Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the simultaneous quantitation of ceftriaxone, metronidazole and hydroxymetronidazole in plasma from seriously ill, severely malnourished children

A developed and validated centrifugal ultrafiltration coupled with high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for rapid quantification of unbound lenvatinib in human plasma

In clinical practice, the determination of unbound drug concentration is very important for dose adjustment and toxicity prediction because only the unbound fraction can achieve a pharmacological effect. A fast, sensitive and accurate analytical method of centrifugal ultrafiltration coupled with high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and applied to allow the quantification of unbound lenvatinib concentration. The application of linear regression analysis was used to examine the effects of centrifugal force, centrifugal time, and protein content on ultrafiltrate volume (Vu). The results indicated that the centrifugal force and centrifugal time have an influence on Vu that is significantly positive (P < 0.05). This developed method with good linearity (r2 = 0.9996), good accuracy (bias % ≤ 2.24 %), good precision (CV % ≤ 7.10 %), and good recovery (95.46 %-106.46 %) was suitable for routine clinical practice and studies. Particularly, the ultrafiltration membrane had no non-specific binding to lenvatinib. The unbound fractions can be separated in just 15 min. This method was applied to quantify clinical samples and to determine the plasma protein binding and unbound fraction of lenvatinib. This study provides a more effective and promising method for determination of unbound lenvatinib. It could be beneficial to measure the unbound concentration of lenvatinib in personalized medicine and therapeutic drug monitoring in routine clinical practice.

A Review of Methods for Removal of Ceftriaxone from Wastewater

The presence of pharmaceuticals in surface water and wastewater poses a threat to public health and has significant effects on the ecosystem. Since most wastewater treatment plants are ineffective at removing molecules efficiently, some pharmaceuticals enter aquatic ecosystems, thus creating issues such as antibiotic resistance and toxicity. This review summarizes the methods used for the removal of ceftriaxone antibiotics from aquatic environments. Ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in many countries, including Tanzania. Ceftriaxone has been reported to be less or not degraded in traditional wastewater treatment of domestic sewage. This has piqued the interest of researchers in the monitoring and removal of ceftriaxone from wastewater. Its removal from aqueous systems has been studied using a variety of methods which include physical, biological, and chemical processes. As a result, information about ceftriaxone has been gathered from many sources with the searched themes being ceftriaxone in wastewater, ceftriaxone analysis, and ceftriaxone removal or degradation. The methods studied have been highlighted and the opportunities for future research have been described.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Based on Measured versus Predicted Unbound Ceftriaxone Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia: An Observational Cohort Study

The impact of ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic alterations on protein binding and PK/PD target attainment still remains unclear. We evaluated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of unbound ceftriaxone in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Besides, we evaluated the accuracy of predicted vs. measured unbound ceftriaxone concentrations, and its impact on PK/PD target attainment. A prospective observational cohort study was carried out in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe CAP. Ceftriaxone 2 g q24h intermittent infusion was administered to all patients. Successful PK/PD target attainment was defined as unbound trough concentrations above 1 or 4 mg/L throughout the whole dosing interval. Acceptable overall PK/PD target attainment was defined as successful target attainment in ≥90% of all dosing intervals. Measured unbound ceftriaxone concentrations (CEFu) were compared to unbound concentrations predicted from various protein binding models. Thirty-one patients were included. The 1 mg/L and 4 mg/L targets were reached in 26/32 (81%) and 15/32 (47%) trough samples, respectively. Increased renal function was associated with the failure to attain both PK/PD targets. Unbound ceftriaxone concentrations predicted by the protein binding model developed in the present study showed acceptable bias and precision and had no major impact on PK/PD target attainment. We showed suboptimal (i.e., <90%) unbound ceftriaxone PK/PD target attainment when using a standard 2 g q24h dosing regimen in critically ill patients with severe CAP. Renal function was the major driver for the failure to attain the predefined targets, in accordance with results found in general and septic ICU patients. Interestingly, CEFu was reliably predicted from CEFt without major impact on clinical decisions regarding PK/PD target attainment. This suggests that, when carefully selecting a protein binding model, CEFu does not need to be measured. As a result, the turn-around time and cost for ceftriaxone quantification can be substantially reduced.

Prediction of Unbound Ceftriaxone Concentration in Children: Simple Bioanalysis Method and Basic Mathematical Equation

The pharmacological activity of ceftriaxone depends on the unbound concentration. However, direct measurement of unbound concentrations is obstructive, and high individual variability of the unbound fraction of ceftriaxone was shown in children. We aim to evaluate and validate a method to predict unbound ceftriaxone concentrations in pediatric patients. Ninety-five pairs of concentrations (total and unbound) from 92 patients were measured by the bioanalysis method that we developed. The predictive performance of the three equations (empirical in vivo equation, disease-adapted equation, and multiple linear regression equation) was assessed by the mean absolute prediction error (MAPE), the mean prediction error (MPE), the proportions of the prediction error within ±30% (P ₃₀) and ±50% (P ₅₀), and linear regression of predicted versus actual unbound levels (R ²). The average total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were 126.18 ± 81.46 μg/ml and 18.82 ± 21.75 μg/ml, and the unbound fraction varied greatly from 4.75% to 39.97%. The MPE, MAPE, P ₃₀, P ₅₀, and R ² of the empirical in vivo equation, disease equation, and multiple linear equation were 0.17 versus 0.00 versus 0.06, 0.24 versus 0.15 versus 0.27, 63.2% versus 89.5% versus 74.7%, 96.8% versus 97.9% versus 86.3%, and 0.8730 versus 0.9342 versus 0.9315, respectively. The disease-adapted equation showed the best predictive performance. We have developed and validated a bioanalysis method with one-step extraction pretreatment for the determination of total ceftriaxone concentrations, and a prediction equation of the unbound concentration is recommended. The proposed method can facilitate clinical practice and research on unbound ceftriaxone in children. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03113344.).

Dosing of Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole for Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition

Infants and young children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) are treated with empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Parenteral ceftriaxone is currently a second-line agent for invasive infection. Oral metronidazole principally targets small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Children with SAM may have altered drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. Population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone and metronidazole were studied, with the aim of recommending optimal dosing. Eighty-one patients with SAM (aged 2-45 months) provided 234 postdose pharmacokinetic samples for total ceftriaxone, metronidazole, and hydroxymetronidazole. Ceftriaxone protein binding was also measured in 190 of these samples. A three-compartment model adequately described free ceftriaxone, with a Michaelis-Menten model for concentration and albumin-dependent protein binding. A one-compartment model was used for both metronidazole and hydroxymetronidazole, with only 1% of hydroxymetronidazole predicted to be formed during first-pass. Simulations showed 80 mg/kg once daily of ceftriaxone and 12.5 mg/kg twice daily of metronidazole were sufficient to reach therapeutic targets.

Enhanced HPLC-MS/MS method for the quantitative determination of the co-administered drugs ceftriaxone sodium and lidocaine hydrochloride in human plasma following an intramuscular injection and application to a pharmacokinetic study

A sensitive HPLC-MS/MS method was established for the quantification of ceftriaxone sodium (CFT) and lidocaine HCl (LDC) in human plasma utilizing cefixime (CFX) and tadalafil (TDA) as internal standards. The analytes were extracted from human plasma by protein precipitation using acetonitrile. Chromatographic separation was performed on Kinetex C₁₈ (50.0 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) column with methanol-0.01 M ammonium acetate pH 6.4 (70: 30, v/v) as mobile phase. Multiple reaction monitoring involving the transitions 555.10 → 396.20, 235.20 → 86.00, 454.20 → 284.80 and 390.20 → 268.20 was utilized to quantify CFT, LDC, CFX and TDA, respectively, using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer which was operated in positive ion mode. The method revealed linearity in the concentration range of 3.0-300.0 μg/mL for CFT and 3.0-300.0 ng/mL for LDC. The validation of the method was achieved in accordance to the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. A pharmacokinetic study was performed on healthy Egyptian volunteers after intramuscular injection of sterile ceftriaxone sodium (1 g CFT dissolved in 3.5 mL of 1% LDC) after approval from the ethics committee. The pharmacokinetic parameters were: C_max 141.15 ± 39.84 (μg/mL) and 55.02 ± 9.36 (ng/mL); t_max (h) 2.50 ± 0.50 and 1.5 ± 0.50; t_½ (h) 7.30 ± 2.98 and 4.23 ± 1.96; and K_el (h^-1 ) 0.10 ± 0.04 and 0.20 ± 0.13 for CFT and LDC, respectively.