A Review of the Role of the S-Detect Computer-Aided Diagnostic Ultrasound System in the Evaluation of Benign and Malignant Breast and Thyroid Masses

Comparative Analysis of the Diagnostic Value of S-Detect Technology in Different Planes Versus the BI-RADS Classification for Breast Lesions

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

S-Detect, a deep learning-based Computer-Aided Detection system, is recognized as an important tool for diagnosing breast lesions using ultrasound imaging. However, it may exhibit inconsistent findings across multiple imaging planes. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of S-Detect in different planes and identify factors contributing to these inconsistencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 711 patients with 756 breast lesions between January 2019 and January 2022. S-Detect was utilized to assess lesions in radial and anti-radial planes. BI-RADS classifications were employed for comparative analysis. The diagnostic performance was compared within each group, and p-values were computed for intergroup comparisons. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors contributing to diagnostic inconsistency in S-Detect across planes.

RESULTS

Among 756 breast lesions, 668 (88.4%) exhibited consistent S-Detect outcomes across planes while 88 (11.6%) were inconsistent. In the consistent group, the diagnostic accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of S-Detect were significantly higher than those of BI-RADS (accuracy: 91.2% vs. 84.9%, p = 0.045; AUC: 0.916 vs. 0.859, p = 0.036). In the inconsistent group, the diagnostic accuracy and AUC of S-Detect in radial and anti-radial planes were lower than those of BI-RADS (accuracy: 47.7% for radial, 52.2% for anti-radial vs. 69.3% for BI-RADS, p = 0.014, p-anti = 0.039; AUC: 0.503 for radial, 0.497 for anti-radial vs. 0.739 for BI-RADS, p = 0.042, p-anti <0.001). Diagnostic inconsistency in S-Detect across planes was significantly associated with lesion size, indistinct or angular margins, and enhancement posterior acoustic features (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

S-Detect has outperformed BI-RADS in diagnostic precision under conditions of inter-planar concordance. However, its diagnostic efficacy is compromised in scenarios of inter-planar discordance. Under these circumstances, the results of S-Detect should be carefully referenced.

Deep learning to assist composition classification and thyroid solid nodule diagnosis: a multicenter diagnostic study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to propose a deep learning (DL)-based framework for identifying the composition of thyroid nodules and assessing their malignancy risk.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study using ultrasound images from four hospitals. Convolutional neural network (CNN) models were constructed to classify ultrasound images of thyroid nodules into solid and non-solid, as well as benign and malignant. A total of 11,201 images of 6784 nodules were used for training, validation, and testing. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed as the primary evaluation index.

RESULTS

The models had AUCs higher than 0.91 in the benign and malignant grading of solid thyroid nodules, with the Inception-ResNet AUC being the highest at 0.94. In the test set, the best algorithm for identifying benign and malignant thyroid nodules had a sensitivity of 0.88, and a specificity of 0.86. In the human vs. DL test set, the best algorithm had a sensitivity of 0.93, and a specificity of 0.86. The Inception-ResNet model performed better than the senior physicians (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal model based on the external test set were 0.90 and 0.75, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This research demonstrates that CNNs can assist thyroid nodule diagnosis and reduce the rate of unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

High-resolution ultrasound has led to increased detection of thyroid nodules. This results in unnecessary fine-needle aspiration and anxiety for patients whose nodules are benign. Deep learning can solve these problems to some extent.

KEY POINTS

• Thyroid solid nodules have a high probability of malignancy. • Our models can improve the differentiation between benign and malignant solid thyroid nodules. • The differential performance of one model was superior to that of senior radiologists. Applying this could reduce the rate of unnecessary fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules.

Barriers and facilitators of artificial intelligence conception and implementation for breast imaging diagnosis in clinical practice: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Although artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated promise in enhancing breast cancer diagnosis, the implementation of AI algorithms in clinical practice encounters various barriers. This scoping review aims to identify these barriers and facilitators to highlight key considerations for developing and implementing AI solutions in breast cancer imaging.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted from 2012 to 2022 in six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINHAL, Embase, IEEE, and ArXiv). The articles were included if some barriers and/or facilitators in the conception or implementation of AI in breast clinical imaging were described. We excluded research only focusing on performance, or with data not acquired in a clinical radiology setup and not involving real patients.

RESULTS

A total of 107 articles were included. We identified six major barriers related to data (B1), black box and trust (B2), algorithms and conception (B3), evaluation and validation (B4), legal, ethical, and economic issues (B5), and education (B6), and five major facilitators covering data (F1), clinical impact (F2), algorithms and conception (F3), evaluation and validation (F4), and education (F5).

CONCLUSION

This scoping review highlighted the need to carefully design, deploy, and evaluate AI solutions in clinical practice, involving all stakeholders to yield improvement in healthcare.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The identification of barriers and facilitators with suggested solutions can guide and inform future research, and stakeholders to improve the design and implementation of AI for breast cancer detection in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• Six major identified barriers were related to data; black-box and trust; algorithms and conception; evaluation and validation; legal, ethical, and economic issues; and education. • Five major identified facilitators were related to data, clinical impact, algorithms and conception, evaluation and validation, and education. • Coordinated implication of all stakeholders is required to improve breast cancer diagnosis with AI.

Comparison of artificial intelligence, elastic imaging, and the thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the differential diagnosis of suspicious nodules

Background

Ultrasound is widely used for detecting thyroid nodules in clinical practice. This retrospective study aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS), S-Detect, and elastography of the carotid artery for suspicious thyroid nodules and to determine the complementary value of artificial intelligence and elastography.

Methods

Between January 2021 and November 2021, 101 consecutive patients with 138 thyroid nodules were enrolled in The First Hospital of China Medical University. All nodules were evaluated using ACR-TIRADS categories (TR), S-Detect, and elastography, and then the diagnostic performance of the different methods and the combined assessment were compared. The inclusion criteria were the following: (I) TR3, TR4, and TR5 nodules, which were defined as "suspicious nodules"; (II) patients who had surgical or cytopathological results after ultrasound examination; and (III) voluntary enrollment in this study. Meanwhile, the exclusion criteria were the following: (I) TR1 and TR2 nodules, (II) patients who had undergone fine-needle aspiration before ultrasound examination, and (III) inconclusive cytologic findings.

Results

A total of 71 patients (12 men and 59 women) with 94 suspicious thyroid nodules (42 benign nodules and 52 malignant nodules) were finally included in this study. S-Detect had a significantly better sensitivity than did ACR-TIRADS [S-Detect: 98.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 89.7-100.0%; ACR-TIRADS: 84.6%, 95% CI: 71.9-93.1%; P=0.036], but its specificity was much lower (S-Detect: 19.0%; 95% CI: 8.6-34.1%; ACR-TIRADS: 40.5%, 95% CI: 25.6-56.7%; P=0.032). The accuracy was not significantly different between S-Detect (62.8%; 95% CI: 52.2-72.5%) and ACR-TIRADS (64.9%; 95% CI: 54.4-74.5%) (P=0.761). The elasticity contrast index (ECI) was not definitively useful in identifying suspicious thyroid nodules (P=0.592). Compared with the use of ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect alone, the specificity (45.2%; 95% CI: 29.8-61.3%), positive predictive value (65.2%; 95% CI: 52.4-76.5%), accuracy (66.0%; 95% CI: 55.5-75.4%), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.640; 95% CI: 0.534-0.736) of their combination were higher but not significantly so.

Conclusions

At present, S-Detect cannot replace manual diagnosis, and the value of elastography of the carotid artery in diagnosing suspected thyroid nodules remains unclear.

Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasound: application in clinical practice

Ultrasound (US) is a widely accessible and extensively used tool for breast imaging. It is commonly used as an additional screening tool, especially for women with dense breast tissue. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various AI systems that assist radiologists in identifying and diagnosing breast lesions using US. This article provides an overview of the background and supporting evidence for the use of AI in hand held breast US. It discusses the impact of AI on clinical workflow, covering breast cancer detection, diagnosis, prediction of molecular subtypes, evaluation of axillary lymph node status, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the article highlights the potential significance of AI in breast US for low and middle income countries.

Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound

Breast ultrasound has emerged as a valuable imaging modality in the detection and characterization of breast lesions, particularly in women with dense breast tissue or contraindications for mammography. Within this framework, artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered significant attention for its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in breast ultrasound and revolutionize the workflow. This review article aims to comprehensively explore the current state of research and development in harnessing AI's capabilities for breast ultrasound. We delve into various AI techniques, including machine learning, deep learning, as well as their applications in automating lesion detection, segmentation, and classification tasks. Furthermore, the review addresses the challenges and hurdles faced in implementing AI systems in breast ultrasound diagnostics, such as data privacy, interpretability, and regulatory approval. Ethical considerations pertaining to the integration of AI into clinical practice are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a patient-centered approach. The integration of AI into breast ultrasound holds great promise for improving diagnostic accuracy, enhancing efficiency, and ultimately advancing patient's care. By examining the current state of research and identifying future opportunities, this review aims to contribute to the understanding and utilization of AI in breast ultrasound and encourage further interdisciplinary collaboration to maximize its potential in clinical practice.

Clinical Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in Breast Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound tends to present very high sensitivity but relatively low specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), which would result in unnecessary breast biopsies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the diagnostic performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) (S-Detect) system in differentiating breast lesions and reducing unnecessary biopsies in non-university hospitals in less-developed regions of China.

METHODS

The study was a prospective multicenter study from 8 hospitals. The ultrasound images, and cine, CAD analysis, and BI-RADS were recorded. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed and compared between CAD and radiologists. The Youden Index (YI) was used to determine optimal cut-off for the number of planes to downgrade.

RESULTS

A total of 491 breast lesions were included in the study. Less-experienced radiologists combined CAD was superior to less-experienced radiologists alone in AUC (0.878 vs 0.712, p < 0.001), and specificity (81.3% vs 44.6%, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in AUC (0.891 vs 0.878, p = 0.346), and specificity (82.3% vs 81.3%, p = 0.791) between experienced radiologists and less-experienced radiologists combined CAD. With CAD assistance, the biopsy rate of less-experienced radiologists was significantly decreased (100.0% vs 25.6%, p < 0.001), and malignant rate of biopsy was significantly increased (15.0% vs 43.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CAD system can be an effective auxiliary tool in differentiating breast lesions and reducing unnecessary biopsies for radiologists from non-university hospitals in less-developed regions of China.

Development of an interpretable machine learning model for Ki-67 prediction in breast cancer using intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics features

Background

Traditional immunohistochemistry assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer (BC) via core needle biopsy is invasive, inaccurate, and nonrepeatable. While machine learning (ML) provides a promising alternative, its effectiveness depends on extensive data. Although the current mainstream MRI-centered radiomics offers sufficient data, its unsuitability for repeated examinations, along with limited accessibility and an intratumoral focus, constrain the application of predictive models in evaluating Ki-67 levels.

Objective

This study aims to explore ultrasound (US) image-based radiomics, incorporating both intra- and peritumoral features, to develop an interpretable ML model for predicting Ki-67 expression in BC patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 263 BC patients, divided into training and external validation cohorts. From intratumoral and peritumoral regions of interest (ROIs) in US images, 849 distinctive radiomics features per ROI were derived. These features underwent systematic selection to analyze Ki-67 expression relationships. Four ML models-logistic regression, random forests, support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting-were formulated and internally validated to identify the optimal predictive model. External validation was executed to ascertain the robustness of the optimal model, followed by employing Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to reveal the significant features of the model.

Results

Among 231 selected BC patients, 67.5% exhibited high Ki-67 expression, with consistency observed across both training and validation cohorts as well as other clinical characteristics. Of the 1698 radiomics features identified, 15 were significantly correlated with Ki-67 expression. The SVM model, utilizing combined ROI, demonstrated the highest accuracy [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.88], making it the most suitable for predicting Ki-67 expression. External validation sustained an AUROC of 0.82, affirming the model's robustness above a 40% threshold. SHAP analysis identified five influential features from intra- and peritumoral ROIs, offering insight into individual prediction.

Conclusion

This study emphasized the potential of SVM model using radiomics features from both intra- and peritumoral US images, for predicting elevated Ki-67 levels in BC patients. The model exhibited strong performance in validations, indicating its promise as a noninvasive tool to enable personalized decision-making in BC care.

Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion Classification on Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Radiologists Without Breast Ultrasound Expertise

BACKGROUND. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast ultrasound interpretation have been primarily evaluated at tertiary and/or urban medical centers by radiologists with breast ultrasound expertise. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of deep learning-based CAD software on the diagnostic performance of radiologists without breast ultrasound expertise at secondary or rural hospitals in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions measuring up to 2.0 cm on ultrasound. METHODS. This prospective study included patients scheduled to undergo biopsy or surgical resection at any of eight participating secondary or rural hospitals in China of a breast lesion classified as BI-RADS category 3-5 on prior breast ultrasound from November 2021 to September 2022. Patients underwent an additional investigational breast ultrasound, performed and interpreted by a radiologist without breast ultrasound expertise (hybrid body/breast radiologists, either who lacked breast imaging subspecialty training or for whom the number of breast ultrasounds performed annually accounted for less than 10% of all ultrasounds performed annually by the radiologist), who assigned a BI-RADS category. CAD results were used to upgrade reader-assigned BI-RADS category 3 lesions to category 4A and to downgrade reader-assigned BI-RADS category 4A lesions to category 3. Histologic results of biopsy or resection served as the reference standard. RESULTS. The study included 313 patients (mean age, 47.0 ± 14.0 years) with 313 breast lesions (102 malignant, 211 benign). Of BI-RADS category 3 lesions, 6.0% (6/100) were upgraded by CAD to category 4A, of which 16.7% (1/6) were malignant. Of category 4A lesions, 79.1% (87/110) were downgraded by CAD to category 3, of which 4.6% (4/87) were malignant. Diagnostic performance was significantly better after application of CAD, in comparison with before application of CAD, in terms of accuracy (86.6% vs 62.6%, p < .001), specificity (82.9% vs 46.0%, p < .001), and PPV (72.7% vs 46.5%, p < .001) but not significantly different in terms of sensitivity (94.1% vs 97.1%, p = .38) or NPV (96.7% vs 97.0%, p > .99). CONCLUSION. CAD significantly improved radiologists' diagnostic performance, showing particular potential to reduce the frequency of benign breast biopsies. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings indicate the ability of CAD to improve patient care in settings with incomplete access to breast imaging expertise.

Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The performance in evaluating thyroid nodules on ultrasound varies across different risk stratification systems, leading to inconsistency and uncertainty regarding diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Objective

Comparing diagnostic performance of detecting thyroid cancer among distinct ultrasound risk stratification systems proposed in the last five years.

Evidence acquisition

Systematic search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to find relevant research up to December 8, 2022, whose study contents contained elucidation of diagnostic performance of any one of the above ultrasound risk stratification systems (European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System[Eu-TIRADS]; American College of Radiology TIRADS [ACR TIRADS]; Chinese version of TIRADS [C-TIRADS]; Computer-aided diagnosis system based on deep learning [S-Detect]). Based on golden diagnostic standard in histopathology and cytology, single meta-analysis was performed to obtain the optimal cut-off value for each system, and then network meta-analysis was conducted on the best risk stratification category in each system.

Evidence synthesis

This network meta-analysis included 88 studies with a total of 59,304 nodules. The most accurate risk category thresholds were TR5 for Eu-TIRADS, TR5 for ACR TIRADS, TR4b and above for C-TIRADS, and possible malignancy for S-Detect. At the best thresholds, sensitivity of these systems ranged from 68% to 82% and specificity ranged from 71% to 81%. It identified the highest sensitivity for C-TIRADS TR4b and the highest specificity for ACR TIRADS TR5. However, sensitivity for ACR TIRADS TR5 was the lowest. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under curve (AUC) were ranked first in C-TIRADS.

Conclusion

Among four ultrasound risk stratification options, this systemic review preliminarily proved that C-TIRADS possessed favorable diagnostic performance for thyroid nodules.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, CRD42022382818.

Ultrasonography-based radiomics and computer-aided diagnosis in thyroid nodule management: performance comparison and clinical strategy optimization

Objectives

To compare ultrasonography (US) feature-based radiomics and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) models for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules, and to evaluate their utility for thyroid nodule management.

Methods

This prospective study included 262 thyroid nodules obtained between January 2022 and June 2022. All nodules previously underwent standardized US image acquisition, and the nature of the nodules was confirmed by the pathological results. The CAD model exploited two vertical US images of the thyroid nodule to differentiate the lesions. The least absolute shrinkage and operator algorithm (LASSO) was applied to choose radiomics features with excellent predictive properties for building a radiomics model. Ultimately, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves were assessed to compare diagnostic performance between the models. DeLong's test was used to analyze the difference between groups. Both models were used to revise the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (ACR TI-RADS) to provide biopsy recommendations, and their performance was compared with the original recommendations.

Results

Of the 262 thyroid nodules, 157 were malignant, and the remaining 105 were benign. The diagnostic performance of radiomics, CAD, and ACR TI-RADS models had an AUC of 0.915 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.881-0.947), 0.814 (95% CI: 0.766-0.863), and 0.849 (95% CI: 0.804-0.894), respectively. DeLong's test showed a statistically significant between the AUC values of models (p < 0.05). Calibration curves showed good agreement in each model. When both models were applied to revise the ACR TI-RADS, our recommendations significantly improved the performance. The revised recommendations based on radiomics and CAD showed an increased sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, and decreased unnecessary fine-needle aspiration rates. Furthermore, the radiomics model's improvement scale was more pronounced (33.3-16.7% vs. 33.3-9.7%).

Conclusion

The radiomics strategy and CAD system showed good diagnostic performance for discriminating thyroid nodules and could be used to optimize the ACR TI-RADS recommendation, which successfully reduces unnecessary biopsies, especially in the radiomics model.

AI: Can It Make a Difference to the Predictive Value of Ultrasound Breast Biopsy?

(1) Background: This study aims to compare the ground truth (pathology results) against the BI-RADS classification of images acquired while performing breast ultrasound diagnostic examinations that led to a biopsy and against the result of processing the same images through the AI algorithm KOIOS DS ^TM (KOIOS). (2) Methods: All results of biopsies performed with ultrasound guidance during 2019 were recovered from the pathology department. Readers selected the image which better represented the BI-RADS classification, confirmed correlation to the biopsied image, and submitted it to the KOIOS AI software. The results of the BI-RADS classification of the diagnostic study performed at our institution were set against the KOIOS classification and both were compared to the pathology reports. (3) Results: 403 cases were included in this study. Pathology rendered 197 malignant and 206 benign reports. Four biopsies on BI-RADS 0 and two images are included. Of fifty BI-RADS 3 cases biopsied, only seven rendered cancers. All but one had a positive or suspicious cytology; all were classified as suspicious by KOIOS. Using KOIOS, 17 B3 biopsies could have been avoided. Of 347 BI-RADS 4, 5, and 6 cases, 190 were malignant (54.7%). Because only KOIOS suspicious and probably malignant categories should be biopsied, 312 biopsies would have resulted in 187 malignant lesions (60%), but 10 cancers would have been missed. (4) Conclusions: KOIOS had a higher ratio of positive biopsies in this selected case study vis-à-vis the BI-RADS 4, 5 and 6 categories. A large number of biopsies in the BI-RADS 3 category could have been avoided.

Artificial Intelligence for Breast US

US is a widely available, commonly used, and indispensable imaging modality for breast evaluation. It is often the primary imaging modality for the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer in low-resource settings. In addition, it is frequently employed as a supplemental screening tool via either whole breast handheld US or automated breast US among women with dense breasts. In recent years, a variety of artificial intelligence systems have been developed to assist radiologists with the detection and diagnosis of breast lesions on US. This article reviews the background and evidence supporting the use of artificial intelligence tools for breast US, describes implementation strategies and impact on clinical workflow, and discusses potential emerging roles and future directions.

The Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound S-Detect Technology for Thyroid Nodules

This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of ultrasound TI-RADS classification used by sonographers with different ultrasound diagnosis experience in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules and the diagnostic value of using artificial intelligence ultrasound S-Detect technology in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid lesions. 100 patients who underwent ultrasound examination of thyroid masses in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 and were further punctured or operated on were included in the study. Pathological results were used as the gold standard to evaluate ultrasound S-Detect technology and the value of TI-RADS classification and the combined application of the two in diagnosing benign and malignant thyroid TI-RADS 4 types of nodules, and the consistency of judgments of doctors of different ages is assessed by a Kappa value. There were 128 nodules in 100 patients, 51 benign nodules, and 77 malignant nodules. For senior physicians, the sensitivity of diagnosis using TI-RADS classification combined with ultrasound S-Detect technology is 93.5%, specificity is 94.1%, and accuracy is 93.8%; for middle-aged physicians using TI-RADS classification combined with ultrasound S-Detect technology for diagnosis, the sensitivity is 89.6%, specificity is 92.2%, and accuracy is 90.6%; for junior doctors, the sensitivity of diagnosis using TI-RADS classification combined with ultrasound S-Detect technology is 83.1%, specificity is 88.2%, and accuracy is 85.1%. Regardless of seniority, the combined application of artificial intelligence ultrasound S-Detect technology and TI-RADS classification can improve the diagnostic ability of sonographers for thyroid nodules and at the same time improve the consistency of judgment among physicians, and this is especially important for radiologists.

No sonographer, no radiologist: Assessing accuracy of artificial intelligence on breast ultrasound volume sweep imaging scans

Breast ultrasound provides a first-line evaluation for breast masses, but the majority of the world lacks access to any form of diagnostic imaging. In this pilot study, we assessed the combination of artificial intelligence (Samsung S-Detect for Breast) with volume sweep imaging (VSI) ultrasound scans to evaluate the possibility of inexpensive, fully automated breast ultrasound acquisition and preliminary interpretation without an experienced sonographer or radiologist. This study was conducted using examinations from a curated data set from a previously published clinical study of breast VSI. Examinations in this data set were obtained by medical students without prior ultrasound experience who performed VSI using a portable Butterfly iQ ultrasound probe. Standard of care ultrasound exams were performed concurrently by an experienced sonographer using a high-end ultrasound machine. Expert-selected VSI images and standard of care images were input into S-Detect which output mass features and classification as "possibly benign" and "possibly malignant." Subsequent comparison of the S-Detect VSI report was made between 1) the standard of care ultrasound report by an expert radiologist, 2) the standard of care ultrasound S-Detect report, 3) the VSI report by an expert radiologist, and 4) the pathological diagnosis. There were 115 masses analyzed by S-Detect from the curated data set. There was substantial agreement of the S-Detect interpretation of VSI among cancers, cysts, fibroadenomas, and lipomas to the expert standard of care ultrasound report (Cohen's κ = 0.73 (0.57-0.9 95% CI), p<0.0001), the standard of care ultrasound S-Detect interpretation (Cohen's κ = 0.79 (0.65-0.94 95% CI), p<0.0001), the expert VSI ultrasound report (Cohen's κ = 0.73 (0.57-0.9 95% CI), p<0.0001), and the pathological diagnosis (Cohen's κ = 0.80 (0.64-0.95 95% CI), p<0.0001). All pathologically proven cancers (n = 20) were designated as "possibly malignant" by S-Detect with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86%. Integration of artificial intelligence and VSI could allow both acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images without a sonographer and radiologist. This approach holds potential for increasing access to ultrasound imaging and therefore improving outcomes related to breast cancer in low- and middle- income countries.

S-Thyroid Computer-Aided Diagnosis Ultrasound System of Thyroid Nodules: Correlation Between Transverse and Longitudinal Planes

Introduction: We compare the differences in the diagnostic results of S-thyroid, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software, based on two mutually perpendicular planes. Methods: Initially, 149 thyroid nodules confirmed by surgical pathology were enrolled in our study. CAD in our study was based on the ACR TI-RADS lexicon. t test, rank-sum test, and Chi-square test were used. The interclass correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa were used to explore the correlation between CAD features. Receiver operating characteristic was plotted for different combinations of CAD features. Results: The patient's age, transverse diameter, longitudinal diameter, shape, margin, echogenicity, echogenic foci, composition, TI-RADS classification, and risk probability of nodules in the transverse and longitudinal planes were related to thyroid cancer (p < 0.05). The AUC (95%CI) of TI-RADS classification in the transverse plane of CAD is better than that of the longitudinal plane [0.90 (0.84-0.95) vs. 0.83 (0.77-0.90), p = 0.04]. The AUC (95%CI) of risk probability of nodules in the transverse planes shows no difference from that in the longitudinal plane statistically [0.90 (0.85-0.95) vs. 0.88 (0.82-0.94), p = 0.52]. The AUC (95% CI), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy [TI-RADS classification (transverse plane) + TI-RADS classification (longitudinal plane) + risk (transverse plane) + risk (longitudinal plane)] are 0.93 (0.89-0.97), 86.15%, 90.48%, and 88.59%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnosis of thyroid cancer in the CAD transverse plane was superior to that in the CAD longitudinal plane when using the TI-RADS classification, but there was no difference in the diagnosis between the two planes when using risk. However, the combination of CAD transverse and longitudinal planes had the best diagnostic ability.