Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Clear Cell Sarcoma: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

Metastatic clear cell sarcoma of the pancreas: An overview

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma that accounts for less than 1% of all cases and was originally reported in 1965. The incidence of CCS is estimated to be approximately 0.014/100000 depending on the surveillance, epidemiology and end results databases. CCS is a highly invasive type that mainly metastasizes to the lungs, followed by the bones and brain; however, pancreatic metastasis is relatively rare. It has a high probability of recurrence or metastasis and has a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate. Finally, even after recovery, it is fundamental to keep regular postoperative follow-up for CCS patients.

Clear cell sarcoma in Japan: an analysis of the population-based cancer registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Clear cell sarcoma is rare, so no reports have previously characterized its national profiles. We examined the nationwide epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with clear cell sarcoma based on the National Cancer Registry in Japan.

METHODS

Overall, 23 522 patients with soft tissue sarcoma-entered in the National Cancer Registry in 2016-2019 using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition cancer topography and morphology codes-were enrolled in either the clear cell or the non-clear cell sarcoma group. Data extracted included: demographics (sex and age), tumor details (reason for diagnosis, tumor location, histology and stage), hospital volume and facility type, treatment and prognosis for each patient.

RESULTS

Of 23 522 soft tissue sarcoma patients, 122 were enrolled in the clear cell sarcoma group and 23 400 in the non-clear cell sarcoma group. The incidence of clear cell sarcoma was 0.52% of all soft tissue sarcoma, with an age-adjusted incidence of 0.024/100 000/year. The age at diagnosis was significantly younger, and more tumors were at the localized stage in the clear cell than the non-clear cell sarcoma group. In addition, the overall survival in the clear cell group was worse than in the non-clear cell group (P < 0.001). Of 122 patients with clear cell sarcoma, the localized stage, surgical treatment and treatment without chemotherapy were associated with better overall survival in the univariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to have clarified the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, prognosis and significant factors affecting the prognosis of patients with clear cell sarcoma in Japan.

Intestinal Clear Cell Sarcoma-A Case Presentation of an Extremely Rare Tumor and Literature Review

Background: Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an extremely rare form of sarcoma representing less than 1% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. It has morphological, structural, and immunohistochemical similarities to malignant melanoma, affecting young adults and equally affecting both sexes, and is usually located in the tendinous sheaths and aponeuroses of the limbs. Gastrointestinal localization is exceptional, with less than 100 cases reported thus far. The gene fusion of activating transcription factor 1 (ATF1) and the Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) are pathognomonic for clear cell sarcoma, representing the key to the diagnosis. CCS is an extremely aggressive tumor, with >30% having distant or lymphatic metastasis at the time of diagnostic, and it has a high recurrence rate of over 80% in the first year after diagnosis and a high tendency for metastatic dissemination. Given the rarity of this tumor, there is no standardized treatment. Early diagnosis and radical surgery are essential in the treatment of CCS both for the primary tumor and for recurrence or metastasis. Chemo-radiotherapy has very little effect and is rarely indicated, and the role of targeted therapies is still under investigation. Case presentation: We present an extremely rare case of intestinal CSS in a 44-year-old Caucasian female. The patient, asymptomatic, first presented for a routine checkup and was diagnosed with mild iron-deficiency anemia. Given her family history of multiple digestive cancers, additional investigations were requested (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, tumoral markers and imaging) and the results were all within normal limits. In the subsequent period, the patient experienced mild diffuse recurrent abdominal pain, which occurred every 2-3 months. Two years later, the patient presented with symptoms of intestinal obstruction and underwent an emergency laparotomy followed by segmental enterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy for stenotic tumor of the jejunum. Histology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic testing established the diagnosis of CCS. No adjuvant therapy was indicated. Initially, no signs of recurrence or metastasis were detected, but after 30 and 46 months, respectively, from the primary treatment, the patient developed liver metastasis and pericolic peritoneal implants treated by atypical hepatic resections and right hemicolectomy. The patient remains under observation.

Metastatic clear cell sarcoma of the pancreas: A rare case report

BACKGROUND

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma. The most common metastatic sites for CCS are the lungs, bones and brain. CCS is highly invasive and mainly metastasizes to the lung, followed by the bone and brain; however, pancreatic metastasis is relatively rare.

CASE SUMMARY

We report on a rare case of CCS with pancreatic metastasis in a 47-year-old man. The patient had a relevant medical history 3 years ago, with abdominal pain as the main clinical manifestation. No abnormalities were observed on physical examination and the tumor was found on abdominal computed tomography. Based on the medical history and postoperative pathology, the patient was diagnosed with CCS with pancreatic metastasis. The patient was successfully treated with surgical interventions, including distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.

CONCLUSION

This report summarizes the available treatment modalities for CCS and the importance of regular postoperative follow-up for patients with CCS.

Review on Lymph Node Metastases, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, and Lymphadenectomy in Sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) originating from connective tissue rarely affect the lymph nodes. However, involvement of lymph nodes in STS is an important aspect of prognosis and treatment. Currently, there is no consensus on the diagnosis and management of lymph node metastases in STS. The key risk factor for nodal involvement is the histological subtype of sarcoma. Radiological and pathological evaluation seems to be the most effective method of assessing lymph nodes in these neoplasms. Thus, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which has been shown to be valuable in the management of melanoma or breast cancer, may also be a beneficial diagnostic option in some high-risk STS subtypes. This review summarizes data on the risk factors and clinical characteristics of lymph node involvement in STS. Possible management and therapeutic options are also discussed.

Factors associated with survival in patients with clear cell sarcoma

Aims

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) of soft-tissue is a rare melanocytic subtype of mesenchymal malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and therapeutic factors associated with increased survival, stratified by clinical stage, in order to determine the optimal treatment.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis involving 117 patients with histologically confirmed CCS, between July 2016 and November 2017, who were enrolled in the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry in Japan.

Results

The five- and ten-year survival rates were 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 29 to 52) and 37% (95% CI 25 to 49), respectively. On multivariable analysis, the size of the tumour of > 10 cm (p = 0.006), lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), and no surgery for the primary tumour (p = 0.019) were independently associated with a poor survival. For N0M0 CCS (n = 68), the development of distant metastases was an independent prognostic factor for survival (early (< 12 months), hazard ratio (HR) 116.78 (95% CI 11.69 to 1,166.50); p < 0.001; late (> 12 months), HR 14.79 (95% CI 1.66 to 131.63); p = 0.016); neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.895) and/or radiotherapy (p = 0.216) were not significantly associated with survival. The five-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 19% (95% CI 8 to 35) and the size of the tumour was significantly associated with an increased rate of local recurrence (p = 0.012). For N1M0 CCS (n = 18), the risk of mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery for both the primary tumour and lymph node metastases (HR 0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.56); p = 0.020). For M1 CCS (n = 31), excision of the primary tumour was independently associated with better survival (HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.76); p = 0.013). There was no significant difference in survival between the different types of systemic treatment (p = 0.523).

Conclusion

Complete excision of the primary tumour and lymph nodes is associated with a better survival in patients with CCS. Systemic treatment appears to provide limited benefits, demonstrating a pressing need for novel systemic agents.

Clear cell sarcoma: state-of-the art and perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an ultrarare soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with a poor prognosis due to its propensity to metastasize and its low chemosensitivity. The standard treatment of localized CCS consists of wide surgical excision with or without additive radiotherapy. However, unresectable CCS is generally treated with conventional systemic therapies available for treatment of STS despite the weak scientific evidence to support its use.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the clinicopathologic characteristics of CSS, as well as the current treatment landscape and future therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

The current treatment strategy of advanced CCSs, based on STSs regimens, shows a lack of effective options. Combination therapiesin particular, the association of immunotherapy and TKIs, represent a promising approach. Translational studies are needed in order to decipher the regulatory mechanisms involved in the oncogenesis of this ultrarare sarcoma and identify potential molecular targets.

Case report: Robust response of metastatic clear cell sarcoma treated with cabozantinib and immunotherapy

Clear Cell Sarcoma (CCS), also referred to as malignant melanoma of soft parts, is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor. It comprises 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas and is known to be radio- and chemotherapy resistant. CCS shares morphological and immunohistochemical features with malignant melanoma, including melanin biosynthesis and melanocytic markers. However, it is distinct for the presence of EWSR1-ATF1 translocation which activates MITF transcription factor. We report here of an aggressive case of CCS in a 9-year-old patient, which demonstrates the critical role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of uncommon cancer variants in the era of personalized medicine. The EWSR1-ATF1 translocation induces pathological c-Met activation, and so, following unsuccessful CTLA4 and PD-1 blockade immunotherapy, the child received cabozantinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with the intent to block c-Met oncogenic effect. In parallel, active immunization, using hapten di-nitrophenyl modified autologous tumor cells was administered with monotherapy PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab. Under this "triplet" therapy, the patient attained an initial partial response and was progression-free for 2 years, in good performance status and resumed schooling. Based on our observation, cabozantinib can be used as an effective and potentially life-prolonging treatment in CCS. We suggest that priming the child's immune system using her autologous tumor and combating T cell exhaustion with PD-1 blockade may have synergized with the targeted therapy. Combining targeted and immunotherapy is a rapidly growing practice in solid tumors and provides a glimpse of hope in situations that previously lacked any treatment option.

Clinical Experience with Apatinib and Camrelizumab in Advance Clear Cell Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Advanced clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare subtype of sarcoma with few effective treatments. Evidence shows that apatinib is efficacious and safe for CCS. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib and/or camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) in treating advanced CCS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients with advanced CCS who received apatinib and/or camrelizumab therapy between November 2018 and July 2021. Standard descriptive statistics were employed for continuous variables and categorical variables (number and percentage).

Results

Of the 12 CCS patients, 3 had a partial response (PR), and 4 had stable disease (SD). Among the 5 patients treated with apatinib monotherapy, 1 PR and 2 SD were found, and the addition or replacement of camrelizumab after progressive disease (PD) did not work. In the 4 patients who received apatinib plus camrelizumab combination therapy, 1 PR and 1 SD were found. All 3 patients who received camrelizumab first had PD, and 1 PR and 1 SD were found after adding apatinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were significantly more common in the apatinib plus camrelizumab combination therapy than in the apatinib or camrelizumab monotherapy, and these included increased aspartate aminotransferase and increased alanine aminotransferase levels.

Conclusion

Apatinib has promising effectiveness for CCS. Camrelizumab efficacy for the treatment of clear cell sarcoma is inconclusive. The efficacy of apatinib and PD-1 inhibitors in CCS need to be further investigated in prospective clinical trials.

Uncommon and peculiar soft tissue sarcomas: Multidisciplinary review and practical recommendations. Spanish Group for Sarcoma research (GEIS -GROUP). Part II

Among all Soft Tissue sarcomas there are some subtypes with low incidence and/or peculiar clinical behaviour, that need to be consider separately. Most of them are orphan diseases, whose biological characteristics imply a clearly different diagnostic and therapeutic approach from other more common sarcoma tumors. We present a brief and updated multidiciplinary review, focused on practical issues, aimed at helping clinicians in decision making. In this second part we review these subtypes: Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma, Epithelioid Sarcoma, Clear Cell Sarcoma, Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor, Rhabdoid Tumor, Phyllodes Tumor, Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors, Myoepithelial Tumor, Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms (PEComas), Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma, NTRK-fusions Sarcomas. Most of them present their own radiological and histopathological feautures, that are essential to know in order to achieve early diagnosis. In some of them, molecular diagnosis is mandatory, not only in the diagnosis, but also to plan the treatment. On the other hand, and despite the low incidence, a great scientific research effort has been made to achieve new treatment opportunities for these patients even with approved indications. These include new treatments with targeted therapies and immunotherapy, which today represent possible therapeutic options. It is especially important to be attentive to new and potential avenues of research, and to promote the conduct of specific clinical trials for rare sarcomas.

Epidemiology and prognosis of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database

AIM

Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare histological types of solid tumors. The present study aims to comprehensively describe the demographic and clinical features of LELC using surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database, with an emphasis on the prognostic difference according to primary tumor sites of LELC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population cohort with histologically diagnosed LELC were identified from SEER database between 1973 and 2016. Age-adjusted incidence rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined. Cox-regression proportional hazards model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 2106 patients with LELC were identified, with the most common diagnosed primary tumor site of nasopharyngeal LELC (56.22%), followed by non-nasopharyngeal head and neck LELC (21.32%) and respiratory system (7.83%). The overall age-adjusted incidence of LELC was 0.091 per 100,000. The CSS rates of LELC patients at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 76%, 69%, 65%, and 61%, respectively. A tendency of decreasing incidence of LELC was observed in the past decade. Univariate analysis indicated that sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, p = 0.031], year of diagnosis (HR 0.60 and 0.63, p < 0.001), race (HR 1.29, p = 0.0021), age (HR 1.25, p = 0.0072), summary tumor stage (HR 1.97, and 4.57, both p < 0.001), number of positive LN(HR2.21, p < 0.001), surgery (HR 0.58, p = 0.0033), chemotherapy (HR 1.19, p = 0.037) and primary tumor site (p < 0.001) were significant factors associated with prognosis of LELC. In multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.75, p = 0.03), distant stage (HR 6.57, p = 0.0001), number of positive LN (HR 2.63, p = 0.0015) and non-nasopharyngeal head and neck LELC (HR 0.37, p = 0.0031) were significantly independent predictors for CSS of LELC. In sub-group analysis, radiotherapy significantly improves CSS for nasopharyngeal LELC (HR 0.57, p = 0.0002), while surgery significantly improve CSS for non-nasopharyngeal LELC (HR 0.33, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Based on SEER data analysis, age older than 50 years, distant stage and more than three positive LN are significantly associated with worse CSS for LELC, while the prognosis of non-nasopharyngeal head and neck LELC is significantly better than nasopharyngeal LELC. Local treatments for LELC could be recommended according to primary tumor sites.