Biomarkers of gene expression: growth factors and oncoproteins

Acrylonitrile exposure: the effect on p53 and p21(WAF1) protein levels in the blood plasma of occupationally exposed workers and in vitro in human diploid lung fibroblasts

Acrylonitrile (ACN) is a compound widely used in the synthesis of a variety of organic products. It has been found that ACN is carcinogenic in rats, and some epidemiological studies also suggest a possible carcinogenic effect of ACN in humans. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of ACN exposure on the expression of p53 and p21(WAF1) proteins in vitro as well as in vivo. In vitro ACN exposure of human lung fibroblasts resulted in the induction of both p53 and p21(WAF1) proteins. To evaluate the effect of ACN on the levels of p53 and p21(WAF1) proteins in the blood plasma of ACN-exposed workers, samples from 49 subjects (average age 44 years, 88% males, 12% females) exposed to ACN in the petrochemical industry (ACN concentration ranged from 0.05 to 0.3mg/m(3)) were analyzed. Subjects living in the same area (N=24, average age 43 years, 92% males, 8% females), but not working in the petrochemical industry were used as controls. No significant differences in either p53, or p21(WAF1) levels between the exposed and control groups were found. The expression of p53 was significantly higher in exposed non-smokers as compared with smokers (P=0.02). No effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes on the expression of either protein was observed. Subjects with an EPHX high activity genotype had significantly higher p21(WAF1) expression as compared with genotypes with low or medium EPHX activity. We conclude that plasma levels of both proteins are not relevant biomarkers for occupational ACN exposure.

Use of biomarkers in risk assessment

The systematic development and application of biomarkers in environmental health risk assessment is a relatively new field. At first, the major interest was in biomarkers of exposure, borrowing concepts from pharmacology, then it moved from the external estimates of exposure to internal measures of dose, and ultimately, to markers of target dose. While these markers provide evidence of exposures, they do not provide evidence of that toxicological damage has occurred. For this reason, measurements of DNA adducts and protein adducts are of interest, since they may provide bridges between exposures and disease end-points. In parallel, more quantitative and more sensitive end-points for diseases have been sought. Again, with advancing techniques in cytogenetics, extensive studies were conducted on such markers as chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and other changes deemed to represent genomic damage. However, these types of end-points are quite unspecific for application to new hazards of uncertain human toxic (carcinogenic) potential. Recent work focusing on more specific early-effect markers such as certain oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes have substantial promise as shown by work with aflatoxins and vinyl chloride. Such studies have also enhanced mechanistic insight. The advances in molecular genetics have led to an upsurge in interest in most susceptibility factors, and identification of polymorphisms of various enzymes has become possible. Ongoing search for "ultra-high risk" individuals may be fruitful, but probably only relevant to a small segment of potentially exposed populations. Factors associated with a small differential risk, however theoretically or mechanistically important, offer only little practical use.

Functional foods: the US perspective

Widespread interest in the possibility that selected foods might promote health has resulted in the coining of the term functional food, although agreement about what is and what is not a functional food is lacking. Public interest in functional foods is increasing because of higher health care costs; the passage of federal legislation affecting many food categories, including the expanded category of dietary supplements; and recent scientific discoveries linking dietary habits with the development of many diseases, including coronary heart disease and some cancers. A variety of foods have been proposed as providing health benefits by altering one or more physiologic processes. Biomarkers are needed to assess the ability of functional foods or their bioactive components to modify disease and to evaluate the ability of these foods to promote health, growth, and well-being. Evidence suggests that several biomarkers may be useful for distinguishing between diseased and nondiseased states and even for predicting future susceptibility to disease. A variety of biomarkers will probably be needed to develop a profile for an individual that reflects the impact of diet on performance and health. Another area of interest is the interaction of nutrients and their association with genetics. These interactions may account for the inconsistent interrelations observed between specific dietary constituents and the incidence of disease. Greater understanding of how diet influences a person's genetic potential, overall performance, and susceptibility to disease can have enormous implications for society. As new discoveries are made in this area, consumers will need access to this information so that they can make informed decisions.

Use of biomarkers--new frontiers in occupational toxicology and epidemiology

The incorporation of biomarkers into occupational toxicology and epidemiology some 25 years ago marked a turning-point for the discipline. The advances in molecular biology have provided new tools. At first, the major interest was in biomarkers of exposure, borrowing concepts from pharmacology, then it moved from the external estimates of exposure to internal measures of dose, and ultimately, to markers of target dose. Concerted efforts to measure carcinogens at the molecular level, e.g. DNA adducts, occupied a substantial fraction of the biomarkers work. In parallel, more quantitative and more sensitive end-points for etiological studies were sought earlier. Again, with advancing techniques in cytogenetics, extensive studies were conducted on such markers as sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), micronuclei and other changes deemed to represent genomic damage. However, these types of end-points were quite unspecific for application to new hazards of uncertain human carcinogenic potential. Recent work focusing on more specific early-effect markers such as certain oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes have substantial promise as shown by work with aflatoxins and vinyl chloride. Such studies have also enhanced mechanistic insight. The advances in molecular genetics have led to an upsurge in interest in most susceptibility factors, and identification of polymorphisms of various enzymes has become possible. Ongoing search for 'ultra-high risk' individuals may be fruitful, but probably only relevant to a small segment of potentially exposed populations. Factors associated with a small differential risk, however theoretically or mechanistically important, offer only little practical use.

12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards

The 12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC) considered the topic of methodologies for determining human and ecosystem susceptibility to environmental hazards. The report prepared at the meeting describes measurement of susceptibility through the use of biological markers of exposure, biological markers of effect, and biomarkers directly indicative of susceptibility of humans or of ecosystems. The utility and validity of these biological markers for the study of susceptibility are evaluated, as are opportunities for developing newer approaches for the study of humans or of ecosystems. For the first time a SGOMSEC workshop also formally considered the issue of ethics in relation to methodology, an issue of particular concern for studies of susceptibility.

12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards

The 12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC) considered the topic of methodologies for determining human and ecosystem susceptibility to environmental hazards. The report prepared at the meeting describes measurement of susceptibility through the use of biological markers of exposure, biological markers of effect, and biomarkers directly indicative of susceptibility of humans or of ecosystems. The utility and validity of these biological markers for the study of susceptibility are evaluated, as are opportunities for developing newer approaches for the study of humans or of ecosystems. For the first time a SGOMSEC workshop also formally considered the issue of ethics in relation to methodology, an issue of particular concern for studies of susceptibility.