1
|
Nguyen AT, Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Kortsmit K, Brittain AW, Snyder EM, Cohen MA, Zapata LB, Whiteman MK. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024; 73:1-126. [PMID: 39106314 PMCID: PMC11315372 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette T. Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kathryn M. Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Naomi K. Tepper
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anna W. Brittain
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emily M. Snyder
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Megan A. Cohen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren B. Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maura K. Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
FSRH Guideline (March 2023) Intrauterine contraception. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 49:1-142. [PMID: 37188461 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-iuc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
|
3
|
Lahoti A, Yu C, Brar PC, Dalgo A, Gourgari E, Harris R, Kamboj MK, Marks S, Nandagopal R, Page L, Raman V, Reynolds DG, Sarafoglou K, Terrell C, Stanley TL. An endocrine perspective on menstrual suppression for adolescents: achieving good suppression while optimizing bone health. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2021; 34:1355-1369. [PMID: 34388330 DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2020-0539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Suppression of menstruation and/or ovarian function in adolescent girls may be desired for a variety of reasons. Numerous medical options exist. The choice of the appropriate modality for an individual patient depends on several factors based on differences in the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression as well as in their side effect profiles. Adolescence is also a period of bone mass accrual in girls, and several of these modalities may negatively influence peak bone mass. This review focuses on the efficacy of achieving menstrual suppression and the effect on bone health of the various options through an overview of the current literature and also highlights areas in need of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Lahoti
- Pediatric Endocrine Division, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Christine Yu
- Section of Adult and Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Preneet Cheema Brar
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Austin Dalgo
- Center for Bioethics and Health Equity, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Evgenia Gourgari
- Pediatric Endocrinology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rebecca Harris
- Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manmohan K Kamboj
- Section of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Seth Marks
- Section of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital HSC Winnipeg, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Radha Nandagopal
- Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Laura Page
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Danielle G Reynolds
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kyriakie Sarafoglou
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carrie Terrell
- Division of General Obstetrics, Gynecology, Midwifery and Family Planning at the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Takara L Stanley
- Pediatric Endocrine Unit and Metabolism Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Merki-Feld GS, Bitzer J. Contraception in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Is there evidence for a negative impact of combined hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density and the course of the disease? EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2020; 25:213-220. [PMID: 32336145 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1743826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) are at increased risk of unplanned pregnancies and bone loss, due to low oestrogen levels and low use of efficient contraception. The negative impact of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) on peak bone mass during adolescence might limit wider use in anorexic women. Another issue limiting CHC use is the concern, that CHC-induced cyclic bleeding reduces the motivation for further weight gain and thus exerts a negative impact on recovery. We wanted to find evidence based answers about the impact of CHC use on bone health and course of the disease in adolescents with AN.Methods: We performed a narrative review of the current literature investigating the effect of CHC or progestin-only contraceptives on bone density, body shape and course of disease in young women with anorexia.Results: There is no evidence that CHC use aggravates the bone loss associated with AN. In long-term users CHC exert a protective effect. Anorexic women using CHC showed at least the same or a greater weight gain in comparison with controls. Eating disorder attitudes did not worsen.Conclusion: We conclude, that at present there is no evidence, that use of CHC by AN patients has a negative impact on bone density or the course of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johannes Bitzer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Oral Contraceptive, Intrauterine Device Use, and Fracture Risk. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134:581-589. [DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
6
|
Lambert M, Begon E, Hocké C. [Contraception for women after 40: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2018; 46:865-872. [PMID: 30424983 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Choosing contraception for women over 40 can be sometimes difficult but it is crucial since fertility and pregnancy's risks still exist. It requires a thorough evaluation of the situation, in order to identify any vascular and metabolic risk factors, along with the uterine and mammary benign pathologies already diagnosed. OBJECTIVE The objective of this review was to elaborate some guidelines for clinical practice regarding contraception's prescription for women over 40. METHODS A systematic review of the French and English existing literature was conducted. Pubmed and the Cochrane library were used to identify studies about contraception for perimenopausal women. International guidelines published by scientific societies were also reviewed (RCOG, FSRH, ESHRE, ACOG, WHO, HAS). RESULTS No contraceptive methods are contraindicated on the sole basis of age alone. However, because age is a risk factor for vascular and metabolic diseases, combined hormonal contraception and DMPA should not be prescribed at first intention. Copper IUD and progestin-only contraceptives (pill, implant, intrauterine device) should primarily be considered, since they offer good efficacy with lower risks. CONCLUSIONS Contraception for women over 40 should not be put aside. Long acting reversible contraception and progestin-only pill have to be prescribed as first-ine. Contraception is no longer needed for women over 50 who use non-hormonal contraception, after a 12 month-amenorrhea. Patients treated with combined hormonal contraception must stop using it over 50. Measuring hormonal levels while using hormonal contraception is not recommended. An hormonal-contraception-free interval must be considered, while using barrier contraception method. If an ovarian activity persists, a non-hormonal contraception or progestin-only contraception (except for DMPA) should be (re-)established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lambert
- Service de gynécologie et de médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
| | - E Begon
- Service de gynécologie et de médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - C Hocké
- Service de gynécologie et de médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Gordon CM, Zemel BS, Wren TAL, Leonard MB, Bachrach LK, Rauch F, Gilsanz V, Rosen CJ, Winer KK. The Determinants of Peak Bone Mass. J Pediatr 2017; 180:261-269. [PMID: 27816219 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Revised: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Gordon
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
| | - Babette S Zemel
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Tishya A L Wren
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Frank Rauch
- Shriners Hospital for Children, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Vicente Gilsanz
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Karen K Winer
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jain V, Wotring VE. Medically induced amenorrhea in female astronauts. NPJ Microgravity 2016; 2:16008. [PMID: 28725726 PMCID: PMC5516549 DOI: 10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Revised: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Medically induced amenorrhea can be achieved through alterations in the normal regulatory hormones via the adoption of a therapeutic agent, which prevents menstrual flow. Spaceflight-related advantages for medically induced amenorrhea differ according to the time point in the astronaut's training schedule. Pregnancy is contraindicated for many pre-flight training activities as well as spaceflight, therefore effective contraception is essential. In addition, the practicalities of menstruating during pre-flight training or spaceflight can be challenging. During long-duration missions, female astronauts have often continuously taken the combined oral contraceptive pill to induce amenorrhea. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are safe and reliable methods used to medically induce amenorrhea terrestrially but as of yet, not extensively used by female astronauts. If LARCs were used, daily compliance with an oral pill is not required and no upmass or trash would need disposal. Military studies have shown that high proportions of female personnel desire amenorrhea during deployment; better education has been recommended at recruitment to improve uptake and autonomous decision-making. Astronauts are exposed to similar austere conditions as military personnel and parallels can be drawn with these results. Offering female astronauts up-to-date, evidence-based, comprehensive education, in view of the environment in which they work, would empower them to make informed decisions regarding menstrual suppression while respecting their autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varsha Jain
- National Institute for Health Research, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
- Queen Mary's University, London, UK
- Center for Space Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Virginia E Wotring
- Center for Space Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|