Standard of care plus telmisartan on respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (STAR-COVID trial)

BACKGROUND

The potential influence of renin-angiotensin inhibitors on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been considered in preclinical and observational studies with contradictory results. Therefore, we investigated the effect of telmisartan in reducing lung injury among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

The STAR-COVID trial was conducted as a prospective, parallel-group, randomized, open-label study involving hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 (NCT04510662). Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 33 were assigned to the telmisartan group and 33 to the control group. The mean age of participants was 48.8 years, with 62.5% being male. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either telmisartan (40 mg daily for 14 days or until discharge) plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary outcome assessed was the initiation of mechanical ventilation within 14 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, the need for vasopressors, hemodialysis requirements, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Comparison between the telmisartan group and the control group revealed no significant difference in the occurrence of mechanical ventilation at 14 days (25% with telmisartan vs. 18.7% with control, P=0.579). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed in terms of mortality (25% vs. 21.9%, P=0.768), the need for vasopressors (18.8% in both groups, P=1.000), hemodialysis requirements (6.3% vs. 3.1%, P=0.500), and length of hospital stay (median of 7 days in both groups, P=0.962).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the standard of care, telmisartan therapy demonstrated no significant impact on respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.

Intestinal Absorption of Nanoparticles to Reduce Oxidative Stress and Vasoconstriction for Treating Diabetic Nephropathy

The etiology of diabetic nephropathy (DN) is complex, and the incidence is increasing year by year. The patient's kidney showed oxidative stress damage, increasing active oxygen species (ROS) content, and vasoconstriction. Due to poor drug solubility and low renal accumulation, the current treatment regimens have not effectively alleviated glomerulopathy and other kidney damage caused by DN. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore new treatment strategies and drug delivery systems. Here, we constructed an oral nanodelivery system (Tel/CAN@CS-DA) that reduced oxidative stress and vasoconstriction. Deoxycholic acid (DA)-modified nanoparticles entered into intestinal epithelial cells (Caco2 cells) via the bile acid biomimetic pathway, then escaped from the lysosomes and eventually spat out the cells, increasing the oral absorption of nanoparticles. Chitosan (CS) nanoparticles could achieve renal targeting through specific binding with a renal giant protein receptor and deliver drugs to renal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2 cells). In vitro studies also proved that telmisartan (Tel) and canagliflozin (CAN) effectively removed cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduced HK-2 cell apoptosis caused by high glucose. In the in vivo model induced by streptozotocin (STZ), the results showed that the nanosystem not only elevated AMPK protein expression, inhibited angiotensin II (Ang II) protein expression to effectively reduce oxidative stress level, dilated renal blood vessels but also reduced the degree of inflammation and fibrosis. Overall, Tel/CAN@CS-DA multifunctional oral nanosystem can effectively treat DN with low toxicity, which provides a new idea for the treatment of DN.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe in patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III clinical trial

This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of the blood pressure (BP) control and cholesterol-lowering effects and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin and ezetimibe double therapy or telmisartan single therapy in dyslipidemia patients with hypertension. After a wash-out/therapeutic lifestyle change period of ≥4 weeks, a total of 100 eligible patients were randomized and received one of three treatments for 8 weeks: (1) telmisartan 80 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (TRE), (2) rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (RE), or (3) telmisartan 80 mg (T). The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluation of TRE by comparing changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and mean percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment. The least square (LS) mean (SE) changes in msSBP at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -23.02 (3.04) versus -7.18 (3.09) mmHg in the TRE and RE groups, respectively (p < .0001), and -25.80 (2.74) versus -14.92 (2.65) mmHg in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p = .0005). The percentage changes in the mean (SD) LDL-C at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -54.97% (3.49%) versus -0.17% (3.23%) in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p < .0001). No serious adverse events occurred, and no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overall AEs and adverse drug reactions occurred among the three groups. TRE therapy significantly decreased msSBP and LDL-C compared to RE or T therapy with comparable safety and tolerability profiles.

Nanofabrications of Erythrocyte Membrane-Coated Telmisartan Delivery System Effective for Radiosensitivity of Tumor Cells in Mice Model

Background

Radiation stimulates the secretion of tumor stroma and induces resistance, recurrence, and metastasis of stromal-vascular tumors during radiotherapy. The proliferation and activation of tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs) are important reasons for the production of tumor stroma. Telmisartan (Tel) can inhibit the proliferation and activation of TAFs (resting TAFs), which may promote radiosensitization. However, Tel has a poor water solubility.

Methods

In this study, self-assembled telmisartan nanoparticles (Tel NPs) were prepared by aqueous solvent diffusion method to solve the insoluble problem of Tel and achieve high drug loading of Tel. Then, erythrocyte membrane (ECM) obtained by hypotonic lysis was coated on the surface of Tel NPs (ECM/Tel) for the achievement of in vivo long circulation and tumor targeting. Immunofluorescence staining, western blot and other biological techniques were used to investigate the effect of ECM/Tel on TAFs activation inhibition (resting effect) and mechanisms involved. The multicellular spheroids (MCSs) model and mouse breast cancer cells (4T1) were constructed to investigate the effect of ECM/Tel on reducing stroma secretion, alleviating hypoxia, and the corresponding promoting radiosensitization effect in vitro. A mouse orthotopic 4T1 breast cancer model was constructed to investigate the radiosensitizing effect of ECM/Tel on inhibiting breast cancer growth and lung metastasis of breast cancer.

Results

ECM/Tel showed good physiological stability and tumor-targeting ability. ECM/Tel could rest TAFs and reduce stroma secretion, alleviate hypoxia, and enhance penetration in tumor microenvironment. In addition, ECM/Tel arrested the cell cycle of 4T1 cells to the radiosensitive G2/M phase. In mouse orthotopic 4T1 breast cancer model, ECM/Tel played a superior role in radiosensitization and significantly inhibited lung metastasis of breast cancer.

Conclusion

ECM/Tel showed synergistical radiosensitization effect on both the tumor microenvironment and tumor cells, which is a promising radiosensitizer in the radiotherapy of stroma-vascular tumors.

A Novel Hybrid of Telmisartan and Borneol Ameliorates Neuroinflammation and White Matter Injury in Ischemic Stroke Through ATF3/CH25H Axis

Cerebral ischemic stroke causes substantial white matter injury, which is further aggravated by neuroinflammation mediated by microglia/astrocytes. Given the anti-neuroinflammatory action of telmisartan and the enhancing blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability potential of resuscitation-inducing aromatic herbs, 13 hybrids (3a-m) of telmisartan (or its simplified analogues) with resuscitation-inducing aromatic agents were designed, synthesized, and biologically evaluated. Among them, the optimal compound 3a (the ester hybrid of telmisartan and (+)-borneol) potently inhibited neuroinflammation mediated by microglia/astrocytes and ameliorated ischemic stroke. Particularly, 3a significantly conferred protection for white matter integrity after cerebral ischemic stroke via decreasing abnormally dephosphorylated neurofilament protein, upregulating myelin basic protein, and attenuating oligodendrocyte damage. Further RNA-sequencing data revealed that 3a upregulated expression of transcriptional regulator ATF3 to reduce the expression of CH25H, prevented proinflammatory state of lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia/astrocytes to limit excessive inflammation, and eventually protected neighboring oligodendrocytes to prevent white matter injury. Taken with the desirable pharmacokinetics behavior and improved brain distribution, 3a may be a feasible therapeutic agent for ischemic stroke and other neurological disorders with white matter injury.

Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients

There is a lack of studies comparing the risk of cardio-cerebrovascular disease between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) of different half-lives. We aimed to compare the risks of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan with different half-lives in a national claim-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥ 40 years with hypertension. To establish a cohort exposed to valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, or telmisartan, we performed propensity score (PS) matching and used an as-treated approach to evaluate exposure. The Cox regression model was employed to calculate hazard ratios, which were based on the incidence rate for each newly occurring event of MI, heart failure, or cerebrovascular disease. These hazard ratios were calculated to compare the risk of MI, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease associated with valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan in comparison to telmisartan. A PS-matched cohort of 148,229 patients was established for each of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, or telmisartan. The matched cohort analysis showed that the adjusted hazard ratio (aHRs, 95% confidence interval) for MI was higher for valsartan use (1.39, 1.33-1.45) and losartan use (1.10, 1.05-1.15) but lower for irbesartan use (0.90, 0.86-0.94) compared with the reference (telmisartan). The aHRs for HF were not different among these ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers). The aHR for cerebrovascular disease was lower for valsartan use (0.85, 0.83-0.87) and losartan use (0.80, 0.78-0.82) but higher for irbesartan use (1.11, 1.09-1.13) compared with the reference. We found differences in the risk of MI and cerebrovascular disease with the use of different ARBs compared to telmisartan use. Valsartan, and losartan with a short half-life, which showed a higher risk of MI, had a lower risk of cerebrovascular disease. Conversely, irbesartan with a long half-life, which showed a lower risk of MI, had a higher risk of cerebrovascular disease.

[Sartans in the treatment of arterial hypertension: focus on telmisartan and azilsartan. A review]

The activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is one of the main pathogenetic mechanisms underlying cardiovascular diseases at all stages of the cardiovascular continuum. This article discusses the role of telmisartan and azilsartan as the most powerful sartans in modern cardiology. Azilsartan and especially telmisartan have a significant organoprotection and are superior to other antihypertensive drugs in terms of lowering blood pressure. However, the effect of azilsartan on hard endpoints has not been studied while the efficacy of telmisartan on hard endpoints has been evaluated in plenty clinical trials including 3 large randomized clinical trials with several thousand patients. The article also presents calculations showing the better cost-effectiveness of telmisartan compared to azilsartan.

A BRASH Diagnosis With a Timely Intervention

The BRASH (bradycardia, renal failure, atrioventricular block, shock, and hyperkalaemia) syndrome is a recently recognized condition which may lead to life-threatening complications if not correctly identified and treated early. We report here the case of a 74-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and atrial flutter who presented to the emergency department with 2-day history of dizziness, presyncope, and bradycardia, and a junctional rhythm at 61 beat per minute on initial ECG. She was on apixaban, digoxin, prazosin, and telmisartan. Serum biochemistry revealed severe hyperkalaemia with a potassium 8.4 mmol/L, creatinine 161 mmol/L, glucose 15.3 mmol/L and an upper normal digoxin level of 1.2 mmol/L (ref. 0.6-1.2). Arterial blood pH was 7.2. Given the constellation of biochemical and clinical findings a diagnosis of BRASH syndrome was made, though her blood pressure values at presentation were rather high (180/65-179/59 mmHg). The patient was rapidly stabilised with the administration of intravenous insulin and dextrose, fluid resuscitation, and zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), followed by haemodialysis. Following the correction of the serum potassium to 4.7 mmol/L, a further ECG performed 6 hours later, showed a restoration of sinus rhythm with a rate of 65 bpm, normalization of the QRS duration. The digoxin and telmisartan were discontinued, and the patient was commenced on a calcium channel antagonist for hypertension. Clinicians should be alerted to patients who present with either a BRASH (shock) or BRAHH (hypertensive manifestation) where timely intervention is essential to avoid life-threatening brady-and tachyarrhythmias in these patients.

Chronic Lithium Toxicity in Old Age Patients Taking Angiotensin Receptor Blocker: A Case Report

Chronic lithium toxicity is a potentially serious side effect on patients taking lithium for a prolonged period with the diagnosis of mood disorders. The toxicity is even higher in patients taking drugs that interfere with the metabolism of lithium like angiotensin receptor blockers and in older patients with reduced kidney function. In this report, we present the case of a 62-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with symptoms including loose stools, generalised body weakness, slurred speech, coarse hand tremors, and dystonia persisting for fifteen days. She had been under lithium therapy for bipolar type 1 disorder for 15 years before experiencing these symptoms, which emerged shortly after the addition of telmisartan (angiotensinogen receptor blocker) for hypertension.

Keywords

angiotensin receptor blocker; bipolar disorder; case reports; lithium; telmisartan.

Overall and inter-individual effect of four different drug classes on soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in type 1 and type 2 diabetes

AIM

To evaluate the effect of four different drug classes on soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a biomarker active in multiple inflammatory processes and a risk factor for complications, in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted post hoc analyses of a randomized, open-label, crossover trial including 26 adults with type 1 and 40 with type 2 diabetes with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio ≥30 and ≤500 mg/g assigned to 4-week treatments with telmisartan 80 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, linagliptin 5 mg and baricitinib 2 mg, separated by 4-week washouts. Plasma suPAR was measured before and after each treatment. SuPAR change after each treatment was calculated and, for each individual, the best suPAR-reducing drug was identified. Subsequently, the effect of the best individual drug was compared against the mean of the other three drugs. Repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models were employed.

RESULTS

The baseline median (interquartile range) plasma suPAR was 3.5 (2.9, 4.3) ng/mL. No overall effect on suPAR levels was observed for any one drug. The individual best-performing drug varied, with baricitinib being selected for 20 participants (30%), followed by empagliflozin for 19 (29%), linagliptin for 16 (24%) and telmisartan for 11 (17%). The individual best-performing drug reduced suPAR by 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7, 22.8; P = 0.007). The difference in suPAR response between the individual best-performing drug and the other three was -19.7% (95% CI -23.1, -16.3; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated no overall effect of 4-week treatment with telmisartan, empagliflozin, linagliptin or baricitinib on suPAR. However, individualization of treatment might significantly reduce suPAR levels.

Therapeutic effects of candesartan in inflammatory skin disorders by suppressing Th17 differentiation

As angiotensin II is associated with inflammation, type I angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) exibit anti-inflammatory effects in patients with hypertension as well as inflammatory disease animal models including arthritis models. The present study aimed to investigate whether ARBs exert anti-inflammatory effects in vivo in skin disorders. We tested effects of ARBs on 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene(CDNB)-induced atopic dermatitis-like and imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin models. CDNB-induced atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions were suppressed by administration of candesartan or telmisartan. The suppressive effect of telmisartan was blocked by the presence of GW9662, a selective PPARγ inhibitor, but not that of candesartan. Both ARBs suppressed increases in pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-4, IL-13, IFN-γ, and IL-17A) levels, and GW9662 inhibited telmisartan-induced suppression but not candesartan. Candesartan significantly inhibited in vitro differentiation of naïve T cells into Th17 cells to a greater extent than telmisartan. In the imiquimod-induced psoriasis model, whose primary etiology is activation of IL-23/IL-17 axis, candesartan significantly suppressed psoriasis-like skin lesions and Th17 cell populations in both lymph nodes and spleens to a greater extent than telmisartan. Overall, certain ARBs may have anti-inflammatory effects in skin diseases. Candesartan may have therapeutic implications in inflammatory skin disorders by suppressing Th17 differentiation, while telmisartan might have therapeutic potential by activating PPARγ.

Exploring the repurposing potential of telmisartan drug in breast cancer: an in-silico and in-vitro approach

Anticancer drug resistance is one of the biggest hurdles in the treatment of breast cancer. Drug repurposing is a viable option fordeveloping novel medical treatment strategies since this method is more cost-efficient and rapid. Antihypertensive medicines have recently been found to have pharmacological features that could be used to treat cancer, making them effective candidates for therapeutic repurposing. The goal of our research is to find a potent antihypertensive drug that can be repurposed as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. In this study, virtual screening was performed using a set of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antihypertensive drugs as ligands with selected receptor proteins (EGFR, KRAS, P53, AGTR1, AGTR2, and ACE) assuming these proteins are regarded to have a significant role in hypertension as well as breast cancer. Further, our in-silico results were further confirmed by an in-vitro experiment (cytotoxicity assay). All the compounds (enalapril, atenolol, acebutolol, propranolol, amlodipine, verapamil, doxazosin, prazosin, hydralazine, irbesartan, telmisartan, candesartan, and aliskiren) showed remarkable affinity towards the target receptor proteins. However, maximum affinity was displayed by telmisartan. Cell-based cytotoxicity study of telmisartan in MCF7 (breast cancer cell line) confirmed the anticancer effect of telmisartan. IC50 of the drug was calculated to be 7.75 µM and at this concentration, remarkable morphological alterations were observed in the MCF7 cells confirming its cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells. Based on both in-silico and in-vitro studies, we can conclude that telmisartan appears to be a promising drug repurposing candidate for the therapeutic treatment of breast cancer.

Lactosylated Chitosan Nanoparticles Potentiate the Anticancer Effects of Telmisartan In Vitro and in a N-Nitrosodiethylamine-Induced Mice Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Telmisartan (TLM), a BSC class II drug, has been reported to have antiproliferative activity in HCC. However, its therapeutic activity is limited by poor bioavailability and unpredictable distribution. This work aimed to enhance TLM's liver uptake for HCC management through passive and active targeting pathways utilizing chitosan nanoparticles decorated with lactose (LCH NPs) as a delivery system. In vitro cell cytotoxicity and cellular uptake studies indicated that TLM-LCH NPs significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced the antiproliferative activity and cellular uptake percentage of TLM. In vivo bioavailability and liver biodistribution studies indicated that TLM-LCH NPs significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced TLM concentrations in plasma and the liver. The relative liver uptake of TLM from TLM-LCH NPs was 2-fold higher than that of unmodified NPs and 5-fold higher than that of plain TLM suspension. In vivo studies of a N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced HCC model revealed that administration of TLM through LCH NPs improved liver histology and resulted in lower serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels, and liver weight index compared to plain TLM and TLM-loaded unmodified NPs. These results reflected the high potentiality of LCH NPs as a liver-targeted delivery system for TLM in the treatment of HCC.

Financial implications of protocol-based hypertension treatment: an insight into medication costs in public and private health sectors in India

Hypertension is a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and calls for large-scale effective hypertension control programs. Adoption of drug and dose-specific treatment protocols recommended by the World Health Organization-HEARTS Initiative is key for hypertension control programs in LMICs. We estimated the annual medication cost per patient using three such protocols (protocol-1 and protocol-2 with Amlodipine, Telmisartan, using add-on doses and different drug orders, adding Chlorthalidone; protocol-3 with a single-pill combination (SPC) of Amlodipine/Telmisartan with dose up-titration, and addition of Chlorthalidone, if required) in India. The medication cost was simulated with different hypertension control assumptions for each protocol and calculated based on prices in the public and private sectors in India. The estimated annual medication cost per patient for protocol-1 and protocol-2 was $33.88-58.44 and $51.57-68.83 for protocol-3 in the private sector. The medication cost was lower in the generic stores ($5.78-9.57 for protocol-1 and protocol-2, and $7.35-9.89 for protocol-3). The medication cost for patients was the lowest ($2.05-3.89 for protocol-1 and protocol-2, and $2.94-3.98 for protocol-3) in the public sector. At less than $4 per patient per annum, scaling up a hypertension control program with specific treatment protocols is a potentially cost-effective public health intervention. Expanding low-cost generic retail networks would extend affordability in the private sector. The cost of treatment with SPC is comparable with non-SPC protocols and can be adopted in a public health program considering the advantage of simplified logistics, reduced pill burden, improved treatment adherence, and blood pressure control.

Efficacy of single-pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that a total of 11 single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.

Population-based discovery and Mendelian randomization analysis identify telmisartan as a candidate medicine for Alzheimer's disease in African Americans

INTRODUCTION

African Americans (AAs) and European Americans (EAs) differ in Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevalence, risk factors, and symptomatic presentation and AAs are less likely to enroll in AD clinical trials.

METHODS

We conducted race-conscious pharmacoepidemiologic studies of 5.62 million older individuals (age ≥60) to investigate the association of telmisartan exposure and AD outcome using Cox analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test. We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of large ethnically diverse genetic data to test likely causal relationships between telmisartan's target and AD.

RESULTS

We identified that moderate/high telmisartan exposure was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of AD in the AAs compared to low/no telmisartan exposure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.91, p-value = 0.0022), but not in the non-Hispanic EAs (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89-1.05, p-value = 0.4110). Sensitivity and sex-/age-stratified patient subgroup analyses identified that telmisartan's medication possession ratio (MPR) and average hypertension daily dosage were significantly associated with a stronger reduction in the incidence of both AD and dementia in AAs. Using MR analysis from large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (over 2 million individuals) across AD, hypertension, and diabetes, we further identified AA-specific beneficial effects of telmisartan for AD.

DISCUSSION

Randomized controlled trials with ethnically diverse patient cohorts are warranted to establish causality and therapeutic outcomes of telmisartan and AD.

HIGHLIGHTS

Telmisartan is associated with lower risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in African Americans (AAs). Telmisartan is the only angiotensin II receptor blockers having PPAR-γ agonistic properties with beneficial anti-diabetic and renal function effects, which mitigate AD risk in AAs. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis demonstrates the specificity of telmisartan's protective mechanism to AAs.

Telmisartan Is a Promising Agent for Managing Neuropathic Pain and Delaying Opioid Analgesic Tolerance in Rats

Despite the large arsenal of analgesic medications, neuropathic pain (NP) management is not solved yet. Angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1) has been identified as a potential target in NP therapy. Here, we investigate the antiallodynic effect of AT1 blockers telmisartan and losartan, and particularly their combination with morphine on rat mononeuropathic pain following acute or chronic oral administration. The impact of telmisartan on morphine analgesic tolerance was also assessed using the rat tail-flick assay. Morphine potency and efficacy in spinal cord samples of treated neuropathic animals were assessed by [35S]GTPγS-binding assay. Finally, the glutamate content of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was measured by capillary electrophoresis. Oral telmisartan or losartan in higher doses showed an acute antiallodynic effect. In the chronic treatment study, the combination of subanalgesic doses of telmisartan and morphine ameliorated allodynia and resulted in a leftward shift in the dose-response curve of morphine in the [35S]GTPγS binding assay and increased CSF glutamate content. Telmisartan delayed morphine analgesic-tolerance development. Our study has identified a promising combination therapy composed of telmisartan and morphine for NP and opioid tolerance. Since telmisartan is an inhibitor of AT1 and activator of PPAR-γ, future studies are needed to analyze the effect of each component.

Optimization of Albuminuria-Lowering Treatment in Diabetes by Crossover Rotation to Four Different Drug Classes: A Randomized Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVE

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors decrease the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) but are ineffective in up to 40% of patients. We hypothesized that rotation through different drug classes overcomes RAS inhibitor resistance and tested this in a randomized crossover trial.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We assigned 26 adults with type 1 diabetes and 37 with type 2 diabetes and UACR between 30 and 500 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 4-week treatment periods with telmisartan 80 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, linagliptin 5 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg in random order, separated by 4-week washout periods. Each participant was then re-exposed for 4 weeks to the drug that induced that individual's largest UACR reduction. Primary outcome was the difference in UACR response to the best-performing drug during the confirmation period versus UACR response to the other three drugs.

RESULTS

There was substantial variation in the best-performing drug. Telmisartan was best performing for 33 participants (52%), empagliflozin and linagliptin in 11 (17%), and baricitinib in 8 participants (13%). The individuals' best-performing drug changed UACR from baseline during the first and confirmatory exposures by a mean of -39.6% (95% CI -44.8, -33.8; P < 0.001) and -22.4% (95% CI -29.7, -12.5; P < 0.001), respectively. The Pearson correlation for first versus confirmatory exposure was 0.39 (P = 0.017). The mean change in UACR with the other three drugs was +1.6% (95% CI -4.3%, 8.0%; P = 0.593 versus baseline; difference versus individuals' best-performing drug at confirmation, 30.9% [95% CI 18.0, 45.3]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a large and reproducible variation in participants' responses to different UACR-lowering drug classes. These data support systematic rotation through different drug classes to overcome therapy resistance to RAS inhibition.

Antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE

We performed this meta-analysis determining the antihypertensive effect of telmisartan versus perindopril in patients with essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND

The comparison of antihypertensive effects between telmisartan and perindopril were controversial.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched for all published studies.

RESULTS

The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 753 patients included in 7 trials with a mean follow-up of 20 ± 16 weeks. There was no significant difference between telmisartan and perindopril in reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP, weighted mean differences (WMD) 0.02 (95% confidence interval (CI), ‒2.78, 2.81) mm Hg, p > 0.05). The reduction of diastolic BP (DBP) treated with telmisartan was greater than perindopril in these patients (WMD ‒2.05 (95% CI, ‒2.60, ‒1.49) mm Hg, p < 0.001). Considering the effects of different doses on BP reduction, a sub-analysis was performed. The reduction of DBP treated with 40 mg/day telmisartan was greater than 4‒5 mg/day perindopril (WMD ‒2.18 (95% CI, ‒2.83, ‒1.53) mm Hg, p 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The reduction of DBP is greater treated with telmisartan than perindopril in patients with essential hypertension (Tab. 2, Fig. 4, Ref. 34). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: essential hypertension, blood pressure, telmisartan, perindopril, meta-analysis.

Angiotensin receptor blockers for the treatment of covid-19: pragmatic, adaptive, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether disrupting the renin angiotensin system with angiotensin receptor blockers will improve clinical outcomes in people with covid-19.

DESIGN

CLARITY was a pragmatic, adaptive, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

17 hospital sites in India and Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were at least 18 years old, previously untreated with angiotensin receptor blockers, with a laboratory confirmed diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection who had been admitted to hospital for management of covid-19.

INTERVENTION

Oral angiotensin receptor blockers (telmisartan in India) or placebo (1:1) for 28 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was covid-19 disease severity using a modified World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO scale) at day 14. Secondary outcomes were WHO scale scores at day 28, mortality, intensive care unit admission, and respiratory failure. Analyses were evaluated on an ordinal scale in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Between 3 May 2020 and 13 November 2021, 2930 people were screened for eligibility, with 393 randomly assigned to angiotensin receptor blockers (of which 388 (98.7%) to telmisartan 40 mg/day) and 394 to the control group. 787 participants were randomised: 778 (98.9%) from India and nine (1.1%) from Australia. The median WHO scale score at day 14 was 1 (interquartile range 1-1) in 384 participants assigned angiotensin receptor blockers and 1 (1-1) in 382 participants assigned placebo (adjusted odds ratio 1.51 (95% credible interval 1.02 to 2.23), probability of an odds ratio of >1 (Pr(OR>1)=0.98). WHO scale scores at day 28 showed little evidence of difference between groups (1.02 (0.55 to 1.87), Pr(OR>1)=0.53). The trial was stopped when a prespecified futility rule was met.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients admitted to hospital for covid-19, mostly with mild disease, not requiring oxygen, no evidence of benefit, based on disease severity score, was found for treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers, using predominantly 40 mg/day of telmisartan.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04394117.

Effect of Telmisartan on Walking Performance in Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: The TELEX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) have reduced lower extremity perfusion, impaired lower extremity skeletal muscle function, and poor walking performance. Telmisartan (an angiotensin receptor blocker) has properties that reverse these abnormalities.

Objective

To determine whether telmisartan improves 6-minute walk distance, compared with placebo, in patients with lower extremity PAD at 6-month follow-up.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 US sites and involving 114 participants. Enrollment occurred between December 28, 2015, and November 9, 2021. Final follow-up occurred on May 6, 2022.

Interventions

The trial randomized patients using a 2 × 2 factorial design to compare the effects of telmisartan plus supervised exercise vs telmisartan alone and supervised exercise alone and to compare telmisartan alone vs placebo. Participants with PAD were randomized to 1 of 4 groups: telmisartan plus exercise (n = 30), telmisartan plus attention control (n = 29), placebo plus exercise (n = 28), or placebo plus attention control (n = 27) for 6 months. The originally planned sample size was 240 participants. Due to slower than anticipated enrollment, the primary comparison was changed to the 2 combined telmisartan groups vs the 2 combined placebo groups and the target sample size was changed to 112 participants.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the 6-month change in 6-minute walk distance (minimum clinically important difference, 8-20 m). The secondary outcomes were maximal treadmill walking distance; Walking Impairment Questionnaire scores for distance, speed, and stair climbing; and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical functioning score. The results were adjusted for study site, baseline 6-minute walk distance, randomization to exercise vs attention control, sex, and history of heart failure at baseline.

Results

Of the 114 randomized patients (mean age, 67.3 [SD, 9.9] years; 46 were women [40.4%]; and 81 were Black individuals [71.1%]), 105 (92%) completed 6-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, telmisartan did not significantly improve 6-minute walk distance (from a mean of 341.6 m to 343.0 m; within-group change: 1.32 m) compared with placebo (from a mean of 352.3 m to 364.8 m; within-group change: 12.5 m) and the adjusted between-group difference was -16.8 m (95% CI, -35.9 m to 2.2 m; P = .08). Compared with placebo, telmisartan did not significantly improve any of the 5 secondary outcomes. The most common serious adverse event was hospitalization for PAD (ie, lower extremity revascularization, amputation, or gangrene). Three participants (5.1%) in the telmisartan group and 2 participants (3.6%) in the placebo group were hospitalized for PAD.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with PAD, telmisartan did not improve 6-minute walk distance at 6-month follow-up compared with placebo. These results do not support telmisartan for improving walking performance in patients with PAD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02593110.

Effects of high-intensity statin combined with telmisartan versus amlodipine on glucose metabolism in hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease patients with impaired fasting glucose: A randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

There is lacking evidence that telmisartan can improve insulin resistance in patients on high-intensity statins. This study compared the effects of telmisartan and amlodipine on glucose metabolism in hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) requiring high-intensity rosuvastatin therapy.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups [telmisartan-statin group (n=48) and amlodipine-statin group (n=51)] as add-on therapy to high-intensity rosuvastatin therapy (20 mg). The primary endpoint was to assess insulin resistance using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) value at week 24. The secondary endpoint was the change in glucose metabolism indices from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

The HOMA-IR at week 24 (2.4 [interquartile range, 1.8-3.8] versus 2.7 [1.7-3.7]; P = .809) and changes in the HOMA-IR from baseline to week 24 (-7.0 [-29.0 to 21.0] versus -5.5 [-53.3 to 27.3]; P = .539) were not significantly different between 2 groups. However, the fasting glucose level at week 24 was significantly lower in the telmisartan-statin group than in the amlodipine-statin group (107.7 ± 13.4 mg/dL versus 113.3 ± 12.4 mg/dL; P = .039) and significantly decreased in the telmisartan-statin group (-3.2 ± 8.6% versus 3.8 ± 13.2%; P = .003). The proportion of patients with fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dL (71.1% versus 89.6%; P = .047) or new-onset diabetes mellitus (12.5% versus 31.4%, P = .044) at week 24 was also significantly lower in the telmisartan-statin group than in the amlodipine-statin group.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to amlodipine, telmisartan did not decrease the HOMA-IR. However, telmisartan preserved insulin secretion, led to a regression from IFG to euglycemia and prevented new-onset diabetes mellitus in ASCVD patients with IFG requiring high-intensity statins.

Effects of Orlistat or Telmisartan on the Serum Free Fatty Acids in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients: An Open-Labeled Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

One of the important inducers of inflammatory responses and accumulation of fat in hepatocytes is free fatty acids which ultimately lead to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have high levels of plasma free fatty acids which are usually associated with type 2 diabetes and components of metabolic syndrome including dyslipidemia. Objective of this research is to investigate the effects of orlistat (a lipase enzyme inhibitor) or telmisartan (an angiotensin receptor blocker) on the serum free fatty acids in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients taking into consideration the baseline lipid profile.

METHODS

This open-label clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine at the University of Sulaimani in cooperation with Shar Teaching Hospital in Sulaimani city-Kurdistan Region of Iraq. A total number of 74 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients were recruited and grouped randomly into group I (n = 25) treated with orlistat (120 mg/day orally) for 12 weeks, group II (n = 24) treated with telmisartan (20 mg/day orally) for 8 weeks, and group III (n = 25) treated with placebo (carboxy- methyl cellulose) once daily. Fasting serum level of free fatty acid and lipid profile including total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoproteins were determined.

RESULTS

Orlistat and telmisartan significantly reduced the triglyceride-glucose index and free fatty acid levels (P < .001) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases.

CONCLUSION

Short-term treatment with orlistat or telmisartan produce effective and significant reductions in FFAs in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease compared to placebo. Orlistat effectively reduces the free fatty acid irrespective of the baseline lipid profile.

An insight into the role of telmisartan as PPAR-γ/α dual activator in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common hepatic disease. It is rapidly emerging as the frequent cause for liver transplantation with the risk of disease recurrence, even after transplantation. Clinical evidence showed an abnormally altered expression of different peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) isotypes (PPAR-α/γ/δ) in NAFLD with an involvement in the induction of insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, and hepatic inflammation. Recently, several dual PPAR-γ/α agonists were developed to simultaneously achieve the insulin-sensitizing effect of PPAR-γ as well as lipid catabolizing effect of PPAR-α. PPAR-α activation could counterbalance the steatogenic and adipogenic effects of PPAR-γ. But most of the drugs were ended in the initial level itself due to harmful adverse effects. In the present review, we discuss the possible mechanism of telmisartan, a typical angiotensin receptor blocker with excellent safety and pharmacokinetic profile, as a PPAR-γ/α dual agonist in the treatment of NAFLD.

Effects of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: protocol for a UK cohort study using routinely collected electronic health records with validation against the ONTARGET trial

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death globally, responsible for nearly 18 million deaths worldwide in 2017. Medications to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events are prescribed based on evidence from clinical trials which explore treatment effects in an indicated sample of the general population. However, these results may not be fully generalisable because of trial eligibility criteria that generally restrict to younger patients with fewer comorbidities. Therefore, evidence of effectiveness of medications for groups underrepresented in clinical trials such as those aged ≥75 years, from ethnic minority backgrounds or with low kidney function may be limited.Using individual anonymised data from the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and the Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) trial, in collaboration with the original trial investigators, we aim to investigate clinical trial replicability within a real-world setting in the area of cardiovascular disease. If the original trial results are replicable, we will estimate treatment effects and risk in groups underrepresented and excluded from the original clinical trial.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will develop a cohort analogous to the ONTARGET trial within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1 January 2001 and 31 July 2019 using the trial eligibility criteria and propensity score matching. The primary outcome is a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalisation for congestive heart failure. If results from the cohort study fall within pre-specified limits, we will expand the cohort to include under represented and excluded groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (Ref: 22658). The study has been approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee of the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (protocol no. 20_012). Access to the individual patient data from the ONTARGET trial was obtained by the trial investigators. Findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

Telmisartan Mitigates High-Glucose-Induced Injury in Renal Glomerular Endothelial Cells (rGECs) and Albuminuria in Diabetes Mice

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a common and severe complication of diabetes, impacting millions of people worldwide. High concentrations of serum glucose-associated injury of renal glomerular endothelial cells (rGECs) are involved in the DN pathogenesis. We found that exposure to high glucose increased the expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) in human rGECs (hrGECs). To block the increased AT1R level, we used the newly developed antagonist Telmisartan. This study investigated whether Telmisartan possessed a beneficial effect against high-glucose-induced insults in hrGECs and explored the underlying mechanism. Our findings indicate that Telmisartan ameliorated high-glucose-induced mitochondrial dysfunction by increasing mitochondrial membrane potential. Also, Telmisartan attenuated oxidative stress by reducing the levels of two oxidative stress biomarkers 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine (8-OHDG) and malondialdehyde (MDA). Further, we found that Telmisartan prevented high-glucose-induced expression of NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX-2). Interestingly, exposure to high glucose resulted in the increased endothelial permeability of renal glomerular endothelial cells, which was mitigated by treatment with Telmisartan. Mechanistically, these effects are mediated by the MLCK/MLC-2/occludin signaling pathway. In the leptin-deficient db/db diabetic mouse model, we proved that Telmisartan treatment ameliorated the reduction of occludin and albuminuria. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that Telmisartan possesses protective effects on high-glucose-induced injury to renal glomerular endothelial cells; its antagonizing of AT1R could be a potential therapeutic target in diabetic nephropathy.

Telmisartan use and risk of dementia in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may have protective effects against dementia occurrence in patients with hypertension (HTN). However, whether telmisartan, an ARB with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ)-modulating effects, has additional benefits compared to other ARBs remains unclear.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Between 1997 and 2013, 2,166,944 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Patients with HTN using ARBs were included in the study. Patients with a history of stroke, traumatic brain injury, or dementia were excluded. Finally, 65,511 eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: the telmisartan group and the non-telmisartan ARB group. Propensity score matching (1:4) was used to balance the distribution of baseline characteristics and medications. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of dementia. The secondary outcomes included the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and occurrence of symptomatic ischemic stroke (IS), any IS, and all-cause mortality. The risks between groups were compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. There were 2,280 and 9,120 patients in the telmisartan and non-telmisartan ARB groups, respectively. Patients in the telmisartan group had a lower risk of dementia diagnosis (telmisartan versus non-telmisartan ARBs: 2.19% versus 3.20%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97; p = 0.030). They also had lower risk of dementia diagnosis with IS as a competing risk (subdistribution HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95; p = 0.022) and with all-cause mortality as a competing risk (subdistribution HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97; p = 0.029). In addition, the telmisartan users had a lower risk of any IS (6.84% versus 8.57%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94; p = 0.008) during long-term follow-up. Study limitations included potential residual confounding by indication, interpretation of causal effects in an observational study, and bias caused by using diagnostic and medication codes to represent real clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that telmisartan use in hypertensive T2DM patients may be associated with a lower risk of dementia and any IS events in an East-Asian population.

Efficacy of telmisartan for the treatment of persistent renal proteinuria in dogs: A double-masked, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Information regarding efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, telmisartan, for treatment of proteinuria in dogs is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the antiproteinuric efficacy of telmisartan, as compared to enalapril, in dogs with chronic kidney disease and persistent, renal proteinuria.

ANIMALS

Thirty-nine client-owned dogs with chronic kidney disease and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) > 0.5 (if azotemic) or ≥ 1.0 (if nonazotemic).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial, dogs were block randomized, according to presence or absence of azotemia and systemic arterial hypertension, to receive telmisartan (1.0 mg/kg PO q24h), or enalapril (0.5 mg/kg PO q12h), and followed for 120 days. Up-titration of study drug dosage on days 30 and 60, and addition of the other study drug at day 90, were performed if UPC > 0.5 was noted at these visits. Percentage change in UPC relative to baseline was calculated for all time points. Data are presented as median (range).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (20 telmisartan-treated, 19 enalapril-treated) dogs were included. At day 30, percentage change in UPC was greater for telmisartan-treated (-65% [-95% to 104%]) vs enalapril-treated (-35% [-74% to 87%]) dogs (P = .002). Among dogs persistently proteinuric at earlier visits, telmisartan remained superior to enalapril at days 60 (P = .02) and 90 (P = .02). No difference in percentage change in UPC between study groups was observed at day 120, when combination therapy was allowed. Combination therapy resulted in relevant azotemia in 4/13 (31%) dogs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Telmisartan might be a suitable first-line therapy for dogs with renal proteinuria.

Mechanisms Involved in Superiority of Angiotensin Receptor Blockade over ACE Inhibition in Attenuating Neuropathic Pain Induced in Rats

Although previous reports described the beneficial role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) in attenuating neuropathic pain (NP), no study has yet explored the exact underlying mechanisms, as well as the superiority of using centrally versus peripherally acting renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) drugs in NP. We investigated the effects of 14 days of treatment with centrally (telmisartan and ramipril) or peripherally (losartan and enalapril) acting ARBs and ACE-Is, respectively, in attenuating peripheral NP induced by sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI) in rats. We also compared these with the effects of pregabalin, the standard treatment for NP. Behavioral changes, inflammatory markers (NFкB, TNF-α, COX-2, PGE2, and bradykinin), oxidative stress markers (NADPH oxidase and catalase), STAT3 activation, levels of phosphorylated P38-MAPK, ACE, AT1 receptor (AT1R), and AT2 receptor (AT2R), as well as histopathological features, were assessed in the brainstem and sciatic nerve. CCI resulted in clear pain-related behavior along with increased levels of inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and STAT3 activity, as well as increased levels of phosphorylated P38-MAPK, ACE, AT1R, and AT2R, along with worsened histopathological findings in both the brainstem and sciatic nerve. ARBs improved both animal behavior and all measured parameters in CCI rats and were more effective than ACE-Is. At the tested doses, centrally acting ARBs or ACE-Is were not superior to the peripherally acting drugs of the same category. These findings suggest that ARBs (centrally or peripherally acting) are an effective treatment modality for NP.

Telmisartan attenuates obesity-induced insulin resistance via suppression of AMPK mediated ER stress

Telmisartan is a known angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1 receptor blocker (ARB). While the beneficial effect of Telmisartan on glucose and lipid metabolism has been reported, the underlying molecular mechanism remained unclear. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is considered as one of important factors contributing to insulin resistance. In this study, we found that Telmisartan alleviated diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance, suppressed inflammation in adipose tissue, and alleviated hepatic steatosis. Furthermore, we showed that Telmisartan suppressed ER stress by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway in vivo. In differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes, Telmisartan also improved palmitate acid (PA) induced ER stress. Compound C, an AMPK inhibitor, could abolish beneficial effect of Telmisartan on ER stress. Our data indicated Telmisartan improved obesity-induced insulin resistance through suppression of ER stress by activation of AMPK. These results provided the evidence that Telmisartan may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of obesity and type II diabetes.

Telmisartan Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Tumor Growth of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inducing S-Phase Arrest In Vitro and In Vivo

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common primary esophageal malignancy. Telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker (ARB) and a widely used antihypertensive, has been shown to inhibit proliferation of various cancer types. This study evaluated the effects of telmisartan on human ESCC cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and sought to identify the microRNAs (miRNAs) involved in these antitumor effects. We examined the effects of telmisartan on three human ESCC cell lines (KYSE150, KYSE180, and KYSE850). Telmisartan inhibited proliferation of these three cell lines by inducing S-phase arrest, which was accompanied by decreased expression of cyclin A2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2, and other cell cycle-related proteins. Additionally, telmisartan reduced levels of phosphorylated ErbB3 and thrombospondin-1 in KYSE180 cells. Furthermore, expression of miRNAs was remarkably altered by telmisartan in vitro. Telmisartan also inhibited tumor growth in vivo in a xenograft mouse model. In conclusion, telmisartan inhibited cell proliferation and tumor growth in ESCC cells by inducing cell-cycle arrest.

The Possible Role of the Angiotensin System in the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia: Implications for Pharmacotherapy

A growing body of literature has elucidated the involvement of the central renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in various neuropsychiatric diseases. While consensus on the exact mechanism of the central RAS in schizophrenia pathophysiology does not currently exist, increasing evidence reveals promise in harnessing the therapeutic potential of RAS modulation in the treatment of schizophrenia. In this review, we examine how the central RAS affects inflammation, glutamate, dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ, all of which are associated with schizophrenia etiology. In addition, a recent study has demonstrated the therapeutic potential of RAS modulators, especially angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs), as adjunctive therapy to the currently available antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia treatment. With a greater understanding of how RAS inhibition directly modulates neurotransmitter balance in the brain, it is possible that compounds with RAS-inhibiting properties could be used to optimize physiological levels of glutamate, dopamine, and GABA, and the balance among the three neurotransmitters, analogously to how antipsychotic medications mediate the dopaminergic pathways. It can be hoped that a novel approach based on this concept, such as adjunctive telmisartan therapy, may offer practical interventional strategies to address currently unmet therapeutic needs in patients with schizophrenia, especially those with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Effects of azilsartan compared with telmisartan on insulin resistance in patients with essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: An open-label, randomized clinical trial

Background

Based on non-clinical data, it is expected that azilsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, will help improve insulin resistance in addition to its hypotensive action. The present study is aimed to explore the effect of azilsartan compared to telmisartan on insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients in the clinical setting.

Methods

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group exploratory study was conducted in Japan. We randomized adult patients (≥20 years old) with grade I or II essential hypertension and coexisting type 2 diabetes (1:1) to receive either oral azilsartan (20 mg/day;17 patients) or telmisartan (40 mg/day;16 patients) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the homeostasis model assessment ratio of insulin resistance (HOMA-R) from the baseline at the end of the treatment period. We also evaluated its safety and efficacy on other diabetes-related variables and blood pressure.

Findings

The mean changes in HOMA-R at the end of treatment were 0.22 (95% CI, −1.09–1.52) in the azilsartan group and −0.23 (95% CI, −0.72–0.27) in the telmisartan group. We found no clinically remarkable changes between the groups in diabetes-related variables such as fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c (NGSP), HOMA-β, or 1,5-anhydroglucitol. Reductions in clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed at week 4 and the reduced levels were maintained throughout the treatment period in both groups. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed. Only one drug-related TEAE (mild decrease in blood pressure) was reported in one patient in the azilsartan group.

Conclusion

Neither azilsartan nor telmisartan had any clinically remarkable effects on insulin resistance parameters when administered for 12 weeks to patients with grade I or II essential hypertension and coexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus. Azilsartan (20 mg/day) and telmisartan (40 mg/day) exerted comparable antihypertensive effects.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02079805

Association of polymorphisms of CYP11B2 gene -344C/T and ACE gene I/D with antihypertensive response to angiotensin receptor blockers in Chinese with hypertension

The aim of this study was to determine whether the polymorphism of aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) -344C/T and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) were associated with the response of blood pressure (BP) to telmisartan treatment. After a two-week single-blind placebo run-in period, 148 patients with mild-to-moderate primary hypertension received monotherapy of telmisartan with 80 mg/day and then were followed up for eight weeks. Polymorphisms of CYP11B2 -344C/T and ACE I/D gene were determined through polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment polymorphism analysis. The relationship between these polymorphisms and changes in BP was monitored and evaluated after eight weeks of treatment. With respect tothe polymorphism of CYP11B2 -344C/T, the reduction in diastolic BP was significantly greater in patients carrying the C allele (CC+CT) compared with those carrying the TT genotype. There was no significant differences between ACE I/D polymorphism and BP reduction after treatment. We concluded that the aldosterone synthase -344C/T polymorphism was related to the antihypertensive treatment with telmisartan in hypertensive patients.

Safety and efficacy of orally administered telmisartan for the treatment of systemic hypertension in cats: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the efficacy of telmisartan for feline systemic arterial hypertension is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PO administered telmisartan solution in hypertensive cats.

ANIMALS

Client-owned cats with indirect systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP) of 160-200 mm Hg, based on multiple measurements.

METHODS

This multicenter trial consisted a 28-day, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, efficacy phase and a 154-day extended-use telmisartan phase. Hypertensive cats were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg telmisartan/kg PO q12h for 14 days, followed by 2 mg telmisartan/kg PO q24h, or equivalent volume of placebo. Systolic blood pressure was measured on days 0, 14, and 28. Change in SBP compared to baseline was calculated for days 14 and 28. Telmisartan efficacy was defined as significant decrease in SBP at day 14 compared to placebo and a clinically relevant (>20 mm Hg) decrease in SBP at day 28.

RESULTS

Two-hundred twenty-one cats were included. On day 14, least squares mean (95% confidence interval) SBP decrease was significantly larger in telmisartan-treated (-23.3 mm Hg [-28.2 to -18.3]) versus placebo-treated (-7.5 mm Hg [-13.6 to -1.5]) cats (P = .0005). On day 28, telmisartan treatment resulted in a clinically relevant SBP decrease (-23.9 mm Hg [-27.8 to -20.0]), whereas placebo did not (-11.6 mm Hg [-17.4 to -5.9 mm Hg]). The decrease in SBP persisted over the 6-month trial in telmisartan-treated cats.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Telmisartan significantly decreased SBP to a clinically relevant extent and was well tolerated in hypertensive cats.

A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled, Multicentre Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan /Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide Compared to Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Essential Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Triple drug combination has shown to be effective in controlling blood pressure (BP) with low rates of drug-related side effects. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of a triple pill of telmisartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with a dual combination of telmisartan/HCTZ in treating hypertensive patients who did not respond to monotherapies.

METHODS

A total of 512 patients were randomized to receive either low-dose triple pill or the dual combination therapy. The primary endpoint was BP normalization after 8 weeks. The secondary endpoints were BP normalization at 4 weeks, changes in BP from baseline to Week 8, comparison of BP normalization between treatment groups, and difference in BP responder rates. The analysis was conducted on the intent-to-treat (ITT), modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol (PP) population.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference was noted between triple pill and telmi+HCTZ in the normalization of BP at Week 8 in the mITT (p=0.041) and PP (p=0. 038) populations. Also, a statistically significant improvement was observed in BP normalization in triple pill group compared with telmi+HCTZ group in ITT (p=0.022) and mITT (p=0.015) populations after 4 weeks. At Week 8, a significant reduction in BP was seen compared to the baseline in both the treatment groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups in BP normalization. Diastolic BP responder rates were significantly better for triple pill group in PP population (p=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The triple pill was found to be effective in achieving early normalization of BP in hypertensive patients who did not respond to monotherapies.

IMPROVEMENT OF TREATMENT IN PERSONS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION AND TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

The aim of study was the optimization of treatment in patients with arterial hypertension and coexistent type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study involved 96 persons with arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (2 of them were excluded). Patients with arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=94) were divided in two subgroups: persons from the first (n=54) were treated by telmisartan 40-80 mg/day; second (n=40) - by lisinopril 10-20 mg/day. People from the first subgroup (n=54) were divided in Іa (n=25) and Іb (n=29) according to the level of endothelin-1. Persons from the Іa subgroup with less than 10 pg/ml levels of endothelin were treated by telmisartan 40 mg/day. People from the Іb subgroup with more than 10 pg/ml levels of endothelin were treated by telmisartan 80 mg/day. Patients were observed by echocardiography, albumin excretion rate in six months and by glycated hemoglobin in 3 months. Telmisartan is not worse than lisinopril according to protection of heart and kidney. Under the influence of treatment with telmisartan at a dose of 40 mg/day in subjects with arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus and less than 10 pg/ml level of endothelin-1, the values of albumin excretion rate decreased by 9,7% (p=0,0328), and left ventricular mass index - by 6,7% (p=0,0007). In coexistent patients with greater than 10 pg/ml level of endothelin-1 and 80 mg/day dose of telmisartan, the level of albumin excretion rate was reduced by 4,9% (p=0,0435), and left ventricular mass index - by 3,1% (p<0,0001). If the level of this indicator is less than 10 pg/ml, the dose of telmisartan is 40 mg/day, if the level of endothelin-1 is more than 10 pg/ml, the dose of telmisartan is 80 mg/day.

Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Antagonists Protect Against Alpha-Synuclein-Induced Neuroinflammation and Dopaminergic Neuron Death

The loss of dopaminergic neurons and α-synuclein accumulation are major hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD), and it has been suggested that a major mechanism of α-synuclein toxicity is microglial activation. The lack of animal models that properly reproduce PD, and particularly the underlying synucleinopathy, has hampered the clarification of PD mechanisms and the development of effective therapies. Here, we used neurospecific adeno-associated viral vectors serotype 9 coding for either the wild-type or mutated forms of human alpha-synuclein (WT and SynA53T, respectively) under the control of a synapsin promoter to further induce a marked dopaminergic neuron loss together with an important microglial neuroinflammatory response. Overexpression of neuronal alpha-synuclein led to increased expression of angiotensin type 1 receptors and NADPH oxidase activity, together with a marked increase in the number of OX-6-positive microglial cells and expression of markers of phagocytic activity (CD68) and classical pro-inflammatory/M1 microglial phenotype markers such as inducible nitric oxide synthase, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1β, and IL-6. Moreover, a significant decrease in the expression of markers of immunoregulatory/M2 microglial phenotype such as the enzyme arginase-1 was constantly observed. Interestingly, alpha-synuclein-induced changes in microglial phenotype markers and dopaminergic neuron death were inhibited by simultaneous treatment with the angiotensin type 1 blockers candesartan or telmisartan. Our results suggest the repurposing of candesartan and telmisartan as a neuroprotective strategy for PD.

Successful management of proteinuria and systemic hypertension in a dog with renal cell carcinoma with surgery, telmisartan, and amlodipine

An 11-year-old neutered male Yorkshire terrier dog was presented with a 3-week history of hematuria and anorexia. A unilateral renal mass was detected and surgically removed. The renal mass was diagnosed on histopathologic examination as a renal carcinoma. Supportive medical therapy was carried out and persistent systemic hypertension was managed using telmisartan.

Modulation of brain ACE and ACE2 may be a promising protective strategy against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury: an experimental trial in rats

The brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is considered a crucial regulator for physiological homeostasis and disease progression. We evaluated the protective effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activator xanthenone on experimental cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Rats were divided into a sham control, a cerebral I/R control, a standard treatment (nimodipine, 10 mg/kg/day, 15 days, p.o.), three telmisartan treatments (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg/day, 15 days, p.o.), and three xanthenone treatments (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg/day, 15 days, s.c.) groups. One hour after the last dose, all rats except the sham control group were exposed to 30-min cerebral ischemia followed by 24-h reperfusion. Brain ACE and ACE2 activities and the apoptotic marker caspase-3 levels were assessed. Glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide end products (NOx) as oxidative markers and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-10 as immunological markers were assessed. Histopathological examination and immunohistochemical evaluation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were performed in cerebral cortex and hippocampus sections. Telmisartan and xanthenone in the higher doses restored MDA, NOx, TNF-α, IL-6, caspase-3, ACE, and GFAP back to normal levels and significantly increased GSH, IL-10, and ACE2 compared to I/R control values. Histopathologically, both agents showed mild degenerative changes and necrosis of neurons in cerebral cortex and hippocampus compared with I/R control group. Modulation of brain RAS, either through suppression of the classic ACE pathway or stimulation of its antagonist pathway ACE2, may be a promising strategy against cerebral I/R damage.

Effects of telmisartan on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients

This study examined the effects and mechanisms of telmisartan in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Hypertensive patients with PAF (n=120) were randomized into test (telmisartan) and control (amlodipine besilate) groups. The pretreatment and post treatment left atrial dimension (LAD), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, heart rate, blood pressure (BP), and recurrence times of atrial fibrillation (AF) were recorded. The pretreatment and post treatment heart rates and BPs did not differ in either group (P>0.05). The post treatment systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) did not differ between the groups (SBP: test, 132±5mmHg; control, 133±6 mmHg; DBP: test, 82±4 mmHg; control, 83±4mmHg). The LAD (test, 36.7±5.1 mm; control, 31.3±4.1mm) and hs-CRP (test, 5.6±2.6mg/L; control, 3.1±1.9mg/L) levels declined significantly (P>0.05) after treatment in the telmisartan group but not in the control group. After treatment, the LAD (test, 31.3±4.1mm; control, 36.2±4.6mm), hs-CRP (test, 3.1±1.9 mg/L; control, 5.2±2.3mg/L) levels, and AF recurrence times were markedly lower in the test group (22) compared with the control group (44). Thus, telmisartan reduced the AF recurrence rates, LAD, and hs-CRP levels.