Telmisartan but not candesartan affects adiponectin expression in vivo and in vitro

An insight into the role of telmisartan as PPAR-γ/α dual activator in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common hepatic disease. It is rapidly emerging as the frequent cause for liver transplantation with the risk of disease recurrence, even after transplantation. Clinical evidence showed an abnormally altered expression of different peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) isotypes (PPAR-α/γ/δ) in NAFLD with an involvement in the induction of insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, and hepatic inflammation. Recently, several dual PPAR-γ/α agonists were developed to simultaneously achieve the insulin-sensitizing effect of PPAR-γ as well as lipid catabolizing effect of PPAR-α. PPAR-α activation could counterbalance the steatogenic and adipogenic effects of PPAR-γ. But most of the drugs were ended in the initial level itself due to harmful adverse effects. In the present review, we discuss the possible mechanism of telmisartan, a typical angiotensin receptor blocker with excellent safety and pharmacokinetic profile, as a PPAR-γ/α dual agonist in the treatment of NAFLD.

Comparative Study of the Effects of Azilsartan and Telmisartan on Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Biomarkers in Essential Hypertension Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction

The complex interplay between the autonomic nervous system, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and immunity contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension in diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of azilsartan and telmisartan on insulin resistance and metabolic biomarkers in patients with both hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

The present study was a prospective, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients with grade I or II essential hypertension with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized into two groups of 25 patients each. Baseline evaluation of homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), plasma glucose, insulin, leptin and adiponectin levels, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) of patients was done. Patients were reassessed after 12 weeks of drug therapy with azilsartan 40 mg OD (once daily) or telmisartan 40 mg OD.

Results

The mean changes in HOMA-IR from the baseline at the end of 12 weeks of treatment were 0.15 (−0.64, 0.94.52) in the azilsartan group and 0.32 (−0.61, 1.26) in the telmisartan group. The mean difference in the changes from the baseline in HOMA-IR between the two groups was 0.3 (−0.87, 1.48), which was not statistically significant. No statistically significant changes were observed between the two groups in metabolic biomarkers (leptin: -0.84, CI: -4.83 to 3.14, and adiponectin: -0.12, CI: -0.62 to 0.37). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) decreased at the end of the 12-week treatment in both the groups; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (SBP: -2.6, CI: -10.35 to 5.1, and DBP: -3.0, CI: -7.7 to 1.7).

Conclusion

Neither azilsartan nor telmisartan had any significant effects on insulin resistance and metabolic biomarkers after 12 weeks of drug therapy in hypertension patients associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, they showed a comparable antihypertensive effect. The adverse effects observed were mild in nature, and their incidence was comparable between the two groups.

Effects of Telmisartan and Candesartan on the Metabolism of Lipids and Glucose in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Crossover Study

Background

The risk of cardiovascular events remains after kidney transplantation (KT). Abnormal glucose metabolism and hyperlipidemia contribute partly to this risk. Among angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers, telmisartan alone has been shown to ameliorate these effects on glucose and lipid metabolism (GLM). We investigated the effects of telmisartan on GLM in KT patients.

Methods

This trial had a crossover design. Forty-six KT patients with well-controlled hypertension under angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers were randomized into telmisartan and candesartan groups. After a 12-week treatment, crossover was initiated, and additional 12-week treatment was administered without a washout period. We examined the laboratory parameters of GLM, blood pressure and graft function before and after each treatment period.

Results

Forty patients completed the scheduled treatment regimen. Serum levels of triglyceride were significantly lower (114.3 ± 50.8 mg/dL vs 136.5 ± 66.8 mg/dL; P = 0.019), and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher (50.4 ± 15.1 mL/min per 1.73 m² vs 48.5 ± 12.5 mL/min per 1.73 m²; P = 0.038) after telmisartan treatment than after candesartan treatment. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups with regard to the other parameters studied (including serum adiponectin levels and parameters of glucose metabolism).

Conclusions

These data suggest that telmisartan can improve serum triglyceride levels and graft function for KT patients better than candesartan.

A Meta-analysis of antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus candesartan in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The comparison of antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and candesartan in patients with essential hypertension has been investigated in several small studies. The results were not consistent. We performed this meta-analysis determining the antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus candesartan in these patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for all published studies comparing the antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and candesartan in patients with essential hypertension.

RESULTS

The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 302 patients included in 4 trials with a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 weeks. There were no significant differences between telmisartan and candesartan in reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with essential hypertension (weighted mean differences (WMD) for SBP 1.98 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.53, 4.49), p > 0.05; WMD for DBP 0.26 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.65, 2.16), p > 0.05), respectively. In a sub-analysis including 2 randomized studies, there was not a significant difference for the reduction of SBP (WMD 0.90 (95% CI, -2.88, 4.68) mm Hg, p > 0.05) or DBP (WMD -0.80 (95% CI, -3.40, 1.81) mm Hg, p > 0.05) treated with telmisartan or candesartan.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides the evidence that the antihypertensive effects of telmisartan and candesartan are similar on SBP and DBP reduction in patients with essential hypertension, suggesting that strict designed randomized controlled trial would be helpful to compare antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and improve the choice of ARBs in antihypertensive therapy.

Effects of telmisartan on improving leptin resistance and inhibiting hepatic fibrosis in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

The present study aimed to investigate the impacts of telmisartan (TEL) on hepatic fibrosis, serum leptin, leptin protein in liver tissue and its mRNA expression level in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into the control (N), model (M), polyene phosphatidylcholine (P) and TEL (T) groups. Group M and the intervention groups were given a high-fat diet for 12 weeks to induce NAFLD, followed by 4 weeks of intragastric administration of normal saline (1.0 ml/kg/day), polyene phosphatidylcholine (PPC; 123.1 mg/kg/day) and TEL (8 mg/kg/day). The liver tissue was then assessed for the NAFLD activity score and fibrosis score (FS), and serum biochemistry and leptin levels were determined. Additionally, leptin protein expression levels were examined by western blotting and the expression of leptin mRNA was investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. TEL significantly improved FS in rats (P<0.01) and was more effective than PPC. TEL significantly reduced the expression of serum leptin, as well as the expression levels of leptin protein and its mRNA in liver tissue (P<0.01); however, the effects of PPC were not significant (P>0.05). TEL reduced serum leptin, leptin protein and its mRNA in the liver tissue of NAFLD rats, and improved the pathological indicators of liver fibrosis.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models of vascular, cardiac, metabolic and renal disease

We have reviewed the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) in various animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiac function, hypertrophy and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and renal function and morphology. Those of azilsartan and telmisartan have been included comprehensively whereas those of other ARBs have been included systematically but without intention of completeness. ARBs as a class lower blood pressure in established hypertension and prevent hypertension development in all applicable animal models except those with a markedly suppressed renin-angiotensin system; blood pressure lowering even persists for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment. This translates into a reduced mortality, particularly in models exhibiting marked hypertension. The retrieved data on vascular, cardiac and renal function and morphology as well as on glucose and lipid metabolism are discussed to address three main questions: 1. Can ARB effects on blood vessels, heart, kidney and metabolic function be explained by blood pressure lowering alone or are they additionally directly related to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system? 2. Are they shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, e.g. angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? 3. Are some effects specific for one or more compounds within the ARB class? Taken together these data profile ARBs as a drug class with unique properties that have beneficial effects far beyond those on blood pressure reduction and, in some cases distinct from those of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The clinical relevance of angiotensin receptor-independent effects of some ARBs remains to be determined.

A meta-analysis of randomized trials of telmisartan versus active controls for insulin resistance in hypertensive patients

To determine whether telmisartan improves insulin resistance compared with other antihypertensive drugs, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of telmisartan. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through December 2013. Eligible studies were prospective RCTs of telmisartan versus other antihypertensive drugs, enrolling individuals with hypertension and reporting insulin levels and/or homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) as outcomes. Of 67 potentially relevant articles screened initially, 33 reports of RCTs enrolling a total of 2033 patients with hypertension were identified and included. Pooled analyses of only the eight double-blind-design trials demonstrated statistically significant reductions in percent changes of insulin levels (mean difference, -5.19%; 95% confidence interval, -8.94% to -1.43%; P = .007) and HOMA-IR (-15.34%; -26.39% to -4.28%; P = .007) with telmisartan relative to other antihypertensive drugs. When data from all the 33 trials were pooled, telmisartan was associated with statistically significant reductions in percent changes of insulin levels (-10.92%; -15.60% to -6.23%; P < .00001) and HOMA-IR (-15.89%; -22.01% to -9.78%; P < .00001) relative to other antihypertensive drugs. In conclusion, telmisartan appears to significantly improve insulin resistance compared with other antihypertensive drugs in patients with hypertension.

Telmisartan at 80 mg/day increases high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels and improves insulin resistance in diabetic patients

INTRODUCTION

The clinical dose of telmisartan necessary for activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) has not been established. The authors investigated the effect of high-dose telmisartan on serum levels of the high-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin in patients with diabetes and hypertension.

METHODS

In this open-label, prospective, randomized study, patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension with poor control of blood pressure by 40 mg/day telmisartan were randomly assigned into the telmisartan 80 mg/day (Tel80) group (dose increase from 40 to 80 mg/day) or the telmisartan 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg (Tel40 + Aml5) group. Serum levels of HMW adiponectin and parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism were measured at baseline and end of 3-months of treatment.

RESULTS

Although the antihypertensive effects of the two doses of telmisartan were similar, a significant increase in HMW adiponectin levels was noted only in the Tel80 group. The increase was evident particularly in a group of patients whose HMW adiponectin levels were less than 4.0 μg/dL. A significant improvement in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), a measure of insulin resistance, was also observed in the Tel80 group only.

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients with hypertension, high-dose telmisartan increased HMW adiponectin levels and improved insulin resistance through activation of PPAR-gamma.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of irbesartan and olmesartan in patients with hypertension (EARTH study)

Fifty-four patients were randomly divided into irbesartan and olmesartan groups. Blood pressure (BP) was significantly decreased in all patients at 12 weeks. In particular, BP in patients who initially received irbesartan showed significant reductions. The equality of variance of BP in the irbesartan group was significantly smaller than that in the olmesartan group at 12 weeks. Blood concentrations of adiponectin were significantly increased in the irbesartan group at 12 weeks. Log [pentraxin-3] in the irbesartan group were significantly decreased. In conclusion, the ability of irbesartan to reduce BP is comparable to that of olmesartan with equivalent safety.

Improved insulin sensitivity after long-term treatment with AT1 blockers is not associated with PPARγ target gene regulation

In both cell culture experiments and in vivo studies, a number of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists activated the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ). This mechanism has been discussed to be, at least in part, responsible for the improvement in glucose metabolism observed in animal studies and clinical trials. To investigate whether the PPARγ-dependent mechanism may represent a valid target for chronic therapy, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were fed either with a cafeteria diet (CD) or standard chow. CD-fed SHR were simultaneously treated with either telmisartan (TEL; 8 mg/kg(body weight)· d) or candesartan (CAND; 10 mg/kg(body weight)· d) for 3 months because TEL, but not CAND, has been demonstrated to be a strong activator of PPARγ. After 3 months, chow- and CD-fed controls were hypertensive, whereas TEL and CAND treatment resulted in normalized blood pressures in SHR. Body weight and the amount of abdominal fat (determined by magnetic resonance imaging) were higher in CD- than in chow-fed SHR. After TEL or CAND, body weight, abdominal fat quantity, and adipocyte size returned to normal. In glucose tolerance tests, the glucose responses were comparable in the TEL- and CAND-treated SHR and obese controls, whereas the insulin response was almost halved by AT(1) blockade. Expression of PPARγ target genes aP2, FAT CD36, FASn, and PEPCK remained unaltered at the protein level in visceral fat after TEL and CAND compared with the CD-fed controls. Because the expression of examined PPARγ target genes was not affected, we concluded that improved insulin sensitivity after long-term treatment with AT(1) blockers was not related to a PPARγ-dependent mechanism.

Screening for adiponectin secretion regulators

Adiponectin is an adipokine secreted from adipocytes and plays important roles in the suppression of metabolic syndromes that can result in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and atherosclerosis. Adiponectin is a promising drug target because a number of studies have shown that upregulation of adiponectin has a number of therapeutic benefits. Extensive efforts have revealed various adiponectin regulators, such as cytokines, transcription factors, and drugs. Cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α, IL-6, and IL-18, downregulate adiponectin production. On the other hand, transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein α, and forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) upregulate adiponectin expression, although the activating transcription factor 3 and cAMP response element-binding protein downregulate it. Although a number of therapeutic drugs have been reported as adiponectin secretion regulators, most of them act through PPARγ-dependent mechanisms, leaving PPARγ-derived side effects as a concern. Using high-throughput screening, we have identified PPARγ-independent adiponectin secretion regulators as potential drug candidates with a novel mechanism of action.

Telmisartan ameliorates hyperglycemia and metabolic profile in nonobese Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats via peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma activation

The importance of hypertension treatment has expanded beyond blood pressure management to include additional risk factors, mainly diabetes. It was considered of interest to test the effect of telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor 1 antagonist and peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma partial agonist, on Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive nonobese (CRDH) rats, a unique model combining both pathologies. Its effect was examined on fat-derived and inflammatory agents in CRDH. To determine the extent of the drug's peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma modulating beneficial metabolic actions, results were compared with those obtained with valsartan and rosiglitazone in CRDH and Cohen diabetic rat (CDR). Telmisartan and valsartan were given in drinking water at 3 and 12 mg/kg/d, whereas rosiglitazone (3 mg/kg/d) was given as food admixture for a period of 5 months. Blood pressure, glucose, insulin, adiponectin, leptin, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were examined. Telmisartan and valsartan significantly (P < .01) reduced blood pressure, whereas telmisartan and rosiglitazone considerably reduced blood glucose levels to normoglycemic levels (P < .01) in these 2 strains. Insulin levels were not affected by telmisartan and valsartan but were slightly reduced by rosiglitazone in CDR. In contrast to valsartan, adiponectin was significantly (60%, P < .01) increased by telmisartan in both CDR and CRDH, whereas rosiglitazone induced a 60% and 180% increase in CRDH and CDR animals, respectively, on day 30 of treatment. Co-treatment with GW9662 averted telmisartan-induced rise of adiponectin. Tumor necrosis factor alpha declined in telmisartan-treated rats, less so with rosiglitazone, but not valsartan. Telmisartan also induced downsizing of epididymal adipocytes compared with valsartan. Leptin levels were significantly increased by valsartan (P < .05) but reduced by telmisartan and rosiglitazone. The telmisartan-induced increase in adiponectin was most probably associated with a decrease in glucose and tumor necrosis factor alpha levels. Therefore, in addition to its hypotensive effect, telmisartan demonstrated beneficial thiazolidinedione-like effects.

A small difference in the molecular structure of angiotensin II receptor blockers induces AT₁ receptor-dependent and -independent beneficial effects

Angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT₁) receptor blockers (ARBs) induce multiple pharmacological beneficial effects, but not all ARBs have the same effects and the molecular mechanisms underlying their actions are not certain. In this study, irbesartan and losartan were examined because of their different molecular structures (irbesartan has a cyclopentyl group whereas losartan has a chloride group). We analyzed the binding affinity and production of inositol phosphate (IP), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and adiponectin. Compared with losartan, irbesartan showed a significantly higher binding affinity and slower dissociation rate from the AT₁ receptor and a significantly higher degree of inverse agonism and insurmountability toward IP production. These effects of irbesartan were not seen with the AT₁-Y113A mutant receptor. On the basis of the molecular modeling of the ARBs-AT₁ receptor complex and a mutagenesis study, the phenyl group at Tyr(113) in the AT₁ receptor and the cyclopentyl group of irbesartan may form a hydrophobic interaction that is stronger than the losartan-AT₁ receptor interaction. Interestingly, irbesartan inhibited MCP-1 production more strongly than losartan. This effect was mediated by the inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B activation that was independent of the AT₁ receptor in the human coronary endothelial cells. In addition, irbesartan, but not losartan, induced significant adiponectin production that was mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and this effect was not mediated by the AT₁ receptor. In conclusion, irbesartan induced greater beneficial effects than losartan due to small differences between their molecular structures, and these differential effects were both dependent on and independent of the AT₁ receptor.

Review: angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers: class effects versus molecular effects

Highly selective angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs) are now available. The AT(1) receptor is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and block the diverse effects of Ang II. Several ARBs are available for clinical use. Most ARBs have common molecular structures (biphenyl-tetrazol and imidazole groups) and it is clear that ARBs have 'class effects'. On the other hand, recent clinical studies have demonstrated that not all ARBs have the same effects, and some benefits conferred by ARBs may not be class effects, and instead may be 'molecular effects'. In addition, each ARB has been clearly shown to have specific molecular effects in basic experimental studies, and these effects may be due to small differences in the molecular structure of each ARB. However, it is controversial whether ARBs have molecular effects in a clinical setting. Although the presence of molecular effects for each ARB based on experimental studies may not directly influence the clinical outcome, this possibility has not been adequately evaluated. This review focuses on the class effects versus molecular effects of ARBs from bench to bedside.

Mouse models of the metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by obesity concomitant with other metabolic abnormalities such as hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high-density lipoprotein levels, elevated blood pressure and raised fasting glucose levels. The precise definition of MetS, the relationships of its metabolic features, and what initiates it, are debated. However, obesity is on the rise worldwide, and its association with these metabolic symptoms increases the risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease (among many other diseases). Research needs to determine the mechanisms by which obesity and MetS increase the risk of disease. In light of this growing epidemic, it is imperative to develop animal models of MetS. These models will help determine the pathophysiological basis for MetS and how MetS increases the risk for other diseases. Among the various animal models available to study MetS, mice are the most commonly used for several reasons. First, there are several spontaneously occurring obese mouse strains that have been used for decades and that are very well characterized. Second, high-fat feeding studies require only months to induce MetS. Third, it is relatively easy to study the effects of single genes by developing transgenic or gene knockouts to determine the influence of a gene on MetS. For these reasons, this review will focus on the benefits and caveats of the most common mouse models of MetS. It is our hope that the reader will be able to use this review as a guide for the selection of mouse models for their own studies.

Telmisartan: a different angiotensin II receptor blocker protecting a different population?

The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET()) showed that the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan was as protective as the reference-standard ramipril in a broad cross-section of patients at increased cardiovascular risk, but was better tolerated. Telmisartan has a unique profile among ARBs, with a high affinity for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, a long duration of receptor binding, a high lipophilicity and a long plasma half life. This leads to sustained and powerful blood pressure lowering when compared with the first marketed ARBs, such as losartan and valsartan. Some pharmacological properties of telmisartan clearly distinguish it from other members of the ARB class and may contribute to the clinical effects seen with telmisartan. A class effect for ARBs cannot be assumed. To date, telmisartan is the only ARB that has been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk in at-risk cardiovascular patients.

Production and secretion of adiponectin from 3T3-L1 adipocytes: comparison of antihypertensive drugs

BACKGROUND

Adiponectin is an important vascular protective adipocytokine that possesses antidiabetic, antiatherogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various antihypertensive drugs on the production and secretion of adiponectin from adipocytes.

METHODS

3T3-L1 adipocytes were incubated for 6 h with increased doses of the following drugs: hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, losartan, telmisartan, captopril, and nifedipine. Adiponectin levels, as well as adiponectin-mRNA expression, were measured in the medium and cells.

RESULTS

Significant increases of adiponectin were induced by telmisartan: 56% with a dose of 0.1 micromol/l (P < 0.05), 131% with 10 micromol/l (P < 0.05), and 125% with 100 micromol/l (P < 0.01). Losartan (100 micromol/l) also increased adiponectin by 65% (P < 0.05). Conversely, hydrochlorothiazide, 0.1 micromol/l, reduced adiponectin by 37% (P < 0.01). Captopril, atenolol, and nifedipine had no effect on adiponectin. Gene expression of adiponectin correlated with these results: with telmisartan, it increased by 27%, and with hydrochlorothiazide it decreased by 38% (P < 0.05 for both compared to the control).

CONCLUSION

In this comparative model, telmisartan, and to a lesser extent, losartan, increased production and secretion of adiponectin from 3T3-L1 adipocytes compared to the other antihypertensive drugs.

Serum adiponectin concentrations correlate with severity of rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by extent of joint destruction

Adiponectin is a hormone released by adipose tissue with antidiabetic, antiatherogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties. The present observational study focused on the relation between serum adiponectin level and the disease severity of established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Ninety patients with more than 5-year diagnosis of RA and 42 age- and BMI-matched control were enrolled. The severity of RA was evaluated according to the number of destructed joints of overall 68 joints on plain radiographs (37 patients had mild RA and 53 had severe RA). Serum adiponectin level was significantly higher in the severe RA group (17.7+/-6.7 microg/ml) than in the control (9.1+/-3.8 microg/ml) and mild RA groups (13.9+/-6.5 microg/ml) (control vs. mild RA group, P<0.001; mild RA vs. severe RA group, P<0.01). These results suggest that increased number of joint destruction is associated with hyperadiponectinemia in established RA patients.

Angiotensin receptor blockers in the treatment of NASH/NAFLD: could they be a first-class option?

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a condition pathogenically linked to metabolic syndrome (MS) by insulin resistance (IR), and characterized by hepatic steatosis in the absence of significant alcohol use, hepatotoxicity, and/or other known liver diseases.The principles of NAFLD therapy target IR: the key point of MS. As the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a central role in IR, and subsequently in NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), an attempt to block the deleterious effects of RAS overexpression seems a logical target. While many potential therapies tested in NASH target only the consequences of this condition, or try to "get rid" of excessive fat, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) could act as an elegant tool for adequate correction of the various imbalances that act in harmony in NASH/NAFLD. Indeed, by inhibiting RAS we can improve the intracellular insulin signaling pathway, better control adipose tissue proliferation and adipokine production, and produce more balanced local and systemic levels of various cytokines. At the same time, by controlling the local RAS in the liver we might be able to prevent at least fibrosis and also slow down the vicious cycle that links steatosis to necroinflammation. By targeting the pancreatic effects of angiotensin we should be able to preserve an adequate insulin secretion and acquire a better metabolic balance.In our opinion there are two major advantages of ARBs that make them a possible therapeutic option for treating NASH and MS: their specific antihypertensive effect, and their impact on liver fibrosis. In light of this, and based on the current evidence (including existent human studies), we can speculate that some ARBs like telmisartan, candesartan, and losartan can be beneficial in treating NASH/NAFLD and its consequences, and further larger controlled clinical trials will bring consistent data into this field.