Comparison of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measured by an automated oscillometric apparatus with that by standard hand-held doppler in patients with Type-2 diabetes

The Accuracy and Reliability of Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Comparing the accuracy and reliability of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measured by an oscillometric device with the Doppler method in peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHODS

122 patients admitted to the department of interventional radiology with PAD were studied. ABI was measured with the 2 methods in random order. After excluding the inconclusive results, Doppler ABIs were compared with the oscillometric ABIs in each limb, the reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the accuracy and consistency were assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves and Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

In 122 patients (244 legs), 27 legs got inconclusive oscillometric results, 4 legs got inconclusive oscillometric and inconclusive dorsalis pedis artery Doppler results, 2 legs had oscillometric cuff pressure intolerance. Using Doppler ABI <0.9 as a diagnostic threshold, compared with the high Doppler ABI, oscillometric method had a sensitivity of 57.81%, a specificity of 95.18%, the ICC was 0.626 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.536-0.701), Bland-Altman method showed 11/211 (5.21%) difference points outside the 95% limits of agreement. Compared with the low Doppler ABI, oscillometric method had a sensitivity of 50.66%, a specificity of 98.31%, the ICC was 0.541(95% CI: 0.483-0.630), Bland-Altman method showed 11/211 (5.21%) difference points outside the 95% limits of agreement. Using 1.00 as the diagnostic threshold and considering error oscillometric results as abnormal ABIs, the sensitivity improved to 88.05% with high Doppler ABI and 81.42% with the low.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy and reliability of oscillometric ABI in patients with PAD is unsatisfied, which makes it not suitable as an alternative method in clinic disease assessment. Using 1.0 as the ABI oscillometric threshold for PAD diagnosis can improve the diagnostic value.

Assessing Automatic Plethysmographic Ankle-Brachial Index Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease Detection: A Comparative Study with Doppler Ankle-Brachial Index Measurements

BACKGROUND The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a critical diagnostic test for peripheral artery disease (PAD), albeit requiring technical expertise and dedicated resources. The advent of automatic ABI devices proposes a more accessible approach, necessitating fewer resources and less expertise. This study was conducted to gather data on PAD prevalence and to evaluate the correlation and efficacy of automatic ABI measurements vs traditional Doppler ABI measurements to understand their potential role in primary care settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS ABI measurements were obtained using both the Doppler method and an automatic plethysmographic device (Dopplex ABility, Huntleigh Healthcare). RESULTS Of the 290 participants (mean age 67.6±7.4 years), Doppler ABI method identified 16.8% with abnormal results (<0.9), while the automatic method identified only 5.9%. The mean Doppler ABI was 1.05±0.15, and the mean automatic ABI was 1.12±0.13. The sensitivity of the automatic ABI measurements was 22.2%, and the specificity was 96.8%, with a positive predictive value of 57.1%, and a negative predictive value of 86.9%. Adjustments in the automatic assessment and inclusion of pulse wave velocity enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of the automatic ABI device. CONCLUSIONS While the automatic plethysmographic ABI device may lack the necessary diagnostic capabilities to replace the traditional Doppler ABI device as a standalone test in PAD diagnosis, it could still offer significant value in primary care settings if integrated with adjusted cut-off points and pulse wave velocity analysis.

Four Decades of Foot and Ankle Research Activity: A Scientometric study of Subspecialty Foot and Ankle Journals

Objectives

To evaluate foot and ankle documents using scientometric methods and provide insight into global research activities.

Methods

This scientometric study was conducted at the Department of Spine Surgery, Ganzhou People's Hospital, China. Documents on foot and ankle from 1980 to 2019 were retrieved from the Scopus database. The number of documents, year of publication, journal, country, institution, author, h-index, and top-cited documents were analyzed.

Results

In total, 11313 documents were retrieved. The annual research output on foot and ankle showed a dramatic increase over the past four decades, especially in the past decade (p = 0.000). Foot & Ankle International published the biggest number of documents (44.48%). The United States contributed more than half (52.17%) of the global production, followed by the United Kingdom (11.39%), and Germany (3.62%). The United States had the highest h-index (109). The Hospital for Special Surgery (1.87%) ranked first in terms of productivity, followed by Union Memorial Hospital (1.37%), and Duke University Medical Center (1.24%). The most productive author was Myerson MS (1.25%), followed by Schon LC (0.77%), and Hyer CF (0.74%).

Conclusion

Research on foot and ankle has thrived rapidly over the past four decades, particularly in the last decade. The United States contributes the most to the quantity and quality of foot and ankle documents.

Electrical stimulation to regain lower extremity muscle perfusion and endurance in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2: A randomized controlled trial

Muscle deconditioning and impaired vascular function in the lower extremities (LE) are among the long-term symptoms experienced by COVID-19 patients with a history of severe illness. These symptoms are part of the post-acute sequelae of Sars-CoV-2 (PASC) and currently lack evidence-based treatment. To investigate the efficacy of lower extremity electrical stimulation (E-Stim) in addressing PASC-related muscle deconditioning, we conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eighteen (n = 18) patients with LE muscle deconditioning were randomly assigned to either the intervention (IG) or the control (CG) group, resulting in 36 LE being assessed. Both groups received daily 1 h E-Stim on both gastrocnemius muscles for 4 weeks, with the device functional in the IG and nonfunctional in the CG. Changes in plantar oxyhemoglobin (OxyHb) and gastrocnemius muscle endurance (GNMe) in response to 4 weeks of daily 1 h E-Stim were assessed. At each study visit, outcomes were measured at onset (t₀ ), 60 min (t₆₀ ), and 10 min after E-Stim therapy (t₇₀ ) by recording ΔOxyHb with near-infrared spectroscopy. ΔGNMe was measured with surface electromyography at two time intervals: 0-5 min (Intv₁ ) and: 55-60 min (Intv₂ ). Baseline OxyHb decreased in both groups at t₆₀ (IG: p = 0.046; CG: p = 0.026) and t₇₀ (IG = p = 0.021; CG: p = 0.060) from t₀ . At 4 weeks, the IG's OxyHb increased from t₆₀ to t₇₀ (p < 0.001), while the CG's decreased (p = 0.003). The IG had higher ΔOxyHb values than the CG at t₇₀ (p = 0.004). Baseline GNMe did not increase in either group from Intv₁ to Intv₂ . At 4 weeks, the IG's GNMe increased (p = 0.031), whereas the CG did not change. There was a significant association between ΔOxyHb and ΔGNMe (r = 0.628, p = 0.003) at 4 weeks in the IG. In conclusion, E-Stim can improve muscle perfusion and muscle endurance in individuals with PASC experiencing LE muscle deconditioning.

Safety and efficacy of electrical stimulation for lower-extremity muscle weakness in intensive care unit 2019 Novel Coronavirus patients: A phase I double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Background

Intensive care unit (ICU) prolonged immobilization may lead to lower-extremity muscle deconditioning among critically ill patients, particularly more accentuated in those with 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection. Electrical stimulation (E-Stim) is known to improve musculoskeletal outcomes. This phase I double-blinded randomized controlled trial examined the safety and efficacy of lower-extremity E-Stim to prevent muscle deconditioning.

Methods

Critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU were randomly assigned to control (CG) or intervention (IG) groups. Both groups received daily E-Stim (1 h) for up to 14 days on both gastrocnemius muscles (GNMs). The device was functional in the IG and non-functional in the CG. Primary outcomes included ankle strength (Ankle_s) measured by an ankle-dynamometer, and GNM endurance (GNM_e) in response to E-Stim assessed with surface electromyography (sEMG). Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 and 9 days.

Results

Thirty-two (IG = 16, CG = 16) lower extremities in 16 patients were independently assessed. The mean time between ICU admission and E-Stim therapy delivery was 1.8 ± 1.9 days (p = 0.29). At 3 days, the IG showed an improvement compared to the CG with medium effect sizes for Ankle_s (p = 0.06, Cohen's d = 0.77) and GNM_e (p = 0.06, d = 0.69). At 9 days, the IG GNM_e was significantly higher than the CG (p = 0.04, d = 0.97) with a 6.3% improvement from baseline (p = 0.029). E-Stim did not alter vital signs (i.e., heart/respiratory rate, blood saturation of oxygen), showed no adverse events (i.e., pain, skin damage, discomfort), nor interfere with ICU standard of care procedures (i.e., mechanical ventilation, prone rotation).

Conclusion

This study supports the safety and efficacy of early E-Stim therapy to potentially prevent deterioration of lower-extremity muscle conditions in critically ill COVID-19 patients recently admitted to the ICU. If confirmed in a larger sample, E-Stim may be used as a practical adjunctive therapy.

Clinical trial registration

[https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [NCT04685213].

Automated Measurements of Ankle-Brachial Index: A Narrative Review

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic disease that causes obstruction in lower limb arteries. It increases cardiovascular risk even in asymptomatic patients. Accurate diagnostic tools for identification of affected individuals are needed. Recently, there have been attempts to establish a reliable method of automated ankle-brachial index (ABI) identification. A search of PubMed database to identify studies assessing automatic ABI measurements in agreement with standard PAD diagnosis methods was conducted in December 2020. A total of 57 studies were analyzed in the review. The majority of analyzed studies found ABI measured by automatic oscillometric devices to be potentially feasible for use. Some note that, even though the Doppler and oscillometric methods are not fully interchangeable, the oscillometric devices could be used in screening. Significantly fewer publications are available on automatic plethysmographic devices. For photoplethysmography, most studies reported either good or moderate agreement with reference standards. For air plethysmography, poorer agreement with Doppler ABI is suggested. It is noted that pulse volume recording (PVR) function may improve the diagnostic accuracy of the devices.