volume in radiotherapy

The requirement of the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulation 2000 [IR(ME)R] of justifying all exposures to ionizing radiation includes those from radiotherapy double exposure portal images resulting in exposure to normal tissues outside the treatment volume. Typical effective doses were calculated for a range of common sites using CT data to outline those parts of specific organs subject to concomitant radiation and generate dose-volume histograms. The product of the mean dose and the relative probability of inducing a fatal cancer in specific organs was used to determine a representative total effective dose in mSv per monitor unit for each site. A table of representative effective doses, ranging from 0.32 mSv to 2.56 mSv per monitor unit, was produced, which may be used to monitor cumulative effective doses of individual patients from double exposure portal images, in addition to those received from localization procedures.

Quality assurance measurements of a-si epid performance

The performance stability of a Varian aS500 amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was monitored over an 18-month period using a variety of standard quality assurance (QA) tests. The tests were selected to provide ongoing information about image quality and dose response from the time of EPID acceptance into clinical service. To evaluate imaging performance, we made spatial resolution and contrast measurements using both PortalVision and QC-3V phantoms for 6- and 15-MV photon beams at repetition rates of 100, 300, and 400 MU/min in standard scanning mode. To assess operational stability for dosimetry applications, we measured central axis radiation response and beam pulse variability for the same image acquisition modes. Using the QC-3V phantom, values for the critical frequency of 0.435 +/- 0.005 lp/mm for 6 MV and 0.382 +/- 0.003 lp/mm for 15 MV were obtained. The contrast-to-noise ratio was found to be approximately 20% higher for the lower photon energy. Beam pulse variability remained within the tolerance of 3% set by the manufacturer. The central axis pixel response of the EPID remained constant within +/-1% over a 5-month period for the 6-MV beam, but fell approximately 4% over the same period for the 15-MV beam. The Varian aS500 EPID studied exhibited consistent image quality and a stable radiation response. These characteristics render it suitable for quantitative applications such as clinical dose measurement.

ACCURACY OF POSITIONING THE CERVICAL SPINE FOR RADIATION THERAPY AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO GTV, CTV AND PTV

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a rigid positioning device for repositioning the cervical spine accurately and precisely during conformal radiation therapy of dogs. Fifteen purpose bred research dogs in a radiation therapy study were included. The dogs were positioned using a head holder and a deflatable pillow attached to the treatment table. Port films were reviewed retrospectively, and repositioning precision was recorded by measurements in three orthogonal planes of the head, 2nd cervical vertebra and 1st thoracic spinous process. Mean treatment position was compared to the planning position for a measurement of systematic set-up error. Mean interfraction position variation of the 2nd cervical vertebra was 0.2, 0.1 and 0.2 cm for the ventrodorsal, caudocranial and laterolateral directions respectively, and the average systematic set up error was 0.2, 0.1 and 0.2 cm for the ventrodorsal, caudocranial and laterolateral directions respectively. Knowledge of the magnitude of reposition errors should be included when determining the margins around the tumor.

The effect of the Varian amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device on exit skin dose

Measurements have been made of the increase in exit surface dose resulting from backscattered radiation generated by the Varian amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID). An increase of < or = 14% was demonstrated at both 6 MV and 10 MV, in a manner which suggests that backscatter from the EPID acts to re-establish electronic equilibrium at the exit surface, normally absent in the build-down region. The magnitude of this effect was influenced by field size, measurement depth and exit surface to EPID distance. Assuming typical constraints of portal imaging frequency and geometry, the results suggest that EPID generated backscatter is unlikely to alter the frequency or severity of exit skin reactions. However, the results do suggest that a limit on the minimum separation between the EPID and the exit surface should be set, and that similar investigations should be made for other EPID models.

Procedures for high precision setup verification and correction of lung cancer patients using CT-simulation and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR)

PURPOSE

In a recent study, large systematic setup errors were detected in patients with lung cancer when a conventional simulation procedure was used to define and mark the treatment isocenter. In the present study, we describe a procedure to omit the session at a conventional simulator to remove simulation errors entirely. Isocenter definition and verification was performed at a computed tomography (CT) simulator, and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were used for setup verification and correction at the treatment unit.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A CT simulation protocol was developed, in which radiopaque markers were used to verify the coincidence of the isocenter marked on the patients' skin with the isocenter defined in the planning CT scan. This protocol was evaluated for 20 patients. Subsequently, electronic portal images were acquired at the treatment unit. The three-dimensional setup error was established from a template match of the appropriate anatomy visible in two orthogonal beams with the corresponding anatomy in DRRs. An offline setup correction protocol was applied to reduce systematic setup errors.

RESULTS

For all patients, the skin marks defined the planning CT scan isocenter to within +/- 1.5 mm in each of the three main directions. Random setup errors at the treatment unit were 1.8, 2.0, and 1.9 mm (1 SD) for the lateral (x), the superior-inferior (y), and the anterior-posterior (z) directions, respectively. With the use of the correction protocol, the systematic errors for x, y, and z were 1.5, 1.5, and 1.3 mm (1 SD).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the distributions of treatment setup errors measured against DRRs obtained in our CT simulation were equal to previously obtained distributions measured against simulator films, conventional simulation can be omitted and DRRs are well-suited for setup verification. By adopting our CT simulation procedure, the large systematic simulation setup errors, which remain hidden if a conventional simulation is performed, can be avoided.

The use of electronic portal imaging to verify patient position during intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered by the dynamic MLC technique

PURPOSE

The precise shape of the three-dimensional dose distributions created by intensity-modulated radiotherapy means that the verification of patient position and setup is crucial to the outcome of the treatment. In this paper, we investigate and compare the use of two different image calibration procedures that allow extraction of patient anatomy from measured electronic portal images of intensity-modulated treatment beams.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Electronic portal images of the intensity-modulated treatment beam delivered using the dynamic multileaf collimator technique were acquired. The images were formed by measuring a series of frames or segments throughout the delivery of the beams. The frames were then summed to produce an integrated portal image of the delivered beam. Two different methods for calibrating the integrated image were investigated with the aim of removing the intensity modulations of the beam. The first involved a simple point-by-point division of the integrated image by a single calibration image of the intensity-modulated beam delivered to a homogeneous polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. The second calibration method is known as the quadratic calibration method and required a series of calibration images of the intensity-modulated beam delivered to different thicknesses of homogeneous PMMA blocks. Measurements were made using two different detector systems: a Varian amorphous silicon flat-panel imager and a Theraview camera-based system. The methods were tested first using a contrast phantom before images were acquired of intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment delivered to the prostate and pelvic nodes of cancer patients at the Royal Marsden Hospital.

RESULTS

The results indicate that the calibration methods can be used to remove the intensity modulations of the beam, making it possible to see the outlines of bony anatomy that could be used for patient position verification. This was shown for both posterior and lateral delivered fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Very little difference between the two calibration methods was observed, so the simpler division method, requiring only the single extra calibration measurement and much simpler computation, was the favored method. This new method could provide a complementary tool to existing position verification methods, and it has the advantage that it is completely passive, requiring no further dose to the patient and using only the treatment fields.

A new approach to off-line setup corrections: combining safety with minimum workload

Off-line patient setup correction protocols based on electronic portal images are an effective tool to reduce systematic patient setup errors. Recently, we have introduced the no action level (NAL) protocol which establishes a significant error reduction at a very small workload. However, this protocol did not include an explicit verification of the applied setup corrections. Systematic mistakes in the execution of setup corrections (e.g., a setup correction is always executed in the +X direction whereas a correction in the -X direction was prescribed) may introduce large systematic setup errors (irrespective of the setup protocol) and may seriously impair treatment outcome. We have therefore extended the NAL protocol with a correction verification (COVER) stage, solely aimed at detecting such mistakes. In short, COVER tests the magnitude of the postcorrection setup error in each relevant direction. If these residue errors are below the acceptance threshold T, no more electronic portal images are required and the protocol has finished. If not, the origin of this result should be investigated; if no obvious mistakes are present, the procedure is repeated for one more treatment fraction. If the residue setup errors are confirmed to be larger than T, the entire protocol is restarted. Using both Monte Carlo simulations and analytical calculations, we performed a risk analysis and evaluated the workload for various choices of T. A threshold T = 3 x sigma(r), where sigma(r) is the mean standard deviation of the random setup errors, ensured that (1) COVER introduces only a small additional workload (1.05 measurement per patient, while the absolute minimum is 1.0) and (2) serious correction mistakes are detected with high probability. Even if setup corrections are wrongly applied in each patient (worst case scenario), COVER ensures that the final distribution of systematic errors is not wider than the precorrection distribution of systematic errors; for realistic frequencies of correction mistakes (<< 1 per patient) this distribution becomes much more narrow. The combination of NAL and COVER thus provides a highly efficient as well as safe method to reduce systematic setup errors.