1
|
Sperling D. "People aren't happy to see refugees coming to Switzerland. They don't like assisted suicide for foreigners": Organizations' perspectives regarding the right-to-die and suicide tourism. DEATH STUDIES 2024:1-15. [PMID: 38602817 DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2024.2337209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
The practice of suicide tourism refers to the traveling of individuals to other countries to seek legally permitted assisted suicide. This study employed a descriptive qualitative research approach exploring how right-to-die organizations perceive suicide tourism and its implications on the right-to-die. Five themes emerged following the analysis of 12 in-depth interviews with activists from right-to-die organizations and 13 relevant documents: (1) unequivocal attitudes toward suicide tourism; (2) relationships between the organizations and the media; (3) acting to change the legal status of the right-to-die; (4) the role of the family in interactions between the organization and the person seeking assistance; and (5) reciprocal relations between the organizations and the physicians. The findings reveal ambivalent attitudes within such organizations toward suicide tourism, inherent tension among participating physicians, and complex relationships between assisted suicide, palliative care, and the physicians' duty to promote individual choice at end-of-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sperling
- Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- Head, Master's Program in Nursing, The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Öhlén J, Böling S, HamdanAlshehri H, Brännström M, Henoch I, Hessman E, Nilsson S, Ozanne A. Strategies for knowledge translation of a palliative approach outside specialized palliative care services: a scoping review. Palliat Care 2022; 21:39. [PMID: 35317795 PMCID: PMC8939083 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00929-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Research suggests palliative care to be translated and integrated in non-specialized palliative care services throughout the palliative care continuum across populations and settings. A need has been identified to build on the existing research literature in order to design strong knowledge translation strategies that can be evaluated in future research. The aim was to map strategies for knowledge translation of a palliative approach to care into non-specialized palliative care services for adult patients. The objectives were to explore the primary research activities, the specific type of knowledge translation strategies used, the research designs and study settings for such evaluations along with the major results thereof, and to identify major research gaps in this area. Methods A scoping review was performed to map the volume and characteristics of research literature (project registered in PROSPERO #2018 CRD42018100663). The ten-year period 2010 to 2019 was searched in six major databases for original articles published in English in which the knowledge translation of a palliative approach for adult patients was evaluated in non-specialized palliative healthcare settings, and all type of empirical data-based research designs. We excluded non-English, non-empirical articles, non-evaluation of knowledge translations, specialized palliative care settings, and other types of publications (i.e. non-original articles). Results Most of the 183 included articles focused on patients with cancer who were dying in hospitals and in high income countries. Only 13 articles focused on early palliative care. A palette of different strategies was used to implement palliative care in non-specialist palliative settings; no strategy was identified as outstanding. The majority of the articles had unspecified essential components of the research designs. Conclusion Previous suggestions for utilization of implementation science for knowledge translation of a palliative approach to care into non-specialized palliative care services are confirmed, and established knowledge translation theories can strengthen the field. To advance this specific field of knowledge, meticulously detailed reporting of studies is required as related to research designs, clarifications of contextual influences and mechanisms at work. Specific systematic reviews and meta-syntheses in the field are merited. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00929-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joakim Öhlén
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences and Centre for Person-Centred Care, and Palliative Centre at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Susanna Böling
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Hanan HamdanAlshehri
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Princess Nourah, Bint Abdulrahman University, Medical-Surgical Department of Nursing College, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ingela Henoch
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Hessman
- University of Gothenburg, Biomedical Library, Gothenburg University Library, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Stefan Nilsson
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences and University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anneli Ozanne
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, and Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark D, Inbadas H, Seymour J. International transfer and translation of an end of life care intervention: the case of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5:256. [PMID: 33344784 PMCID: PMC7726848 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16321.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We explore how and why the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) for the dying patient was transferred to 20 countries beyond the UK, and with what consequences for policy and practice. Our paper synthesises findings from 95 publications contained in a historical narrative literature review on the implementation of the LCP outside the United Kingdom, alongside data from 18 qualitative interviews with 19 key actors involved with the LCP in 14 countries. We use the review to explore the timelines and patterns of development and implementation in the specific countries, to consider what forms of research and evaluation about the LCP were undertaken to establish its effectiveness, and to summarise the resulting findings and their consequences. We use the interviews to gain insights into the elements, processes and dynamics that shaped the transfer and translation of the LCP from one location to another, across national boundaries. Using six questions from the policy transfer literature we then explain who were the key actors involved; what was transferred; from where lessons were drawn; the different degrees of transfer that took place; what restricted or facilitated transfer; and how transfer was related to 'success' or 'failure'. We conclude that the spread of the LCP took place mostly in prosperous countries, and was sustained over around 15 years. It took in differing geographies and cultures, and a variety of linguistic, policy and practice contexts. If it did not succeed in a wider transformational goal, it appears to have been well received and perceived as beneficial in many contexts, largely avoiding accusations of mis-use and harm that had occurred in the UK, and in some cases fostering a sustained international collaboration and ongoing use of local variants, even after withdrawal in its country of origin in 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Clark
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Glasgow, Dumfries, DG2 0XY, UK
| | - Hamilton Inbadas
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Glasgow, Dumfries, DG2 0XY, UK
| | - Jane Seymour
- Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2HQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wegleitner K, Schuchter P, Prieth S. 'Ingredients' of a supportive web of caring relationships at the end of life: findings from a community research project in Austria. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2020; 42:987-1000. [PMID: 29700832 PMCID: PMC7379933 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In accordance with the pluralisation of life plans in late modernity, the societal organisation of care at the end of life is diverse. Although the public discourse in western societies is dominated by questions about optimising specialised palliative care services, public health approaches, which take into account the social determinants and inequalities in end-of-life care, have gained in importance over the last decade. Conceptual aspects, dimensions of impact and benefit for the dying and their communities are well discussed in the public health end-of-life care research literature. Our research focuses on the preconditions of a supportive caring web in order to understand how communities can build on their social capital to deal with existential uncertainty. As part of a large-scale community research project, we carried out focus groups and interviews with community members. Through dispositive analysis, we generated a set of care-web 'ingredients', which constitute and foster a caring community. These 'ingredients' need to be cultivated through an ongoing process of co-creation. This requires: (i) a focus on relationships and social systems; (ii) the creation of reflective spaces; and (iii) the strengthening of social capital, and d) the addressing of inequalities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Wegleitner
- Department for Palliative Care and Organisational EthicsInstitute of Pastoral TheologyUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Patrick Schuchter
- Institute of Palliative Care and Organisational EthicsUniversity of KlagenfurtViennaAustria
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Whitelaw S, Clark D. Palliative care and public health: an asymmetrical relationship? Palliat Care 2019; 12:1178224218819745. [PMID: 30814842 PMCID: PMC6383085 DOI: 10.1177/1178224218819745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Interest in the potential for public health and palliative care to work together is now widely established. Based on a mapping review of existing literature, we describe for the first time the ways in which public health has entered palliative care policy and practice and how this has been specifically articulated. We then go on to pursue analytical and critical lines of enquiry that are largely absent from the existing literature. We do this in three ways: (i) by considering why the link between public health and palliative care has become so ubiquitous within palliative care policy; (ii) by establishing how this has been constructed; and (iii) by exploring public health as a 'reference discipline' from which its 'secondary deployment' can become embedded inside another disciplinary field. From this, we develop a range of critical perspectives on the relationship between public health and palliative care by scrutinising its claims of utility and effectiveness and questioning the strength of the interdisciplinary interaction between the two disciplines. We see their relationship in a 'cross disciplinary' context which is still largely symbolic and tactical in nature. We conclude by considering the significance of these insights for policy and practice, with two possible scenarios. If the use of public health is essentially figurative and its resources are not unique, the particular and exclusive use of the term becomes insignificant. Progressive and effective policy and practice is possible, independent of any explicit public health label. If however public health is considered to have intrinsic and definable worth, we suggest that this currently asymmetrical association needs to be significantly developed with much higher levels of theoretical, practical and critical engagement between the two disciplines. Such work would result in more reflective and robust policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Whitelaw
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University
of Glasgow, Dumfries, UK
| | - David Clark
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University
of Glasgow, Dumfries, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seymour J, Clark D. The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient: a critical analysis of its rise, demise and legacy in England. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:15. [PMID: 29881785 PMCID: PMC5963294 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13940.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient ('LCP') was an integrated care pathway (ICP) recommended by successive governments in England and Wales to improve end-of-life care. It was discontinued in 2014 following mounting criticism and a national review. Understanding the problems encountered in the roll out of the LCP has crucial importance for future policy making in end of life care. We provide an in-depth account of LCP development and implementation with explanatory theoretical perspectives. We address three critical questions: 1) why and how did the LCP come to prominence as a vehicle of policy and practice? 2) what factors contributed to its demise? 3) what immediate implications and lessons resulted from its withdrawal? Methods: We use primary and secondary sources in the public domain to assemble a critical and historical review. We also draw on the 'boundary object' concept and on wider analyses of the use of ICPs. Results: The rapidity of transfer and translation of the LCP reflected uncritical enthusiasm for ICPs in the early 2000s. While the LCP had some weaknesses in its formulation and implementation, it became the bearer of responsibility for all aspects of NHS end-of-life care. It exposed fault lines in the NHS, provided a platform for debates about the 'evidence' required to underpin innovations in palliative care and became a conduit of discord about 'good' or 'bad' practice in care of the dying. It also fostered a previously unseen critique of assumptions within palliative care. Conclusions: In contrast to most observers of the LCP story who refer to the dangers of scaling up clinical interventions without an evidence base, we call for greater assessment of the wider risks and more careful consideration of the unintended consequences that might result from the roll out of new end-of-life interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Seymour
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Barber House, Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield, S10 2LA, UK
| | - David Clark
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Glasgow, Rutherford/ McCowan Building, Dumfries, DG1 4ZL , UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seymour J, Clark D. The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient: a critical analysis of its rise, demise and legacy in England. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:15. [PMID: 29881785 PMCID: PMC5963294 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13940.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient ('the LCP') was an integrated care pathway (ICP) recommended by successive governments in England and Wales to improve end-of-life care, using insights from hospice and palliative care. It was discontinued in 2014 following mounting criticism and a national review. The ensuing debate among clinicians polarised between 'blaming' of the LCP and regret at its removal. Employing the concept of 'boundary objects', we aimed to address three questions: 1) why and how did the LCP come to prominence as a vehicle of policy and practice 2) what factors contributed to its demise? 3) what immediate implications and lessons resulted from its withdrawal? Methods: We use primary and secondary sources in the public domain to assemble a critical and historical review. Results: The rapidity of transfer and translation of the LCP reflected uncritical enthusiasm for ICPs in the early 2000s. The subsequent LCP 'scandal' demonstrated the power of social media in creating knowledge, as well as conflicting perceptions about end-of-life interventions. While the LCP had some weaknesses in its formulation and implementation, it became the bearer of responsibility for all aspects of NHS end-of-life care. This was beyond its original remit. It exposed fault lines in the NHS, provided a platform for debates about the 'evidence' required to underpin innovations in palliative care and became a conduit of discord about 'good' or 'bad' practice in care of the dying. It also fostered a previously unseen critique of assumptions within palliative care. Conclusions: In contrast to most observers of the LCP story who refer to the dangers of scaling up clinical interventions without an evidence base, we call for greater assessment of the wider risks and more careful consideration of the unintended consequences that might result from the roll out of new end-of-life interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Seymour
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Barber House, Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield, S10 2LA, UK
| | - David Clark
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Glasgow, Rutherford/ McCowan Building, Dumfries, DG1 4ZL , UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tieman J, Miller-Lewis L, Rawlings D, Parker D, Sanderson C. The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:31. [PMID: 29458347 PMCID: PMC5819292 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0287-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in medicine have helped many to live longer lives and to be able to meet health challenges. However death rates are anticipated to increase given the ageing population and chronic disease progression. Being able to talk about death is seen to be important in normalising death as part of life and supporting preparedness for death. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provide opportunities for the community to engage in collaborative learning. A 5 week MOOC was developed covering four main topics (language and humour, representations of death, medicalisation of dying, and digital dying) aiming: To enable participants to openly and supportively discuss and learn about issues around living, death and dying, To explore the normally unheard opinions and views of Australians around death and dying, and To determine what effect online learning and discussions offered through the MOOC had on participants' feelings and attitudes towards death and dying. METHODS Data was captured on engagement rates in the various MOOC activities. Death Attitudes were measured by five items representing the MOOC's learning objectives and completed at enrolment and conclusion. MOOC Satisfaction was measured with six items at the end of the MOOC. Descriptive statistics were produced for each variable and Chi-Square Tests of Independence assessed the extent of the relationship between categorical variables. Socio-demographic variables were examined as predictors of the outcome variables of MOOC engagement, MOOC satisfaction, and death attitudes. Ethical approval was received from Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (Project No. 7247). RESULTS One thousand one hundred fifty six people enrolled in the Dying2Learn MOOC with 895 participating in some way. Enrolees were primarily female (92.1%). Age ranged from 16 to 84 (mean = 49.5, SD = 12.3). MOOC satisfaction scores were high. Responses to the experience of participating in the MOOC were very positive, with mean scores ranging from 4.3 to 4.6 (aligning with agreement and strong agreement to statements on the value of participating). Death Attitudes were positive at commencement but increased significantly following participation. CONCLUSIONS The Dying2Learn MOOC provided an environment that enabled open and supportive discussion around death and dying and influenced attitudinal change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Tieman
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Lauren Miller-Lewis
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Deb Rawlings
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Deborah Parker
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 7, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Christine Sanderson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inbadas H. The Philosophical and Cultural Situatedness of Spirituality at the End of Life in India. Indian J Palliat Care 2017; 23:338-340. [PMID: 28827943 PMCID: PMC5545965 DOI: 10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_61_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The sustained interest in exploring the spiritual domain at end of life in the Indian context reflects the recognition of its significance as an integral part of palliative care. A key aspect of findings from studies so far is the identification of challenges, inadequacies, limitations and ethical dilemmas in relation to spirituality at the end of life. India is known for its rich spiritual heritage and has unique ways of understanding, experiencing and expressing spirituality. The philosophical and cultural frames of reference, with which communities in India make sense of life, death and dying, determine the characteristics of Indian spirituality at the end of life. Exploring the concepts of the human person, the purpose of human life, the meaning of death and caring for the dying using Indian philosophical and cultural resources can help address some of the identified limitations and challenges in the Indian context. A cross-disciplinary approach, drawing together expertise from clinical palliative care, philosophy, theology and sociology, will enrich the understanding of spirituality at the end of life and can contribute to effective spiritual care in palliative care in specific contexts around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamilton Inbadas
- School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Dumfries DG1 4ZL, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|