In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology

A novel approach for gingiva thickness measurements around lower anterior teeth by means of dental magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

This diagnostic accuracy study aims to present the first measurements of gingiva thickness around lower anterior teeth using dental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare these measurements with two established methods: (1) gingival phenotype assessment via periodontal probing, and (2) the superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans with intraoral scans of teeth and gums.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with substantial orthodontic treatment need and anterior mandibular crowding were consecutively included in this clinical case series. After periodontal probing, each patient underwent a CBCT scan, an intraoral scan of the mandible, and an MRI investigation using a novel mandibula 15-channel dental coil.

RESULTS

The mean gingiva thickness was 0.72 mm measured on MRI and 0.97 mm measured on CBCT, with a mean difference between the measurement methods of 0.17 ± 0.27 mm (p < 0.001). Measurement agreement between the index tests (MRI and CBCT) and the clinical reference standard (probing) yielded an overall percent agreement of 64.94% and 47.02% for MRI and CBCT, respectively. Teeth with thin phenotypes were associated with lower soft tissue dimensions in both free (MRI: 0.56 mm vs. CBCT: 0.79 mm) and supracrestal gingiva (MRI: 0.75 mm vs. CBCT: 1.03 mm) when compared to those with thick phenotypes. However, only the measurements obtained from MRI scans showed statistically significant differences between the two phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

Dental MRI successfully visualizes delicate structures like the gingiva in the anterior mandible and achieves a high correlation with superimposed CBCT scans, with clinically acceptable deviations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The present study helps to establish dental MRI as a radiation-free alternative to conventional radiographic methods.

Current landmarks for gingival thickness evaluation in maxillary anterior teeth: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To identify and report the current landmarks used for measuring gingival thickness (GT) in healthy maxillary anterior teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The protocol of this Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020-compliant systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. A literature search was conducted to identify articles that met the eligibility criteria published up to 2022. The methods of assessing gingival thickness and the landmarks adopted on the studies were described. Primary outcomes were identified, and the frequency of reporting in the selected articles was calculated. Additionally, risk-of-bias assessments were performed for individual articles.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles (34 with low risk of bias and 24 with medium risk of bias) were selected. A total of 3638 individuals had their gingival thickness measured. Thirty-nine different landmarks were adopted in the studies. Fifty-six articles with 22 landmarks were included in the meta-analysis. A higher heterogeneity was found between the studies (GT ranged from 0.48 to 2.59 mm, mean GT 1.074; 95% CI: 1.024-1.104). The 3 most used landmarks were 2 mm from gingival margin (10 studies, mean GT 1.170 mm, 95% CI: 1.085-1.254), bone crest (9 studies, mean GT 1.01 mm; 95% CI: 0.937-1.083), and cemento-enamel junction (7 studies, mean GT 1.172 mm; 95% CI: 1.105, 1.239).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of this study, a large heterogeneity in GT was found, and there was no consensus on the ideal landmark for GT measurement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The landmark 2 mm from gingival margin, located at attached gingiva, can be used for GT measurement by clinical and image-based devices. This is an important step for a quantitative instead of a qualitative evaluation of phenotypes.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Method and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined with Intraoral Scanning and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Method in Determining the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods: ultrasonic gingival thickness measurement (UGTM) and cone-beam computed tomography, intraoral scanning by computer-aided design technology with prosthetic-driven implant planning software (CBCT/CAD/PDIP) in determining the gingival phenotype (GP). Thirty periodontally healthy patients were examined. The ultrasonic device Pirop G^® with a frequency of 20 MHz and CBCT/CAD/PDIP were used to measure gingival thickness at upper canines and incisors in three points localized midbuccally, namely free gingival thickness (FGT), supracrestal (SGT) and crestal (CGT). Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and width of keratinized tissue (WKT) were measured using periodontal probe. Intra-examiner and inter-examiner agreement and agreement between methods were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. Comparing both methods in the determination of SGT (bias = 0.17 mm, SD = 0.25 mm, p < 0.000) and CGT (bias = -0.45 mm, SD = 0.32 mm, p < 0.000) 95.0% and 95.6% agreement were found, respectively, and in the FGT range only 93.3% (bias = -0.45 mm, SD = 0.32 mm, p < 0.000). The presence of positive correlations between WKT and SGT was shown. A positive correlation between SGT and WKT confirms the purpose of measuring these parameters for the evaluation of the GP. Both the ultrasonic method and cone-beam computed tomography combined with intraoral scanning and prosthetic-driven implant planning method were useful in determining gingival phenotype, however, the ultrasonic method was more accurate for measuring GT.

Evaluation of the association between gingival phenotype and alveolar bone thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the association between gingival phenotype (GP) and the underlying alveolar bone thickness (ABT).

DESIGN

An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Science. The following inclusion criteria were applied: English original studies that compared the ABT in periodontally healthy patients presenting thin versus thick GPs. Studies that evaluated the correlation between gingival thickness (GT) and ABT were also included. Pooled mean difference (95% confidence interval) was estimated using random-effects maximum likelihood model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

From a total of 1427 retrieved articles, 17 were included. The majority of eight studies that compared the ABT between thick and thin GPs, reported a significantly greater ABT associated with a thick phenotype. Based on the meta-analysis results of six studies, the mean difference between the two phenotypes (0.33 mm) was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The majority of ten studies that investigated the correlation between GT and ABT evidenced a significant positive correlation (r = 0.11 -0.49). The association was more evident in the crestal areas and decreased toward the apex.

CONCLUSIONS

There is contradictory evidence concerning the correlation between soft and hard tissue thickness; however, the meta-analysis revealed a significantly thicker alveolar plate in the presence of a thick phenotype. Since the evaluation of GP could be simply performed using a periodontal probe, such a relationship could provide clinical perspective at the initial examination. This is particularly beneficial in procedures affecting periodontal structures, including immediate implant placement and orthodontic treatments.