A Comparison of the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures

Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between open, wiltse, and percutaneous approach to traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurological injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Traumatic thoracolumbar fracture fixation without neurological injury can be performed using the traditional open, mini-open Wiltse, and percutaneous approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare perioperative outcomes between these approaches.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant observational comparative studies.

Results

5 randomized trials and 22 comparative cohort studies were included. Compared to the traditional open approach (n=959), the Wiltse approach (n=410) was associated with significantly lower operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of stay (LOS). There was no significant difference between the two in terms of postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Cobb angle. Compared to the percutaneous approach (n=980), the Wiltse approach was associated with shorter operative and fluoroscopy time, as well as significantly improved Cobb and vertebral body angles. The percutaneous approach was associated with improved vertebral body height. There was no significant difference between the two for blood loss, postoperative VAS, or LOS. Compared to the traditional open approach, the percutaneous approach was associated with shorter operative time, lower EBL, shorter LOS and better postoperative VAS and Oswestry Disability Index. There was no difference between the two in postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral angle, or vertebral body height. Overall study heterogeneity was high.

Conclusions

Utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches holds great promise for lowering patient morbidity and optimizing care. A prospective trial is needed to assess outcomes and guide surgical decision making.

Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p < 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.

Comparison of mMO-TLIF via Midline Incision Versus MIS-TLIF via Wiltse Approach in Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Background

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mMO-TLIF) via posterior midline incision for "targeted limited dissection" versus minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) via Wiltse approach in lumbar degenerative diseases.

Methods

A total of 60 consecutive patients in our center from January 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled, including 30 patients who were treated with mMO-TLIF via posterior midline incision and 30 treated with MIS-TLIF through the Wiltse approach. Perioperative parameters were recorded. The questionnaires of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) were conducted before the operation and after the operation (3 days, 1 week, and 2 years). CT and MRI radiological outcomes were evaluated before the operation and at a 2-year follow-up.

Results

There were no significant differences in the general data, gender, age, and BMI between the two groups. All patients were successfully operated without intraoperative complications. There were significant differences between the two groups in the operation time (p < 0.001) and intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.05). There was no difference in ODI and VAS scores between groups pre- and post-operatively, but they were both significantly improved compared to those before the operation (p < 0.01). At a 2-year follow-up, the paraspinal muscle atrophy and fat infiltration were increased comparing to pre-operation, but the difference was also not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In addition, both the two groups' fusion rates were more than 90% at a 2-year follow-up, however, no difference was detected between the two groups.

Conclusion

mMO-TLIF via midline incision for "targeted limited dissection" could achieve similar clinical and radiological outcomes as MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease.

Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: A systematic review

Introduction

The treatment of traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures remains controversial. To date no consensus exists on the correct choice of surgical approach and technique.

Research question

to provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the available different surgical methods and their quantified outcomes.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched between 2001 and 2020 using the term 'spinal fractures'. Inclusion criteria were: adults, ≥10 cases, ≥12 months follow-up, thoracic or lumbar fractures, and surgery <3 weeks of trauma. Studies were categorized per surgical technique: Posterior open (PO), posterior percutaneous (PP), stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (SA), anterior scopic (AS), anterior open (AO), posterior percutaneous and anterior open (PPAO), posterior percutaneous and anterior scopic (PPAS), posterior open and anterior open (POAO) and posterior open and anterior scopic (POAS). The PO group was used as a reference group.

Results

After duplicate removal 6042 articles were identified. A total of 102 articles were Included, in which 137 separate surgical technique cohorts were described: PO (n = 75), PP, (n = 39), SA (n = 12), AO (n = 5), PPAO (n = 1), PPAS (n = 1), POAO (n = 2) and POAS (n = 2).

Discussion and conclusion

For type A3/A4 burst fractures, without severe neurological deficit, posterior percutaneous (PP) technique seems the safest and most feasible option in the past two decades. If needed, PP can be combined with anterior augmentation to prevent secondary kyphosis. Furthermore, posterior open (PO) technique is feasible in almost all types of fractures. Also, this technique can provide for an additional posterior decompression or fusion. Overall, no neurologic deterioration was reported following surgical intervention.

A Comparison of Outcomes between the Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Multi-Segmental Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Multi-segmental thoracolumbar fracture (MSF) generally refers to fractures occurring in two or more segments of the thoracolumbar spine. With the development of minimally invasive concept, there is little research on its application in the field of MSF. The purpose of this study is to compare two minimally invasive surgical techniques and determine which one is more suitable for treating patients with neurologically intact MSF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 49 MSF patients with intact nerves who were admitted from January 2017 to February 2019. Among them, 25 cases underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and 24 cases underwent Wiltse approach pedicle screw fixation (WAPSF). The operation time, number of fixed segments, blood loss, length of incision, postoperative ambulation time, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, facet joint violation (FJV), number of C-arm exposures, as well as pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), local Cobb's angle (LCA), and percentage of anterior vertebral body height (PAVBH) were recorded for both groups. Paired sample t-test was used for intra-group comparison before and after surgery while independent sample t-test was used for inter-group comparison.

RESULTS

The differences in the number of fixed segments, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bed time, accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, VAS, and ODI between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, the operative time and total surgical incision length were significantly shorter in the WAPSF group than in the PPSF group (p < 0.05), and the FJV was significantly higher in the PPSF group than in the WAPSF group (p < 0.05). Also, the PPSF group received more intraoperative fluoroscopy (p < 0.05). The result of LCA and PAVBH in the WAPSF group were significantly better than in the PPSF group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PPSF and WAPSF were found to be safe and effective in the treatment of MSF without neurological deficits through our study. However, considering radiation exposure, FJV, vertebral height restoration, correction of kyphosis, and learning curve, WAPSF may be a better choice for neurologically intact MSF.

Clinical Efficacy and Imaging Observation of Three Surgical Approaches in Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

Objective

To observe the efficacy and imaging of surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures via the paravertebral muscle space approach.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with thoracolumbar fractures receiving surgery in Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. According to different surgical approaches, they were divided into paravertebral approach group, posterior median approach group and minimally invasive percutaneous approach group. They received surgery via the paravertebral muscle space approach, posterior median approach and minimally invasive percutaneous approach, respectively.

Results

Statistically significant differences were found in surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay among the three groups. One year after surgery, the VAS, ADL and JOA scores of the paravertebral approach group and the minimally invasive percutaneous approach group had statistically significant differences from the posterior median approach group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

For the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, the clinical efficacy of the paravertebral muscle space approach is superior to that of the traditional posterior median approach, and the clinical efficacy of the minimally invasive percutaneous approach is similar to that of the posterior median approach. All the three approaches can effectively improve the postoperative function and pain symptoms of patients without increasing the incidence of complications. Compared with the posterior median approach, the surgery via the paravertebral muscle space and minimally invasive percutaneous approaches presents shorter surgical duration, less bleeding and shorter hospital stay, which is more conducive to postoperative recovery of patients.

Comparison of pedicle screw fixation by four different posterior approaches for the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury

Purpose

This study was designed to compare the pedicle screw fixation by four different posterior approaches for the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury.

Methods

A total of 165 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury who received pedicle screw fixation by posterior approaches from February 2017 to August 2018 were enrolled in this study. They were further divided into the following four groups according to different posterior approaches: Open-C group (conventional open approach), Open-W group (Wiltse approach), MIS-F group (percutaneous approach with fluoroscopy guidance), and MIS-O group (percutaneous approach with O-arm navigation). The demographic data, clinical outcomes, and radiologic parameters were evaluated and compared among the four groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in age, gender, fracture segment, and follow-up time. The incision length, blood loss, hospital stay time, and VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores at the early stage of post-operation were the worst in the Open-C group. The MIS-O group showed significantly higher accuracy rate of pedicle position than other groups. The preoperative and postoperative AVH (anterior vertebral height) and VWA (vertebral wedge angle) obtain obvious correction in all patients immediately after and 1 year post-operation. No difference was found among the four groups at the final radiographic follow-up.

Conclusions

The four different posterior approaches are effective in treating type A thoracolumbar fractures in our study. Each approach has its own individual strengths and weaknesses and therefore requires comprehensive consideration prior to use. Proper approaches selection is critical to patients.

TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES BY CLOSED REDUCTION VIA A PERCUTANEOUS SOLID PEDICLE SCREW

Objectives

Investigate the effect of closed reduction and per- cutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 12 cases of single-segment thoracolumbar spine fractures without spinal cord and nerve injury at our department from March 2016 to September 2017. Patients were treated with closed reduction, percutaneous reduction, and internal fixation with solid pedicle screws. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anterior vertebral body height ratio (AVHR), Cobb angle (CA) of sagittal kyphosis, and VAS of back pain were determined and statistically compared.

Results

The average operation time was 147.2 ± 45.6 min, and the average intraoperative bleeding was 67.8 ± 34.2 mL. All fractured vertebrae were completely reduced, their height was restored, and kyphosis was corrected. The average follow-up period was 10.6 ± 2.7 months, with significant improvements seen in the AVHR, CA of sagittal kyphosis, and VAS score (P < 0.01). One case had a broken rod after three months, and another had a postoperative infection. All the patients achieved bony healing.

Conclusion

The treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by closed reduction and internal fixation with a percutaneous solid pedicle screw is simple, effective, and economical. Level of Evidence VI; Therapeutic Study, Case Series .

Accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw placement using the K-wireless minimally invasive spine percutaneous pedicle screw system in Japan: A randomized active controlled study

•

We compared the VIPER PRIME™ (VP) with existing percutaneous pedicle screw systems.

•

Screw-placement accuracy was not inferior using VP compared with previous systems.

•

Use of VP reduced the screw-insertion time and use of fluoroscopy.

•

VP was not associated with any device- or treatment-related adverse events.

•

VP could reduce radiation exposure and provide accurate pedicle screw placement.

Background

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion has recently become a widely used technique worldwide. This randomized active controlled study was conducted to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the K-wireless Minimally Invasive Spine (MIS) Percutaneous Pedicle Screw (PPS) system compared with use of the six pedicle screw systems currently used in our practices with respect to the accuracy of pedicle screw placement.Also to compare the screw-insertion time and number of fluoroscopic observations during screw insertion between the groups.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with degenerative spinal diseases or vertebral fractures were assigned, including 41 patients in the K-wireless MIS PPS system group (K-wireless group) and 39 in the control group (K-wire group).

The accuracy of the screw insertion, screw-insertion time, number of fluoroscopic observations during screw insertion, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the K-wireless group and the K-wire group. The accuracy rate was calculated as the number of screws with no breach divided by the total number of screws.

Results

The accuracy rates of screw insertion were 85.7% and 75.0% in the K-wireless and K-wire groups, respectively, with an intergroup difference of 10.7% (95% confidence interval: 2.3–19.1%). The K-wireless group demonstrated non-inferiority compared with the K-wire group. The mean screw-insertion time was significantly shorter in the K-wireless group (2.62 and 2.97 min in the K-wireless and K-wire groups, respectively; P=0.005). There were also significantly fewer fluoroscopies in the K-wireless group (10.7 and 17.4 in the K-wireless and K-wire groups, respectively; P<0.001). There were no device-related or study treatment-related adverse events in either group.

Conclusions

The accuracy of pedicle screw insertion using the K-wireless MIS PPS system was not inferior to that of existing products. In terms of safety, no product-related or treatment-related adverse events were identified in this study and no new safety concerns were noted.

The Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between the mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation (MWPSF) and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials and retrospective comparative studies assessing these important indexes of the 2 methods using Review Manager, version 5.4. The clinical outcomes are presented as the risk difference for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference for continuous outcomes with the 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the χ² test and I² statistics. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42021290078).

RESULTS

Two randomized controlled trials and six retrospective cohort studies were included in the present analysis. The percutaneous approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss compared with the mini-open Wiltse approach. No significant differences were found in the total length of the incisions, hospitalization time, postoperative visual analog scale scores, postoperative Oswestry disability index, postoperative Cobb angle, postoperative Cobb angle correction, postoperative Cobb angle correction loss, accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, and postoperative complications between MWPSF and PPSF. However, the incidence of facet joint violation was significantly higher in the PPSF group. In addition, MWPSF was associated with a shorter operative time, shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time, lower hospitalization costs, better postoperative vertebral body angle and percentage of vertebral body height compared with PPSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MWPSF and PPSF are safe and effective treatments of neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Nevertheless, our results have indicated that MWPSF might be the better choice, because it has a shorter learning curve and decreased facet joint violation, operative time, hospitalization costs, and radiation exposure. In addition, MWPSF was associated with better improvement of the postoperative vertebral body angle and percentage of vertebral body height.

Comparison of the Wiltse Approach and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Under O-arm Navigation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the Wiltse approach and percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O‐arm navigation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.

Methods

We enrolled a total of 54 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar fracture who received minimally invasive treatments between October 2014 and October 2018 in this retrospective study. Among these, 28 patients (22 males and six females, with a mean age of 48.6 ± 9.6 years) were treated with pedicle screw fixation through the Wiltse approach (WPSF), and another 26 (15 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 10.6 years) received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under O‐arm navigation (OPSF). Statistical methods were used to perform a detailed comparison of clinical outcomes, radiologic findings, and complications between the two groups obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow‐up.

Results

All patients underwent surgery successfully and finished a follow‐up of more than 12 months. No serious complications, such as infection, blood vessel injury, or spinal cord or nerve root injury occurred. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), and R value were notably improved after surgery, though there was no clear discrepancy between the groups at each time point (P > 0.05). During the follow‐up period, no patients developed neurological impairment or implant‐related complications, and no patients underwent revision surgery. The WPSF group had a significantly shorter operation time than the OPSF group (68.1 ± 9.8 vs 76.1 ± 9.0 minutes, P = 0.005). Moreover, the WPSF group showed less cost of surgery than the WPSF group (48142.1 ± 1430.1 vs 59035.4 ± 1152.7 CNY, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the intraoperative bleeding, length of incision, or postoperative hospitalization time (P > 0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was 95.2% (160/168) in the WPSF group and 96.8% (151/156) in the OPSF group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.432).

Conclusion

Both WPSF and OPSF were safe and effective for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Although the two groups showed favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes through to final follow‐up, we recommended the minimally invasive WPSF given its shorter operation time and lower cost of surgery.

A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of conventional open pedicle screw fixation (COPSF), percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and paraspinal posterior open approach pedicle screw fixation (POPSF) for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who were posteriorly stabilized without graft fusion. Among them, 36 patients underwent COPSF, 38 patients underwent PPSF, and 34 patients underwent POPSF. The clinical outcomes, relative operation indexes, and radiological findings were assessed and compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

All of the patients were followed up for a mean time of 20 months. The PPSF group and POPSF group had shorter operation times, lower amounts of intraoperative blood loss, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the COPSF group (P < 0.05). The radiation times and hospitalization costs were highest in the PPSF group (P < 0.05). Every group exhibited significant improvements in the Cobb angle (CA) and the vertebral body angle (VBA) correction (all P < 0.05). The COPSF group and the POPSF group had better improvements than the PPSF group at 3 days postoperation and the POPSF group had the best improvements in the last follow-up (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both PPSF and POPSF achieved similar effects as COPSF while also resulting in lower incidences of injury. PPSF is more advantageous in the early rehabilitation time period, compared with COPSF, but POPSF is a better option when considering the long-term effects, the costs of treatment, and the radiation times.

The efficacy and safety of multiple-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing perioperative blood loss in patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) for single-segment thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurologic injury underwent pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 264 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurologic injury underwent pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach (January 2016-June 2019) at a single center. The cohort was separated into three groups. Group A received 20 mg/kg TXA at 5 min before skin incision and 16 h after first dose; Group B received 20 mg/kg TXA at 5 min before skin incision; Group C received NS at each same time point. The outcomes were evaluated by hidden blood loss (HBL), total blood loss (TBL), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), transfusion rate, maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, prethrombotic state molecular markers, liver and renal function, coagulation function, inflammatory factor and adverse events.

RESULTS

The HBL, TBL and maximum Hb drop were significantly lower in Group A than those of Group B and Group C, while the difference between Group B and Group C was statistically significant. The IBL was significantly lower in Group A and Group B than that of Group C. However, there was no significantly difference among the three groups in live and renal function, coagulation function, prethrombotic state molecular markers, transfusion rate and complications during the perioperative period. There was significantly lower level of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in Group A than Group C at the day after surgery, and lower level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at the third day after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous TXA used in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture underwent pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach is effective and safe in decreasing perioperative blood loss. The two-dose TXA regimen can further reduce blood loss and alleviate post-operative inflammation response, without affecting prethrombotic state molecular marks and without increasing the risk of complications.

Comparison of the modified Wiltse's approach with spinal minimally invasive system and traditional approach for the therapy of thoracolumbar fracture

Thoracolumbar fractures are usually treated by open posterior pedicle screw fixation. However, this procedure involves massive paraspinal muscle stripping, inflicting surgical trauma, and prolonged X-ray exposure. In this study, we observed 127 patients with single-segment injury thoracolumbar fractures. Thirty-six patients were treated by the modified Wiltse's paraspinal approach with minimally invasive channel system, while 91 patients were treated via traditional posterior approach. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, screw placement accuracy, visual analogue scale score, and Cobb's angle of two groups were compared. The X-ray exposure times were notably reduced (4.2±1.6) in the new approach group (P<0.05). The pedicle screw placement accuracy and Cobb's angle after surgery were similar in the two groups. We conclude that modified Wiltse's paraspinal approach with spinal minimally invasive channel system surgery can significantly reduce the X-ray exposure times and is an alternative therapy for the thoracolumbar fracture.